If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MassLive)   Fewer people are contesting traffic tickets since Massachusetts started charging a fee to plead not guilty   (masslive.com) divider line 4
    More: Obvious, Massachusetts, Registry of Motor Vehicles, Supreme Judicial Court, small claims court, fees, Insurance Board of Appeals, trial courts  
•       •       •

8259 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Jun 2012 at 10:03 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-06-24 11:11:25 AM
1 votes:
Hey, if you wanted to be able to plead not guilty, you should have been born to wealthier parents. What makes you think you deserved to be treated as equal under the law, peon?
2012-06-24 09:30:04 AM
1 votes:
This is what happens when people start saying all taxes are bad - you get ridiculous fees everywhere. The anti-tax tards don't biatch about those, especially when attached to the court system. Everything has to be paid for somehow.

So, I'm curious. Is paying for court costs on a ticket, even if the officer doesn't show up and the charge is dismissed, normal everywhere?
2012-06-24 09:06:40 AM
1 votes:

EvilEgg: I didn't read the article, but do you get your money back if you are actually found not guilty?


For a New Englander, you don't seem to understand a lot about Massachusetts
2012-06-24 08:25:08 AM
1 votes:
Last year, the court ruled that the fees were justified even if a motorist was found innocent of the ticketed offense.

That's the best part.
 
Displayed 4 of 4 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report