If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(National Review)   Obama cannot claim executive privilege over a scandal he owns lock, stock, and barrel because the papers requested never involved the White House   (nationalreview.com) divider line 18
    More: Ironic, President Obama, executive privilege, White House, D.C. Circuit, Furious, executive branches, DOJ, checks and balances  
•       •       •

2255 clicks; posted to Politics » on 21 Jun 2012 at 3:57 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-06-21 05:01:37 PM
2 votes:

Almet: My favorite part of the F&F situation is how it's gone from "F&F weapons were found among those confiscated after the agent's death" to "F&F guns killed the agent"


It's also nice that the right wing has finally come around to the argument that people don't kill people, guns kill people.
2012-06-21 05:01:34 PM
2 votes:
Hi, I'm a butthurt right-winger. How can you tell?

3.bp.blogspot.com

I am passionately outraged about Fast & Furious. Even though nobody else is --besides my ilk, anyway.

This is a petulant frenzy. A petulant frenzy.
I'm petulant. And I'm having a frenzy.
2012-06-21 04:55:44 PM
2 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-06-21 12:44:41 PM
2 votes:

Ricardo Klement: Most of CurrentTV


So YOU'RE the guy watching that.
2012-06-21 12:40:48 PM
2 votes:
Can't we just fast forward to the part where it's all Obama's fault?
2012-06-21 09:40:02 AM
2 votes:
So, wait, now the argument is that Obama WAS NEVER INVOLVED.

Thanks, NRO!
2012-06-21 09:38:21 AM
2 votes:
Good thing it's called White House Privilege, then.
2012-06-22 09:19:17 AM
1 votes:
Holder and Obama need to burn for this. Never before in the history of the United States have American or Mexican citizens died as a result of governmental impropriety.
2012-06-21 09:28:24 PM
1 votes:

Mikey1969: paygun: I still believe Obama when he stated he wanted an assault weapon ban. You're effectively calling Obama a liar if you don't think so.

Any more deflections?

I'm not deflecting. I believe Obama more than I believe Romney. I also don't believe Obama is going to present some kind of new assault weapons ban, but I DO believe a bunch of paranoid assholes are going to buy up all of the supplies again, artificially drive the price up, and empty the shelves.

Is that clear enough to show you that I'm not "deflecting"? The fact that I wouldn't trust Romney to tell me if my front yard had turned into a nuclear wasteland overnight, and that I personally don't think that Obama is going to pass a bunch of gun regs? Not because I think Obama is some kind of messiah but because I have seen nothing that really says that to me. You see it, that's fine, but please don't make a run on the gun store, I like to go shooting, and don't want my prices to double, while my supplies dwindle to almost zero again.


If Romney said that Obama was born in the US, I might actually convert to being a birfer.
2012-06-21 05:58:23 PM
1 votes:

Welfare Xmas: jcooli09: It works for people that repeat him, too.

What? You ad homonym attacks. You may want to try an argument style that is not false by construction.


What's a homonym attack? Using words that sound the same but have entirely different meanings? Example: "I'm a-gonna chute ewe!".

And you left a 'd' off of 'add'.
2012-06-21 05:46:44 PM
1 votes:

Welfare Xmas: jcooli09: It works for people that repeat him, too.

What? You ad homonym attacks. You may want to try an argument style that is not false by construction.


That's not an ad hominem. This is an ad hominem: Your argument is wrong because you're ugly.
2012-06-21 05:33:03 PM
1 votes:

Welfare Xmas: Mikey1969: I'm cusious as to how your logic equates '

It's not my logic, I'm not "the administration" and CBS didn't write the story about me.

//should be obvious


Well, if CBS says so...

/something something Rathergate
2012-06-21 05:17:48 PM
1 votes:

beta_plus: Liberal Butthurt typing detected.

/it's not a crime when we cover up a scandal!


Thank you, kind patriot, for exposing the scandal of this Kenyan Black Usurper from Africa and his sekrit muzlim plot to repeal the second amendment in his second term. WTF was Shartbama thinking?
2012-06-21 04:35:04 PM
1 votes:

DrippinBalls: heap
DrippinBalls: obama = bush

worthless liberals/leftists = gop/repukes.

It's the same shiat from both sides. Both sides are political idiots. Sad.

you're really bad at this.

dickhead. Figures. Christ, it's sick.


why don't you go relax in your room put some Bieber on and come back when you're ready to be nice.
2012-06-21 04:22:32 PM
1 votes:

DrippinBalls: obama = bush

worthless liberals/leftists = gop/repukes.

It's the same shiat from both sides. Both sides are political idiots. Sad.


The important part is that you have found a way to feel superior to both.
2012-06-21 01:33:23 PM
1 votes:

vpb: GAT_00: kingoomieiii: So, wait, now the argument is that Obama WAS NEVER INVOLVED.

Thanks, NRO!

Yeah, they didn't think that one through.

It won't matter. The don't lose points for logical inconstancy with their audience.


Today: Of course Obama wasn't involved. He isn't competent enough to keep an eye on what the crooks in his administration are doing. You know those people aren't that bright.

Tomorrow: Of course Obama was involved. It's his administration, and just like one of those people to orchestrate this sort of malfeasance on his watch.

I'd say their views are pretty consistent...0BAMA BAD!!!
2012-06-21 12:50:35 PM
1 votes:
Headline: Obama completely owns this scandal he had nothing to do with
2012-06-21 11:15:04 AM
1 votes:
Fiscally conservative doesn't mean fiscally sound.
 
Displayed 18 of 18 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report