Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The College Fix)   Where could someone go for a job, who resigned in disgrace due to a national sex scandal involving abusing countless boys and young men? I mean who in their right mind would consider such a person as a ...oh   (thecollegefix.com) divider line 32
    More: Obvious, Penn State, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sex scandals, security clearance  
•       •       •

37362 clicks; posted to Main » on 28 Jul 2012 at 7:05 PM (3 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-07-28 05:07:14 PM  
6 votes:

2wolves: coco ebert: This is what Green Greenwald is talking about. People with power in this country face no repercussions for their illegal acts.

I'm quite sure he'll be in civil court off and on for years.


Doesn't civil liability favor wealthier people or institutions who can afford to pay out? That's what happens with banks at least, paying fines becomes just the cost of doing business. The point is that we don't hold powerful people criminally liable for their crimes.
2012-07-28 04:11:12 PM  
6 votes:
Gotta admit, I figured it was the Catholic church.
2012-07-28 04:43:21 PM  
4 votes:
This is what Green Greenwald is talking about. People with power in this country face no repercussions for their illegal acts.
2012-07-28 07:20:16 PM  
2 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: Yes, really. I haven't seen one post saying panier is in no way responsible, morally or legally.

I don't think anyone in those threads knew or cared who this guy was. They had JoePa to hate, they were told to hate him, and that's what happened.


You really believe your delusions, huh? Get help.
2012-07-28 07:18:24 PM  
2 votes:
Managing a homoerotic armored wankball team?
2012-07-28 07:15:08 PM  
2 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: That's because no one disagrees that Spanier is a scumbag.

Really? You all seem to agree that JoePa molested kids. Doesn't stop you from talking about how evil he was 2000 times a thread. Nobody mentioned the Board until I brought it up in at least one thread. Nobody. Hell, nobody mentioned Sandusky. It was just JoePa. Who passionately hates someone and never mentions them when the discussion is about them?

Funny. That's the same tone of all the media reports those threads start on. Everyone claims to have read the report, but nobody discusses it except the parts about JoePa. It's a targeted campaign to slander the guy who is dead and can't defend himself. You all just happily go along and be manipulated.


Well, thankfully we have you, our courageous conscience, here to remind everyone how we should think, feel and act. And to think you even managed to pull it off without coming across as smug and condescending at all.
2012-07-28 06:04:34 PM  
2 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: GAT_00: Hey look, someone is directing hate to one of the people who actually did the cover up at Penn State. Let's watch the Internet suddenly get angry at them like a mob taking direciton.

They didn't defend JoePa's enabling of Sandusky, why would they defend this sumbag?

That's not the point I'm making. The Penn State anger has been very specifically directed. Go back and look at all the threads on the sanctions. Ctrl-F for Graham Spanier, or look for people who mentioned the Freeh Report.


That's because no one disagrees that Spanier is a scumbag. There's no conversation to be had. You argue with people who disagree with you. The only people who argue with people who agree with them are insane girlfriends.
2012-07-28 04:23:40 PM  
2 votes:
He knows how to keep his mouth shut.
2012-07-29 12:10:47 AM  
1 votes:

Gyrfalcon: You understand that the courts don't make any money off the litigants, right?


Well, technically, they *do* charge court fees. But practically, you're correct. Although, if there were no litigants, why would we need to employ the court system? So...they kind of depend on litigants, whether they directly profit from each of them or not.
2012-07-28 10:15:00 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: Nobody mentioned the Board until I brought it up in at least one thread. Nobody. Hell, nobody mentioned Sandusky. It was just JoePa


Sad. I was never quite sure about you before. Hyperbole aside, you clearly believe the above to some degree which is absurd...or you are a troll's troll.

\fret not, I will perform my role as a pawn and continue to ready your posts.
2012-07-28 08:58:18 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: GAT_00: vygramul: Yes, really. I haven't seen one post saying panier is in no way responsible, morally or legally.

I don't think anyone in those threads knew or cared who this guy was. They had JoePa to hate, they were told to hate him, and that's what happened.

So? If JoePa was morally clean in this fiasco, you would be completely right and would have every reason to white knight for him.

I've never said he was completely clean, and I'm merely pointing out that it seems to me that you are all allowing yourselves to be manipulated. Now, me, I hate that. I don't like being used as a pawn, and I don't like people using others to do it either.


You're seeing what you want to see.
2012-07-28 08:53:04 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: That's because no one disagrees that Spanier is a scumbag.

Really? You all seem to agree that JoePa molested kids. Doesn't stop you from talking about how evil he was 2000 times a thread. Nobody mentioned the Board until I brought it up in at least one thread. Nobody. Hell, nobody mentioned Sandusky. It was just JoePa. Who passionately hates someone and never mentions them when the discussion is about them?

Funny. That's the same tone of all the media reports those threads start on. Everyone claims to have read the report, but nobody discusses it except the parts about JoePa. It's a targeted campaign to slander the guy who is dead and can't defend himself. You all just happily go along and be manipulated.


That would be because all the threads where you come to throw these hissy fits have to do with JoePa. Try to use more of your brain and less of your emotions when it comes to this. You're smart and clever in almost every other thread I see you in, and then Penn State comes up and you froth at the mouth.
2012-07-28 08:51:47 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: Hey look, someone is directing hate to one of the people who actually did the cover up at Penn State. Let's watch the Internet suddenly get angry at them like a mob taking direciton.


Hey look, an article that's actually pertinent to the other people that we all know were involved in this scandal. Try to keep up. You're almost running on full whargarrbl at this point.
2012-07-28 08:03:10 PM  
1 votes:
2012-07-28 07:50:56 PM  
1 votes:

stirfrybry: skinink: Well, where do you recommend he gets a job, subby? Even convicts released from jail have to find work somewhere.
you sound like an ex-con.


Come on. "Skin-ink?" Of course he's a felon.
2012-07-28 07:43:35 PM  
1 votes:

St_Francis_P: Gotta admit, I figured it was the Catholic church.


Nah. The Catholics dump their pedo priests onto the TSA.

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/05/24/i-team-priest-removed-fro m -ministry-due-to-sex-abuse-allegations-works-at-phl/

www.themoralliberal.com
2012-07-28 07:38:14 PM  
1 votes:

stirfrybry: Sandelaphon: How the fark do you pass a TS investigation when your past performance was covering up pedo rape?

Government full of criminals perhaps?


DING DING DING! winner winner chicken dinner
2012-07-28 07:38:10 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: GAT_00: vygramul: Yes, really. I haven't seen one post saying panier is in no way responsible, morally or legally.

I don't think anyone in those threads knew or cared who this guy was. They had JoePa to hate, they were told to hate him, and that's what happened.

So? If JoePa was morally clean in this fiasco, you would be completely right and would have every reason to white knight for him.

I've never said he was completely clean, and I'm merely pointing out that it seems to me that you are all allowing yourselves to be manipulated. Now, me, I hate that. I don't like being used as a pawn, and I don't like people using others to do it either.


It seems to me that you are all blinded by the cult of personality Paterno accumulated for being an incredibly talented football coach. But that love is making it impossible for some people to accept that a person who was that talented and had given that much to the community could turn out to be a part of an ongoing ugliness ambivalence to the heart-wrenching suffering of children.
2012-07-28 07:31:21 PM  
1 votes:

IlGreven: cantsleep: GAT_00, just remember it is you who is turning this thread into a JoePa thread, no one else.

Meanwhile, everyone else will turn it into a "defending anyone on that side is defending pedophiles" thread.

/YOU MADE ME DEFEND RICK SANTORUM, YOU ASSHOLES!


weknowmemes.com
2012-07-28 07:27:33 PM  
1 votes:

skinink: Well, where do you recommend he gets a job, subby? Even convicts released from jail have to find work somewhere.


I humbly submit:

themurkyfringe.com
2012-07-28 07:27:05 PM  
1 votes:

2wolves: coco ebert: 2wolves: coco ebert: This is what Green Greenwald is talking about. People with power in this country face no repercussions for their illegal acts.

I'm quite sure he'll be in civil court off and on for years.

Doesn't civil liability favor wealthier people or institutions who can afford to pay out? That's what happens with banks at least, paying fines becomes just the cost of doing business. The point is that we don't hold powerful people criminally liable for their crimes.

Haven't for a long, long, time. Not a single Bankster has been indicted, let alone convicted, of screwing over most of the civilized world.


Well, maybe not in this country.
2012-07-28 07:23:11 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: vygramul: Yes, really. I haven't seen one post saying panier is in no way responsible, morally or legally.

I don't think anyone in those threads knew or cared who this guy was. They had JoePa to hate, they were told to hate him, and that's what happened.


So? If JoePa was morally clean in this fiasco, you would be completely right and would have every reason to white knight for him.
2012-07-28 07:18:58 PM  
1 votes:
GAT_00, just remember it is you who is turning this thread into a JoePa thread, no one else.
2012-07-28 07:18:16 PM  
1 votes:

skinink: Well, where do you recommend he gets a job, subby? Even convicts released from jail have to find work somewhere.


you sound like an ex-con.
2012-07-28 07:15:06 PM  
1 votes:

Sandelaphon: How the fark do you pass a TS investigation when your past performance was covering up pedo rape?


Government full of criminals perhaps?
2012-07-28 07:13:03 PM  
1 votes:
2012-07-28 07:09:23 PM  
1 votes:
How the fark do you pass a TS investigation when your past performance was covering up pedo rape?
2012-07-28 06:17:53 PM  
1 votes:

vygramul: That's because no one disagrees that Spanier is a scumbag.


Really? You all seem to agree that JoePa molested kids. Doesn't stop you from talking about how evil he was 2000 times a thread. Nobody mentioned the Board until I brought it up in at least one thread. Nobody. Hell, nobody mentioned Sandusky. It was just JoePa. Who passionately hates someone and never mentions them when the discussion is about them?

Funny. That's the same tone of all the media reports those threads start on. Everyone claims to have read the report, but nobody discusses it except the parts about JoePa. It's a targeted campaign to slander the guy who is dead and can't defend himself. You all just happily go along and be manipulated.
2012-07-28 06:01:38 PM  
1 votes:
Quoted source from the Washington Post says that he is a "contractor" on something that is "Top Secret"

hence

img1.fark.net
2012-07-28 05:54:11 PM  
1 votes:

GAT_00: Hey look, someone is directing hate to one of the people who actually did the cover up at Penn State. Let's watch the Internet suddenly get angry at them like a mob taking direciton.


They didn't defend JoePa's enabling of Sandusky, why would they defend this sumbag?
2012-07-28 04:22:14 PM  
1 votes:

St_Francis_P: Gotta admit, I figured it was the Catholic church.


He's got the sort of experience they'd value.
2012-07-28 04:18:53 PM  
1 votes:
Proof?

Oh, a college student news service.

Never mind.
 
Displayed 32 of 32 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report