Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(My Fox DC)   Step 1) Steal 94 pairs of underpants Step 2) ?????? Step 3) Profit?   (myfoxdc.com ) divider line
    More: Weird, mall security  
•       •       •

3134 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Sep 2012 at 10:33 PM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



37 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-09-25 07:09:52 PM  
Textbook use of the "Step 3) Profit?" meme.
 
2012-09-25 09:44:35 PM  
Step 2) Sniff
 
2012-09-25 09:57:12 PM  
Done in one.
 
2012-09-25 10:30:20 PM  

RedPhoenix122: Done in one.


Donner in two.
 
2012-09-25 10:37:41 PM  
Allow me.
i229.photobucket.com
 
2012-09-25 10:39:21 PM  
Uh-huh...any excuse to review the "security tapes" from Victoria's Secret. I see what you are doing there, Lou.
 
2012-09-25 10:41:09 PM  
For the love of God...What size were they?!
 
2012-09-25 10:41:54 PM  
Hey guys? What's step 2?
 
2012-09-25 10:46:21 PM  
Tom Servo wanted for questioning.
 
2012-09-25 10:46:29 PM  
What sizes are missing? If it's anything bigger than S, just cut your losses and move on.

tit-rating.com
 
2012-09-25 10:46:42 PM  
Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?
 
2012-09-25 10:47:02 PM  

MikeSass: Uh-huh...any excuse to review the "security tapes" from Victoria's Secret. I see what you are doing there, Lou.


It's gonna take forever doing it one handed, I'm sure....
 
2012-09-25 10:48:36 PM  
The center is Northpark. Coincidence? I think not.
 
2012-09-25 10:51:48 PM  

Satanic_Hamster: Hey guys? What's step 2?


Step 1 is collect underpants.
 
2012-09-25 10:52:57 PM  
Talk about getting your panties in a bunch.
 
2012-09-25 10:54:58 PM  
Do they have to review the change-room CCTV footage too?
 
2012-09-25 10:56:39 PM  
some 20 years ago i was in a shoe store in a mall. noticed a Victoria's Secret was directly opposite the shoe store. i asked the old shoe salesmen if they had to pay to work in the shoe store but none of them heard me.
 
2012-09-25 10:58:20 PM  
94 pairs of panties on the doll
94 pairs of panties
Take one off, sniff it and cough
93 pairs of panties on the doll
 
2012-09-25 11:03:25 PM  

HotWingAgenda: Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?


That's an interesting point. It does have a singular form, "Panty Raid" or "panty liner". But panties themselves aren't singular.
 
2012-09-25 11:11:02 PM  

Oznog: HotWingAgenda: Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?

That's an interesting point. It does have a singular form, "Panty Raid" or "panty liner". But panties themselves aren't singular.


I believe some Voltron-like assembly is involved.
 
2012-09-25 11:25:11 PM  
He was just tryin' to save them britches from Steamy Ray Vaughn.
 
2012-09-25 11:25:53 PM  
Came for the Doofus and Henry Hodgekiss, left satisfied enough with the sniff comment.
 
2012-09-25 11:28:09 PM  

Nuclear Monk: Oznog: HotWingAgenda: Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?

That's an interesting point. It does have a singular form, "Panty Raid" or "panty liner". But panties themselves aren't singular.

I believe some Voltron-like assembly is involved.



Because 'Pants' is plural because 'Pantaloons" is plural because a thousand years ago you used to put on two stocking leggings separately, connected each legging with a strap to your underwear, and then you wore a tunic on top of that. And that's how everyone walked around.
 
2012-09-25 11:28:16 PM  
They didn't uses steps, they used phases.

25.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-09-25 11:29:27 PM  
Are they making a quilt?
 
2012-09-25 11:30:51 PM  

Oznog: HotWingAgenda: Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?

That's an interesting point. It does have a singular form, "Panty Raid" or "panty liner". But panties themselves aren't singular.


Might get the form from pants... pants only just a little less oddly plural, with that whole number of legs thing...
 
2012-09-25 11:50:18 PM  

sno man: Oznog: HotWingAgenda: Why do panties come in "pairs" anyways? Has anyone ever seen just one panty, without the other half of the pair? Were they original sold individually, and you had to buy the second one and assemble the pair at home?

That's an interesting point. It does have a singular form, "Panty Raid" or "panty liner". But panties themselves aren't singular.

Might get the form from pants... pants only just a little less oddly plural, with that whole number of legs thing...


Well, to drop the last syllable(s) and replace it with "-ie" or "-y" is a hypocorism, a diminutive/endearing shortened form of a word. But a hypocorism does not involve pluralizing it.
 
2012-09-26 12:11:26 AM  
I think for the people who are into collecting used underpants, the underpants themselves are the profit.
 
2012-09-26 12:11:28 AM  
img833.imageshack.us
 
2012-09-26 01:01:53 AM  

sno man: RedPhoenix122: Done in one.

Donner in two.


Blitzen in three.
 
2012-09-26 02:38:28 AM  
What a haul, what a haul!

t2.gstatic.com
 
2012-09-26 05:12:17 AM  
I never realized that there was a market for black-market underwear. Or is that racist? I can't tell anymore.

/Tasteless joke about identifying the getaway vehicle from the skidmarks left behind.
 
2012-09-26 06:13:03 AM  
It is I, LeClerc!

2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-09-26 07:50:44 AM  
Arnold Layne
Had a strange hobby
Collecting clothes
Moonshine washing line
They suit him fine
On the wall
Hung a tall mirror
Distorted view
See-through baby blue
He dug it
Oh, Arnold Layne
It's not the same
Takes two to know
 
2012-09-26 01:48:14 PM  
step 2: take them to japan.
 
2012-09-26 07:29:27 PM  

roughridersfan: They didn't uses steps, they used phases.

 
2012-09-27 08:32:02 AM  
This journalist enjoyed writing this piece a little too much, methinks.
 
Displayed 37 of 37 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report