If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Dolt)   Mitt Romney has the lowest favorability rating of any presidential nominee in history, including all of the eventual losers. Fark: And that's before he insulted 47% of the American population   (thedailydolt.com) divider line 207
    More: Interesting, Mitt Romney, presidents  
•       •       •

2618 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Sep 2012 at 11:37 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



207 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-21 12:43:01 PM

Citrate1007: Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?

Thank you Fox News for Keeping Us Infromed

/would expect no less from you Cletus
//tell me again about the silent majority


I will. The new silent majority in this country are not Tea Tards or Cletuc C's. They are sane people who don't carry misspelled signs and don't flock to a farking garbage food chicken joint to hate on gays. They hear all this stuff and get turned off by it. They notice things streaming from the right and realize that the loudest idiots in the party are spouting things they do not agree with. They're the ones who will decide the vote, not the screaming idiots who have done so much damage to the political culture of this country since 2010.
 
2012-09-21 12:43:01 PM

whosits_112: If you think the 47% are all just Joe Bubba and Laquisha, sitting around on their asses all day and collect government checks, then you are just an asshole.


No. Some of the time they are out commiting crimes.
 
2012-09-21 12:43:39 PM

Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?


I have a poll for you. Take a seat.
 
2012-09-21 12:43:52 PM

SevenizGud: It's true. About 47% of Americans are parasites. There is no elegant way to say that. It's still true, though.


This may be true, but 95% of that 47% are from Red states sucking up government resources and holding up misspelled "Vote Rmoney" signs.
 
2012-09-21 12:44:26 PM

Lando Lincoln: They want to have Generic Republican on the ticket, since Generic Republican handily beats Obama in polls, so they tried to get the most generic Republican that they could find. Unfortunately, Mitt isn't generic enough. Not only is he not generic enough, he's an elitist asshole, and people are starting to understand that.




Maybe the GOP leadership wanted Romney because the taller candidate usually wins.

(can't think of any other reason)
 
2012-09-21 12:44:53 PM

rtaylor92: The RNC is really are a bunch of dimwits. Imagine if they had really put their muscle behind Huntsman and used Fox News and the narrative in general to set him up as the presumptive nominee. Imagine where we'd be right now. Republicans are always going to vote for the guy with the "R" after his name so that would still be locked up but you'd legitimately have a horse race with the undecideds and independents.

I'm always teetering back and forth, wondering if republicans are really this stupid or if they're actually just evil and faking the stupidity but on this one, since it will cost them the election I'm going to have to go with irredeemably stupid.


I think it is totally irrelevant who won the primary. The pattern is pretty clear that the Presidential candidates in the GOP have no power and no "free will" - McCain and Romney both immediately turned into Bush clones (or the imaginary version of Reagan) as soon as it was clear they had won the Primary and the GOP backroom elites took over and started telling them what to do and say if they wanted the money and machinery of the RNC and the rest of the GOP party to stand behind them.
 
2012-09-21 12:44:55 PM

hillbillypharmacist: Politicandy: I used to think he was the Republican John Kerry, but apparently his situation is even worse.

John Kerry was a boring nice guy.

Romney is an boring asshole.


I dunno.. I think he's farking hilarious...he's living proof that money can't buy class, smarts, or dignity, or respectibilty.

/gotta earn those
//bootstrappy
///but something cute, with a low heel and in a soft leather that you can fold down and wear with leggings or jeans
 
2012-09-21 12:44:58 PM

JerkStore: This survey overlooks his most critical feature: he's not black.



Yet. He has already gone for Latino. Given how frequently he changes positions, can you be sure he won't try being black?
 
2012-09-21 12:45:12 PM
Face it Mitt, no one is voting for you. They're either voting for the Republican nominee no matter what or they're voting against Obama.
 
2012-09-21 12:45:15 PM

Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?


It says that much of the country buys into the bullshiat that the GOP has been spewing for the past three years.

You seem to be a smart guy. You've seen the job loss charts. You've seen how many jobs we we losing on the day Obama walked into office. You've seen how those job losses tailed off the longer Obama was in office. You see how many consecutive job gain months we've had since. So you know that that "millions of jobs lost under Obama's tenure" factoid is 95% due to the shiat that happened before Obama walked into office. But it's a hard number, and the GOP can technically stick it to Obama, so they do, and much of America believes that number, even if that number doesn't paint an accurate picture of the jobs story at all.

And the GOP has other bullshiat numbers that they can stick to Obama, and they do, and much of America believes the story that those numbers falsely tell as well. I can't really blame them. They're the opposition party, and they want to be in power again, and they'll do whatever they can to achieve that goal. Even if what they do is indirectly stalling the economy.

So what does it say about the incumbent? It says that he's gaining ground against a bad economy, but he's losing much of the message war.
 
2012-09-21 12:45:31 PM

God Is My Co-Pirate: coeyagi: God Is My Co-Pirate: what_now: God Is My Co-Pirate: It struck me earlier this morning that Romney has probably never had a real job interview in his life.

I think at that level, when your father is governor and your family friends are all on the Board of Directors, when you're first out of school, a friendly VP quietly takes you out to lunch and gently asks you some questions about where you want your career to go. You don't have to sweat in front of a panel of total strangers and sell yourself with everything you've got. Of course he doesn't know how to convince voters that he's the man for the job - he has literally less experience doing that than your average student.

Wow. That is a very very interesting point. I never really thought about that.

Thanks, I'm busy right now prepping for an interview on Tuesday, and it occurs to me that I probably shouldn't stride in and say to the panel, "Boy, that last guy you interviewed was terrible, huh? I mean, he'll ruin your company if you hire him, haha. So, when do I start?"

No, go balls deep. Do just that. Maybe even whip your dick out on the table and say "I will personally thrust your company to the next level". It can't hurt / help.

Ha! I don't actually have a dick, but that's never stopped me before.


That's even better. They would be expecting a guy to whip out his dick, but a strapon might catch them off guard. If you get the chance, slap somebody in the forehead with it to show that you're an aggressive go-getter.
 
2012-09-21 12:46:36 PM

Cubicle Jockey: Gah.. html fail.

Don't click the link above, it's just a messed up tag which links back to "Mitt Romneys Tax Return"'s post from 11:48:47.


DAMN YOU, FARTBONGO!!!!
 
2012-09-21 12:48:18 PM

Cletus C.: The question I raised was that about how half the country plans to vote for the guy with the least-favorable rating ever for a presidential candidate and what that says about Obama.


It means that the fact that Mittens can't seal the deal against THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! shows that narrative was complete and utter bullshiat to begin with.
 
2012-09-21 12:49:58 PM
Anybody else a little depressed that they were voting prior to "modern history"?
 
2012-09-21 12:50:17 PM

KJUW89: This may be true, but 95% of that 47% are from Red states sucking up government resources and holding up misspelled "Vote Rmoney" signs.


I'm for stopping the rewarding of people for being parasitic bums. If that means red states get disproportionately larger relative cuts in "reward the parasite" payments, then so be it.
 
2012-09-21 12:50:21 PM

Opiate of the Lasses: Hobodeluxe: [s3.amazonaws.com image 550x385]

WTF is wrong with you people? Don't you realize what a privilege it is to be able to vote for my husband?

I dislike this biatch far more than I do Mitt

/and I wouldn't piss on Mitt if he were on fire


I'm with you on that one. Ann Romney looks, acts, and preaches like a rich, annoying biatch who wouldn't give 99% of the country the tije of day if their lives depended on it.

I hate to judge a person on ooks, but with Ann Romney it is impossible not to do that. Even her smile is forced and fake for the cameras, as if WE are honored to even look at her. And that little rant she gave saying we should be privileged to have her husband as President seals the deal.

And Mitt is just a jerk weed, through and through. If he needs his wife to come out and defend him, ain't no we he should get anywhere near the launch codes and be my CinC. I couldn't even imagine my CO's wife coming out to speak at formation defending her battalion commander husband because she heard we hated him and him command. That clown would be relieved of command the next day.

/unfortunately, I know way too many Marines and service members who will vote for that guy simply because...you take a wild guess?
//yeah, he's nit the black guy occupying "their" WHITE House
 
2012-09-21 12:55:18 PM

SevenizGud: KJUW89: This may be true, but 95% of that 47% are from Red states sucking up government resources and holding up misspelled "Vote Rmoney" signs.

I'm for stopping the rewarding of people for being parasitic bums. If that means red states get disproportionately larger relative cuts in "reward the parasite" payments, then so be it.


Maybe if you could stop talking in inflammatory rhetoric, people might not think you are a dimwitted jaggoff.
 
2012-09-21 12:57:53 PM
Romney reminds me of the CEO of the company I worked at for 10 years.

At one point, we all had to go under mandatory "gender sensitivity training". Of course, the irony of it was that the CEO was probably the one who most was likely to spew off the insensitive joke about "dames" or whatever. And when leaving one of the seminars, the CEO wanders by, and someone jokingly asked him why he wasn't at the meeting.

His response was basically that by going to the meetings, that opens up a liability of him getting sued, since he would then have knowledge that talking about women on the clock the way he did is wrong. This way he could legally feign ignorance.

Anyway, I see Romney in the exact same light; as a guy who can easily just skip pass these mandatory things in life because they inconvenience him, without worry from any ramifications.
 
2012-09-21 12:58:15 PM

Cubicle Jockey: I'm hoping Obama's good polling numbers and proected EV lead will prevent Ohio and Florida shenanigans from happening this year. In 2000 and 2004, the R's only had to swing one state to win. This year, they'll have to stage "upsets" in several swing states for Romney to win.

2004 wasn't just about Ohio. Remember twenty-six states had exit polls which showed statistically significant levels of higher support for Kerry than he ended up with. The National Election Data Archive Project listed this as a 1 in 16.5 million chance of occuring naturally.

Furthermore, that election had the highest turn out percentage since 1968. High turnouts have always been beneficial to Democratic candidates, yet they lost ground? 12 million people who didn't vote for Bush in 2000 voted for him in 2004, while Kerry only gained 9 million .

Ohio is famous because it was the most blatant. But don't think for a second shenanigans weren't going on elsewhere.


I think it's wise to be skeptical when people start shouting that "It's a conspiracy," otherwise we sound as unhinged as the truthers. I'm trying to hold out some hope that Republicans can't just steal elections at will. They did lose pretty badly in '08.
 
2012-09-21 12:59:39 PM
Good thing American Thinker has already determined he is the winner.

//Kind of like Charlie Sheen #winning
 
2012-09-21 01:04:47 PM
This is riduculous. Who do you trust more, the lying liberal media or my facebook posts and email forwards?
 
2012-09-21 01:05:24 PM

sammyk: DirkValentine: sammyk: Aarontology: Politicandy: I used to think he was the Republican John Kerry, but apparently his situation is even worse.

Yeah. People didn't take Kerry seriously, but he wasn't actively disliked.

He was disliked as much as any out of touch rich arsehole. If you have never worried about how you are going to pay the rent or never had to consider what you could actually afford when buying a car you are out of touch with the average Joe. Period. You did not get that rich by just working hard and playing buy the rules. A lot of people resent that and dislike them for it. Granted Kerry married most of his money but he is a senator and they all game the system in ways that would most likely have you or I put in prison.

The difference is Rmoney is pure evil and has willfully destroyed functioning businesses and harmed the communities that depend on them in the name of profit. Kerry hasn't reached that level of evil but I still dislike him.

What? Are you saying that Kerry never worked for anything? Oh, yeah, I guess he didn't actually risk his life for his country VOLUNTARILY.

You, sir, are a buffoon.

I never said I had no respect for his military service. But the guy was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Just like dear old dad he married money.

From wikipedia:"Kerry is the child of Richard Kerry (1915-2000), a Foreign Service Officer and an attorney for the Bureau of United Nations Affairs, and Rosemary Forbes Kerry (1913-2002), a World War II nurse and member of the wealthy Forbes family. Rosemary was born in Paris, France, to American parents. Kerry has three siblings: two sisters, Diana (born in 1947) and Margerie (aka Peggy; born in 1941), and a brother, Cameron (born in 1950), Cameron Kerry was picked to be President Barack Obama's general counsel of the Commerce Department.[1] One of Kerry's maternal great-great-grandfathers was Robert Charles Winthrop, the 22nd Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.[2]"


Silver spoon or not, he's earned mountains of respect more than Romney. Period.
 
2012-09-21 01:08:18 PM

Tyrano Soros: This is riduculous. Who do you trust more, the lying liberal media or my facebook posts and email forwards?


Thread over. Winnar is you. Newsletter, etc.
 
2012-09-21 01:14:02 PM

TimonC346: Is there a real reason the GOP hates Obama so much? With the exception of healthcare reform (passed by almost all of the past 4 presidents), what is their beef? His economic strategy is fairly similar to W's, his foreign policy is only viewed as different because he doesn't appear as reckless or as inarticulate as W, and he has barely done anything the GOP hasn't been completely behind in the past.

So what the shiat really gives here?



www.yogalifestyle.com
 
MFL
2012-09-21 01:16:41 PM
Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.
 
2012-09-21 01:18:20 PM
Here is a partial list of things that have higher favorability ratings than Mitt Romney:

Haggis
Painful rectal itch
Dry rot
Guinea worms
"Lite" beer
Milli Vanilli
AOL
Ishtar
The 1919 Chicago White Sox
Smog
Finding your wife in bed with the mailman
Vogon poetry
Shingles
"Achy Breaky Heart"
Morris dancing
Tsunamis
Sobriety checkpoints
Guys who smell their fingers
Projectile vomiting
Lutefisk
Rabid weasels
Rush hour traffic
Spiders
Snakes
Taxes
Death
 
2012-09-21 01:20:13 PM

MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.


hey, while you're out grabbing polls would you check Nate Silver's EV predictions?
I just want to make sure I know stuff that IS, ya know?
 
2012-09-21 01:21:09 PM

BMulligan: Here is a partial list of things that have higher favorability ratings than Mitt Romney:

Haggis
Painful rectal itch
Dry rot
Guinea worms
"Lite" beer
Milli Vanilli
AOL
Ishtar
The 1919 Chicago White Sox
Smog
Finding your wife in bed with the mailman
Vogon poetry
Shingles
"Achy Breaky Heart"
Morris dancing
Tsunamis
Sobriety checkpoints
Guys who smell their fingers
Projectile vomiting
Lutefisk
Rabid weasels
Rush hour traffic
Spiders
Snakes
Taxes
Death


He is still polling higher than rape
 
2012-09-21 01:22:11 PM

MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.


Well, handpicking a couple of polls and ignoring the rest so that you can support a conclusion makes you ignorant. It also makes you intellectually dishonest, or probably safe to say, a liar. Being derogatory toward others for supposedly exhibiting the same traits that you are exhibiting makes you a hypocrite. So, Mr. lying, ignorant, hypocrite, a couple of links:

538 - Sept. 20: Obama's Convention Bounce May Not Be Receding
 
2012-09-21 01:22:20 PM
If you make more than $300,000 per year, there is a logical reason to vote for Romney...your taxes will go down.

If you don't make more than $300,000 per year, the only reason to vote for Romney is because you hate Obama so much that you don't care who is in office, as long as it isn't Obama. (Or maybe you are a Mormon and really want a Mormon to be President.)

All other reasons that usually apply to voting Republican go out the window. Health care? Gun control? Abortion? International policies? The budget? No one, possibly including Romney himself, knows how he will deal with these things once he is in office. He is a total unknown on all issues aside from "give rich people/corporations tax breaks."
 
2012-09-21 01:23:28 PM
 
2012-09-21 01:26:26 PM

sammyk: Aarontology: Politicandy: I used to think he was the Republican John Kerry, but apparently his situation is even worse.

Yeah. People didn't take Kerry seriously, but he wasn't actively disliked.

He was disliked as much as any out of touch rich arsehole. If you have never worried about how you are going to pay the rent or never had to consider what you could actually afford when buying a car you are out of touch with the average Joe. Period.
You did not get that rich by just working hard and playing buy the rules. A lot of people resent that and dislike them for it. Granted Kerry married most of his money but he is a senator and they all game the system in ways that would most likely have you or I put in prison.

The difference is Rmoney is pure evil and has willfully destroyed functioning businesses and harmed the communities that depend on them in the name of profit. Kerry hasn't reached that level of evil but I still dislike him.


All of that applied to Bush as well.
 
2012-09-21 01:28:18 PM

Citrate1007: He is still polling higher than rape


Only if you conflate both the legitimate and illegitimate kinds of rape.
 
2012-09-21 01:29:45 PM

MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.


Pretty bad that you have to pick two outlyers just to show that Romney is tied. Even if Romeny was up two points on the popularity polling he would likely lose the electoral college. As it is, he's behind nearly 4 points.
 
2012-09-21 01:30:07 PM

MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.


*cough**cough* 
 
2012-09-21 01:31:01 PM

Lando Lincoln: TimonC346: Is there a real reason the GOP hates Obama so much? With the exception of healthcare reform (passed by almost all of the past 4 presidents), what is their beef? His economic strategy is fairly similar to W's, his foreign policy is only viewed as different because he doesn't appear as reckless or as inarticulate as W, and he has barely done anything the GOP hasn't been completely behind in the past.

So what the shiat really gives here?

Black + Democrat.

If he was a black Republican, they'd love the guy.

If he was a white Democrat, they wouldn't mind him nearly as much.


latimesblogs.latimes.com

Anyone who remembers when this guy was POTUS would disagree with you.
 
2012-09-21 01:32:40 PM

Carn: MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.

Well, handpicking a couple of polls and ignoring the rest so that you can support a conclusion makes you ignorant. It also makes you intellectually dishonest, or probably safe to say, a liar. Being derogatory toward others for supposedly exhibiting the same traits that you are exhibiting makes you a hypocrite. So, Mr. lying, ignorant, hypocrite, a couple of links:

538 - Sept. 20: Obama's Convention Bounce May Not Be Receding


Why is it that MFL keeps posting links that can be easily refuted? Is he running with an earlier version of the Romneybot software that was full of bugs?
 
2012-09-21 01:35:42 PM

Rwa2play: Carn: MFL: Gallup
Rassmussen

Yet after it was declared the "worst week of any presidential candidate in history", Mitt Romney just erased Obama's (fake) post convention "bounce".

The problem with liberals isn't that they are ignorant, they just know so much that isn't so.

Well, handpicking a couple of polls and ignoring the rest so that you can support a conclusion makes you ignorant. It also makes you intellectually dishonest, or probably safe to say, a liar. Being derogatory toward others for supposedly exhibiting the same traits that you are exhibiting makes you a hypocrite. So, Mr. lying, ignorant, hypocrite, a couple of links:

538 - Sept. 20: Obama's Convention Bounce May Not Be Receding

Why is it that MFL keeps posting links that can be easily refuted? Is he running with an earlier version of the Romneybot software that was full of bugs?


It's part of the rule in their club. No matter how often you are caught red-handed in the lie of your talking points, you must double down! Keep shouting louder because you are righteous and true!
 
2012-09-21 01:36:19 PM

Zerochance: Cletus C.: The question I raised was that about how half the country plans to vote for the guy with the least-favorable rating ever for a presidential candidate and what that says about Obama.

It means that the fact that Mittens can't seal the deal against THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!! shows that narrative was complete and utter bullshiat to begin with.


I hadn't heard he's the worst president ever. Not sure I believe that, either.
 
2012-09-21 01:36:27 PM

Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?


60 million people vote Republican based on party affiliation, even when the party's leaders consider them below contempt?
 
2012-09-21 01:37:45 PM
I vote for calling flip-flops 'Romneys" from now on on Fark. Seems appropriate.
 
2012-09-21 01:40:00 PM

Holfax: All other reasons that usually apply to voting Republican go out the window. Health care? Gun control? Abortion? International policies? The budget? No one, possibly including Romney himself, knows how he will deal with these things once he is in office. He is a total unknown on all issues aside from "give rich people/corporations tax breaks."


Is this still a thing that the GOP is pushing, that Democrats wanna take away yer guns? Didn't SCOTUS rule on this a few years ago, and now everyone has the right to a .50cal SAW in their living room, and if you cannot afford a firearm, one will be provided by the courts at no charge?

Things like hi-cap magazines and outlawing TYPES of guns, maybe, but I don't hear about that nearly as often as I did in HS (and I was paying less attention then). Maybe because that's when the Brady Bill was being discussed?
 
2012-09-21 01:40:56 PM

Hobodeluxe: [s3.amazonaws.com image 550x385]

WTF is wrong with you people? Don't you realize what a privilege it is to be able to vote for my husband?


Thanks for the source.

i215.photobucket.com
 
2012-09-21 01:49:06 PM

LibertyHiller: Lando Lincoln: TimonC346: Is there a real reason the GOP hates Obama so much? With the exception of healthcare reform (passed by almost all of the past 4 presidents), what is their beef? His economic strategy is fairly similar to W's, his foreign policy is only viewed as different because he doesn't appear as reckless or as inarticulate as W, and he has barely done anything the GOP hasn't been completely behind in the past.

So what the shiat really gives here?

Black + Democrat.

If he was a black Republican, they'd love the guy.

If he was a white Democrat, they wouldn't mind him nearly as much.

[latimesblogs.latimes.com image 193x238]

Anyone who remembers when this guy was POTUS would disagree with you.


Yeah--I was just going over the responses, and the same image popped into my head--they tried SO hard to torpedo Clinton, despite the fact the country wasn't as polarized about him as they are Obama.
 
2012-09-21 01:50:33 PM

LibertyHiller: Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?

60 million people vote Republican based on party affiliation, even when the party's leaders consider them below contempt?


Heh, That's the beauty of the plan!
 
2012-09-21 01:52:14 PM

BMulligan: Here is a partial list of things that have higher favorability ratings than Mitt Romney:

Haggis
Painful rectal itch
Dry rot
Guinea worms
"Lite" beer
Milli Vanilli
AOL
Ishtar
The 1919 Chicago White Sox
Smog
Finding your wife in bed with the mailman
Vogon poetry
Shingles
"Achy Breaky Heart"
Morris dancing
Tsunamis
Sobriety checkpoints
Guys who smell their fingers
Projectile vomiting
Lutefisk
Rabid weasels
Rush hour traffic
Spiders
Snakes
Taxes
Death


ok, so I had to google guinea worms.

I don't recommend doing that.
 
2012-09-21 01:55:31 PM

Cletus C.: And yet polling shows the popular vote is almost a dead heat.

What does that say about the incumbent?


That he's a ni*bong. Duh.
 
2012-09-21 01:56:23 PM

Cletus C.: I understand how that works. President Gore made that quite clear.

The question I raised was that about how half the country plans to vote for the guy with the least-favorable rating ever for a presidential candidate and what that says about Obama.


Actually it says a lot more about the GOP.

During a time of low economic growth and anti-incumbent sentiment, this is the best the GOP can do to foster that resentment into something beneficial for them?

The GOP should be dominating this election but since they swung hard to the right to lure in the Tea Party folks, the more moderate folks in the center are deciding that Obama is the lesser evil.

So let me ask you this Cletus. What does that say about the GOP and Romney?
 
2012-09-21 02:00:38 PM
"Number ONE, b*tches!"

images.politico.com
 
2012-09-21 02:03:46 PM

Mrtraveler01: Cletus C.: I understand how that works. President Gore made that quite clear.

The question I raised was that about how half the country plans to vote for the guy with the least-favorable rating ever for a presidential candidate and what that says about Obama.

Actually it says a lot more about the GOP.

During a time of low economic growth and anti-incumbent sentiment, this is the best the GOP can do to foster that resentment into something beneficial for them?

The GOP should be dominating this election but since they swung hard to the right to lure in the Tea Party folks, the more moderate folks in the center are deciding that Obama is the lesser evil.

So let me ask you this Cletus. What does that say about the GOP and Romney?


That Romney was not a hard swing to the right? Not at all, really.

There was a whole clown car load of those who wanted on the ballot. He wasn't one of them.
 
Displayed 50 of 207 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report