"Help. I'm being oppressed."

The Washington Times is a daily broadsheet newspaper published in Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States. It was founded in 1982 by Unification Church (cult) founder Sun Myung Moon, and until 2010 was owned by News World Communications, an international media conglomerate associated with the church.

The political views of The Washington Times are often described as conservative.[48][49][50] The Washington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."[5]

Conservative-turned-liberal writer David Brock, who worked for the Times' sister publication Insight on the News, said in his 2002 book Blinded by the Right that the news writers at the Times were encouraged and rewarded for giving news stories a conservative slant. In his 2004 book The Republican Noise Machine, Brock wrote "the Washington Times was governed by a calculatedly unfair political bias" and that its journalistic ethics were "close to nil."[55]

In a 2008 essay published in Harper's Magazine, historian Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper-the Washington Times-published strictly for the movement's benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.

I thought the idea was to have psychologists who aren't openly any ideology.

Save that political shiat for Fark and off-hours.

Mr. Inbar and Mr. Lammers, he says, should have examined the extent of bias against liberal-leaning papers and grant proposals. If the degree of bias against liberals and conservatives is similar, maybe the data on discrimination against conservatives would not be so alarming after all.

Bingo.

Liberals are drawn to academia. Conservatives are drawn to work in the real world.

Monkeyhouse Zendo: gerrymander: Google "acting white". It's just as embarrassing as evangelical anti-evolution views -- if not more so. You don't need to be a Darwinian natural selection advocate to do sociology, but you do need math.

At this point, rejecting evolution through natural selection is pretty much on a par with rejecting gravity. Would you hire someone who believed that the law of universal gravitation was "just a theory"?

Evolution is not a law. It is a very good theory. Questioning the theory of evolution is not on par with questioning the law of gravity. You are not very good at science. At this rate with so much pressure to accept evolution without question, we will never completely understand evolution.

brianbankerus: Jesus crackers, man, you know how I know you're OLD? There hasn't been a single fast food place to say "do you want fries with that" since value meals were introduced 30 years ago. You remember 30 years ago, right? When you were also old?

Most will just ask if you'd like to make it a combo, or "would you like fries and a drink with that?"

Don't generally do fast food, but if I do it's a sandwich only. And they always want to try to force/trick/convince you to get a full "value" meal.

CPennypacker: badhatharry: Monkeyhouse Zendo: gerrymander: Google "acting white". It's just as embarrassing as evangelical anti-evolution views -- if not more so. You don't need to be a Darwinian natural selection advocate to do sociology, but you do need math.

At this point, rejecting evolution through natural selection is pretty much on a par with rejecting gravity. Would you hire someone who believed that the law of universal gravitation was "just a theory"?

Evolution is not a law. It is a very good theory. Questioning the theory of evolution is not on par with questioning the law of gravity. You are not very good at science. At this rate with so much pressure to accept evolution without question, we will never completely understand evolution.

You suck at science. The law of gravity and the theory of gravitation are different. One tells us what happens and the other tells us why. Go back to school.

We know that gravity exists. We know that natural selection exists. However, we do not know for sure that evolution by way of natural selection exists. I know that is hard to believe after years of indoctrination.