If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Think Progress)   Soledad: So remember when Romney said he'd veto the Dream Act? Pawlenty: What, oh no no. He was talking about the...uh..Cream Act. Yeah, that's the ticket   (thinkprogress.org) divider line 21
    More: Stupid, Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney, dreams, Soledad O'Brien, vetoes  
•       •       •

5179 clicks; posted to Politics » on 18 Jun 2012 at 1:56 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
jbc [TotalFark]
2012-06-18 01:57:23 PM  
5 votes:
Rmoney supports both the Dogs Riding Exclusively Atop Minivans Act and the Donut Recognition Education And Mastery Act.
2012-06-18 01:58:22 PM  
4 votes:
The Cream Act sucked. Most of the models weren't even teens and the money shots looked faked.
2012-06-18 06:40:50 PM  
2 votes:

I stand with Obama and Biden on the Cream Act.

img241.imageshack.us
2012-06-18 02:23:21 PM  
2 votes:

Antimatter: The problem is, they support the act, but hate that passing it now would give the credit to Obama. the result is they must oppose it, but be in favor of passing it when they get the full credit for it.


Which explains their opposition to ObamaCare - the fact that his name will be more or less permanently attached to it.

I can't wait to see them lose their sh*t when a future Democratic Congress starts naming buildings and other things after him.
2012-06-18 02:10:11 PM  
2 votes:

Sweet Chin Music: [www.soundfinder.jp image 480x480]


hahah, I could definitely see Rmoney backing the Cash Rules Everything Around Me Act.
/dolla dolla bill, y'all
2012-06-18 05:07:07 PM  
1 votes:

Ed Finnerty: PsyLord: I wish that news organizations will use voice stress analysis and real time fact checking whenever they interview politicians.

/can't be that hard, can it?

With Romney, a Voight-Kampff would be enough.


AGENT: You're at a campaign event when a progressive in the crow starts heckling you --
ROMNEY: A progressive? What's that?
AGENT (eyes narrowing): You know what a liberal is?
ROMNEY: Of course.
AGENT: Same thing.
2012-06-18 04:46:27 PM  
1 votes:

Ed Finnerty: PsyLord: I wish that news organizations will use voice stress analysis and real time fact checking whenever they interview politicians.

/can't be that hard, can it?

With Romney, a Voight-Kampff would be enough.


Would Rmoney even know what a turtle is?
2012-06-18 04:23:49 PM  
1 votes:
RMONEY • PAWLENTY
2012

We can't wait to get our Paws on your Money!
2012-06-18 04:02:02 PM  
1 votes:

Cletus C.: "For those who come here illegally, the idea of giving them in-state tuition credits or other special benefits I find to be contrary to the idea of a nation of law."

Clearly, Romney hates immigrants.


He's got a lot of nerve for an anchor baby.
2012-06-18 03:30:14 PM  
1 votes:
Wow, I'm more surprised a member of the media actually challenged a Romney spokesmen about something Romney said and now is walking back.

I'm absolutely not surprised that Romney is trying ever so hard to wind his way towards the middle, but I don't think the Tea PartyWhite Whine Party is going to let him.
2012-06-18 03:19:28 PM  
1 votes:
newspaper.li
2012-06-18 03:06:56 PM  
1 votes:
The follow-up album a couple years later wasn't anywhere near as good.

www.freqresponse.com
2012-06-18 02:33:42 PM  
1 votes:
...he would be willing to allow a pathway to legal status for children no are in this situation. For example, if they serve in the military and are honorably discharged.

So, Romney might support the DREAM Act, and clearly supports child soldiers.
2012-06-18 02:22:39 PM  
1 votes:

Aldon: gotta shake that etch-a-sketch!


annnnnd it's JtM by a nose!
2012-06-18 02:22:19 PM  
1 votes:
991.com

Get on top.
2012-06-18 02:08:40 PM  
1 votes:
One of these days even a toad like Pawlenty is going to have to recognize that we've come to a crossroads in determining how political discourse will be shaped for years to come. In Cream DREAM we have a policy that has bipartisan approval, but he can't just acknowledge that without adding at least a spoonful of divisive, partisan rhetoric. This is only going to get worse, I feel. Free acknowledgement of positive acts by one's political opponents should be encouraged, without fear that your party leadership is going to toss you in a white room with rubber padded walls.
2012-06-18 02:04:25 PM  
1 votes:
www.soundfinder.jp
2012-06-18 02:02:07 PM  
1 votes:

jbc: Rmoney supports both the Dogs Riding Exclusively Atop Minivans Act and the Donut Recognition Education And Mastery Act.


Knowing the difference between a double-double and a Boston cream is vital to the security of the Republic.
2012-06-18 01:59:01 PM  
1 votes:
Milk has rights too, you know.
2012-06-18 01:47:51 PM  
1 votes:
FTFA: His views shifted in April, however, when he expressed support for the DREAM Act, saying the Republicans need to propose a GOP version of the bill and other initiatives to win support from Hispanic voters.

'a GOP version of the bill...'
Hmm, like maybe the DREAM Act that was introduced by Orrin Hatch?
2012-06-18 01:23:28 PM  
1 votes:
It's universal healthcare all over again.

"I'm steadfastly against this and will repeal it until such a time as I'm the one proposing it!"
 
Displayed 21 of 21 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report