If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Joe Biden, channeling Rodney Dangerfield: "You've got to give Mitt Romney credit - he is a job creator... in Singapore, China and India"   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 163
    More: Amusing, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden, Singapore, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Swiss bank accounts, American workers  
•       •       •

1748 clicks; posted to Politics » on 26 Jun 2012 at 8:03 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



163 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-06-26 04:49:08 PM
Nice one Joe!

Expect to see that in ads any day now.
 
2012-06-26 05:12:37 PM
I believe the Oh Snap criteria has been fulfilled.
 
2012-06-26 05:39:39 PM
i72.photobucket.com
 
2012-06-26 06:09:24 PM
Well if Old Joe could have created a job for every gaff he's made the unemployment problem would already be solved.
 
2012-06-26 08:06:36 PM
Not the image I was looking for, but I'm too lazy to keep looking in my folders.


ic.pics.livejournal.com
 
2012-06-26 08:07:17 PM
never mind, I found the original one I wanted.

ic.pics.livejournal.com
 
2012-06-26 08:08:30 PM
just like ole' bush was a uniter, not a divider. Mitt Rmoney
 
2012-06-26 08:08:45 PM
Hurr Durr Biden Gaffes hurr durr he never says anything relevant or...f*cking right on, in this case.
 
2012-06-26 08:09:07 PM
Hey, but they're still jobs, right?
 
2012-06-26 08:10:14 PM
Agreed, but what have the Democrats done to stop or reduce outsourcing in the past 30 years?
 
2012-06-26 08:11:10 PM
You know its bad when Biden is ripping on you hard.
 
2012-06-26 08:12:44 PM
For you, Joe.
i1163.photobucket.com
 
2012-06-26 08:13:37 PM

farkityfarker: Agreed, but what have the Democrats done to stop or reduce outsourcing in the past 30 years?


Yeah, yeah.... both sides are bad... so vote accordingly.

But in reality you're right. The dem's are less bad, but in a lot of important facets they are complicit. They need to try stuff and fail rather than just trying to "poo-poo" on the issues after the fact with no substance, only criticism.
 
2012-06-26 08:14:52 PM

chiett: Well if Old Joe could have created a job for every gaff he's made the unemployment problem would already be solved.


You DO know the definition of gaffe is "accidentally speaking the truth"? And that's bad, because ...?
 
2012-06-26 08:16:28 PM
No respect, I tell you. No respect.
 
2012-06-26 08:18:04 PM
November 6, 2012:

theblacksphere.net

"Hey, everybody! We're all gonna get laid!"

llwproductions.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-06-26 08:19:58 PM
McLovin' this guy.
 
2012-06-26 08:20:57 PM
So many lines of counterattack...Do you bring up the Obama Free Trade agreements? Or the standard "Liberals are racist against [insert people from foreign country with slave labor wages]!" Or maybe the classic "why do leftists hate free markets? What's wrong with freedom?" Meh, let's keep it simple - neither 0bama or Biden has had a job in the private sector - they're mooches from the government and don't know the meaning of creating a job.
 
2012-06-26 08:21:18 PM

fusillade762: Hey, but they're still jobs, right?


And don't forget THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING HAS INCREASED. Significantly.
 
2012-06-26 08:21:40 PM

farkityfarker: Agreed, but what have the Democrats done to stop or reduce outsourcing in the past 30 years?


How about the anti-outsourcing bill that was killed by Republican filibuster in 2010?
 
2012-06-26 08:21:45 PM
No one does the bon mots like Joe Biden.
 
2012-06-26 08:22:15 PM

AverageAmericanGuy: No respect, I tell you. No respect.


Respect is earned. What has Rmoney done to earn it?
 
2012-06-26 08:22:22 PM

Shaggy_C: 0bama


*lolhurrdurrfistbrobump*
 
2012-06-26 08:22:32 PM
Yea, cause Obama is fighting for our jobs...

A critical document from President Barack Obama's free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises.

The leaked document has been posted on the website of Citizens Trade Campaign, a long-time critic of the administration's trade objectives. The new leak follows substantial controversy surrounding the secrecy of the talks, in which some members of Congress have complained they are not being given the same access to trade documents that corporate officials receive.

"The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in a written statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been so incensed by the lack of access as to introduce legislation requiring further disclosure. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has gone so far as to leak a separate document from the talks on his website. Other Senators are considering writing a letter to Ron Kirk, the top trade negotiator under Obama, demanding more disclosure.

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.


Oh, wait... He's actually fighting to give radical new powers to his obscenely wealthy "job creator" friends.
 
2012-06-26 08:23:15 PM

Leo Bloom's Freakout: farkityfarker: Agreed, but what have the Democrats done to stop or reduce outsourcing in the past 30 years?

Yeah, yeah.... both sides are bad... so vote accordingly.

But in reality you're right. The dem's are less bad, but in a lot of important facets they are complicit. They need to try stuff and fail rather than just trying to "poo-poo" on the issues after the fact with no substance, only criticism.


Canadian politics at its finest. We don't vote them in, we vote them out.
 
2012-06-26 08:23:34 PM
See folks...Trickle-Down Econ DOES work....just not for American workers.
 
2012-06-26 08:24:55 PM

BullBearMS: Yea, cause Obama is fighting for our jobs...

A critical document from President Barack Obama's free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises.

The leaked document has been posted on the website of Citizens Trade Campaign, a long-time critic of the administration's trade objectives. The new leak follows substantial controversy surrounding the secrecy of the talks, in which some members of Congress have complained they are not being given the same access to trade documents that corporate officials receive.

"The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in a written statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been so incensed by the lack of access as to introduce legislation requiring further disclosure. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has gone so far as to leak a separate document from the talks on his website. Other Senators are considering writing a letter to Ron Kirk, the top trade negotiator under Obama, demanding more disclosure.

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Oh, wait... He's actually fighting to give radical new powers to his obscenely wealthy "job creator" friends.


So vote Republican!
 
2012-06-26 08:25:03 PM
Both sides are bad, so revolution.
 
2012-06-26 08:25:53 PM

mr lawson: See folks...Trickle-Down Econ DOES work....just not for American workers.


Exactly, as long as you can find countries that have employment laws that could best be described as "I can't believe it's not slavery."
 
2012-06-26 08:29:39 PM
Joe Biden and Waterloo go together like ham and cheese. He can connect in a way that Mittens will never, ever understand as he stands aloof behind the chain-link fence of his members-only country club looking out at America. His hair is perfect but he'll never be able to understand why no one likes him.

Poor mittens. he needs a kittens.
 
2012-06-26 08:30:33 PM
If he keeps this awesomeness up, somebody will need to 'shop a Biden Trollface.
 
2012-06-26 08:32:24 PM

chiett: Well if Old Joe could have created a job for every gaff he's made the unemployment problem would already be solved.


You should slap yourself for saying something so stupid
 
2012-06-26 08:33:00 PM

Fluorescent Testicle: If he keeps this awesomeness up, somebody will need to 'shop a Biden Trollface.


my GIS fails me, but I wouldn't be suprised if someone hadn't already.
 
2012-06-26 08:33:34 PM
Joe Biden is one of the best things about the Obama administration. Choosing him as his VP was an absolutely inspired choice.
 
2012-06-26 08:34:08 PM
Final Senate Vote on NAFTA

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R.3450 )

Biden (D-DE), Yea
 
2012-06-26 08:34:17 PM
Biden is getting impatient. He is beginning to think that he'll have no one to debate over the election.
 
2012-06-26 08:34:43 PM

DarwiOdrade: So vote Republican!


So stop pretending either one of them is anything other than a sold out tool of the obscenely wealthy.

dl.dropbox.com
 
2012-06-26 08:36:15 PM

LoneWolf343: Biden is getting impatient. He is beginning to think that he'll have no one to debate over the election.


I don't know why that would matter. Its not like he had anyone to debate in the last election either.
 
2012-06-26 08:37:33 PM

BullBearMS: Yea, cause Obama is fighting for our jobs...

A critical document from President Barack Obama's free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises.

The leaked document has been posted on the website of Citizens Trade Campaign, a long-time critic of the administration's trade objectives. The new leak follows substantial controversy surrounding the secrecy of the talks, in which some members of Congress have complained they are not being given the same access to trade documents that corporate officials receive.

"The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in a written statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been so incensed by the lack of access as to introduce legislation requiring further disclosure. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has gone so far as to leak a separate document from the talks on his website. Other Senators are considering writing a letter to Ron Kirk, the top trade negotiator under Obama, demanding more disclosure.

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Oh, wait... He's actually fighting to give radical new powers to his obscenely wealthy "job creator" friends.


For fark's sake.
 
2012-06-26 08:38:22 PM

chiett: Well if Old Joe could have created a job for every gaff he's made the unemployment problem would already be solved.


Hurr.
 
2012-06-26 08:40:20 PM
Call center and light manufacturing jobs are what we need. Americans are amped to do those.
 
2012-06-26 08:41:26 PM

StopLurkListen: You DO know the definition of gaffe is "accidentally speaking the truth"? And that's bad, because ...?


Dimwit doesn't even know how to spell "gaff" (sic). You think he/she/it has any idea of the definition of the word?
 
2012-06-26 08:43:19 PM

BullBearMS: Yea, cause Obama is fighting for our jobs...

A critical document from President Barack Obama's free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises.

The leaked document has been posted on the website of Citizens Trade Campaign, a long-time critic of the administration's trade objectives. The new leak follows substantial controversy surrounding the secrecy of the talks, in which some members of Congress have complained they are not being given the same access to trade documents that corporate officials receive.

"The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in a written statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been so incensed by the lack of access as to introduce legislation requiring further disclosure. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has gone so far as to leak a separate document from the talks on his website. Other Senators are considering writing a letter to Ron Kirk, the top trade negotiator under Obama, demanding more disclosure.

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Oh, wait... He's actually fighting to give radical new powers to his obscenely wealthy "job creator" friends.


Time to abandon both political parties, they're both only on the side of the 1%.
 
2012-06-26 08:46:10 PM
...and folks are wondering why Romney keeps having folks say, "Yeah, don't even put my name in the hat"?

It was sort of fun watching him play with Palin, and I don't blame folks for not wanting to have to defend Romney in public...
 
2012-06-26 08:46:46 PM

dervish16108: BullBearMS: Yea, cause Obama is fighting for our jobs...

A critical document from President Barack Obama's free trade negotiations with eight Pacific nations was leaked online early Wednesday morning, revealing that the administration intends to bestow radical new political powers upon multinational corporations, contradicting prior promises.

The leaked document has been posted on the website of Citizens Trade Campaign, a long-time critic of the administration's trade objectives. The new leak follows substantial controversy surrounding the secrecy of the talks, in which some members of Congress have complained they are not being given the same access to trade documents that corporate officials receive.

"The outrageous stuff in this leaked text may well be why U.S. trade officials have been so extremely secretive about these past two years of [trade] negotiations," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in a written statement.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has been so incensed by the lack of access as to introduce legislation requiring further disclosure. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has gone so far as to leak a separate document from the talks on his website. Other Senators are considering writing a letter to Ron Kirk, the top trade negotiator under Obama, demanding more disclosure.

The newly leaked document is one of the most controversial of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact. It addresses a broad sweep of regulations governing international investment and reveals the Obama administration's advocacy for policies that environmental activists, financial reform advocates and labor unions have long rejected for eroding key protections currently in domestic laws.

Oh, wait... He's actually fighting to give radical new powers to his obscenely wealthy "job creator" friends.

Time to abandon both political parties, they're both only on the side of the 1%.


So which Republican that claims to be a "libertarian" should we vote for?
 
2012-06-26 08:47:28 PM

stoli n coke: mr lawson: See folks...Trickle-Down Econ DOES work....just not for American workers.

Exactly, as long as you can find countries that have employment laws that could best be described as "I can't believe it's not slavery."


I think this is the part that pisses me off most when people proclaim "Trickle-down doesn't work". It DOES work! However, these people are actuall meaning it doesn't work for THEM. Which is correct.
All money flows (trickles) from top down whether the top is from the wealthy or from the government down to the poor. Money makes no distinction between the two. The question is how the effect from the top got the money in the first place. If from the government, it was acquired from the wealthy via taxes. Which means no additional value was created. However the multiplier effect (velocity) from the poor does create value. If from the wealthy, then value was created by way of good/services sold; however with a much lower multiplier effect namely because the capital to create the product (jobs) are not based in this country.

/this prob won't make sense
 
2012-06-26 08:47:35 PM

hubiestubert: ...and folks are wondering why Romney keeps having folks say, "Yeah, don't even put my name in the hat"?


I still think he should go with Pawlenty. Just imagine all the excit...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
2012-06-26 08:48:06 PM
BURN!

I would hate to be the guy that Mitt Romney picks as his VP. Joe ain't holding back during the debates.
 
2012-06-26 08:53:14 PM

SilentStrider: hubiestubert: ...and folks are wondering why Romney keeps having folks say, "Yeah, don't even put my name in the hat"?

I still think he should go with Pawlenty. Just imagine all the excit...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Pawlenty has at least a sense of humor at times. Someone on the ticket has to...
 
2012-06-26 08:53:52 PM

Shaggy_C: Final Senate Vote on NAFTA

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 103rd Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R.3450 )

Biden (D-DE), Yea


Remember when Obama pretended to be concerned with the loss of American manufacturing jobs to Mexico in the last campaign cycle and promised to renegotiate portions of NAFTA?

Whatever became of that?

President Barack Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderón agreed Thursday to remove most restrictions on trucking across the U.S.-Mexico border, sparking furor from the Teamsters and raising concerns for truckers on both sides of the border - for different reasons.

The American Trucking Association praised the announcement, saying it will promote trade. The Teamsters and certain trucking companies oppose the deal, saying it sacrifices American jobs when unemployment is high so that big business can save money partly by hiring cheaper drivers.


Ah yes. Giving America's manufacturing jobs to Mexican citizens wasn't quite enough. The "job creators" also want to give America's union service economy jobs to them too.

Naturally, being owned by the obscenely wealthy, Obama is in favor of this as well. The "job creators" shouldn't be forced to pay Americans a living wage, after all.
 
Displayed 50 of 163 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report