eraser8: Why is this a problem?Seriously, what's the big deal?
Watchdog group says there is more implied nudity on prime time television
gunga galunga: eraser8: Why is this a problem?Seriously, what's the big deal?Because "think of the children" that's why.
Pro Zack: Next they will be complaining that the actors are naked under their clothes.
eraser8: Think of the children?
Pro Zack: eraser8: Think of the children?//shakes tiny fist
TheraTx: [4.bp.blogspot.com image 836x1044]
Ape Shiat Nuts: I agree. There should be less implied nudity on television. And more actual nudity!
puckrock2000: Good thing they weren't watching the Olympics.[s3-ec.buzzfed.com image 490x367]
DROxINxTHExWIND: I'm still pissed that they cancelled the "Side Boob Hour".
quatchi: In each case, the full nudity is obscured by pixilation or strategically placed objects."It's a lot more suggestive than we've seen in the past," said Melissa Henson, spokeswoman for the group.It's that weird Puritan streak that still exists in America all these years later.An inch deep perhaps but miles wide.
Tax Boy: puckrock2000: Good thing they weren't watching the Olympics.[s3-ec.buzzfed.com image 490x367][8.mshcdn.com image 502x319]
derio42: Well, it's a good thing the PTC doesn't watch Japanese television... they might have a brain aneurism.
skinink: I'm still scarred from seeing Dennis Franz' ass on NYPD Blue.
stuffy: If the thought of Howie Mandel and Betty White naked gets you pervy.You have some seriouse mental health issues PTC.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jul 24 2017 01:12:53
Runtime: 0.309 sec (308 ms)