If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Blaze)   For a debate that will sure be as exciting and thrilling as a Ross Perot TV special, Bill O'Reilly and Jon Stewart will engage in 90-minute debate   (theblaze.com) divider line 13
    More: Interesting, television special  
•       •       •

2254 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Sep 2012 at 12:57 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-09-18 01:13:52 PM
4 votes:
So it's a debate between a bad co median who has sold out to an ideological agenda and poses as a news anchor versus Jon Stewart? Should be funny, if nothing else.
2012-09-18 02:02:04 PM
2 votes:
Will they f*cking do it live?
2012-09-18 01:28:50 PM
2 votes:

pontechango: O'REILLY: I'll tell you why [religion's] not a scam, in my opinion: tide goes in, tide goes out. Never a miscommunication. You can't explain that.

SILVERMAN: Tide goes in, tide goes out?

O'REILLY: See, the water, the tide comes in and it goes out, Mr. Silverman. It always comes in, and always goes out. You can't explain that.


28.media.tumblr.com
2012-09-18 01:03:03 PM
2 votes:

Lost Thought 00: Sad part is that it will be fully scripted by writers to provide the appropriate outcome. Plus, they really are friends and are unlikely to get exceptionally aggressive towards each other.


What I want to see is Colbert vs Bachmann.
2012-09-18 12:59:07 PM
2 votes:

timujin: I am, DamnYankees, they're both very intelligent men with diametrically opposed viewpoints, though they both have a decent level of respect for each other. I feel O'Reilly is more willing to be disingenuous, but Stewart has no problem in calling him on it.


You can't explain that.
2012-09-18 04:16:49 PM
1 votes:

Citrate1007: Madbassist1: Citrate1007: While Cobert is funnier, Stewart is more versed in debate and isn't restricted by the character that Steven has to portray.

To be fair, Colbert's character has swung majorly to the left. Its subtle, but if you didnt know he was supposed to be a right-wing idiot, you wouldnt be able to tell it...He'd just be an idiot.

Im sure they couldnt keep up with the writing.

I argue that the Colbert character didn't swing, it is just that the right-wing of the GOP is starting to make his character seem like a moderate.


I...I...shall have to ponder this on the tree of woe...
2012-09-18 04:02:15 PM
1 votes:
So Oreilly, the guy who doesn't even know why tides go in and out is going to take on J-Stew?

All Stewie has to do is ask him stuff like how many times does the Earth go around the sun per year, or who is buried in Grant's tomb.
2012-09-18 03:12:22 PM
1 votes:

Gotfire: I would rather see John Stewart vs. Hannity.


i280.photobucket.com
2012-09-18 02:38:46 PM
1 votes:

Madbassist1: Citrate1007: While Cobert is funnier, Stewart is more versed in debate and isn't restricted by the character that Steven has to portray.

To be fair, Colbert's character has swung majorly to the left. Its subtle, but if you didnt know he was supposed to be a right-wing idiot, you wouldnt be able to tell it...He'd just be an idiot.

Im sure they couldnt keep up with the writing.


I argue that the Colbert character didn't swing, it is just that the right-wing of the GOP is starting to make his character seem like a moderate.
2012-09-18 02:17:27 PM
1 votes:

Aracnix: lysdexic: ExperianScaresCthulhu: intelligent comment below: Who cares? neither of them are running for office or dictating policy. Both will go on rants and O'Reilly will never directly answer tough questions. It's just a circle jerk for both sides. Get them to be moderators at a Presidential debate, that means something.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(/ ̄(エ) ̄)/ \( ̄(エ) ̄)/ ヽ( ̄(エ) ̄)ノ

Your repeating bears need consistency.


t( ̄(エ) ̄)/ t( ̄(エ) ̄)/ t( ̄(エ) ̄)ノ
2012-09-18 01:15:17 PM
1 votes:

ExperianScaresCthulhu: intelligent comment below: Who cares? neither of them are running for office or dictating policy. Both will go on rants and O'Reilly will never directly answer tough questions. It's just a circle jerk for both sides. Get them to be moderators at a Presidential debate, that means something.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


(/ ̄(エ) ̄)/ \( ̄(エ) ̄)/ ヽ( ̄(エ) ̄)ノ
2012-09-18 01:03:05 PM
1 votes:
Ross Perot might not have been interesting but he warned us what was going to happen, he was ridiculed for it, and then it happened. And still no one gives him credit.

timiacono.com
2012-09-18 01:01:31 PM
1 votes:

DamnYankees: For some reason I'm not really looking forward to this.


It'll be boring and predictable, with both sides going for the lols rather than actually debating policy.

"You libs with your hippies and lazy"
"No, you cons with your fascism and dancing horses"
"How dare you"
"How dare YOU"
 
Displayed 13 of 13 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report