If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Next up on the VP train out of Romneytown: Condoleeza Rice. "There's no way I'd be Romney's VP"   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 103
    More: Obvious, Condoleeza Rice, Man Jumping, Arab Uprisings, trains, vice presidents  
•       •       •

1373 clicks; posted to Politics » on 26 Jun 2012 at 11:19 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



103 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-06-26 11:17:04 AM  
Gotta make a move to a town thats right for me

Gotta keep a herpin and a derpin with the energy

Well I lie about it lie about it lie about it lie about it

Lie about lie about lie about everything.

Won't you take me to

Romneytown

Won't you take me to

Romneytown.
 
2012-06-26 11:21:21 AM  
Right, she has no interest.
Unequivocal about it too.
But people keep floating her name.
I don't get it.
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.
 
2012-06-26 11:22:01 AM  

carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.


And who might that be?
 
2012-06-26 11:22:34 AM  

carrion_luggage: Right, she has no interest.
Unequivocal about it too.
But people keep floating her name.
I don't get it.
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.


We do?
 
2012-06-26 11:23:29 AM  

Don't Troll Me Bro!: carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

And who might that be?


R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.
 
2012-06-26 11:23:44 AM  
At this rate, the only person who will want to be Mitt Romney's VP is Mitt Romney.
 
2012-06-26 11:24:33 AM  
Condoleezza Rice: But I don't remember the al‐Qaida cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.
Richard Ben-Veniste: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB [Presidential Daily Briefing] warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?
Condoleezza Rice: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.

/historical document
 
2012-06-26 11:25:24 AM  

carrion_luggage:
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.



No, we really don't. Much like most of the others who have said they wouldn't consider being picked, she knows it would be political suicide to attach her name to his. In spite of her being attached to the Bush administration, she's one of the relatively sane members of the Republican party, which could give her a good shot at a good position in 2016 (Whether that be president, VP, or part of the cabinet somewhere). Riding with the derpfest crazytrain would be like shooting herself in the foot.
 
2012-06-26 11:26:18 AM  
And the world breathes a sigh of relief....

teachdylan.files.wordpress.com

www.texansforpeace.org
 
2012-06-26 11:28:26 AM  
Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.
 
2012-06-26 11:30:53 AM  

carrion_luggage: Right, she has no interest.
Unequivocal about it too.
But people keep floating her name.
I don't get it.
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.


For those who didn't get it on first glance. And I don't see any way Rubio is picked. The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has, if not even less since he has been working in government since the time he graduated from law school whereas Obama served as a private civil rights attorney for a number of years.
 
2012-06-26 11:31:42 AM  

carrion_luggage: Don't Troll Me Bro!: carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

And who might that be?

R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.


Even if he is the pick, it won't have the desired effect (getting more Latinos to vote for Money).
 
2012-06-26 11:36:34 AM  

Serious Black: The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has


Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?
 
2012-06-26 11:37:14 AM  
There are many signs that Willard is in trouble. The fact that a poorly regarded failed bureaucrat who has consistently rejected all attempts to be drawn into elective office has specified that she isn't interested in running as his VP is not one of them. The last thing Willard needs to do is associate himself with the Bush legacy.
 
2012-06-26 11:37:33 AM  

thornhill: Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.


The VP and VP candidates of late have mostly been career legislators with no real chance at the presidency and no history of major aspirations towards it, Senators for decades and the like. I don't think Hillary would want to be Obama's VP if asked, either(and perhaps she was before it was given to Biden, I don't know). I don't think any presidential candidate wants to choose someone who has real aspirations to the office after they leave as it means, among other things, they'll be forced to question the president on policy that they don't agree with or would be negative towards their own candidacy, particularly in the sitting president's second term where they do not have to worry about being elected again(which is where Obama, if reelected, will push hard on much of his more divisive agenda items, and, since Biden has no presidential future, will not have to worry about support within his office).
 
2012-06-26 11:37:50 AM  
Didn't she already turn it down back in April?
 
2012-06-26 11:38:45 AM  

salvador.hardin: There are many signs that Willard is in trouble. The fact that a poorly regarded failed bureaucrat who has consistently rejected all attempts to be drawn into elective office has specified that she isn't interested in running as his VP is not one of them. The last thing Willard needs to do is further associate himself with the Bush legacy.


He's already got Bush's foreign policy and economic teams. Why not pick up his former NSA and Secretary of State as Vice President?
 
2012-06-26 11:39:38 AM  

Khellendros: Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?


Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

/oh noes, your political party is full of hypocrites
//welcome to every political party
 
2012-06-26 11:39:45 AM  
Well, that pretty definitively answers my question from yesterday's Romney retreat thread.

Who is still around to fill the VP slot? I think Paul Ryan or Rand Paul are about the only two legitimate people who might still be in the running and have a shot with the Republican base.
 
2012-06-26 11:40:45 AM  

Sock Ruh Tease: Even if he is the pick, it won't have the desired effect (getting more Latinos to vote for Money).


Best case scenario is Rubio attracts some Lats with his (relatively) moderate stances on immigration reform, maybe even a Blue Dog or two that's disappointed in Obama and swayed by the AGREE Act. But you still have a substantial piece of your constituency that is wildly xenophobic and will perceive Rubio's appointment as VP as another furriner taking an American job, and as someone who represents that phenomenon occurring across the country.

Not that people like that are gonna turn around and vote for Obama, obviously, but this is another scenario where Romney's decisions will break him even with his fractured base.
 
2012-06-26 11:41:21 AM  

Khellendros: Serious Black: The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has

Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?


Probably, but if the GOP isn't going to police their side, I'm damn sure going to do it for them.
 
2012-06-26 11:44:55 AM  

quizzical: Well, that pretty definitively answers my question from yesterday's Romney retreat thread.

Who is still around to fill the VP slot? I think Paul Ryan or Rand Paul are about the only two legitimate people who might still be in the running and have a shot with the Republican base.


The last VP poll I found showed adding Paul Ryan to the ticket would reduce Romney's vote by 2%. His budget plan is toxic to most of the country, especially when you explain that it would literally involve shutting down every function of the federal government besides the military and Medicare. As for Rand Paul, how the hell would Romney, a guy that has all but declared he would nuke Iran, handle a counterpart that believes war with Iran is unconscionable?
 
2012-06-26 11:46:55 AM  
It's hard to find someone to stand up with you when the likely result is public humiliation.
 
2012-06-26 11:47:22 AM  
Romneybot 2012 doesn't have a chance. The GOP would be better off pulling money away from him and focusing on congress.

Also, Romney has almost all of Bush's neocon advisors.....I don't think anyone wants to deal with that sh@tstorm of an administration.
 
2012-06-26 11:48:02 AM  

bhcompy: Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?


No, Democrats criticized Palin for being incredibly, unbelievably retarded.
 
2012-06-26 11:48:09 AM  
carrion_luggage:

R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.

Good Stuff
 
2012-06-26 11:49:12 AM  

bhcompy: Khellendros: Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?

Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

/oh noes, your political party is full of hypocrites
//welcome to every political party


Democrats didn't criticize Palin for her inexperience, they criticized her because she was a farking idiot.

It's going to be Rubio or McDonnell, either of whom will give Rmoney a key swing state. Rubio would be preferable because he's a darling of the Teabaggers and would help to ensure they really get behind Rmoney.
 
2012-06-26 11:49:41 AM  

bhcompy: Khellendros: Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?

Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

/oh noes, your political party is full of hypocrites
//welcome to every political party


Wow, the giant piles of incorrect assumptions and illogical leaps you made about my intent and beliefs in those statements...

The point stands - Rubio will not be excluded on experiential grounds because Republicans accused Obama of having low experience four years ago. It won't even cross their minds. If they think he can rope in votes, and he'll take the job, they'll choose him. They're not going to exclude someone they think is a winner based off of a 4-year old talking point that was irrelevant when they made the claim.
 
2012-06-26 11:50:19 AM  

Serious Black: Khellendros: Serious Black: The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has

Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?

Probably, but if the GOP isn't going to police their side, I'm damn sure going to do it for them.


Fair enough.
 
2012-06-26 11:50:41 AM  
I'm willing to wager that whoever the running mate turns out to be will have at least professed no interest in the position or even stated unequivocally that they would turn it down.
 
2012-06-26 11:53:11 AM  

xxysyndrome: Condoleezza Rice: But I don't remember the al‐Qaida cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.
Richard Ben-Veniste: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB [Presidential Daily Briefing] warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?
Condoleezza Rice: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.

/historical document


img1-cdn.newser.com
 
2012-06-26 11:54:12 AM  
Latinos are not going to come out for Romney in big numbers unless he starts wearing a sombrero and picks Sofia Vergara as his VP.
 
2012-06-26 11:56:03 AM  

Freakman: Latinos are not going to come out for Romney in big numbers unless he starts wearing a sombrero and picks Sofia Vergara as his VP.


I'd like to put her on my ticket, if you know what I mean.
 
2012-06-26 11:58:52 AM  
Oh, fine. I'll do it.
 
2012-06-26 11:58:54 AM  

bhcompy: thornhill: Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.

The VP and VP candidates of late have mostly been career legislators with no real chance at the presidency and no history of major aspirations towards it, Senators for decades and the like. I don't think Hillary would want to be Obama's VP if asked, either(and perhaps she was before it was given to Biden, I don't know). I don't think any presidential candidate wants to choose someone who has real aspirations to the office after they leave as it means, among other things, they'll be forced to question the president on policy that they don't agree with or would be negative towards their own candidacy, particularly in the sitting president's second term where they do not have to worry about being elected again(which is where Obama, if reelected, will push hard on much of his more divisive agenda items, and, since Biden has no presidential future, will not have to worry about support within his office).


Totally disagree. Being VP is the best platform for running for President. Cheney is the only sitting VP since 1952 not to seek his Party's nomination and win it:

Gore: 2000
HW Bush: 1988
Humphrey: 1968
Nixon: 1960

Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

The advantage of being VP is 1) You keep your name in the press; 2) Get to do puffy popular things; 3) Take credit for everything positive the President did; 4) Not have vote on any contentiousness legislation so you have no recent vote record to be attacked on (unless there is a tie in the Senate); 6) When running for President make yourself out to be independent minded by criticizing everything unpopular your former boss did; and 6) Most obviously, unless you're a total screw up, you win the argument on being qualified to be president.
 
2012-06-26 11:59:14 AM  
At least she's till white and OJs black again.
 
2012-06-26 12:01:39 PM  

Serious Black: At this rate, the only person who will want to be Mitt Romney's VP is Mitt Romney.


Not likely. They'll never agree on anything.
 
2012-06-26 12:08:08 PM  

thornhill: bhcompy: thornhill: Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.

The VP and VP candidates of late have mostly been career legislators with no real chance at the presidency and no history of major aspirations towards it, Senators for decades and the like. I don't think Hillary would want to be Obama's VP if asked, either(and perhaps she was before it was given to Biden, I don't know). I don't think any presidential candidate wants to choose someone who has real aspirations to the office after they leave as it means, among other things, they'll be forced to question the president on policy that they don't agree with or would be negative towards their own candidacy, particularly in the sitting president's second term where they do not have to worry about being elected again(which is where Obama, if reelected, will push hard on much of his more divisive agenda items, and, since Biden has no presidential future, will not have to worry about support within his office).

Totally disagree. Being VP is the best platform for running for President. Cheney is the only sitting VP since 1952 not to seek his Party's nomination and win it:

Gore: 2000
HW Bush: 1988
Humphrey: 1968
Nixon: 1960

Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

The advantage of being VP is 1) You keep your name in the press; 2) Get to do puffy popular things; 3) Take credit for everything positive the President did; 4) Not have vote on any contentiousness legislation so you have no recent vote record to be attacked on (unless there is a tie in the Senate); 6) When running for President make yourself out to be independent minded by criticizing everything unpopular your former boss did; and 6) Most obviously, unless you're a total screw up, you win the argument on being qualified to be president.


Its a long ticket to a single term. Only Jefferson, T. Roosevelt, and Nixon have gone from VP to win two presidential elections (and Nixon lost his first attempt). I think the Cheney model, the experienced elder, is going to be the standard for a while. It makes more sense than the stepping stone model.
 
2012-06-26 12:08:38 PM  
Was hoping for a condi pics thread. Leaving disappoint
 
2012-06-26 12:08:42 PM  
Well in her defense, I think she's still pretty tied up looking for those WMDs in Iraq.
 
2012-06-26 12:09:18 PM  

NeoCortex42: Serious Black: At this rate, the only person who will want to be Mitt Romney's VP is Mitt Romney.

Not likely. They'll never agree on anything.


golf clap
 
2012-06-26 12:11:52 PM  

thornhill: bhcompy: thornhill: Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.

The VP and VP candidates of late have mostly been career legislators with no real chance at the presidency and no history of major aspirations towards it, Senators for decades and the like. I don't think Hillary would want to be Obama's VP if asked, either(and perhaps she was before it was given to Biden, I don't know). I don't think any presidential candidate wants to choose someone who has real aspirations to the office after they leave as it means, among other things, they'll be forced to question the president on policy that they don't agree with or would be negative towards their own candidacy, particularly in the sitting president's second term where they do not have to worry about being elected again(which is where Obama, if reelected, will push hard on much of his more divisive agenda items, and, since Biden has no presidential future, will not have to worry about support within his office).

Totally disagree. Being VP is the best platform for running for President. Cheney is the only sitting VP since 1952 not to seek his Party's nomination and win it:

Gore: 2000
HW Bush: 1988
Humphrey: 1968
Nixon: 1960

Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

The advantage of being VP is 1) You keep your name in the press; 2) Get to do puffy popular things; 3) Take credit for everything positive the President did; 4) Not have vote on any contentiousness legislation so you have no recent vote record to be attacked on (unless there is a tie in the Senate); 6) When running for President make yourself out to be independent minded by criticizing everything unpopular your former boss did; and 6) Most obviously, unless you'r ...


Not going to have to worry about ties in the Senate ever again. The revamped filibuster has seen to that.
 
2012-06-26 12:12:26 PM  

thornhill: Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.


Dear god, the idea of Biden running on the top of a ticket scares me. I hope so much that Mark Warner finally bites the bullet and enters the race for 2016.
 
2012-06-26 12:15:54 PM  
Nice job subtroll.

When quoting someone (you know, using quotation marks) in the non-troll world you put exactly what they said.

Let me help you:

Rice said, "I didn't run for student council president. I don't see myself in any way in elective office."

Rice also said, "there is no way that I will do this because it's really not me. I know my strengths and weaknesses." She said Romney will pick a strong running mate and she'll support the ticket.

Not your made up:

Condoleeza Rice. "There's no way I'd be Romney's VP"

5/10 because I bit.
 
2012-06-26 12:16:07 PM  

Serious Black: At this rate, the only person who will want to be Mitt Romney's VP is Mitt Romney.


It would be refreshing to have a VP not afraid to voice opinions that differ dramatically from the President. The conversations could be very constructive towards reaching good solutions to some tough problems.
 
2012-06-26 12:17:40 PM  

Supes: thornhill: Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

Dear god, the idea of Biden running on the top of a ticket scares me. I hope so much that Mark Warner finally bites the bullet and enters the race for 2016.


Hickenlooper!
 
2012-06-26 12:18:25 PM  

MilesTeg: Nice job subtroll.

When quoting someone (you know, using quotation marks) in the non-troll world you put exactly what they said.

Let me help you:

Rice said, "I didn't run for student council president. I don't see myself in any way in elective office."

Rice also said, "there is no way that I will do this because it's really not me. I know my strengths and weaknesses." She said Romney will pick a strong running mate and she'll support the ticket.

Not your made up:

Condoleeza Rice. "There's no way I'd be Romney's VP"

5/10 because I bit.


So, in your mind, "there is no way I'd do this" is somehow different from "there's no way I'd be Romney's VP"?
 
2012-06-26 12:21:06 PM  
As the room slowly empties out, the twangy female voice at the back of the room gets louder and louder, "Mitt! Hey, Miiiiitt!! I won't tank you like I did McCain!! Miiiiiiiiiiiiitt!!!!!"
 
2012-06-26 12:22:39 PM  

bhcompy: Khellendros: Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?

Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

/oh noes, your political party is full of hypocrites
//welcome to every political party


No, Democrats criticized Palin for being an idiot.
 
2012-06-26 12:23:45 PM  

thornhill: bhcompy: thornhill: Yawn. Everyone always says they have zero interest. No one wants to come out and say they'd want to be VP or at the least would do it if asked, only to be never asked.

The VP and VP candidates of late have mostly been career legislators with no real chance at the presidency and no history of major aspirations towards it, Senators for decades and the like. I don't think Hillary would want to be Obama's VP if asked, either(and perhaps she was before it was given to Biden, I don't know). I don't think any presidential candidate wants to choose someone who has real aspirations to the office after they leave as it means, among other things, they'll be forced to question the president on policy that they don't agree with or would be negative towards their own candidacy, particularly in the sitting president's second term where they do not have to worry about being elected again(which is where Obama, if reelected, will push hard on much of his more divisive agenda items, and, since Biden has no presidential future, will not have to worry about support within his office).

Totally disagree. Being VP is the best platform for running for President. Cheney is the only sitting VP since 1952 not to seek his Party's nomination and win it:

Gore: 2000
HW Bush: 1988
Humphrey: 1968
Nixon: 1960

Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

The advantage of being VP is 1) You keep your name in the press; 2) Get to do puffy popular things; 3) Take credit for everything positive the President did; 4) Not have vote on any contentiousness legislation so you have no recent vote record to be attacked on (unless there is a tie in the Senate); 6) When running for President make yourself out to be independent minded by criticizing everything unpopular your former boss did; and 6) Most obviously, unless you'r ...


Biden/Kucinich 2016! Woot!

I think I'll start my letter writing campaign today.
 
2012-06-26 12:23:50 PM  

Snatch Bandergrip: Sock Ruh Tease: Even if he is the pick, it won't have the desired effect (getting more Latinos to vote for Money).

Best case scenario is Rubio attracts some Lats with his (relatively) moderate stances on immigration reform, maybe even a Blue Dog or two that's disappointed in Obama and swayed by the AGREE Act. But you still have a substantial piece of your constituency that is wildly xenophobic and will perceive Rubio's appointment as VP as another furriner taking an American job, and as someone who represents that phenomenon occurring across the country.

Not that people like that are gonna turn around and vote for Obama, obviously, but this is another scenario where Romney's decisions will break him even with his fractured base.


The real muscle in this election.
 
2012-06-26 12:24:08 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: bhcompy: Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

No, Democrats criticized Palin for being incredibly, unbelievably retarded.


No, I'm pretty sure it was experience.

NY Times : Democrats and at least some shocked Republicans questioned the judgment of Mr. McCain, who has said repeatedly on the campaign trail that his running mate should have the qualifications to immediately step into the role of commander in chief.

....

Mr. Obama's fellow Democrats were considerably less welcoming, and most said they were flabbergasted by what they characterized as a desperate, cynical or dangerous choice, given Ms. Palin's lack of any experience in national security.

"On his 72nd birthday, this is the guy's judgment of who he wants one heartbeat from the presidency?" said Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, who said the selection smacked of political panic. "Please."


Washington Post : Michael Feldman(Sr Advisor to Gore): McCain wants and needs a game-changer -- someone who can transform the race and appeal to women who feel disenfranchised by the Democratic primary results. But he couldn't go with his first choice, Joe Lieberman, because it would have caused a revolt within his Republican base.

Instead, he has decided to put the former part-time mayor of a town of fewer than 9,000, with zero foreign policy experience, a heartbeat away from the presidency, undermining one of his central campaign messages -- experience.

....

John Podesta(Clinton Chief of Staff) : A potential vice president with the ideology of Dick Cheney and fewer qualifications than Dan Quayle should send arctic shivers up our spines.

Vice presidents matter. In our history, nine have become president when the sitting commander in chief unexpectedly died or resigned. McCain, a 72-year-old cancer survivor, may be rolling the dice to grab a chunk of Hillary Clinton's voters, but he is asking all of us to gamble on Sarah Palin if she were to become president at a time of national crisis.

McCain himself said this spring: "In all due respect he does not understand . . . the fundamental elements of national security and warfare." He could have been discussing his running mate. The former mayor of Wasilla, population 8,471, has no national security experience. She has been governor only two years. And her instincts on domestic and security policy are troubling.


etc
 
2012-06-26 12:26:20 PM  

Supes: thornhill: Biden has made clear that he's still interested in running for President, and that's no doubt why he gave up his seniority in the Senate to become VP. Had Clinton been asked in 2008 she too would have done it.

Dear god, the idea of Biden running on the top of a ticket scares me. I hope so much that Mark Warner finally bites the bullet and enters the race for 2016.


All eyes are going to be on Clinton. She's going out of Secretary of State on a very high note -- she's probably the most popular public figure at the moment.

If she doesn't run, I say Cuomo is the likely nominee.
 
2012-06-26 12:29:13 PM  

bhcompy: Instead, he has decided to put the former part-time mayor of a town of fewer than 9,000, with zero foreign policy experience, a heartbeat away from the presidency, undermining one of his central campaign messages -- experience.


Highlighted the relevant portion for you. They weren't criticizing Palin for her lack of experience per se, they were criticizing McCain for making his campaign all about experience, incessantly criticizing Obama for his lack of experience, and then selecting a running mate with no experience to speak of. There were some direct criticisms of Palin there ("And her instincts on domestic and security policy are troubling."), but the experience bit was directed more at McCain's hypocrisy than anything.
 
2012-06-26 12:38:57 PM  
I'm going with Paul Ryan
 
2012-06-26 12:40:18 PM  

DirkValentine: I'm going with Paul Ryan


Are you going steady?
 
2012-06-26 12:48:56 PM  

Philip Francis Queeg: DirkValentine: I'm going with Paul Ryan

Are you going steady?


*blush!*
 
2012-06-26 12:49:35 PM  

qorkfiend: Hickenlooper!


Not sharin' with the rest of the country. We're keeping him here.
 
2012-06-26 12:56:17 PM  

DirkValentine: I'm going with Paul Ryan


Sure, go with that if you want the federal government to become a giant insurance company with a military.
 
2012-06-26 12:58:53 PM  
3.bp.blogspot.com

"Oh no, I insist, you deserve Vice President far more than I."
 
2012-06-26 01:04:02 PM  

Serious Black: DirkValentine: I'm going with Paul Ryan

Sure, go with that if you want the federal government to become a giant insurance company with a military.


I don't want that arrogant dickhead anywhere near his congressional seat, much less as VP.
 
2012-06-26 01:37:37 PM  
There are dozens of Republicans in reasonably-high elected positions who would wade through an outhouse vault for a VP nod. I'm quite sure my own governor (Brownback, KS) would.

The problem is that these guys are guys who would be pretty happy with a loss, since they'd be prime GOP candidate #1 for a 2016 bid. Like Edwards with Kerry... you were never quite sure the VP candidate really wanted to be VP.
 
2012-06-26 01:46:06 PM  

Lawnchair: There are dozens of Republicans in reasonably-high elected positions who would wade through an outhouse vault for a VP nod. I'm quite sure my own governor (Brownback, KS) would.

The problem is that these guys are guys who would be pretty happy with a loss, since they'd be prime GOP candidate #1 for a 2016 bid. Like Edwards with Kerry... you were never quite sure the VP candidate really wanted to be VP.


You really think Brownback would go from having full executive power over a state that is starting to resemble a Christian Pakistan to having minimal power over a country that is closely divided between liberals and conservatives? I don't know...he seems to be a power-hungry asswipe.
 
2012-06-26 01:51:55 PM  

MilesTeg: Nice job subtroll.

When quoting someone (you know, using quotation marks) in the non-troll world you put exactly what they said.

Let me help you:

Rice said, "I didn't run for student council president. I don't see myself in any way in elective office."

Rice also said, "there is no way that I will do this because it's really not me. I know my strengths and weaknesses." She said Romney will pick a strong running mate and she'll support the ticket.

Not your made up:

Condoleeza Rice. "There's no way I'd be Romney's VP"

5/10 because I bit.


You must be new.
 
2012-06-26 01:57:53 PM  
I find it amusing that the all the haters out there are wasting their time dumping on VP picks that are not going to happen. Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?), he's not going to pick someone too controversial or too young and he needs someone who knows how Washington works. Look for him to pick a current or former Senator with executive experience. I'm guessing the person would need to be at least 55 years old and probably from a swing state. He's nothing if not careful.
 
2012-06-26 02:04:13 PM  

Serious Black: You really think Brownback would go from having full executive power over a state that is starting to resemble a Christian Pakistan to having minimal power over a country that is closely divided between liberals and conservatives? I don't know...he seems to be a power-hungry asswipe.


I do. He's not dumb enough to believe the whole "massive tax cuts for the Kochs will pay for themselves if we pencil in a 10% y-o-y growth rate into the future... which will surely happen if we cut taxes". I think getting out before the s*** hits is the way to go, power or not.

And, hey, bailing on a second-term-run doesn't seem to have killed Romney (although, Romney was likely to lose in MA... Brownback would win a second term because there isn't a single Kansas Democrat besides Sebelius with 10% name recognition in the state... and that includes the 2010 nominee).
 
2012-06-26 02:05:44 PM  

carrion_luggage: Don't Troll Me Bro!: carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

And who might that be?

R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.


Who the hell is Gedss?
 
2012-06-26 02:09:08 PM  

farkityfarker: I'm willing to wager that whoever the running mate turns out to be will have at least professed no interest in the position or even stated unequivocally that they would turn it down.


True. I believe that is called the "I really shouldn't have a piece of cake" factor.

Of course, in this case some of the people really don't want the farking cake.
 
2012-06-26 02:14:34 PM  

tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)


No one. They could stay home, vote for a third party candidate, destroy their ballot, right in a candidate.

The race is close enough that it cold be won solely on turn-out. Maybe Obama's community organization skills will be useful afterall.
 
2012-06-26 02:19:45 PM  

bhcompy: NY Times : Democrats and at least some shocked Republicans questioned the judgment of Mr. McCain, who has said repeatedly on the campaign trail that his running mate should have the qualifications to immediately step into the role of commander in chief.


Qualifications does not necessarily equal experience.

bhcompy: Mr. Obama's fellow Democrats were considerably less welcoming, and most said they were flabbergasted by what they characterized as a desperate, cynical or dangerous choice, given Ms. Palin's lack of any experience in national security.


This is a specific qualification which Mrs. Palin unequivocally did not have. Remember the "When Putin rears his head he comes to Alaska" bit? Meanwhile, Obama sat on the Senate Foreign Relations committee.

bhcompy: Instead, he has decided to put the former part-time mayor of a town of fewer than 9,000, with zero foreign policy experience, a heartbeat away from the presidency, undermining one of his central campaign messages -- experience.


Again, this is a specific qualification that Palin did not have that Obama did have - foreign policy.

bhcompy: McCain himself said this spring: "In all due respect he does not understand . . . the fundamental elements of national security and warfare." He could have been discussing his running mate. The former mayor of Wasilla, population 8,471, has no national security experience. She has been governor only two years. And her instincts on domestic and security policy are troubling.


Yet a third person who stated, correctly, that Sarah Palin did not have foreign-policy experience that Obama did have.

But thanks for proving my point for me. It was so nice of you to do all that research.
 
2012-06-26 02:20:48 PM  

mrshowrules: tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)

No one. They could stay home, vote for a third party candidate, destroy their ballot, right in a candidate.

The race is close enough that it cold be won solely on turn-out. Maybe Obama's community organization skills will be useful afterall.


Standing by my previous prediction, this election will not be close.
 
2012-06-26 02:22:23 PM  

vernonFL: Gotta make a move to a town thats right for me

Gotta keep a herpin and a derpin with the energy

Well I lie about it lie about it lie about it lie about it

Lie about lie about lie about everything.

Won't you take me to

Romneytown

Won't you take me to

Romneytown.


karshwrites.com
 
2012-06-26 02:24:52 PM  
It won't be Rubio--he's a former Mormon. You don't want two Mormons on the same ticket. Dr. Rice needs no additional cred or training to run on her own. She was already Sec of State. If she wants to run on her own she will.
 
2012-06-26 02:26:03 PM  

Somacandra: It won't be Rubio--he's a former Mormon. You don't want two Mormons on the same ticket. Dr. Rice needs no additional cred or training to run on her own. She was already Sec of State. If she wants to run on her own she will.


She won't ever run for office because she's a "single" black woman in the Republican party. The primary alone would destroy her.
 
2012-06-26 02:28:54 PM  
I know its been bandied about before on Fark, but I agree with Dr. Paul Begala, its going to be Senator Rob Portman. You need a safe, white, technocratic choice that will not overshadow Romney. An anti-Palin, if you will.
 
2012-06-26 02:33:08 PM  

cameroncrazy1984: Qualifications does not necessarily equal experience.


Clause 5: Qualifications for office

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

I'm pretty sure she meets the qualifications. What she didn't meet was the job experience people expect you to have.
 
2012-06-26 02:39:02 PM  

tcan: mrshowrules: tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)

No one. They could stay home, vote for a third party candidate, destroy their ballot, right in a candidate.

The race is close enough that it cold be won solely on turn-out. Maybe Obama's community organization skills will be useful afterall.

Standing by my previous prediction, this election will not be close.


I agree, Obama will beat Romney just as soundly as he beat McCain.
 
2012-06-26 02:44:25 PM  

bhcompy: I'm pretty sure she meets the qualifications. What she didn't meet was the job experience people expect you to have.


While that is correct, the criticisms of her experience that you posted were not for the same reasons the Republicans attacked Obama.
 
2012-06-26 02:45:23 PM  
Maybe Romney will find some obscure rule that says he doesn't have to have a VP, he'll run on his own and for some reason Republicans will have no problem with this whatsoever.
 
2012-06-26 02:49:14 PM  

mrshowrules: tcan: mrshowrules: tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)

No one. They could stay home, vote for a third party candidate, destroy their ballot, right in a candidate.

The race is close enough that it cold be won solely on turn-out. Maybe Obama's community organization skills will be useful afterall.

Standing by my previous prediction, this election will not be close.

I agree, Obama will beat Romney just as soundly as he beat McCain.


Whatever helps you get through the day ;)
 
2012-06-26 02:54:54 PM  
She later criticized Obama's foreign policy and called for a more "assertive" America.

Yeah, you sure showed him how it's done with the surgical strikes in Iraq & Afghanistan versus the clusterfark of a decade-long quagmire in Libya.
 
2012-06-26 02:55:02 PM  

tcan: mrshowrules: tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)

No one. They could stay home, vote for a third party candidate, destroy their ballot, right in a candidate.

The race is close enough that it cold be won solely on turn-out. Maybe Obama's community organization skills will be useful afterall.

Standing by my previous prediction, this election will not be close.


I think it's going to be a lot closer than many people think. There are enough people who vote right down the party line, that there will still be a significant number of people voting for Romney. Also, older people (who are more likely to be republican) are much more reliable when it comes to voting than the young people that tend to vote democrat.
 
2012-06-26 03:20:17 PM  
She's pro choice. Non-starter.

Meanwhile, AFAIK, Paul Ryan is the only person that has turned over documentation to Romney's people for vetting. So I'd put my money on him for now.
 
2012-06-26 03:25:57 PM  

Lawnchair: Serious Black: You really think Brownback would go from having full executive power over a state that is starting to resemble a Christian Pakistan to having minimal power over a country that is closely divided between liberals and conservatives? I don't know...he seems to be a power-hungry asswipe.

I do. He's not dumb enough to believe the whole "massive tax cuts for the Kochs will pay for themselves if we pencil in a 10% y-o-y growth rate into the future... which will surely happen if we cut taxes". I think getting out before the s*** hits is the way to go, power or not.

And, hey, bailing on a second-term-run doesn't seem to have killed Romney (although, Romney was likely to lose in MA... Brownback would win a second term because there isn't a single Kansas Democrat besides Sebelius with 10% name recognition in the state... and that includes the 2010 nominee).


You give him a hell of a lot more credit than I do. And you're definitely right that the GOP has the governor's office basically sewn up with the lack of prominent Democrats in the state. Some days, I wish that we could just nuke the entire state from orbit.
 
2012-06-26 03:37:38 PM  
Not sure if someone brought it up or if it actually exists but is there a campaign ad yet just showing all the people running away from the VP slot?
 
2012-06-26 03:40:54 PM  

mrshowrules: Not sure if someone brought it up or if it actually exists but is there a campaign ad yet just showing all the people running away from the VP slot?


I think it would have to be a feature-length movie rather than a 30-second TV ad at this point.
 
2012-06-26 03:55:49 PM  
Just for the record I don't want it either. That way when he doesn't pick me I can say it was my choice. You have to laugh when people not even being considered say they don't want it. A political ego is a delicate thing.
 
2012-06-26 03:56:04 PM  
The main problem with Rubio is that, just like Rice, he has stated over and over again that he's not interested in being the VP. The polite thing for Rubio, or Rice, to say would be, "I'm sure there are people more suited to that important job than me, but if Candidate Romney calls, I'll answer." Not "I'm not interested and will not run."
 
2012-06-26 04:05:38 PM  

mrshowrules: carrion_luggage: Don't Troll Me Bro!: carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

And who might that be?

R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.

Who the hell is Gedss?


RIP G.E.D.'s

newspaper.li
 
2012-06-26 04:47:16 PM  

tcan: I find it amusing that the all the haters out there are wasting their time dumping on VP picks that are not going to happen. Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?), he's not going to pick someone too controversial or too young and he needs someone who knows how Washington works. Look for him to pick a current or former Senator with executive experience. I'm guessing the person would need to be at least 55 years old and probably from a swing state. He's nothing if not careful.


lol arent you a Bush supporter?

I bet you and Glenn Beck are using the same electoral map.

Good luck with that.
 
2012-06-26 05:02:08 PM  

tcan: Romney doesn't need to shore up the conservative base(who else will they vote for?)


No one. That's the problem. He has to shore up the conservative vote because right now many of them will just stay home. They won't care if there's not someone on the ballot that makes them want to get up and go the polls. Right now, conservatives have a lukewarm Republican from a blue state who occasionally stands for their values when it suits him, and never with any conviction.

Romney is vanilla ice cream. People aren't going to care if you add a glass of tepid water on the side. On the other hand, he can't add a jalapenos and a bottle of Tabasco, either. If he chooses poorly, it could a) add nothing and leave registered Republicans at all-time low participation, or b) overshadow him and detract from a message, causing controversy and loss of faith in the ticket.

This is NOT an easy choice, because the candidate is fairly weak.
 
2012-06-26 05:46:47 PM  
www4.pictures.gi.zimbio.com

RICE: We were not presented with a plan.

BOB KERREY, FORMER U.S. SENATOR: Well, that's not true. It is not...

RICE: We were not presented. We were presented with...

KERREY: I've heard you say that, Dr. Clarke, that 25 January, 2001, memo was declassified, I don't believe...

RICE: That January 25 memo has a series of actionable items having to do with Afghanistan, the Northern Alliance.


How do they keep getting away with this shiat and still have careers?
 
2012-06-26 06:17:31 PM  

Sock Ruh Tease: carrion_luggage: Don't Troll Me Bro!: carrion_luggage: Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

And who might that be?

R U kidding?
Unless you're
Blind,
It's
Obvious.

Even if he is the pick, it won't have the desired effect (getting more Latinos to vote for Money).


He's a HINO?
 
2012-06-26 07:01:22 PM  
Pro-choice black woman who is rumored to be a lesbian?

Wanna see Texas go blue? Put her on the ticket just to see what happens. The right wing bigots might have held their noses and voted for the Mormon but voting for the Mormon/Negress ticket? Yeah, that's not gonna happen.
 
2012-06-26 08:29:40 PM  
There was this one really hot shopped pic of her as a dominatrix in like Maxim or FHM a few years ago that I came here to see and am leaving disappoint
 
2012-06-26 09:17:29 PM  
images.wikia.com
Dayummm crazy crackers
 
2012-06-26 10:57:39 PM  

xxysyndrome: Condoleezza Rice: But I don't remember the al‐Qaida cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.
Richard Ben-Veniste: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB [Presidential Daily Briefing] warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?
Condoleezza Rice: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.

/historical document


If you knew there were terrorist cells in your own country why would you need to be told that you needed to do something about them? There weren't in the US for a nice vacation after all.
 
2012-06-26 10:59:28 PM  

Serious Black: carrion_luggage: Right, she has no interest.
Unequivocal about it too.
But people keep floating her name.
I don't get it.
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

For those who didn't get it on first glance. And I don't see any way Rubio is picked. The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has, if not even less since he has been working in government since the time he graduated from law school whereas Obama served as a private civil rights attorney for a number of years.


That's actually a very strange criticism. Any new president has no experience at being president.
 
2012-06-26 11:02:09 PM  

bhcompy: Khellendros: Wait, you're expecting Republicans to put the same measures on their own candidates as they do to Obama? Are you farking high?

Because Democrats didn't criticize Palin for the same?

/oh noes, your political party is full of hypocrites
//welcome to every political party


Democrats criticize Palin for the outrageously stupid things she says.
 
2012-06-26 11:06:54 PM  

kg2095: Serious Black: carrion_luggage: Right, she has no interest.
Unequivocal about it too.
But people keep floating her name.
I don't get it.
Oh well, we all know who it's going to be.

For those who didn't get it on first glance. And I don't see any way Rubio is picked. The big complaint against Obama is that he was inexperienced and in over his head as President. Rubio has essentially the same amount of experience that Obama has, if not even less since he has been working in government since the time he graduated from law school whereas Obama served as a private civil rights attorney for a number of years.

That's actually a very strange criticism. Any new president has no experience at being president.


We should only be electing people with presidential experience and not all these lawyers and ex-governors and shiat. Only ex-presidents should be allowed to run for president.
 
2012-06-27 12:51:19 AM  
I dislike Romney and would not vote for him, but if Dr. Rice is his VP, I will happily volunteer to work for the campaign.
 
2012-06-27 01:47:43 AM  
FTA: Host Charlie Rose asked Rice how Romney's foreign policy would be different than President Barack Obama's. She declined to say specifically

She worked for W for 8 years and even she thinks Romney is a 0.
 
2012-06-27 08:03:03 PM  
He would NEVER pick her in a MEEEELLION YEARS.

She's much too interesting for his ticket. Can't be upstaged by the veep... which will prove difficult for him.

/chooses Milky McMilquetoast as VP
 
Displayed 103 of 103 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report