This guy also needs to consider life expectancy.

Women who have sex with multiple men are more likely to be murdered by their spouse, thus are unable to respond to the survey.

So, let's start with that same 5/5 example the guy uses.
Males A, B, and C marry Females A, B, C respectively. Each married couple has sex with each other, so average of 1 partner on both sides..
Male A has sex with females A (his wife), B (Male B's wife), D, and E.
Male B finds out about it and murders Female B.

So, number of sexual partners reported by gender.
A (4), B (1), C(1), D(0), E(0) = 6
A (1), , C(1), D(1), E(1) = 4

Now it turns out Male A is also a serial killer:
A (4), B(1), C(1), D(0), E(0) = 6
A (1), , C(1) = 2

I made sweet, sweet love to this thread and two others. One was in the politics tab. Doctor said a little ointment would clear that right up, though.

eurotrader: The number could explained simply. I know a few people that have had sex with in excess of 250 women so far excluding hookers, most stop counting at 100 and just use averaging per month. If you throw in pro athletes and show biz types whose number is a best guess of 500 plus, it makes the men that do not know how to talk women or are poor and ugly hovering at less than 5 have a higher average.

I hope you don't trade currencies based on the level of understanding of mathematics displayed by your statement.

Do you believe that there are fewer men than women in the population? That these values are medians rather than means? That the pool of responses is biased across gender? That the reporting is differentially reliable with respect to gender? That a much higher percentage of contacts are male to male than female to female?

Seriously, are you incapable of the most basic mathematical reasoning?