You frgot to go Mwaa ha ha while steepling your fingers.

Lionsgate, subby

with an 's'.

it's in the article 4 times.

calbert: Lionsgate, subby

with an 's'.

it's in the article 4 times.

Dude, are you that desperate to nick pick? Subby did just fine with this headline, and the comments section will do pretty well, ...as well ...

Donnchadha: Are all the movies out? I thought there may have been one more.

In which case -- we're talking about rebooting a franchise before it's over?

Breaking Dawn part 2 has yet to his theaters.

Why?????

Looks like we've already got some folks lining up for their shot at reprising the role of Kristen Stewart....

Breaking Her Anal Hymen has yet to hit the screen

tudorgurl: Why?????

I don't know. Why did they remake Total Recall?

Hollywood knows no bounds to its lunacy.

Clyde_Suckfinger: Looks like we've already got some folks lining up for their shot at reprising the role of Kristen Stewart....

[www.superhoneycomb.com image 550x413]

I lol'd so hard they heard me across the street. Awesome!

doglover: I would pay to see a Twilight: The Musical Sparkle movie.

FTFY

MusicMakeMyHeadPound: tudorgurl: Why?????

I don't know. Why did they remake Total Recall?

That actually makes some sense, as the first film had little to do with the source material, and Hollywood has been on a Philip K Dick kick recently. It's like remaking Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick: every reason to do it, no reason not to.

If the new Spiderman is a success, all movies released in 2013 shall be rebooted and remade for 2014 starring, younger/hipper actors.

Dwight_Yeast: MusicMakeMyHeadPound: tudorgurl: Why?????

I don't know. Why did they remake Total Recall?

That actually makes some sense, as the first film had little to do with the source material, and Hollywood has been on a Philip K Dick kick recently. It's like remaking Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick: every reason to do it, no reason not to.

Do you just repeat everything you hear without actually reading the book? The Arnold version did tell the Dick version, it just did it very fast and THEN it added a bunch of shiat to it.

Mugato: Dwight_Yeast: That actually makes some sense, as the first film had little to do with the source material

Actually, based on the trailers, it looks like a remake of the film as opposed to a closer adaptation of the book. I could be wrong but what's more likely, that the screenwriter read the book or just watched the movie?

No one goes to Mars in this one, if I'm not mistaken.

That and a Beckinsale/Biel catfight.

All the movies have been a special kind of shiat, and they come from fitting source material, but the first movie was such a special kind of absolute shiat in every way possible that I fear it alone will lead someone to want to make a reboot.

Apos: fusillade762: Mugato: Dwight_Yeast: That actually makes some sense, as the first film had little to do with the source material

Actually, based on the trailers, it looks like a remake of the film as opposed to a closer adaptation of the book. I could be wrong but what's more likely, that the screenwriter read the book or just watched the movie?

No one goes to Mars in this one, if I'm not mistaken.

That and a Beckinsale/Biel catfight.

The prospect of Beckinsale and Biel going for each other's throats isn't enough of an incentive to part with my hard-earned wages for this. Something's wrong with me,I guess.

Well that depends on your perspective on homosexuality. Do you consider it wrong?

tudorgurl: Why?????

That was my reaction. The first movie isn't even four years old.

Dwight_Yeast:

I don't know. Why did they remake Total Recall?

That actually makes some sense, as the first film had little to do with the source material, and Hollywood has been on a Philip K Dick kick recently. It's like remaking Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick: every reason to do it, no reason not to.

Also, it's been more than 20 years since the Ahnold version and that's within the usual time range for remakes.

Speaking of remakes...the movie that I really want to see remade is Flash Gordon...that movie could have been SO much cooler cheesier! With today's special effects, you could make an AWESOME Flash Gordon movie!!!

Hmm, how about Vivid instead? Or Brazzers?.

NDP2: Also, it's been more than 20 years since the Ahnold version and that's within the usual time range for remakes.

That might be my problem with it more than anything else. I remember seeing that movie in the theater.

Then again, that was back when no one gave a shiat about an 11-year-old buying a ticket for an R-rated movie, so maybe I just have to accept that I'm old :P

Pud: calbert: Lionsgate, subby

with an 's'.

it's in the article 4 times.

Dude, are you that desperate to nick pick? Subby did just fine with this headline, and the comments section will do pretty well, ...as well ...



I look forward to subby's future submissions about "Twylight" and "Robart Patenson"

Where will they find someone with less emotional impact than Kristen Stewart??

Apos: CalamitousCrasher: Where will they find someone with less emotional impact than Kristen Stewart??

January Jones would like a word with you.

Yeah, but Jones is hot, so at least she has that going for her.

Did the last movie even come out yet? I can't even make it through the rifftracks without falling asleep.

Tarl3k: Speaking of remakes...the movie that I really want to see remade is Flash Gordon...that movie could have been SO much cooler cheesier! With today's special effects, you could make an AWESOME Flash Gordon movie!!!

As long as the keep the Queen soundtrack.

How they should reboot "Twilight""

-Hire a bunch of young men of various races and nationalities, make sure they have a variety of body forms from muscular to slim to androgynous

-Have them wear nothing but thongs, in various colors that accentuate their skin tones

-Oil them up good, all over

-Stick some plastic fangs on their incisors

-Shoot a two-hour film of them outside in various natural places doing various things, with lots of snuggling and caressing and other physical contact, giving fang flashes and lustful looks to the camera

-Rake in money from females and interested males

-Give me the most pristine print of it

ThatDarkFellow: Do you just repeat everything you hear without actually reading the book?

No, I just make a point of not reading Philip K Dick; I know enough about his work to know I won't like it.

Smeggy Smurf: CalamitousCrasher: Where will they find someone with less emotional impact than Kristen Stewart??

[images.zap2it.com image 540x720]

Not funny.

Clyde_Suckfinger: Looks like we've already got some folks lining up for their shot at reprising the role of Kristen Stewart....

[www.superhoneycomb.com image 550x413]

To be fair, the problem there is more with the source material than the actress. There are very few books I've been simply unable to finish, with Twilight I got maybe a third of the way into book two before I simply couldn't take it anymore, put the thing down by a candle, and left the gas stove open so that the building exploded as I walked in slow motion down the front walk and put on my sunglasses.

//All right, I may have embellished that a bit.
//I'm glad they made it into movies, they're considerably less stupid than the novels (for example, the movie dialogue evidences at least a vague grasp of how the English language operates) and short enough that I can catch up on the plot to more effectively mock the series.