Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Sydney Morning Herald)   William and Kate, with boobies covered, greeted by women and young girls, with boobies uncovered, in Solomon Islands tour. Boobies   (news.smh.com.au) divider line 26
    More: Amusing, Solomon Islands, British Royal Family, God Save the Queen  
•       •       •

21975 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Sep 2012 at 9:45 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-09-17 08:38:26 AM  
5 votes:
This article is worthless without pics.
2012-09-17 09:48:02 AM  
3 votes:
t0.gstatic.com
"william and kate, with boobies covered!"
2012-09-17 10:44:16 AM  
2 votes:
3.bp.blogspot.com
"William and Kate, with boobs covered"

media.noob.us
"I've seen everything."

i.ytimg.com
"They're flajacks. Computer! Holographic projection of Picard Spank Bank entry Stardate 9-14-2012."

www.bob937.com
*computery sounds*

i.imgur.com
"Bear, with paws extended. Dog, with plate of broccoli." 
2012-09-17 10:09:26 AM  
2 votes:
"It's up to people around the world to regulate themselves with common sense and decency,"

One of the greatest phrases of wisdom i have ever heard and all ya'll care about is boobs. lol.

farm7.staticflickr.com
2012-09-17 09:51:54 AM  
2 votes:
You guys that desperate for little girl boobies? Dude, did I accidentally load up 4chan by mistake?
2012-09-17 09:40:03 AM  
2 votes:
I know its way early in the thread but:

i758.photobucket.com
2012-09-17 02:48:19 PM  
1 votes:
But srsly, what's with all the Kate hate?

i216.photobucket.com 

That's a nice lookin' woman.
2012-09-17 02:25:54 PM  
1 votes:

Crotchrocket Slim: muck4doo: Carth: Silly Jesus:

Reductio ad absurdum

Also, just so you don't misuse the term again reductio ad absurdum is a technique used to highlight fallacious points in another person's argument, not a fallacy in itself. (unless you meant to imply you were wrong but i don't think you did)

If you meant to imply that my reasoning wasn't a logical progression from your statements the fallacy you should have referred to was a strawman.

Stop trolling. This thread is about tits.

[www.zgeek.com image 536x768]

Anyone know who this fine specimen of womanhood is BTW? I know she's a staple in boobies threads...


her name is boobies. Okay, hold on, her name is Anna Song, and i am discovering she has videos on the net. :)
2012-09-17 01:21:51 PM  
1 votes:

Carth: Silly Jesus:

Reductio ad absurdum

Also, just so you don't misuse the term again reductio ad absurdum is a technique used to highlight fallacious points in another person's argument, not a fallacy in itself. (unless you meant to imply you were wrong but i don't think you did)

If you meant to imply that my reasoning wasn't a logical progression from your statements the fallacy you should have referred to was a strawman.


Stop trolling. This thread is about tits.

www.zgeek.com
2012-09-17 12:50:54 PM  
1 votes:

cryinoutloud: Silly Jesus: It comes down to should there be a law that says that if you're on a public road you can't look in a certain direction if certain special people happen to be outside. That's nuts. They have great benefit from being who they are, and that benefit comes with a downside. They have to take the good with the bad. It's not as though the photographers were peeking in their windows (trespassing on their property). They were visible from a public road. I can't go stand out in my yard and get pissed if someone takes a picture of me.

Why do you guys make me comb the Daily Fail to find ways to support my position? it's just mean. Here's where the pictures were taken from:

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x460]

I'm aware of where they were taken. I've seen that photograph before. It just further proves my point. They were in public (visible from a public road).


Would you be OK with someone taking pictures of you from that distance?

Yes. Do you suggest we set up some arbitrary distance beyond which the public must avert their eyes? Say, if someone is 500 yards away it'd be illegal for you to look in that direction or take a picture?


Another question: If some nice woman asked you "Please don't take pictures of me" (as she surely would have, if asked), would you take the pictures anyway, then sell them? If you say yes, then I guess we know what kind of person you are, and no amount of arguing will change you.

Probably not. It depends on the situation.

1) Starving family and I need the money and she's out in public and the brain dead public will pay big money to see pictures of someone who loves being in the spotlight? Sure, I'll take them and sell them.

2) Out hiking and I see a random person and for some strange reason feel the need to photograph her...and she asks me to stop. Then I'd stop.

But personally I think you just like to troll.

Yeah, that's not the first time I've heard that. That's the term generally ascribed to anyone with a different opinion. I'm a self imposed outcast from the Fark echo chamber...what can I say.

2012-09-17 11:06:47 AM  
1 votes:

cryinoutloud: Silly Jesus: This just highlights the silliness of the whole Kate boobies situation. They are farking casually hanging out with a bunch of topless women and nobody is dying or suing one another. They are just boobs people. Half the world has them. Get the fark over it.

I gather (because I read gossip, sue me) that it was Prince William who had a shiat-fit about the pictures, and wanted to sue. Remember who his mother was. I have to say that I can't really blame him. He wants to protect his wife.


Protect her from what?

I understand his feelings due to what happened to his mother...but if it wasn't just about the boobies, then he'd throw a shiat fit every time the paparazzi took pictures...and he doesn't, from what I can tell.

Laws against people with cameras actually actively CHASING you, fine. Laws against people with camera aided super-duper eyesight seeing you standing around outside...boobs out or not....yeah, no law for that.
2012-09-17 10:47:50 AM  
1 votes:

Parthenogenetic:
"Bear, with paws extended. Dog, with plate of broccoli."




You are my hero.
2012-09-17 10:41:35 AM  
1 votes:

jfivealive: Pretty sure that the titties we'd see would be national geographic type boobies


When growing up that's the boobie we had access to and we liked it. Now get off my lawn.
2012-09-17 10:34:45 AM  
1 votes:
Kate should just give the paparazzi a collective "fark you" and pose in Playboy.
2012-09-17 10:34:25 AM  
1 votes:
i512.photobucket.com
2012-09-17 10:29:35 AM  
1 votes:

cryinoutloud: But when scandal hijacks a royal tour, it seems there's just no escaping it.

Especially when you bring it up in the very first sentence of your "news" story and wrap the whole story around it.

wambu: [i.imgur.com image 270x270]
If only Kate had some boobies worth viewing . . .

yeah. I wish I had boobs that hung down into my lap, even at a young age. That's my dream.


What a coincidence, young boobs in my lap is a dream of mine as well.

Stop hating on Yulia!

img.photobucket.com
2012-09-17 10:14:42 AM  
1 votes:

HotWingConspiracy: Kate has some flapjacks, that was a let down.


THIS
2012-09-17 10:09:30 AM  
1 votes:
But when scandal hijacks a royal tour, it seems there's just no escaping it.

Especially when you bring it up in the very first sentence of your "news" story and wrap the whole story around it.

wambu: [i.imgur.com image 270x270]
If only Kate had some boobies worth viewing . . .


yeah. I wish I had boobs that hung down into my lap, even at a young age. That's my dream.
2012-09-17 10:05:41 AM  
1 votes:
i.imgur.com

If only Kate had some boobies worth viewing . . .
2012-09-17 09:57:34 AM  
1 votes:

Silly Jesus: This just highlights the silliness of the whole Kate boobies situation. They are farking casually hanging out with a bunch of topless women and nobody is dying or suing one another. They are just boobs people. Half the world has them. Get the fark over it.


I think all the people in the world have boobs. Some are just bigger, rounder, and softer than others.

/I have boobs, could you milk me?
2012-09-17 09:55:43 AM  
1 votes:
ITT: boys who desperately need to grow the fark up.

We all biatch about government invading our privacy, but it's OK for asshole photographers to do it?
2012-09-17 09:53:24 AM  
1 votes:
Kate has some flapjacks, that was a let down.
2012-09-17 09:53:21 AM  
1 votes:
This just highlights the silliness of the whole Kate boobies situation. They are farking casually hanging out with a bunch of topless women and nobody is dying or suing one another. They are just boobs people. Half the world has them. Get the fark over it.
2012-09-17 09:50:02 AM  
1 votes:
Pretty sure that the titties we'd see would be national geographic type boobies
2012-09-17 09:46:56 AM  
1 votes:

Krymson Tyde: This article is worthless without pics.


//needs to be said as many times as possible
2012-09-17 09:44:26 AM  
1 votes:

Krymson Tyde: This article is worthless without pics.

 
Displayed 26 of 26 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report