If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   New York Times notes that the Obama campaign is getting increasingly desperate in its requests/demands/threats in its fund-raising   (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com) divider line 133
    More: Interesting, Obama campaign  
•       •       •

1630 clicks; posted to Politics » on 01 Aug 2012 at 1:55 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



133 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-08-01 07:32:33 PM

phreezen: you just wanted to hate on anything Republican.


How dare you accuse me of that, sir. I have never said anything bad about any Republican, ever! All I said was perhaps you were trolling because hugram posted a whole bunch of pertinent information, to which you responded with "it's all smoke and mirrors and part-time census workers." However, I proceeded to bash my head against the hardest thing I could find, and now I agree with you.

In fact, your brilliant debate tactics motivated me to yell at some liberals at their "universities" for their idiotic fact-based analyses, and you know what? They threw this smokey-mirrory thing at me, and I need your help:

ei.marketwatch.com

Obviously, I tried telling them that CBO just meant "Callously Building Obamanomics" but they won't believe me, so help me out here: how should I deny this fact-based lie?
 
2012-08-01 07:50:33 PM

Lando Lincoln: phreezen: How did Bush manage to get his agenda through and Obama can't? Quit blaming Republicans for Obama's failure. So 4 more years of blaming Republicans is what you are voting for?

Bush managed to do it because the Democrats in Congress are spineless weenies. Are you new to this country?

I'm voting for getting rid of all members of the GOP so we can actually get some more useful stuff done.

You keep voting Republican. That's working out so well for us.


Bush also had a Republican controlled House and Senate for six years that became known as "The rubber stamp Congress" lead by Tom "The Hammer" Delay that spent about a Trillion dollars in "Emergency Spending" to keep it off the books. But hey, what does reality have to do with anything?
 
2012-08-01 07:52:32 PM
I guess Phreezen has decided to give this thread

*puts on sunglasses*

the cold shoulder.
 
2012-08-01 08:05:37 PM

nevirus: phreezen: you just wanted to hate on anything Republican.

How dare you accuse me of that, sir. I have never said anything bad about any Republican, ever! All I said was perhaps you were trolling because hugram posted a whole bunch of pertinent information, to which you responded with "it's all smoke and mirrors and part-time census workers." However, I proceeded to bash my head against the hardest thing I could find, and now I agree with you.

In fact, your brilliant debate tactics motivated me to yell at some liberals at their "universities" for their idiotic fact-based analyses, and you know what? They threw this smokey-mirrory thing at me, and I need your help:

[ei.marketwatch.com image 377x252]

Obviously, I tried telling them that CBO just meant "Callously Building Obamanomics" but they won't believe me, so help me out here: how should I deny this fact-based lie?


Rex Nutting?? Are you serious? OK...

blog.american.com
 
2012-08-01 08:28:52 PM

MFL: MFL: I'm just here to educate

Isitoveryet and failing miserably

Maybe I should try a shock collar. It worked with my dog.


Can you find one in your size?
 
2012-08-01 08:32:14 PM
phreezen

Account created: 2012-06-29 21:02:11

Only two days old, and you've grown up so fast!

F*ck off and die, alt troll.
 
2012-08-01 08:55:12 PM

phreezen: nevirus: phreezen: you just wanted to hate on anything Republican.

How dare you accuse me of that, sir. I have never said anything bad about any Republican, ever! All I said was perhaps you were trolling because hugram posted a whole bunch of pertinent information, to which you responded with "it's all smoke and mirrors and part-time census workers." However, I proceeded to bash my head against the hardest thing I could find, and now I agree with you.

In fact, your brilliant debate tactics motivated me to yell at some liberals at their "universities" for their idiotic fact-based analyses, and you know what? They threw this smokey-mirrory thing at me, and I need your help:

[ei.marketwatch.com image 377x252]

Obviously, I tried telling them that CBO just meant "Callously Building Obamanomics" but they won't believe me, so help me out here: how should I deny this fact-based lie?

Rex Nutting?? Are you serious? OK...

[blog.american.com image 593x534]


A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.
 
2012-08-01 09:07:18 PM

phreezen: Rex Nutting?? Are you serious? OK...


Hey, listen. I don't appreciate you lying with graphs like that. It shows Clinton having the lowest spending! It should be (from lowest spending to highest): Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, Obama. It's unsourced and us Republicans believe anything anyways, so might as well make it RIGHT.

I don't trust you anymore, man. You've changed. I thought we could teabag around and tell people to vote for R-.... tell people to vote for Rom..... ....... UUUGGGHHH

Ok, ok... hold on. Tell people to vote AGAINST Obama. But if you're going to spread lies like all Republican presidents in the past 30 years spent more than the Democrats, I'm afraid I'll have to take my teabags elsewhere.
 
2012-08-01 11:13:11 PM
nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.
 
2012-08-01 11:15:18 PM

nevirus: phreezen: Rex Nutting?? Are you serious? OK...

Hey, listen. I don't appreciate you lying with graphs like that. It shows Clinton having the lowest spending! It should be (from lowest spending to highest): Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, Obama. It's unsourced and us Republicans believe anything anyways, so might as well make it RIGHT.

I don't trust you anymore, man. You've changed. I thought we could teabag around and tell people to vote for R-.... tell people to vote for Rom..... ....... UUUGGGHHH

Ok, ok... hold on. Tell people to vote AGAINST Obama. But if you're going to spread lies like all Republican presidents in the past 30 years spent more than the Democrats, I'm afraid I'll have to take my teabags elsewhere.


What with your ramblings? Do you even have an argument?
 
2012-08-01 11:44:51 PM

phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.


Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.
 
2012-08-01 11:55:42 PM

nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.


Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.
 
2012-08-02 12:07:08 AM
Intelligent political positioning. Obama the incumbent is marketing himself as the underdog.
 
2012-08-02 01:11:11 AM

phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.


*yawn*

Got nothing huh? Cant even back up your wild claims but yet you "people" continue to make lie based accusations as usual. So tired and bored with you bagger...... You are as predictable (and sensible) as water in an ice tray.
 
2012-08-02 01:18:14 AM

phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.


And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.
 
2012-08-02 01:20:02 AM

nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.


His time would be better spent sucking balls.
 
2012-08-02 01:46:02 AM

nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.

And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.


Are you dense? Or you can't read charts? I asked you this before. The numbers are from the original charts by Nutting adjusted for inflation.

What source have they provided? Nutting? I provided that.
 
2012-08-02 01:51:12 AM

phreezen: Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: Well, yeah. They need money. When you've got billionaires willing to dump millions on Romney (pocket change for them) that's going to happen.

As for the rest of you sucking hind tit on these guys that would buy and sell your mother just for laughs, I don't know what to do with you.

Why don't he just asked Oprah for donations?


You seem concerned.
 
2012-08-02 01:52:26 AM

phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.

And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.

Are you dense? Or you can't read charts? I asked you this before. The numbers are from the original charts by Nutting adjusted for inflation.

What source have they provided? Nutting? I provided that.


Hahahaha!
 
2012-08-02 01:56:21 AM

Sabyen91: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.

And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.

Are you dense? Or you can't read charts? I asked you this before. The numbers are from the original charts by Nutting adjusted for inflation.

What source have they provided? Nutting? I provided that.

Hahahaha!


Can you expand on that or is that it?
 
2012-08-02 01:56:38 AM

phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.

And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.

Are you dense? Or you can't read charts? I asked you this before. The numbers are from the original charts by Nutting adjusted for inflation.

What source have they provided? Nutting? I provided that.


I don't know where the hell you got that graph but Nutting says just the opposite of what you are claiming. Link

/You are a troll
 
2012-08-02 01:57:13 AM

phreezen: Sabyen91: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude: phreezen: nyseattitude:

A far right wing chart with zero metrics or cited sources to identify claims and projection all the way to 2013 to top it off. Very impressive.............or not.

You smell like Danielpoon for some reason.

Right wing charts?

Can you read charts? The chart he posted goes to 10-13' also.

Indeed, I can. I can see and verify that his charts are backed by factual information from reputible sources. I can also see that your charts are manufactured with zero cited sources, lack any credibility and come from Right Wing propaganda sources.

Your time would be better spent on some birther site where factual information, reality and credibility don't matter so much and all the mouth breathers simply agree with you for being the repulsive, disengenuious partisan hack that you are. Fox, Freep Nation, Teabaggers and the dead coke head site will welcome you with open arms.

Funny, it doesn't seem you can read it. Considering your fuss about going to 2013.

Verify with whom? Nutting? That his interpretation and manipulation.

It's hilarious how you called me a partisan hack in your angry rant.

And for the record, you still have yet to provide any source for your claims while the people you attack have provided several sources, including the cbo, to their claims. You should invest in a larger pitchfork to help build your strawmen.

Are you dense? Or you can't read charts? I asked you this before. The numbers are from the original charts by Nutting adjusted for inflation.

What source have they provided? Nutting? I provided that.

Hahahaha!

Can you expand on that or is that it?


Just did.
 
2012-08-02 01:58:05 AM
ei.marketwatch.com
 
2012-08-02 02:01:47 AM

phreezen: Can you expand on that or is that it?


Ohhhh, you were trying to argue against Rex Nutting. You didn't do a very good job with your unsourced graph.
 
2012-08-02 02:05:12 AM

Sabyen91:

I don't know where the hell you got that graph but Nutting says just the opposite of what you are claiming. Link

/You are a troll


Yes, I was replying to Nutting's graph whom your buddies called me a partisan hack and other names. Said my charts are right wing or something like that...Funny isn't it. Notice that asterisk by Bush for the 06'-09 where Nutting re-assign the stimulus to Bush when Obama signed it.
 
2012-08-02 02:07:07 AM

Sabyen91: phreezen: Can you expand on that or is that it?

Ohhhh, you were trying to argue against Rex Nutting. You didn't do a very good job with your unsourced graph.


Unsourced? It's the same numbers Nutting used except it has be adjusted for inflation.
 
2012-08-02 02:08:07 AM

phreezen: Sabyen91: phreezen: Can you expand on that or is that it?

Ohhhh, you were trying to argue against Rex Nutting. You didn't do a very good job with your unsourced graph.

Unsourced? It's the same numbers Nutting used except it has be adjusted for inflation.


It is a graph that has no source. Thus...unsourced. Citation please.
 
2012-08-02 02:15:37 AM

Sabyen91: phreezen: Sabyen91: phreezen: Can you expand on that or is that it?

Ohhhh, you were trying to argue against Rex Nutting. You didn't do a very good job with your unsourced graph.

Unsourced? It's the same numbers Nutting used except it has be adjusted for inflation.

It is a graph that has no source. Thus...unsourced. Citation please.


Seriously? The source is from Nutting's graph. That's the source.
 
2012-08-02 02:25:00 AM

phreezen: Sabyen91: phreezen: Sabyen91: phreezen: Can you expand on that or is that it?

Ohhhh, you were trying to argue against Rex Nutting. You didn't do a very good job with your unsourced graph.

Unsourced? It's the same numbers Nutting used except it has be adjusted for inflation.

It is a graph that has no source. Thus...unsourced. Citation please.

Seriously? The source is from Nutting's graph. That's the source.


No, again, this is Nutting's graph.

ei.marketwatch.com

Where is your graph from?
 
2012-08-02 08:10:10 AM
It's almost as if selling out your base big time has a direct effect. Fark you Obama. I won't give you one more penny. Go ask some illegal immigrants for a handout.
 
2012-08-02 08:49:03 AM

Bob16: It's almost as if selling out your base big time has a direct effect. Fark you Obama. I won't give you one more penny. Go ask some illegal immigrants for a handout.


What, the ones he already deported?
 
2012-08-02 10:04:53 AM

phreezen: Unsourced? It's the same numbers Nutting used except it has be adjusted for inflation.


Can you describe in more detail how these percentages are adjusted for inflation?

I have trouble seeing how a 1.4 percent can be come a 25.3 percent just due to inflation, especially seeing as how inflation has been very well behaved over the last two decades.
 
2012-08-02 04:21:17 PM

phreezen: Eshman: phreezen: Kazan: phreezen: Johnny_Whistle: phreezen: Just look at all those who have supported him that are now distancing themselves...

...and then sprinting back to the fold once they get a gander at the alternative.

Is that why the race is so close? I hope for America that people will vote for Romney.

it's close? current polling data shows an electoral college result of 322 obama... that's "close?"

I remember they said the same thing about John Kerry having 322. How did that turned out?

The same Kerry who lost to an incumbent?

OK, tell me, is the race close or not?


I don't think it is. I think there is an illusion of being close being perpetuated by the media to drum up ratings because one-sided elections don't pay the bills. The only people who think it's close are a handful of breathless internet trolls on Fark.
 
Displayed 33 of 133 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report