If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Lawyers seek injunction over Kate Middleton topless photos, apparently unclear on how the internet works   (foxnews.com) divider line 175
    More: Interesting, Kate Middleton, civil cases, La Repubblica, Joe Webb, injunctions, St. James  
•       •       •

7492 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Sep 2012 at 5:57 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



175 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-16 04:27:53 PM  
how hard is it for famous people to get: don't whip out your titties if you don't want to see them on the internets

no number of lawsuits can put your top back on
 
2012-09-16 04:32:27 PM  
Honey, if you don't want pictures of your titties taken don't go out on a balcony topless. The pictures were taken from a public road, not from some guy "invading your privacy". How much privacy can you expect standing outside with your titties flapping in the breeze?
 
2012-09-16 04:32:44 PM  
Where are these pictures?
I'd rather fancy a glimpse at the royal orbs.
 
2012-09-16 04:43:24 PM  
The US and England could go to war over this.
Pity. For them.
 
2012-09-16 04:45:54 PM  

Walker: Honey, if you don't want pictures of your titties taken don't go out on a balcony topless. The pictures were taken from a public road, not from some guy "invading your privacy". How much privacy can you expect standing outside with your titties flapping in the breeze?

Not quite big enough to be flapping.
 
2012-09-16 04:46:20 PM  
The palace will seek damages from the publisher, which is owned by former Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi.

I find this hilarious.

TommyymmoT: Where are these pictures?
I'd rather fancy a glimpse at the royal orbs.


It's called the Internet
 
2012-09-16 04:54:34 PM  
The lawyers know all about the internet, but they also know all about 'billable hours'
 
2012-09-16 05:01:07 PM  

bojon: Walker: Honey, if you don't want pictures of your titties taken don't go out on a balcony topless. The pictures were taken from a public road, not from some guy "invading your privacy". How much privacy can you expect standing outside with your titties flapping in the breeze?
Not quite big enough to be flapping.


You know what I mean.
 
2012-09-16 05:03:19 PM  
I fapped in the breeze once.

/wait...what?
 
2012-09-16 05:11:11 PM  
More like flapjacks, AMIRITE!??
 
2012-09-16 05:17:43 PM  

xiaodown: More like flapjacks, AMIRITE!??


I'd pour syrup on those flapjacks.

/sorry Brits, no disrespect intended
//but your princess is hot....
 
2012-09-16 05:22:48 PM  

ArkAngel: The palace will seek damages from the publisher, which is owned by former Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi.

I find this hilarious.

TommyymmoT: Where are these pictures?
I'd rather fancy a glimpse at the royal orbs.

It's called the Internet


I just did a quick GIS. I'll look into it more some other time. I'm busy right now.
 
2012-09-16 05:33:31 PM  

whidbey: The US and England could go to war over this.
Pity. For them.


Wasn't it a French magazine/newspaper that first broke the images?

Also I'm having trouble finding the identity of the paparazzi that was after Princess Diana when she died, but it was in France so I'm going to go out on a limb and assume it was French paparazzi.

I don't think it's the US the British should go to war with over this sort of thing.
 
2012-09-16 05:55:13 PM  
So, will British partisans burn down the French Embassy in retribution?
 
2012-09-16 05:57:42 PM  

pecosdave: whidbey: The US and England could go to war over this.
Pity. For them.

Wasn't it a French magazine/newspaper that first broke the images?

Also I'm having trouble finding the identity of the paparazzi that was after Princess Diana when she died, but it was in France so I'm going to go out on a limb and assume it was French paparazzi.

I don't think it's the US the British should go to war with over this sort of thing.


The Sun, The Daily Mirror, and News of the World.

Link
 
2012-09-16 06:02:06 PM  
What hypocritical oafs. Brits have placed CCTV cameras on every corner to monitor the public, and they shiat themselves when someone invades the Royal family's privacy in a FOREIGN COUNTRY. Sorry, assholes, but your privilege only goes so far.
 
paj
2012-09-16 06:03:33 PM  
Why is having topless pictures of yourself a huge deal? Oooo, she removed a strip of fabric! Prudes.
 
2012-09-16 06:04:10 PM  
 
2012-09-16 06:04:33 PM  

scathing1: What hypocritical oafs. Brits have placed CCTV cameras on every corner to monitor the public, and they shiat themselves when someone invades the Royal family's privacy in a FOREIGN COUNTRY. Sorry, assholes, but your privilege only goes so far.


Quoted for brilliance.

Also, they weren't that spectacular. The pics or the boobs, at that. Blurry distance shot that could really be anyone.
 
2012-09-16 06:06:12 PM  

basemetal: xiaodown: More like flapjacks, AMIRITE!??

I'd pour syrup on those flapjacks.

/sorry Brits, no disrespect intended
//but your princess is hot....


She is a rather good looking woman. I'm sure her breasts are nice, but we'll never know from the pictures taken at that distance.
 
2012-09-16 06:06:13 PM  

Demetrius: I fapped in the breeze once.

/wait...what?


It's so nice out... I think I'll leave it out.
 
2012-09-16 06:06:55 PM  
They would get a lot more mileage and a lot less notoriety over it if they would act as if it were no big deal and to admonish the press with "please stop doing this kind of stuff. Really? Guys... it isn't kindergarten anymore. Grow up. Sometimes people are naked. Deal with it."
 
2012-09-16 06:07:09 PM  

omeganuepsilon: Also, they weren't that spectacular.


You expected Roman candles?
 
2012-09-16 06:08:13 PM  
I think Id rather see nude pics of Pippa Middletons royal arse
 
2012-09-16 06:08:38 PM  
Meh. Half the world's population have them.
 
2012-09-16 06:09:55 PM  

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: basemetal: xiaodown: More like flapjacks, AMIRITE!??

I'd pour syrup on those flapjacks.

/sorry Brits, no disrespect intended
//but your princess is hot....

She is a rather good looking woman. I'm sure her breasts are nice, but we'll never know from the pictures taken at that distance.


Clean your contact lenses.

Kate has nothing to be ashamed of.
 
2012-09-16 06:10:15 PM  

Walker: Honey, if you don't want pictures of your titties taken don't go out on a balcony topless. The pictures were taken from a public road, not from some guy "invading your privacy". How much privacy can you expect standing outside with your titties flapping in the breeze?


It was a public road half a mile away, and France also has pretty strict privacy laws, although it sounds like the fines aren't enough to prevent a magazine from publishing these photos anyway.
 
2012-09-16 06:10:55 PM  

whidbey: The US and England could go to war over this.
Pity. For them.


I'm going to get a chocolate frappé and join the flash dance crowd at the embassy.
 
2012-09-16 06:12:13 PM  

ArkAngel: The palace will seek damages from the publisher, which is owned by former Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi.

I find this hilarious.

TommyymmoT: Where are these pictures?
I'd rather fancy a glimpse at the royal orbs.

It's called the Internet


0_0

Bwahhahahahaahah!
 
2012-09-16 06:14:01 PM  

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: basemetal: xiaodown: More like flapjacks, AMIRITE!??

I'd pour syrup on those flapjacks.

/sorry Brits, no disrespect intended
//but your princess is hot....

She is a rather good looking woman. I'm sure her breasts are nice, but we'll never know from the pictures taken at that distance.


That's so very true.
 
2012-09-16 06:15:17 PM  

ArkAngel: The Sun, The Daily Mirror, and News of the World.


So
www.notashamed.org.uk, elliottneep.files.wordpress.com, and upload.wikimedia.org 

Never thought a rock band would have gotten involved.
 
2012-09-16 06:15:22 PM  

Strobeguy: I think Id rather see nude pics of Pippa Middletons royal arse


The royal buttocks are not on display to the general public, and especially not to the commoners.
 
2012-09-16 06:15:45 PM  
imageshack.us


Nice ass, though.
 
2012-09-16 06:16:13 PM  
Oh look, boobs, never seen those before.

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaawn
 
2012-09-16 06:16:14 PM  

Strobeguy: I think Id rather see nude pics of Pippa Middletons royal arse


More so than Harry's harry bum.
 
2012-09-16 06:16:29 PM  
Don't fap into the wind. Or tug on Superman's cape.
 
2012-09-16 06:18:26 PM  
So the world's most infamous family of welfare cheaters are going to learn first-hand about the Streisand Effect. Wah-farking-wah.
 
2012-09-16 06:18:32 PM  
They know they're not getting these pics off the tubes.

It's about preventing future pictures. Make the paparazzi and especially the publishers think twice about doing something similar again.
 
2012-09-16 06:21:57 PM  

Strobeguy: I think Id rather see nude pics of Pippa Middletons royal arse


THIS
 
2012-09-16 06:22:02 PM  

12349876: They know they're not getting these pics off the tubes.

It's about preventing future pictures. Make the paparazzi and especially the publishers think twice about doing something similar again.


The only thing that would make paparazzi think twice is if we started summary drawing and quartering of anyone caught within 10,000 yards of a celebrity with any type of recording device.

Even then I doubt there'd be much success.
 
2012-09-16 06:22:27 PM  

ElLoco: They would get a lot more mileage and a lot less notoriety over it if they would act as if it were no big deal and to admonish the press with "please stop doing this kind of stuff. Really? Guys... it isn't kindergarten anymore. Grow up. Sometimes people are naked. Deal with it."


Most likely, it would then be edited and relooped with 'deal with it' memes and 'people are naked.' all over the internet - youtards giggling like schoolgilrls over such insipid content. Eventually, you'll get that neuter whiteknighting it to epic levels, crying that you should 'leave them alone!'
 
2012-09-16 06:23:17 PM  

black_knight: So the world's most infamous family of welfare cheaters


The True Cost of the Royal Family


/Summary - The UK actually makes £160 million in profit from the Windsors
 
2012-09-16 06:25:06 PM  

scathing1: What hypocritical oafs. Brits have placed CCTV cameras on every corner to monitor the public, and they shiat themselves when someone invades the Royal family's privacy in a FOREIGN COUNTRY. Sorry, assholes, but your privilege only goes so far.


Sigh. There are not "cameras on every corner" in the UK. And most of the ones that are there are owned by the public, not the state.
 
2012-09-16 06:30:44 PM  

black_knight: So the world's most infamous family of welfare cheaters are going to learn first-hand about the Streisand Effect. Wah-farking-wah.


They're paid as diplomats and representative of the English government in an advertorial sense.

/ In addition, they're the cornerstone of British heritage. Without the royal family, Britain simply loses a major part of their identity especially in comparison to the other European countries.
 
2012-09-16 06:31:47 PM  

Snapper Carr: black_knight: So the world's most infamous family of welfare cheaters

The True Cost of the Royal Family


/Summary - The UK actually makes £160 million in profit from the Windsors


Bull. The royals are also supposed to pay for various parts of te civil government. If the Civil List act wasn't agreed to by the next monarch, that monarch would be bankrupt almost instantly. The deal gives to elected government more power in exchange for paying for things the royals are supposed to pay for and paying royals a salary.
 
2012-09-16 06:35:52 PM  

scathing1: What hypocritical oafs. Brits have placed CCTV cameras on every corner to monitor the public, and they shiat themselves when someone invades the Royal family's privacy in a FOREIGN COUNTRY. Sorry, assholes, but your privilege only goes so far.

 
2012-09-16 06:40:22 PM  

OtherLittleGuy: So, will British partisans burn down the French Embassy in retribution?


And the German embassy and maybe a Cinnabon for good measure.
 
2012-09-16 06:40:44 PM  

scathing1: One place to view said pictures.


Another place to view said pictures
(my blog. I'm shameless click whore, click an ad or buy something from Amazon while you're there and I might arrange for someone to give you a handy - no gender or attractiveness guarantees)
 
2012-09-16 06:43:08 PM  

wrs1864: Snapper Carr: black_knight: So the world's most infamous family of welfare cheaters

The True Cost of the Royal Family


/Summary - The UK actually makes £160 million in profit from the Windsors

Bull. The royals are also supposed to pay for various parts of te civil government. If the Civil List act wasn't agreed to by the next monarch, that monarch would be bankrupt almost instantly. The deal gives to elected government more power in exchange for paying for things the royals are supposed to pay for and paying royals a salary.


Well, they could take their shiat and go home.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2012-09-16 06:44:29 PM  
Print, not internet, is what I understand the injunction to be targeting.

According to BBC coverage today, this will likely end up with the publisher making an apology and paying the couple. Nobody will go to jail. So basically she'll get paid for posing topless but come across as a victim rather than a woman of questionable morals.
 
Displayed 50 of 175 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report