If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu urges the United States to draw a "red line" that Iran cannot cross - which President Barack Obama last week reportedly rejected even though Red is his favorite color   (articles.cnn.com) divider line 304
    More: Sad, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, obama, United States, Iran, Benjamin Netanyahu, pre-emptive strike, red  
•       •       •

1013 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 Sep 2012 at 1:10 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



304 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-17 04:26:31 PM

Amos Quito: badaboom: "Those who think they can revive the stinking corpse of the usurping and fake Israeli regime by throwing a birthday party are seriously mistaken."

"Today the reason for the Zionist regime's existence is questioned, and this regime is on its way to annihilation.... (Israel) has reached the end like a dead rat after being slapped by the Lebanese."

(Remarks on Israel's Independence Day, as quoted by Iran's official IRNA news agency)

June 3, 2007

"With God's help, the countdown button for the destruction of the Zionist regime has been pushed by the hands of the children of Lebanon and Palestine . . . By God's will, we will witness the destruction of this regime in the near future."
(Speech, as quoted by the Fars News Agency)

"A new Middle East will definitely take shape, but with the grace of God and the help of the nations in this new Middle East, there will be no American or Zionist presence in it."

(Speech in Tehran marking annual Iran Quds Day protest against Israel's existence)

October 26, 2005

"Israel must be wiped off the map ... The establishment of a Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world . . . The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of the war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land."

(In an address to 4,000 students at a program titled, 'The World Without Zionism')



For your edification:

regime [ruh-zheem, rey-, or, sometimes, -jeem] Show IPA
noun
1. a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime.
2. a ruling or prevailing system.
3. a government in power.
4. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power.


Understanding what words mean can be helpful.


What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis
 
2012-09-17 04:27:44 PM
Amos Quito

karnal: Lionel Mandrake


badaboom: Except Iran has made their intentions quite clear.

Maybe Israel should do something about that.

Why should we?


I agree with this.....but Israel needs to know if they protect themselves from Iran with a pre-emptive strike, that someone will have their backs when the rest of the Middle East comes after them.


First, it won't be a "preemptive strike", it will be naked aggression. Israel has been "crying wolf" over Iran, their "imminent nuclear capability" and the "existential threat" it poses for TWENTY YEARS.

Second, the reason that there is fear of RETALIATION in the form of Iran crippling traffic in the Strait of Hormuz is that the US, Europe, and all of the other suckers that have been listening to Israel's whine ARE cooperating - levying horrendous sanctions, and implying cooperation in the attack.

That is why we are also seen as targets.

Does any of this remind you of the lies about Iraq fed to the West by Israel's Mossadniks prior to Gulf War II?

Yeah. Lies then, lies now.

Who was the primary beneficiary of Iraq being "tamed"?

Who will be the primary beneficiary if we attack Iran?


If we did it right, we would also benefit from it.....if we would have handled Iraq correctly we would be sitting on something like 200 billion bbl of oil....and with Iran literally floating on a giant ocean of oil, the benefits there would be substantial. If we take the time and money to invade, the least we could do is claim the oil rights...especially since we discovered most of it to begin with.
 
2012-09-17 04:28:41 PM

badaboom: Amos Quito: karnal: Lionel Mandrake


badaboom: Except Iran has made their intentions quite clear.

Maybe Israel should do something about that.

Why should we?


I agree with this.....but Israel needs to know if they protect themselves from Iran with a pre-emptive strike, that someone will have their backs when the rest of the Middle East comes after them.


First, it won't be a "preemptive strike", it will be naked aggression. Israel has been "crying wolf" over Iran, their "imminent nuclear capability" and the "existential threat" it poses for TWENTY YEARS.

Second, the reason that there is fear of RETALIATION in the form of Iran crippling traffic in the Strait of Hormuz is that the US, Europe, and all of the other suckers that have been listening to Israel's whine ARE cooperating - levying horrendous sanctions, and implying cooperation in the attack.

That is why we are also seen as targets.

Does any of this remind you of the lies about Iraq fed to the West by Israel's Mossadniks prior to Gulf War II?

Yeah. Lies then, lies now.

Who was the primary beneficiary of Iraq being "tamed"?

Who will be the primary beneficiary if we attack Iran?

[berkeley.intel-research.net image 410x307]



LULZ!

The attack on Iraq was a substantial benefit to Israel. Would you like a quote where Netanyahu says the same?

Would you like to read a quote where John "The Mustache" Bolton promises Ariel Sharon that once the US is finished with Iraq, we would attack Libya, Iran and Syria?

That was 2003. 

And they said all the prophets were dead.
 
2012-09-17 04:29:44 PM

neongoats: beta_plus: Parthenogenetic: karnal: Why do liberals hate Israel and Jews so much? You know who else hated Jews? This guy:
[www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk image 165x267]
Democrats are in good company.

Meh. You forgot to mention that "Nazi" is a contraction of "Nationalsozialismus", that liberals are socialists, and therefore liberalism is fascism.

Also, both sides are bad, so vote Republican.

Israel and Islamic nations are both equally bad, so let muslims murder american diplomats!

LET? What should we do, swing our dick and start invading every county that protests the US?

Moron.


Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.

/Hope & Change!
 
2012-09-17 04:31:47 PM

karnal: If we did it right, we would also benefit from it.....if we would have handled Iraq correctly we would be sitting on something like 200 billion bbl of oil....and with Iran literally floating on a giant ocean of oil, the benefits there would be substantial. If we take the time and money to invade, the least we could do is claim the oil rights...especially since we discovered most of it to begin with.


OK, now that HAD to be sarcasm. Right?

/right?
 
2012-09-17 04:32:12 PM

Amos Quito: badaboom: Amos Quito: karnal: Lionel Mandrake


badaboom: Except Iran has made their intentions quite clear.

Maybe Israel should do something about that.

Why should we?


I agree with this.....but Israel needs to know if they protect themselves from Iran with a pre-emptive strike, that someone will have their backs when the rest of the Middle East comes after them.


First, it won't be a "preemptive strike", it will be naked aggression. Israel has been "crying wolf" over Iran, their "imminent nuclear capability" and the "existential threat" it poses for TWENTY YEARS.

Second, the reason that there is fear of RETALIATION in the form of Iran crippling traffic in the Strait of Hormuz is that the US, Europe, and all of the other suckers that have been listening to Israel's whine ARE cooperating - levying horrendous sanctions, and implying cooperation in the attack.

That is why we are also seen as targets.

Does any of this remind you of the lies about Iraq fed to the West by Israel's Mossadniks prior to Gulf War II?

Yeah. Lies then, lies now.

Who was the primary beneficiary of Iraq being "tamed"?

Who will be the primary beneficiary if we attack Iran?

[berkeley.intel-research.net image 410x307]


LULZ!

The attack on Iraq was a substantial benefit to Israel. Would you like a quote where Netanyahu says the same?

Would you like to read a quote where John "The Mustache" Bolton promises Ariel Sharon that once the US is finished with Iraq, we would attack Libya, Iran and Syria?

That was 2003. 

And they said all the prophets were dead.


And our attack on Germany was a substantial benefit to France and England. What's your point?
 
2012-09-17 04:33:21 PM
"Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor told Israel Radio the United States should not wait for Iran to decide on building a bomb before it considers military action."

What does that even farking mean? "We're not sure if Iran wants to build a bomb or not, but you better bomb them anyway before they decide what they're going to do"?

These officials are some of the worst communicators imaginable. How about Netanyahu's statement that the Iranians are "six months or so away from being 90% of the way toward creating a nuclear weapon"? What the fark does that MEAN??
 
2012-09-17 04:33:48 PM

beta_plus: Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.


I believe he was arrested for violating terms of his probation.

But you knew that already, didn't you?
 
2012-09-17 04:38:24 PM

beta_plus: Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.


When you have to lie or omit information to prove your point, you've already lost in an honest exchange of ideas. If you have to abandon truth to get what you want, you probably shouldn't have what you want.
 
2012-09-17 04:38:58 PM

beta_plus: neongoats: beta_plus: Parthenogenetic: karnal: Why do liberals hate Israel and Jews so much? You know who else hated Jews? This guy:
[www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk image 165x267]
Democrats are in good company.

Meh. You forgot to mention that "Nazi" is a contraction of "Nationalsozialismus", that liberals are socialists, and therefore liberalism is fascism.

Also, both sides are bad, so vote Republican.

Israel and Islamic nations are both equally bad, so let muslims murder american diplomats!

LET? What should we do, swing our dick and start invading every county that protests the US?

Moron.

Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.

/Hope & Change!


Hey look! Another "conservative" referencing something that didn't happen!
 
2012-09-17 04:49:43 PM
anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?
 
2012-09-17 04:51:10 PM

Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?


I'm gonna need a citation for that Ariel Sharon quote.
 
2012-09-17 04:51:50 PM

Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?


And there you go, from the horse's mouth - they are what we thought they were.
 
2012-09-17 04:52:57 PM

badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis



The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.
 
2012-09-17 04:54:10 PM

Lionel Mandrake: beta_plus: neongoats: beta_plus: Parthenogenetic: karnal: Why do liberals hate Israel and Jews so much? You know who else hated Jews? This guy:
[www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk image 165x267]
Democrats are in good company.

Meh. You forgot to mention that "Nazi" is a contraction of "Nationalsozialismus", that liberals are socialists, and therefore liberalism is fascism.

Also, both sides are bad, so vote Republican.

Israel and Islamic nations are both equally bad, so let muslims murder american diplomats!

LET? What should we do, swing our dick and start invading every county that protests the US?

Moron.

Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.

/Hope & Change!

Hey look! Another "conservative" referencing something that didn't happen!


About as bad ad all the Libs who believe the riots are about the movie and have nothing to do with the United States. Or that this is "spontaneous" protest against an anti-Islam film
 
2012-09-17 04:56:54 PM

Insatiable Jesus: Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?

And there you go, from the horse's mouth - they are what we thought they were.


Careful, quick draw.
 
2012-09-17 04:57:33 PM

Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.


And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?
 
2012-09-17 04:58:26 PM

PsiChick: DeltaPunch: DeltaPunch: Look, I understand his concerns and I certainly hope we can work together moving forward, but I really wish he'd just STFU and keep his nose out of our erections.

holy fark I really typed that didn't I? ELECTIONS....

/shouldn't type before coffee
//*grumble*

And yet it was the best comment here.


goodcomics.comicbookresources.com
 
2012-09-17 05:00:25 PM

badaboom: And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?



Where did the Nazis go? They had men, women and children there too.

Evil is evil and should be exterminated on sight.
 
2012-09-17 05:03:35 PM

badaboom: Lionel Mandrake: beta_plus: neongoats: beta_plus: Parthenogenetic: karnal: Why do liberals hate Israel and Jews so much? You know who else hated Jews? This guy:
[www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk image 165x267]
Democrats are in good company.

Meh. You forgot to mention that "Nazi" is a contraction of "Nationalsozialismus", that liberals are socialists, and therefore liberalism is fascism.

Also, both sides are bad, so vote Republican.

Israel and Islamic nations are both equally bad, so let muslims murder american diplomats!

LET? What should we do, swing our dick and start invading every county that protests the US?

Moron.

Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.

/Hope & Change!

Hey look! Another "conservative" referencing something that didn't happen!

About as bad ad all the Libs who believe the riots are about the movie and have nothing to do with the United States. Or that this is "spontaneous" protest against an anti-Islam film


1) b-b-b-b-but!!1! arguments are lame
2) no one I know thinks that. The movie may been a spark for the powderkeg, but no one thinks it's 100% because of the stupid film
 
2012-09-17 05:05:34 PM
4.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-09-17 05:05:55 PM

Insatiable Jesus: badaboom: And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


Where did the Nazis go? They had men, women and children there too.

Evil is evil and should be exterminated on sight.


Thank Goodness Americans are pure and good. would be terrible if anyone thought we should be exterminated on sight.
 
2012-09-17 05:08:31 PM

Amos Quito: The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl


You really expect an understanding of history will effect the views of the modern conservative?
 
2012-09-17 05:10:03 PM

Lionel Mandrake: badaboom: Lionel Mandrake: beta_plus: neongoats: beta_plus: Parthenogenetic: karnal: Why do liberals hate Israel and Jews so much? You know who else hated Jews? This guy:
[www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk image 165x267]
Democrats are in good company.

Meh. You forgot to mention that "Nazi" is a contraction of "Nationalsozialismus", that liberals are socialists, and therefore liberalism is fascism.

Also, both sides are bad, so vote Republican.

Israel and Islamic nations are both equally bad, so let muslims murder american diplomats!

LET? What should we do, swing our dick and start invading every county that protests the US?

Moron.

Yeah, we'll just arrest people for posting videos on youtube instead.

/Hope & Change!

Hey look! Another "conservative" referencing something that didn't happen!

About as bad ad all the Libs who believe the riots are about the movie and have nothing to do with the United States. Or that this is "spontaneous" protest against an anti-Islam film

1) b-b-b-b-but!!1! arguments are lame
2) no one I know thinks that. The movie may been a spark for the powderkeg, but no one thinks it's 100% because of the stupid film


No one except the administration but I guess that does not count

A deadly assault on a U.S. consulate in Libya was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Sunday, even as Libya's president insisted the attackers spent months preparing and carefully choosing their date - the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Link
 
2012-09-17 05:10:41 PM
 
2012-09-17 05:11:48 PM

Insatiable Jesus: badaboom: And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


Where did the Nazis go? They had men, women and children there too.

Evil is evil and should be exterminated on sight.


Huh? You are suggesting Israel is evil and should be exterminated? I hope I read that wrong.
 
2012-09-17 05:12:04 PM

Philip Francis Queeg: Insatiable Jesus: badaboom: And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


Where did the Nazis go? They had men, women and children there too.

Evil is evil and should be exterminated on sight.

Thank Goodness Americans are pure and good. would be terrible if anyone thought we should be exterminated on sight.



Get back to me when "Americans" have a 3000 year history of farking over everybody around them in the most insidious of ways.
 
2012-09-17 05:12:09 PM

indylaw: Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?

I'm gonna need a citation for that Ariel Sharon quote.



I can't comment on the accuracy of the above, but here's another Sharon quote that - in hindsight - validates the point:


Sharon says U.S. should also disarm Iran, Libya and Syria

Haaretz - Feb.18, 2003

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq. "These are irresponsible states, which must be disarmed of weapons mass destruction, and a successful American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve," Sharon said to a visiting delegation of American congressmen.

Sharon told the congressmen that Israel was not involved in the war with Iraq "but the American action is of vital importance."

In a meeting with U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton yesterday, Sharon said that Israel was concerned about the security threat posed by Iran, and stressed that it was important to deal with Iran even while American attention was focused on Iraq.

Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials that he had no doubt America would attack Iraq, and that it would be necessary thereafter to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea.

END QUOTE

Remember, this was 2003

Libya? Gone
Syria? Waving goodbye
Iran? Who's next?

When Izzy goes tizzy, Uncle Sam gets busy!


/North Korea? WTF?
 
2012-09-17 05:13:56 PM

badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.

And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?



mycatbirdseat.com

Helen had some ideas
 
2012-09-17 05:14:10 PM

Insatiable Jesus: Philip Francis Queeg: Insatiable Jesus: badaboom: And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


Where did the Nazis go? They had men, women and children there too.

Evil is evil and should be exterminated on sight.

Thank Goodness Americans are pure and good. would be terrible if anyone thought we should be exterminated on sight.


Get back to me when "Americans" have a 3000 year history of farking over everybody around them in the most insidious of ways.


Yeah, we've only been farking everyone around us over for for 235 years.
 
2012-09-17 05:15:13 PM

Hobodeluxe: Mother Jones might have just performed the Coup de grâce on the Romney campaign.


I'm not sure I agree with that assessment, but the idea that Romney thinks the 47 (or whatever) percent that pay no (federal) income tax all support Obama is about as laughable a concept as anything I can imagine.
 
2012-09-17 05:15:15 PM

Amos Quito: indylaw: Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?

I'm gonna need a citation for that Ariel Sharon quote.


I can't comment on the accuracy of the above, but here's another Sharon quote that - in hindsight - validates the point:


Sharon says U.S. should also disarm Iran, Libya and Syria

Haaretz - Feb.18, 2003

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq. "These are irresponsible states, which must be disarmed of weapons mass destruction, and a successful American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve," Sharon said to a visiting delegation of American congressmen.

Sharon told the congressmen that Israel was not involved in the war with Iraq "but the American action is of vital importance."

In a meeting with U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton yesterday, Sharon said that Israel was concerned about the security threat posed by Iran, and stressed that it was important to deal with Iran even while American attention was focused on Iraq.

Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials that he had no doubt America would attack Iraq, and that it would be necessary thereafter to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea.

END QUOTE

Remember, this was 2003

Libya? Gone
Syria? Waving goodbye
Iran? Who's next?

When Izzy goes tizzy, Uncle Sam gets busy!


/North Korea? WTF?


How does this post even remotely support what was in the pictured quote?
 
2012-09-17 05:16:04 PM

badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.

And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


They could just stay where they are and get used to the idea of being Palestinian Jews instead of Israelis.
 
2012-09-17 05:17:37 PM

Amos Quito: badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.

And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


[mycatbirdseat.com image 175x235]

Helen had some ideas


Amos Quito: badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.

And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?


[mycatbirdseat.com image 175x235]

Helen had some ideas


Glad we are getting down to your racist core beliefs.
 
2012-09-17 05:19:35 PM

badaboom: No one except the administration but I guess that does not count

A deadly assault on a U.S. consulate in Libya was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Sunday, even as Libya's president insisted the attackers spent months preparing and carefully choosing their date - the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.


Well, I disagree, and everyone I know does, too. I don't think that position will stand.

I'll still take it over a macho-man, tough-guy response
 
2012-09-17 05:19:57 PM

Holocaust Agnostic: badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: What's your point? Destroy the regime but leave the people alone? Hmm...wonder what would happen to the Jews if the Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas was in charge of the land. I'm sure they wouldn't harm any Israelis


The problem started over 100 years ago when Theodor Herzl and his pals set their minds to carving out a chunk of Palestine for Jews - most of whom were contentedly living in Europe at the time, their families never having never set foot anywhere near the place in hundreds and hundreds of years.

Most Jews wanted no part of the scheme - and for good reason: ZIONISM WAS A BAD IDEA. It was a bad idea then, and it's a bad idea now. The Zionist "struggle" has brought NOTHING but heartache, death, suffering and trouble - not only for the other residents of the entire region, but for the Jews, who were at first conned, and then FORCED into moving into that perpetually hostile place.

Stupid squirrel sets up housekeeping in a farking HORNET'S NEST, and then whines incessantly that it is constantly under the threat of being stung.

Israel is a snowball in hell, and eventually, the heat will have its effect. The only question is how much damage will be done as she melts.

Zionism is not and never has been "good for the Jews", let alone anyone else.

And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?

They could just stay where they are and get used to the idea of being Palestinian Jews instead of Israelis.


Except if given the choice of remaining an Israeli Arab or a Palestinian Arab more would prefer to remain Israeli.
 
2012-09-17 05:21:54 PM

Lionel Mandrake: badaboom: No one except the administration but I guess that does not count

A deadly assault on a U.S. consulate in Libya was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Sunday, even as Libya's president insisted the attackers spent months preparing and carefully choosing their date - the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Well, I disagree, and everyone I know does, too. I don't think that position will stand.

I'll still take it over a macho-man, tough-guy response


Not looking for a macho man response. Just looking for an honest one. In this case, the administration continues to fark the movie chicken. Having the story be Muslims still hate us even with Obama is not good for reelection campaign.
 
2012-09-17 05:26:55 PM

Holocaust Agnostic: badaboom:And yet they live there NOW. Living, breathing human beings. Cry all you want about conspiracy and evil world domination of the Jews. Fact is Israel exists and there are men/woman/children who live there. Where do you suggest they go?

They could just stay where they are and get used to the idea of being Palestinian Jews instead of Israelis.


I'll agree with badaboom in one respect... what you suggested is not a realistic option. At this point, if the nation of Israel somehow goes away, jews that live in that area will never be safe. I understand what you are saying... that perhaps never creating a 'nation of Israel' in '48 (or whatever) would probably have been the best decision, but that didn't happen and thinking that Israel could be disbanded and go back to the way things were before '48 is wishful thinking at best. If Israel falls, there will be genocide (again) for sure. If we're going to stop genocide, we might as well support Israel as it stands today... at least as far as 'support' means 'preventing the country from being eliminated'. I'm 100% against Israel dictating US middle-east policy, but there really isn't much choice but supporting the state of Israel at this point. That doesn't mean preemptively attacking Iran by any means, but it is what it is.
 
2012-09-17 05:27:35 PM

badaboom: Helen had some ideas

Glad we are getting down to your racist core beliefs.



Glad you're being reduced to name-calling.

Look, the state that was birthed by the racist Zionist scheme is doomed to bite the weenie.

Jews simply can't breed fast enough to fight off all the enemies she's made, she can't support and defend herself without outside help, and sugar-daddy Uncle Sam has exhausted all of his assets schlepping for her. He's broke.

The Zionist regime's fate is inevitable. How the Israelis choose to meet this fate is up to them.
 
2012-09-17 05:29:16 PM

theknuckler_33: Hobodeluxe: Mother Jones might have just performed the Coup de grâce on the Romney campaign.

I'm not sure I agree with that assessment, but the idea that Romney thinks the 47 (or whatever) percent that pay no (federal) income tax all support Obama is about as laughable a concept as anything I can imagine.


And I doubt he actually believes that, but it's what the blurred out millionaires sitting in front of him writing checks want to hear.
 
2012-09-17 05:29:32 PM

badaboom: Lionel Mandrake: badaboom: No one except the administration but I guess that does not count

A deadly assault on a U.S. consulate in Libya was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim video, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Sunday, even as Libya's president insisted the attackers spent months preparing and carefully choosing their date - the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Well, I disagree, and everyone I know does, too. I don't think that position will stand.

I'll still take it over a macho-man, tough-guy response

Not looking for a macho man response. Just looking for an honest one. In this case, the administration continues to fark the movie chicken. Having the story be Muslims still hate us even with Obama is not good for reelection campaign.


And only a libtard like 0bama would take an upcoming election - or foreign relations - into account, right?

And who the fark thinks the Muslims who hated us before stopped hating us when Obama was elected? (that's probably why Obama has killed so many of them)

There may be a few, but I would contend they're too rare and too stupid to be of much concern/
 
2012-09-17 05:30:47 PM

Amos Quito: badaboom: Helen had some ideas

Glad we are getting down to your racist core beliefs.


Glad you're being reduced to name-calling.

Look, the state that was birthed by the racist Zionist scheme is doomed to bite the weenie.

Jews simply can't breed fast enough to fight off all the enemies she's made, she can't support and defend herself without outside help, and sugar-daddy Uncle Sam has exhausted all of his assets schlepping for her. He's broke.

The Zionist regime's fate is inevitable. How the Israelis choose to meet this fate is up to them.


And what would you like to see that fate be?
 
2012-09-17 05:31:27 PM

Hobodeluxe: Mother Jones might have just performed the Coup de grâce on the Romney campaign.


Nahhhh. "Democrats are bums" is a pretty standard Republican thing. Ain't gonna shock anyone. "I'd have a better chance if I was half Mexican" will only bother liberals. Its probably worth about half a point in the polls. Suprised the camera guy even bothered to leak it.

Though, it did say there was more to come at the bottom. Could easily be a proper hammerblow in there somewhere.
 
2012-09-17 05:33:48 PM

cmb53208: You want a red line Bibi? There's a Red Line in Chicago, it runs from Howard Avenue south to 95th Street. There's your farking red line asshole.


Right now I am picturing Netanyahu at the 95th Street station on a Friday night, all by his lonesome. Pretty soon, he would be on the Brown Line...... leaking from his pants.
 
2012-09-17 05:36:04 PM

Amos Quito: indylaw: Suede head: [anendtoempire.files.wordpress.com image 728x421]

Go ahead and draw your red line, Israel. What you telling us about it for?

I'm gonna need a citation for that Ariel Sharon quote.


I can't comment on the accuracy of the above, but here's another Sharon quote that - in hindsight - validates the point:


Sharon says U.S. should also disarm Iran, Libya and Syria

Haaretz - Feb.18, 2003

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq. "These are irresponsible states, which must be disarmed of weapons mass destruction, and a successful American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve," Sharon said to a visiting delegation of American congressmen.

Sharon told the congressmen that Israel was not involved in the war with Iraq "but the American action is of vital importance."

In a meeting with U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton yesterday, Sharon said that Israel was concerned about the security threat posed by Iran, and stressed that it was important to deal with Iran even while American attention was focused on Iraq.

Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials that he had no doubt America would attack Iraq, and that it would be necessary thereafter to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea.

END QUOTE

Remember, this was 2003

Libya? Gone
Syria? Waving goodbye
Iran? Who's next?

When Izzy goes tizzy, Uncle Sam gets busy!


/North Korea? WTF?


Libya and Syria had actual revolutions though. Granted, if one of those topples the Iranian regime with the sort of limited assistance we provided in Libya, you won't see me bat an eyelash. Or are you of the opinion that our Psyops is indeed that good?
 
2012-09-17 05:38:02 PM

Hobodeluxe: Mother Jones might have just performed the Coup de grâce on the Romney campaign.


Wow.
 
2012-09-17 05:40:51 PM

badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: Helen had some ideas

Glad we are getting down to your racist core beliefs.


Glad you're being reduced to name-calling.

Look, the state that was birthed by the racist Zionist scheme is doomed to bite the weenie.

Jews simply can't breed fast enough to fight off all the enemies she's made, she can't support and defend herself without outside help, and sugar-daddy Uncle Sam has exhausted all of his assets schlepping for her. He's broke.

The Zionist regime's fate is inevitable. How the Israelis choose to meet this fate is up to them.

And what would you like to see that fate be?


To meerly hope that it falls apart or is taken apart with as little screaming and burning as possible.
 
2012-09-17 05:43:01 PM

Hobodeluxe: Mother Jones might have just performed the Coup de grâce on the Romney campaign.


RUH-ROH!
 
2012-09-17 05:44:53 PM

Holocaust Agnostic: badaboom: Amos Quito: badaboom: Helen had some ideas

Glad we are getting down to your racist core beliefs.


Glad you're being reduced to name-calling.

Look, the state that was birthed by the racist Zionist scheme is doomed to bite the weenie.

Jews simply can't breed fast enough to fight off all the enemies she's made, she can't support and defend herself without outside help, and sugar-daddy Uncle Sam has exhausted all of his assets schlepping for her. He's broke.

The Zionist regime's fate is inevitable. How the Israelis choose to meet this fate is up to them.

And what would you like to see that fate be?

To meerly hope that it falls apart or is taken apart with as little screaming and burning as possible.


How do you think anyone who is Jewish would do under the new management?
 
2012-09-17 05:48:30 PM
The question is if the US shall continue pumping $30B or so per annum into a country that obviously cannot sustain itself. The Israel idea was a bad one, and even worse is that it's leaders are unwilling and unable to seek a solution that would be sustainable. Instead it uses blackmailing...
That or Israel has to end.
 
Displayed 50 of 304 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report