Acharne: You're so out to lunch it is deadly. Iranians do not hate the United States. Their a bit bitter about the restoration of the monarchy, but that's because they had a stable democracy before.Iran does not want to build nuclear weapons. To think so is to jump into this ongoing narrative that is so tired.Remeber. Iranians hate their government. They don't hate Israel. Don't confuse the two. The Iranian government is horrible. The average Iranian is not.You're post is dangerous lunacy.
00batou: First the writer of this article notes the presence of an Iranian Fatwa against all WMDs, then he says:"Sixth, a strike would likely neither completely destroy the Iranian nuclear program, nor cause a major delay to the program."Anyone else find this logic a bit strange?
Heraclitus: Is it sad that we have to have an excuse NOT to attack someone?
fusillade762: Second, the IAEA in the past decade, following more than 4,000 inspection hours, frequently and constantly has declared that there is no evidence of diversion in Iranian nuclear activity toward building a weapon.Third, the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) has maintained that Iran does not have nuclear weapons, has not made the decision to build them and is not on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons. The international community also accepts this conclusion.It amazes my how little attention these two points get in the media. Though after the circus that was the leadup to the Iraq war I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Why question the casus belli when you can just stomp your feet and salute the flag?
Mugato: Well if Romney wins then the whole issue will be moot, because we'll be balls deep in Iran. Probably Syria too. Whatever Israel tells us.
LeglessDog: As for the author of this [bullshiat] article--if you'll take the time to read the notation at the bottom, you'll notice:from 2003 to 2005, he served as spokesman for Iran in its nuclear negotiations with the European Union//garbage
limboslam: Got as far as reason number one:"First, Iran has become the leading country in the Muslim world advocating for an end to nuclear weapons by religiously committing itself against weapons of mass destruction (WMD)"And realized the author of this article is out of his mind.
Quasar: Technically, it is a problem we caused.
Gyrfalcon: Newt already said the war would pay for itself and would take a year, tops.
Mugato: Makh: While those are very compelling reasons, I counter with; Iran has oil. Lots of it.Right, because invading oil rich countries has made gas prices plummet for us so far.
Makh: While those are very compelling reasons, I counter with; Iran has oil. Lots of it.
If you like these links, you'll love
More funny for your money.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 12 2017 21:36:45
Runtime: 0.473 sec (473 ms)