Scrotastic Method: But isn't this decimal vs. rationals "discovery" not really a discovery, but merely his realizing that his "sets" observation from the first 3 minutes of the video didn't really tell us anything about infinity in the first place?Just because you can't match 1:1 with irrationals:rationals, well, so what -- there's always one more of each. This doesn't seem like math to me. It seems like broken stoner philosophy. But I'm probably missing something.Anyway, all of this seems like a new-age way to apply some "whoa man" to something that's really arbitrary. Humans invented counting...generally, we count by 1. Just because you split that up in a way (counting by thirds, for example) that makes the general method seem flawed doesn't mean you're not still arguing about arbitrary-ness. The millimeter marks on the top side of my ruler don't lessen the eighth-inch marks on the bottom side./but what do I know...English major
Want the rest of the Farking story? Try
More threads. More community. More Farking.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 17 2017 15:58:26
Runtime: 0.237 sec (236 ms)