If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Not News: Man faces 60 days in jail. Fark: For hosting Bible study in his own home   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 397
    More: Asinine, Bibles, building codes, 3TV, seminaries, Bible study, jail term, Courts of Arizona  
•       •       •

14881 clicks; posted to Main » on 07 Jul 2012 at 12:34 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



397 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-07-07 03:19:13 PM
the ha ha guy: Here's an even more in-depth (but long) article that speaks volumes about this guy's true motives:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-17/news/michael-salman-wants- to -build-a-church-in-his-backyard-his-neighbors-aren-t-buying-it/

"In July 1992, hoping to scare the hell out of a kid who'd been messing with his girlfriend's little brother, police reports say, Salman donned a Raiders T-shirt and fired five rounds from a .38 special into the kid's house. The boy's mother was home at the time; she told police that one of the bullets nearly grazed her hairline."

"In 1994, Salman had filed paperwork claiming that he belonged to the Embassy of God. That meant, the document claimed, that he didn't need to follow United States law."

"[In 2002,]The Church of All Nations hired him to be its pastor. [...] According to a lawsuit the church's leadership filed against Salman, one of the new pastor's first moves was to put up a sign saying "Harvest Christian Fellowship." That wasn't what they'd bargained for: They were the Church of All Nations, and proud of it. [...] They voted to oust him, and when he fought back and refused to leave, they filed a "forcible detainer" to have him evicted. The judge granted it."

"The city may have to pay for our church to be built," Michael Salman says. The excitement in his voice is unmistakable."


O FFS...
 
2012-07-07 03:19:15 PM
the ha ha guy: Here's an even more in-depth (but long) article that speaks volumes about this guy's true motives:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-17/news/michael-salman-wants- to -build-a-church-in-his-backyard-his-neighbors-aren-t-buying-it/

"In July 1992, hoping to scare the hell out of a kid who'd been messing with his girlfriend's little brother, police reports say, Salman donned a Raiders T-shirt and fired five rounds from a .38 special into the kid's house. The boy's mother was home at the time; she told police that one of the bullets nearly grazed her hairline."

"In 1994, Salman had filed paperwork claiming that he belonged to the Embassy of God. That meant, the document claimed, that he didn't need to follow United States law."

"[In 2002,]The Church of All Nations hired him to be its pastor. [...] According to a lawsuit the church's leadership filed against Salman, one of the new pastor's first moves was to put up a sign saying "Harvest Christian Fellowship." That wasn't what they'd bargained for: They were the Church of All Nations, and proud of it. [...] They voted to oust him, and when he fought back and refused to leave, they filed a "forcible detainer" to have him evicted. The judge granted it."

"The city may have to pay for our church to be built," Michael Salman says. The excitement in his voice is unmistakable."


Sounds like a real winner.
 
2012-07-07 03:21:09 PM
hubiestubert: O FFS...

Ha! He calls himself "Kryptologos".
 
2012-07-07 03:22:27 PM
hubiestubert: O FFS...

yea, seems like he's an ass who'll cover himself in whatever it takes to justify his actions

Seems like he's maybe trying to make himself into the next Creflo Dollar, Crouch Family or Osteens, especialy Osteens since that church did start off in the middle of a neighborhood
 
2012-07-07 03:23:56 PM
Curious: the linked Fox Radio article contains this: "Salman said he applied for and was granted the proper building permits. He also said the building has passed a city inspection."

It's possible that he did get the permits and pass the inspection for a RESIDENTIAL building or home extension. He might well be up to code for those, just not for commercial use. Though not strictly for-profit, a church is considered to be a commercial building for zoning purposes due to the comparable occupancy, kind of like building a community theater. Commercial buildings are held to higher zoning standards, so if he lied about the intended use, or originally intended it to be residential but started using it as commercial later on without getting a code check for it, then the fact that he passed some kind of code check at one point isn't good enough.
 
2012-07-07 03:26:57 PM
Igor Jakovsky: wookiee cookie: i built a church in my pants

where's my oppression?

Its all relative to the size of your steeple.


Niiiiiiiiice

/Love Manson
 
2012-07-07 03:27:04 PM
Sabyen91: the ha ha guy: Here's an even more in-depth (but long) article that speaks volumes about this guy's true motives:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-17/news/michael-salman-wants- to -build-a-church-in-his-backyard-his-neighbors-aren-t-buying-it/

"In July 1992, hoping to scare the hell out of a kid who'd been messing with his girlfriend's little brother, police reports say, Salman donned a Raiders T-shirt and fired five rounds from a .38 special into the kid's house. The boy's mother was home at the time; she told police that one of the bullets nearly grazed her hairline."

"In 1994, Salman had filed paperwork claiming that he belonged to the Embassy of God. That meant, the document claimed, that he didn't need to follow United States law."

"[In 2002,]The Church of All Nations hired him to be its pastor. [...] According to a lawsuit the church's leadership filed against Salman, one of the new pastor's first moves was to put up a sign saying "Harvest Christian Fellowship." That wasn't what they'd bargained for: They were the Church of All Nations, and proud of it. [...] They voted to oust him, and when he fought back and refused to leave, they filed a "forcible detainer" to have him evicted. The judge granted it."

"The city may have to pay for our church to be built," Michael Salman says. The excitement in his voice is unmistakable."

Sounds like a real winner.


Typical, the Fark article (Daily Mail) is referring to is missing a LOT of facts. Armed with the rest of the story, I agree with the city. The guy is a douchebag.
 
2012-07-07 03:28:45 PM
Armadillo Slim:
If all this guy wanted to do was worship in peace, he would have gotten this thing zoned properly and obtained the waivers to avoid the taxes. But attention whores need attention to drum up business.


Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!

And we have a winner here....
 
2012-07-07 03:29:39 PM
Trance750: Igor Jakovsky: wookiee cookie: i built a church in my pants

where's my oppression?

Its all relative to the size of your steeple.

Niiiiiiiiice

/Love Manson


And now that song is also stuck in my head
 
2012-07-07 03:30:46 PM
No one really cared until he built a church is his backyard and started holding church services in it. And honestly I would feel the same way if he was running any large regular gathering in his house. 3-5 people over to play cards or D&D is one thing, but when you build a 2000sq foot gaming facility on your property and have around dozens of people show up that's a problem.
 
2012-07-07 03:31:19 PM
Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?
 
2012-07-07 03:33:25 PM
FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

You...didn't read the thread, did you?
 
2012-07-07 03:34:09 PM
Tommy Moo: I'm a hardened atheist and I think this is stupid. Let the man host his dumb meetings. The way to win this cultural war is not through censorship; we must do it by having better ideas and consistently arguing them more eloquently. He is absolutely correct when he says that people are allowed to have weekly poker and football meetings. If he isn't running a business and making money off of these Bible studies, then it's nothing more than having friends over.

I'm a religious conservative, an evangelical Christian, a Republican, and I attend church three times a week--in a location designated specially to handle the high traffic associated with many people showing up to worship three times a week. Even I can see that both you and the subject of this article are idiots. This isn't religious persecution, and that's not a matter of opinion. It's a matter of IQ. Yours is too low to understand the concept of complying with generally applicable laws.
 
2012-07-07 03:34:48 PM
loonatic112358: hubiestubert: O FFS...

yea, seems like he's an ass who'll cover himself in whatever it takes to justify his actions

Seems like he's maybe trying to make himself into the next Creflo Dollar, Crouch Family or Osteens, especialy Osteens since that church did start off in the middle of a neighborhood


When I was working at the Glendale Arena, we had more than a few of Osteens events. The whole organization were assclowns. Just entitled asshats who expected the Arena and everyone in it to kiss their asses. Never a please, never a thank you, always "WE NEED..."

Mohammed Ali is relatively local, and he and his wife came in for concerts and a few games every year, and THAT guy got the red carpet rolled out, but he was always so gracious that you bent over backwards for them.
 
2012-07-07 03:37:01 PM
If I were extremely rich I would buy the house next door and construct a building in my back yard like he did. Instead of a pulpit I would install a stage with poles and have lady friends who happen to be strippers come over and dance while my male friends watched. I would even invite his "friends" over. I am sure he would be all for it.
 
2012-07-07 03:37:06 PM
Igor Jakovsky: Trance750: Igor Jakovsky: wookiee cookie: i built a church in my pants

where's my oppression?

Its all relative to the size of your steeple.

Niiiiiiiiice

/Love Manson

And now that song is also stuck in my head


Could be worse. You could have Air Supply stuck in your head
 
2012-07-07 03:45:27 PM
the ha ha guy: Here's an even more in-depth (but long) article that speaks volumes about this guy's true motives:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-17/news/michael-salman-wants- to -build-a-church-in-his-backyard-his-neighbors-aren-t-buying-it/

"In July 1992, hoping to scare the hell out of a kid who'd been messing with his girlfriend's little brother, police reports say, Salman donned a Raiders T-shirt and fired five rounds from a .38 special into the kid's house. The boy's mother was home at the time; she told police that one of the bullets nearly grazed her hairline."

"In 1994, Salman had filed paperwork claiming that he belonged to the Embassy of God. That meant, the document claimed, that he didn't need to follow United States law."

"[In 2002,]The Church of All Nations hired him to be its pastor. [...] According to a lawsuit the church's leadership filed against Salman, one of the new pastor's first moves was to put up a sign saying "Harvest Christian Fellowship." That wasn't what they'd bargained for: They were the Church of All Nations, and proud of it. [...] They voted to oust him, and when he fought back and refused to leave, they filed a "forcible detainer" to have him evicted. The judge granted it."

"The city may have to pay for our church to be built," Michael Salman says. The excitement in his voice is unmistakable."


OK...so my Spidey Sense that this was some sort of "sovereign citizen" nutter in the "Unregistered Church Movement" IS pretty spot on then :P (As if the "WE'RE the REAL j00s" bit in the Statement of Faith of his church-cum-"bible study" didn't give a hint of that--I've NEVER seen that outside of some truly nutty churches associated with "sovereign citizen" stuff)

It looks like (from the Phoenix New Times article) that this guy had a history of drive-by shootings in gang activity, and (whilst in prison) got introduced to a form of dominionism-flavoured "sovereign citizen" theory promoted by the Embassy of Heaven (basically claiming that they're citizens of the Kingdom of God or Heaven, as a result do not have US citizenship, and further claim they have essentially diplomatic immunity--it's rarer than it was in the 90s, largely because judges have tended to legally biatchslap anyone presenting with "Embassy of Heaven" driver's licenses and bogus liens).

His "ordination" is literally through a mail-order correspondence course operated by a dominionist ordination mill; one of his first acts as a pastor was the attempted steeplejacking of ANOTHER small pentecostal church (calling itself the "Church of All Nations") which ended in a functional split of the congregation and his forcible ouster; AND he apparently bought the property (in the middle of a residential neighbourhood) for the express purpose of building a religious compound on it come hell or high water.

(And apparently he HAS registered with the state--as "Harvest Christian Community Church"; he was stupid, let the original registration of "Harvest Christian Fellowship" lapse, and so a neighbour kindly took the registration as a polite "Fark you, quit shiatting up the neighbourhood kthx". Probably would be worth looking into Arizona non-profit registration records...)

The church also apparently had a former time-sharing arrangement with the First Arabic Baptist Church of Phoenix but wore out its welcome there; interestingly NOT noted in either the Phoenix New Times article or elsewhere--apparently the membership was already large enough when they were sharing space with FABC that they had church buses running. (The Phoenix New Times has noted the ACTUAL size of the congregation is closer to 70 people.)

In other words, just the very sort of fine, upstanding asshat you'd picture doing something like this.

(And no, I seriously doubt even beer or ribs to the neighbours would mollify them. He pretty much flat out told the neighbours in the HOA meeting his intentions (right up to and including nightly services, a "Christian gym", AND a "Christian day care" and school) in almost the same way that the megachurch I escaped did to its neighbourhood, and thus inspired the neighbourhood to fight back; not only that, but his church is one of those weird "Hebrew Christian" cultural-appropriating neopente Jesus Camper affairs where they hold mock "Messianic" Passover seders and other such foolishness...I'm pretty damn sure he doesn't believe in beer, and even the ribs are iffy. :P)
 
2012-07-07 03:47:29 PM
LivefromGA: Typical, the Fark article (Daily Mail) is referring to is missing a LOT of facts. Armed with the rest of the story, I agree with the city. The guy is a douchebag.

Yeah, he is a giant cockbag. He doesn't even have the money to build the actual church. He is trying to stick it to the city and sue them to have it built. What a prick.
 
2012-07-07 03:49:03 PM
Great Porn Dragon: (And no, I seriously doubt even beer or ribs to the neighbours would mollify them. He pretty much flat out told the neighbours in the HOA meeting his intentions

Hell, one of his neighbors has a restraining order against this guy.
 
2012-07-07 03:54:05 PM
Sabyen91: Hell, one of his neighbors has a restraining order against this guy.

Maybe you think that's not real Christian, but you'd be surprised how many people had restraining orders against Jesus.
 
2012-07-07 03:57:55 PM
wookiee cookie: i built a church in my pants

where's my oppression?


in the apse
 
2012-07-07 03:58:35 PM
St_Francis_P: Sabyen91: Hell, one of his neighbors has a restraining order against this guy.

Maybe you think that's not real Christian, but you'd be surprised how many people had restraining orders against Jesus.


To be fair, Jesus Ramirez is kind of a jerk. I mean, he's OK at a party, but you don't want him dating your sister...
 
2012-07-07 03:59:34 PM
Sabyen91: Great Porn Dragon: (And no, I seriously doubt even beer or ribs to the neighbours would mollify them. He pretty much flat out told the neighbours in the HOA meeting his intentions

Hell, one of his neighbors has a restraining order against this guy.


That too, but I didn't want to spoil the ENTIRE article--was just noting that from the very beginning this guy showed himself as a professional Jesus Camper Asshat, Bar None. (After Preacher Boy found out one of his neighbours was especially fast at calling the fire marshal, he pretty much threatened the guy, hence leading to restraining order.)
 
2012-07-07 04:02:05 PM
hubiestubert:
When I was working at the Glendale Arena, we had more than a few of Osteens events. The whole organization were assclowns. Just entitled asshats who expected the Arena and everyone in it to kiss their asses. Never a please, never a thank you, always "WE NEED..."

Mohammed Ali is relatively local, and he and his wife came in for concerts and a few games every year, and THAT guy got the red carpet rolled out, but he was always so gracious that you bent over backwards for them.


This is my complete lack of surprise...

/My former history professor is working on an Ali biography
//Calls Ali the nicest man he's ever met
 
2012-07-07 04:06:28 PM
desertgeek: hubiestubert:
When I was working at the Glendale Arena, we had more than a few of Osteens events. The whole organization were assclowns. Just entitled asshats who expected the Arena and everyone in it to kiss their asses. Never a please, never a thank you, always "WE NEED..."

Mohammed Ali is relatively local, and he and his wife came in for concerts and a few games every year, and THAT guy got the red carpet rolled out, but he was always so gracious that you bent over backwards for them.

This is my complete lack of surprise...

/My former history professor is working on an Ali biography
//Calls Ali the nicest man he's ever met


He is somewhat delicate now, and his wife is fiercely protective, but the whole Arena staff is too. He is the kind of guy who will talk to every fan in turn, even if he's tired or not feeling well. He is just the epitome of class.
 
2012-07-07 04:11:27 PM
RoyBatty: Seeing the property via google, I guess I don't understand either the jail time for these violations (60 days) or the threat to change his probation (on a drive by shooting!) into a 2 1/2 year jail term based on $12K of code violations.

I'd make him bring his building up to code and fine him if he doesn't and foreclose if he doesn't tear down the building or bring it to code or pay the fines.


Well I think that's the way of telling him. But we're listening to HIS narrative of events.

Generally, when these people talk about being "fined", the Code Enforcement has been by over and over and told him something was not allowed, and why, and cite the code and offer him a copy and the right to appeal. He either appealed and lost or refused to appeal at all, they AGAIN assert they'll fine him if he doesn't stop doing it, notice after notice, then gets a fine "for real" but with the caveat that "look, all we want you to do is stop this and comply with the law, if you do that, we will tear this fine up and move on." They probably suggested how he can do what he's doing on an appropriate commercial property and even get tax-exempt status to do so.

But no, you're not going to hear it that way from his narrative. I think he skipped over all the intervention work the did. It's just like they brought him into court one day, out of the blue, and found guilty of 67 code violations, and handed him a 60-day jail term and probation and a $12,180 fine.

Maybe you agree with the basis for intervention, maybe you don't, but it's typically a bullshiat description of the contact that accuses them of bureaucratic, impersonal procedural bullying.
 
2012-07-07 04:12:29 PM
the ha ha guy: Here's an even more in-depth (but long) article that speaks volumes about this guy's true motives:
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-17/news/michael-salman-wants- to -build-a-church-in-his-backyard-his-neighbors-aren-t-buying-it/

"In July 1992, hoping to scare the hell out of a kid who'd been messing with his girlfriend's little brother, police reports say, Salman donned a Raiders T-shirt and fired five rounds from a .38 special into the kid's house. The boy's mother was home at the time; she told police that one of the bullets nearly grazed her hairline."

"In 1994, Salman had filed paperwork claiming that he belonged to the Embassy of God. That meant, the document claimed, that he didn't need to follow United States law."

"[In 2002,]The Church of All Nations hired him to be its pastor. [...] According to a lawsuit the church's leadership filed against Salman, one of the new pastor's first moves was to put up a sign saying "Harvest Christian Fellowship." That wasn't what they'd bargained for: They were the Church of All Nations, and proud of it. [...] They voted to oust him, and when he fought back and refused to leave, they filed a "forcible detainer" to have him evicted. The judge granted it."

"The city may have to pay for our church to be built," Michael Salman says. The excitement in his voice is unmistakable."


You did better at telling the whole story than the writer at the Daily Fail.
 
2012-07-07 04:13:22 PM
Lots of idiots in this thread who are simply showing their anti-religious bigotry. The guy has 4.5 acres to accommodate parking, so the "crowded street argument is destroyed". Also if you think an extra 15 cars driving down your street within the span of a few minutes, 6 times a week is disruptive to you in any way, you're an even bigger moron.

"A January 4, 2010, ruling made it clear that the Salmans are not prohibited from running a church or hosting worship services on their property, but if they do so, they must be in compliance with fire and zoning codes."

For 15 people, farkers. 15. Let that sink in. This doesn't sound a little odd to you? You people look entirely unreasonable, and blatantly hateful of anyone having anything to do with religion.. as usual.
 
2012-07-07 04:15:03 PM
Not news: Submitter completely spins headline in order to get a greenlight.
 
2012-07-07 04:15:54 PM
A January 4, 2010, ruling made it clear that the Salmans are not prohibited from running a church or hosting worship services on their property, but if they do so, they must be in compliance with fire and zoning codes.

See, that's what I'm talking about. Nope! Not good enough! God demands NO ZONING or fire codes! You cannot put an ordinance upon GOD!!! And I'm an emissary of God, which means you need to treat me as you would treat GOD!!
 
2012-07-07 04:17:22 PM
Jesus Loves Fire Hazards
 
2012-07-07 04:18:15 PM
FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.
 
2012-07-07 04:24:05 PM
67 code violations and bein' a Xtian ain't one
 
2012-07-07 04:27:22 PM
Gelatinous: Jesus Loves Fire Hazards

Jesus love me, this I know
For the TV preacher told me so.

Said I should mail him some dough
Or deep in Hell, I will go
 
2012-07-07 04:28:09 PM
Search for Western Theological Seminary: Warning: this site may be compromised.


Oh, and these are apparently batshiat crazy Xtians, like the Branch Davidians.
 
2012-07-07 04:28:18 PM
BraveNewCheneyWorld: Lots of idiots in this thread who are simply showing their anti-religious bigotry. The guy has 4.5 acres to accommodate parking, so the "crowded street argument is destroyed". Also if you think an extra 15 cars driving down your street within the span of a few minutes, 6 times a week is disruptive to you in any way, you're an even bigger moron.

"A January 4, 2010, ruling made it clear that the Salmans are not prohibited from running a church or hosting worship services on their property, but if they do so, they must be in compliance with fire and zoning codes."

For 15 people, farkers. 15. Let that sink in. This doesn't sound a little odd to you? You people look entirely unreasonable, and blatantly hateful of anyone having anything to do with religion.. as usual.


You know how I know you didn't read the thread or look at the case from anything but the Daily Mail's spin?
 
2012-07-07 04:29:46 PM
mikaloyd: FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.


Did you read the Phoenix New Times article? No? K.
 
2012-07-07 04:36:34 PM
ongbok: genner: The guys an idiot and deserves the fines but jail time for a zoning violation....really?

I think the reason why they are throwing the book at him is because if in the future they have to do the same thing to a group of Muslims or another religion and get accused of bigotry, they can point to this guy as an example of how they enforce the codes no matter who you are or what you believe.


So your theory is that they are farking with one of their own as cover in case they get the opportunity, sometime in the future, to fark with some Muslim?

Your tinfoil hat is on way too tight.
 
2012-07-07 04:40:41 PM
mikaloyd: FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.


A few people(a dozen or less) meeting in someone's living room is a bible study. Dozens of people in a purpose built structure is a church. Once you have to build a building to be able to contain all the people that attend, you have some obligations to meet. And none of them are related to your choice of religion.
 
2012-07-07 04:46:51 PM
Are zoning regulations a learned behaviour?
 
2012-07-07 04:48:33 PM
mikaloyd: FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.


I'm pretty sure the First Amendment does not include the right to ignore building code violations. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
2012-07-07 04:49:51 PM
loonatic112358: Silly Jesus: Child abuse should carry a penalty of much more than 60 days.

man, you're starting such bs so early in the thread

i bet you feel pletrole: Atheism is a Religion.

ah hell, i was almost missing your special brand of trolling

almost


I was serious...
 
2012-07-07 04:51:40 PM
FloydA: mikaloyd: FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.

I'm pretty sure the First Amendment does not include the right to ignore building code violations. Please correct me if I'm wrong.


And not to mention: My rights trump and supercede your rights
 
2012-07-07 05:04:18 PM
What kind of skydiver ARE you?

I don't skydive.

Oh, so you're THAT kind of skydiver!

/fekking idiots
 
2012-07-07 05:06:49 PM
Silly Jesus: was serious...

did you forget to switch alt accounts
 
2012-07-07 05:15:27 PM
If atheism is a religion then clear is a color of nail polish.

/doin' it rite!
 
2012-07-07 05:21:58 PM
loonatic112358: Silly Jesus: was serious...

did you forget to switch alt accounts


?
 
2012-07-07 05:22:29 PM
Brubold: This is about government overreach. Pure and simple.

Normally, I'd agree with you, but not in this instance. Search for the guy's name and look at the Phoenix New Times article from 2008; way more background. This dude is running regularly-scheduled church services from his home.

In Phoenix, you don't have to have any special zoning to build a church, so all he had to do was file the proper paperwork and build it to code. Now, he may be a dick for not even attempting to get along with his neighbors, but that's not illegal.

What he did, instead, was pull a permit to build a garage structure (no water or power), and start holding his Religious services in the uncompleted structure. When the city found out, they said "No, it must be completed first... And, hey, didn't you pull a permit for a garage?" he has 67 code violations because he built his "church" building as a residential structure, when churches are required, like commercial enterprises, to have things like exit signs, fire suppression systems and the like.
 
2012-07-07 05:24:43 PM
SubBass49: If you manage to piss off ARIZONA authorities through your religious douchebaggery, then you're REALLY doing something special...

It's got Sheriff Joe's greasy pawprints all over it.
 
2012-07-07 05:24:50 PM
Trance750: FloydA: mikaloyd: FormatSlacker: Don't they already require permits for public gatherings? But you also need permits for private gatherings of 15 people on a huge private property? Who cares about 'freedom of religion,' when did we completely lose freedom of association and the right to peaceably assemble?

Dude, this is FARK where theyd f*ck freedom to death in the gallbladder to get a good "gotcha" in on some chuchy clown. These sort of dorks are the very reason rights have eroded.

I'm pretty sure the First Amendment does not include the right to ignore building code violations. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

And not to mention: My rights trump and supercede your rights



That doesn't necessarily follow.

Unless you mean my right to not get burned alive in a building with too few exits and no fire suppression system trumps his right to ignore building codes, in which case, I can see your point.

If I am killed due to someone else's willful negligence, then all of my rights are lost. So my right to continue living supersedes his right to endanger it.

Is that what you meant? It's kind of hot today and I'm not sure I'm thinking clearly.
 
Displayed 50 of 397 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report