If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   What they say: Bain's a horrible evil corporate scumweasel blight on all that is noble and good, who will be first against the wall when the revolution comes. What they do: Sheeeeit, would you look at those returns. We're parking our money at Bain   (nypost.com) divider line 103
    More: Obvious, Sheeeeit, Ford Foundation, pension system, evils, walls  
•       •       •

1922 clicks; posted to Politics » on 02 Sep 2012 at 9:36 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



103 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-09-03 12:06:00 PM

knobmaker: Here's how Bain did it: They told the company's management that if they did not resist the takeover, there would be large executive compensation for them. They put in a small amount of their own money, borrowed many times as much, bought a controlling interest with the money, saddled the company with a huge amount of debt, stripped assets


You're so full of it it is astounding.

There's no reason to "strip a company of its assets" if it is possible to make it profitable. There's more money to be made in using assets to make stuff than simply selling them for pennies on the dollar.

Yankees Team Gynecologist: Of course he doesn't.

Guys like o5iiawah can vote, people. Just let that sink in.


And so can people like you who get the bulk of their political and financial knowledge from the editorial pages of Mother Jones. Was Dunkin Donuts liquidated? Was Staples? Was Sports authority? The attacks on Bain are simply butthurt from people who tried to go to their company's trough one too many times and found that Bain had removed it.

You figure that banks would stop lending to Bain the second time they decided to take out massive loans against the assets of a company, sell the assets and stiff the bank with the loan from a company that exists only on paper. Banks are more likely to lend to Bain and the companies they take over in the interest of making the company profitable.

Maybe you're just stupid and dont realize how wrong you are or you're so outraged over the fact that there's a market in this country for venture capital that you dont even know what they do. I'm not sure which is sadder.
 
2012-09-03 01:05:28 PM

o5iiawah: There's no reason to "strip a company of its assets" if it is possible to make it profitable. There's more money to be made in using assets to make stuff than simply selling them for pennies on the dollar.


Of course there is. A company like Bain is in it for the fast buck, not the slow, laborious one. There are 2 ways to recoup your investment and make a tidy profit within 12 months or so:

- Max out the company's credit card and issue colossal dividends (that was GST Steel - you can look it up, you know.)
- Sell everything that isn't nailed down and issue colossal dividends.

The third one take a little longer, and that that's the time-honored "cut everything to the bone, then sell the gutted company while it still has a full order book and before the hollow shell collapses".

And if, against all odds, the host organism survives the first bloodletting? Well, so much the better. Every good parasite knows it doesn't do to kill all the host organisms.

If GST Steel had muddled through with its extra debt burden, well, that would have been preferable, but it clearly wasn't a matter of much concern to Bain. After all, they grabbed $30 million out of the tiller the first year - money, to recap, that GST steel had gotten by issuing bonds.

Dunkin' Donuts is interesting - Bain realized that the buying public can't tell junk food from garbage and so took over a chain known for making good donuts, used their brand to market mass-produced donuts and in the process - well, obviously - eradicated a bunch of decent jobs for McService positions.

They're not there to keep the big machine of capitalism running. They're there to steal the grease out of its bearings.
 
2012-09-03 01:48:08 PM

o5iiawah: There's no reason


o5iiawah: You figure


This is your brain trying to "reason," and your brain trying to "figure."

These conclusions mean nothing compared to what actually happened.
 
Displayed 3 of 103 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report