If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support
style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
No one noted the most obvious and bizarre piece of journalistic strangeness in this article? They actually managed to correctly identify the specific firearms and ammunition involved - at no time invoking the mighty catch-all, "Glock!"
Pulitzer candidate right here folks, write 'em in if you have to. Actual reporting - gasp.
Really, subby? You're wondering why a search for weapons and evidence turned up evidence?
The better question would be: How many times do you have to see a guy pull a razor blade out of his hair and a handcuff key out of his crack before you learn to search literally everything, every time? Cause for me that number was one.
![[TotalFark]](http://img.fark.net/images/2003/totalfark.gif "[TotalFark]"){kind=small}
