If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Maybe it's time to re-evaluate if your sex life is too rough when people stumble upon your sex chamber and mistake it for a crime scene   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 386
    More: Obvious, swedish, BDSM, free country, Swedish language, Aftonbladet, Dee Severe, HuffPost, limping  
•       •       •

18049 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Jun 2012 at 5:45 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



386 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-06-14 11:42:32 AM

Need Help Soonish: Three times... You don't care so much you have now told me three times how much you don't care.


You seriously cannot be this obtuse. I assume that when I read something this stupid, so grossly uninformed so clearly missing the point that you must be trolling.

Because otherwise you are borderline retarded.

///and yet, I bet you will respond to this one too by completely missing the point again, moran....
 
2012-06-14 11:43:27 AM

Shakespeare's Sister:
Thank you! I agree. Understanding the needs of others requires putting others first. I do not think that people are wired that way anymoe. Giving in does nothing but breed resentment--not only on the part of the person giving in but also to the person given in to. I do not think that men are stupid. If a woman is not honest with her partner, he can not really give her what she wants. Men are not mind readers.


No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!
 
2012-06-14 11:57:37 AM

SuperChuck: Shakespeare's Sister:
Thank you! I agree. Understanding the needs of others requires putting others first. I do not think that people are wired that way anymoe. Giving in does nothing but breed resentment--not only on the part of the person giving in but also to the person given in to. I do not think that men are stupid. If a woman is not honest with her partner, he can not really give her what she wants. Men are not mind readers.

No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!


Heehee. You got me there. I am not a man. I know women can be just as stupid. We pout, cry, withdraw, and answer "nothing" when asked what is wrong. No problem is solved that way. We tell our best friends what we want, need, and fantasize about, but not our spouses. That solves nothing.

I know that men are more goal oriented (problem solvers) than women are. I believe that men go outside the home for sex, usually, only after the man has said "I want more sex" and the woman says or indicates "no" through words or actions. I have to say, if a woman withholds sex as a punishment, she is a farking moron!

On a side note. . .you do not sound stupid :)
 
2012-06-14 11:57:43 AM

Chigau: Need Help Soonish: Mark Ratner: Jeez, some of you people are not right in the head, you sinners.

How about two people on a couch watching a romantic comedy, like "When Harry Met Sally" or "The Notebook," and flirting a bit while sharing a bottle of wine? After the movie ends, you talk and flirt some more, and then kiss passionately while engaging in some heavy petting. Move to the bedroom, turn off the lights, and make love like normal people.

OR!

We could kill zombies on the couch for a couple of hours while drinking rum, go to the bathroom, engage in oral, anal, and fisting while showering, then finish up with our girlfriend a few hours later when she shows up.

///I like my way better thank you...
///also, romantic comedies are a scourge upon our society :/

Ohhh, can i come to?


Sure... Just don't stick your dick in the mashed tatters! It's not gonna be that kind of party :P
 
2012-06-14 12:03:49 PM

halfof33: Need Help Soonish: Three times... You don't care so much you have now told me three times how much you don't care.

You seriously cannot be this obtuse. I assume that when I read something this stupid, so grossly uninformed so clearly missing the point that you must be trolling.

Because otherwise you are borderline retarded.

///and yet, I bet you will respond to this one too by completely missing the point again, moran....


Trolling?

Naaaa...

Im not the one posting about how much I don't care about others sex lives in a fark thread about other peoples sex lives.

That would be like going to a politics thread and stating over and over again about how much I didn't care about politics, and would you people PLEASE shut up about it!

But congratulations! Your farkied in titty pink now, so you do have that going for you... which is nice!
 
2012-06-14 12:05:24 PM

Shakespeare's Sister: SuperChuck: Shakespeare's Sister:
Thank you! I agree. Understanding the needs of others requires putting others first. I do not think that people are wired that way anymoe. Giving in does nothing but breed resentment--not only on the part of the person giving in but also to the person given in to. I do not think that men are stupid. If a woman is not honest with her partner, he can not really give her what she wants. Men are not mind readers.

No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

Heehee. You got me there. I am not a man. I know women can be just as stupid. We pout, cry, withdraw, and answer "nothing" when asked what is wrong. No problem is solved that way. We tell our best friends what we want, need, and fantasize about, but not our spouses. That solves nothing.

I know that men are more goal oriented (problem solvers) than women are. I believe that men go outside the home for sex, usually, only after the man has said "I want more sex" and the woman says or indicates "no" through words or actions. I have to say, if a woman withholds sex as a punishment, she is a farking moron!

On a side note. . .you do not sound stupid :)


And completly asking for trouble as well.
 
2012-06-14 12:28:07 PM

Shakespeare's Sister: SuperChuck: Shakespeare's Sister:
Thank you! I agree. Understanding the needs of others requires putting others first. I do not think that people are wired that way anymoe. Giving in does nothing but breed resentment--not only on the part of the person giving in but also to the person given in to. I do not think that men are stupid. If a woman is not honest with her partner, he can not really give her what she wants. Men are not mind readers.

No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

Heehee. You got me there. I am not a man. I know women can be just as stupid. We pout, cry, withdraw, and answer "nothing" when asked what is wrong. No problem is solved that way. We tell our best friends what we want, need, and fantasize about, but not our spouses. That solves nothing.

I know that men are more goal oriented (problem solvers) than women are. I believe that men go outside the home for sex, usually, only after the man has said "I want more sex" and the woman says or indicates "no" through words or actions. I have to say, if a woman withholds sex as a punishment, she is a farking moron!

On a side note. . .you do not sound stupid :)


Thanks. I just internalize it better than most ;}
 
2012-06-14 01:04:26 PM

SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!


For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill
 
2012-06-14 01:18:25 PM

ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill


You need to recalibrate your sarcasm detector. Note the parenthetical comments.
 
2012-06-14 01:25:34 PM

SuperChuck: Shakespeare's Sister: SuperChuck: Shakespeare's Sister:
Thank you! I agree. Understanding the needs of others requires putting others first. I do not think that people are wired that way anymoe. Giving in does nothing but breed resentment--not only on the part of the person giving in but also to the person given in to. I do not think that men are stupid. If a woman is not honest with her partner, he can not really give her what she wants. Men are not mind readers.

No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

Heehee. You got me there. I am not a man. I know women can be just as stupid. We pout, cry, withdraw, and answer "nothing" when asked what is wrong. No problem is solved that way. We tell our best friends what we want, need, and fantasize about, but not our spouses. That solves nothing.

I know that men are more goal oriented (problem solvers) than women are. I believe that men go outside the home for sex, usually, only after the man has said "I want more sex" and the woman says or indicates "no" through words or actions. I have to say, if a woman withholds sex as a punishment, she is a farking moron!

On a side note. . .you do not sound stupid :)

Thanks. I just internalize it better than most ;}


You are so welcome. Heeheee. I do not know why I giggled there. . .
 
2012-06-14 01:26:49 PM

SuperChuck: ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill

You need to recalibrate your sarcasm detector. Note the parenthetical comments.


I did note them. Acknowledging that it won't help anything doesn't change the fact that the decision to go down that path is handwaved as "because men." Forgive me if you were being sarcastic, but I've known a few people who actually [or at least, pretended very convincingly to] believe such things.
 
2012-06-14 01:30:29 PM

ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill


While it is true that your sarcasm meter needs recalibration, I think you missed the point of the post. Super Chuck can correct me if I am wrong, but. . . it is not the seeking out of sex in the situation described that men cannot help, but rather the problem solving aspect of men that he suggests as the issue. Men are problem solvers, in general. If the direct approach of "I want more sex" does not work to solve the problem, then getting it where it is available will solve the problem of wanting more sex, but it will not address why the lady in question is unwilling to provide. Truthfully, if the woman in question is not willing to be honest, open, and sincere by relating the problem she has causing her to withdraw, then I really cannot blame the man if, after concerted effort, he goes elsewhere. Just because she is okay with a reduced-sex or sexless marriage/relationship does not mean he has to be.
 
2012-06-14 01:31:28 PM

ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill

You need to recalibrate your sarcasm detector. Note the parenthetical comments.

I did note them. Acknowledging that it won't help anything doesn't change the fact that the decision to go down that path is handwaved as "because men." Forgive me if you were being sarcastic, but I've known a few people who actually [or at least, pretended very convincingly to] believe such things.


I think it's more "because stupid" than "because men." Or possibly "because horny." Horny tends to take precedence over a lot of other motivations, even if it goes against one's best interest.
 
2012-06-14 01:34:09 PM

Shakespeare's Sister: ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: No, men are stupid. I know because I am one.

About your earlier statement that men will find what they want, either with you or someone else. That's true. but the reason is that most men are inclined to solve a problem themselves rather than get help. So if he wants sex and his wife isn't providing, instead of saying "hey I wanna have more sex and it's a problem" (which might help) he'll just go find sex somewhere else (which won't really help). Problem solved!

For that to be accurate, it requires that the failing of the relationship not be viewed as a problem. Otherwise you're compounding one problem in solving another rather than attempting to solve both and that's not really much of a solution. You can be as goal oriented as you want, but that approach would just go to show you're bad at picking the goals. Sorry, but that explanation is nothing but a, "bwaa, we can't help it because we're men," excuse and that sort of crap is a disservice to everyone.

/buzzkill

While it is true that your sarcasm meter needs recalibration, I think you missed the point of the post. Super Chuck can correct me if I am wrong, but. . . it is not the seeking out of sex in the situation described that men cannot help, but rather the problem solving aspect of men that he suggests as the issue. Men are problem solvers, in general. If the direct approach of "I want more sex" does not work to solve the problem, then getting it where it is available will solve the problem of wanting more sex, but it will not address why the lady in question is unwilling to provide. Truthfully, if the woman in question is not willing to be honest, open, and sincere by relating the problem she has causing her to withdraw, then I really cannot blame the man if, after concerted effort, he goes elsewhere. Just because she is okay with a reduced-sex or sexless marriage/relationship does not mean he has to be.


Yeah you clarified that better than I did. But I do want to be clear that in most cases, the fault is going to end up being on both sides to some degree. Lack of sex shouldn't be a license to cheat. But it is a valid reason for separation.
 
2012-06-14 01:40:31 PM

SuperChuck: Yeah you clarified that better than I did. But I do want to be clear that in most cases, the fault is going to end up being on both sides to some degree. Lack of sex shouldn't be a license to cheat. But it is a valid reason for separation.


Not going to disagree with that. I was just objecting to the notion that a basic leaning can be used to completely scapegoat poor decisions. If the problem is a sexless relationship, there's two problems - a relationship that's not working and the desire for sex. There is a "good" order and a "aw hell, this is going to blow up in my face" order. That's all.

SuperChuck: Or possibly "because horny." Horny tends to take precedence over a lot of other motivations, even if it goes against one's best interest.


Ha, fine. I'll give you that one.

/Sorry I interrupted
//Go back to flirting or whatever
 
2012-06-14 02:04:44 PM

ProfessorOhki: SuperChuck: Yeah you clarified that better than I did. But I do want to be clear that in most cases, the fault is going to end up being on both sides to some degree. Lack of sex shouldn't be a license to cheat. But it is a valid reason for separation.

Not going to disagree with that. I was just objecting to the notion that a basic leaning can be used to completely scapegoat poor decisions. If the problem is a sexless relationship, there's two problems - a relationship that's not working and the desire for sex. There is a "good" order and a "aw hell, this is going to blow up in my face" order. That's all.

SuperChuck: Or possibly "because horny." Horny tends to take precedence over a lot of other motivations, even if it goes against one's best interest.

Ha, fine. I'll give you that one.

/Sorry I interrupted
//Go back to flirting or whatever


My intent was to explain not excuse. No need to apologize. I'm not always a pig, I just play one on the internet.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled fark.com. Come get some!
 
2012-06-14 02:53:31 PM
Still perving...

Nothing stops the Fark Kinkster Brigade!

They keep perving and perving and perving and perving...
 
DYI
2012-06-14 03:17:03 PM
I love how people think it is their moral duty to come into a thread they know god damn good and well has nothing of interest to them, and spout off about how anyone that doesn't have missionary, lights out, don't make a sound, sex is depraved, immoral, and ranked lower of the life meter than a Catholic Priest.

STFU and go do whatever the fark it is you like doing with your life. The rest of us will be over here playing with our toys and the people that love them used on them.

A wonderful day... I hope you have it.
 
2012-06-14 03:42:35 PM

DYI: I love how people think it is their moral duty to come into a thread they know god damn good and well has nothing of interest to them, and spout off about how anyone that doesn't have missionary, lights out, don't make a sound, sex is depraved, immoral, and ranked lower of the life meter than a Catholic Priest.

STFU and go do whatever the fark it is you like doing with your life. The rest of us will be over here playing with our toys and the people that love them used on them.

A wonderful day... I hope you have it.


Hey now! Catholic Priests probably have a more kinky sex life than you.
 
2012-06-14 04:25:21 PM

Need Help Soonish: Chigau: Need Help Soonish: Mark Ratner:

Ohhh, can i come to?

Sure... Just don't stick your dick in the mashed tatters! It's not gonna be that kind of party :P


DEAL!

/EIP

:D
 
2012-06-14 05:56:54 PM
Saborlas: Still perving...

Nothing stops the Fark Kinkster Brigade!

They keep perving and perving and perving and perving...


There sure are a lot of us...
 
2012-06-14 07:19:01 PM
perve power!
 
2012-06-14 09:48:41 PM
Don't let it die!
 
2012-06-14 09:54:45 PM

Saborlas: Don't let it die!

What would you have me do spank you on a live webcam?
25.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-06-14 09:56:02 PM

tinfoil-hat maggie: What would you have me do spank you on a live webcam?


I haven't ruled it out...
 
2012-06-14 09:56:11 PM
Maybe something the other way around?
24.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-06-14 09:59:41 PM

Saborlas: tinfoil-hat maggie: What would you have me do spank you on a live webcam?

I haven't ruled it out...


That's sorta my moto for life in general :)
 
2012-06-14 10:34:33 PM
Oh and NSFW seems interesting O_o
 
2012-06-14 11:14:05 PM
Somehow it seems odd that this thread is still going, when FL's Fark! group is always so very dead.
 
2012-06-15 12:20:09 AM

Sensei Can You See: Matthew Keene: One time, some years ago I was handcuffed and shackled in a red speedo, and taken out to a restaurant by my dom. Wow, that was quite thrilling. We did get a few looks.

Amateur. :)

[seriousbondage.com image 300x450]


Shufat Market FTW!

/three blocks from my house
 
2012-06-15 11:53:42 AM

Exception Collection: Somehow it seems odd that this thread is still going, when FL's Fark! group is always so very dead.


Feel free to start a conversation or two!
 
2012-06-15 12:34:45 PM

Exception Collection: Somehow it seems odd that this thread is still going, when FL's Fark! group is always so very dead.


And some of us are still lurking, although I did post earlier in the thread.

Finally, I thread I can mark "favorite"!
 
2012-06-15 01:16:54 PM

tinfoil-hat maggie: Saborlas: Don't let it die!
What would you have me do spank you on a live webcam?
[25.media.tumblr.com image 496x700]


You say that like it's a bad thing.
 
2012-06-15 05:14:52 PM
Jiggety jig, I be home.

'Sup fellow pervs?
 
2012-06-15 06:26:24 PM

Saborlas: Jiggety jig, I be home.

'Sup fellow pervs?


Working, but having trouble staying focused due to a certain someone's upcoming, long-anticipated return (geographically speaking).

S'up wit'choo?
 
2012-06-16 04:32:08 PM

Saborlas: Jiggety jig, I be home.

'Sup fellow pervs?


Been watching movies w/ my wife. We decided to kill our cable for a few months, and we're concerned that the DVR won't let us play anything we have on it, so we're trying to clear off the most interesting movies by Monday.

We're taking a break for now while I eat.
 
Displayed 36 of 386 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report