If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(North Jersey)   Today's teacher sex scandal brought to you by Essex County, New Jersey, where 33-year-old Teacher of the Year assaulted her 15-year-old male honor student for three horrible months. Oh yeah, he was honor   (northjersey.com) divider line 198
    More: Dumbass, Essex County, teacher of the year, montclair, New Jersey, Essex County Prosecutor's Office, Villanova University, sex scandals, English teacher  
•       •       •

29694 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Sep 2012 at 10:22 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



198 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-03 12:40:59 AM

Because People in power are Stupid: [i2.kym-cdn.com image 638x478]

MUST NOT FAP.


If that were true, I would be single-handedly responsible for the extinction of the species.
 
2012-09-03 12:44:40 AM

Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.


So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?
 
2012-09-03 12:45:59 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Is there really no one in her age group who can fark her like she wants to be farked?

What was going through her head?

Maybe it wasn't about age or sexuality but maybe they had things in common, you know, a real relationship?

What is wrong with you people?

What's scary is some people actually believe this.

You're right, it's much more elevated to make infantile jokes about rough and smooth balls than to see a man for who he is regardless of his age.

Go back and read this thread. A fifteen-year-old could easily be a more mature partner than half of you farkers.


img267.imageshack.us

Exactly who are you farking who is underage? You sure have the rationalization down pat. You friends with Jerry?

img155.imageshack.us
 
2012-09-03 12:46:10 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.


No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.
 
2012-09-03 12:46:57 AM

Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?


Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.
 
2012-09-03 12:49:49 AM
http://westorange.patch.com/articles/high-school-female-teacher-arrest ed-for-sex-with-student


More info here. A lot of kids that had her in class chimed in. Evidently she's very inappropriate with the students by going to parties and hanging out with them outside of class.
 
2012-09-03 12:50:40 AM
Now with linky goodness
 
2012-09-03 12:50:41 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Is there really no one in her age group who can fark her like she wants to be farked?

What was going through her head?

Maybe it wasn't about age or sexuality but maybe they had things in common, you know, a real relationship?

What is wrong with you people?

What's scary is some people actually believe this.

You're right, it's much more elevated to make infantile jokes about rough and smooth balls than to see a man for who he is regardless of his age.

Go back and read this thread. A fifteen-year-old could easily be a more mature partner than half of you farkers.

Well, I am glad I have your permission to fark your underage children. OR at least your understanding why I did so.

Not to fark them, no. But if you loved him and you had a consensual relationship I could easily see myself turning a blind eye (but keeping the other eye on you the whole time).

The people who are making this all about sex are you guys, not her.


Sex or Love. It is still wrong in the eyes of the law. She done farked up her entire life over this kid.

As for them possibly having things in common, she must be seriously emotionally retarded to have enough in common with some 15 year old child to develop a relationship with him. And he is that, a child. He is not a man.
 
2012-09-03 12:52:11 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?

Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.


Also, if this woman truly had a deeply rewarding, emotionally fulfilling relationship with a child, why is the sex even necessary? In all these cases it's all about the teacher meeting the child after school for sex, not for a thoughtful conversation on the nature of time, or a spiritual walk through an old-growth forest. It's usually, "Let's fark in the bathroom after school" or "Let's fark in my car after football practice."

Based on the circumstances, it's usually all about farking, and has very little to do with some deep, intellectual bond.
 
2012-09-03 12:55:15 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?


Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

My point is this. She was an award-winning teacher. He is an honors student. It's certainly possible that they were attracted to each other's minds. Maybe they knew it was wrong but risked it anyway because they thought they had a connection. Who the heck knows?

But to ASSUME that she targetted him because she wanted hot young sex, and that she "groomed the entire school" because she is and was always some kind of predator... that is unfounded. People don't win teaching awards because they're trying to fool you (it's not like it's easy to win those things). She won awards because she was a dedicated teacher. This is a sad, sad situation.

You guys are so busy being titillated (giggity) that you've turned what is a human tragedy into some kind of soft core porn. admit it, your hand is in your pants. And you have the nerve to wag your finger at her? She has probably helped more fifteen-year-olds than you ever will.
 
2012-09-03 12:55:33 AM

Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.


For starters, it was not Kool Aid you blithering idiot. Try to pick up a history book instead of the NAMBLA news letter once in a while and actually learn something.

As for the rest of your post, where would you draw the age? Hmm? Since you obviously know more about physiology and psychology and everything else than the rest of us then please enlighten us and tell us where we should draw the line.
 
2012-09-03 12:55:47 AM
It's just sex for fark's sake. Americans really need to get their shiat together. Sex shouldn't end anyone's life, and if it does, then you're doing something wrong.
 
2012-09-03 12:57:37 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?

Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

But before you said this:
The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary.

So what was your point in saying that "the line we draw at 18 is arbitrary" if you admit that we have to draw a line?

Or are you just trolling? If so, just say so. I'd much rather entertain a troll than believe someone could be this farking stupid.

 
2012-09-03 12:57:39 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?

Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

My point is this. She was an award-winning teacher. He is an honors student. It's certainly possible that they were attracted to each other's minds. Maybe they knew it was wrong but risked it anyway because they thought they had a connection. Who the heck knows?

But to ASSUME that she targetted him because she wanted hot young sex, and that she "groomed the entire school" because she is and was always some kind of predator... that is unfounded. People don't win teaching awards because they're trying to fool you (it's not like it's easy to win those things). She won awards because she was a dedicated teacher. This is a sad, sad situation.

You guys are so busy being titillated (giggity) that you've turned what is a human tragedy into some kind of soft core porn. admit it, your hand is in your pants. And you have the nerve to wag your finger at her? She has probably helped more fifteen-year-olds than you ever will.


She acted like she was in high school according to numerous former students. This is just a natural progression for her.
 
2012-09-03 12:59:39 AM

RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.


You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?
 
2012-09-03 12:59:53 AM

Jerseysteve22: Now with linky goodness


You really need to work on your HTML skills.
 
2012-09-03 01:02:10 AM

Lsherm: Jerseysteve22: Now with linky goodness

You really need to work on your HTML skills.


No
 
2012-09-03 01:02:12 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?

Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.


You didn't fark them probably because you didn't fall in love like these two did. It is a rare thing. Arguing from statistics is fallacious when the heart is involved.
 
2012-09-03 01:03:37 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?

Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.


I know, I know. She threw it all away for HIM. Isn't it romantic? *sigh*
 
2012-09-03 01:04:02 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?

Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

My point is this. She was an award-winning teacher. He is an honors student. It's certainly possible that they were attracted to each other's minds. Maybe they knew it was wrong but risked it anyway because they thought they had a connection. Who the heck knows?

But to ASSUME that she targetted him because she wanted hot young sex, and that she "groomed the entire school" because she is and was always some kind of predator... that is unfounded. People don't win teaching awards because they're trying to fool you (it's not like it's easy to win those things). She won awards because she was a dedicated teacher. This is a sad, sad situation.

You guys are so busy being titillated (giggity) that you've turned what is a human tragedy into some kind of soft core porn. admit it, your hand is in your pants. And you have the nerve to wag your finger at her? She has probably helped more fifteen-year-olds than you ever will.


This is not a case of human tragedy. It is a case of human ignorance. This woman knew it was wrong but disregarded that. Who cares if she had a deep, meaningful relationship with this 15 year old child. It was wrong. Sure, you can argue all you want for a possible emotional connection or the possibility of love or whatever else comes to mind, but it does not change the fact that what she did was wrong. She willfully broke the law, and I have no sympathy for her.
 
2012-09-03 01:04:13 AM

Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?

Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.

You didn't fark them probably because you didn't fall in love like these two did. It is a rare thing. Arguing from statistics is fallacious when the heart is involved.


I'm falling in love with you
 
2012-09-03 01:05:48 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Have any of these women come forth and actually said why they prefer to fark teenagers and not actual adults?

Good question. There must be one single pervy reason for ALL of them, and it has to be all about the age and completely about the sex.

It couldn't possibly be that these people are individuals who engage in complex relationships for their own reasons, and there just happens to be an unfortunate and socially unacceptable age difference.

Did I say that there was a unified theory? No. But for some reason you got it in your head that that was what I meant. Which leads to the question, were you born a farking retard or did become one when you started posting online?

What you did is make a statement that it is about farking teenagers instead of adults. What makes you think any of them set out to fark a teenager? Or to fark anyone for that matter? Do you even know how relationships begin? Do you have any experience with relationships with the opposite gender other than fapping between fark posts?

Did she set out to fark a teenager? Only she can answer that. But the answer is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with relationships or farking. It has to do with knowing the difference between right and wrong and acting accordingly. But for some reason this woman decided to throw her entire life away because she did not care that what she was doing was wrong. Plenty of adults (myself included) have worked with teenagers of the opposite sex and have managed to not fark them. Go figure.

Also, if this woman truly had a deeply rewarding, emotionally fulfilling relationship with a child, why is the sex even necessary? In all these cases it's all about the teacher meeting the child after school for sex, not for a thoughtful conversation on the nature of time, or a spiritual walk through an old-growth forest. It's usually, "Let's fark in the bathroom after school" or "Let's fark in my car after football practice."

Based on the circumstances, it's usually all about farking, and has very little to do with some deep, intellectual bond.


What the hell are you talking about? Conversation about the nature of time? Spiritual walk HUH?!!?

You've never gotten laid in your entire life, have you?
 
2012-09-03 01:06:39 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?


So you would be OK if your daughter (assuming you had one and assuming she was a teenager) fell in love with your 33 year old gym teacher he farked her on a regular basis? Somehow I do not think you would be so calm and accepting of it as you are with this story.
 
2012-09-03 01:07:09 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

For starters, it was not Kool Aid you blithering idiot. Try to pick up a history book instead of the NAMBLA news letter once in a while and actually learn something.

As for the rest of your post, where would you draw the age? Hmm? Since you obviously know more about physiology and psychology and everything else than the rest of us then please enlighten us and tell us where we should draw the line.


LoL history book. Which one should I pick up, oh keeper of knowledge?

How old were Romeo and Juliet again?
 
2012-09-03 01:09:20 AM
borderlinegood.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-09-03 01:10:29 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?

Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

But before you said this:
The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary.

So what was your point in saying that "the line we draw at 18 is arbitrary" if you admit that we have to draw a line?

Or are you just trolling? If so, just say so. I'd much rather entertain a troll than believe someone could be this farking stupid.


I started out by trolling but honestly you farkers as so farking disgusting and sex-obsessed that you needed it to be pointed out. As for the line, each society has to decide that. In some states you can actually get married when you're 14. This whole "15? AUTOMATIC OUTRAGE" is incredibly ignorant.
 
2012-09-03 01:12:20 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: So you've drank the kool aid. Glad to get that out of the way.

Your body and brain keep changing till the day you die. The line we draw at 18 is completely arbitrary. This whole victimhood thing is actually a very, very recent development in our social mores. Teachers have been dating students for untold decades if not longer. It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

So do you draw a line anywhere? Can a 70 year old fark a 2 year old in your world? If not, why not?

Draw a line? Of course, we have to draw a line, and we have, and that is why this woman is going to jail. I don't advocate an anything-goes society.

My point is this. She was an award-winning teacher. He is an honors student. It's certainly possible that they were attracted to each other's minds. Maybe they knew it was wrong but risked it anyway because they thought they had a connection. Who the heck knows?

But to ASSUME that she targetted him because she wanted hot young sex, and that she "groomed the entire school" because she is and was always some kind of predator... that is unfounded. People don't win teaching awards because they're trying to fool you (it's not like it's easy to win those things). She won awards because she was a dedicated teacher. This is a sad, sad situation.

You guys are so busy being titillated (giggity) that you've turned what is a human tragedy into some kind of soft core porn. admit it, your hand is in your pants. And you have the nerve to wag your finger at her? She has probably helped more fifteen-year-olds than you ever will.

This is not a case of human tragedy. It is a case of human ignorance. This woman knew it was wrong but disregarded that. Who cares if she had a deep, meaningful relationship with this 15 year old child. It was wrong. Sure, you can argue all you want for a possible emotional connection or the possibility of love or whatever else comes to mind, but it does not change the fact that what she did was wrong. She willfully broke the law, and I have no sympathy for her.


I agree.

It's sad that they fell in love. Not sad that she's going to jail.
 
2012-09-03 01:13:24 AM

Cats_Lie: ]
I started out by trolling but honestly you farkers as so farking disgusting and sex-obsessed that you needed it to be pointed out. As for the line, each society has to decide that. In some states you can actually get married when you're 14. This whole "15? AUTOMATIC OUTRAGE" is incredibly ignorant.


You want to fark children. We get it. We just think it's a bit uncouth. No hard feelings.
 
2012-09-03 01:18:54 AM

Mock26: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?

So you would be OK if your daughter (assuming you had one and assuming she was a teenager) fell in love with your 33 year old gym teacher he farked her on a regular basis? Somehow I do not think you would be so calm and accepting of it as you are with this story.


Actually she was his honors English teacher. The only reason they threw in the tennis part and the cute photos was to keep you titillated. I thought farkers had good media literacy skills???!

If my 15 year old son nailed his hot teacher I'd be stoked. If they fell in love I probably would not approve but I wouldn't assume he was just some piece of meat to her. After all, any son of mine would be awesome and totally date-able.
 
2012-09-03 01:19:58 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?


Honestly, Ms. Letourneau, I really don't think what you did was okay, but I understand now why you are trying to convince us it was a deep relationship.
 
2012-09-03 01:20:50 AM

Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?

So you would be OK if your daughter (assuming you had one and assuming she was a teenager) fell in love with your 33 year old gym teacher he farked her on a regular basis? Somehow I do not think you would be so calm and accepting of it as you are with this story.

Actually she was his honors English teacher. The only reason they threw in the tennis part and the cute photos was to keep you titillated. I thought farkers had good media literacy skills???!

If my 15 year old son nailed his hot teacher I'd be stoked. If they fell in love I probably would not approve but I wouldn't assume he was just some piece of meat to her. After all, any son of mine would be awesome and totally date-able.


I agree, it's why I want to fark him.

Oysters and snails. Oysters and snails.
 
2012-09-03 01:21:04 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: ]
I started out by trolling but honestly you farkers as so farking disgusting and sex-obsessed that you needed it to be pointed out. As for the line, each society has to decide that. In some states you can actually get married when you're 14. This whole "15? AUTOMATIC OUTRAGE" is incredibly ignorant.

You want to fark children. We get it. We just think it's a bit uncouth. No hard feelings.


No, and that is a disgusting and abhorrent thing to accuse someone of. It's just about as funny as joking about raping my daughter (a few posts earlier).

You farkers sure have a twisted sense of what is decent and indecent in the world.
 
2012-09-03 01:22:59 AM
What exactly are titty sprinkles, anyway? Is that the latest fad in schools these days?
 
2012-09-03 01:23:25 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: ]
I started out by trolling but honestly you farkers as so farking disgusting and sex-obsessed that you needed it to be pointed out. As for the line, each society has to decide that. In some states you can actually get married when you're 14. This whole "15? AUTOMATIC OUTRAGE" is incredibly ignorant.

You want to fark children. We get it. We just think it's a bit uncouth. No hard feelings.

No, and that is a disgusting and abhorrent thing to accuse someone of. It's just about as funny as joking about raping my daughter (a few posts earlier).

You farkers sure have a twisted sense of what is decent and indecent in the world.


First you've been bragging how farkable your kids are, and secondly I insisted I wanted it to be consensual, and thirdly you would be happy if your kids had that sort of consensual relationship, AND NOW, IT'S ALL RAPE TO YOU!

Jeez, Mary Kay, this wasn't how I remembered you in class.
 
2012-09-03 01:23:36 AM

Jerseysteve22: Lsherm: Jerseysteve22: Now with linky goodness

You really need to work on your HTML skills.

No


Well, OK then!
 
2012-09-03 01:25:04 AM

Cats_Lie: What exactly are titty sprinkles, anyway? Is that the latest fad in schools these days?


Apparently like these, but dried up cum.

mzlevy.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-09-03 01:25:21 AM

RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?

So you would be OK if your daughter (assuming you had one and assuming she was a teenager) fell in love with your 33 year old gym teacher he farked her on a regular basis? Somehow I do not think you would be so calm and accepting of it as you are with this story.

Actually she was his honors English teacher. The only reason they threw in the tennis part and the cute photos was to keep you titillated. I thought farkers had good media literacy skills???!

If my 15 year old son nailed his hot teacher I'd be stoked. If they fell in love I probably would not approve but I wouldn't assume he was just some piece of meat to her. After all, any son of mine would be awesome and totally date-able.

I agree, it's why I want to fark him.

Oysters and snails. Oysters and snails.


"He's not just some piece of meat. And that's exactly why I'd like to fark him."

Did you miss the point, or just have a crass sense of humor? Hard to tell.
 
2012-09-03 01:25:40 AM
I'm starting to think we should ban any white woman under 50 from being a teacher.
 
2012-09-03 01:26:47 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: Mock26: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: It's not like women have suddenly started becoming more rape-y in the past few years, we've just become more uptight.

Between cell phones, text messages, facebook, porn sites, even more cars and more dual family earners... that's probably not true.

Still, what's your daughters' name?

Why, are you planning on raping her? Hilarious.

You've completely missed the point.

No, I want to have a deeply rewarding, emotional, intellectual, romantic consensual relationship with her. I'm not a rapist, just like that 33 year old teacher wasn't raping her 15 year old student. Sort of a Summer of 42 Thing, I figured you understood.

Also, because of the titty sprinkles.

You're lying. You just want to take advantage of someone younger than yourself.

You don't know her, how could you possibly know you'd love her? Or that she has titty sprinkles?

So you would be OK if your daughter (assuming you had one and assuming she was a teenager) fell in love with your 33 year old gym teacher he farked her on a regular basis? Somehow I do not think you would be so calm and accepting of it as you are with this story.

Actually she was his honors English teacher. The only reason they threw in the tennis part and the cute photos was to keep you titillated. I thought farkers had good media literacy skills???!

If my 15 year old son nailed his hot teacher I'd be stoked. If they fell in love I probably would not approve but I wouldn't assume he was just some piece of meat to her. After all, any son of mine would be awesome and totally date-able.

I agree, it's why I want to fark him.

Oysters and snails. Oysters and snails.

"He's not just some piece of meat. And that's exactly why I'd like to fark him."

Did you miss the point, or just have a crass sense of humor? Hard to tell.


One of us needs less alcohol and/or to go to bed, but I haven't drunk anything this week.
 
2012-09-03 01:26:49 AM

RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: What exactly are titty sprinkles, anyway? Is that the latest fad in schools these days?

Apparently like these, but dried up cum.


You owe me a keyboard
 
2012-09-03 01:27:41 AM

Cats_Lie: RoyBatty: Cats_Lie: What exactly are titty sprinkles, anyway? Is that the latest fad in schools these days?

Apparently like these, but dried up cum.

You owe me a keyboard


Actually I think that is the definition. I'm leaving this thread, enjoy your evening.
 
2012-09-03 01:30:23 AM
Mischief managed, troll accomplished. Good night all.
 
2012-09-03 01:34:47 AM
That's my hometown, doin' me proud!

/the whole "Edison's Laboratory" thing was getting stale anyhow
 
2012-09-03 01:43:36 AM
143 posts and everyone has missed the obvious:

We've finally found a non-lesbian female tennis instructor.
 
2012-09-03 01:45:36 AM

Lionel Mandrake: Awkwardly for 20 seconds?


And again.

And again.

And again.

Maybe she is into quality, not quantity.
 
2012-09-03 01:47:53 AM

Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Maybe it wasn't about age or sexuality but maybe they had things in common, you know, a real relationship?

What's scary is some people actually believe this.


As a former 15-year-old male, I have definitely believed that.

Now that I'm over 30 I tend to think of anyone under 25 who's trying to forge a long-term relationship as borderline mentally retarded, but under-25 me would have told over-30 me to fark off less than a sentence in to an explanation of why... and under-18 me wouldn't have even listened to that much.

I think, in the cases of adults having sex with high school students, the focus in the law should be less on age and more on abuse of authority - it's never OK for a school employee to have sexual or even romantic contact with a student of that school district (Sorry, Billy Madison), just like it's never OK for a psych/-iatrist/-ologist to do the same with a patient, a prison guard with a prisoner etc etc.
 
2012-09-03 01:49:51 AM

Cats_Lie: Dow Jones and the Temple of Doom: Cats_Lie: ]
I started out by trolling but honestly you farkers as so farking disgusting and sex-obsessed that you needed it to be pointed out. As for the line, each society has to decide that. In some states you can actually get married when you're 14. This whole "15? AUTOMATIC OUTRAGE" is incredibly ignorant.

You want to fark children. We get it. We just think it's a bit uncouth. No hard feelings.

No, and that is a disgusting and abhorrent thing to accuse someone of. It's just about as funny as joking about raping my daughter (a few posts earlier).

You farkers sure have a twisted sense of what is decent and indecent in the world.


Hey man, you're the one arguing that 18 is just an "arbitrary age" and that a 15 year old can have a deep, emotionally stable relationship with a 30 year old. Don't blame me because you're being unclear.
 
2012-09-03 01:50:00 AM

stiletto_the_wise: I wonder if the same Internet Tough Guys in the "drunk fingerbanging" thread are going to all show up to again call for the harshest of penalties to be dealt to this obviously dangerous rapist.


Why not just send two players from the football team over to the tennis courts every time practice is called? Seems like the two problems can cancel each other out.
 
2012-09-03 01:51:41 AM

Lsherm: That's a categorically false statement. You can manually stimulate someone to ejaculation even if they aren't willing.


Especially when the manipulatee is 15 and the manipulator is hot.
 
2012-09-03 01:57:30 AM

Mock26: For starters, it was not Kool Aid you blithering idiot. Try to pick up a history book instead of the NAMBLA news letter once in a while and actually learn something.

As for the rest of your post, where would you draw the age? Hmm? Since you obviously know more about physiology and psychology and everything else than the rest of us then please enlighten us and tell us where we should draw the line.


Uh, I think the most recent literature on the subject indicates that humans don't have fully-formed frontal-lobes - the part of the brain that understands consequences and makes decisions - until somewhere around age 25.

So if you really want to "protect the children," or you're going to say "they're not emotionally ready to make decisions," then high school has to last until 21 and college has to last until 26 just to be safe.
 
Displayed 50 of 198 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report