LibertyHiller: qorkfiend: Gulper Eel: Mjeck: Thanks, but she's running her own campaignAnd doing such a bang-up job of it that she hired a campaign manager who robbed her blind. Nothing like blowing off doing your due diligence.qorkfiend: Surely you have evidence of this corruption.The -CA after her name should suffice, as it does for -NY, -NJ, -MA, -IL, -FL, -LA and -TX.So, no, you don't have any evidence of corruption.Actual corruption, probably not. But he has a point.DiFi swings a heavy stick in favor of the Central Valley industrial-agricultural complex when it comes to Federal water policy, without it being mentioned that her husband is heavily into agribusiness. It's more along the line of a conflict of interest that's pretty ordinary by most standards.
Low-levels leakers who disclose evidence of high-level wrongdoing are mercilessly punished by the Obama DOJ, while the high-level criminals they expose - and high-level leakers seeking to glorify the President - are aggressively shielded from all consequences. Meanwhile, leaks of classified information continue to be the prime currency for the same Washington media class that loves to heap scorn on people like Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. In sum, leaks of classified information are a heinous crime when done to embarrass or undermine those in power, but are noble and necessary when done to bolster them.Nobody embodies this species of blatant corruption more purely than the senior Democratic Senator from California and Intelligence Committee Chairwoman, Dianne Feinstein, who also serves as the National Security State's most faithful servant (a National Security State which, just by the way, has greatly enriched her extremely rich military contractor husband, Richard Blum
Gulper Eel: Mjeck: Thanks, but she's running her own campaignAnd doing such a bang-up job of it that she hired a campaign manager who robbed her blind. Nothing like blowing off doing your due diligence.qorkfiend: Surely you have evidence of this corruption.The -CA after her name should suffice, as it does for -NY, -NJ, -MA, -IL, -FL, -LA and -TX.
Mercutio74: She handled that poorly. She could have just said something like, "We couldn't agree to any acceptable terms for a debate so unless that changes, there won't be a debate."Then when he asks, "Shouldn't the voters hear what the candidates have to say?" or whatever... she could have responded with "I've been the Senator for my constituents for x-millionty years. They know who I am, and they know what I do for them in Warshington, and they know how I vote on issues. I believe I have a good relationship with the people in my state. If my opponent is having trouble getting their message across to the people, perhaps it's a message the people don't agree with."And that's with putting about 15 seconds of thought into it.
kingoomieiii: An ABC affiliate misrepresents the context of their own interview to create controversy for a Democrat leading in the polls? DAMN the liberal media, always in the tank for Obama's goons.
If you like these links, you'll love
Come on, it's $5 a month, just do it.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Nov 21 2017 01:56:12
Runtime: 0.286 sec (286 ms)