The 2009 reboot was great and Deep Space Nine was barely a step up from Voyager, Garza.

It seems to be mostly a list of the most depressing moments in Star Trek history.

CavalierEternal: The 2009 reboot was great and Deep Space Nine was barely a step up from Voyager, Garza.

To quote Emo Phillips:
"Die Heretic!"

Shostie: Listen, I know you grew up with DS9, but TNG is superior.

It is known.

Number of Troi episodes in DS9: 1
Number of Troi episodes in TNG: more than 1

Shostie: Are you counting Lwaxana guest appearances?

Crap, she showed up on DS9 a couple more times than that, huh?

Tell Me How My Blog Tastes: Deanna... faptapulous.

Touché

Shostie: Listen, I know you grew up with DS9, but TNG is superior.

It is known.

I grew up with TNG, but after finally watching DS9 about 4-5 years ago, I have to day that you're dead wrong.

TNG will always hold one of the highest places in my heart, but DS9 is some damn amazing sci-fi, and good Trek of the highest order.

Shostie: Listen, I know you grew up with DS9, but TNG is superior.

It is known.

I grew up with TNG, and DS9 (which I never watched until 2-3 years ago) is superior. The first two seasons of DS9 may be dull, but the first two seasons of TNG are terrible. And DS9 just gets better and better as the seasons go on, while TNG sort of ran out of steam near the end.

cman: Its farking ON asshole

DS9 was the greatest Trek ever.

Voyager sucked, yes; and Enterprise was even worse. But, DS9, that was the saving grace of the franchise.

gopher321: CavalierEternal: The 2009 reboot was great .



Two words: red matter.

/facepalm

Red matter is no less retarded than Heisenberg Compensators.

scottydoesntknow: "Waaaaah Abrams actually made Star Trek somewhat accessible to non-trekkies into a dumbed-down franchise that fans disliked because it turned the characters into caricatures of themselves, had a ridiculous premise and made no farking sense! This is a travesty of the highest order!"

FTFY. You're welcome.

secularsage: scottydoesntknow: "Waaaaah Abrams actually made Star Trek somewhat accessible to non-trekkies into a dumbed-down franchise that fans disliked because it turned the characters into caricatures of themselves, had a ridiculous premise and made no farking sense! This is a travesty of the highest order!"

FTFY. You're welcome.

Aww, I'm sorry the new movie was good.

"1. Edith Keeler Sums Up Kirk And Spock In City On The Edge Of Forever"

And Harlan Ellison once again is sent into an apoplectic rage.]


also its TOS>DS9>TNG>VOY>ENT

I can't believe they left off the list the scene where Darth Vader reveals he is Kirk's father.

Star Trek is good drama, but poor sci-fi. All the different series are pretty well equally silly, but they make for good entertainment.

The only reason people try to act like the original star trek series has any special merit over the newest series and movies is just because of nostalgia. NTTAWTT

Also, Abram's Star Trek had the best action sequences out of any of the movies, that is undeniable.

GAT_00: Red matter is no less retarded than Heisenberg Compensators.


Or dilithium crystals.

I understand that in science fiction sometimes science has to take a backseat to storytelling, but the main problem I had with the new Trek movie is that I just couldn't connect with any of the characters. Kirk was a dickhead, Spock was a prick, Uhura was a biatch, and Scotty was a buffoon. Sulu, Mckoy and Chekov were okay, but just sort of "there". I honestly didn't care what happened to any of them. Kirk's path from cadet to captain was way too easy, at that--among other things--made it really hard for me to root for him.

Honestly, the whole movie felt more like bad fan fiction than legitimate Star Trek. That's the problem I had with it. I don't even mind the alternate universe. In fact, I think that's the best aspect of the new movies. They can tell new stories accessible to wider audiences without destroying established canon.

/I just didn't like any of the characters
//Like the prequel trilogy versus the original Star Wars trilogy

Best ten moments in Star Trek history without Deep Space Nine? FAIL.

DS9 is the best, and yet, always forgotten by everyone outside of some of us here on Fark. They always mention Voyager and Enterprise, but never DS9. Odd.

The new movie wasn't bad at all. I liked it. I didn't like how much of a douche they made Kirk. But I also didn't expect him to be a Shatner clone. However, this new Kirk was more hanging-off-cliffs yet still getting lucky than actually-being-damn-good at anything like Shatner's Kirk, who was the God Damn Batman of Star Trek. But maybe Pine's Kirk will be a little more seasoned (or whatever) this time around.

/DS9 wasn't Berman trek. That would be Voyager.
//DS9 was Micheal Piller and... Damn, some other guys I forget right now. But Berman and Braga created it. They just ditched it for Voyager and that's when DS9 got good.

NNNNNNEEEERRRRDDDDSSSSS!!!!!!