If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(PJ Media)   How DOJ goons threaten the right using illegal tactics. Hey why are you suprised   (pjmedia.com) divider line 64
    More: Obvious, DOJ, J. Christian Adams, Hermann Goering, Opa, flying monkeys, Reich, chess tactics, Media Matters  
•       •       •

1801 clicks; posted to Politics » on 19 Sep 2012 at 1:02 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



64 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-19 10:35:09 AM
I am not shocked that this happens.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-09-19 10:46:05 AM
Wow. The conspiracy wackos on the lunatic fringe are getting even crazier as they realize that they are about to lose.

I almost expect these right wing writers to simply start barking and howling soon.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-09-19 10:47:14 AM

EnviroDude: I am not shocked that this happens.


I'm not shocked that you would take Pajamas media seriously.
 
2012-09-19 10:47:54 AM
I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?
 
2012-09-19 10:56:06 AM

Marcus Aurelius: I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?


After the first five paragraphs did nothing but talk about Nazi Germany, I lost interest in finding out what the actual controversy is supposed to be.
 
2012-09-19 11:44:57 AM

kronicfeld: Marcus Aurelius: I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?

After the first five paragraphs did nothing but talk about Nazi Germany, I lost interest in finding out what the actual controversy is supposed to be.


He went from Nazi's to Media Matters, and by that point my eyerolls made further reading impossible.
 
2012-09-19 11:54:11 AM
PJ Media - we write shiat without getting out of bed we're so lazy.

I stopped after I saw the reference to Nazi Germany in the first paragraph.
 
2012-09-19 12:30:23 PM

vartian: kronicfeld: Marcus Aurelius: I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?

After the first five paragraphs did nothing but talk about Nazi Germany, I lost interest in finding out what the actual controversy is supposed to be.

He went from Nazi's to Media Matters, and by that point my eyerolls made further reading impossible.


It's an even more hysterical repeat of this.

Which Fark covered here.
 
2012-09-19 12:42:17 PM
Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.
 
2012-09-19 12:57:43 PM
I like an article that immediately Godwins itself, saves time.
 
2012-09-19 01:04:53 PM

Barfmaker: I like an article that immediately Godwins itself, saves time.


Oddly enough, your username sums up PJM's entire website very well.
 
2012-09-19 01:05:15 PM
Your blog sucks.
 
2012-09-19 01:05:19 PM
Holy shiat, is that unhinged.
 
2012-09-19 01:05:41 PM

Marcus Aurelius: I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?


Hitler used brownshirts and Obama is a brown person.
 
2012-09-19 01:06:36 PM
So, is this the right's coping mechanism after having come to terms with Mitt's inevitable loss?
 
2012-09-19 01:10:03 PM
The Modern GOP:
2.bp.blogspot.com

The evidence is crystal clear that DOJ WAS poltiicized and use for poltical dirty tricks (look at what US Attorney Bradley Schlozman tried to to to Claire McCaskill in 2008), but that happened during the BUSH adminstration and was finally fixed after Obama took over

thanks for playing
 
2012-09-19 01:11:02 PM

Walker: Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.


I like how the submitter couldn't decide whether the ending punctuation should be a question mark or a period, so he/she left it off entirely.
 
2012-09-19 01:12:07 PM
DSM-V needs to look at adding "modern conservatism".
 
2012-09-19 01:12:36 PM
I love that Pajamas Media has that "PJ Media" logo now. It's like they think you'll click because, hey, that surely couldn't be that shiatty Pajamas Media blog, now could it?
 
2012-09-19 01:13:02 PM
Guys, it's OK when Democrats use the Department of Justice to attack the free press. It's only bad when Republicans do it. If you think otherwise, that makes you racist.

upload.wikimedia.org

Seine papir, bitte,
 
2012-09-19 01:18:41 PM

Walker: Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.


www.dudelol.com
 
2012-09-19 01:19:30 PM

beta_plus: Guys, it's OK when Democrats use the Department of Justice to attack the free press


That would be horrible, actually.

Let me know if it ever happens.
 
2012-09-19 01:23:18 PM
3 paragraphs of Godwin and lardface still hides behind an IBD quote to say what he really wants to say.
 
2012-09-19 01:24:55 PM
It gets worse. The Lamestream MSM media socio-facist propaganda machines of the New York Times, CNN, NPR, etc. even get their own seats at the White House. Madness!

They might as well let Al Jazeera in and get it over with.
 
2012-09-19 01:29:35 PM
Can somebody post the .jpeg with Ronald McDonald reading the upside down book thinking "WTF am I reading?"? That would describe my feelings perfectly.
 
2012-09-19 01:40:53 PM
"I DON'T RECALL."
 
2012-09-19 01:43:17 PM
So this whole insane tirade is based on two things:

1. the Justice Department says things to the press that make them look good
2. the press asks the Justice Department to comment to statements by critics

QED, Nazis
 
2012-09-19 01:46:26 PM

beta_plus: it's OK when Democrats use the Department of Justice to attack the free press. It's only bad when Republicans do it


zombieresearchsociety.com

Forever the victim
 
2012-09-19 01:48:45 PM
In the days following the Night of the Long Knives in 1934,

Wow, didn't even wait for the Godwin effect to... uh... take effect.

Anyway, yea, that plus 'goons'... stopped reading.
 
2012-09-19 01:54:35 PM

beta_plus: Guys, it's OK when Democrats use the Department of Justice to attack the free press. It's only bad when Republicans do it. If you think otherwise, that makes you racist.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 220x275]

Seine papir, bitte,


Define "attack" as you used it above.
 
2012-09-19 01:54:49 PM

vpb: EnviroDude: I am not shocked that this happens.

I'm not shocked that you would take Pajamas media seriously.


I like their coverage compared to Bikini Brief Media.
 
2012-09-19 02:01:26 PM
Alritght, I says to myself, I haven't actually read a PJmedia piece in a while. Maybe they've changed a bit in the last year. I can't always tune out the other side. Let's see what's going on.....

........In the days following the Night of the Long Knives in 1934, a bizarre press conference took place in Berlin. Hermann Goering stood before the foreign press corps and explained why Hitler's regime had the obligation to murder hundreds of Germans in the dead of night without due process.

*sigh*. Maybe next year will be better.
 
2012-09-19 02:04:20 PM
I didn't RTFA, but if I made a guess that they did NOT present any factual evidence, would I win a prize?
 
2012-09-19 02:12:56 PM
God, the far right is getting ludicrously, hilariously, derp-tacularly desperate. Time to dust this off...
img.photobucket.com
 
2012-09-19 02:13:26 PM

dinch: I didn't RTFA, but if I made a guess that they did NOT present any factual evidence, would I win a prize?


No, they provided factual 'evidence'. The problem is that it is evidence of media matters asking the DOJ's head of the Office of Public Affairs (OPA) for information available, apparently, to the public. *gasp!* Media Matters then used it to write a piece with factual information that was unflattering to the right-wing authors of the nonsense being refuted.

This is what right-wingers call 'collusion' between the lamestream msm government 0bama media and his own DOJ to 'attack' them.

So, you know, butthurt, butthurt everywhere!
 
2012-09-19 02:14:23 PM

SacriliciousBeerSwiller: God, the far right is getting ludicrously, hilariously, derp-tacularly desperate. Time to dust this off...
[img.photobucket.com image 450x360]


Hmm... I've been spelling that wrong all this time. I think I've been throwing an 'e' on the end of it.
 
2012-09-19 02:16:49 PM

jake_lex: I love that Pajamas Media has that "PJ Media" logo now. It's like they think you'll click because, hey, that surely couldn't be that shiatty Pajamas Media blog, now could it?


I also like the little globe logo. They probably think it makes them look all media-elite and stuff, rather than the reality that it makes them look like one of those Judeo-Christian fundy whackjob sites.
 
2012-09-19 02:22:14 PM
So.... seriously, what is this 'illegal' tactic?
 
2012-09-19 02:36:43 PM

Walker: Let me axe you a question


www.fiftiesweb.com

SUUUUUPRIZE SUPRIZE SUPRIZE!
 
2012-09-19 02:45:48 PM
i568.photobucket.com
 
2012-09-19 02:57:30 PM
J. Christian Adams the author of this, is the same lying POS former DOJ employee who basically accused that one Black Panther guy at the polling station in Philly of single-handedly terrorizing White conservative voters at an inner-city majority Black voting district, thus throwing the election to Obama (*terrorist fist bump*) and that the whole affair was covered up by Holder and the other racists in Obama's administration.

Well, not really of course, but that's basically the shiat he's been selling to every crappy whiny right-wing blog who will print his lies. The man is a partisan asshole times 1000, and but for Karl Rove and GWB, had no business being anywhere near the DOJ in the first place.

Link

J. Christian Adams: Remember this asshat's name, because he's not going away anytime soon. :/ 

Related: Excellent article on how the Bush administration stocked the Justice Department with unqualified, highly partisan judges like Adams, chosen only for their ideology: Link
 
2012-09-19 02:57:55 PM
Standard Chicago politics. Why would anyone be surprised?
 
2012-09-19 03:02:58 PM
PJ media alleges a conspiracy without citation to back their assertions.

Meanwhile, between 2001 and 2006, nearly 1000 cases were brought by DOJ against state and local functionaires. 87% of which were brought against Democrats.

Project Save Justice Part 1 - Karl Rove's Persecutions
 
2012-09-19 03:15:27 PM

vpb: Wow. The conspiracy wackos on the lunatic fringe are getting even crazier as they realize that they are about to lose.

I almost expect these right wing writers to simply start barking and howling soon.


Case in point riiiight above this post.
 
2012-09-19 03:25:51 PM

X-boxershorts: Meanwhile, between 2001 and 2006, nearly 1000 cases were brought by DOJ against state and local functionaires. 87% of which were brought against Democrats.


I do not recall that.
 
2012-09-19 03:56:28 PM

Marcus Aurelius: I won't click the link, but can someone fill me in on what an "illegal tactic" is? And does it involve much butthurt?


Cut blocking.
 
2012-09-19 03:59:10 PM

Walker: Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.


Supposably we got an intellectual up in here!
 
2012-09-19 04:16:07 PM
HERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP
 
2012-09-19 04:16:09 PM

BSABSVR: Walker: Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.

Supposably we got an intellectual up in here!


He's acting like he's a one-man libary.
 
2012-09-19 04:20:33 PM

Walker: Why can't people spell "surprise"? There's an "r" before the "p" people. SUR-prise. Or are you one of those people who pronounce it "SA-prise"? Let me axe you a question.


I say Sa prise and spell it surprise.

My friend just messaged me "Not to suprising" So I suspect it is a pretty common misspelling :)
 
Displayed 50 of 64 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report