If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Pro tip to Obama: When complaining about how horrible Romney's outsourcing at Bain was, don't have your Secretary of State applauding a new GM plant in Uzbekistan   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 100
    More: Obvious, Uzbekistan, United States, Afghanistan, military operation plan, collective securities, Tiananmen Square, complicity, overtures  
•       •       •

778 clicks; posted to Politics » on 06 Jul 2012 at 12:59 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



100 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-07-06 01:55:51 PM  

s2s2s2: Yeah, that's not how definitions work.


Oh, do go on. Tell me more about how "definitions work". This should be good.
 
2012-07-06 01:56:27 PM  

Biological Ali: Are you under the impression that people people criticized Bain because they somehow had something against the idea of American companies making profits?


No, I was suggesting that someone who normally wouldn't use that as a positive, was suddenly willing to use that as a positive. PROFITS!!

Soup4Bonnie: Please explain how GM is doing this in this instance


GN is the outsource-ee. INCLUSISOURCING!
 
2012-07-06 01:57:06 PM  
*GM
 
2012-07-06 01:58:51 PM  

s2s2s2: No, I was suggesting that someone who normally wouldn't use that as a positive, was suddenly willing to use that as a positive. PROFITS!!


Right. So you really don't know what the criticisms of Bain were about, then.
 
2012-07-06 01:59:39 PM  

Biological Ali: Oh, do go on. Tell me more about how "definitions work". This should be good.


Select "definitions" > right click > "Look up 'definitions'" > click on Dictionary > Copy > Paste:

definition |ˌdefəˈniSHən|
noun
1 a statement of the exact meaning of a word, esp. in a dictionary.
• an exact statement or description of the nature, scope, or meaning of something: our definition of what constitutes poetry.
• the action or process of defining something.
 
2012-07-06 02:00:35 PM  

Biological Ali: Right. So you really don't know what the criticisms of Bain were about, then.


Find that devil yet?
 
2012-07-06 02:02:54 PM  

s2s2s2: GN is the outsource-ee. INCLUSISOURCING!


Even correcting the typo, you make less and less sense.
 
2012-07-06 02:07:17 PM  

s2s2s2: Biological Ali: Right. So you really don't know what the criticisms of Bain were about, then.

Find that devil yet?


Of course they were perfect angels. The wealthy all are. Criticizing the rich n is bordering on heresy.
 
2012-07-06 02:07:51 PM  

s2s2s2: Biological Ali: Oh, do go on. Tell me more about how "definitions work". This should be good.

Select "definitions" > right click > "Look up 'definitions'" > click on Dictionary > Copy > Paste:

definition |ˌdefəˈniSHən|
noun
1 a statement of the exact meaning of a word, esp. in a dictionary.
• an exact statement or description of the nature, scope, or meaning of something: our definition of what constitutes poetry.
• the action or process of defining something.


Haha, oh wow. Dude seriously, you should just take a break from this thread. There are times when a person can successfully play off an inane opening statement as "Aw shucks, I was just messin' with y'all!" This is not one of those times.
 
2012-07-06 02:11:43 PM  
Subby doesn't know what "outsourcing" means.
 
2012-07-06 02:20:14 PM  

Philip Francis Queeg: Of course they were perfect angels.


Oh goodness no. Neither has GM been.

Biological Ali: Haha, oh wow. Dude seriously, you should just take a break from this thread. There are times when a person can successfully play off an inane opening statement as "Aw shucks, I was just messin' with y'all!" This is not one of those times.


Reading and Comprehension at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen.
 
2012-07-06 02:23:25 PM  

s2s2s2: Biological Ali: Haha, oh wow. Dude seriously, you should just take a break from this thread. There are times when a person can successfully play off an inane opening statement as "Aw shucks, I was just messin' with y'all!" This is not one of those times.

Reading and Comprehension at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen.


lolpie.com

To be fair, that time would have been several posts ago, but you could still cut your losses even now. Maybe.
 
2012-07-06 02:23:28 PM  

s2s2s2: Philip Francis Queeg: Of course they were perfect angels.

Oh goodness no. Neither has GM been.


Well since both are equally bad.....
 
2012-07-06 02:25:12 PM  
China has slapped a tariff on GM products coming from the US because GM received a US Govt bailout.

Uzi-made cars don't have the same tariff and shipping is far cheaper than Canadian/Euro-made cars.

Why does the Nuge hate capitalism?
 
2012-07-06 02:28:31 PM  

Biological Ali: s2s2s2: Biological Ali: Haha, oh wow. Dude seriously, you should just take a break from this thread. There are times when a person can successfully play off an inane opening statement as "Aw shucks, I was just messin' with y'all!" This is not one of those times.

Reading and Comprehension at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen.

[lolpie.com image 410x307]

To be fair, that time would have been several posts ago, but you could still cut your losses even now. Maybe.


It's pretty hilarious to watch you lose an argument, then try to tell the other person that they should stop posting before they look dumb. Careful, or you'll be cast in the Exorcist Re-ReBoot with that spin.
 
2012-07-06 02:29:46 PM  

SacriliciousBeerSwiller: Subby doesn't know what "outsourcing" means.


So Bain didn't outsource?
Pro tip to Obama: When complaining about how horrible Romney's outsourcing at Bain was, don't have your Secretary of State applauding a new GM plant in Uzbekistan
 
2012-07-06 02:30:45 PM  

Philip Francis Queeg: Well since both are equally bad.....


You really should take the blinders off and read my posts.
 
2012-07-06 02:36:13 PM  

Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.


By that comment I assume that you must be able point to American workers Romney fired so that he could give their jobs to foreigners.
 
2012-07-06 02:39:09 PM  

The_Six_Fingered_Man: It's pretty hilarious to watch you lose an argument, then try to tell the other person that they should stop posting before they look dumb. Careful, or you'll be cast in the Exorcist Re-ReBoot with that spin.


Eh? The person I've been responding to isn't even making an argument - it's just been offhand silliness followed by feigned confusion when people try to actually pin down what he's trying to say.

Not sure why you felt compelled to fall on your face like this, but sure - whatever floats your boat.
 
2012-07-06 02:41:18 PM  

colon_pow: Soup4Bonnie: s2s2s2:

It's not outsourcing if Americans don't lose their jobs to foreign workers. It's sort of the whole definition of outsourcing.

those cars could have been made here. by americans. then shipped and sold over there. there's a whole factory-load of american people who don't have jobs because of this.

so there's that.

or you could pretend otherwise...


It depends on where these cars are going to be sold. Resource wise, manufacturing nearer the market makes better sense.

Manufacturing cars for the US market in Mexico, that's outsourcing. Manufacturing cars IN Mexico, for the Mexican market, makes good sense. Manufacturing cars in Eastern Europe for those markets, makes good sense, and cuts down transport costs.

I understand that it's easier to see things in simple black and white, but with a few keystrokes, you can see that these cars are meant for the Kazakh and Russian markets.

Would you say that it makes great business sense to ship cars from the US all that way? Would you say that is good for the shareholders? Good for the company?

Outsourcing, so that you can ship right back to the states, that's one thing. Manufacturing near your foreign market is another.
 
2012-07-06 02:43:38 PM  

Biological Ali: The_Six_Fingered_Man: It's pretty hilarious to watch you lose an argument, then try to tell the other person that they should stop posting before they look dumb. Careful, or you'll be cast in the Exorcist Re-ReBoot with that spin.

Eh? The person I've been responding to isn't even making an argument - it's just been offhand silliness followed by feigned confusion when people try to actually pin down what he's trying to say.

Not sure why you felt compelled to fall on your face like this, but sure - whatever floats your boat.


You are quibbling over the proper definition of outsourcing. When presented with a proper definition, you offer no rebuttal, no expanded definition of "what people mean." You jump right to "you are dumb and your definition smells like the underside of a hobo's nutsack."

You flailed around, quite humorously I might add. How about you provide us with an accurate depiction of the outsourcing that took place with Bain and tell us how it doesn't fit the dictionary definition of outsourcing.
 
2012-07-06 02:46:03 PM  

jjorsett: By that comment I assume that you must be able point to American workers Romney fired so that he could give their jobs to foreigners.


First, the Romney camp's defense in this case amounts to a distinction without a difference for displaced American workers who don't much care if a company ships jobs overseas directly or just invests in people who show companies how to do the job-shipping.
 
2012-07-06 02:52:47 PM  

The_Six_Fingered_Man: You are quibbling over the proper definition of outsourcing. When presented with a proper definition, you offer no rebuttal, no expanded definition of "what people mean." You jump right to "you are dumb and your definition smells like the underside of a hobo's nutsack."


Here's the thing. When someone posts the dictionary's definition of the word "definition" in response to a question about how definitions work (after that person himself has made the claim that definitions don't "work" in some particular way), I can only assume that he's trying to make a joke. This is me giving him the benefit of the doubt.

You, on the other hand, seem to think that I should instead continued debating the point - which, of course would have required me to assume the poster to be cognitively impaired to the point where he would have said something like that in seriousness. I disagree. I don't make insults like that lightly.
 
2012-07-06 02:58:45 PM  
Dang, I somehow missed this part:

The_Six_Fingered_Man: You flailed around, quite humorously I might add. How about you provide us with an accurate depiction of the outsourcing that took place with Bain and tell us how it doesn't fit the dictionary definition of outsourcing.


Even in the context of what you seem to think the "argument" was about, this makes no sense. Where have I argued that what Bain did "doesn't fit the dictionary definition of outsourcing"?
 
2012-07-06 03:01:10 PM  

FlashHarry: jesus, freepers are just so farking stupid. every time they think they've "gotcha!" it turns out that they have no argument at all or their facts are wrong or they're taking something completely out of context - sometimes all three. i can't remember the last time i heard a cogent, well-reasoned argument from a rightwing blog. seriously.


Couldn't agree more. And you hear these "gotcha" moments multiple times a day on Fark.com. Honestly, it seems as though the strategy is to just constantly sling shiat and it either sticks so they can schmear it over and over and over, or it doesn't stick but who cares, because meanwhile they've slung a few dozen more deuces that have a chance at sticking.

Yeah, I guess I did just call Fark.com a big freeper shiatpile.
 
2012-07-06 03:01:13 PM  

colon_pow: those cars could have been made here. by americans. then shipped and sold over there. there's a whole factory-load of american people who don't have jobs because of this.

so there's that.



Since I am learning all the online stuff:

notsureifserious.jpg
 
2012-07-06 03:04:25 PM  

Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.


yep

If GM is moving into whatever that region that was south western USSR is called, this is a good thing
 
2012-07-06 03:07:08 PM  

Raharu: BillCo: Wow, he actually showed some respect for the office of the President of the United States. That's a first. I hope he remembered to bow.

You sound tired Bill.


I think he looks tired. Doesn't he look tired?
 
2012-07-06 03:09:31 PM  

jjorsett: Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.

By that comment I assume that you must be able point to American workers Romney fired so that he could give their jobs to foreigners.


Are you specifically talking about Romney, or companies he worked with/for?

Are you also saying this particular move by GM is Obama's decision?

Because you can certainly say the Obama administration supports GM's move, as well as saying Romney supported Bain's move.

Is this too nuanced for you? Would you rather we keep it at "Obama bad"?
 
2012-07-06 03:12:06 PM  
If the details of the story confirm that GM moved jobs from the US to another country, then this FINALLY, would be a legitimate criticism of Obama to some degree.

Congratulations, GOP it has only taken you three and half years to pull your head out of your ass at least once!
 
2012-07-06 03:20:08 PM  

Sybarite: Yes, I'm outraged that cars manufactured and sold in Asia are profiting an American owned company.


You mean you'd accept all that dirty foreign money? Probably got the gay and socialist germs all over it.
 
2012-07-06 03:21:35 PM  

The Stealth Hippopotamus:

I really have no problem with this. If we want manufacturing jobs we need to compete in the global market for them.


Okay, disband the EPA and labor unions, eliminate child labor laws, the minimum wage, and incoming work visas. Then we'll talk.

Oh yeah, your standard of living...you can pitch that also.
 
2012-07-06 03:22:15 PM  

iaazathot: If the details of the story confirm that GM moved jobs from the US to another country, then this FINALLY, would be a legitimate criticism of Obama to some degree.


they don't. it isn't.
 
2012-07-06 04:43:28 PM  
Until we start actually importing those vehicles from Uzbekistan, you subby are a f*cking idiot.
 
2012-07-06 04:50:46 PM  

colon_pow: Soup4Bonnie: s2s2s2:

It's not outsourcing if Americans don't lose their jobs to foreign workers. It's sort of the whole definition of outsourcing.

those cars could have been made here. by americans. then shipped and sold over there. there's a whole factory-load of american people who don't have jobs because of this.

so there's that.

or you could pretend otherwise...


You really don't know what outsourcing and much about global business.
 
2012-07-06 05:45:22 PM  
If only we had a major party candidate who is against outsourcing.

Oh wait, we don't.

America.
 
2012-07-06 05:51:51 PM  

farkityfarker: If only we had a major party candidate who is against outsourcing.

Oh wait, we don't.

America.


Yeah, fark those poor people and their getting paid more than they could without Uncle Sam! How dare we ask hardworking Americans to sacrifice shiat-paying jobs (by our standards) to make a better life for those across far flung borders?
 
2012-07-06 05:53:13 PM  
When the heck did liberal start to understand the financials on this type of economic activities? I swear more than a few time I have explained the benefits of having us owned manufacturing facilities in india and china to service that region only to be yelled at that the items should have been made here nonetheless. I guess you have to attack Obama in order for them to think.
 
2012-07-06 06:01:04 PM  
Did you mean Uzbecki-becki-beckistan-Stan-Stan? Because if you did, I can guarantee that it was made with inferior Potassium.
 
2012-07-06 06:21:57 PM  

Saiga410: When the heck did liberal start to understand the financials on this type of economic activities? I swear more than a few time I have explained the benefits of having us owned manufacturing facilities in india and china to service that region only to be yelled at that the items should have been made here nonetheless. I guess you have to attack Obama in order for them to think.


And we have a winner.
 
2012-07-06 06:42:30 PM  

farkityfarker: If only we had a major party candidate who is against outsourcing.

Oh wait, we don't.

America.


There is no new case of outsourcing happening in this situation. Opening NEW manufacturing channels which are geographically convenient to your NEW sales channels without sacrificing current jobs to do it is not by itself outsourcing. Now, if they were using a vendor to do it, that would be in the non-offshoring sense, but as the pedants might note, this is not offshoring, which is supported by just one current candidate, as no process is being moved offshore.
 
2012-07-06 07:41:42 PM  

Saiga410: When the heck did liberal start to understand the financials on this type of economic activities? I swear more than a few time I have explained the benefits of having us owned manufacturing facilities in india and china to service that region only to be yelled at that the items should have been made here nonetheless. I guess you have to attack Obama in order for them to think.


Well they were stupid. There is more than one person posting on this site you know.
 
2012-07-06 09:31:12 PM  
All you need to know about Bain capital is to visit a modern Dunkin' Donuts dispensary.
 
2012-07-07 07:27:13 AM  
Protip to subby: apples aren't oranges. Quit comparing them.
 
2012-07-07 10:01:58 AM  

Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.


Outsourcing ok if anti-union liberal President spouts it for Farktard liberals. Got it.

You point to where the plant should be built so American workers can build the cars, and export them to wherever.

Yes, anti-union. GM plant in America = Union Workers. GM plant in Russiakstan = non-union labor. President Obama is against unions. REMEMBER WISCONSIN!!
 
2012-07-07 10:30:39 AM  

Tumunga: Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.

Outsourcing ok if anti-union liberal President spouts it for Farktard liberals. Got it.

You point to where the plant should be built so American workers can build the cars, and export them to wherever.

Yes, anti-union. GM plant in America = Union Workers. GM plant in Russiakstan = non-union labor. President Obama is against unions. REMEMBER WISCONSIN!!


Apples ≠ oranges.
 
2012-07-07 05:26:07 PM  

Tumunga: Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.

Outsourcing ok if anti-union liberal President spouts it for Farktard liberals. Got it.

You point to where the plant should be built so American workers can build the cars, and export them to wherever.

Yes, anti-union. GM plant in America = Union Workers. GM plant in Russiakstan = non-union labor. President Obama is against unions. REMEMBER WISCONSIN!!


Step 1: Press quote on a post you didn't read.

Step 2: Post random verbal vomit without understanding the content of the post or the article that has been referenced.

Step 3: ???

Step 4: PROFIT!!
 
2012-07-08 10:11:25 AM  
One bright point in GM's business, even through the darkest hours in 08, has been their emerging market (i.e. everywhere but North America and Europe) strategy.

They've kicked butt in the places like China where companies like ford are desperately trying to copy their success.

Demanding they stop executing a winning strategy in foreign markets is requesting them to fail, and praying for the destruction of thousands of American jobs in the process..

// Par for the course for republicans...

I
 
2012-07-08 09:32:03 PM  

jodaveki: Tumunga: Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.

Outsourcing ok if anti-union liberal President spouts it for Farktard liberals. Got it.

You point to where the plant should be built so American workers can build the cars, and export them to wherever.

Yes, anti-union. GM plant in America = Union Workers. GM plant in Russiakstan = non-union labor. President Obama is against unions. REMEMBER WISCONSIN!!

Apples ≠ oranges.


Whipped cream = whipped cream.
 
2012-07-08 09:33:00 PM  

Leishu: Tumunga: Codenamechaz: Now if subby can point to where American workers were fired so this plant can open, then you'll have equivalency.

Outsourcing ok if anti-union liberal President spouts it for Farktard liberals. Got it.

You point to where the plant should be built so American workers can build the cars, and export them to wherever.

Yes, anti-union. GM plant in America = Union Workers. GM plant in Russiakstan = non-union labor. President Obama is against unions. REMEMBER WISCONSIN!!

Step 1: Press quote on a post you didn't read.

Step 2: Post random verbal vomit without understanding the content of the post or the article that has been referenced.

Step 3: ???

Step 4: PROFIT!!


Whars the profit, WHAR!??? (rent's coming due)
 
Displayed 50 of 100 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report