Is it a photo of Ryan Lochte getting schooled by Yannick Agnel?

Pedobear to the white courtesy phone

Turn on NBC and check out the great asses on the Argentinian volleyball chicks.

So, they go from regular gymnastics to rhythmic gymnastics to prove their point? The Daily Fail living up to their name.

Women's gymnastic ogling leads to a visit from Chris Hanson.

If you're expected to smile while doing it, it isn't a sport.

Not even close, subby.

Headline is typo positive.

Watched some wome's judo last night. Silly...just very silly.

Indisputable visual evidence that the Olympics are much more enjoyable now that they have been in the past

Indisputable visual evidence that subby is an idiot.

Really? I have little interest in how skimpy or sparkly outfits are when worn by 3' tall female hobbits.

Those baggy outfits look horribly encumbering while doing flips and other shiat like it.

Ahh, thoroughly enjoying the Olympic so far. Just today alone got to see: dressage, beach volleyball, archery, swimming, and lots of boxing. Just awesome!

JorgiX: The asses on the Ukranian diving team might have been the best in the Olympics and I have watched tons of volleyball, beach volleyball, and gymnastics. Seriously.

But you aren't going to be courteous enough to post a pic?

Mr. Potatoass: [img.skysports.com image 800x600]

Not even close, subby.

Did not expect a non-Berlin moment to godwin this thread.

/or was that taken at Munich?

The women's cycling road race today was actually pretty awesome.

Wasn't Looking at his Neck: Mr. Potatoass: [img.skysports.com image 800x600]

Not even close, subby.

Did not expect a non-Berlin moment to godwin this thread.

/or was that taken at Munich?

Mexico City 1968. Bob Beamon. I was awestruck, as many were.

So . . . the Olympics have a time machine? Is that how they got to the past?

Great Scott!

Sad this has so few shots of women in tight athletic wear.

Mr. Potatoass: Mexico City 1968. Bob Beamon. I was awestruck, as many were.

You sound old.

Hey Daily Fail....skin-colored fabric on a leotard covering the upper chest (or what passes for a chest on these chicks) does not equal "strapless".

Beat me up for saying it but I still have a problem with sports that have artistic or style points. When you go there it seems that you have crossed out of athletics into something else.

dentalhilljack: Hey Daily Fail....skin-colored fabric on a leotard covering the upper chest (or what passes for a chest on these chicks) does not equal "strapless".

Quite right. Neither does skin-coloured fabric covering from neck to ankle qualify as there being a lot of skin on display.

advex101: Beat me up for saying it but I still have a problem with sports that have artistic or style points. When you go there it seems that you have crossed out of athletics into something else.

Yeah. I'm not a big fan of gymnastics, but I find it very annoying that they'll deduct points from a woman's routine because she didn't arc her back a certain way after the dismount, or because she didn't smile, or because she didn't include enough "dance components" in her balance beam or floor exercise routine. If someone has perfect form, poise, and execution why should considerations of style and presentation matter? That such concerns only seem to come up in women's events makes it even more insulting.

Heron: advex101: Beat me up for saying it but I still have a problem with sports that have artistic or style points. When you go there it seems that you have crossed out of athletics into something else.

Yeah. I'm not a big fan of gymnastics, but I find it very annoying that they'll deduct points from a woman's routine because she didn't arc her back a certain way after the dismount, or because she didn't smile, or because she didn't include enough "dance components" in her balance beam or floor exercise routine. If someone has perfect form, poise, and execution why should considerations of style and presentation matter? That such concerns only seem to come up in women's events makes it even more insulting.

You know, there is such a thing as men's gymnastics (and figure skating), which also include points for style and presentation.

puckrock2000: Heron: advex101: Beat me up for saying it but I still have a problem with sports that have artistic or style points. When you go there it seems that you have crossed out of athletics into something else.

Yeah. I'm not a big fan of gymnastics, but I find it very annoying that they'll deduct points from a woman's routine because she didn't arc her back a certain way after the dismount, or because she didn't smile, or because she didn't include enough "dance components" in her balance beam or floor exercise routine. If someone has perfect form, poise, and execution why should considerations of style and presentation matter? That such concerns only seem to come up in women's events makes it even more insulting.

You know, there is such a thing as men's gymnastics (and figure skating), which also include points for style and presentation.

Not to such an extent, though. Compare men's "Tumbling" to women's "Floor exercise". See also pommel horse vs balance beam. And when was the last time a male gymnast was deducted for not thrusting his chest out after a dismount, or for not holding his hands splayed out behind him properly, or for insufficient "vogue"ing in his routine?