Just waiting for the commercial showing interaction between Siri and Stephen Hawking

But without Siri how would I know if it's raining out while looking out my window?

LasersHurt: Apple Fanboy Fanboy

You got me. I pay $500 every 6 months for the latest edition of "Talking Points against Apple." It's really just the same list with minor variations, but it makes me feel special to get the latest one.

What's the difference between an iPhone and a turd?

The turd is the guy who starts yammering at you because you bought an iPhone.

It has to be the easiest case to prove or disprove. Can you say the things the actors say to the Siri in the ads and get the same results that the Siri in the ads give in the same amount of time?

I immediately dismissed it as what Ask Jeeves was in the early days of the internet. It let people who didn't just want to enter keywords to talk in regular sentences. Like "I need to jack off to Rosie O'Donnell. Has she been in a movie or premium cable tv show where she appears naked?" as opposed to "rosieodonnell+naked".

9beers: namatad: You haven't seen a single commercial in decades which wasnt false advertising.
tastes great! less filling!! complete false advert
good to the last drop?! only if you like swill
every add with a picture of food has been doctored.
every glamour shot for women's clothing is complete false advertising

Most of your examples are matters of personal opinion. This lawsuit is about the functionality of a product. If I see a commercial that says Miller is a great tasting and refreshing beer and I find that it tastes like piss, that's my opinion, nothing more. If I see a commercial for a battery operated drill that claims an 8 hour life and it only last for 4 hours, that's false advertising.


Yeah, there's no comparison because there are concrete examples of shiat that Siri obviously doesn't do. The difference is that when I saw the commercials I knew they were bullshiat and dismissed them. I didn't run out and buy one and get all butthurt when they didn't turn out to be the Enterprise main computer. What I don't get is how those ads even got made without someone saying, "Wait a minute, this is horseshiat and some douchebag lawyer is going to talk a bunch of people into suing us".

What they should be suing over is the fact that those ads made Sam Jackson uncool, John Malkovich even scarier and made me want to smack Zooey Daschenal.

/not with my hand

9beers: I could actually see Apple losing this one. If they can show in court that Siri doesn't function as shown in commercials, how is that not false advertising? If you watch the commercials, there isn't any kind of disclaimer that would cover their asses.



Mr. Simpson, this is the most blatant case of fraudulent advertising since my suit against the film, "The Never-Ending Story."

trying to figure out who is a bigger douche
people who use siri
or people complain when it doesnt work like in TV