I actually only had "one day" for my guess as to when someone would willfully misinterpret that article and lie about it. Guess I was off.

I'm glad to see everyone just chilled on cman. He reminds me that conservatives aren't all Hoverround Teatards. Some of them actually engage the subject.

cameroncrazy1984: cameroncrazy1984: cman: There is a difference between agreeing with Obama on a lot and complete loyalty. I am curious, have you ever criticized him on Fark?

Yep.

And even if I didn't, what makes you think that I would be blindly loyal? Why couldn't I just agree with what he does? Is that impossible to do while being informed? If so, why?

Normally one does not find a politician where they can agree with 100% of the policies. Me, for instance, I support Gary Johnson. I like him and his positions. Be that as it may, that does not mean I am in total agreement. For instance, I am against the balanced budget amendment to the US Constitution because I believe that the government needs to have some flexibility. Not only that, he and I have some differences of opinion on taxation issues (he supports FairTax, I support a flat tax). This is the man who I will be voting for in the upcoming election.

I showed you that, although I support Johnson, I do not agree with him on everything. I do not recall you ever doing the same for Obama. So, let me answer your question with a question, what dont you like about the President? If you cannot answer that, then you will understand what blind loyalty is; where you find absolutely no fault

cameroncrazy1984: friday13: Guys, seriously, don't make me defend cman. He's one of the last rational(-ish) conservatives left on this site

hubiestubert is a rational consevative. cman is a both-sides-are-bad I'm-voting-for-totally-not-Republican-Gary-Johnson(R-NM) Fark Independent.

Cman will at least try to defend his position. I've taken the farky off him as he shows signs of thinking, not just spewing talking points and threadshiating.

Nemo's Brother: Lsherm: Bontesla: Pretty sure using his potentially hypothetical black girlfriend as evidence that he isn't racist is counterproductive to his point.

He isn't and he hasn't. The only people who give a shiat about his black ex-girlfriend are liberals, because liberals are obsessed with race.

This.

So, you're a liberal?

You must be, as you seem to be obsessed with race.

shotglasss: Really?

Hmmmmm. Who did Mr. Byrd endorse in 2008? Do you know?

I hear he made his endorsement AFTER his State voted in the primary.

So, again, who did he endorse?

shotglasss: Really?

DRINK!

cameroncrazy1984: cman: I showed you that, although I support Johnson, I do not agree with him on everything. I do not recall you ever doing the same for Obama. So, let me answer your question with a question, what dont you like about the President? If you cannot answer that, then you will understand what blind loyalty is; where you find absolutely no fault

Your entire premise is based upon the notion that because you don't agree 100% with the candidate that you support, I must not either? That's a weird place to start from.

Obama has been President for 3 years. If you cannot find fault at all during his Presidency, then you meet the standard.

Kevin72: Pope Larry II: cameroncrazy1984: friday13: Guys, seriously, don't make me defend cman. He's one of the last rational(-ish) conservatives left on this site

Cman will at least try to defend his position. I've taken the farky off him as he shows signs of thinking, not just spewing talking points and threadshiating.

All that being said, it was still a waste of time and braincells to have to slog through all that /I didn't read it/ /I apologize/ /well at least he admits he is wrong/

Then put me on ignore. No one is forcing you to read what I say

cameroncrazy1984: cman: Obama has been President for 3 years. If you cannot find fault at all during his Presidency, then you meet the standard

You simply cannot believe that someone would agree with Obama based on factual evidence and the reality on the ground. Interesting.

No, I cannot believe that someone will always agree with Obama 100% of the time.

cman: cameroncrazy1984: cman: I showed you that, although I support Johnson, I do not agree with him on everything. I do not recall you ever doing the same for Obama. So, let me answer your question with a question, what dont you like about the President? If you cannot answer that, then you will understand what blind loyalty is; where you find absolutely no fault

Your entire premise is based upon the notion that because you don't agree 100% with the candidate that you support, I must not either? That's a weird place to start from.

Obama has been President for 3 years. If you cannot find fault at all during his Presidency, then you meet the standard.

You almost had me (and, I suspect, a lot of other Farkers) on your side until you started with this idiocy.

But, now I see that you're an absolute moron and you deserve ALL the opprobrium you get.

eraser8: cman: cameroncrazy1984: cman: I showed you that, although I support Johnson, I do not agree with him on everything. I do not recall you ever doing the same for Obama. So, let me answer your question with a question, what dont you like about the President? If you cannot answer that, then you will understand what blind loyalty is; where you find absolutely no fault

Your entire premise is based upon the notion that because you don't agree 100% with the candidate that you support, I must not either? That's a weird place to start from.

Obama has been President for 3 years. If you cannot find fault at all during his Presidency, then you meet the standard.

You almost had me (and, I suspect, a lot of other Farkers) on your side until you started with this idiocy.

But, now I see that you're an absolute moron and you deserve ALL the opprobrium you get.

You are probably right. I am a moron who should off myself

cman: eraser8: cman: cameroncrazy1984: cman: I showed you that, although I support Johnson, I do not agree with him on everything. I do not recall you ever doing the same for Obama. So, let me answer your question with a question, what dont you like about the President? If you cannot answer that, then you will understand what blind loyalty is; where you find absolutely no fault

Your entire premise is based upon the notion that because you don't agree 100% with the candidate that you support, I must not either? That's a weird place to start from.

Obama has been President for 3 years. If you cannot find fault at all during his Presidency, then you meet the standard.

You almost had me (and, I suspect, a lot of other Farkers) on your side until you started with this idiocy.

But, now I see that you're an absolute moron and you deserve ALL the opprobrium you get.

You are probably right. I am a moron who should off myself

And no, I wasnt being facetious

The Root article was abominable, but not for the reasons Townhall claims. Kelli Goff, author of the original article, never accused Paul Ryan of being racist, but she did poison the well by suggesting that he might just be a racist - who knows?

It's a common technique of demagogues. "I'm not saying that my opponent is a child molester. There's no evidence to support that claim. Only he knows for sure whether he is."

It's insincere, indecent, and inexcusable.

cman: You are probably right. I am a moron who should off myself

As much as I disagree with EVERYTHING you write, I like you. I genuinely like you.

That wasn't always the case. At one point you were just a Republican shill. But, you changed. You started being rational.

In any case, I haven't stopped being in your corner. I've just stopped being in your corner in this SPECIFIC argument. Hope you get my meaning from this.

I think you're an overall asset to Fark.

Hopefully, we'll get the chance to be uncivil towards one another in the near future.

eraser8: cman: You are probably right. I am a moron who should off myself

As much as I disagree with EVERYTHING you write, I like you. I genuinely like you.

That wasn't always the case. At one point you were just a Republican shill. But, you changed. You started being rational.

In any case, I haven't stopped being in your corner. I've just stopped being in your corner in this SPECIFIC argument. Hope you get my meaning from this.

I think you're an overall asset to Fark.

Hopefully, we'll get the chance to be uncivil towards one another in the near future.

Pardon me

When you are up for three days straight on amphetamines you tend to be even more of an idiot than usual

cman: When you are up for three days straight on amphetamines you tend to be even more of an idiot than usual

Didn't mean to call you an idiot...because that's not what I think of you.

But, since you mentioned it, how can I get my hands on pharmaceutical grade amphetamines?

/that was a joke
//I don't need uppers
///all my drugs come from my doctor
////and, he's pretty scrupulous about only writing prescriptions that are medically indicated

Vegan Meat Popsicle: The whole "I'm just asking questions" meme is mostly limited to conservatives... Paul Ryan has already clearly shown that he views women as inferiors and that he's a massive classist... he's a vile human being...

You're in the bottom 1 percentile of self-awareness.

eraser8: But, since you mentioned it, how can I get my hands on pharmaceutical grade amphetamines?

Its actually pretty damn easy. When you live in an apartment complex with a bunch of crackheads as neighbors, they tend to have nephews/nieces who have ADHD.

Its getting meth that is hard here in my state

eraser8: Didn't mean to call you an idiot...because that's not what I think of you.

But you are right. I can be very idiotic.

I'm not about to say that there isn't a racist problem in the Republican Party, but this article is pretty close to the textbook definition of "playing the race card."

Are people still talking about Ryan's Canadian gf?