If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Bloomberg)   Economists agree on most major macroeconomic issues - it's politics that makes it appear otherwise   (bloomberg.com) divider line 101
    More: Obvious, U.S., Ramesh Ponnuru, Arthur Laffer, mainstream economists, Jeffrey Goldberg, economics  
•       •       •

1678 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Jul 2012 at 11:14 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

101 Comments   (+0 »)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
2012-07-25 04:59:04 AM

BigJake: fusillade762: I don't see it on there...

it's a hybrid of applied psychology and math

economists think it's more of the latter when it's actually more of the former

Reading the comments on the questions from the IGM experts forum, it's interesting to see how these economists, all very prestigious, think in different ways.

For example, ask the question, "will the current such-and-such be bad for the economy," you might get different types of answers:

1. "I couldn't accurately quantitize 'will', 'such-and-such', 'bad', or 'economy' in my chalkboard-filling math equation, so the solution remains indeterminate."
2. "Most of the data collected suggests it is bad, so it's probably bad."
3. "Of course it's bad! It's a fundamental rule that it's always bad when such-and-such takes place!"
Displayed 1 of 101 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »