Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Advocate)   Kansas trying to re institute Jim Crow laws. Because 'religion'   (advocate.com) divider line 72
    More: Asinine, Jim Crow laws, Kansas, Lawrence Journal-World, faiths  
•       •       •

9272 clicks; posted to Politics » on 19 Jun 2012 at 7:50 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-06-19 04:58:35 PM  
26 votes:
Look, you assholes...I'll make this REEEEEAL easy for you.

The First Amendment guarantees your right to have a religion.
The Second Amendment guarantees your right to have a gun.

But neither amendment gives you the right to use EITHER ONE to take away the rights of someone else.

PERIOD.
2012-06-19 05:28:12 PM  
8 votes:
The religion of me forbids me to pay taxes and requires me to have the public sexing. Thank you for starting this protection for me Kansas.

pizen: LasersHurt: Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!

Great Scott!


Dred Scott!
2012-06-19 05:25:56 PM  
8 votes:
Ooooooh, does this mean that I can move to Kansas, start a business, hire all Christians, find out they're Christians, and then fire them all because their lifestyle goes against my religious beliefs? That would be cool, right?
2012-06-19 05:36:09 PM  
7 votes:
These same people support Sharia Law for Muslims.

Religious freedom and all. You don't want secular laws trumping a person's religious freedom after all.

So, Kansas is pro- Sharia Law.
2012-06-19 05:07:01 PM  
6 votes:
I'm going to start pretending to be religious so I can get exemptions from the law.
2012-06-19 08:19:44 PM  
4 votes:
i.imgur.com

/Fark's been getting a lot of mileage outta this sucker lately.
2012-06-19 08:03:44 PM  
4 votes:
While everyone's bashing Kansas, they're not quite the only state where you can be fired for being gay:

cdn.front.moveon.org
2012-06-19 07:57:57 PM  
4 votes:
This is not the country both my great-grandfathers, both my grandfathers, and both my uncles fought to protect. This is the shiat they fought to protect us FROM. What the farking fark, Kansas? What the farking fark.

As if anyone needed more reason to get their taints to the polls in November and vote for Obama.
2012-06-19 08:26:15 PM  
3 votes:

LasersHurt: Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!


This isn't even a joke. Twenty or thirty years from now, we're going to be fighting the exact same battles we fought in the 1960s (or the 1930s vis-a-vis labor rights), and it will likely only be more violent and divisive. Look what's going on with labor in Wisconsin, voting rights in Florida, gay rights in Kansas, immigr . . . well, just about everything in Arizona.

And now, with Citizens United, the possibility of a peaceful pendulum swing or even finding an equilibrium are quite remote. Americans are going to have to forcibly take back with is rightfully theirs (which they admittedly handed over by voting stupidly in the first place), and it's not going to be pretty.

We are living in interesting times, my friends.
2012-06-19 07:58:41 PM  
3 votes:
2012-06-19 06:55:48 PM  
3 votes:

dahmers love zombie: meat0918: I love a good Supremacy clause fight.

New GOP slogan
"Because if we can't win fairly, we'll screw the fark out of anyone that lets us"

The single most important thing that Republicans in the US Congress have to do is ensure that Barack Obama is a one term president. Eric Cantor said that. The Single Most Important thing. Not "solving the economic crisis", "creating jobs", "passing a budget", "defending the Constitution", "following our oaths of office". Making sure that the sheriff is no longer near as of January 2013.


I think that was McConnell, but yeah, the Republican party has been the greatest threat to America for a while now.
2012-06-19 06:52:09 PM  
3 votes:

meat0918: I love a good Supremacy clause fight.

New GOP slogan
"Because if we can't win fairly, we'll screw the fark out of anyone that lets us"


The single most important thing that Republicans in the US Congress have to do is ensure that Barack Obama is a one term president. Eric Cantor said that. The Single Most Important thing. Not "solving the economic crisis", "creating jobs", "passing a budget", "defending the Constitution", "following our oaths of office". Making sure that the sheriff is no longer near as of January 2013.
2012-06-19 05:43:29 PM  
3 votes:
This sets up a pretty farked up precedent that goes beyond teh gay.
2012-06-19 05:32:35 PM  
3 votes:

Ambivalence: I am disheartened by how many states are vying for "Derpiest of them all" status.


It all started with Obama getting elected. These 'Christians' with elected power can't go after blacks anymore so they're going after gays and brown immigrants. Jesus would be so proud.

I can't wait for President Obama to get re-elected.
2012-06-19 05:25:34 PM  
3 votes:
I am disheartened by how many states are vying for "Derpiest of them all" status.

Kansas....seriously??
2012-06-19 05:08:36 PM  
3 votes:

Aarontology: I'm going to start pretending to be religious so I can get exemptions from the law.


My religion says I can't allow any Christians into my restaurant.

Hey, look, an angry mob of customers!
2012-06-19 05:06:07 PM  
3 votes:
Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!
2012-06-19 11:12:16 PM  
2 votes:
Looks like the bill "died in committee" on June 1.

Link
2012-06-19 09:04:26 PM  
2 votes:
We really just need a Supreme Court case that establishes sexual orientation as a protected class. Lawrence v. Texas started the ball rolling, and even the more conservative Justices seem to be okay with saying you can't discriminate against people for who they do. I may be overly optimistic, but I think within the next 5-10 years it'll be established as a protected class and all these state and local asshats can go fark themselves (NTTAWWT, since people should be able to fark whomever they want, provided consent).
2012-06-19 08:59:26 PM  
2 votes:
This country wants to fail. There's no other reason to behave this way. It's become so preoccupied with what legal channels it has to fark itself over that it completely forgot that it shouldn't be trying to fark itself over.
2012-06-19 08:20:08 PM  
2 votes:

vernonFL: These same people support Sharia Law for Muslims.

Religious freedom and all. You don't want secular laws trumping a person's religious freedom after all.

So, Kansas is pro- Sharia Law.


About that...

Kansas Governor, Sam Brownback, Signs Anti-Sharia Bill, Effectively Banning Islamic Law

So, how would these two laws work together?
2012-06-19 08:14:56 PM  
2 votes:
Even Goldwater knew, and this is over 50 years ago

i239.photobucket.com
i239.photobucket.com
2012-06-19 08:14:16 PM  
2 votes:
Its funny how some Christians whine constantly about persecution whilst persecuting everyone who doesn't live the way they do. If it didn't hurt so many people, it'd be hilarious.
2012-06-19 08:11:05 PM  
2 votes:

Quasar: "I don't think an ordinance should trump other people's religious rights," said Rep. Jan Pauls, a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee that heard testimony about the bill. During a forum earlier this year, Pauls gave an example to explain why she backs the bill, saying an employer should be allowed to fire a "cross dresser."

That sounds reasonable. Why should my religious rights be trampled by your sheer audacity to exist as you are?



How does that sound reasonable?

I worked with a man that was a cross-dresser. He dressed very tastefully and had much better fashion sense then most people I know. He was a cool guy to chat with, very smart, and wouldn't bring it up unless you questioned him about it.

He has two children, a college degree and was a very nice guy. Why should he lose his job? Just because he doesn't dress the way a lot of people dress? Are we Americans so against individuality that we think it's acceptable to fire someone over that?

You know, this is not the freedom loving country I was told it was while growing up.....
2012-06-19 08:06:00 PM  
2 votes:
farking bigots... Few life choices offend me as much as when people choose to be bigots.
2012-06-19 08:03:29 PM  
2 votes:
A few comments:

1) The law in question died in the Senate and was not enacted (thank FSM).
2) The linked article is almost three months old.
2012-06-19 07:57:30 PM  
2 votes:

exick: leftteffticle: Ooooooh, does this mean that I can move to Kansas, start a business, hire all Christians, find out they're Christians, and then fire them all because their lifestyle goes against my religious beliefs? That would be cool, right?

I would say yes, but they try to cover their asses on that one by saying "Any person found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have abused the protection of this act by making a fraudulent claim may be enjoined from filing further claims under this act without leave of court."

Which just means that your "religion" has to be based on a poorly-sourced book that's at least a few hundred years old and not just invented in your mind. And that also means that the state of Kansas is going to be sued into oblivion by people whose religions they find to be fraudulent.


Mormons are hosed then.
2012-06-19 07:02:39 PM  
2 votes:
Religion: using outdated fairy tales to justify hatred for at least 2,000 years.
2012-06-19 06:44:49 PM  
2 votes:
I think Dorothy better go back to Oz. Her friends aren't welcome in Kansas.
2012-06-19 06:28:24 PM  
2 votes:
Sigh. "people.virginia.edu."
2012-06-19 05:59:39 PM  
2 votes:

exick:
I would say yes, but they try to cover their asses on that one by saying "Any person found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have abused the protection of this act by making a fraudulent claim may be enjoined from filing further claims under this act without leave of court."

Which just means that your "religion" has to be based on a poorly-sourced book that's at least a few hundred years old and not just invented in your mind. And that also means that the state of Kansas is going to be sued into oblivion by people whose religions they find to be fraudulent.


Hmm, good point... but then again, I'm an atheist, so my beef with Christians is totally legit and their lifestyle of bigotry is totally against my "religion" (or rather lack there of) and I don't see why I should have to support it.
2012-06-19 05:46:36 PM  
2 votes:
Something, something, "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

I don't have a GED in Law or anything, but something tells me that this bill which allows that "anyone could opt out of anti-discrimination laws that protect gays and lesbians," specifically denies certain persons within Kansas jurisdiction the equal protection of their laws.
2012-06-19 05:41:48 PM  
2 votes:

leftteffticle: Ooooooh, does this mean that I can move to Kansas, start a business, hire all Christians, find out they're Christians, and then fire them all because their lifestyle goes against my religious beliefs? That would be cool, right?


I would say yes, but they try to cover their asses on that one by saying "Any person found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have abused the protection of this act by making a fraudulent claim may be enjoined from filing further claims under this act without leave of court."

Which just means that your "religion" has to be based on a poorly-sourced book that's at least a few hundred years old and not just invented in your mind. And that also means that the state of Kansas is going to be sued into oblivion by people whose religions they find to be fraudulent.
2012-06-19 05:29:23 PM  
2 votes:

meow said the dog: The religion of me forbids me to pay taxes and requires me to have the public sexing. Thank you for starting this protection for me Kansas.

pizen: LasersHurt: Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!

Great Scott!

Dred Scott!


You're too good for Fark.
2012-06-19 05:06:35 PM  
2 votes:
"I don't think an ordinance should trump other people's religious rights," said Rep. Jan Pauls, a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee that heard testimony about the bill. During a forum earlier this year, Pauls gave an example to explain why she backs the bill, saying an employer should be allowed to fire a "cross dresser."

That sounds reasonable. Why should my religious rights be trampled by your sheer audacity to exist as you are?
2012-06-20 01:17:54 PM  
1 votes:
...Did these people just miss out on the 'everyone's our friend and racism leads to the Holocaust' TV specials as kids or something? Seriously, what the fark is wrong with them?
2012-06-20 09:33:49 AM  
1 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-06-20 03:56:08 AM  
1 votes:
If you don't want a Bar Mitzvah,
DON'T HAVE A BAR MITZVAH.
But don't tell me I can't have one because it conflicts with YOUR religious beliefs.
Or that I can't have an abortion because of your religious beliefs.
Or that I can't same gender marry because of your fricking religious beliefs.
Or that I should be fired because of your Goddamned religios beliefs.
2012-06-20 03:01:07 AM  
1 votes:
My religion requires the government to provide free pot to everyone. Anything else is a violation of my religious liberty.
2012-06-20 01:57:13 AM  
1 votes:

EmmaLou: This is basically the flip side of what's being voted on in Lincoln, NE this year. The city passed an anti-discrimination bill which would protect LGBT people from housing and job discrimination. People had a problem with this, and forced it to be put on the ballot.


and it's been the law in backwards counciltucky for over a decade
2012-06-19 11:43:04 PM  
1 votes:

kg2095: Maybe, but surely she should only worry about her own adherence to the rules of her religion. What other people do is none of her business


I take it you have never been around many evangelicals then?
Or the counter example atheist on Fark who claim that anyone who believes in an invisilbe sky wizard is either an idiot or mentally ill.
2012-06-19 11:41:18 PM  
1 votes:
www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net

Gay discrimination in a nutshell.

/Fark off, Kansas
2012-06-19 11:38:31 PM  
1 votes:
If your "religion" compels/empowers you to be an insufferable dick towards certain people, then you don't deserve to have the "freedom" to practice it.

How about I start up my own religion? I'll call it "Punchism". It involves going around punching fundamentalist christians in the face where ever and whenever I see one. Men, women, old ladies, babies. Doesn't matter. if they're fundies, then they must be punched.

If you raise a fuss, I'll just say "don't blame me. My Supreme God, Foopadoopazoopy-zap, commandeth me to do this".
2012-06-19 11:20:38 PM  
1 votes:

Omahawg: kg2095: The Name: LasersHurt: Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!

This isn't even a joke. Twenty or thirty years from now, we're going to be fighting the exact same battles we fought in the 1960s (or the 1930s vis-a-vis labor rights), and it will likely only be more violent and divisive. Look what's going on with labor in Wisconsin, voting rights in Florida, gay rights in Kansas, immigr . . . well, just about everything in Arizona.

And now, with Citizens United, the possibility of a peaceful pendulum swing or even finding an equilibrium are quite remote. Americans are going to have to forcibly take back with is rightfully theirs (which they admittedly handed over by voting stupidly in the first place), and it's not going to be pretty.

We are living in interesting times, my friends.

I don't think so. These dinosaurs are on the way out and they know it. That's why they are making so much noise - they're struggling against reality.

With each passing year there are less of them and thirty years from now the last of them will have succumbed to old age.

if wish you were right but look at the young ron paul pseudo-libertarians, evangelical youth pastors who have wives with clown car vaginas and don't believe in evolution, and the otherwise mass of uninformed youth who pay more attention to angry birds and celebrity gossip than their future.

yeah...the derp is growing and spreading and must be stomped out with the great light of rationality. or, you know, a two by four.

extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice indeed, barry.


And you see, it's not even just that. Even if the Talibangelical-type Republicans are mostly dead in thirty years, TODAY they are making a horrible mess AND putting in place measures that will make it ever harder to clean up after them. That's why I brought up Wisconsin and Florida, above. It isn't just a matter of Republicans (or anyone else for that matter) doing bad stuff -they're removing the very mechanisms in the system that make it possible to fight back peacefully. What good does a liberal majority do you if it isn't allowed to vote or organize?
2012-06-19 11:18:31 PM  
1 votes:

kg2095: spongeboob: Kome: Phins: Her wedding was all about "woman submits to the man,"

Phins: People having sex that involves bondage violates her religious rights.

She sounds like a hypocrite.

Maybe she is only against males being bound and at the mercy of the woman. Or she could be worried about sex that doesn't lead to procreation, oral, manual, anal, because if there isn't a possibilty of prenancy God frowns on it. She just knows that her husband might slip in her backdoor if she can't stop him, but wait if she is supposed to submit to her husband does that mean that she does oral when her husband ask for it or does her Bible say that is a no no and that trumps her husbands position as head of the household.

/When the wife and I got our premarriage counseling the preacher told us a couple of stories, the first was about a husband who had trouble getting it up and his wife helped him out with this by "kissing his penis" he said this was not only okay it was a sign that the wife loved her husband. The second story was about a couple who approached him about whether anal sex was allowed, he said he went through the whole Bible but couldn't find any place anal sex between a married couple was forbidden.
//No he didn't use names when he told us the stories so I am not sure that my inlaws weren't one of the couples
///Yeah I know CSB

Maybe, but surely she should only worry about her own adherence to the rules of her religion. What other people do is none of her business.


That's the thing she can't seem to understand. She believes that other people doing things violates her freedom of religion. No one is preventing her from practicing her religion but somehow free birth control and bondage sex for other people violates her freedoms.
2012-06-19 11:08:17 PM  
1 votes:
nope.

ozmud.files.wordpress.com
2012-06-19 11:00:49 PM  
1 votes:

kg2095: The Name: LasersHurt: Hey, guys, remember THE PAST? Good, because we're going back!

This isn't even a joke. Twenty or thirty years from now, we're going to be fighting the exact same battles we fought in the 1960s (or the 1930s vis-a-vis labor rights), and it will likely only be more violent and divisive. Look what's going on with labor in Wisconsin, voting rights in Florida, gay rights in Kansas, immigr . . . well, just about everything in Arizona.

And now, with Citizens United, the possibility of a peaceful pendulum swing or even finding an equilibrium are quite remote. Americans are going to have to forcibly take back with is rightfully theirs (which they admittedly handed over by voting stupidly in the first place), and it's not going to be pretty.

We are living in interesting times, my friends.

I don't think so. These dinosaurs are on the way out and they know it. That's why they are making so much noise - they're struggling against reality.

With each passing year there are less of them and thirty years from now the last of them will have succumbed to old age.


if wish you were right but look at the young ron paul pseudo-libertarians, evangelical youth pastors who have wives with clown car vaginas and don't believe in evolution, and the otherwise mass of uninformed youth who pay more attention to angry birds and celebrity gossip than their future.

yeah...the derp is growing and spreading and must be stomped out with the great light of rationality. or, you know, a two by four.

extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice indeed, barry.
2012-06-19 10:30:50 PM  
1 votes:

hourheroyes: meat0918: Lionel Mandrake: A message for Evangelicals from The Big Guy:



[skepchick.org image 222x150]
YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG

Kansas is why God is punishing America.

Remember that whole "Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me."

Yeah, a whole lot of Christians are headed for Hell.

I like how you defend true Christianity by invoking eternal torture of people you disagree with.


It's what is written in their book of fairy tales.
2012-06-19 10:10:40 PM  
1 votes:
The question is personal belief as far as religion

Makes sense to me. Wait, no it doesn't. On the other hand, f*ck you, Kansas.
2012-06-19 09:55:39 PM  
1 votes:

MrEricSir: Who wants to bet they'll repeal this law as soon as they realize it applies to non-Christians?

I mean, as soon as a Muslim boss decides all his female employers must wear burkas, or a Scientologist boss decides to fire everyone who's ever been to a shrink, or...


You mean the way that the rules allowing Christian clubs were used to allow the formation of gay straight alliances. I think there were some schools that got rid of all clubs to keep the gays out. Here is one Link
2012-06-19 09:52:35 PM  
1 votes:

Wangiss: Kome: F*CK RELIGION GODDAMMIT! YOUR RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS DO NOT TRUMP THE FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO ONLY WANT TO BE TREATED AS EQUALS YOU STUPID MOTHER F*CKERS!!

touché


Meh, the thread was lacking emotional indignation. Felt it could use a boost.
2012-06-19 09:48:03 PM  
1 votes:
Who wants to bet they'll repeal this law as soon as they realize it applies to non-Christians?

I mean, as soon as a Muslim boss decides all his female employers must wear burkas, or a Scientologist boss decides to fire everyone who's ever been to a shrink, or...
2012-06-19 09:34:09 PM  
1 votes:

Kome: F*CK RELIGION GODDAMMIT! YOUR RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS DO NOT TRUMP THE FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO ONLY WANT TO BE TREATED AS EQUALS YOU STUPID MOTHER F*CKERS!!


touché
2012-06-19 09:07:09 PM  
1 votes:

nmrsnr: I may be overly optimistic, but I think within the next 5-10 years it'll be established as a protected class and all these state and local asshats can go fark themselves


That's very optimistic. Five of the nine current justices are GOP shills, and if Romney wins, it isn't going to get any better.
2012-06-19 09:02:43 PM  
1 votes:

Phins: Employers choosing to provide free birth control with health insurance violates her religious rights.


I'd love to hear her try to explain that.
2012-06-19 09:00:45 PM  
1 votes:
This sort of thing always makes me thing of my husband's cousin who's a serious evangelical type. Her wedding was all about "woman submits to the man," doesn't use birth control, etc. She constantly claims her religious rights are being violated.

Law requiring employers to provide free birth control with health insurance violates her religious rights.
Employers choosing to provide free birth control with health insurance violates her religious rights.
The existence of pornography violates her religious rights.
People having sex that involves bondage violates her religious rights.

I don't understand why these religious types are always getting all worked up by things that don't actually affect them.
2012-06-19 08:56:13 PM  
1 votes:

Cato: To say you have you be forced to associate with anyone you do not wish to - and that certainly includes business relationships - is unconstitutional


So laws banning hiring discrimination are unconstitutional?
2012-06-19 08:41:37 PM  
1 votes:
t1.gstatic.com

"Do I have to come back down there? Cause its looking like I do."
2012-06-19 08:32:56 PM  
1 votes:

Omahawg: I encourage any and all kansas farkers who find this outrageous to move on up here to Iowa. It seems ya'll have lost the fight against derp but we could sure use ya here.


I cannot befarkinglieve I'm considering this proposal...
2012-06-19 08:31:41 PM  
1 votes:
ecx.images-amazon.com
2012-06-19 08:30:49 PM  
1 votes:
Someone found a religion that is discriminatory against white males. Then come troll the fark out of our piss-water, ass-backwards state. Please.
2012-06-19 08:27:12 PM  
1 votes:
Have these style of laws ever beentested to the supreme court? The constitution is very clear. You can't by law discriminate. Or am I missing something?
2012-06-19 08:24:19 PM  
1 votes:

ordinarysteve: Its funny how some Christians whine constantly about persecution whilst persecuting everyone who doesn't live the way they do. If it didn't hurt so many people, it'd be hilarious.


They're not really persecuted. Disliked... but mostly because they try to tell everyone what they can and can't do. If they could just keep it to themselves and live their lives as they want to without trying to tell everyone else how to live too, nobody would give a shiat what they believed. What they do, is projection.
2012-06-19 08:12:14 PM  
1 votes:
Suppose the entire code of Kansas were against my religious beliefs. "Sorry officer, but you have no jurisdiction here, laws against robbing liquor stores are against my religion."

.
2012-06-19 08:06:04 PM  
1 votes:

HeartBurnKid: FTFA: "I don't think an ordinance should trump other people's religious rights," said Rep. Jan Pauls, a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee that heard testimony about the bill. During a forum earlier this year, Pauls gave an example to explain why she backs the bill, saying an employer should be allowed to fire a "cross dresser."

"The question is personal belief as far as religion," she said. "Should that be trumped by forcing people to then support a lifestyle that they don't support due to their religion?"

I completely agree with this. Why, just the other day, I was lamenting how the law renders me unable to sacrifice nubile young virgins to my lord Quetzalcoatl.


I haven't been able to complete all the rites necessary to rouse Cthulhu from his eternal slumber. Who can I sue?
2012-06-19 07:54:04 PM  
1 votes:
My religious beliefs won't let me hire Christians so I'm moving to Kansas if this thing passes so I can freely practice my beliefs. Suck it haters.
2012-06-19 06:45:12 PM  
1 votes:

Lionel Mandrake: A message for Evangelicals from The Big Guy:



[skepchick.org image 222x150]
YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG


Kansas is why God is punishing America.

Remember that whole "Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me."

Yeah, a whole lot of Christians are headed for Hell.
2012-06-19 06:42:19 PM  
1 votes:
I love a good Supremacy clause fight.

New GOP slogan
"Because if we can't win fairly, we'll screw the fark out of anyone that lets us"
2012-06-19 05:51:40 PM  
1 votes:

A message for Evangelicals from The Big Guy:



skepchick.org
YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG
2012-06-19 05:27:25 PM  
1 votes:

leftteffticle: Ooooooh, does this mean that I can move to Kansas, start a business, hire all Christians, find out they're Christians, and then fire them all because their lifestyle goes against my religious beliefs? That would be cool, right?


Go for it!
2012-06-19 05:06:45 PM  
1 votes:
HOLY shiat.
2012-06-19 03:58:29 PM  
1 votes:
Oh, what the f**k now? >_<
 
Displayed 72 of 72 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report