If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Right Wing Watch)   Now the far left wants to turn marriage into a freak show involving 3 men, 5 women, 2 dogs and a Bengal tiger   (rightwingwatch.org) divider line 222
    More: Interesting, Tea Party Nation, gay equality, court of public opinion, free market economy, same-sex marriages, dogs  
•       •       •

3794 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Aug 2012 at 5:36 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



222 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-08-04 10:28:20 AM
Tea Party Nation's Judson Phillips told members in an email today that their movement cannot avoid the issue of same-sex marriage, as it threatens to destroy the family, replace freedom with anarchy and "turn marriage into a freak show involving 3 men, 5 women, 2 dogs and a Bengal tiger."

He says all that like it's a bad thing.
 
2012-08-04 10:44:54 AM
Polygamy is still separately illegal and has mainly Mormon right-wingers (and few hippie commune crappers) pushing to get it legalized. Meanwhile, the dogs and Bengal tiger can't consent. False slippery slope is false.
 
2012-08-04 10:48:29 AM

PC LOAD LETTER: False slippery slope is false.


You've ruined a beautiful fantasy.
 
2012-08-04 10:49:21 AM
Notice he's keeping the chickens for himself
 
2012-08-04 10:59:52 AM
Bestiality is still legal in some red states. (Montana, North Carolina and Arkansas)

Coincidence?
 
2012-08-04 11:08:18 AM
Yes. We need people like Newt Gingrich to maintain the sanctity of marriage.
 
2012-08-04 11:14:09 AM
I only support gay marriage so that one day, hopefully, I can marry my television. And we will live happily ever after!
 
2012-08-04 11:17:55 AM

Roook: I only support gay marriage so that one day, hopefully, I can marry my television. And we will live happily ever after!


TV: teacher, mother, secret lover.
 
2012-08-04 11:22:05 AM
I have that Blu-ray.
 
2012-08-04 11:22:40 AM
I don't see how anyone can own a TV and say that marriage isn't already a freak show.
 
2012-08-04 11:45:14 AM

PC LOAD LETTER: Polygamy is still separately illegal and has mainly Mormon right-wingers (and few hippie commune crappers) pushing to get it legalized. Meanwhile, the dogs and Bengal tiger can't consent. False slippery slope is false.



I don't even understand the objection to polygamy As long as everyone is of age and capable of consenting

Those are words taken directly from the tea party nut's rant.

The arguments I usually hear about polygamy is how people are coerced into it and how it has been abused to force underaged girls into sexual relationships with older men.

Can't you say the same thing about monogamous heterosexual marriages?

But why is gay marriage even an issue? You can't legislate the gay away. A marriage certificate from the state is just a goddammed piece of paper - except for the legal consequences. If one believes in god they will probably get married in a church. If a church believes that homosexuality is a sin, then they should be free to not host gay marriages. Their "God" won't recognize gay marriages anyway so why is this even important?

This whole issue distracts from things that really matter.
 
2012-08-04 11:55:14 AM
Tea Party Nation's Judson Phillips. . .

No thanks.

Still surprises me that people willingly listen to or care about what this bigot has to say.
 
2012-08-04 01:45:40 PM
Someone sounds...butthurt.
 
2012-08-04 01:49:13 PM
Traditional marriage is already a freak show. Haven't these wingnuts ever seen Bridezillas?
 
2012-08-04 02:14:57 PM

Happy Hours: PC LOAD LETTER: Polygamy is still separately illegal and has mainly Mormon right-wingers (and few hippie commune crappers) pushing to get it legalized. Meanwhile, the dogs and Bengal tiger can't consent. False slippery slope is false.


I don't even understand the objection to polygamy As long as everyone is of age and capable of consenting

Those are words taken directly from the tea party nut's rant.

The arguments I usually hear about polygamy is how people are coerced into it and how it has been abused to force underaged girls into sexual relationships with older men.

Can't you say the same thing about monogamous heterosexual marriages?

But why is gay marriage even an issue? You can't legislate the gay away. A marriage certificate from the state is just a goddammed piece of paper - except for the legal consequences. If one believes in god they will probably get married in a church. If a church believes that homosexuality is a sin, then they should be free to not host gay marriages. Their "God" won't recognize gay marriages anyway so why is this even important?

This whole issue distracts from things that really matter.


^^^^
THIS
 
2012-08-04 02:26:55 PM
So frikken what if three men or three women want to get married? (Or some mix of the two.) Those that want to are probably already living together.
 
2012-08-04 02:32:02 PM
Kinky Kinky :-)
 
2012-08-04 02:33:01 PM
Reposted for relevance...

Top Ten Reasons to Make Gay Marriage Illegal

01) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.

03) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

04) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all like many of the principles on which this great country was founded; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.

05) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of marriages like Britney Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.

06) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.

07) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.

08) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.

09) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans.
 
2012-08-04 02:37:04 PM
FTFA: The traditional family, and the left hates that expression, is the most stable unit in America

"Free market" capitalism is probably the greatest threat American family units of all kinds have ever faced. If I can hire and fire at will all the components that marriage brings: sex, food, shelter, companionship---why should anyone get or stay married through all the inconvenient hard parts?
 
2012-08-04 02:52:45 PM
"Things are never as they really are."
-Actually, that is the definition of reality.

"Now the far left wants to turn marriage into a freak show involving 3 men, 5 women, 2 dogs and a Bengal tiger. "
-I know that the Right is filled with repressed perverts, but this is too far. The liberals need to rise up and prevent the tea party from marrying dogs and tigers.

"The truth is, we implemented the programs the left wanted and this is the result."
-UM. NO. Pretty certain that the RIGHT was behind the criminalization of drugs and putting all the black men into prison.

"Traditionally marriage has worked well in America for centuries. "
- So they plan on banning divorce right? Right?? DOMA included banning all divorces, right?? Because the BEST way to protect marriage, would be to ban divorce.


I really dont understand these teahadists. Other than repressed balls of hate.
When are they going to ban the catholics, jews, muslims and mormons??
 
2012-08-04 02:56:42 PM

PC LOAD LETTER: Polygamy is still separately illegal and has mainly Mormon right-wingers (and few hippie commune crappers) pushing to get it legalized. Meanwhile, the dogs and Bengal tiger can't consent. False slippery slope is false.


But it is legal for muslims to marry multiple women, right? Freedom of religion bans the US from prohibiting most, if not all religious rights. How would a US ban on multiple muslim wives NOT be unconstitutional???

LOL
Would be funny if muslims led the way to fix the retarded marriage crap in the US.

1) no deductions for children
2) no extra tax benefits for being married


/LOL
 
2012-08-04 03:01:26 PM

Bloody William: I have that Blu-ray.


3D??
 
2012-08-04 03:12:52 PM

namatad: Bloody William: I have that Blu-ray.

3D??


I think one was a B
 
2012-08-04 03:15:02 PM
"The State's interests in support of marriage would be undermined if marriage were so malleable in meaning as to include any consensual relationship claimed to be 'exclusive and permanent.' ... Marriage redefined to mean any 'permanent' intimate personal relationship between two consenting persons has no firmer basis than a similar relationship between three or more persons, which has been long rejected." ~ Washington Supreme Court, Andersen v. King County 138 P.3d 963 (2006)
 
2012-08-04 04:03:14 PM

BunkyBrewman: Bestiality is still legal in some red states. (Montana, North Carolina and Arkansas)

Coincidence?


I know

I live in Arkansas

I used to live in the country

I've seen more things than any man should ever have to see

And one thing involving a female

But seriously, if you fuq a cow

You should marry it
 
2012-08-04 04:31:13 PM

SkinnyHead: "The State's interests in support of marriage would be undermined if marriage were so malleable in meaning as to include any consensual relationship claimed to be 'exclusive and permanent.' ... Marriage redefined to mean any 'permanent' intimate personal relationship between two consenting persons has no firmer basis than a similar relationship between three or more persons, which has been long rejected." ~ Washington Supreme Court, Andersen v. King County 138 P.3d 963 (2006)


Well by God, that settles that. Somebody get the lights, k?
 
2012-08-04 04:32:51 PM
"Now"? But I was informed by very trustworthy sources that this was their insidious plan all along.
 
2012-08-04 04:48:37 PM

PC LOAD LETTER: False slippery slope is false.


Yeah. It's like that time that Vietnam fell to the Commies, and then we all ended up Communist. Oh, wait, that was a load of conservative BS, too.
 
2012-08-04 05:19:16 PM
That is frighteningly specific.
 
2012-08-04 05:19:23 PM
who the hell is judson philips? Is that the chick who got bariatric surgery and became semi-hot?
 
2012-08-04 05:20:23 PM
I'm going to need pics of the tiger before I know how to feel about this.
 
2012-08-04 05:27:21 PM
photos.lasvegassun.com
 
2012-08-04 05:28:00 PM

SkinnyHead: "The State's interests in support of marriage would be undermined if marriage were so malleable in meaning as to include any consensual relationship claimed to be 'exclusive and permanent.' ... Marriage redefined to mean any 'permanent' intimate personal relationship between two consenting persons has no firmer basis than a similar relationship between three or more persons, which has been long rejected." ~ Washington Supreme Court, Andersen v. King County 138 P.3d 963 (2006)


I really know better, but...
Are you married? You know, traditionally?
 
2012-08-04 05:32:50 PM
What, are they going to tax gay marriage? Why does a party centered around lowering taxes and federal power give a crap about marriage?

Not TEA Party, Fundy Anti-Gay Party
or
Fundamentalist Evangelical Anti-Abortion Republicans Party
 
2012-08-04 05:33:11 PM

sno man: SkinnyHead: "The State's interests in support of marriage would be undermined if marriage were so malleable in meaning as to include any consensual relationship claimed to be 'exclusive and permanent.' ... Marriage redefined to mean any 'permanent' intimate personal relationship between two consenting persons has no firmer basis than a similar relationship between three or more persons, which has been long rejected." ~ Washington Supreme Court, Andersen v. King County 138 P.3d 963 (2006)

I really know better, but...
Are you married? You know, traditionally?


He's TheConvincingSavant's wife.
 
2012-08-04 05:40:15 PM
i48.photobucket.com
I demand a Satantic Burial!
 
2012-08-04 05:40:53 PM
Nothing changes but now it can be all legal.
www.votepolygamy.com
 
2012-08-04 05:41:09 PM
The Tea Party sounds like a very complicated Aristocrats joke.
 
2012-08-04 05:41:33 PM
Far Left in America = Just slightly right of center.
 
2012-08-04 05:42:13 PM
Now the far left wants to turn marriage into a freak show

No, the left has no interest in turning marriage into the Tea Party.
 
2012-08-04 05:43:52 PM
Traditionally marriage Slavery has worked well in America for centuries. It has always been one man slave and one woman owner. Those who want to change this bear the burden of showing why this would be good for the nation. So far they have not.
 
2012-08-04 05:45:18 PM
I'mOKwiththis.jpg
 
2012-08-04 05:45:21 PM
I thought the Tea Party was all about taxes?
 
2012-08-04 05:47:45 PM
TFA: The left's definition of equality is to allow anyone and anything to marry.

Damn it, how did they uncover our plan?!
 
2012-08-04 05:48:04 PM
I've been expecting this. That's why I began stocking up on pet food, paper towels, show tunes, and name tags two years ago.
 
2012-08-04 05:48:54 PM

Britney Spear's Speculum: I thought the Tea Party was all about taxes?


And bi-partisan. Remember that BS?
 
2012-08-04 05:49:18 PM
I see that our friend Judson forgot to highlight the real big issue with gay marriage and what it'll lead to:

www.fugly.com
 
2012-08-04 05:49:32 PM
As long as all the involved parties are of legal age and have the ability and desire to consent I do not care what they do. So if 3 men 5 women 2 dogs and a Bengal tiger want to marry and the dogs and tiger have in some way through science or magic gained the required abilities then they can have at if or all I care.
 
2012-08-04 05:50:40 PM
also TFA: Anarchy and freedom cannot co-exist.

uhhh, know the definition of words before using them.
 
2012-08-04 05:51:31 PM
Throw in some coke and you've got a good weekend in Vegas.
 
Displayed 50 of 222 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report