If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gothamist)   Teenager wins $14.5 million from the company that made the baseball bat that hit the ball that struck him, spilling his hot coffee onto very expensive pants, hit the pole and dropped the net onto his plastic mice   (gothamist.com) divider line 105
    More: Asinine, Sports Authority, Louisville Slugger, a hit, hockey sticks, daily life, Little League, time trials  
•       •       •

3445 clicks; posted to Sports » on 11 Sep 2012 at 4:10 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



105 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-09-11 01:33:05 PM
Anything that helps get these cheater bats out of youth sports is fine by me.
 
2012-09-11 01:44:37 PM
*rtfa*

What's his FARK handle?
 
2012-09-11 02:10:55 PM
I've never liked the metal bats, feeling that they cheapen the game.

I've listened to both sides (wood and metal) defend their bats and heard about how well the metal bat does and why it does it, but when all the BS stops, the game was created around a wooden bat and wood has greater benefits than metal.

Besides, I prefer to hear the KRAK of a solid wooden bat connecting with the ball than that stupid ping!

I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones. That'd start a riot.

Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?

Then again, they do it for toothpicks.

Plus there is the feel of a good, wooden bat in one's hands that absolutely can't be copied by metal.
 
2012-09-11 02:12:34 PM
That's farked up. I don't even have any snark. I doubt the $145-million is any consolation.

...well, that is a lot of money.
 
2012-09-11 02:14:27 PM

Rik01: Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?


Some bats are made from maple and ash.
 
2012-09-11 02:20:28 PM

Mugato: That's farked up. I don't even have any snark. I doubt the $145-million is any consolation.

...well, that is a lot of money.


$14 point 5 million. You're off by an order of magnitude.

Still, that's a very expensive Mouse Trap.
 
2012-09-11 02:25:34 PM

xanadian: *rtfa*

What's his FARK handle?


Dunno, but he's over in the politics tab for sure.
Farking dumbasses in this world.
If anyone was liable to keep him breathing for 15 - 20 minutes, it would be Mr CPR trained coach.
But since he spends his time volunteering, he has no money in his pockets.
Better to go after the Ball manufact...oh? The don't have money/
Then the Bat people. SUE THE BAT PEOPLE!.
Kid should have been wearing chest protection and his parents didn't make him wear it.
I hope the Bat people beat his parents right out of the courtroom and make them feel like bad parents, because they are and they should feel bad.
Also, I give my self a pre-emptive 8/10 on this.
But I'm also dead serious.
 
2012-09-11 02:37:21 PM

King Something: $14 point 5 million. You're off by an order of magnitude.


I just copied and pasted from the title. I don't like to typ
 
2012-09-11 02:44:46 PM

vudukungfu: If anyone was liable to keep him breathing for 15 - 20 minutes, it would be Mr CPR trained coach.


I agree with ya' here.
Really??? NOBODY watching the game knew CPR.
Hell even before I got trained I got my son breathing once when he was 3, while my CPR "trained" stupid ex-wife was screaming at the 911 operator.
I just did what I'd seen on tv a million times, hell somebody at least try.
 
2012-09-11 02:55:52 PM

old_toole: I just did what I'd seen on tv a million times, hell somebody at least try.


You delivered hammer fists to his chest while screaming "BREATHE, DAMN YOU!!!"?

/Reason metal bats are still used at the amateur level: wooden bats break.
 
2012-09-11 02:59:52 PM
And people scoff at limitations of liability
 
2012-09-11 03:09:21 PM

Harv72b: You delivered hammer fists to his chest while screaming "BREATHE, DAMN YOU!!!"?


OK that made me laugh.
Wasn't quite what I was thinking but HAHAHAHA
 
2012-09-11 03:13:44 PM
And people wonder why we move manufacturing over seas.
 
2012-09-11 03:46:39 PM

vudukungfu: But I'm also dead serious.


No, I feel you. Uh. Not *FEEL* you, but feel you. This country is too damn litigious.
 
2012-09-11 03:50:14 PM

Rik01: I've never liked the metal bats gloves or catchers' pads or machine-created baseballs or finely curated fields or not chewing tobacco all game or the idea that the game could be played as a career or pitchers not pitching every other day for every pitch, feeling that they cheapen the game.


FTFY
 
2012-09-11 03:56:03 PM

Rik01: I've never liked the metal bats, feeling that they cheapen the game.

I've listened to both sides (wood and metal) defend their bats and heard about how well the metal bat does and why it does it, but when all the BS stops, the game was created around a wooden bat and wood has greater benefits than metal.

Besides, I prefer to hear the KRAK of a solid wooden bat connecting with the ball than that stupid ping!

I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones.



Yeah, but it's only because they can't pronounce that word.
 
2012-09-11 04:05:05 PM
The little league team decided to allow its use, knowing the ratings ahead of time. The parents allowed the kid to play baseball, knowing they used metal bats.

So why do they get to use the manufacturer of the bat, instead of ONLY the little league management? Oh right, because the little league wouldn't have $14.5 million to spare.
 
2012-09-11 04:16:48 PM
I'm sure his parents would much rather have a normal kid than any amount of money.
 
2012-09-11 04:17:17 PM
So ... by this judgement's logic, we can sue gun manufacturers for guns killing people?
 
2012-09-11 04:17:33 PM

Harv72b: old_toole: I just did what I'd seen on tv a million times, hell somebody at least try.

You delivered hammer fists to his chest while screaming "BREATHE, DAMN YOU!!!"?

/Reason metal bats are still used at the amateur level: wooden bats break.


Think I saw two, maybe three bats break in my little league career. The reason metal bats are used is because the ball carries farther. Hate 'em.

/*crack* beats *ping* every day
 
2012-09-11 04:19:39 PM
If the bats were super dangerouns this kind of think would happen more often. This sounds more like an event that happened out of millions of events, meaning it was more bad luck and likely slow reflexes than ot was a dangerous bat.

I'm so tired of people ignoring risks of every day life and then sueing someone when one of those risks bites them in the ass.

Yes, I feel badly for the kid, but there is no one to blame here except God, if you believe in him. I mean, he does control everything, right?
 
2012-09-11 04:20:05 PM
Learn to read everyone. It's a settlement, not a judgment.
 
2012-09-11 04:20:28 PM
While this is a tragic accident that happened to the kid, it's part of the game. You are the pitcher. You are in direct line with the path of a baseball if hit. Was it illegal to use a metal bat at that time (the article didn't say)? If so, then it's the league's fault, not the bat manufacturer's fault - I'm surprised that the gun manufacturers aren't balking at this ruling.
 
2012-09-11 04:21:00 PM
so if this kid got hit with a ball from a wood bat, none of this would have happened right?, cause clearly that ball would have been going slower by at least 30 -40 mph, this ruling is a crock of shait
 
2012-09-11 04:21:11 PM
Subby. I like your headline.

that is all
 
2012-09-11 04:25:30 PM

Rik01: I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones. That'd start a riot..


It was tried precisely once by those cheating convicts the Aussies, it nearly did start a riot, and it was promptly banned.

/There's nothing like the sound of leather on willow
 
2012-09-11 04:30:34 PM

PsyLord: While this is a tragic accident that happened to the kid, it's part of the game. You are the pitcher. You are in direct line with the path of a baseball if hit. Was it illegal to use a metal bat at that time (the article didn't say)? If so, then it's the league's fault, not the bat manufacturer's fault - I'm surprised that the gun manufacturers aren't balking at this ruling.


Thing is, it has nothing to do with the bat (or very little). It's a condition that has happened in other sports (lacrosse for example), where a couple kids have died after getting hit in the chest at just the right spot at just the right time.

Rather than change the bats or blame the bats, they should look into making the pitchers, maybe all the infielders, wear a chest protector under their uniforms. It doesn't have to be anything big or bulky.
 
2012-09-11 04:34:40 PM
Metal bat cartel?
 
2012-09-11 04:35:46 PM

Wall_of_Doodoo: Metal bat cartel?


Forget it, he's rolling.
 
2012-09-11 04:39:39 PM
Has Brandon McCarthy filed his lawsuit yet?

Baseball, while safer than some sports can still be dangerous...With or without aluminum bats or PED enhanced ball players.
 
2012-09-11 04:43:49 PM

drewsclues: Learn to read everyone. It's a settlement, not a judgment.


Had to go back and look.

Unf*ckingbelievable.

We're done.
 
2012-09-11 04:46:11 PM
I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.
 
2012-09-11 04:47:40 PM

Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.


He got hit in the chest
 
2012-09-11 04:49:14 PM

Rik01: Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?


Wooden bats are historically made from ash wood. Maple is in fashion now but the better bats are from ash. Maple bats tend to shatter when they break, due to the cellular structure.
 
2012-09-11 04:49:29 PM

The Gordie Howe Hat Trick: I'm sure his parents would much rather have a normal kid than any amount of money.


So, because my son's kneecap was fractured playing soccer, I should file suit against the maker of the shoe worn by the other player? Sucks for the kid and the parents but I fail to see how the bat manufacturer is at fault.

drewsclues: Learn to read everyone. It's a settlement, not a judgment.


Thanks, missed that. How does "awarded a $xxx settlement" work; does this mean the judge approved a settlement between plaintiff and defendant?
 
2012-09-11 04:50:25 PM

The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest


Exactly.
 
2012-09-11 04:51:01 PM

Foxxinnia: The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest

Exactly.


I like it. Are you licensed to practice in Federal court?;)
 
2012-09-11 04:53:43 PM
This injury occured from one of those composite bats that are now forbidden in Little League play.

"Little League said injuries to its pitchers fell from 145 a year before the accord was reached to the current level of about 20 to 30 annually."

When your product causes around a 700% increase in injuries to your customers --right or wrong, you are going to get sued.

Anyone seen Klick Klacks or Lawn Darts around lately?
 
2012-09-11 04:56:44 PM
Careful, subby. People around here get very angry if you suggest the McDonald's coffee lawsuit was a frivolous one.
 
2012-09-11 04:58:51 PM

Odd Bird: The Gordie Howe Hat Trick: I'm sure his parents would much rather have a normal kid than any amount of money.

So, because my son's kneecap was fractured playing soccer, I should file suit against the maker of the shoe worn by the other player? Sucks for the kid and the parents but I fail to see how the bat manufacturer is at fault.

drewsclues: Learn to read everyone. It's a settlement, not a judgment.

Thanks, missed that. How does "awarded a $xxx settlement" work; does this mean the judge approved a settlement between plaintiff and defendant?


Instead of going to a jury trial and being in the hands of 12 peers (that I'm assuming could have awarded them even more), the defendant offered a settlement that the plaintiff agreed on and the case was dropped.
 
2012-09-11 05:01:56 PM

The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest


The helmet was supposed to dive into the path of the ball dumbass.
 
2012-09-11 05:02:16 PM

mjones73: Instead of going to a jury trial and being in the hands of 12 peers (that I'm assuming could have awarded them even more), the defendant offered a settlement that the plaintiff agreed on and the case was dropped.


Yep. If you have deep pockets you are almost certainly better off settling than you are letting a jury of your "peers" decide if you owe and how much.
 
2012-09-11 05:02:54 PM
If we lived in a country with socialized health care, this type of lawsuit would not happen. The parents would not be left with a lawsuit as their only option to fund the lifetime of care that this kid needs.

It's amazing to me that the same people that want to limit lawsuit award size ("tort reform") are some of the same people that are against healthcare reform.
 
2012-09-11 05:03:02 PM
Just wondering why the parents didn't include suing all those present at the game, the batter, the park they played the game in, oh, and the pitcher...

Wait, he WAS the pitcher! So in essence he was responsible for the incident the entire time. Hopefully they'll appeal. I feel bad for the kid but that's life and you don't get rewarded for accidents. Plus, isn't there a mandatory insurance policy in place?
 
2012-09-11 05:07:28 PM

srhp29: Has Brandon McCarthy filed his lawsuit yet?


img528.imageshack.us

He's got other things on his mind, apparently.
 
2012-09-11 05:08:06 PM

Harv72b: /Reason metal bats are still used at the amateur level: wooden bats break.


That's one reason, but it, along with the rest of the "reasons" are all poor excuses for putting children at risk.

lunchinlewis: Rather than change the bats or blame the bats, they should look into making the pitchers, maybe all the infielders, wear a chest protector under their uniforms. It doesn't have to be anything big or bulky.


Good point, but metal bats are unnecessarily dangerous.

Odd Bird: So, because my son's kneecap was fractured playing soccer, I should file suit against the maker of the shoe worn by the other player? Sucks for the kid and the parents but I fail to see how the bat manufacturer is at fault.


They make a product that endangers the users. Why shouldn't they be liable? You might as well give a four year old a bag of glass to play with and advise them to "be careful with that."

Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels. Not because it's tradition, or because it's easier for a kid to hit a homer with it and keep them interested in the game, or because of the feel of a wooden bat, or because it prepares them for the pros, but because balls come off a metal bat at absurdly high velocity, often directly toward players who are untrained to defend themselves against it.
 
2012-09-11 05:08:14 PM

Rik01: I've never liked the metal bats, feeling that they cheapen the game.

I've listened to both sides (wood and metal) defend their bats and heard about how well the metal bat does and why it does it, but when all the BS stops, the game was created around a wooden bat and wood has greater benefits than metal.

Besides, I prefer to hear the KRAK of a solid wooden bat connecting with the ball than that stupid ping!

I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones. That'd start a riot.

Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?

Then again, they do it for toothpicks.

Plus there is the feel of a good, wooden bat in one's hands that absolutely can't be copied by metal.


All of that bullshiat aside, metal bats don't increase the speed of the ball off of the bat all that much compared to woodenb bats. Metal bats offer a few benefits, however. They are lighter. Most...and I mean most...kids are not strong enough to swing a wooden bat and be able to keep up with pitching. Second, metal bats offer a larger sweet spot, which increases the chances of hitting the ball well. Having played for decades and played with both metal and wooden bats, I never really saw a difference when the ball hits the sweet spot. However, wooden bats also have a few drawbacks other than being too heavy for kids. They break. I almost speared a third baseman with a broke bat once. I also did nail a catcher with a broken barrell once. He was ok, but walked funny for the rest of the game. Fact is, there are risks with being an athlete and this is one of them. I'm sorry the kid got screwed up from a liner, but he could have just easily been killed by a line drive off of a wooden bat.
 
2012-09-11 05:09:32 PM

The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest

Exactly.

I like it. Are you licensed to practice in Federal court?;)


Federal, international maritime, Islamic, b-ball, I got what you need.
 
2012-09-11 05:11:06 PM

MyPenIsHuge: Wait, he WAS the pitcher! So in essence he was responsible for the incident the entire time. Hopefully they'll appeal.


No, blame his coach for not taking him out of the game when his curve ball started floating up over the middle of the plate.
 
2012-09-11 05:11:08 PM
They should be blaming the doctors that brought him back after being without oxygen for 15-20 minutes. His death would have been due to an accident, bringing him back after not breathing for so long has pretty obvious consequences that anyone with medical training would have known about.
 
2012-09-11 05:11:41 PM
The one thing that has strangely not been debated in this wood/metal debate is the price. Over the long run, the metal ones are cheaper because of their durability.
 
2012-09-11 05:12:01 PM
 
2012-09-11 05:12:13 PM

The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest


So?
 
2012-09-11 05:13:53 PM

Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.


I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.
 
2012-09-11 05:14:03 PM

mjones73:
Instead of going to a jury trial and being in the hands of 12 peers (that I'm assuming could have awarded them even more), the defendant offered a settlement that the plaintiff agreed on and the case was dropped.


The use of "awarded" threw me off, "settlement reached" is more like it. Thanks for taking the time.
 
2012-09-11 05:14:35 PM

Babwa Wawa: That's one reason, but it, along with the rest of the "reasons" are all poor excuses for putting children at risk.


Maybe they shouldn't play the sport at all...Add football to that list, because no matter what you do those kids are being put at risk when playing baseball and football, amongst other sports.
 
2012-09-11 05:14:53 PM

The Viewer: This injury occured from one of those composite bats that are now forbidden in Little League play.

"Little League said injuries to its pitchers fell from 145 a year before the accord was reached to the current level of about 20 to 30 annually."

When your product causes around a 700% increase in injuries to your customers --right or wrong, you are going to get sued.

Anyone seen Klick Klacks or Lawn Darts around lately?


No and that sucks. fark you and all the idiots out there who have no personal responsibility what so ever.

biatch.
 
2012-09-11 05:15:30 PM

Babwa Wawa: They make a product that endangers the users.


The user was injured? You might want to rethink that comment. Are they beating themselves over the head with the bats?
 
2012-09-11 05:17:18 PM
That lives in the house. Where Jack Lives.
 
2012-09-11 05:18:31 PM

Rik01: I've never liked the metal bats, feeling that they cheapen the game.

I've listened to both sides (wood and metal) defend their bats and heard about how well the metal bat does and why it does it, but when all the BS stops, the game was created around a wooden bat and wood has greater benefits than metal.

Besides, I prefer to hear the KRAK of a solid wooden bat connecting with the ball than that stupid ping!

I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones. That'd start a riot.


Not a riot old chap, just a disapproving glance. Then if the bounder still kept on with the silly idea we will send him off to a psychologist as using something other than willow shows a clear mental imbalance.
 
2012-09-11 05:18:50 PM

The Muthaship: Foxxinnia: I'm surprised they didn't also sue the helmet manufacturers who failed to produced a helmet that would adequately protect his tender cranium without him having to wear it.

He got hit in the chest


Not the bat's problem. If it was the bats, we'd have seen cases like this before and since.

This kid had the incredible misfortune to be hit with the legendary dim mak due to some truly unfortunate timing. Lamentable, but it's almost sickening that the family was able to bring a lawsuit against the bat manufacturer of all people. The coach, the family of the kid who hit the pitch, the first person to try and save him, almost anyone else makes more sense.

They might as well have sued Monsanto who probably had a hand in the chemicals on the turf which contributed to the solidity of the terrain which allowed their boy to be standing at the right elevation to be injured.
 
2012-09-11 05:22:07 PM

Foxxinnia: Federal, international maritime, Islamic, b-ball, I got what you need.


In that case, you may like my highly relevant anecdote:

When I was in law school, we had a softball tournament. My team had some big hitters on it (I was not one of them), and this was the one year that a titanium softball bat was approved for use. Of course, the jugheads on my team had one. The team we were playing complained, but we used it anyway. One of our players hit a line drive to the 3rd basemen. It hit him in his non-glove hand, and broke a bone in it.

Their team walked off the field saying the bat was dangerous. As they walked by, one of the guys on our team said to their 3rd baseman, "You should sue for loss of consortium."
 
2012-09-11 05:23:11 PM

doglover: Not the bat's problem. If it was the bats, we'd have seen cases like this before and since.


I don't know what made you think I disagree with any of what you said, but I don't.
 
2012-09-11 05:28:38 PM

Babwa Wawa:
They make a product that endangers the users. Why shouldn't they be liable? You might as well give a four year old a bag of glass to play with and advise them to "be careful with that."


I was going to respond with similes and counter points, but decided your post was either a troll or 10lb bag of derp.
 
2012-09-11 05:32:20 PM

lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.


Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.
 
2012-09-11 05:40:38 PM

Babwa Wawa: lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.

Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.


He would have the best chance of avoiding a baseball if he were not on the field at all.

By they way, the idea is to catch the ball in baseball, not avoid it.
 
2012-09-11 05:44:39 PM

Odd Bird: Babwa Wawa:
They make a product that endangers the users. Why shouldn't they be liable? You might as well give a four year old a bag of glass to play with and advise them to "be careful with that."

I was going to respond with similes and counter points, but decided your post was either a troll or 10lb bag of derp.


What's trolly about saying that you should use wooden bats? And that those people who know the risks associated with aluminum bats and still provide them should be held liable?
 
2012-09-11 05:45:43 PM
Did noone perform CPR? Did they just wait 15 minutes for the EMT to show up?
 
2012-09-11 05:45:59 PM

srhp29: Babwa Wawa: lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.

Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.

He would have the best chance of avoiding a baseball if he were not on the field at all.

By they way, the idea is to catch the ball in baseball, not avoid it.


You f*cking idiot. How many MLB pitchers don't defend themselves against line drives?
 
2012-09-11 05:47:49 PM

Babwa Wawa: How many MLB pitchers don't defend themselves against line drives?


There's one in the hospital right now that may or may not live. When will MLB outlaw wooden bats?
 
2012-09-11 05:54:39 PM

srhp29: Babwa Wawa: lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.

Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.

He would have the best chance of avoiding a baseball if he were not on the field at all.

By they way, the idea is to catch the ball in baseball, not avoid it.


And I suppose you believe that kids should either play with aluminum bats, or nothing at all, right.

And when I'm teaching my son to drive, he should learn on the bugatti, or not learn at all.

Nice strawman.
 
2012-09-11 06:34:17 PM

Rik01: I've never liked the metal bats, feeling that they cheapen the game.

I've listened to both sides (wood and metal) defend their bats and heard about how well the metal bat does and why it does it, but when all the BS stops, the game was created around a wooden bat and wood has greater benefits than metal.

Besides, I prefer to hear the KRAK of a solid wooden bat connecting with the ball than that stupid ping!

I don't think you'd find the Brits trading in their wooden bats for their traditional game of Cricket to use aluminum ones. That'd start a riot.

Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?

Then again, they do it for toothpicks.

Plus there is the feel of a good, wooden bat in one's hands that absolutely can't be copied by metal.


Yup we tried aluminium cricket bats back in the 1970s and they were promptly banned. Nothing beats the sound and feeling of willow on leather.
 
2012-09-11 06:35:54 PM

CatfoodSpork: If we lived in a country with socialized health care, this type of lawsuit would not happen. The parents would not be left with a lawsuit as their only option to fund the lifetime of care that this kid needs.

It's amazing to me that the same people that want to limit lawsuit award size ("tort reform") are some of the same people that are against healthcare reform.


UHC will make people stop being greedy latigious shiatstains? Wow! What can't it do?
 
2012-09-11 06:42:47 PM
*litigious
 
2012-09-11 06:58:20 PM
If this is the same guy I'm thinking of: The family's lawsuit originally demanded that the company (I believe Louisville Slugger) no longer manufacture metal bats. However when they waved the money under the noses of the family, suddenly they decided they didn't give a shiat about metal bats anymore. How is the bat at fault? Why not sure the maker of the glove for being too heavy for the son to catch the ball in time? Would this lawsuit still have been filed if it was a wooden bat? (I'm guessing yes). This family started off as out to protect the children, but ended up giving that up in place of a big payday. fark them and their piece of shiat lawyer.
 
2012-09-11 07:10:17 PM
Whoa whoa whoa, I think the real problem is the baseballs. Wiffle balls don't cause that kind of damage, no matter what you hit 'em with. That's the real criminal in this case.
 
2012-09-11 07:22:36 PM
Given a lifetime of care needed, the settlement seems about the right size given the insanely expensive health system in the US. You can see that the parents pretty much would have no choice but to try and find someone to sue, and probably the company thought it was cheaper/better to settle than to have the case rattle on for years, and probably decades of journalists revisiting the family and their financial and personal struggles if they won the case, and keep associating their company with this unfortunate incident over and over.
 
2012-09-11 07:39:03 PM

Babwa Wawa: srhp29: Babwa Wawa: lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.

Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.

He would have the best chance of avoiding a baseball if he were not on the field at all.

By they way, the idea is to catch the ball in baseball, not avoid it.

And I suppose you believe that kids should either play with aluminum bats, or nothing at all, right.

And when I'm teaching my son to drive, he should learn on the bugatti, or not learn at all.

Nice strawman.


My point was, had he had more time at a ball hit at his chest, he probably would have tried to catch it, not avoid it. A ball at ones head is easier to get out of the way of than a ball at ones chest, if "trying to avoid". You can't jump a ball at your chest and there is a lot more room you have to "duck" to get out of the way too.

All I am saying is there is no proof that had the batter been using a wooden bat and hit the ball at a slightly slower speed, that this would not have happened. The problem was where and when it hit, not necessarily how hard it hit. If it hit him in the middle of the chest, how much slower would it have to be going to avoid it all together? I'm thinking failry significantly...More than the difference between a medal and wooden bat.
 
2012-09-11 07:41:34 PM

Babwa Wawa: srhp29: Babwa Wawa: lunchinlewis: Babwa Wawa: Baseball should be played with wooden bats - at all levels.

I'm no doctor, but from what I've read about this type of injury to the heart/chest, it seems likely that it could happen with a wooden bat too.

Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.

He would have the best chance of avoiding a baseball if he were not on the field at all.

By they way, the idea is to catch the ball in baseball, not avoid it.

You f*cking idiot. How many MLB pitchers don't defend themselves against line drives?


Defend themselves, or avoid? You could define catching a ball as "defending" yourself against it.

I wonder if this kids follow through put him in an optimum fielding position. Maybe poor coaching is as much to blame, but let's be honest...Coaches don't have 14.5M laying around in most cases so what is the point in going after them.
 
2012-09-11 07:44:01 PM

The Muthaship: Babwa Wawa: How many MLB pitchers don't defend themselves against line drives?

There's one in the hospital right now that may or may not live. When will MLB outlaw wooden bats?


You mean Brandon McCarthy? Because according to his tweet (that someone posted an image of earlier in the thread) he's been discharged already. I think we can say he's out of the woods on this particular injury, at least in terms of the threat to his life.

/ his sense of humor appears to be intact as well
 
2012-09-11 07:58:41 PM
I liked mouse trap.
 
2012-09-11 08:03:49 PM
When Little League teams moved from wood to aluminum bats, the number of injuries went down. They don't shatter, they don't splinter and you hit the ball back at the pitcher only slightly harder.
 
2012-09-11 08:03:58 PM

srhp29: All I am saying is there is no proof that had the batter been using a wooden bat and hit the ball at a slightly slower speed, that this would not have happened. The problem was where and when it hit, not necessarily how hard it hit. If it hit him in the middle of the chest, how much slower would it have to be going to avoid it all together? I'm thinking failry significantly...More than the difference between a medal and wooden bat.


And my point is that aluminum bats are both unnecessary and a hazard. I played with both as a kid - hitting a dinger with a wood bat is hella more satisfying, I can tell you.

The hazard is well known enough that regulations have changed in college. Why would they allow the things in youth ball?
 
2012-09-11 08:10:15 PM
Clearly the obvious message is we need to replace the pitcher with a tee ball stand,
and use a wiffle ball bat,
and a Nerf ball.
And bubble wrap our snowflakes.
And TAKE OUR FARKING LUMPS LIKE AMERICANS.


Nation of pussies.
That's all I can say.


Farking farkwads farking suing everything that moves farking soaking in it.
SOAKING IN IT!
 
2012-09-11 08:33:44 PM

The Muthaship: Their team walked off the field saying the bat was dangerous. As they walked by, one of the guys on our team said to their 3rd baseman, "You should sue for loss of consortium."


i'm not a lawyer, but even I found that funny.

/BOOO-URNS!
 
2012-09-11 09:31:52 PM
Something similar happened to a kid at my school during a little league game. He was playing 3rd base and took a line drive to the head. It put him in a coma for a while and he has been farked up ever since. Parents didn't sue, it may not have occurred to them. I'm sure the statute of limitations has well expired as this happened over 20 years ago.

/not a csb
 
2012-09-11 09:33:37 PM
so someone develop a chest protector for these little f**kers, ok then one of them gets hit in the eye with a ball and is blind. full pads.
 
2012-09-11 09:48:45 PM
City Councilman James Oddo: I hope that karma comes around and catches everyone in metal bat cartel who traded in lies and deceit all in search of the mighty dollar, while all too willing to put kids at an elevated risk.

Really, James? I didn't know baseball bat manufacturers were on the same level as cigarette companies but I guess they are.

I still have the mag bat that my father got me in the mid-70s. Never in all the years I played youth baseball did I see an serious accident involving a line drive. I did see one of my friends break his leg sliding into 3rd base with brand new steel cleats. Perhaps his family should have sued the cleat manufacturer. It was obviously an evil company looking for profits at any cost.
 
2012-09-11 10:32:56 PM

lunchinlewis: Rather than change the bats or blame the bats, they should look into making the pitchers, maybe all the infielders, wear a chest protector under their uniforms. It doesn't have to be anything big or bulky


Except that chest protectors wouldn't have prevented this unless you went with the hard shelled professional level umpire chest protectors. Those are too unwieldy for players to wear.
 
2012-09-11 11:08:54 PM
The fact that this lawsuit wasn't thrown out of court immediately after the judge read the filing shows how broken the system is.
 
2012-09-11 11:35:04 PM

lunchinlewis: PsyLord: While this is a tragic accident that happened to the kid, it's part of the game. You are the pitcher. You are in direct line with the path of a baseball if hit. Was it illegal to use a metal bat at that time (the article didn't say)? If so, then it's the league's fault, not the bat manufacturer's fault - I'm surprised that the gun manufacturers aren't balking at this ruling.

Thing is, it has nothing to do with the bat (or very little). It's a condition that has happened in other sports (lacrosse for example), where a couple kids have died after getting hit in the chest at just the right spot at just the right time.

Rather than change the bats or blame the bats, they should look into making the pitchers, maybe all the infielders, wear a chest protector under their uniforms. It doesn't have to be anything big or bulky.


They already make something.

i.imgur.com
 
2012-09-11 11:40:25 PM

Babwa Wawa: Possibly true, but a kid would have a better chance of avoiding the ball if it weren't traveling as fast. The kid wasn't exactly picking dandelions when he got hit.


You do realize that any difference in reaction time between a ball hit by a wooden bat & one hit by an aluminum bat would be measured in milliseconds at that distance?

It's not like it struck him a glancing blow to the temple; it hit him square in the chest. Barring some sort of Matrix-like ability he was going to get hit regardless.
 
2012-09-11 11:47:57 PM
Just thought I'd point out that this should prove to be excellent precedent for people to sue gun companies because their gun delivered the projectile that killed or maimed their loved ones.

/Enjoy
 
2012-09-11 11:54:12 PM
Is there no insurance policy in the world that would have taken care of the boy/man/senior citizen's expenses for life, WITHOUT having to get lawyers and companies involved?
This family might not have had such a policy, but surely this would qualify as a freakish type event that some kind of family/health insurance was specially "invented" to cover.

/not a lawyer
//not a doctor
///not an insurance person
 
2012-09-12 12:06:16 AM
www.philzone.org

Approves.
 
2012-09-12 12:43:57 AM

Huck And Molly Ziegler: Is there no insurance policy in the world that would have taken care of the boy/man/senior citizen's expenses for life, WITHOUT having to get lawyers and companies involved?
This family might not have had such a policy, but surely this would qualify as a freakish type event that some kind of family/health insurance was specially "invented" to cover.

/not a lawyer
//not a doctor
///not an insurance person


It's the miracle of "Products Liability" and when $14.5MM is on the line nobody's insurer wants any piece of paying it.
 
2012-09-12 01:23:58 AM
The articles on this were severely lacking in details, but I wonder if the parents went after LS because they misrepresented the performance of the bat. For the last 15-20 years or so, most leagues that use metal bats require that they be under a certain Bat Performance Rating (BPF for short). One of the problems is that for a long time, the manufacturer did the testing. It wasn't until fairly recently that independent labs did any testing. More than a few bats were found to have a higher bpf than what the manufacturer was reporting.

For those of us that played ball in the 80s and early 90s and used metal bats, modern bats are way the hell better than what we used. I have a bat that is probably 20-25 years old that is deader than wood. A newer metal bat would never have that problem.
 
2012-09-12 02:17:38 AM

vudukungfu: If anyone was liable to keep him breathing for 15 - 20 minutes, it would be Mr CPR trained coach.


If you're doing CPR for 15-20 minutes you're lucky to end up with a vegetable. Without a defib unit or cardiac drugs the patient is done after that lone. CPR alone is just to stretch out the chance you have. Without the victim falling through a frozen river/lake/creek/pond/etc, 15-20 minutes is way too long.
 
2012-09-12 04:23:11 AM

CraicBaby: Rik01: Of course, now you get to consider the ecological problem. The best bats are made from Oak. Oak trees are slow growing and much in demand for wood. Is it right to strip a forest for a game?

Some bats are made from maple and ash.


Don't these things come from tree farms anyway?
 
2012-09-12 06:44:11 AM
How do I know that most of you have any knowledge about bats...
 
2012-09-12 08:29:00 AM

badscooter: lunchinlewis: PsyLord: While this is a tragic accident that happened to the kid, it's part of the game. You are the pitcher. You are in direct line with the path of a baseball if hit. Was it illegal to use a metal bat at that time (the article didn't say)? If so, then it's the league's fault, not the bat manufacturer's fault - I'm surprised that the gun manufacturers aren't balking at this ruling.

Thing is, it has nothing to do with the bat (or very little). It's a condition that has happened in other sports (lacrosse for example), where a couple kids have died after getting hit in the chest at just the right spot at just the right time.

Rather than change the bats or blame the bats, they should look into making the pitchers, maybe all the infielders, wear a chest protector under their uniforms. It doesn't have to be anything big or bulky.

They already make something.

[i.imgur.com image 240x180]


pfft, well there you go. My work here is done.
 
2012-09-12 11:47:06 AM

The Gordie Howe Hat Trick: I'm sure his parents would much rather have a normal kid than any amount of money.


Sure. But that doesn't justify this terrible outcome. Parents should sue themselves for letting their snowflake play a sport.
 
2012-09-12 01:07:25 PM

ladodger34: The articles on this were severely lacking in details, but I wonder if the parents went after LS because they misrepresented the performance of the bat. For the last 15-20 years or so, most leagues that use metal bats require that they be under a certain Bat Performance Rating (BPF for short). One of the problems is that for a long time, the manufacturer did the testing. It wasn't until fairly recently that independent labs did any testing. More than a few bats were found to have a higher bpf than what the manufacturer was reporting.

For those of us that played ball in the 80s and early 90s and used metal bats, modern bats are way the hell better than what we used. I have a bat that is probably 20-25 years old that is deader than wood. A newer metal bat would never have that problem.


Most likely it was a composite bat, as they have largely replaced aluminum ones over the past few years. The issue with them is that they improve (in other words, the ball comes off faster) as they are broken in (the material has more give, increasing the trampoline effect). So a bat with a BPF of 1.2 out of the wrapper could conceivably become a 1.3 (making up numbers) midway throught the season. Aluminum bats, on the other hand, do not improve with age, and will actually degrade as the aluminum distorts.

As was mentioned, the biggest issue was not so much the bat, as where and when the kid was hit. 1/100th of a second sooner or later and he would have only ended up with a bruise.
 
2012-09-12 05:34:16 PM

Manute Bol: ladodger34: The articles on this were severely lacking in details, but I wonder if the parents went after LS because they misrepresented the performance of the bat. For the last 15-20 years or so, most leagues that use metal bats require that they be under a certain Bat Performance Rating (BPF for short). One of the problems is that for a long time, the manufacturer did the testing. It wasn't until fairly recently that independent labs did any testing. More than a few bats were found to have a higher bpf than what the manufacturer was reporting.

For those of us that played ball in the 80s and early 90s and used metal bats, modern bats are way the hell better than what we used. I have a bat that is probably 20-25 years old that is deader than wood. A newer metal bat would never have that problem.

Most likely it was a composite bat, as they have largely replaced aluminum ones over the past few years. The issue with them is that they improve (in other words, the ball comes off faster) as they are broken in (the material has more give, increasing the trampoline effect). So a bat with a BPF of 1.2 out of the wrapper could conceivably become a 1.3 (making up numbers) midway throught the season. Aluminum bats, on the other hand, do not improve with age, and will actually degrade as the aluminum distorts.

As was mentioned, the biggest issue was not so much the bat, as where and when the kid was hit. 1/100th of a second sooner or later and he would have only ended up with a bruise.


This right here... Most people don't know anything about bats today. You know letters like BPF and BBCOR and numbers like 1.20 BPF and 1.15 BPF and .50 BBCOR or what Advanced Break In testing (ABI) is and everyone gets lost.

All "little league" bats must comply with the new 1.15 BPF standard as set forth by LL International and USSSA (United States Speciality Sports Association). These bats are tested using ABI to assure they aren't going to get much if any past the standard's limits before breaking down. The bats are rolled to break them in before they are tested.

All bats used in middle school, high school, and college must conform to the even.stricter .50 BBCOR standard. BBCOR stands for Baseball Coefficient of Rebound. It states that the ball can not come off any faster than 50% of what it came in at... When held stationary.

The only sport still allowing the 1.20bpf standard is softball. USSSA,NSA, ISF for both slowpitch and fast pitch... WSL and GSL for slowpitch only. ASA has a 98 mph bat standard for all forms of softball. The main difference between associations in softball are the ball specs.
 
2012-09-13 10:09:13 AM

JSam21: Manute Bol: ladodger34: The articles on this were severely lacking in details, but I wonder if the parents went after LS because they misrepresented the performance of the bat. For the last 15-20 years or so, most leagues that use metal bats require that they be under a certain Bat Performance Rating (BPF for short). One of the problems is that for a long time, the manufacturer did the testing. It wasn't until fairly recently that independent labs did any testing. More than a few bats were found to have a higher bpf than what the manufacturer was reporting.

For those of us that played ball in the 80s and early 90s and used metal bats, modern bats are way the hell better than what we used. I have a bat that is probably 20-25 years old that is deader than wood. A newer metal bat would never have that problem.

Most likely it was a composite bat, as they have largely replaced aluminum ones over the past few years. The issue with them is that they improve (in other words, the ball comes off faster) as they are broken in (the material has more give, increasing the trampoline effect). So a bat with a BPF of 1.2 out of the wrapper could conceivably become a 1.3 (making up numbers) midway throught the season. Aluminum bats, on the other hand, do not improve with age, and will actually degrade as the aluminum distorts.

As was mentioned, the biggest issue was not so much the bat, as where and when the kid was hit. 1/100th of a second sooner or later and he would have only ended up with a bruise.

This right here... Most people don't know anything about bats today. You know letters like BPF and BBCOR and numbers like 1.20 BPF and 1.15 BPF and .50 BBCOR or what Advanced Break In testing (ABI) is and everyone gets lost.

All "little league" bats must comply with the new 1.15 BPF standard as set forth by LL International and USSSA (United States Speciality Sports Association). These bats are tested using ABI to assure they aren't going to get much if any past the standard's lim ...


That's another good point--nobody talks about the role that the compression rating of the ball plays. I've hit some that are so tight they come off the bat like a golf ball. Switch to a restricted flight-type ball and almost all of the benefits of composite bats are eliminated.

/side-note: I was fortunate enough to take BP in the Citizen's Bank hitting tunnel, and they had composite bats for us to use. The sound and feel of the bat was very much like wood.
 
Displayed 105 of 105 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report