If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Buzzfeed)   You remember that Anti-Obama painter? Well, he's at it again, and here is his latest masterpiece   (buzzfeed.com) divider line 649
    More: Stupid, President Obama, art world, Thomas Kinkade, Jon McNaughton, U.S. Constitution, Sean Hannity  
•       •       •

14102 clicks; posted to Politics » on 23 Jun 2012 at 6:00 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



649 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-06-23 11:36:38 PM

Jim_Callahan: I don't have a personal hatred for the guy or anything, but he was authoritarian to the verge of nearly turning the half of the country he controlled into a military Junta and a number of his decisions were borderline incompetent at best.



Yeah, the nerve of that guy for reacting to the Confederacy taking up arms against the Constitution and the states.
 
2012-06-23 11:36:55 PM
I've finally figured out who the Empowered Man looks like, and it's terrifying.

www1.pictures.zimbio.com
 
2012-06-23 11:37:57 PM
img.photobucket.com
 
2012-06-23 11:38:39 PM

Jim_Callahan: Sadly, I made the mistake of studying real history 'n shiat


So you're one of them edgucated libural elitists then? Why you hate Murika, whie?
 
2012-06-23 11:39:50 PM
I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

ttoes.files.wordpress.com

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc
 
2012-06-23 11:40:48 PM

verbaltoxin: King Something: runcible spork: King Something: Jonathan Hohensee:

[snipped]

Bravo to you for taking even a short amount of time to respond to that [bait?]!

Also, that democratic filibuster-proof majority was in the first six months of the administration, when it would have been unseemly and impolitic to ram through partisan legislation.

/ I wonder if the Cash-for-Clunkers had any effect on overall automobile emissions?

Actually it was the second six months, not the first. Norm Coleman kept appealing the recount to keep Al Franken out of the Senate until July 2009, Ted Kennedy died a month later, and his temporary replacement was only in office until Scott Brown defeated that Yankees fan who phoned in her campaign.

And even then, Joe Lieberman and the blue dog Democrats were part of their delegation of 60.

People who complain about nothing getting done during the very brief Democratic super-majority are either willfully ignorant or don't understand how the Democrats are not a unified party like the Republicans.


Hence my mentioning of Lieberman and the blue dogs.

The Democrats would need to have something like 67 seats in order to be able to get the 60 votes necessary to allow their bills to come up for an up-or-down vote. Which means that unless the Democrats retake the House, sweep the Senate side of the election and Obama wins reelection, there's still gonna be some partisan gridlock until at least 2014.

/at least Lieberman's not running for reelection
//he got kicked out of the party he founded when he got primaried by the Democrats in either 2006 or 2000
 
2012-06-23 11:42:12 PM

Don't Troll Me Bro!: runcible spork: Also, even without factoring in the Independents, as a general rule there's too much diversity (especially including red (?) dog (blue-dog?) democrats) for them to ever vote in lockstep fashion.

I had this discussion with some people. One of the key factors that makes it easier to get lockstep from the GOP these days is that all they want to do is NOTHING. When you're dealing with people that actually want to do something, but aren't completely in agreement on exactly how to do it, it shows up as not being on the same page.

Ex) 7 people at a house. "What should we do tonight?" one of them asks. Three say they don't want to do anything, two say they want to see a movie, and two say they want to go to a bar. Who wins the vote? The people that want to do nothing, even though the number of people that want to do something outnumber them 4-3.

And before some f*cking troll comes back with "durr, then the two that want to see the movie should see the movie, two go to the bar, and everyone happy duurrrr." it's just an example, and we can't do that with legislation.



Reminds me trying to get everyone to decide on a restaurant. Some people first claim "anything" then finally the vote comes up and they deny everything. They're future senators for sure.
 
2012-06-23 11:42:13 PM
"Sticking the Constitution up your butt does not make you an Empowered Man."

worthopedia.s3.amazonaws.com

/ kinky
 
2012-06-23 11:42:41 PM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


The one in TFA is mediocre at best, and certainly not iconic.
 
2012-06-23 11:43:40 PM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc



How is it any different? Well for starters it's not just an artistic representation of a candidate with his slogan.
 
2012-06-23 11:45:27 PM

Dalrint: Why is the guy from Silent Hill stealing the constitution?


You see that guy right behind The Constitution? Pyramid Head. That's why his face is covered.
 
2012-06-23 11:46:28 PM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.
 
2012-06-23 11:47:41 PM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc




Here's one:

Because one is explicitly campaign material, makes no pretensions to "art," and does not have confused and shaky ideological and philosophical symbolism.
 
2012-06-23 11:52:05 PM

gimmegimme: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.


You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.
 
2012-06-23 11:52:53 PM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


It's the same as the difference between a 99 cent hamburger from McDonald's and one of those 5-pound bacon and cheese smothered behemoth burgers from the place where the waitresses dress like nurses.
 
2012-06-23 11:54:18 PM

Great_Milenko: DamnYankees: Who the hell is that person to the right of Lincoln and Reagan? Is that supposed to be Washington? And who is that kneeling down? Pat Robertson in a wig?

All the answers ye seek are contained within

My favorite part is Calvin Coolidge.


Well that's just amazing. By which I mean I want to pull my eyes out.
 
2012-06-23 11:54:29 PM

Don't Troll Me Bro!: Jim_Callahan: Sadly, I made the mistake of studying real history 'n shiat

So you're one of them edgucated libural elitists then? Why you hate Murika, whie?



The correct spelling is "edjumicated."

Don't Troll Me Bro!:
I had this discussion with some people. One of the key factors that makes it easier to get lockstep from the GOP these days is that all they want to do is NOTHING. When you're dealing with people that actually want to do something, but aren't completely in agreement on exactly how to do it, it shows up as not being on the same page.

Ex) 7 people at a house. "What should we do tonight?" one of them asks. Three say they don't want to do anything, two say they want to see a movie, and two say they want to go to a bar. Who wins the vote? The people that want to do nothing, even though the number of people that want to do something outnumber them 4-3.

And before some f*cking troll comes back with "durr, then the two that want to see the movie should see the movie, two go to the bar, and everyone happy duurrrr." it's just an example, and we can't do that with legislation.


What kills me is that the Republicans (in government) are so arrogant as to tout their obstructionist agenda. No pretense whatsoever of cooperation, compromise, rational discussion, et cetera. And, by inference, intelligence. Perhaps it's effective and intelligent or clever in that respect, but it isn't "intelligent."
 
2012-06-23 11:54:35 PM

Death_Poot: You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.


So who are you voting for in the upcoming election?
 
2012-06-23 11:55:15 PM
"The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true"

This is true for both sides..................tell a lie often enough, and it will be believed. We on both sides are being played for fools.
 
2012-06-23 11:55:49 PM

Fluorescent Testicle: I've finally figured out who the Empowered Man looks like, and it's terrifying.

[www1.pictures.zimbio.com image 360x240]


O'Keefe looks more feminine, IMO...
i860.photobucket.com
 
2012-06-23 11:56:12 PM

Fluorescent Testicle: I've finally figured out who the Empowered Man looks like, and it's terrifying.


Smeagol?
 
2012-06-23 11:56:30 PM

verbaltoxin: People who complain about nothing getting done during the very brief Democratic super-majority are either willfully ignorant or don't understand how the Democrats are not a unified party like the Republicans


WHAT. But I've been assured by both trolls and idiots that it is the DEMONCRATS that are the unified party that brokes no dissent while the republcians are the big open tent that llows everyone and that anyone who says otherwise is a libtard or a phino.
 
2012-06-23 11:56:36 PM
That took two months to finish? I wonder how long he spent on her upper lip?
 
2012-06-23 11:56:42 PM

Ringshadow: Death_Poot: You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.

So who are you voting for in the upcoming election?


I honestly don't know, probably my cat.......
 
2012-06-23 11:57:12 PM

Death_Poot: gimmegimme: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.

You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.



Death_Poot, please pick one of the other responses to reply to. You know, one of those that actually addressed your request?
 
2012-06-23 11:58:51 PM
Why is Captan Kangaroo kneeling in that painting?
 
2012-06-23 11:58:58 PM

Death_Poot: Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.



Oh great, another Fark Independent "Both sides are bad" troll
 
2012-06-23 11:59:05 PM

Death_Poot: gimmegimme: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.

You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.


Democrats want to make out with your girlfriend. Republicans want to kidnap your mother and your wife in the middle of the night and sell them to a rich Middle Eastern sheik and strap you into a chair so they can force you to watch every step they take into sex slavery. All the while, Republicans are tossing softballs at your scrotum and force-feeding you deep-fried Snickers bars so they will get more entertainment out of chaining you to a treadmill that provides electricity to the fark machine your daughter is strapped into.

I'm going to go with the Democrats.
 
2012-06-24 12:00:08 AM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


It's like a fun contest. I'll give it a try:

One of them is a picture of a candidate and a one word slogan. The message seems to be "vote for Barack Obama for change."

The other is a picture of an everyman holding the Constitution in one hand, and a stack of money in the other hand, while some presidents stand behind him applauding, cheering, and praying, and other presidents recoil in horror and look down in shame. The message seems to be "Respect the Constitution and you'll make a lot of money while making the good presidents happy and making the bad presidents horrified and ashamed."

/9/10
 
2012-06-24 12:01:09 AM

runcible spork: Death_Poot: gimmegimme: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.

You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.

Death_Poot, please pick one of the other responses to reply to. You know, one of those that actually addressed your request?


I did specifically address his request. I will admit that I embellished a little because I'm getting the feeling that Death Poot doesn't read many opinions that conflict with his own.
 
2012-06-24 12:04:05 AM

Death_Poot: gimmegimme: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

This one is easy. The Republicans are hell-bent on dismantling the country and selling it to the highest bidder. For over a decade, they have subverted elections and continually disregarded the spirit of the representative republic we inherited.

The paintings in question are indicative of the kind of person who has never ever thought about anything ever and has never cracked a book and doesn't care whether or not what he believes is true. The Obama image is not evil, twisted propaganda that appeals to racists and the feeble-minded. It's an example of the simple and traditional "vote for me" imagery most candidates employ.

You're still talking from political perspective.....apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference

Also, regarding your first sentence, you are drinking the koolaid.....the D's and R's are both sides of the same coin....we are being played for suckers.


You didn't ask him to be non-political, bring those goalposts back
 
2012-06-24 12:07:19 AM

gimmegimme: runcible spork:

I did specifically address his request. I will admit that I embellished a little because I'm getting the feeling that Death Poot doesn't read many opinions that conflict with his own.



Sorry, I dispensed with subtlety to point out that D_P chose the only response (from quite a few) that made it somewhat easy to pick at. And he worked on it more than once, still ignoring the others.
 
2012-06-24 12:10:33 AM

runcible spork: gimmegimme: runcible spork:

I did specifically address his request. I will admit that I embellished a little because I'm getting the feeling that Death Poot doesn't read many opinions that conflict with his own.

Sorry, I dispensed with subtlety to point out that D_P chose the only response (from quite a few) that made it somewhat easy to pick at. And he worked on it more than once, still ignoring the others.


I'm sorry, too. I'm in an ornery mood. The many other responses to his exceedingly silly question were much more restrained and intelligent.

Hey, Death Poot. Why not respond to the others who rose to the challenge you issued?
 
2012-06-24 12:11:31 AM
Did anyone else explore the rest of his art? Lots of LDS stuff. As someone mentioned before or inferred it does seem as if he has some ADS going on, or perhaps, and since this IS the politics tab I will put it out there, some Romney Like Programing was involved. It has been mentioned time and time again that Romney's indifferent behavior is common with members of the LDS Church. By extension that would explain this guy, his art and his rather verbose explanations of his art as well as his answers to any perceived criticism that he may face regarding it. He claims that he has no political message and I believe that he honestly believes it in the same way that a blind person believes that the only color in the world is "darkness," that's what he has been led to believe all his life therefore it must be true, and anyone that doesn't believe the same, well there is something wrong with them.
 
2012-06-24 12:12:13 AM

Garble: AeAe: Why is the guy holding a big wad of cash? The Constitution on one hand and a big wad of cash in the other?


That escaped me too.

Because only wealthy people are the *real* Americans.

This was my best guess. ?
 
2012-06-24 12:17:42 AM

Fuggin Bizzy: Garble: AeAe: Why is the guy holding a big wad of cash? The Constitution on one hand and a big wad of cash in the other?

That escaped me too.

Because only wealthy people are the *real* Americans.

This was my best guess. ?


Maybe those were tips from the ex-Presidents around him?
 
2012-06-24 12:19:51 AM

Death_Poot: ...apart from the obama painting being adopted as a campaign tool, there is no difference.



If you honestly cannot discern a difference other than that between the two, then I'm afraid you lack subtlety in a variety of areas: formal expression, representation, composition, purpose, etc.

scruffy1: ... He claims that he has no political message and I believe that he honestly believes it in the same way that a blind person believes that the only color in the world is "darkness," that's what he has been led to believe all his life therefore it must be true, and anyone that doesn't believe the same, well there is something wrong with them.



C'mon, even a blind person with a smidgen on awareness is able to appreciate that just because they are physically unable to perceive something that is eminently provable doesn't mean that they can't accept its objective veracity. Unless... did you mean a blind person deprived of contact with sighted people?
 
2012-06-24 12:21:31 AM
So I posted on this douchebag's Facebook, telling him that he's like Norman Rockwell reborn...without any taste, grace or human decency. I suggest y'all take a moment to stop by his Facebook page and let him know what you think of his art as well.
 
2012-06-24 12:22:02 AM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


I love how conservatives like to perpetuate the myth that they're called racist for anything other than racism.
 
2012-06-24 12:23:56 AM

thatguyoverthere70: Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc

It's like a fun contest. I'll give it a try:

One of them is a picture of a candidate and a one word slogan. The message seems to be "vote for Barack Obama for change."

The other is a picture of an everyman holding the Constitution in one hand, and a stack of money in the other hand, while some presidents stand behind him applauding, cheering, and praying, and other presidents recoil in horror and look down in shame. The message seems to be "Respect the Constitution and you'll make a lot of money while making the good presidents happy and making the bad presidents horrified and ashamed."

/9/10


One is of Barack Obama and features his slogan. The other has a bunch of zombies factored in for some unfathomable reason.
 
2012-06-24 12:24:00 AM
Fark that stupid shiat...check out the Kate Upton jiggly bikini clips in the same article!!!
 
2012-06-24 12:29:58 AM

I Browse: My rebuttal:


[celebrity-photos.elliottback.com image 450x577]


Meh, there have been better (evoking Kennedy):

img171.imageshack.us

Still the same idea, though: ideals through bad art. Example 1:

img205.imageshack.us

For all the idiots glomming onto this guy's paintings, 50 million more looked at that and thought Obama was going to "change the world."

Idiots abound.
 
2012-06-24 12:31:40 AM
Man, Norman Rockwell really needs to stop snorting lines of pixie sticks and crushed cialis off Rush's flaccid cock.
 
2012-06-24 12:38:13 AM

skepticultist: So I posted on this douchebag's Facebook, telling him that he's like Norman Rockwell reborn...without any taste, grace or human decency. I suggest y'all take a moment to stop by his Facebook page and let him know what you think of his art as well.


You sure showed him.
 
2012-06-24 12:38:57 AM

Lsherm: I Browse: My rebuttal:


[celebrity-photos.elliottback.com image 450x577]

Meh, there have been better (evoking Kennedy):

[img171.imageshack.us image 509x639]

Still the same idea, though: ideals through bad art. Example 1:

[img205.imageshack.us image 300x449]

For all the idiots glomming onto this guy's paintings, 50 million more looked at that and thought Obama was going to "change the world."

Idiots abound.


Imagine what could happen if Republicans ditched their literal and stated goal of preventing the President from improving the country and economy!

I'm not kidding....they literally put money and politics over the country they claim to care about but clearly don't.
 
2012-06-24 12:40:51 AM
King Something: Most of the people who oppose "Obamacare" only oppose the "Obama" part and are in favor of its provisions, such as being able to keep your kids on your health plan until they turn 26 and not having coverage deined due to pre-existing conditions.



Bears repeating. IIRC way back when this cut-off-nose-to-spite-face backlash started erupting, there was a poll where people were asked one by one the main provisions of Obamacare... then asked if they supported Obamacare. Funny thing, you know... lots and lots of people who said they supported each individual provision (or a majority) went crazy when they were put all together.

The administration *REALLY* let that get away from them and now it's too damn late.

Then again, they should've held out for the single effing pay option too.

But the on-insurance-until-26 is helping out a large, large number of young folks who aren't terribly likely to get insurance at whatever crappy job they manage to find in this economy (usually while still in school with aid going way down). Better yet are those who are starting their own businesses because they have a safety net as far as insurance goes and have a little bit of breathing room.

When you spend all your time at a job you hate but that gives you benefits, it's hard to nurture that entrepreneurial spirit that people keep giving BS lines about nurturing and attracting. F--k, it's hard to find the time and impossible to totally dedicate yourself to it if you're worried about ending up in the ER and having to declare bankruptcy.
 
2012-06-24 12:40:57 AM

taxandspend: Osama Bin Laden is dead. Gays can serve in the military without fear of being kicked out. The economy is recovering. That's all the change I need for one term. Would have had more if not for the party of no.


Yes, but everything isn't perfect yet so he's a failure and those millions of millions of strawmen people I can't cite right now who thought he was a wizard look foolish.
 
2012-06-24 12:46:20 AM
So lack of pic posting leads to alts.
 
2012-06-24 12:49:03 AM

Death_Poot: I just want to know, how is that any different from this, except for your political perspective:

[ttoes.files.wordpress.com image 640x909]

Go on, give me a rational, non emotional, non name calling explanation, without calling me racist, etc


The difference is one is supposed to be a positive message about getting America working again, and the other is supposed to be a negative message about how much Obama hates the Constitution.

Another big difference is that this is only one in a SERIES of paintings about how much Obama hates the Constitution.
 
2012-06-24 12:51:53 AM

puffy999: The funniest thing about that picture is that the man is holding dollar bills.

I bet you could take the talented, albeit insane, man who makes this art and back him into a logical corner within two seconds.


One thing I would love to ask him in person:

"In your most famous painting (with Jesus and the Constitution), your website says when you hover the mouse over Thomas Jefferson that he intended the 'wall of separation between Church and State' that he wrote about to be taken as a wall that only blocks the government from controlling or interfering with religion, not the other way around.

"Okay, you're an artist, right? Here's a blank piece of paper. Draw a sketch of this wall (not door, gate, turnstile, ramp, or whatever: Jefferson specifically called it a wall! Double-you, Aye, Ell, Ell, wall!) that could've been constructed using any technology that Jefferson would've known about, that blocks passage only from one side to the other, but freely allows passage in the opposite direction."
 
Displayed 50 of 649 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report