If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Modern Drunkard Index)   Now you can be arrested for being drunk IN A BAR. Article includes diatribe against MADD   (moderndrunkardmagazine.com) divider line 255
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

28028 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Nov 2003 at 11:13 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



255 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2003-11-17 12:25:11 AM
Wow. Nice posters in the article. Also, nice raging paranoia. Not that there's anything wrong with that... and just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you, it just means you don't sound credible when you write articles about it.

/checks for black helicopters outside his window
 
2003-11-17 12:25:22 AM


 
2003-11-17 12:25:51 AM
MMGAMOIO - I would construe public drunkeness as just that. Being observably drunk in public. If you gotta walk a bit to get home and can do it in a calm and orderly fashion, no harm done. If you're tripping left and right and cussin' up a storm, then you're retarded and deserve to be picked up.

I think public intoxication should be defined as a level at which you prove yourself to be a hazard or a nuisance to the public at large.

i.e. staggering into the road and forcing cars to swerve to avoid hitting you, or singing loudly in a quiet neighborhood at 3:00 am. The BAC at which such behavior is likely should be the point at which P.I. should be defined.

We are supposed to make laws based on how our behavior affects other people, not because our behavior bothers other people... If I'm staggering down the sidewalk, and someone just thinks I'm acting "retarded" and it merely bothers them, they should get stuffed.

If my behavior has crossed the line into actually having an affect on their own ability to conduct their lives, then I should get stuffed.

Subsequently, the standard for police intervention (a stop) should reflect that. I need to be making a nuisance or a hazard of myself before the police should be allowed to interfere with me... not just taking a teeter-totter stroll back to my house.
 
2003-11-17 12:26:09 AM
Too bad, I was going to suggest they use Michael Jackson from now on to endorse beer.

"See what happens when you drink, kids?"

"Jesus God Noooo!"
 
2003-11-17 12:28:53 AM
I would share in the righteous indignation, but I can't do it very effectively since I don't drink at all.

Well, I did consume a few wine coolers a few months ago. But I was using them as a sleep-aid in my own home. Also, I drink Ny-Quil (or generic equivalent when available), though again I never go out in public afterward. Still, I suppose that I should be concerned, because I would not be surprised if MADD comes after that next.
 
sib
2003-11-17 12:33:00 AM
technicolor-misfit : I agree totally.


"The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins."


--Oliver Wendell Holmes

 
2003-11-17 12:33:07 AM
Jesus farking Christ! I even support the Patriot Act, but this is just ridiculous. Just this once, I'll admit that maybe the liberals are right...arresting people for drinking in bars does reek a lot of 1984. Hopefully nobody will ever try this in Boston...hey, the cops are Irish, right? Riiight???

"What's the matter, Officer? I'm LEGALLY DRUNK!" -Carlin
 
2003-11-17 12:33:49 AM
fairfax cops are among the highest paid in the country. not much crime in fairfax either... hmm.

i got stopped at an arlington dui checkpoint recently. i was HOUSED. i got out and beat 6 pigs to the ground, then i asked who else wants some of deebo.

pussies.
 
2003-11-17 12:34:18 AM
will i lose my license for a year if i refuse to blow the officer?
 
2003-11-17 12:36:21 AM
Usually I would just make noise and complain...after reading this i decided to start my own organization, called D.A.M.A.D.D(drunks against mothers against drunk driving)

see, my organization will be perfect for all members, we can raise money no matter what the outcome, have jobs forever, and in the whole process...never create anything, build anything, or help anything, here is how it will work.

1)We raise money.

2)we spout off a bunch of goals.

3) if we fail at our goals, we say "we dont have enough cash to fulfill them.

4)if by some fluke we DO achieve our goals,or our goals just sorta get met(by chance, the economy, etc) we say "we have done so much, now we need more cash for MORE goals"

5)PROFIT and jobs for our friends forever!!!!!

-/yay for scams labeled as Non-Profit
 
2003-11-17 12:36:52 AM
Damn...don't you love how religious conservatives have to try and ruin everything?

Anyway, if you think drinkers have a hard time, how about stoners? We don't have a billion dollar industry trying to protect us, the propoganda about weed is far worse than the propoganda against alcohol, and the cops respect the rights of pot smokers far less than they respect drinkers. Also, unlike drinkers, pot smokers can have their property confiscated without any sort of due process-far worse than spending the night in the drunk tank.
 
2003-11-17 12:37:12 AM
Sure thing sib, I'm at the university of Guelph. Try and make it here on a thursday, that's when the bars are packed.
 
2003-11-17 12:37:58 AM
I have a simple formula for not getting a DUI: if you have more than a beer, you don't drive. Simple. I don't care how much anyone rips on me, it's responsibility and it's high time everyone farking learned about it. If you know you're driving home and you can't be content with a beer, or at least stop yourself from drinking heavily, perhaps that indicates a problem.

You get a DUI, I probably won't feel any sympathy for you. And if you're one of those idiots who feel alcohol doesn't affect your driving ability, then you're a Darwin Award waiting to happen, and I hope you don't take any innocents with you.

Responsibility, people. Watch out for yourself and your friends, and you won't have this problem. I know that's a stretch in this country...

(/)rant over
 
2003-11-17 12:41:26 AM
I work in the industry.

I bounce on the weekends.

I've tossed folks out for being drunk and disorderly--and I've then gone to my bartender and written them up for letting one our patrons get in that condition.

I've fired bartenders for this sort of thing as well.

I regularly toss folks for bringing in their own alcohol, which you have to do, because you have no control then on how much your patrons are drinking.

Despite this incident happening a year ago, I have to say WTF?

I love to see folks having a good time, and me and my staff try like hell to keep the party going, and that means watching out for them at times, and watching out for their friends, so they don't have to worry about it. I give out lots of free stuff to designated drivers, because those folks are making sure that my patrons get home safe, and there's no sense in making them feel excluded, they should be rewarded for taking the responsibility. You run a bar, you run a fine line in getting folks to up the tab, while making sure that you don't have folks in a state that they are going to hurt themselves, or others. You sometimes have to be the final arbiter, and when a bartender shuts you off, you might want to step back off the tirade machine, and examine what has led that bartender to take the action. Now, I know that not all club owners, and bar owners take the high road--they'll get folks as loaded as they can, take the cash, and hope like hell they don't wrap themselves around a tree, or smash head on into a car load of kids--but there IS a lot of incentive to take the high road--not just in the ethical responsibility that you have when you serve liquor, and in the hospitality business, there is a bit--but a very real financial incentive as well. Lawsuits are expensive. Insurers will cut you off at the knees, and communities will yank that liquor license faster than you can blink if they think that you're NOT taking care of folks. It keeps a lot of folks cleaner than they would normally operate.

If there is a problem on the floor, and it's because someone is drunk and out of control, I take care of the problem, or my staff does, and then we figure out WTF happened. Who dropped the ball--guy or gal behind the bar? Guys or gals on the floor who are supposed to be watching folks to see if they're getting drinks from friends, their bringing in bootleg hootch, or they're popping pills and drinks at the same time. Folks get out of control in a club--that's OUR fault, because we dropped the ball. We want you to have a good time, it's why we're there. We want to be a part of that good time, and lord knows we like to party--just check out your bartender friends' parties--BUT we also want you to come back. You're puking in the toilet or in the alley, that's not fun. You're weaving and out of control, someone is going to regulate, and that's not fun either. I can get fired up when a guy takes a swing or two, but in the end, I know if there's something brewing: we screwed up.

We didn't watch the floor, we dropped the ball, and then we have to deal with it. We can't let folks swing wild, and we have to step in to keep folks from hurting each other, and I know that I get riled if a guy is being ejected for his behavior, or a gal too--let's not forget the ladies in the audience--and there is shennigans going on because they're liquored up, we screwed up. It would be nice if folks realized that they were putting other folks at risk, and just stepped out quietly. It would be nice if folks didn't try to sneak liquor INTO a club too, and didn't pelt my bouncers with peanuts distracting them from watching out for the predatory sumbiatches who try to slip crap into gals' drinks. It would be nice if we didn't have to do all that, could just have a nice quiet night, where everyone came in, danced, had a few drinks, a few laughs, and everyone went off with a mild buzz and happy thoughts. It DOES happen most nights, but not often enough that we send our bouncers off for a night.

And that's why we have those folks on the floor. And that is WHY this particular community action has me puzzled. It shows a marked lack of respect for the patrons, and it is targeting the wrong folks. You want to bust down on folks, I hate to say it, because it draws fire on me and mine, but you have to direct that ire and that focus on the folks who control the drink supply--the clubs and the bars. You find folks who are drunk and disorderly, you regulate on the folks who are about to do someone some harm, yes, and THEN you go after the irresponsible sumbiatches who enabled them to get that way.

Singing kareoke isn't a crime. (OK, maybe sometimes, but isn't there a piece of you that just dies a little inside sometime the first time you see some fresh faced little scrub who want's to sing to his girlfriend with some cheeserock song?) Having a few drinks with your friends, in an atmosphere of conviviality, in a controlled environment in club, where folks are being watched out over is part of the hospitality business. It's what we do. Yes, we expect to be regulated, we expect to be held accountable, and this sort of sweep is bit troublesome, because it denies the club even of showing any kind of responsibility--I've taken keys, I've called cabs, I've driven folks home myself, and I've certainly helped folks who made a mistake in their estimation of their own tolerance, and I've shut folks off, or at least slowed them down if I think they're edging over the precipice of control. I do my damndest to make sure my patrons are having a good time, and are going to go home safe, and it's spooky from this end of the business to see the police taking that control from my, or my fellows' hands. It shows a marked lack of trust, and it shows a disturbing thread of misplaced prevention. That's a police department that is telling the club owners that they don't think they're doing their job--and maybe this place wasn't, but you take it to the owner, not haul out a patron, who isn't near a car yet. It supposes guilt before the fact.

They see a fella weaving, getting ready to get into his car--you've got probable cause. Go to town. Then find the owner of the club that let that poor bastard out with keys in his hands, and string him up too. It's harsh, but it will certainly help club owners and bar owners learn their lesson that you can't let get into that condition. You're job at a club is give folks a place to party, safely. You fail in that, and let folks go out drunk as Templers, then you NEED to be held accountable. But to premeptively do so? This is a sign of community with a troubled police force--and that is often a sign of a city government that has some serious problems about their role in the community.

I work hard to work with the police in my community. I work damn hard to have a good relationship with them, and that makes things easier on me and mine, and on them too. There are a lot of club owners and managers that do the same. This is a slab in the face of those folks who do work hard to run good clubs and good bars. It also makes me not want to open up a club, and fork over good tax money to this community. Feh.
 
2003-11-17 12:43:50 AM
hubiestubert
Yeah...what he said
 
2003-11-17 12:44:40 AM
" If you're tripping left and right and cussin' up a storm, then you're retarded and deserve to be picked up."

Wheeeew. Thank god no cops stopped me that one night. I'd had like, a pint of whiskey, several beers, all on an empty stomach and a scrawny ass frame.

I'd drank so much (it's alot for me. I drink maybe once ever three weeks and have a light body weight.) because I knew I was stupid to be going to the party I went to. Emotional masochism at it's best.

But, this is total bullshiat. I know I can't wait till the next two weeks pass. I'm 21 on Dec. 1. We all know how effective Prohibition was- a rise in black-market dealings, a rise in organized crime, etc. And these dumb biatches want to bring that BACK?!

.david
 
2003-11-17 12:45:05 AM
Kinda quiet in here.



Ashcroft................Bush................Clinton!

There....that should do it.

/gets marshmallows ready
 
2003-11-17 12:47:30 AM
so why we reading this year old article anyway?
 
FNG [TotalFark]
2003-11-17 12:47:49 AM
AsianMan:
1. this happened almost one year ago
2. the police were pretty much roundly criticized for their actions
3. it never happened again

Really don't see why this is that big a deal right now


yes, being from nova, I knew this was from almost a year ago, and happened here, when I read the headline. I was just as disbelieving as everyone else in the area at the time, and yes, everyone was like "wtf?!". it never did happen again. it was a stupid move, and of the politics that prompted this action we'll probably never really know.

drinking and driving should land you in jail. period. it's stupid; it's not just your life you're taking into your hands, it's innocents, and their families. as far as I am concerned, if you're dumb enough and selfish enough to drink and drive, just get it over with and kill yourself at home. you'll be doing us all a favor.

however, MADD really has gotten out of control. the police around here really took a beating for this. who knows if this was done just to secure a generous donation? maybe one of the cops with a bit of authority knew his ex hung out there after dumping him? it was a load of crap, and this is ancient history in D.C.
 
2003-11-17 12:51:37 AM
As somebody that lives just the other side of the Potomac in MD, if I was one of the people taken out of that bar by the cops, I'd sue the living sh't out of the county for false arrest. Especially since they'd probably settle for a few thousand, since Fairfax has got majorly deep pockets.
And for those of you not in the know: NOVA (what we in the DC Metro area call Northern Virginia, which Fairfax is a part of) is pretty far from "the South." Most Marylanders and people from NoVA will vehemently deny they are "Southerners" simply because we are South of the Mason-Dixon.
Didn't Fark run a link a month or so ago saying that it was no longer an arrestable offense to tell a cop to go f'ck himself? Probably what I'd do in the situation...
 
2003-11-17 12:54:10 AM
technicolor-misfit
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my original post. The times I've stumbled home from a variety of places I've always been with other people who have relayed the information back to me that I was loud and unruly. So I commonly associate stumbling with loudness just based on personal experience. It's the noise that I feel in most places should be the major indicator, not so much the walk
 
sib
2003-11-17 12:54:46 AM
Holy shiat hubiestubert: I'll be money you worked at the World Way II club in NoHo. Never been tossed out of there (thanks).
 
2003-11-17 12:56:01 AM
On the breathalyzer test, i'll give my take.
When first pulled over, legally you do not have to submit to a field sobriety test. As a matter of fact you don't have to say anything. As many have stated, all it is is more evidence to use against you. When you are taken to the police station, then you have to decide on a breathalyzer {assuming it wasn't a roadside checkpoint}. I was also told you are to have 20 minutes to contact legal counsel before submitting a breath test.
Check local laws. Your mileage may vary.
/been there, done that...
 
2003-11-17 12:56:42 AM
Actually, if you end up on probation, they will attempt to prevent you from going to a bar. That's the deal.
 
2003-11-17 12:57:01 AM
Another fine american yanks their head outta their ass long enough to say (through what is sarcasm I'm sure):

"Jesus farking Christ! I even support the Patriot Act, but this is just ridiculous. Just this once, I'll admit that maybe the liberals are right...arresting people for drinking in bars does reek a lot of 1984. Hopefully nobody will ever try this in Boston...hey, the cops are Irish, right? Riiight???"

Translates easily to: Hey, I'm no __Place racial or theological group here___ so I am unconcered by anything our great leader has done up until now. However, as soon as they start to take a look at using their newly expanded abilities to affect my life, well, that is unacceptable. And, as we all know, the Irish are drunks and thus I will never fall victim to the mostly Irish cops in Boston. Am I correct?

No Hits, just wanted to make that a clear statement.
 
2003-11-17 12:59:20 AM
This is what we call a "Pre-emptive Strike" on drunk driving and other alcohol related crimes. *cough* Iraq... Also what we have here is enforcing special interest morals on a group of people. What do you know, sounds just like "pro-life" arguments. It could save lives by keeping these people off the streets!!
 
2003-11-17 01:03:20 AM
sib--Nope, but I toss back suds there fairly often. Cheap beer, and a good crowd. It's the secret lair of a lot of the NoHo rock stars--that and the Eagle's Lodge now that folks have figured out that a $20 membership can get you performance space for another $20 bucks a night. Between the Eagle's and Harry's, you've got a scene starting to creep back.
 
2003-11-17 01:03:56 AM
At least State Troopers tend to be a little more trusting. And god knows Park Police can be dense... a few years ago in college, a bunch of us (maybe 20+) got loaded and drove (with a DD, we weren't morons) a few miles down the road to Pt. Lookout, MD, where there was a huge Union prison camp for Confederate prisoners of war. We went on Halloween to go "ghost-hunting."
Anyways, we split up, one group led by me, who went walking along the beach, and my roommate, who was wandering around with a group in the woods with a video camera. He also had a backpack on with a full case of beer (along w/ vodka bottles, rum, etc.), and had already had about 8 beers himself before getting down there. Our group got chased by the cops (who were busting people left and right that night), but we lost them in the woods, and when they finally tracked us down, we were walking back to our cars, mostly sober, and just played dumb that we'd just gotten here, had walked 2 minutes up the road, and were heading home. Oh, we can't be in the park after sunset officer? Oh damn, missed the sign on the way in, sorry about that, we're on our way out anyways.
Next morning my roommate gets ahold of our friend with the video camera who was along with his group... within 15 minutes of being there, my roommate (who had consumed about 4 more beers for a grand total of 12) had been stopped by about 4 park police, and was being questioned. The guy with the camera kept it rolling, but kept it down so the cops couldn't see. Of course, being blasted off his rear, he was slurring like he was missing most of his tongue, and often was giving WAY too much info to the cops. What was also funny was the people in the group who were trying to whisper "STFU!" to him every 30 seconds. And amazingly, they let him (and the group) go.
Moral of the story... when you get arrested at your bar, go to your local national park. The park police are usually so shocked at having to actually admonish you for doing something illegal they forget to arrest you.
 
2003-11-17 01:04:48 AM
If I were a bar owner I would be buying a bus and hiring a driver. Like democrats on voting day.

Load up the van!

You smell that? Is that my finger?

~ Pinky ~

.
 
2003-11-17 01:05:20 AM
Wow, America is one farked up country! Problem is, thanks to our conservative government here in Australia, we are becoming more like it day by day.
 
2003-11-17 01:06:07 AM
Hmm, I like how you can "Preview before post" but the preview does not show the filters put onto the words... ha
 
2003-11-17 01:07:27 AM
this really pissed me off when it happened... a year ago.

/yawn
 
2003-11-17 01:16:39 AM
Damn. These people really like drinking.
 
2003-11-17 01:20:44 AM
Wow, the article DID fly! And it was all thanks to TOR, CONQUEROR OF THE COSMOS!
 
2003-11-17 01:22:37 AM
Damn. These people really like drinking.
 
2003-11-17 01:23:42 AM
Yeah - let 'em try that at the local VFW. Tell a vet he's had one too many while sitting at the bar.

Dumb question:
What if the bar owners just start making their places 'private clubs'? Could they then be charged with 'public' intoxication?

Off topic, but, they do it in SC to get around bluelaws preventing Alcohol sales on Sunday. It's so funny to walk into a place and having these conversations.

Bartender: Er, are you a member?
Me: No. How much to join?
Bartender: It's free. But if you sign up, you can't drink until tomorrow.
OR
Bartender: Ok, I'll just sign you in as a guest.
 
2003-11-17 01:23:45 AM


This one really made me think...specifically of naming my band the Good Things Association. (1. So I can say people who hate my music hate good things 2. It's an easy to remember acronym)

Yeah, I'm stoned. Big deal.
 
sib
2003-11-17 01:24:46 AM
All right hubiestubert: checks in the mail. I miss the WWII club though (in boston now). Cheapest drinks ever, and the only bar I've ever seen with a periscope.
 
2003-11-17 01:25:48 AM
WombatJoe:
They did this every Tuesday and Thursday night for 4 weeks.
In all likelihood it would have stopped if you'd paid them off. In Chicago, at least, this kind of behavior is very common when a new business starts up, or if new owners refuse to continue the previous arrangement.


State_College_Arsonist:
I have a simple formula for not getting a DUI: if you have more than a beer, you don't drive.
So if you drink 2 beers over a period of 30 minutes, then are in the bar for another 6 hours, you can't drive home? That sounds insane to me.


Always refuse to blow. The machines are usually poorly calibrated and can false even if you haven't had a single alcoholic drink (it can false on other consumables). Any lawyer worth his salt can get rid of the automatic suspension at the conclusion of a successful court case.
 
2003-11-17 01:26:15 AM
Wow. Well said, Hubie. Gives me hope for people in the world.
 
2003-11-17 01:27:01 AM
why drive drunk when you can fly HIGH?

/rips bong
 
2003-11-17 01:35:11 AM
Monkeyboy: Yeah, maybe it is. But I meant that for the farkers among us who pound down four or five drinks an hour for an hour or two, not the guys who actually spend that much time in a bar. Seriously, how many of us spend 6 hours in a bar?

In any event, which one of us is more likely to get a DUI? Is it really worth it? I don't think so, so I'll stick to what I'm doing. Besides, for my group of friends, DD gets a free dinner and snacks. Cheaper than blowing $50 on drinks, eh?

As for not blowing, I've been told that if you refuse to blow, you get taken to the local hospital where they take your blood after a quickie court order (as far as Pennsylvania is concerned). And blood tests are probably harder to get thrown out in court...Anyone have a definite answer on that?
 
2003-11-17 01:37:03 AM
Droogmilk: Freakiest. Picture. Ever

Freaks me out like "Him" on the Powerpuff girls. (shudder)
 
2003-11-17 01:37:14 AM
F_ck it, people.

You know this isn't about tobacco, booze, or morality tax. This is about the abuse of power. The "I'll do it because I can" mentality. No one is looking out for your rights anymore...They are all scared. Law enforcement has a Homeand Security Umbrella now, and all the the raining complaints and protests bounce right off, unfelt. You can all joke, and laugh, and tell me to go to Oprah, but you know its happening. Just one more terror attack, one more 9-11, and we'll all be huddled under the sheets, hoping those goose steps are't picking our door today. Don't let this happen. Rebel. Fight back. Scream riots for your freedom and read the back of the New Hamshire State Quarter.
 
2003-11-17 01:39:35 AM
As for not blowing, I've been told that if you refuse to blow, you get taken to the local hospital where they take your blood after a quickie court order (as far as Pennsylvania is concerned). And blood tests are probably harder to get thrown out in court...Anyone have a definite answer on that?

i think you answered it with the "at least in PA" part. i think thats part of local and/or state laws (as are all dui laws, for that matter)

in louisiana, blood cannot be drawn without your consent. HOWEVER, if you pass out, or if you are knocked unconscious in an accident, they can take as much blood as they want.

moral: don't drink and drive....and if you get ripped, don't drive home
 
2003-11-17 01:42:16 AM
I think the biggest issue at hand is...why the hell was this guy in a Santa suit!!! I mean, are Americans so worthless that we need 3 months of Christmas???
 
2003-11-17 01:44:56 AM
o5iiawah
RTFA moron.
 
2003-11-17 01:46:49 AM
I like DAM better:

DAM - Mothers Against Dyslexia
 
2003-11-17 01:52:50 AM
hubiestubert:
Is your real name Mike Callahan?


If you don't get the reference, it's a HUGE compliment.... look up Spider Robinson on Amazon.com.
 
2003-11-17 01:59:01 AM
first the hippies decided we couldnt smoke in bars - so, no drinking, no dancing and no talking seem like a logical next step. just stand there, wring your hands and worry about the god-damned children.
 
Displayed 50 of 255 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report