If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   Fox News and News Corp. have donated close to $60,000 to reelect public enemy #1   (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com) divider line 80
    More: Amusing, News Corp.  
•       •       •

5459 clicks; posted to Politics » on 23 Aug 2012 at 9:12 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



80 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-08-23 05:18:57 PM
it's the least they could do considering they spend all their airtime running GOP propaganda against him. fair and balanced yo.
 
2012-08-23 05:23:42 PM
Breaking news: Corporations donate money to politicians whom you don't support.

/shocked
 
2012-08-23 05:44:13 PM
Of course they did. Obama is good for their business.
 
2012-08-23 07:31:51 PM
Does the money from the employees compensate for how media coverage tilts heavily in favor of Romney?
 
2012-08-23 07:32:00 PM
Rupert Murdoch =/= Fox News.
 
2012-08-23 07:37:39 PM

fusillade762: Rupert Murdoch =/= Fox News.


Really? I guess Roger Ailes is probably more on-target, yes?
 
2012-08-23 07:59:31 PM
I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.
 
2012-08-23 08:05:40 PM

Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.


Ding ding ding
 
2012-08-23 08:10:20 PM
Well, they have to be fair and balance out the 24 hours a day of propaganda they give to the Republican party?
 
2012-08-23 08:12:33 PM
Obama does more for Fox's bottom line than all their commentators put together.
 
2012-08-23 09:14:02 PM
Employees of.
 
2012-08-23 09:15:07 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-08-23 09:15:07 PM
This has nothing to do with wanting Obama to win or lose, it's about currying favor with those in charge of the agencies that regulate your business. Fox News, like every corporation, wants as much say in the regulation of their industry as possible. Since money is speech, this is how they get their say in the process.
 
2012-08-23 09:15:56 PM
John Dillinger is running for President?
 
2012-08-23 09:19:32 PM
Flava FLAV!
 
2012-08-23 09:21:58 PM

Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.


Plus Ailes still gets his way if the Senate and Congress have a GOP majority, giving the GOP 2/3rds of the current government.
 
2012-08-23 09:22:12 PM
Well yeah. Without Obama, you have no conservative outrage. They would have to make up more as opposed to have something readily available. You don't think Fox News is in the business of just making stuff up, do you?
 
2012-08-23 09:22:41 PM
It's just self interest. Each side is many things, but the Republicans are, because of the whole values thing, more likely to continue and increase media censorship. Just as an oil company will try to get Republicans in power, so too will even the lowest of the conservative rags donate more to Democrats. Free market, no?
 
2012-08-23 09:25:18 PM

unlikely: Does the money from the employees compensate for how media coverage tilts heavily in favor of Romney?


unlikely.
 
2012-08-23 09:28:31 PM
Well there are women who work at Newscorp so this is no surprise.
 
2012-08-23 09:28:45 PM

Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.


Well of course, back when Clinton was in was the the last time I heard how the UN was going to take over until Obama.Now I hear it again, more derp for everyone.
 
2012-08-23 09:31:02 PM

StopLurkListen: [i.imgur.com image 300x167]


Watching the president "rub one out" was not on my to do list tonight but thanks for the visual anyhow.
 
2012-08-23 09:31:19 PM

Gotfire: Well there are women who work at Newscorp so this is no surprise.


huh?
 
2012-08-23 09:33:09 PM
Rupert Murdoch is a staunch liberal, having hosted fundraisers for and advocating on behalf of the likes of Hillary Clinton and Biraq Obama. This should not surprise anyone. Fox News is just political entertainment for rubes, designed to make money. It's not an ethos for anyone other than Ailes and his minions.
 
2012-08-23 09:34:17 PM

Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.


It works for Rush.
 
2012-08-23 09:38:21 PM
Fox News will get a larger ratings share if Obama wins just like rush limbaugh.
The Haters have to go somewhere that shares their feelings and inject more reasons to hate OBama even more.
Feed the Hate,Feed the Hate...
 
2012-08-23 09:41:07 PM

clowncar on fire: StopLurkListen: [i.imgur.com image 300x167]

Watching the president "rub one out" was not on my to do list tonight but thanks for the visual anyhow.


Aaaaaand the audio. You're welcome!
"There are white folks, and then there are ignorant motherfarkers like you"
 
2012-08-23 09:45:31 PM
Okay, so that's $58k.... how many MILLIONS has Murdoch given to the Right?
 
2012-08-23 09:47:09 PM
So, I can feel better about watching Glee?
 
2012-08-23 09:51:05 PM

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: So, I can feel better about watching Glee?


No. Never.
 
2012-08-23 09:53:18 PM

GleeUnit: Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.

Ding ding ding


$60K seems kinda low. Rush Limbaugh can't pad his retirement without Obama in the White House and Fox needs them, too, as you pointed out. F*ckers won't even pay for their meal ticket.
 
2012-08-23 09:56:25 PM
It's ALMOST like the people on Fox News don't actually believe the idiotic shiat they're spewing and are just using it as a way to broker book deals/get on TV!!!
 
2012-08-23 10:05:03 PM
60,000 dollars is nothing.
 
2012-08-23 10:08:21 PM

Empty Matchbook: It's ALMOST like the people on Fox News don't actually believe the idiotic shiat they're spewing and are just using it as a way to broker book deals/get on TV!!!


I can't believe you'd say such a thing.
 
2012-08-23 10:18:28 PM

goodbomb: 60,000 dollars is nothing.


That's 12,120 tacos.
 
2012-08-23 10:18:33 PM

Ghastly: I would not be surprised if it turns out ratings on FOX news are higher when there is an "enemy" in the whitehouse than when there is a friendly in the whitehouse. Conservatives are more afraid with a democrat in the whitehouse than they are with a republican in the whitehouse and when they're afraid they tune in to FOX for their talking points and instructions.


Abso-farking-lutely.
 
2012-08-23 10:19:56 PM

minoridiot: Of course they did. Obama is good for their business.


This oh so much this. It was my very first thought on seeing the headline.
 
2012-08-23 10:23:09 PM

elchip: Employees of.


This. Right there in TFA.
 
2012-08-23 10:24:29 PM

Makh: Well yeah. Without Obama, you have no conservative outrage.


Right, that's why Fox News nearly went out of business during the Bush years.
 
2012-08-23 10:25:58 PM
When Dems win, their derp and their ratings go way up. I have no doubt that Ailes and Murdoch and many other right-wing pundits are secretly hoping for an Obama win.
 
2012-08-23 10:26:30 PM
$60,000 is a lot cheaper than an IRS audit.
 
2012-08-23 10:26:35 PM
I see this is just donations to the campaign though. I would expect the SuperPAC contribution numbers to be quite different.
 
2012-08-23 10:34:38 PM

Angry Buddha: elchip: Employees of.

This. Right there in TFA.


It seems that even Rupert Murdoch's employees don't believe the bullschitt that Fox Izvestia spews.
 
2012-08-23 10:36:08 PM

cfffffgagffacfacfacfacfacccccfcaaffff: goodbomb: 60,000 dollars is nothing.

That's 12,120 tacos.


You buy some expensive tacos, I think. If nothing else, try taco bell - you can get plenty of food for almost nothing. Why do you think all the stoners head there after toking up. Just don't try to pay with a 2 dollar bill. I did once, and they wouldn't accept it - said it was fake.
 
2012-08-23 10:37:06 PM
Hatred and derp for another 4 years drives ratings more than Mittron 2000. And if they can frame their lying narrative even more tautly, they can get a better candidate than Mittron 2000 in 2016.
 
2012-08-23 10:38:50 PM

Shaggy_C: Rupert Murdoch is a staunch liberal, having hosted fundraisers for and advocating on behalf of the likes of Hillary Clinton and Biraq Obama. This should not surprise anyone. Fox News is just political entertainment for rubes, designed to make money. It's not an ethos for anyone other than Ailes and his minions.


Act II, solid. Act I, WTF am I reading?
 
2012-08-23 10:39:13 PM

I May Be Crazy But...: cfffffgagffacfacfacfacfacccccfcaaffff: goodbomb: 60,000 dollars is nothing.

That's 12,120 tacos.

You buy some expensive tacos, I think. If nothing else, try taco bell - you can get plenty of food for almost nothing. Why do you think all the stoners head there after toking up. Just don't try to pay with a 2 dollar bill. I did once, and they wouldn't accept it - said it was fake.


i16.photobucket.com
 
2012-08-23 10:41:43 PM

GranoblasticMan: I May Be Crazy But...: cfffffgagffacfacfacfacfacccccfcaaffff: goodbomb: 60,000 dollars is nothing.

That's 12,120 tacos.

You buy some expensive tacos, I think. If nothing else, try taco bell - you can get plenty of food for almost nothing. Why do you think all the stoners head there after toking up. Just don't try to pay with a 2 dollar bill. I did once, and they wouldn't accept it - said it was fake.

[i16.photobucket.com image 278x240]


Point taken.
 
2012-08-23 10:42:48 PM

coeyagi: Act II, solid. Act I, WTF am I reading?


How quickly we forget...
 
2012-08-23 10:47:36 PM

Shaggy_C: coeyagi: Act II, solid. Act I, WTF am I reading?

How quickly we forget...


Yeah, apparently being a celebrity is now a liberal thing. Did you read the article? Murdoch praised him for his ability to create paywalls and sell paper.
 
Displayed 50 of 80 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report