dukwbutter: Mikey1969: dukwbutter: almost all 9mm's are "automatics". This means "semi-automatic"LOL, no circular logic there, 'Automatic means semi-automatic?', you sure you want to stand on that statement?dukwbutter: One trigger pull = 1 round fired = "automatic". The more you know, libtards.Actually, it is "One trigger pull = 1 round fired = semi-automatic>"The more you know, moron.Here's what happens; Magazine fed(Auto-loader pistols) are 'usually' called automatics to set them apart from revolvers, but it IS NOT SET IN STONE, and your "logic" has to be some of the most misinformed bullshiat I've ever seen. You sound about as familiar with guns as Sarah Palin. You can't even use the '1 trigger pull = 1 shot thing in guns, because a double action revolver does not require you to cock the gun in any way to fire, so you can pull the trigger 6 (Or 5, 7, 8 or 9, depending on the revolver), times and it will fire each time without you having to do anything but pull the trigger.But, hey, go ahead and throw out the term "libtards", I usually get accused of being a Liberal because I can't stand the current batch of republicans. Funny how this supposed "Lib" understand the very basic ideas about guns more than you do.Cocksucker, you're not telling me anything. I've fired more rounds through Class III firearms than you could ever dream of. I own more guns than you. People routinely refer to semi-autimatic weapons as automatics. You, sir, are an idiot and a jackass.
theMightyRegeya: Bullseyed: Walker: I'm shocked that the Family Research Council, a "hate group" according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, is causing hate. Hate begets hate. Don't put it out there if you don't want it back.Damn those jews for causing nazis. Damn them!It was the Jews' fault for being the 1%.
xander450: Dear god you're a moron. Kennedy was a Democrat, and GW Bush was neither centrist, leftist or communist.
Bullseyed: Walker: I'm shocked that the Family Research Council, a "hate group" according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, is causing hate. Hate begets hate. Don't put it out there if you don't want it back.Damn those jews for causing nazis. Damn them!
xander450: Bullseyed: odinsposse: Maybe he was just doing that moral exchange thing people were talking about. You know, you eat at Chik-Fil-a and then donate money to a pro-gay group. He just decided to shoot up some anti-gay people instead.Also, can anyone think of another instance of an angry crazy liberal shooting up anything? This may be the first time.Uh, off the top of my head, Lee Harvey Oswald?Right, but this is sort of the point. There was a good deal of violent liberal terrorism in the 70's (most of it outside the US, with notable exceptions, i.e. the Weather Underground). There's very little now - liberal terrorism is these days mostly limited to property crimes. Conservative terrorism, on the other hand, has been remarkably violent for the last couple decades (see list from earlier post).I'm happy to have a reasonable discussion about why that would be, but pretending that's not the case just makes you look like you don't know how to read.
Ker_Thwap: Again Jodeveki,Let's not build a straw man and put words in my mouth. I never said I supported one side of the other. You are arguing with yourself.Someone said they were offended by the hate speech of "burn in hell." I pointed out that both sides often have said nasty things, both left and right. I did not specify FRC or the LGBT. That was all you. I'm a moderate, I have no horse in this race. Stop trying to make it seem like I'm supporting the FRC, it's tacky.
LabGrrl: IvanTheSilent:Timothy McVeigh.They'll say McVeigh wasn't really a conservative. (No, really, I've seen it.)I've also seen them say Eric Rudolph didn't claim to be a Christian....Can I Guiliani the thread and point out that you don't get much more pro-god, anti-gay and right wing than the 9-11 hijackers?
meanmutton: Can we stop calling a pistol an "automatic weapon" now, please?
Walker: I'm shocked that the Family Research Council, a "hate group" according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, is causing hate. Hate begets hate. Don't put it out there if you don't want it back.
Highroller48: zedster: I doubt he had a legally obtained 9mm automatic handgun, not too many of those.I'm always amazed at how few peopole konw the dirfference between "Semi-Automatic" and "Automatic".It's very simple, folks...If more than one bullet comes out when you squeeze the trigger once (a la Robocop), only then is it an "automatic".
odinsposse: Maybe he was just doing that moral exchange thing people were talking about. You know, you eat at Chik-Fil-a and then donate money to a pro-gay group. He just decided to shoot up some anti-gay people instead.Also, can anyone think of another instance of an angry crazy liberal shooting up anything? This may be the first time.
Arcanum: I'm pretty conservative. Most here would think I'm very conservative.It's annoying as all hell when some nutjob is associated with a conservative movement.It would be intellectually dishonest for me to say this nutjob is associated with the gay marriage movement.
Biness: nutbags are nutbags. Was it politically motivated? yep. so right wing has nuts. left wing has nuts. the only real constant is that CNN sucks and must serve their high overlord, liberals
dukwbutter: fluffy2097: dukwbutter: Actually, you know nothing about guns and almost all 9mm's are "automatics". This means "semi-automatic". One trigger pull = 1 round fired = "automatic". The more you know, libtards.lol.I'm not even a gun person and I know you are wrong.A manual gun has to be cocked each time you want to pull the trigger. A pump shotgun would be an example of this. Another example would be a bolt action rifle.A semi-automatic gun ejects the spent shell casing and loads another round into the chamber, as well as cocking the weapon, allowing a shot to be fired every single time you pull the trigger without the shooter having to do anything else. Example, a 1911. a Glock 9mm, Desert EagleA fully automatic weapon is basically the same as an semi-automatic weapon but is designed to allow the weapon to cycle and fire rounds as long as the trigger is pulled. Since this is generally wasteful due to recoil pushing you off target, Automatic weapons frequently have a selector allowing you to use them in Semi automatic fire, fully automatic, and possibly a 3 round burst. Example: M16.Fully automatic weapons are really hard to get ahold of legally unless you want to join the army and use an M16. Need a lot of permits and permission slips.Some semi-automatic weapons can be modified to fire fully automatically, but it's highly illegal. I imagine a lot of semi-automatic weapons aren't able to withstand that kind of force without breaking down tooWrong. Wrong. Wrong. Fully automatic weapons are very easy to get, proving you have no idea what you're talking about. All you need is a class III firearms permit. People do, in fact, routinely refer to semi-automatic pistols, rifles, and shotguns as "automatics", and, if you knew anything about guns (aside from what you read on the intertubes), then you'd know this.
Mr.Tangent: LabGrrl: ...Can I Guiliani the thread and point out that you don't get much more pro-god, anti-gay and right wing than the 9-11 hijackers?Apples and oranges! How can you compare the children of Christ to evil Muslins?
pute kisses like a man: Biological Ali: Ker_Thwap: "I hope you starve" is equally hateful as "burn in hell."Not even remotely.i just hope y'all stub your toes on a cold winter's morn.
Biological Ali: Ker_Thwap: "I hope you starve" is equally hateful as "burn in hell."Not even remotely.
dukwbutter: Shove it up your ass nimrod. You dont know shiat about guns. I grew up with them. Semi-automatic weapons are commonly referred to as "automatics". This is true of shotguns, pistols, and rifles. You wouldnt know because youre a liberal douche and have never fired a gun.
palelizard: Apostrophes are also used for possessives. The act of carrying [the bag and gun] belongs to the volunteer.
RedThree: What I'm wondering is this:The more vocal contigent on the right is quite scared of many things - libruls, gays, muslins, etc - and they are known for being pants-wetting cowards.They, as masters of projection, may be projecting their willingness to be cowed in attempts to scare others ("we came unarmed this time").Will this shooting cause them to back off? Not saying that is a good thing, but I wonder what their reaction will be.
bulldg4life: There's no politics in play when it is a crazy person.
Whichever modmin is responsible for jammiewf:
YOUR BLOG SUCKS
Want the rest of the Farking story? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Sep 26 2017 18:16:38
Runtime: 0.623 sec (623 ms)