slimfast: [i49.tinypic.com image 575x779]
EatTheWorld: [imageshack.us image 575x779]
whidbey: ArcadianRefugee: whidbey: incite"Go kill an American!" --inciting violence"Muslims are a bunch of sandy-vagina'd pedophile worshippers." --a derogatory statement of fact or opinion, NOT an incitation of violence no matter how much sand some people may have in their vaginas regarding their pedophile prophetSeriously, the fact that you continue to insist the two are equatable marks you as an idiot or a persistent troll.Not either, but again it's obvious that no one in here has the least bit of understanding of what the consequences of that movie were. Including you.
arobb00: I_C_Weener: [i586.photobucket.com image 588x535]What in the blue hell is that on the far left? man? Woman? Bieber???
Betep: AngryWhiteMale: hinten: Angry, in and at their pants.[www.gunslot.com image 479x386]I want that shirt! I'll take the blonde as well.http://www.landoverbaptist.org/You might like some of the women folk there too.
thomps: Timmy the Tumor: I think we should send a sh*tload of beard trimmers over there as humanitarian aid. Maybe if all of these guys' faces didn't look like nutsacks, they would be in a better mood.you should take better care of your nutsack if it looks like a muslim dude's bearded face.
whidbey: Nabb1: whidbey: The magazine covers are kind of funny, the "conservative humor" in here is somewhat offensive, but really, the unacceptable violence from the Muslim community does not get the sh*thead who made the movie off the hook.Sorry if that makes a few of you mad.Nah, not mad. I just feel sorry for your fear.No fear here. Just rightly pissed that bigotry and hatred get a free pass under the monicker of "free speech."
hinten: skullkrusher: hinten: whidbey: I_C_Weener: Good job to those of you who showed up with your sense of humor. Better luck next time to those that left their's in the politics tab.Because we're supposed to laugh and make captions for the "hijinks" of people exercising legitimate grievances at offensive material produced from this country. They're the ones we should be ridiculing. Got it.I don't remember you being such an ass. What happened?you took a break from Fark and forgot some stuff about people?I refuse to use Favorite with notes because I find it hard to believe that you can capture someone with a one-liner. Of course I am wrong. Fark is the playground of one dimensional characters.
violentsalvation: whidbey: Nabb1: whidbey: Yeah actually there is. You should look up the legal definition of "obscene."Oh, and what is the legal definition of "obscene" and how does this particular film fit it?The Miller Test states one of the conditions be that a work be "utterly without redeeming social value."Every one of your posts in this thread meet that definition.
WTF Indeed: Newsweak should just be renamed "The Niall Ferguson Looks Down At You Unwashed Masses Wogs" Weekly.
Serious Post on Serious Thread: Whid's dude, your comments come up in 'generally smart comment' green, but you are seriously jumping the shark here. to the point that dumb fark 'comments in grey' brigade is actually appearing more intelligent by comparison. That is not good.
cegorach: You twats invaded two nations on false pretexts and are still there a decade on, countless thousands dead.
whidbey: Serious Post on Serious Thread: Whid's dude, your comments come up in 'generally smart comment' green, but you are seriously jumping the shark here. to the point that dumb fark 'comments in grey' brigade is actually appearing more intelligent by comparison. That is not good.OMG I'm farking quaking in my boots.From a legal standpoint, it's not even close. Saying something you think, hell, know, is going to piss someone off is not anywhere near the same thing as urging people to commit immediate acts of violence. The fact you would think this should be anywhere near a court is farked up.Your opinion.That thinking provides what the law would call a "perverse incentive". Ie, anybody who wants to shut down any speech just has to get violent and boom, your formulation of resposibility means the author should be put in jail.I said nothing of the kind. Reread my posts if you have any questions about my intention.you wanna start bowing to the whims of every nutbag country that has fundie assholes that maight riot b/c we 'allow' our women to wear bikinis, or artists to draw Mohammed, whatever other cave man shiat they think is a legit reason to kill?No, it looks like I "wanna start bowing" to the whims of Americans who want to protect the kind of bigotry presented in the film. At least if I want to fit in around here.You aren't going to bully me, funny sounding alt. ;-p
colon_pow: [xspblog.com image 448x336]leave Whidbey alone!!!
Want more stories with less ads? Try
It's what the cool kids are doing.It's also how we pay the bills.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Nov 23 2017 04:59:28
Runtime: 0.706 sec (706 ms)