If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTKR)   Fark ready headline: 'Butt-smuggling' a direct result of government profiteering from tobacco   (wtkr.com) divider line 42
    More: Amusing, profiteers, smugglers, tobacco, street gangs, state governments  
•       •       •

6043 clicks; posted to Main » on 07 Sep 2012 at 11:06 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-09-07 01:25:23 PM
2 votes:

fireclown: david_gaithersburg: .
I finally gave up smoking when Obama raised the tax on RYO taboacco 4,300%. Basically his very first act in office was to give the poor a good swift kick to the balls, and he has been nonstop kicking ever since.


So, Fartbongo saved your life and you're MAD about it?

/Some people.


personally i think that's the wrong attitude...for your own good legislation is anti-freedom. leave that crap for the nannystates.
2012-09-07 12:00:13 PM
2 votes:

FarkinHostile: Pathman: yeah - just like all that underground alcohol we drink
bathtub wine - hell yeah


Say hello to my bathtub wine room.

img.photobucket.com


/take 2
2012-09-07 11:30:01 AM
2 votes:

orbister: And of course if marijuana were ever legalised, smuggling and other criminal involvement would instantly come to an end.


You price the taxes low enough and of course it would. Is there smuggling and criminal involvement with alcohol?
2012-09-07 04:45:20 PM
1 votes:
Butts cost me $1.25 or thereabouts a pack.
So, Fark You!
2012-09-07 04:26:33 PM
1 votes:

AllUpInYa: OgreMagi: AllUpInYa: Barnstormer: "And do you know who gets screwed the most? Poor people."

I've been saying that for years. Do-gooder knee-jerk extremists are ruining this country. Hope the anti-butt extremists are proud of themselves.

When those poor people come to the hospital for smoking-related illnesses, who's footing the bill?

How about that $5/pack tax? The one they said was required to pay for the (non-existent) higher health costs of smokers.

Thank you for explaining exactly why we need the tax!


Except the higher health care costs of smokers is a lie.
2012-09-07 04:21:50 PM
1 votes:
I think ill start buying cartons of smokes when I visit my folks in Delaware and sell them in NYC.
2012-09-07 04:14:00 PM
1 votes:

FarkinHostile: Pathman:

that right there is bad ass.
what's the story? that looks like a lab

I belong to a wine making organization; The South Side Social Club.We make about 600 gallons a year together, and I do another 30 or so gallons on my own, as do several of our members. Hell, I know no less than 20 people who make their own wine, and good/great quality wine to boot. I know more people who make wine then I do who grow pot. I also know a few people who have their own stills and make fantastic brandy and grappa. 170 proof is the minimum for Italian "moonshine".

I think you would be surprised at how popular a subculture wine making is.


I used to make and barrel my own wine when I lived in Napa; when in Rome...
2012-09-07 04:09:38 PM
1 votes:

AllUpInYa: Barnstormer: "And do you know who gets screwed the most? Poor people."

I've been saying that for years. Do-gooder knee-jerk extremists are ruining this country. Hope the anti-butt extremists are proud of themselves.

When those poor people come to the hospital for smoking-related illnesses, who's footing the bill?


How about that $5/pack tax? The one they said was required to pay for the (non-existent) higher health costs of smokers.
2012-09-07 03:55:34 PM
1 votes:

OgreMagi: Pathman: cleveoh: Please post the tiny violin pic for the "poor" smokers.

/ex smoker
//understands the joy addiction of smoking
///no sympathy

it's not about sympathy for smokers - it's about what government should have the power to do.
regulating behaviours like this shouldn't be one of them.

Regulate and tax tobacco because it's bad for you.
Regulate and tax sodas because they are bad for you.
Regulate and tax children't Happy Meals because they are bad for you. (nice try San Francisco).

The government thinks it has the DUTY to regulate behavior it deems inappropriate. Both sides of the aisle do it in their own way. The left goes after your health and how you affect the environment. The right goes after your relationships and sexual behavior. Both use the exact same arguments.

And with the government now neck deep into health care, it's going to get worse.


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
-C.S.Lewis
2012-09-07 03:40:29 PM
1 votes:

pute kisses like a man: / also, if you smoke, get coupons for the brand you like. that's the way to avoid high prices.


Yeah - every time I ever called the 800 number on a pack of cigarettes they sent me coupons. I suppose there's a limit, but I didn't call to get coupons - I usually called because I smoked a niche brand that was hard to find. If I still smoked I'd call every week and while smokers usually have a preferred brand there really isn't that big of a difference. In my early smoking days I used to buy whichever brand had the best promos. Oooh, a free lighter with 2 packs of Marlboros? I'll take those. Free t-shirt with the Camels? Okay.

Back around 1986 or so I don't think me or my roommate had to actually buy a single lighter. We had Marlboro lighters all over the place.

If you do still smoke and don't like the taste or hassle of refilling a Zippo go to Sam's Club and buy 50 Bic lighters. It's cheaper and it will take years for you to run out.
2012-09-07 03:12:20 PM
1 votes:

Pathman: cleveoh: Please post the tiny violin pic for the "poor" smokers.

/ex smoker
//understands the joy addiction of smoking
///no sympathy

it's not about sympathy for smokers - it's about what government should have the power to do.
regulating behaviours like this shouldn't be one of them.


Regulate and tax tobacco because it's bad for you.
Regulate and tax sodas because they are bad for you.
Regulate and tax children't Happy Meals because they are bad for you. (nice try San Francisco).

The government thinks it has the DUTY to regulate behavior it deems inappropriate. Both sides of the aisle do it in their own way. The left goes after your health and how you affect the environment. The right goes after your relationships and sexual behavior. Both use the exact same arguments.

And with the government now neck deep into health care, it's going to get worse.
2012-09-07 02:31:29 PM
1 votes:

FarkinHostile: Pathman:

that right there is bad ass.
what's the story? that looks like a lab

I belong to a wine making organization; The South Side Social Club.We make about 600 gallons a year together, and I do another 30 or so gallons on my own, as do several of our members. Hell, I know no less than 20 people who make their own wine, and good/great quality wine to boot. I know more people who make wine then I do who grow pot. I also know a few people who have their own stills and make fantastic brandy and grappa. 170 proof is the minimum for Italian "moonshine".

I think you would be surprised at how popular a subculture wine making is.


very cool. i wouldn't be that surprised seeing as how popular the home brew has gotten...
but that aside - i think the point stands - of all the alcohol purchases made in the US, what percentage do you think is done illegally? not even pointing out the fact that private wine making isn't even illegal...
2012-09-07 01:54:28 PM
1 votes:

LaughingRadish: I've been saying this when this trend started of jacking up tobacco taxes higher and higher. It just proves that politicians have very little understanding of basic economics.


Let's raise taxes on sin to make people stop sinning so much
Let's raise taxes on income to stop people from making too much income
They don't get the relationship. It's either a mental defect or willfull stupidity. I'm voting the latter
2012-09-07 01:52:08 PM
1 votes:

Pathman:

that right there is bad ass.
what's the story? that looks like a lab


I belong to a wine making organization; The South Side Social Club.We make about 600 gallons a year together, and I do another 30 or so gallons on my own, as do several of our members. Hell, I know no less than 20 people who make their own wine, and good/great quality wine to boot. I know more people who make wine then I do who grow pot. I also know a few people who have their own stills and make fantastic brandy and grappa. 170 proof is the minimum for Italian "moonshine".

I think you would be surprised at how popular a subculture wine making is.
2012-09-07 01:48:43 PM
1 votes:
When I was a smoker, the last pack I remember buying in NY state cost $2.52.
Moved away in 2000 and quit smoking.
Went back for vacation in June, pack of Cowboy lights costs $11.77 in Long Lake.
2012-09-07 01:37:49 PM
1 votes:
Strangely enough, the keep your laws off my body crowd probably has no problem telling others what they cannot do with theirs.
2012-09-07 01:21:35 PM
1 votes:
Known for smug buttling:

i47.tinypic.com
2012-09-07 01:18:55 PM
1 votes:

Evil Canadian: Wow, I guess this is not just a Canadian problem. We had a news article today about the same thing:


Same thing happens all over Europe. You cross the border from France into Luxembourg or Belgium into Luxembourg and there's loads of petrol stations (fuel is cheaper in Luxembourg than either) and when you pay, there's a little shop full of brands of cigarettes. Likewise, at Calais there's lots of shops selling booze for Brits coming over because the duty on alcohol in France is cheaper.
2012-09-07 01:16:06 PM
1 votes:
I've been saying this when this trend started of jacking up tobacco taxes higher and higher. It just proves that politicians have very little understanding of basic economics.
2012-09-07 01:15:53 PM
1 votes:

Happy Hours: Smokers should remember what happened when the 2008 tax increase was announced. Cigarette prices rose several months ahead of it going into effect and not only that, the price increased by more than the tax. Suddenly instead of paying $48 per carton I was paying $70 per carton.

Seriously, fark the tobacco companies. If you smoke, quit. I don't care about your health. I just want to see the tobacco companies die.

/madly puffs an e-cig


i used to work in a tobacco store, and it was comical how much every store would over inflate increased taxes. they basically used taxes as an excuse to jack prices.

whenever there was a tax increase, we only increased the price by the amount it cost us. so, basically, a tax increase meant we got more customers, because, respectively, our prices got cheaper.

/ also, if you smoke, get coupons for the brand you like. that's the way to avoid high prices.
// it's funny working in tobacco. people would come in and say they're quitting, and we would earnestly say that we will miss them as a customer, but best of luck, because your health is more valuable to us than your money. weird to wish for some of your best customers to stop buying your product.
2012-09-07 01:11:48 PM
1 votes:

fireclown: david_gaithersburg: .
I finally gave up smoking when Obama raised the tax on RYO taboacco 4,300%. Basically his very first act in office was to give the poor a good swift kick to the balls, and he has been nonstop kicking ever since.


So, Fartbongo saved your life and you're MAD about it?

/Some people.

.
.

Obviously you have never been educated on the concepts of regressive versus progressive taxation. The poor and middle class have been slammed with multiple regressive taxes in the past three years.

Heck, here in MD Dear Leader O'Malley just raised our Flush Tax by $60 p/month. What this means is that a person making $30k just got raped with a 2% tax on their annual income, but a person making $200k is only being hit up for a income tax hit of 0.30%. This is not just RAPE, its RAPE RAPE.

People like O'Bama and O'Malley aren't progressive, their just farking evil.
2012-09-07 01:03:49 PM
1 votes:
1. Google D&R Ryback
2. Purchase cheapest available
3. Wait for it to arrive in mail/load up on papers from ebay
4. Profit
2012-09-07 12:59:40 PM
1 votes:
Wow, I guess this is not just a Canadian problem. We had a news article today about the same thing:

FTFA:
Contraband cigarettes can be found in the homes of one in three smokers, said Bryans, whose organization represents 7,500 stores across Ontario.

The majority come in the form of 200 loose cigarettes sold in plastic bags and often originate from First Nations reserves, he said. Bryans said he has no issue with people driving to reserves to buy cigarettes.


I guess they've given up on the small personal use smugglers who make a rez run every couple of weeks and are after the bigger fishies now?
2012-09-07 12:27:38 PM
1 votes:

MoronLessOff: Buy loose and roll your own. An ounce of pipe smoke costs me maybe $3.50 or so and lasts forever. If I dried it a bit and rolled it I'd have more flavorful, better smelling and cheaper cigarettes.


.
.
I finally gave up smoking when Obama raised the tax on RYO taboacco 4,300%. Basically his very first act in office was to give the poor a good swift kick to the balls, and he has been nonstop kicking ever since.
2012-09-07 12:15:42 PM
1 votes:

Tom_Slick: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 640x460]

This has been happening in NYC for years

/Give me 2 Pall Malls


So help me if that's a shot from said movie I just posted!

/very tiny fists and what-not
2012-09-07 12:14:12 PM
1 votes:
4.bp.blogspot.com

This has been happening in NYC for years

/Give me 2 Pall Malls
2012-09-07 12:07:04 PM
1 votes:

the801: MoronLessOff: Buy loose and roll your own. An ounce of pipe smoke costs me maybe $3.50 or so and lasts forever. If I dried it a bit and rolled it I'd have more flavorful, better smelling and cheaper cigarettes.

pipe tobacco isn't really for inhaling. gross.

i used to buy a can of American Spirit and a box of 200 filtered tubes for under $20, and packed them with a cigarette machine and had good, cheap cigarettes. when the federal tax on packs of cigarettes went up to a dollar (i think), the tax on loose tobacco went up over 1000%. suddenly it was over $40 for a can of American Spirit.



Thanks for the insight. I don't smoke cigarettes. I didn't know loose cig smoke cost so much.
2012-09-07 11:52:51 AM
1 votes:

the801: also, mentally ill people are way more likely than others to be smokers. taxing smokes means taxing sick people for their medication, and the mentally ill are generally much less wealthy than other people.


that's very interesting. i didn't know that but it makes perfect sense. not surprising given the number of mentally ill that "self medicate" with one drug or another.

With a good as inelastic as tobacco, the tax burden is most definitely not shared equally between consumer and producer. This disparity is what makes behaviour-regulation like this so egregious.

It also stands in the way of the inevitable demise of the industry as again the producer shares a much lower burden of the tax.

It's a disgusting habit...regulating freedom.
Of course, so is smoking.
2012-09-07 11:52:21 AM
1 votes:
"And do you know who gets screwed the most? Poor people."

I've been saying that for years. Do-gooder knee-jerk extremists are ruining this country. Hope the anti-butt extremists are proud of themselves.
2012-09-07 11:51:15 AM
1 votes:

the801: also, mentally ill people are way more likely than others to be smokers. taxing smokes means taxing sick people for their medication, and the mentally ill are generally much less wealthy than other people.


Thanks for the citations that support your argument, but the menatally ill rarely vote, so they don't count much to politicians. So it doesn't matter unless one of the politicians has a mentally ill family member.
2012-09-07 11:48:54 AM
1 votes:

cleveoh: Please post the tiny violin pic for the "poor" smokers.

/ex smoker
//understands the joy addiction of smoking
///no sympathy


it's not about sympathy for smokers - it's about what government should have the power to do.
regulating behaviours like this shouldn't be one of them.
2012-09-07 11:48:52 AM
1 votes:
News Flash: You raise taxes and people find a way to get around them.
2012-09-07 11:47:54 AM
1 votes:

gopher321: Thank god that's a habit I never started. Bad enough to smoke, with all the carcinogens, but smoking just amplifies any other health issues you had unrelated to smoking and makes them worse. Tax the hell out of those fools who willingly poison their bodies I say!


/knocks back a scotch double


government should not be regulating victimless behaviour. it is not their role to make you a better healthier person.

/not a smoker
2012-09-07 11:46:19 AM
1 votes:

MFAWG: orbister: And of course if marijuana were ever legalised, smuggling and other criminal involvement would instantly come to an end.

You are absolutely correct. The black market in untaxed, cheaper weed will continue to thrive.


yeah - just like all that underground alcohol we drink
bathtub wine - hell yeah
2012-09-07 11:45:49 AM
1 votes:

MoronLessOff: Buy loose and roll your own. An ounce of pipe smoke costs me maybe $3.50 or so and lasts forever. If I dried it a bit and rolled it I'd have more flavorful, better smelling and cheaper cigarettes.


pipe tobacco isn't really for inhaling. gross.

i used to buy a can of American Spirit and a box of 200 filtered tubes for under $20, and packed them with a cigarette machine and had good, cheap cigarettes. when the federal tax on packs of cigarettes went up to a dollar (i think), the tax on loose tobacco went up over 1000%. suddenly it was over $40 for a can of American Spirit.

also, mentally ill people are way more likely than others to be smokers. taxing smokes means taxing sick people for their medication, and the mentally ill are generally much less wealthy than other people.

"Patients with mental illness have a higher incidence of smoking than the general population and are the major consumers of tobacco products. This population includes subjects with schizophrenia, manic depression, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), attention-deficit disorder (ADD), and several other less common diseases. Smoking cessation treatment in this group of patients is difficult, often leading to profound depression. Several recent findings suggest that increased smoking in the mentally ill may have an underlying biological etiology. The mental illness schizophrenia has been most thoroughly studied in this regard. Nicotine administration normalizes several sensory-processing deficits seen in this disease."
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305701006773

People living with mental illness have a very high rate of smoking. A study by The Journal of the American Medical Association reported that 44.3 percent of all cigarettes in America are consumed by individuals who live with mental illness and/or substance abuse disorders. This means that people living with mental illness are about twice as likely to smoke as other persons.
- NAMI
2012-09-07 11:34:15 AM
1 votes:
FTA: That's why it costs more than $11 bucks for a pack of smokes in Manhattan.

Eleven dollar bucks? That is expensive.
2012-09-07 11:24:21 AM
1 votes:
"Butt-Smugglers" sounds like a Brazzers DVD.

Preferably starring Sophie Dee.

i2.listal.com
2012-09-07 11:18:28 AM
1 votes:
Buy loose and roll your own. An ounce of pipe smoke costs me maybe $3.50 or so and lasts forever. If I dried it a bit and rolled it I'd have more flavorful, better smelling and cheaper cigarettes.
2012-09-07 11:15:15 AM
1 votes:
And of course if marijuana were ever legalised, smuggling and other criminal involvement would instantly come to an end.
2012-09-07 11:13:19 AM
1 votes:
Prohibition didn't work the first time around either.
2012-09-07 10:51:55 AM
1 votes:
Thank god that's a habit I never started. Bad enough to smoke, with all the carcinogens, but smoking just amplifies any other health issues you had unrelated to smoking and makes them worse. Tax the hell out of those fools who willingly poison their bodies I say!


/knocks back a scotch double
2012-09-07 09:53:18 AM
1 votes:
So the red man gives the white man the gift of tobacco.
Then the ..... oh, fark it.

You people can't even keep from farking up a simple little thing like enjoying being able to smoke what you could grow in your own back yard.
 
Displayed 42 of 42 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report