Wolf_Blitzer: Emma Stone is a natural blonde, submitter.
DeltaPunch: Does anybody actually say "bing it"? I've never heard anybody say that, ever.
GreenAdder: [i.imgur.com image 512x425]I thought it was a very interesting three-way cross-promotion.
elvindeath: Seriously - I consider myself pretty computer saavy. I don't think I've ever used Bing in my life. Does anyone ? While we're on the topic, is there anyone out there who actually uses Google+ ?Must suck to be the latecomer. Just ask the HP Tablet.
Summoner101: Wolf_Blitzer: Emma Stone is a natural blonde, submitter.So you're saying the curtains match the drapes?
elvindeath: Seriously - I consider myself pretty computer saavy. I don't think I've ever used Bing in my life. Does anyone ?
Mugato: Sony is obnoxious with their product placement. They released Jack and Jill and the historically whoorish James Bond films.
MrEricSir: Every once in a blue moon Google is down for a few seconds, so I use Bing instead. It works okay, but not great. I'd give it a C+.
chewielouie: Finally, saw the trailer for The Hobbit. Relax people, it looks stunning.
chewielouie: equipped with Dbox motion seats seats
chewielouie: Also, the theatre I saw it in was equipped with Dbox motion seats seats
Cosmoboy: She's never been hotter.
Knarf: yeah, I just use bing the internet for porn vids. It's good for that and little else
0Icky0: chewielouie: Finally, saw the trailer for The Hobbit. Relax people, it looks stunning.People were expecting it not to be stunning?
velvet_fog: [i.telegraph.co.uk image 620x388]
chewielouie: The product placement did not bother me at all. For me, it was just delightful to see, as expected, how wrong the Fark opinion that the movie would suck was. Although it wasn't perfect, and not as good IMO as Spider-Man 1 & 2, it was very good. The fight scenes were spectacular and it is BY FAR the most visually striking movie I have seen in 3D to date. If you thought Prometheus looked good, ASM looked better. Don't even bother arguing the point, it did. Also, the theatre I saw it in was equipped with Dbox motion seats seats. The chairs were made for this movie.Finally, saw the trailer for The Hobbit. Relax people, it looks stunning.
Cosmoboy: 0Icky0: chewielouie: Finally, saw the trailer for The Hobbit. Relax people, it looks stunning.People were expecting it not to be stunning?Yup, because it's being filmed or shown (I'm just not sure on the details) at a higher frame rate than normal. It does look different. It looks more real.
Dumb-Ass-Monkey: I dunno, I think that the movies that show everybody using an iProduct, and nothing but an iProduct, is more obtrusive.
Disposable Rob: velvet_fog: [i.telegraph.co.uk image 620x388][static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]
styckx: Can someone explain to me why a movie that first came out 10 years ago needs a remake telling the same exact farking story? The original 2002 movie still holds up extremely well and so do the followups. Not even being snarky I just don't get why anyone would be retarded enough to pay for the same story again.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jun 28 2017 23:19:13
Runtime: 0.476 sec (475 ms)