If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NYPost)   It's not news; It's CNN. No, really, it's not news   (nypost.com) divider line 151
    More: Stupid, CNN  
•       •       •

19183 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Aug 2012 at 5:07 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



151 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-08-13 05:38:11 PM  

jayhawk88: I_Am_Weasel: Here's an idea, CNN. Instead of holographic news reporters have some GOOD news reporters. Reporting actual news. As exciting as 12 hours of Wolf Blitzer is, it's hardly news. I'm not talking about the news that a dog in Topeka can operate a microwave, more along the lines of what the rebels are doing in that there latest of African countries with political strife. Take us back to a time that included Bernard Shaw said things like " "it's a dichotomy!, it's a dichotomy!", and others uttered the phrase "clearly I've never been there, but I feel like we're at the center of hell".

You used to do news, CNN, but now, now...what the hell is it that you do?

See, this is like the old "MTV should play music videos again" argument. No, they shouldn't, because no one cares about getting their news from TV any longer. Those people that do still watch TV for their news don't really want news, they just want Fox News to tell them that everything they believe is right, and all their problems are someone else's fault.


Not true. I don't need my breaking headlines from the television, but having in-depth pieces and analysis is still nice. The news apps mostly give you a tiny selection of highly truncated stories, the websites aren't great on in-depth video and are overwhelmed with Entertainment "news". CNN needs to go back to doing it's damn job and stop with the iReports BS and headlines like "Are you a Compulsive Ice Chewer?"

Honestly the best news coverage in the US is still the BBC.
 
2012-08-13 05:40:39 PM  

Gosling: Oh for Pete's sake, yadda yadda


Muthafuggin' THIS
 
2012-08-13 05:41:05 PM  

Why Would I Read the Article: I try to watch CNN on weekends from time to time, but Fredricka Whitfield, Soledad Obrien and Don Lemon and so spectacuarly stupid and terrible anchors that it is just impossible. I don't need them to go the Fox route and bring only beauty queens, but finding competent anchors would be a start. I can't speak to the competency of their weekday anchors, but I'm assuming they're also terrible.


I work from home and sometimes have CNN on in the background.

Weekday yes. Terribly. Prime time, Anderson Cooper is good.
 
2012-08-13 05:41:29 PM  

LaraAmber: Honestly the best news coverage in the US is still the BBC.


I presented nicely. But it's hard for me to trust a news reporting organization that is owned by a government,.
 
2012-08-13 05:42:55 PM  

downstairs: Weekday yes. Terribly. Prime time, Anderson Cooper is good.


No daytime Anderson Cooper for you?
 
2012-08-13 05:43:59 PM  
I gave up on CNN when they did that iReport thing.
 
2012-08-13 05:44:26 PM  

uber humper: downstairs: Weekday yes. Terribly. Prime time, Anderson Cooper is good.

No daytime Anderson Cooper for you?


Uhhhhh.... hell no! I prefer to pretend that show doesn't exist.

*puts fingers in ears*
 
2012-08-13 05:45:29 PM  

BMFPitt: I gave up on CNN when they did that iReport thing.


Yeah, this. Lets see... send a seasoned journalist out there via sattelite, or just hope some gawker gets it on their iPhone and sends it to us for free?
 
2012-08-13 05:46:05 PM  

downstairs: uber humper: downstairs: Weekday yes. Terribly. Prime time, Anderson Cooper is good.

No daytime Anderson Cooper for you?

Uhhhhh.... hell no! I prefer to pretend that show doesn't exist.

*puts fingers in ears*


He should be ashamed of himself. I thought that format went out in the 1990's. It's like creating Yahoo all over again.
 
2012-08-13 05:47:06 PM  
I wish they'd take a page from Al-Jazeera International.
 
2012-08-13 05:48:50 PM  

uber humper: He should be ashamed of himself. I thought that format went out in the 1990's. It's like creating Yahoo all over again.


Exactly. If anything, he should be doing more 60 Minutes bits.
 
2012-08-13 05:51:00 PM  
At the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon, the heart of CNN went away when people like Bernard Shaw and Judy Woodruff left.

And Wolf Blitzer has the worst diction in the world.

Fareed Zakaria was the best thing on CNN, but now his cred is in doubt.
 
2012-08-13 05:52:13 PM  
Ok, good. CNN is toast. The only thing America needs now is a 'Der Sturmer' channel to REALLY reel in the audience.
 
2012-08-13 05:52:13 PM  

coco ebert: I wish they'd take a page from Al-Jazeera International.


I've read a few of your posts and very rarely agree with you -- but I'll agree with you about A-J.
 
2012-08-13 05:55:01 PM  

LessO2: Fareed Zakaria was the best thing on CNN, but now his cred is in doubt.


Yeah, I'm hoping that's the last time he'll ever end up with plagiarism on his hands. A lesser journalist would have seen their career come to a screeching halt on that. He's otherwise good enough to where he can still recover from it, but that was a hack mistake that he's better than to make.
 
2012-08-13 05:56:08 PM  
CNN: "mitt romney allegedly raped a baby today. we'll give you more on a candidate/rapist in a bit. But first, a hard-hitting expose on barack obama: Most awesome president ever, or TOO awesome for america?"
 
2012-08-13 05:58:24 PM  
So have fewer channels. You add a new programming niche and all you get is a reduced slice of advertising. Since each channel has a smaller audience, there is less revenue to return into program creation. So everything ends up being a fawning reality show, less because of taste and more because there's no budget.

So consolidate MTV, CNN, The Weather Channel, and the Cartoon Network.

Real Music Videos and Classic Cartoons all day long. None of that reality programming shiat. No commentary or pundits. No shrieking divas. No farking rap shiat. No artless harlots just spreading their buttcheeks to a disco beat. None of that Speed Racer hipster shiat. Scooby Doo sucked cawk in the 70s, still sucks cawk now.

Just Bugs Bunny and Wiley Coyote and Animaniacs and ZZ Top and Pearl Jam. Three minute local weather on the hour. Three minute national news on the half hour.

I'd watch the fook out of that.
 
2012-08-13 06:01:02 PM  
I've got it...a Point/Counterpoint show with Jack Cafferty and Jeanne Moos!
 
2012-08-13 06:02:33 PM  

Gosling: KrispyKritter: it makes one wonder if there is some bizarre conspiracy to make certain anyone with a triple digit IQ will stop buying televisions.

Oh for Pete's sake, will people just stop with this 'the REALLY smart people don't watch television and it's going to die and all televisions in the whole world will be out on the curb any day now because of the Internet' claptrap? It's going to stay. It will. TV's a little more durable than vaudeville. There is intelligent viewing out there if you know where you're looking, and besides, even smart people want to take a load off and watch something dumb sometimes. I don't know about you, but I don't know anyone who's watching Masterpiece Theatre marathons. Or Masterpiece Theatre period. I know full well that Wipeout is silly, stupid, people-fall-down-go-boom guilty pleasure material. I watch it anyway.


I don't know about smart people, but I know the industry is continuing to shed TV patrons. No doubt it will take time, but the writing is on the wall for the packaged high priced provider. They don't offer either high enough quality nor diverse enough content to justify $80 a month basic digital. The only thing I hear from most people is sports.
 
2012-08-13 06:04:47 PM  

Tyranicle: Ok, good. CNN is toast. The only thing America needs now is a 'Der Sturmer' channel to REALLY reel in the audience.


CNN's reverting to the historical mean. Before 60 Minutes, news was not supposed to make money or grab ratings as a thing. News does not pull ratings. News does not make money. News is a loss leader. Good journalism provides prestige to the rest of the media empire.

Seriously. CNN, MSNBC and Fox News keep dickwaving their ratings against each other, but... go compare them to cable as a whole and then see where they all stand. You rarely see their ratings compared to the ratings of non-news networks, and that's because all three stack up terribly. But because cable news has managed to segregate its ratings into a theoretical pocket dimension of suck, Fox News is treated as some sort of juggernaut solely because they get better ratings than CNN and MSNBC, and CNN and MSNBC are treated as flailing dying corpses solely because they get worse ratings than Fox News.
 
2012-08-13 06:05:12 PM  
columbian.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com
 
2012-08-13 06:06:29 PM  

letrole: So have fewer channels. You add a new programming niche and all you get is a reduced slice of advertising. Since each channel has a smaller audience, there is less revenue to return into program creation. So everything ends up being a fawning reality show, less because of taste and more because there's no budget.

So consolidate MTV, CNN, The Weather Channel, and the Cartoon Network.

Real Music Videos and Classic Cartoons all day long. None of that reality programming shiat. No commentary or pundits. No shrieking divas. No farking rap shiat. No artless harlots just spreading their buttcheeks to a disco beat. None of that Speed Racer hipster shiat. Scooby Doo sucked cawk in the 70s, still sucks cawk now.

Just Bugs Bunny and Wiley Coyote and Animaniacs and ZZ Top and Pearl Jam. Three minute local weather on the hour. Three minute national news on the half hour.

I'd watch the fook out of that.


That's the way I feel about it. These BS commentators are there to fill time. Stations devoted to 24 hour news have too much time to burn.

If it makes you feel any better, cable news will be going the route of broadcast news. The younger generation won't have anything to do with it. Just like I have never watched ABC, CBS, NBC news -- because it's for old people; the next generation won't watch cable news. And I'm all for it. It's manipulative crap. All of it!
 
2012-08-13 06:07:15 PM  

I Browse: I've got it...a Point/Counterpoint show with Jack Cafferty and Jeanne Moos!


Abe Simpson yelling at a cloud versus fat woman trying to be Leno.
 
2012-08-13 06:11:04 PM  
By the way, for a package of good journalists, look at this (hotlinked) picture:

www.jackarcher.com

That was Current's Vanguard team circa 2009. All five of these people kick ass. From left, and I've already mentioned two of them:

Kaj Larsen (now with CNN, does CNN Presents)
Mariana van Zeller (now with National Geographic)
Laura Ling (now with E!, does E! Investigates)
Christof Putzel (still with Current)
Adam Yamaguchi (still with Current)
 
2012-08-13 06:11:26 PM  
I remember when it was news every half hour. I like that on the radio. Don't care for opinion, just news.
Unfortunately that model wouldn't work today. We have the Internet, and I use Google news as an aggregator. TV news is done, except perhaps for local programming.

The Internet has devalued music, most TV, news, just about all information, and made it available to everyone. Sort of the common, human goal I think, but where there is no revenue, it may go through some sort of cycle. Media formats die, then someone starts something in the vacuum??

Someone stop Brokaw from talking anymore. Its so low and slow, he is going to start breaking glass or attracting elephants.
 
2012-08-13 06:12:32 PM  

Gosling: Tyranicle: Ok, good. CNN is toast. The only thing America needs now is a 'Der Sturmer' channel to REALLY reel in the audience.

CNN's reverting to the historical mean. Before 60 Minutes, news was not supposed to make money or grab ratings as a thing. News does not pull ratings. News does not make money. News is a loss leader. Good journalism provides prestige to the rest of the media empire.

Seriously. CNN, MSNBC and Fox News keep dickwaving their ratings against each other, but... go compare them to cable as a whole and then see where they all stand. You rarely see their ratings compared to the ratings of non-news networks, and that's because all three stack up terribly. But because cable news has managed to segregate its ratings into a theoretical pocket dimension of suck, Fox News is treated as some sort of juggernaut solely because they get better ratings than CNN and MSNBC, and CNN and MSNBC are treated as flailing dying corpses solely because they get worse ratings than Fox News.


Fox News was second in total viewing in primetime for the second consecutive week among advertising supported basic cable networks (excludes Disney) trailing only USA Network. That's the first time that's happened since the Japan earthquake over a year ago (2/28/11-3/13/11, 3/14/11-3/20/11) and there wasn't a huge news story fueling it this time around. Also the landscape is a bit different this year with TBS being fueled by reruns of The Big Bang Theory and Fox News still managed to average a hundred thousand more viewers in primetime for the week (1.875 million vs. 1.774 million).

Meanwhile in primetime viewership CNN was all the way down at #35 for the week averaging just 512,000 viewers, trailing fox by nearly 1.4 million viewers and even trailing #27 MSNBC's 728,000 viewers by a wide margin.
Fox News #2 In Ad-Supported Basic Cable Primetime Viewers for Second Consecutive Week; CNN Left in the Dust
 
2012-08-13 06:13:46 PM  

coco ebert: I wish they'd take a page from Al-Jazeera International.


Yes, Al-Jazeera does embody the essence of unvarnished, unbiased journalism. They have picked up the torch, dropped by the major broadcast networks in the 80's, carried on by CNN during the Turner reign in the 90's, kept alight by the beeb and PBS during the early naughts... Unfortunately, the BBC and PBS don't offer full time coverage, but, I'm actually sensing, in a tilting at windmills kind of way, a rebirth of actual news outlets. Network news, with its pablum, is being savaged by small outlets and even parody -- TDS and Colbert. I have a feeling that real news will at some point make a comeback. Film at 11...
 
2012-08-13 06:14:44 PM  

Gosling: You rarely see their ratings compared to the ratings of non-news networks, and that's because all three stack up terribly.


They get the viewers, FOX especially, but the problem is they're all old. BillO can sometimes barely crack the 18-49 cable top 100, rarely some other FOX people on a big news day.

On Thursday, BillO got 2.6 million total viewers, but only a 0.2 demographic rating. That total number is pretty good, beating some well known cable shows like Project Runway, but PR gets a 0.7 rating. Even shows like Conan and sitcom repeats with less than a million total viewers can blow away BillO in the 18-49 demographic
 
2012-08-13 06:15:50 PM  

Gosling: Mariana van Zeller (now with National Geographic)


Nat Geo has gone to hell with American Gipsy and the border patrol shiate. There are alot of hardcore researchers, who devoted their life to National Geographic, are rolling in their graves.

Running those shows, is like a nun turning tricks on the side. Except I might watch that.
 
2012-08-13 06:17:16 PM  
CNN's never been great, but it seems like they've taken a giant dip downwards ever since I stopped getting cable and therefore stopped watched it... from what I've heard.

/not my fault
//sorry guys
 
2012-08-13 06:20:57 PM  

uber humper: Gosling: Mariana van Zeller (now with National Geographic)

Nat Geo has gone to hell with American Gipsy and the border patrol shiate. There are alot of hardcore researchers, who devoted their life to National Geographic, are rolling in their graves.

Running those shows, is like a nun turning tricks on the side. Except I might watch that.


Here is a link to one of van Zeller's Nat Geo reports. You judge for yourself.
 
2012-08-13 06:21:22 PM  
It's almost as if cable is hardly worth paying $120-$150 a month for.
 
2012-08-13 06:22:39 PM  

thomps: I_Am_Weasel: Here's an idea, CNN. Instead of holographic news reporters have some GOOD news reporters. Reporting actual news. As exciting as 12 hours of Wolf Blitzer is, it's hardly news. I'm not talking about the news that a dog in Topeka can operate a microwave, more along the lines of what the rebels are doing in that there latest of African countries with political strife. Take us back to a time that included Bernard Shaw said things like " "it's a dichotomy!, it's a dichotomy!", and others uttered the phrase "clearly I've never been there, but I feel like we're at the center of hell".

You used to do news, CNN, but now, now...what the hell is it that you do?

that sounds sooooo booooooring


I'd be just as glad to go back to the Olden Days when there were only three news stations, nobody had to jostle for ratings and advertising, and we actually got NEWS instead of this "fair & balanced" crap.
 
2012-08-13 06:23:41 PM  

InmanRoshi: It's almost as if cable is hardly worth paying $120-$150 a month for.


$96 and change after tax for me for basic ~100 channel cable, HD and DVR, and 10/1 internet.
 
2012-08-13 06:25:40 PM  
www.capitolcommentary.com
 
2012-08-13 06:26:52 PM  

Gosling: uber humper: Gosling: Mariana van Zeller (now with National Geographic)

Nat Geo has gone to hell with American Gipsy and the border patrol shiate. There are alot of hardcore researchers, who devoted their life to National Geographic, are rolling in their graves.

Running those shows, is like a nun turning tricks on the side. Except I might watch that.

Here is a link to one of van Zeller's Nat Geo reports. You judge for yourself.


Thanks, I'll bookmark to watch later.

That's not my point. I'm saying that the brand Nat Geo has been cheapened by low-class filler -- ie. American Gipsy.
 
2012-08-13 06:29:17 PM  
Actually, van Zeller's done three documentaries for Nat Geo so far:

Narco Bling (the one I just linked to)
Sex for Sale: American Escort
Guerrilla Gold Rush (part 1, part 2, part 3)
 
2012-08-13 06:29:47 PM  

smitty04: [www.capitolcommentary.com image 704x547]


Advertisers don't give a fark about old people. And they have good reason to. My one set of grandparents died in the late 90's and their house was stuck in the 60s. My living grandparents house is stuck in the 80s. Old people don't buy a lot of big ticket stuff. Take a look at this, cable ratings from Thursday night.

NFL PRE-SEASON FOOTBALL L ESPN 8:00 PM 3386 1.4
Family Guy ADSM 11:30 PM 3122 1.2
Big Bang Theory, THE TBSC 9:30 PM 2918 1.2
Burn Notice USA 9:00 PM 4036 1.1
Suits USA 10:01 PM 3423 1.1
Family Guy ADSM 11:00 PM 2907 1.1
Big Bang Theory, THE TBSC 9:00 PM 2130 0.9
Anger Management FX 9:30 PM 2100 0.9
Big Bang Theory, THE TBSC 10:30 PM 1950 0.8
American Dad ADSM 10:30 PM 2336 0.8
Awkward SSN 2 MTV 10:31 PM 1815 0.8
SULLIVAN & SON TBSC 10:00 PM 1948 0.8
S OLY PM NBCSN 12:00 PM 2244 0.7
SNOOKI & JWOWW MTV 10:00 PM 1614 0.7
Project Runway LIF 9:00 PM 2027 0.7
SPORTSCENTER LATE L ESPN 11:13 PM 1364 0.7
American Dad ADSM 10:00 PM 2020 0.7
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL ADSM 12:00 AM 1636 0.7
Family Guy TBSC 8:30 PM 1313 0.6
Pawn Stars HIST 9:30 PM 2132 0.6
CAJUN JUSTICE AEN 10:30 PM 1440 0.6
CAJUN JUSTICE AEN 11:01 PM 1379 0.6
MONDAY NIGHT COUNTDOWN L ESPN 7:00 PM 1264 0.6
SpongeBob NICK 10:30 AM 3041 0.6
Anger Management FX 8:59 PM 1361 0.5
Pawn Stars HIST 9:00 PM 1938 0.5
CAJUN JUSTICE AEN 10:00 PM 1339 0.5
AFTER The First 48 AEN 9:00 PM 1307 0.5
SpongeBob NICK 5:30 PM 2753 0.5
FAIRLY ODD PARENTS NICK 11:00 AM 2929 0.5
SpongeBob NICK 10:00 AM 2604 0.5
SPORTSCENTER 12AM L ESPN 12:33 AM 920 0.5
NTSF:SD:SUV:: ADSM 12:15 AM 1257 0.5
Daily Show CMDY 11:00 PM 1374 0.5
Colbert Report CMDY 11:31 PM 1159 0.5
NCIS USA 8:00 PM 2548 0.5
SpongeBob NICK 4:30 PM 2460 0.5
Family Guy TBSC 8:00 PM 1082 0.5
TWO/HALF MEN FX 8:29 PM 1213 0.5
CAJUN JUSTICE AEN 11:31 PM 1079 0.4
Auction Kings DISC 9:00 PM 1249 0.4
Wilfred FX 10:00 PM 947 0.4
FRIENDS NAN 12:35 AM 1188 0.4
SpongeBob NICK 5:00 PM 2636 0.4
DOC MCSTUFFINS DSNY 9:30 AM 2091 0.4
KING OF THE HILL ADSM 9:30 PM 1361 0.4
TWO/HALF MEN FX 7:29 PM 977 0.4
MUSIC VIDEO DSNY 5:25 PM 2747 0.4
IMPACT WRESTLING SPIKE 8:00 PM 1210 0.4
Conan TBSC 11:00 PM 893 0.4
SpongeBob NICK 9:00 AM 2441 0.4
KING OF QUEENS TVL 12:00 AM 1026 0.4
KING OF QUEENS TVL 11:30 PM 1014 0.4
TWO/HALF MEN FX 7:59 PM 1163 0.4
MINNIES BOW-TOONS DSNY 9:25 AM 1879 0.4
VICTORIOUS NICK 6:00 PM 2339 0.4
NCIS USA 6:00 PM 1775 0.4
NCIS USA 7:00 PM 2160 0.4
NEVER LAND PIRATE BAND DSNY 9:55 AM 2040 0.4
MICKEY MOUSE CLUBHOUSE DSNY 9:00 AM 1909 0.4
FRIENDS TBSC 5:30 PM 903 0.4
WORLDS DUMBEST TRU 10:00 PM 902 0.4
Covert Affairs USA 11:02 PM 1186 0.4
KING OF QUEENS TBSC 6:30 PM 849 0.4
KING OF QUEENS TBSC 6:00 PM 839 0.4
SEINFELD TBSC 7:30 PM 960 0.4
GEORGE LOPEZ NAN 1:08 AM 1067 0.4
Louie FX 10:30 PM 703 0.4
NFL PRESEASON LIVE NFLN 7:30 PM 736 0.4
Good Luck Charlie DSNY 10:30 PM 2665 0.4
Pawn Stars HIST 8:30 PM 1505 0.4
HOUSE HUNTERS INTL HGTV 10:30 PM 1240 0.3
KING OF QUEENS TVL 12:38 AM 840 0.3
Chopped ALL-STARS FOOD 9:00 PM 1004 0.3
FRIENDS TBSC 5:00 PM 809 0.3
Pawn Stars HIST 8:00 PM 1288 0.3
TWO/HALF MEN FX 7:00 PM 870 0.3
Chopped ALL-STARS FOOD 10:00 PM 843 0.3
The First 48 AEN 7:00 PM 849 0.3
Auction Kings DISC 10:30 PM 857 0.3
Ancient Aliens HIST 7:00 PM 1065 0.3
WORLDS DUMBEST TRU 9:00 PM 858 0.3
Auction Kings DISC 10:00 PM 897 0.3
HOUSE HUNTERS HGTV 10:00 PM 1111 0.3
BEHIND MANSION WALLS ID 12:00 AM 822 0.3
SEINFELD TBSC 7:00 PM 823 0.3
The First 48 AEN 8:00 PM 877 0.3
Auction Kings DISC 8:30 PM 950 0.3
TOTALLY BIASED FX 11:00 PM 560 0.3
Chopped ALL-STARS FOOD 7:00 PM 819 0.3
EVIL TWINS ID 1:00 AM 774 0.3
Auction Kings DISC 9:30 PM 904 0.3
HOUSE HUNTERS INTL HGTV 11:30 PM 1054 0.3
HOUSE HUNTERS HGTV 11:00 PM 942 0.3
48 HOURS ON ID ID 2:00 AM 771 0.3
EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND TVL 10:30 PM 1010 0.3
EVIL TWINS ID 10:00 PM 860 0.3
BRAVO MOVIE BRVO 8:30 PM 887 0.3
GREAT LAKE WARRIORS HIST 10:00 PM 868 0.3
THE OREILLY FACTOR FOXNC 8:00 PM 2601 0.2

Look at all those shows that did better than BIllO in 18-49, and BillO does so much better than everyone else at FOX News.
 
2012-08-13 06:30:00 PM  
News and late night? Can't you combine the two? I mean, seriously, I know he'd be competition, but seriously, ask Jon Stewart for help. Or hell, just WATCH the daily show and blatantly rip it off. If you can execute it half as well as they can you can get a quality news program that might actually draw viewers. And for god's sake don't put it up against Stewart himself, he'll rip it to shreds. Put it on before or after him, just not at the same time.
 
Ehh
2012-08-13 06:31:02 PM  
hammettman: coco ebert: I wish they'd take a page from Al-Jazeera International.

Yes, Al-Jazeera does embody the essence of unvarnished, unbiased journalism. They have picked up the torch, dropped by the major broadcast networks in the 80's, carried on by CNN during the Turner reign in the 90's, kept alight by the beeb and PBS during the early naughts... Unfortunately, the BBC and PBS don't offer full time coverage, but, I'm actually sensing, in a tilting at windmills kind of way, a rebirth of actual news outlets. Network news, with its pablum, is being savaged by small outlets and even parody -- TDS and Colbert. I have a feeling that real news will at some point make a comeback. Film at 11...


Every time I watch a minute or so of CNN in the morning when the BBC or Al-Jazeera is running a commercial or riding one of its hobby-horses, I just get angry quickly. CNN isn't news. It's propaganda mixed with BS mixed with a high school pep rally.

Next up: What somebody said about somebody else--what's your opinion? We have a collection of idiots to tell you what they think others will say.
 
2012-08-13 06:31:09 PM  

InmanRoshi: It's almost as if cable is hardly worth paying $120-$150 a month for.


Haha...nice.
 
2012-08-13 06:34:35 PM  

Gyrfalcon: I'd be just as glad to go back to the Olden Days when there were only three news stations, nobody had to jostle for ratings and advertising, and we actually got NEWS instead of this "fair & balanced" crap.


Unfortunately, that's not the way progress works. We will not regress to 3 stations that broadcast news a few times a day.

The future will be built more around social media. More user generated content, fewer professional pundits. And more aggregrators like Huffington Post and Drudge.
 
2012-08-13 06:35:39 PM  
Newsroom was really good last night.
 
2012-08-13 06:36:21 PM  

uber humper: Gyrfalcon: I'd be just as glad to go back to the Olden Days when there were only three news stations, nobody had to jostle for ratings and advertising, and we actually got NEWS instead of this "fair & balanced" crap.

Unfortunately, that's not the way progress works. We will not regress to 3 stations that broadcast news a few times a day.

The future will be built more around social media. More user generated content, fewer professional pundits. And more aggregrators like Huffington Post and Drudge.


I know that. I can dream can't I? The more news outlets become media-driven ratings generators, the less news we get, is all. Which is sad, because I used to love CNN for being nothing but a news channel.
 
2012-08-13 06:36:29 PM  

uber humper: That's not my point. I'm saying that the brand Nat Geo has been cheapened by low-class filler -- ie. American Gipsy.


Oh, I'm not disagreeing.

Here's the thing. TV has reached a point where comparing network to network isn't really always the best way to go. Neither is journalism; you can't go organization to organization as a whole. TV and journalism are both at a place where rooting for laundry is going to get you nowhere. Look for the individual performers; the proverbial names on the back of the jersey, not the name on the front. CNN might suck, but Anderson Cooper is good. MSNBC might suck, but Rachel Maddow is good. National Geographic might suck, but Mariana van Zeller is good. OWN might suck, but Lisa Ling is good.

We're in a DVR and hyperlink era. You can go straight to the good parts of any network and any news organization and leave the bad parts to suck in silence. Find the good journalists, then just follow them wherever they happen to migrate.
 
2012-08-13 06:38:53 PM  

Gosling: but I don't know anyone who's watching Masterpiece Theatre marathons. Or Masterpiece Theatre period


*raises hand*

Yeah. I'm boring :(.

*sulks off*
 
2012-08-13 06:39:46 PM  

Gyrfalcon: uber humper: Gyrfalcon: I'd be just as glad to go back to the Olden Days when there were only three news stations, nobody had to jostle for ratings and advertising, and we actually got NEWS instead of this "fair & balanced" crap.

Unfortunately, that's not the way progress works. We will not regress to 3 stations that broadcast news a few times a day.

The future will be built more around social media. More user generated content, fewer professional pundits. And more aggregrators like Huffington Post and Drudge.

I know that. I can dream can't I? The more news outlets become media-driven ratings generators, the less news we get, is all. Which is sad, because I used to love CNN for being nothing but a news channel.


Agreed.
 
2012-08-13 06:44:10 PM  

Gosling: KrispyKritter: it makes one wonder if there is some bizarre conspiracy to make certain anyone with a triple digit IQ will stop buying televisions.

Oh for Pete's sake, will people just stop with this 'the REALLY smart people don't watch television and it's going to die and all televisions in the whole world will be out on the curb any day now because of the Internet' claptrap? It's going to stay. It will. TV's a little more durable than vaudeville. There is intelligent viewing out there if you know where you're looking, and besides, even smart people want to take a load off and watch something dumb sometimes. I don't know about you, but I don't know anyone who's watching Masterpiece Theatre marathons. Or Masterpiece Theatre period. I know full well that Wipeout is silly, stupid, people-fall-down-go-boom guilty pleasure material. I watch it anyway.


Yes, people are going to continue watching TV, but the current model is unsustainable. I watch TV shows, but I don't own a TV, and I don't have cable. Netflix is objectively better. The response of the powers that be to the changing environment is to create more garbage that pushes more people to cancel their cable subscription, and to avoid changing their business model in any significant way. No, TV isn't going away, but things are going to change and a lot of heads are going to roll.
 
2012-08-13 06:44:27 PM  

KatjaMouse: Pretty much going to drop the same comment in here that I just left in TFA but hey:

Well, TLC no longer stands for The Learning Channel, A&E used to give us Arts & Entertainment and the History Channel at least would give us old reels of WWII to watch. Now its about Cake Bosses, prostitots, Ice Road Truckers, and human clown cars. So why WOULDN'T Cable News Network abandon the news?


They also have science on SyFy and scifi on the science channel
 
2012-08-13 06:48:43 PM  
It probably already been said, but lets restore the 'truth in newscasting law' and we can get back to real news on the news stations and delete foxnews at the same time.

/Canadas foxnews north gets around the truth law by having daily 'commentary' from in house d-bags.
//Pre-zombie Reagan removed the truth law.
 
Displayed 50 of 151 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report