If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yorkshire Evening Post)   Man burns wife's designer clothes and shoes, just because she went on holiday and married someone else   (yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk) divider line 169
    More: Scary  
•       •       •

12800 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Aug 2012 at 1:14 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



169 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-08-10 11:27:26 AM
Listen I do not wish to judge the parties in the case of this but I try to see all issues from both sides of the coin which is the Canadian coin because the American dollar is so worthless on these days but anyway I am going on the tangent which was not meant and instead should continue to do the discussion of this issue which is the burning of the clothes when the woman went to the vacation for the marriage with the other.

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.

The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this. No one wishes to be married to the arsonist. Except the fire chief because this would guarantee a future justification for the existence of the job of this individual.
 
2012-08-10 01:14:08 PM
Mr Canning said Mrs Plews had gone to Gambia to meet her new man using money from Plews' business, adding: "She then married him while married to the defendant. Apparently that's legal in Gambia.

But is it legal in the UK? I mean, if someone's spouse went to Gambia and married someone else, they could still be prosecuted for it if they returned to America, right?
 
2012-08-10 01:16:09 PM
He should have moved and left her a "Thank You" card.
 
2012-08-10 01:20:43 PM
D'yer Mak'er?
 
2012-08-10 01:21:23 PM
I kind of felt bad until I read his prior record of grievous bodily harm, etc that requires community service. TFA doesn't release those details of how unstable the hubby might be. Other than the bonfire he lit out of his wife's undies and other items
 
2012-08-10 01:22:09 PM

timujin: Mr Canning said Mrs Plews had gone to Gambia to meet her new man using money from Plews' business, adding: "She then married him while married to the defendant. Apparently that's legal in Gambia.

But is it legal in the UK? I mean, if someone's spouse went to Gambia and married someone else, they could still be prosecuted for it if they returned to America, right?


"You farking Americans. Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we're not going to deal with Iranians marry a Gambian whilst married to a British subject?"

Seriously, though, the marriage probably just wouldn't be recognized here.
 
2012-08-10 01:22:15 PM
Is this pixelated picture day?
 
2012-08-10 01:22:48 PM

timujin: But is it legal in the UK? I mean, if someone's spouse went to Gambia and married someone else, they could still be prosecuted for it if they returned to America, right?


No, they probably wouldn't be prosecuted in the U.S. If they were married in Gambia (however many times) and came to the U.S. and tried to get married at that time...yeah, they're breaking the law. Now, the American government is going to have problems recognizing all of these marriages, but it's not illegal to be multiply-married (recognition aside), it's just illegal to marry in the U.S. when you're already married.
 
2012-08-10 01:23:05 PM

MBooda: D'yer Mak'er


golf clap
 
2012-08-10 01:23:21 PM
Where the white women at?
 
2012-08-10 01:23:28 PM
WOW, Meow Said The Dog, you sound like you are the craptastic person who married anothers wife, is that you?
 
2012-08-10 01:25:14 PM
why can't AMERICANs EVER GO ON HOLIDAY. ALL we ever get is "VACATION".

www.wolfgnards.com
 
2012-08-10 01:25:38 PM
At least she married another man.
Had she married a woman... Why, that would have ruined the "sanctity of marriage" for everyone!
 
2012-08-10 01:25:45 PM

oldfurr: WOW, Meow Said The Dog, you sound like you are the craptastic person who married anothers wife, is that you?


Thank god I have that farker on ignore...
 
2012-08-10 01:26:53 PM
oldfurr: WOW, Meow Said The Dog, you sound like you are the craptastic person who married anothers wife, is that you?

I believe Meow Said the Dog is a female, not a guy.
 
2012-08-10 01:26:55 PM
Burn her stuff? That's pathetic. I would've gotten her wasted drunk and then farked her all night with a Tennessee Popsicle.
 
2012-08-10 01:27:08 PM
What's with all the pixalated pictures in news stories today?
 
2012-08-10 01:27:11 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I do not wish to judge the parties in the case of this but I try to see all issues from both sides of the coin which is the Canadian coin because the American dollar is so worthless on these days but anyway I am going on the tangent which was not meant and instead should continue to do the discussion of this issue which is the burning of the clothes when the woman went to the vacation for the marriage with the other.

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.

The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this. No one wishes to be married to the arsonist. Except the fire chief because this would guarantee a future justification for the existence of the job of this individual.


Ladies and gentlemen meet Pocket Ninja's retarded sibling.
 
2012-08-10 01:27:50 PM
FTFA:

Darrell Plews, 44, wanted to win back his wife Michelle after she met a new man on a holiday in Africa in January.


Dude....don't do that.....you should have dumped her skanky ass immediately.
 
2012-08-10 01:28:42 PM
Hero Tag out shopping at D&G?
 
2012-08-10 01:29:47 PM

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol .

You're implying that if a man wants to keep a woman, she's important as a status symbol.

This implies that marrying a woman never has anything to do with actually caring about her (this is why I've never dated, really: on the rare chance I find a girl I actually care about, she doesn't like me; and otherwise I refuse to play bullshiat games pretending I want to be with a girl to get ... something, sex I guess).

There's always the implication that people are irrational and stupid, and when they've been hurt enough they just lash out and destroy the things they care about. I've always been stable, I guess... I always thought I was horribly unstable, once I called a girl a lying, manipulating slut for constantly leading me on to get me to do things, because I was upset... but I've never felt the need to hit them, to destroy things, to injure. I've always tried to just push across how I felt, to make it understood. I guess maybe I'm stable? Plus every time that's happened I've spent months thinking about it and figuring out where the error was, and as a result my reactions are less extreme and more careful (though still wrong ... less, but still wrong).

From that perspective, though, the ideal that someone could be hurt and lash out is not completely unreasonable to my senses.

Oh well. I have no faith in humanity but I like to think the potential is there, even if it will never be tapped.
 
2012-08-10 01:29:49 PM
Cue up Jungle Fever with British voice dubbing...
 
2012-08-10 01:32:58 PM
*APPLAUSE*
 
2012-08-10 01:34:06 PM
spentmiles: Burn her stuff? That's pathetic. I would've gotten her wasted drunk and then farked her all night with a Tennessee Popsicle.

Instead of using your own popsicle? Unless you think it's too small to get the job done.
 
2012-08-10 01:34:29 PM

Phony_Soldier: meow said the dog: Listen ...

Ladies and gentlemen meet Pocket Ninja's retarded sibling.


I tend to read mstd's posts in the voice of Fez from That 70's Show*. Or maybe an Indian tech support call center worker.

In any case, it must be so much fun to just live inside his head for an hour, just to see what's going on in there.

*Apparently that guy gets insane amounts of vagina, so maybe there's something to that.
 
2012-08-10 01:34:37 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I do not wish to judge the parties in the case of this but I try to see all issues from both sides of the coin which is the Canadian coin because the American dollar is so worthless on these days but anyway I am going on the tangent which was not meant and instead should continue to do the discussion of this issue which is the burning of the clothes when the woman went to the vacation for the marriage with the other.

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.

The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this. No one wishes to be married to the arsonist. Except the fire chief because this would guarantee a future justification for the existence of the job of this individual.


holy run-on sentences batman
 
2012-08-10 01:34:52 PM

Latinwolf: spentmiles: Burn her stuff? That's pathetic. I would've gotten her wasted drunk and then farked her all night with a Tennessee Popsicle.

Instead of using your own popsiclepropecia.? Unless you think it's too small to get the job done.


because i said so.
 
2012-08-10 01:34:53 PM

meow said the dog: One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.


You sound like a moron. Or a troll. Maybe both. Vaguely Engrish-y, too.
 
2012-08-10 01:35:02 PM

Kit Fister: oldfurr: WOW, Meow Said The Dog, you sound like you are the craptastic person who married anothers wife, is that you?

Thank god I have that farker on ignore...


Do you stop by TV show threads to talk about how much you hate the show and how everyone is stupid for watching it?
 
2012-08-10 01:35:16 PM
FTA: "And Plews, who has previous convictions for grievous bodily harm, theft and burglary, must do 200 hours unpaid work."

I like how they just tossed that in right at the end there.
 
2012-08-10 01:36:05 PM
Seriously brosef, she is most likely doing you a major favor.....idiot!
 
2012-08-10 01:37:14 PM
Holy cow, look at all the new Farkers! Well, this is meow said the dog. Reading those posts is a treat, an adventure. It's like LSD without having to actually lick paper!
 
2012-08-10 01:37:52 PM
on the flip side, she should be glad she wasn't wearing those cloths while he torched them.
 
2012-08-10 01:38:37 PM
Something is seriously wrong with the formatting on that website. There's no whitespace between the lines. In fact it looks like they have negative whitespace.
 
2012-08-10 01:39:40 PM
At the risk of coming off like a "men's rights" nozzler, I think if the story were reversed, the Sex and the City crowd would be toasting to the woman's "spunkiness" over cosmos and strappy shoes. (gah. I did come off like one of those guys)

Either way, its not like he hurt anyone, plus 5000 pounds isn't a HUGE sum of money. I think the article only exists to embarrass this guy more for having his wife run off and marry some email scammer.

Personally, and just spit balling here, if I were to destroy a woman's wardrobe, I wouldn't burn it. You burn it and its gone, end of story. I would make small slits in them with a razor, or run a black laundry market over all of them. Something that didn't destroy them, but was very noticeable. Make her make the decision as to whether a ratty designer dress was more valuable than a perfect off-the-rack one. Make her throw out the clothes she loves so much.
 
2012-08-10 01:39:42 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I present a coont.
 
2012-08-10 01:41:00 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I do not wish to judge the parties in the case of this but I try to see all issues from both sides of the coin which is the Canadian coin because the American dollar is so worthless on these days but anyway I am going on the tangent which was not meant and instead should continue to do the discussion of this issue which is the burning of the clothes when the woman went to the vacation for the marriage with the other.

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.

The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this. No one wishes to be married to the arsonist. Except the fire chief because this would guarantee a future justification for the existence of the job of this individual.



Laughter OL.

/that is all.
//meow said the dog is the Mos Eisley of Fark.
 
2012-08-10 01:41:53 PM
I only have two farkers on ignore. One is HeartlessLibertarian who trolled the Reno air crash thread.
 
2012-08-10 01:43:36 PM

meow said the dog: The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this.



How is that the other side.
 
2012-08-10 01:43:52 PM
The wife is a biatch and the husband should have found more creative ways to screw with her.
 
2012-08-10 01:44:26 PM

stevarooni: Holy cow, look at all the new Farkers! Well, this is meow said the dog. Reading those posts is a treat, an adventure. It's like LSD without having to actually lick paper!


Yeah, I was going to say it wouldn't be summer without MSTD. I don't get the haters.
 
2012-08-10 01:45:43 PM

Abox: meow said the dog: The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this.


How is that the other side.


It just is, man.
/hits joint.
 
2012-08-10 01:45:48 PM
I read half the article and decided she got off easy.
 
2012-08-10 01:50:32 PM

Harvey Manfrenjensenjen


Yeah, I was going to say it wouldn't be summer without MSTD. I don't get the haters.


No hate here, but no interest either. IMO the ESL/ETL/EFL schtick passed its prime in about three sentences.
 
2012-08-10 01:53:35 PM

timujin: Mr Canning said Mrs Plews had gone to Gambia to meet her new man using money from Plews' business, adding: "She then married him while married to the defendant. Apparently that's legal in Gambia.

But is it legal in the UK? I mean, if someone's spouse went to Gambia and married someone else, they could still be prosecuted for it if they returned to America, right?


Funny story...

My grandfather left my grandmother to get a divorce in Mexico. This wasn't legal (people went to all the time but the US didn't consider it a valid course of action) and the divorce wasn't validated but he was somehow allowed to marry another woman in the same state while still legally married to the first.
 
2012-08-10 01:54:01 PM

Englebert Slaptyback: Harvey Manfrenjensenjen

Yeah, I was going to say it wouldn't be summer without MSTD. I don't get the haters.


No hate here, but no interest either. IMO the ESL/ETL/EFL schtick passed its prime in about three sentences.


I always read MSTD posts in Bjork's voice.
 
2012-08-10 01:55:01 PM

spentmiles: Burn her stuff? That's pathetic. I would've gotten her wasted drunk and then farked her all night with a Tennessee Popsicle.


Told myself, "Don't Google it. Don't Google it. Don't Google it."

*Googled it*

Ffuuuuuuuuuuuu.....
 
2012-08-10 01:55:32 PM
A Jewish mother goes to the airport to meet her daughter. The daughter steps off the plane with an eight-foot-tall Zulu warrior with a bone through his nose. The mother screams, "You fool! I said a rich doctor!"
 
2012-08-10 01:56:33 PM

meow said the dog: Listen I do not wish to judge the parties in the case of this but I try to see all issues from both sides of the coin which is the Canadian coin because the American dollar is so worthless on these days but anyway I am going on the tangent which was not meant and instead should continue to do the discussion of this issue which is the burning of the clothes when the woman went to the vacation for the marriage with the other.

One side of this says that yes you probably are the angry person who uses the woman as the status symbol and are angry when she finds someone with a penis of the actual normal size instead of little man syndrome husband who was the one she was married to. And through this anger of you it might make you wish to destroy the clothing and purses of this individual because you only bought these as the means of having she do the clinging to you as if you failed to use the dryer sheet when doing the clothes drying of you. And when she no longer does the intense cleaning then you have the freakage. So from this perspective burn away insecure man.

The other side of this says it is hard to blame the woman for doing this. No one wishes to be married to the arsonist. Except the fire chief because this would guarantee a future justification for the existence of the job of this individual.


lol.

I will have some of what you are on, thank you.
 
2012-08-10 01:56:54 PM

Harvey Manfrenjensenjen: stevarooni: Holy cow, look at all the new Farkers! Well, this is meow said the dog. Reading those posts is a treat, an adventure. It's like LSD without having to actually lick paper!

Yeah, I was going to say it wouldn't be summer without MSTD. I don't get the haters.


no hate here. i just couldn't believe i was reading something that was akin to the Hinglish I hear everyday. All it was missing was "do one thing" "revert back to" "out of station"
 
Displayed 50 of 169 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report