Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo)   In what is clearly a mandate; Gabby Giffords' former aide defeats his Republican challenger to replace her in Congress. You will now be forced to marry a gay turtle or something   (livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 159
    More: Spiffy, Gabrielle Giffords, Republican  
•       •       •

1993 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Jun 2012 at 10:07 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



159 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-06-13 02:09:29 AM  
Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


\Ocelot is a funny word.
\\And I'm not even drinking tonight...
 
2012-06-13 08:22:22 AM  
No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.
 
2012-06-13 09:09:57 AM  
Good work, Arizona
 
2012-06-13 09:20:13 AM  
I'm holding out for a gay fat corgi.
 
2012-06-13 10:08:46 AM  

Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.


I'm still okay with this.
 
2012-06-13 10:09:17 AM  
I think subby's headline was longer than the actual story he linked to.
 
2012-06-13 10:10:28 AM  
I saw a gay turtle.
 
2012-06-13 10:10:39 AM  

Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.


Its all fun and games until you stick your weiner into the toaster. Weiner burn, the new scourge of the gay community.
 
2012-06-13 10:11:18 AM  
Time for Palin to print out some more ..um...surveyor's symbols..
 
2012-06-13 10:11:28 AM  
Why the gay reference?
 
2012-06-13 10:12:18 AM  

Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?


Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.
 
2012-06-13 10:13:09 AM  

Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.


If all toasters toast toast, what does a gay toaster do?
 
2012-06-13 10:13:14 AM  
www.boingboing.net
 
2012-06-13 10:14:45 AM  

cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


\Ocelot is a funny word.
\\And I'm not even drinking tonight...


I've never seen an ocelot!
 
2012-06-13 10:14:57 AM  
I'm glad it went that way. If the Republican won, someone would claim that shooting people works.
 
2012-06-13 10:15:22 AM  
So she doesn't have aids anymore? That biatch is a walking miracle.
 
2012-06-13 10:15:40 AM  

CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]


Surveyors marks.
 
2012-06-13 10:15:48 AM  
what a gay turtle may look like:
i.chzbgr.com
 
2012-06-13 10:15:59 AM  
What? Gerbils are not out of the closet yet. Geere up.

i497.photobucket.com
 
2012-06-13 10:17:06 AM  
Wait...There's news from Arizona...

And it's not absolutely terrible?

file.walagata.com
 
2012-06-13 10:17:36 AM  
something something...coming out of your shell. rimshot.
 
2012-06-13 10:20:13 AM  
Sorry, TPM, but there's no way I have time to read an in-depth article containing all the ins and outs of this fascinating House race. Someone get this author an editor.
 
2012-06-13 10:21:02 AM  
Nice work, Arizona. This could be pointed to if some omnipotent creature, or hostile alien invaders, said to the US "Give us one good reason not to destroy the racist and mysoginistic state of Arizona." I wouldn't point to this, mind you, I'm just saying I could. Fark that shiathole state.
 
2012-06-13 10:21:04 AM  
A Democrat won. Democracy is not dead anymore.
 
2012-06-13 10:21:05 AM  
Waiting for the claims of election fraud.
 
2012-06-13 10:21:49 AM  
Subby is racist against pangolins.
 
2012-06-13 10:22:22 AM  

NeverDrunk23: Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.

If all toasters toast toast, what does a gay toaster do?


Toasters just toast the bread. Gay toasters make sure it's flamin' when it comes out.
 
rmz
2012-06-13 10:23:04 AM  
All I can say is don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, Jesse Kelly.

Both in 2010 and 2012, he's run some of the most hypocritical, pandering and dishonest campaigns that I've ever seen. He actually tried to paint himself as the saintly defender of Medicare while at the same time beating the "wharrgarbl Socialism" and "wharrgarbl Obamacare" drums. He's nothing but a Tea Party line-walker that tries to paint himself as anything but.

But thankfully, the voters saw through it...twice.
 
2012-06-13 10:23:40 AM  

derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.


When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!
 
2012-06-13 10:25:43 AM  

Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.


I thought toasters were female...

/slots
 
2012-06-13 10:25:51 AM  

max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!


Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....
 
2012-06-13 10:26:10 AM  

cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


Archer agrees with you:

2.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-06-13 10:26:26 AM  

CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]


I missed that part of the news cycle. Was Gabrielle Giffords' name actually referenced or something if you moused over one of the Arizona targeting reticules?

Because that would look really, really bad.
 
2012-06-13 10:27:27 AM  

Codenamechaz: Wait...There's news from Arizona...

And it's not absolutely terrible?

[file.walagata.com image 361x365]


Her district is not derper Arizona. There is a reason why the Tucson/Pima County area wants to break off and form their own state. They have idiot snowbirds in Tucson as well, but not nearly as many as Phoenix; the locals are actually reasonable people most of the time, and they have the numbers to usually vote for reasonable politicians. Too bad they're dwarfed by the huge population of idiots to the north.
 
2012-06-13 10:28:40 AM  

cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


\Ocelot is a funny word.
\\And I'm not even drinking tonight...


I was watching a spy documentary once, and long story shot those little fox eared bastards are dicks, don't particularly get sarcasm.
 
rmz
2012-06-13 10:29:38 AM  

oldass31: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

I missed that part of the news cycle. Was Gabrielle Giffords' name actually referenced or something if you moused over one of the Arizona targeting reticules?

Because that would look really, really bad.


Yes. That's where the whole "surveyors' marks" backpedaling thing came from after she was shot.
 
2012-06-13 10:30:13 AM  

Tickle Mittens: I was watching a spy documentary once, and long story shot those little fox eared bastards are dicks, don't particularly get sarcasm.


You know how to tittilate an ocelot?

You oscillate a tit a lot.
 
2012-06-13 10:31:13 AM  

oldass31: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

I missed that part of the news cycle. Was Gabrielle Giffords' name actually referenced or something if you moused over one of the Arizona targeting reticules?

Because that would look really, really bad.


Where it says at the bottom to click to see the list of names, she was on the list.
 
2012-06-13 10:34:15 AM  

oldass31: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

I missed that part of the news cycle. Was Gabrielle Giffords' name actually referenced or something if you moused over one of the Arizona targeting reticules?

Because that would look really, really bad.


It was, but Sarah was just trying to point out that she needed to get "surveyed."
 
2012-06-13 10:34:26 AM  
Don't worry. Given that it's Arizona the GOP will get another shot at it.
 
2012-06-13 10:38:39 AM  

Zasteva: Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.

I thought toasters were female...

/slots


I thought they were fungible.
 
2012-06-13 10:53:31 AM  
What a gay toaster looks like.
images.buddytv.com
 
2012-06-13 10:55:28 AM  

NeverDrunk23: Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.

If all toasters toast toast, what does a gay toaster do?



Shoves his flamboyant gayness down every toast's throat.
 
2012-06-13 10:57:15 AM  

rudemix: max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!

Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....



Well, that...leaves...the rest of us out on a limb.
 
2012-06-13 11:00:31 AM  
So does this mean we should hire more teachers, firefighters, and cops?
 
2012-06-13 11:03:35 AM  
"...Because when gay marriage becomes lawful/I'm gonna find myself a duck/and legally do something awful..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXPcBI4CJc8
 
2012-06-13 11:04:55 AM  

Lord_Baull: rudemix: max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!

Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....


Well, that...leaves...the rest of us out on a limb.


Unbeleafable.
 
2012-06-13 11:07:54 AM  

beta_plus: A candidate won by honest campaigning rather than using a 10:1 cash advantage to blanket the electorate with ads. Democracy is not dead anymore.


Fixed.
 
2012-06-13 11:10:29 AM  

Tyrone Slothrop: So does this mean we should hire more teachers, firefighters, and cops?


Hold up. There are teachers in Arizona?! And they're still like that?
 
2012-06-13 11:10:58 AM  

ArgusRun: cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


\Ocelot is a funny word.
\\And I'm not even drinking tonight...

I've never seen an ocelot!


Holy SH*T, you guys! Look at his tufted ears!
 
2012-06-13 11:11:51 AM  
First good news I've heard all day. Good job, Arizona.
 
2012-06-13 11:12:09 AM  

Mithiwithi: beta_plus: A candidate won by honest campaigning rather than using a 10:1 cash advantage to blanket the electorate with ads. Democracy is not dead anymore.

Fixed.


Walker only outspent Barrett 7:1, you commie.
 
2012-06-13 11:12:29 AM  
I thought they were fungible.
 
2012-06-13 11:19:44 AM  
I knew he had a good shot at winning this.
 
2012-06-13 11:24:22 AM  

NeverDrunk23: Because People in power are Stupid: No, no subby... it's a gay toaster.

If all toasters toast toast, what does a gay toaster do?



It spray tans the bread.
 
2012-06-13 11:25:09 AM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: Lord_Baull: rudemix: max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!

Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....


Well, that...leaves...the rest of us out on a limb.

Unbeleafable.


Wood you guys stop barking so much?

I can't believe what I just sawed, it left me so board.

I pine for the days of clever punning, today's work just saps my will to live. I suppose I just need to branch out to other pursuits. Perhaps that will bear fruit.

Or maybe I'm just nuts.
 
2012-06-13 11:26:41 AM  
tl;dr
 
2012-06-13 11:27:21 AM  

beta_plus: A Democrat won. Democracy is not dead anymore.


You're just mad the shooter didn't kill her.
 
2012-06-13 11:34:00 AM  
B-B-B-but Wisconsin!

*runs to Wisconsin thread*

B-B-B-but Arizona!
 
2012-06-13 11:35:00 AM  
Ha, I was just reading yesterday that this was going to be more of a rejection of Obama and his policies than just replacing Giffords.

/Nicely surprised
 
2012-06-13 11:36:47 AM  

Mithiwithi: beta_plus: A candidate won by honest campaigning rather than using a 10:1 cash advantage to blanket the electorate with ads. Democracy is not dead anymore.

Fixed.


Yeah, all that money did was replicate the election from 2 year ago. It must have been the deciding factor.

/you lost Wisconsin, get over it
//Union money doesn't count
 
2012-06-13 11:38:27 AM  

ArgusRun: I've never seen an ocelot!


Two points.

One, my third grade teacher (who I was in love with) had an ocelot which she would bring to class from time to time. It ate my eraser.

Two, once you go gay turtle, you never come back, which is why I have never gone gay turtle. Forty years later and I'm still in love with my 3rd grade teacher. I'm saving myself for her.
 
2012-06-13 11:38:45 AM  
 
2012-06-13 11:40:28 AM  

Bag of Hammers: B-B-B-but Wisconsin!

*runs to Wisconsin thread*

B-B-B-but Arizona!


*runs to George Thorogoood thread*


B-B-B-Bad to the bone!
 
2012-06-13 11:44:04 AM  

I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.


What is this I don't even.
 
2012-06-13 11:45:49 AM  

EyeballKid: Bag of Hammers: B-B-B-but Wisconsin!

*runs to Wisconsin thread*

B-B-B-but Arizona!

*runs to George Thorogoood thread*


B-B-B-Bad to the bone!


*runs to Micheal J Fox thread*

B-B-B-but S-S-S-stem Cells!
 
2012-06-13 11:53:00 AM  
GOP never really had a shot at him.
 
2012-06-13 11:58:12 AM  
This means that Obama is automatically president and Sarah Palin has to trek around the country in a campaign bus hawking her latest book at run-down shopping malls.

Oh, wait...
 
2012-06-13 11:59:30 AM  

Jackson Herring: I'm holding out for a gay fat corgi.


Listen, if the gay fat corgi of your dreams is any kind of a decent, caring gay fat corgi, he would understand if you experimented, if you dabbled before he came into your life. So, don't waste your life waiting for the gay fat corgi of your dreams. Live a little.
 
2012-06-13 12:01:52 PM  

beta_plus: Mithiwithi: beta_plus: A candidate won by honest campaigning rather than using a 10:1 cash advantage to blanket the electorate with ads. Democracy is not dead anymore.

Fixed.

Yeah, all that money did was replicate the election from 2 year ago. It must have been the deciding factor.

/you lost Wisconsin, get over it
//Union money doesn't count


Serious question for you: Do you think that huge funding disparities help or hinder fair elections?
 
2012-06-13 12:04:29 PM  
So, you do have to literally shoot somebody in the head to get Arizonans to vote sensibly. Good job, AZ!
 
2012-06-13 12:04:36 PM  

Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.


Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.
 
2012-06-13 12:11:17 PM  
Even if the man date goes perfectly, it's a bit premature to be suggesting marriage.
 
2012-06-13 12:12:27 PM  
This means very little. We all know that Arizona is nothing more than a haven for libtards.
 
2012-06-13 12:15:54 PM  

I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.


I do?
 
2012-06-13 12:24:47 PM  

bill4935: What a gay toaster looks like.
[images.buddytv.com image 265x398]


well played.
 
2012-06-13 12:32:23 PM  

CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?


I could have sworn this is like the third time you have posted something similar in the last two weeks. I may be mistaken, if I am I apologize for the libel.
 
2012-06-13 12:33:37 PM  

I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.


And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.
 
2012-06-13 12:38:26 PM  

Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher: Her district is not derper Arizona. There is a reason why the Tucson/Pima County area wants to break off and form their own state. They have idiot snowbirds in Tucson as well, but not nearly as many as Phoenix; the locals are actually reasonable people most of the time, and they have the numbers to usually vote for reasonable politicians. Too bad they're dwarfed by the huge population of idiots to the north.


If you chained and bolted the doors to every Old Country Buffet in Pinal and Maricopa counties and let the seniors all starve to death on the sidewalks, this state would make an immediate swing to the left.

The seniors are what make Arizona a laughingstock. Even the Mormons out in Mesa and Gilbert are sane and moderate compared to them. Folks like Sheriff Joe wouldn't be in office without huge support from old white retirees.

Problem is, with the pending retirement of so many Baby Boomers, the problem will only get worse before it gets better. I expect that you guys down in Pima county are going to see it as well. Huge swing to the right for 30 or 40 years before things mellow out. I'm not looking forward to it.
 
2012-06-13 12:38:59 PM  

Deucednuisance: "Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.


He was both left wing and right wing.

/Depending on the day.
 
2012-06-13 12:39:41 PM  

Deucednuisance: I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.


I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.
 
2012-06-13 12:41:52 PM  

I alone am best: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?

I could have sworn this is like the third time you have posted something similar in the last two weeks. I may be mistaken, if I am I apologize for the libel.


I was it was Hotwingconspiracy sorry.
 
2012-06-13 12:50:39 PM  

derpdeederp: He was both left wing and right wing.


The farker could fly!

I alone am best: I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.


See? there it is, just like I said it would be!

Because "people who knew him" in High School are so relevant to understanding the politics of a currently schizophrenic adult.

Because advocating a return to the Gold Standard and making English the official language are such "left wing" ideas!

Howzabout a nice cite?
 
2012-06-13 12:54:01 PM  

Deucednuisance: derpdeederp: He was both left wing and right wing.

The farker could fly!

I alone am best: I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.

See? there it is, just like I said it would be!

Because "people who knew him" in High School are so relevant to understanding the politics of a currently schizophrenic adult.

Because advocating a return to the Gold Standard and making English the official language are such "left wing" ideas!

Howzabout a nice cite?


His anti-federal, pro-gold standard, English official language, anti-Iraq war views align him perfectly with the Ron/Rand Paul set of the Republican Party. He is no more "left wing" than Ron Paul.
 
2012-06-13 12:56:51 PM  

I alone am best: I alone am best: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?

I could have sworn this is like the third time you have posted something similar in the last two weeks. I may be mistaken, if I am I apologize for the libel.

I was it was Hotwingconspiracy sorry.


Aw cmon our handles look nothing alike
 
2012-06-13 12:56:52 PM  

I alone am best: Deucednuisance: I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.

I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.


No, they didn't make it up. They based their opinion on a superficial understanding of "right" vs. left" informed almost solely by his anti-Iraq War, pro-marijuana views.

His views align him with the libertarian/Ron/Rand Paul set.
 
2012-06-13 01:05:19 PM  

CPennypacker: I alone am best: I alone am best: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?

I could have sworn this is like the third time you have posted something similar in the last two weeks. I may be mistaken, if I am I apologize for the libel.

I was it was Hotwingconspiracy sorry.

Aw cmon our handles look nothing alike


You guys both have the same color on my favorites list.
 
2012-06-13 01:07:00 PM  

CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?


Maybe, Maybe not. However, I do think the Gabrielle Giffords correctly predicted in a 2010 CNN Interview that the actions like Sarah Pailn's could cause consequences.
 
2012-06-13 01:08:01 PM  

bugontherug: I alone am best: Deucednuisance: I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.

I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.

No, they didn't make it up. They based their opinion on a superficial understanding of "right" vs. left" informed almost solely by his anti-Iraq War, pro-marijuana views.

His views align him with the libertarian/Ron/Rand Paul set.


He also enjoyed The Communist Manifesto, burning American flags, was a truther and had an alter set up in his back yard.
 
2012-06-13 01:10:38 PM  

sonorangal: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?

Maybe, Maybe not. However, I do think the Gabrielle Giffords correctly predicted in a 2010 CNN Interview that the actions like Sarah Pailn's could cause consequences.


I will leave this one to Deucednuisance. I guess he is in the mood to tell others that Loughner was a nut ball and politics didn't have anything to do with the shooting.

Go for it bro, let him know.
 
2012-06-13 01:14:09 PM  

bugontherug: I alone am best: Deucednuisance: I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.

I see, people who knew him must have made that up as part of the VRWC.

No, they didn't make it up. They based their opinion on a superficial understanding of "right" vs. left" informed almost solely by his anti-Iraq War, pro-marijuana views.

His views align him with the libertarian/Ron/Rand Paul set.


If he was supporting Bob Barr for president I would agree but he was supporting Kerry.
 
2012-06-13 01:15:45 PM  

I alone am best: bugontherug: I alone am best: Deucednuisance: I alone am best: So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

And, as in every post, you make shiat up, and when called on it, assert that words' common definitions don't count, and only your understanding of them is correct.

"Left wing"? That's as unfounded and ridiculous as claiming Loughner was "right wing".

He was (and remains) schizophrenic.


Schizophrenics aren't apolitical.


i alone troll best
He also enjoyed The Communist Manifesto,

This is not a political view.

burning American flags, was a truther


Both of which are consistent with libertarianism, and the latter is consistent with the right wing sovereign citizen movement.

and had an alter set up in his back yard.

This is not a political view.
 
2012-06-13 01:19:09 PM  

bill4935: What a gay toaster looks like.
[images.buddytv.com image 265x398]


You. I like you. Post more funny.
 
2012-06-13 01:20:29 PM  

I alone am best: If he was supporting Bob Barr for president I would agree but he was supporting Kerry.


Citation needed.
 
2012-06-13 01:25:23 PM  
A Democrat won, and that means he has a mandate to do whatever he wants.

That is what people in America actually believe about elections today.
 
2012-06-13 01:30:32 PM  

bugontherug: Schizophrenics aren't apolitical.


True enough, but they are all over the map, which is why I'm saying it is foolish to ascribe him to any kind of "wing" at all.

I alone am best: I will leave this one to Deucednuisance. I guess he is in the mood to tell others that Loughner was a nut ball and politics didn't have anything to do with the shooting.


Oh, you!

You alone really are best, way better than the phalanx of doctors who diagnosed him as schizophrenic, and the trial judge who found him incompetent to stand trial. Who did I think I was listening to them instead of you? He's as sane as rain, man!

As to it having to do with politics, of course it was political. He shot a farking politician! Why didn't I listen to a girl who knew him in High School, years before he started showing sign of mental illness? That would explain what he was thinking, years later!

Jeebus.

I've said it three times already: He was neither "left wing" nor "right wing". He was farking crazy and his thoughts, political and otherwise were all over the map. I think the many examples trotted out in this thread prove that: they're inconsistent and disjointed, and certainly not attributable to any "wing".

Can't you farking read?
 
2012-06-13 01:35:12 PM  

bugontherug: I alone am best: If he was supporting Bob Barr for president I would agree but he was supporting Kerry.

Citation needed.


I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.
 
2012-06-13 01:37:54 PM  

bugontherug: I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.



Oooh....

Awk-ward...
 
2012-06-13 01:39:36 PM  

Deucednuisance: God Is My Co-Pirate: Lord_Baull: rudemix: max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!

Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....


Well, that...leaves...the rest of us out on a limb.

Unbeleafable.

Wood you guys stop barking so much?

I can't believe what I just sawed, it left me so board.

I pine for the days of clever punning, today's work just saps my will to live. I suppose I just need to branch out to other pursuits. Perhaps that will bear fruit.

Or maybe I'm just nuts.


No, I'm definitely rooting for you.
 
2012-06-13 01:40:06 PM  

Deucednuisance: bugontherug: I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.


Oooh....

Awk-ward...


Heh.
 
2012-06-13 01:45:25 PM  
I'm marrying the Eiffel Tower!
 
2012-06-13 01:46:26 PM  

Deucednuisance: I've said it three times already: He was neither "left wing" nor "right wing". He was farking crazy and his thoughts, political and otherwise were all over the map. I think the many examples trotted out in this thread prove that: they're inconsistent and disjointed, and certainly not attributable to any "wing".

Can't you farking read?


Two other people in the thread have stated something that you apparently find untrue, but you keep attacking me about it. Why would that be? Why don't you quote them and tell them that what they are saying doesn't hold water?

You can go through my posts if you like and find where I have stated the exact same thing that you are saying. I just respond in kind to some posts. This was one of them. Liberals on this site like to try and make him some sort of right wing wacko who went on a killing spree at the behest of Sarah Palin. So instead of posting the same "he was just a nutball" over and over I have taken to repeating the opposite of those who are obviously trying to deceive others.

Additionally, he was showing signs of mental illness when he asked Gabby Giffords in 2007 "How do you know words have meaning" and she responded in spanish which is actually what set off his obsession with killing her.
 
2012-06-13 01:53:43 PM  

Deucednuisance: I've said it three times already: He was neither "left wing" nor "right wing". He was farking crazy and his thoughts, political and otherwise were all over the map.


I can't really agree with this. Things that are being attributed to Loughner as evidence of "left wing" fit a larger pattern which aligns him most closely with the Ron/Rand Paul set of the Republican Party.

Ron Paul:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) sponsored a bill to end marijuana prohibition,
5) sponsored a bill to make English the official language.

Jared Loughner:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard (who else other than Ron Paul supporters even think about this issue?)
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) favors marijuana legalization,
5) favors making English the official language.

Only "likes the Communist Manifesto" seems inconsistent with the proposition that Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative. But that's not really a political view, and Communism is incompatible with Loughner's anti-federal, pro-gold stanard, English official language views.
 
2012-06-13 01:54:50 PM  

I alone am best: Two other people in the thread have stated something that you apparently find untrue, but you keep attacking me about it. Why would that be? Why don't you quote them and tell them that what they are saying doesn't hold water?


Because you bug me, man.
 
2012-06-13 01:56:44 PM  

bugontherug: I can't really agree with this.


I should qualify. Loughner was clearly crazy. But his political views align him with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism.
 
2012-06-13 01:58:14 PM  

bugontherug: I can't really agree with this. Things that are being attributed to Loughner as evidence of "left wing" fit a larger pattern which aligns him most closely with the Ron/Rand Paul set of the Republican Party.


You make a cogent argument, but what "wing" would that be, "left" or "right"? That's all I am arguing.

And aligning with Paul-ian libertarianism does not argue against "crazy".

It rather confirms it, if you ask me.
 
2012-06-13 02:00:32 PM  

bugontherug: Deucednuisance: I've said it three times already: He was neither "left wing" nor "right wing". He was farking crazy and his thoughts, political and otherwise were all over the map.

I can't really agree with this. Things that are being attributed to Loughner as evidence of "left wing" fit a larger pattern which aligns him most closely with the Ron/Rand Paul set of the Republican Party.

Ron Paul:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) sponsored a bill to end marijuana prohibition,
5) sponsored a bill to make English the official language.

Jared Loughner:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard (who else other than Ron Paul supporters even think about this issue?)
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) favors marijuana legalization,
5) favors making English the official language.

Only "likes the Communist Manifesto" seems inconsistent with the proposition that Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative. But that's not really a political view, and Communism is incompatible with Loughner's anti-federal, pro-gold stanard, English official language views.


Also noteworthy: Ron Paul opposed an amendment to ban flag burning, which is again consistent with Loughner.
 
2012-06-13 02:01:58 PM  
And frankly, I think it's Loughner's rather Paranoid streak in his flavor of schizophrenia that explains the assassination attempt more than any political beef. Gifford's response didn't give him the respect he thought he deserved.
 
2012-06-13 02:04:58 PM  

Deucednuisance: You make a cogent argument, but what "wing" would that be, "left" or "right"? That's all I am arguing.


It's a subset of right wing. Today's libertarians, states righters, etc., align themselves primarily with the right. It's a variation on "small government." There's a reason Dr. Paul is a Republican.

We can also look to the absence of certain views from Loughner's expressed ideas.

1) There's no evidence universal health care mattered to him.
2) There's no evidence the environment mattered to him.
3) There's no evidence helping minorities mattered to him.

Etc. There's no views that are attributable to him that aren't also attributable to the Ron/Rand Paul set.

And aligning with Paul-ian libertarianism does not argue against "crazy".

I think we can find some common ground here.
 
2012-06-13 02:05:24 PM  

Deucednuisance: I alone am best: Two other people in the thread have stated something that you apparently find untrue, but you keep attacking me about it. Why would that be? Why don't you quote them and tell them that what they are saying doesn't hold water?

Because you bug me, man.


Why is that? Is it because the distortion I am trying to sell would make Liberals look bad? So, when a liberal tries to sell that same distortion about conservatives its OK by you, but when I reverse it then I am just a horrible person or something?
 
2012-06-13 02:09:44 PM  

I alone am best: Why is that? Is it because the distortion I am trying to sell would make Liberals look bad? So, when a liberal tries to sell that same distortion about conservatives its OK by you, but when I reverse it then I am just a horrible person or something?


No, it's that you're so insufferably smug about it, and you do it so often.

This ain't my first day at the rodeo, Cowboy. I've seen you ride before.
 
2012-06-13 02:11:47 PM  
Remember kids according to the Republican spin:

The Vote for a RECALL for a governor that was mostly based on Labor and Union: Totally referendum on OBAMA!!!

The vote in AZ for a congressman that the Republicans totally turned into a "He will support OBAMA if elected!!!" Campaign : Totally not a referendum on Obama or the presidential election.
 
2012-06-13 02:13:30 PM  

bugontherug: Deucednuisance: bugontherug: I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.


Oooh....

Awk-ward...

Heh.


Link
Link
 
2012-06-13 02:14:49 PM  

Corvus: Remember kids according to the Republican spin:

The Vote for a RECALL for a governor that was mostly based on Labor and Union: Totally referendum on OBAMA!!!

The vote in AZ for a congressman that the Republicans totally turned into a "He will support OBAMA if elected!!!" Campaign : Totally not a referendum on Obama or the presidential election.


Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?
 
2012-06-13 02:20:04 PM  

I alone am best: bugontherug: Deucednuisance: bugontherug: I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.


Oooh....

Awk-ward...

Heh.

Link
Link


Yes, I was already aware of those links. The first one contains the assertion in the headline, but does not follow up in its article. The second one contains an unverifiable one line assertion in what is clearly an opinion piece.

Go back and come back with a "credible" source, please. A "credible source" contains tidbits like "who, what, when, where, how, and why." In this case, "who of Lougner's friends said this," "what actually did he say," "in what context did he say it," etc.

At this point, the proposition that Loughner supported John Kerry is as unsupported as it was before.
 
2012-06-13 02:30:57 PM  

I alone am best: Why is that? Is it because the distortion I am trying to sell would make Liberals look bad? So, when a liberal tries to sell that same distortion about conservatives its OK by you, but when I reverse it then I am just a horrible person or something?


So you admit your argument is a distortion. Case closed on your argument.

I'm not trying to "sell" any "distortion," but rather honestly express my view that Loughner's politics are identifiable as a subset conservatism, to wit: Ron/Rand Paul conservatism.

So far, none of Jared Loughner's identified political views are inconsistent with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism. while core aspects of his stated philosophy run counter to basic tenets of modern progressivism. The best evidence so far is that Jared Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative.
 
2012-06-13 02:32:55 PM  

bugontherug: I alone am best: bugontherug: Deucednuisance: bugontherug: I gather you can find no credible citation for this assertion. When I google "Jared Loughner supported John Kerry," this is what comes up:

Link

Incredibly, not even the conservative media appear to have picked up on this key fact.


Oooh....

Awk-ward...

Heh.

Link
Link

Yes, I was already aware of those links. The first one contains the assertion in the headline, but does not follow up in its article. The second one contains an unverifiable one line assertion in what is clearly an opinion piece.

Go back and come back with a "credible" source, please. A "credible source" contains tidbits like "who, what, when, where, how, and why." In this case, "who of Lougner's friends said this," "what actually did he say," "in what context did he say it," etc.

At this point, the proposition that Loughner supported John Kerry is as unsupported as it was before.


There is no way to cite it as loughner was unknown prior to the shooting of Gabby Giffords and no information has come out about it since. The only information that is available is the statements of his friends which infer that he supported Kerry against Bush.
 
2012-06-13 02:42:01 PM  

The Name: So, you do have to literally shoot somebody in the head to get Arizonans to vote sensibly. Good job, AZ!


No, we elected Gabby to Congress. Thrice.

I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?


No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.
 
2012-06-13 02:43:31 PM  

I alone am best: The only information that is available is the statements of his friends which infer that he supported Kerry against Bush.


So, this was early-mid 2004, prior to the onset of his mental illness. Relevance, please?

While you're at it, explain why a "left wing" adherent would shoot a liberal Democrat.

I mean, that sounds, you know, crazy!
 
2012-06-13 02:45:15 PM  

I alone am best: There is no way to cite it as loughner was unknown prior to the shooting of Gabby Giffords and no information has come out about it since. The only information that is available is the statements of his friends which infer


Okay, so now we're down to statements of unidentified "friends" who you say only "inferred" Loughner supported Kerry in 2004. And you can't even find a credible source which identifies which of Loughner's friends talked about this "inference," to whom, in what context, etc.

I'm satisfied, as is any reasonable reader, that there is no credible evidence supporting the proposition that Loughner supported John Kerry in 2004.

However, we do know that his known political views are almost entirely consistent with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, and that certain of his views, like his hatred of the federal government, and desire to return to the gold standard, are strongly at odds with modern progressivism.
 
2012-06-13 02:48:22 PM  

Deucednuisance: I alone am best: The only information that is available is the statements of his friends which infer that he supported Kerry against Bush.

So, this was early-mid 2004, prior to the onset of his mental illness. Relevance, please?

While you're at it, explain why a "left wing" adherent would shoot a liberal Democrat.

I mean, that sounds, you know, crazy!


He's already admitted he doesn't believe his own argument. He's called the proposition that Loughner is left wing a "distortion" that he's trying to "sell."

I'm selling no distortion, but honestly advocating my real beliefs based on actual evidence.
 
2012-06-13 03:11:32 PM  

Cndn Bacon: cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?

Archer agrees with you:

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 500x321]


i1237.photobucket.com

Bruce agrees with you too.

/have wanted an ocelot as a pet ever since
//obsolete unless you are old
 
2012-06-13 03:11:43 PM  

bugontherug:
However, we do know that his known political views are almost entirely consistent with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, and that certain of his views, like his hatred of the federal government, and desire to return to the gold standard, are strongly at odds with modern progressivism.


Just as much as far left liberals disliked and distrusted federal government when they thought that there was a conspiracy to fly jets into the world trade center? The only thing that you have stated that lends any credence to the argument for him being a libertatian is that Loughner was for returning to the gold standard. Where many of Loughners views are congruent with libertarianism they are more commonly attributed to liberals.

Additionally the friend that is quoted is not unidentified. Her name is Caitie Parker.
 
2012-06-13 03:33:18 PM  

I alone am best: Just as much as far left liberals disliked and distrusted federal government when they thought that there was a conspiracy to fly jets into the world trade center?


You're really desperate. 9/11 produced no left wing ideological opposition to the federal government of the kind evinced by conservatives like Jared Loughner.


The only thing that you have stated that lends any credence to the argument for him being a libertatian is that Loughner was for returning to the gold standard. Where many of Loughners views are congruent with libertarianism they are more commonly attributed to liberals.


All of Loughner's known political views comport with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism. None of Loughner's known political views are incompatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservative. Key aspects of Loughner's political views are at odds with central progressive tenets. To be clear:

Jared Loughner:

1) dislikes the federal government--this is incompatible with progressivism--
2) wants to return to the gold standard--so is this
3) opposed the Iraq War--this is compatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, as well as progressivism
4) wants to end marijuana prohibition, so is this
5) wants to make English the official language, this is compatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, and incompatible with progressivism.

Ron Paul:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard (who else other than Ron Paul supporters even think about this issue?)
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) favors marijuana legalization,
5) favors making English the official language.

Thus, Jared Loughner's views are compatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, and incompatible with progressivism. Jared Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative.


Additionally the friend that is quoted is not unidentified. Her name is Caitie Parker.


We already know you're willing to "sell" a "distortion." So I'm not going to believe anything you say without a credible source. Link me to an article which quotes Caitie Parker saying Loughner supported John Kerry. The article you've linked to does not.
 
2012-06-13 03:45:10 PM  
//obsolete unless you are old

Or obscure even. Don't even know where that came from.
 
2012-06-13 03:46:18 PM  
You should stop trying to sell the distortion (your words) that Jared Loughner is left wing, and instead buy the objective reality that Jared Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative.

BBL.
 
2012-06-13 03:54:01 PM  

bugontherug: I alone am best: Just as much as far left liberals disliked and distrusted federal government when they thought that there was a conspiracy to fly jets into the world trade center?

You're really desperate. 9/11 produced no left wing ideological opposition to the federal government of the kind evinced by conservatives like Jared Loughner.


The only thing that you have stated that lends any credence to the argument for him being a libertatian is that Loughner was for returning to the gold standard. Where many of Loughners views are congruent with libertarianism they are more commonly attributed to liberals.

All of Loughner's known political views comport with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism. None of Loughner's known political views are incompatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservative. Key aspects of Loughner's political views are at odds with central progressive tenets. To be clear:

Jared Loughner:

1) dislikes the federal government--this is incompatible with progressivism--
2) wants to return to the gold standard--so is this
3) opposed the Iraq War--this is compatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, as well as progressivism
4) wants to end marijuana prohibition, so is this
5) wants to make English the official language, this is compatible with Ron/Rand Paul conservatism, and incompatible with progressivism.

Ron Paul:

1) dislikes the federal government,
2) wants to return to the gold standard (who else other than Ron Paul supporters even think about this issue?)
3) opposed the Iraq War,
4) favors marijuana legalization,
5) favors making English the official language.

Additionally the friend that is quoted is not unidentified. Her name is Caitie Parker.

We already know you're willing to "sell" a "distortion." So I'm not going to believe anything you say without a credible source. Link me to an article which ...


Provide a citation for him wanting english to be the official language because I cannot find one.

Let me make my own list.

1) dislikes the federal government-- I am going to stand by this as you obvously have not met many truthers.
2) wants to return to the gold standard-- This is the only thing that he and any type of conservatives have in common.
3) opposed the Iraq War--this is mainly opposed by the left and somewhat by libertarians.
4) wants to end marijuana prohibition, this could swing both ways but libertarians want all drugs legalized.
5) Likes to burn flags. -- This is perpetrated mostly by liberals and I really cant find any examples of libertarians doing it.
6) Listing The communist manifesto as a favorite -- No libertarian or conservative would ever say this.
7) Anti-Bush -- Once again mostly attributed to liberals.

As for Catie Parker

Link
 
2012-06-13 03:59:36 PM  

bugontherug: You should stop trying to sell the distortion (your words) that Jared Loughner is left wing, and instead buy the objective reality that Jared Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative.

BBL.


For one, the only reason it was a distortion is because Loughner was a nut ball. You may not be trying to distort anything and may actually believe what you're saying, however you would be wrong. Also, Libertarian and conservative are not the same thing so by your assistance with interchanging the two leads me to believe that you are trying to sell a distortion or you are not sure what you're talking about to begin with.
 
2012-06-13 04:00:39 PM  
assistance= insistence:(
 
2012-06-13 04:05:05 PM  

demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.


He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.
 
2012-06-13 04:09:37 PM  

Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.


I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.
 
2012-06-13 04:12:03 PM  

I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.


To be fair, anyone with a heart or a mind is already a liberal.
 
2012-06-13 04:15:48 PM  

I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.


And we just gave you an answer!! And this entire thread you've been making up BS.

Hey how is your child rape case going? -- Oh I am just "asking questions".
 
2012-06-13 04:17:10 PM  

I alone am best: Corvus: Remember kids according to the Republican spin:

The Vote for a RECALL for a governor that was mostly based on Labor and Union: Totally referendum on OBAMA!!!

The vote in AZ for a congressman that the Republicans totally turned into a "He will support OBAMA if elected!!!" Campaign : Totally not a referendum on Obama or the presidential election.

Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?


NOPE!

Analysts say that's a significant margin considering that the district voted for Republicans the last two presidential elections and that Kelly very nearly unseated Giffords in the 2010 campaign.
 
2012-06-13 04:18:18 PM  
Wasn't Ron Paul wanted at some time for molesting children?

/"Just asking question"
 
2012-06-13 04:21:34 PM  

Corvus: I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.

And we just gave you an answer!! And this entire thread you've been making up BS.

Hey how is your child rape case going? -- Oh I am just "asking questions".


You must be a lot of fun at parties.
 
2012-06-13 04:30:58 PM  

CPennypacker: I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.

To be fair, anyone with a heart or a mind is already a liberal.


As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.
 
2012-06-13 04:32:04 PM  

I alone am best: Corvus: I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.

And we just gave you an answer!! And this entire thread you've been making up BS.

Hey how is your child rape case going? -- Oh I am just "asking questions".

You must be a lot of fun at parties.


I am "just asking questions" like you, so why are you so bent out of shape?

I love your type. You pull your shiat and then first time someone pulls the same shiat on you, you start crying.
 
2012-06-13 04:32:36 PM  

I alone am best: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.

To be fair, anyone with a heart or a mind is already a liberal.

As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.


Oh, also anyone with a sense of humor
 
2012-06-13 04:32:56 PM  

I alone am best: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Corvus: demaL-demaL-yeH: I alone am best: Corvus:
Wasn't it a liberal district anyway?

No. Registered Republicans have a 6% edge in AZ CD8 - redistricting kicks in for the general election in November.

He will just make up any "facts" that he can maintain his worldview.

I was asking a question.

/Liberals always winning hearts and minds.

To be fair, anyone with a heart or a mind is already a liberal.

As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.


I am just SO unfair by doing the thing you did back at you. That is SO unfair. Only you should be allowed to do that.
 
2012-06-13 04:35:47 PM  

I alone am best: As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.


So far all I have demonstrated are the following you consider are unfair and mean:
- People showing your question implying something false was wrong
- People using that same tactic that you used back at you.
 
2012-06-13 04:37:10 PM  

I alone am best: As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.


So far all I have demonstrated are the following you consider unfair and mean:
- People showing your question implying something false was wrong
- People using that same tactic that you used back at you.
 
2012-06-13 04:50:43 PM  

Corvus: I alone am best: As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.

So far all I have demonstrated are the following you consider unfair and mean:
- People showing your question implying something false was wrong
- People using that same tactic that you used back at you.


Please tell me you have been drinking or have PTSD.
 
2012-06-13 04:51:03 PM  
For those of you making lists comparing a certain goldbug libertardian to a mass murderer, you keep forgetting the most striking similarity:
RON PAUL is also nuckin' futs.
 
2012-06-13 04:57:37 PM  

bugontherug: You should stop trying to sell the distortion (your words) that Jared Loughner is left wing, and instead buy the objective reality that Jared Loughner is a Ron/Rand Paul conservative.

BBL.


I take it you cannot provide a credible citation for Loughner wanted English to be the official language.
 
2012-06-13 04:58:55 PM  

I alone am best: Corvus: I alone am best: As demonstrated by Corvus in the post directly after yours.

So far all I have demonstrated are the following you consider unfair and mean:
- People showing your question implying something false was wrong
- People using that same tactic that you used back at you.

Please tell me you have been drinking or have PTSD.


So instead of you actually addressing my points you ignore them and insult. Why do you think that is?
 
2012-06-13 05:01:09 PM  

I alone am best: /Liberals always winning hearts and minds.


TO this:


I alone am best: Please tell me you have been drinking or have PTSD.


I see, pointing out facts and that you are wrong you consider "insults" however you just insulting people is perfectly fine.
 
2012-06-13 05:02:40 PM  

I alone am best: I take it you cannot provide a credible citation for Loughner wanted English to be the official language.


Why is it that everyone else needs citation and then when they provide them you then dismiss them? All while you never give any citation for your accusations?
 
2012-06-13 06:01:36 PM  

I alone am best: 1) dislikes the federal government-- I am going to stand by this as you obvously have not met many truthers.
2) wants to return to the gold standard-- This is the only thing that he and any type of conservatives have in common.
3) opposed the Iraq War--this is mainly opposed by the left and somewhat by libertarians.
4) wants to end marijuana prohibition, this could swing both ways but libertarians want all drugs legalized.
5) Likes to burn flags. -- This is perpetrated mostly by liberals and I really cant find any examples of libertarians doing it.
6) Listing The communist manifesto as a favorite -- No libertarian or conservative would ever say this.
7) Anti-Bush -- Once again mostly attributed to liberals.

As for Catie Parker

Link


First off, your arguments here are pathetic. Among other things, Loughner listed Ayn Rand as a favorite author, which undercuts your argument he was left as surely as the Communist Manifesto undercuts the argument he was right. Which is to say it doesn't, because he offered no reason for why he liked either one, which could have to do with other than the political views expressed.

Second off, you are a dishonest person. The issue isn't whether Catie Parker exists. It is whether she or anyone else said Jared Loughner supported Kerry in 2004. She did not. Neither did anyone else.
 
2012-06-13 08:04:43 PM  
I alone am wurst 2012-06-13 12:04:36 PM

Harabrlarlbrlbbrbalbrbalrlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbghrghlarlbrlbbrb
albrbalrlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbghrghlarlbrlbbrbalbrbalrlrblabblb
arlbrlrblrlbbg hrghlarlbrlbbrbalbrbalrlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbghrgh
brlarlbrlbbrbalbrbal rlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbghrghlarlbrlbbr say,
this formatting kinda sucks balbrbalrlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbgh
rghlarlbrlbbrbalbrbalrlrblabbrlarlbrl bbrbalbrbalrlrblabblbar
lbrlrblrlbbrl all right this is getting really boring now bghrgh larlbrlbbrbalbrbalrlrblabblbarlbrlrblrlbbghrghlarlbrlbbrb
albrbalrlrbl durty libruls!!
 
2012-06-13 08:18:13 PM  

sonorangal: CPennypacker: I alone am best: Fart_Machine: I alone am best: CPennypacker: [www.boingboing.net image 640x425]

When your party caters to lunatics you take that risk.

What is this I don't even.

Cpennypacker likes to blame Sarah Palin for the acts of Loughner. Its clear that Loughner was a nut and that Sarah Palins stupid map didnt have anything to do with his decision to go on a murderous rampage. So every time someone says he was a right wing nutball I point out he was actually a left wing nutball.

I do?

Maybe, Maybe not. However, I do think the Gabrielle Giffords correctly predicted in a 2010 CNN Interview that the actions like Sarah Pailn's could cause consequences.


Go to 2:15 for a creepy walk in the past
 
2012-06-13 09:25:19 PM  
My spouse is a gay turtle, so I'm getting a kick...

\mmm turtygamy
 
2012-06-13 11:12:40 PM  
What an ocelot might look like:
2.bp.blogspot.com

what?
 
2012-06-14 02:40:16 AM  
For old time's sake:

i50.tinypic.com
 
2012-06-14 03:17:32 AM  

Veloram: Deucednuisance: God Is My Co-Pirate: Lord_Baull: rudemix: max_pooper: derpdeederp: Lord_Baull: Why the gay reference?

Because whenever the Democrats win gay marriage is forced on everyone.

When Obama was inaugurated, his FEMA goons came to my house and forced me to gay marry a tree. I got a splinter in my wang during consummation. When I went to the hospital, Obama's death panel gave me the thumbs down. I died two days later of a severe case of powdery mildew.

Damn you Fartbama!!!

Sounds like you got right to...
*glasses*
the root of the problem....


Well, that...leaves...the rest of us out on a limb.

Unbeleafable.

Wood you guys stop barking so much?

I can't believe what I just sawed, it left me so board.

I pine for the days of clever punning, today's work just saps my will to live. I suppose I just need to branch out to other pursuits. Perhaps that will bear fruit.

Or maybe I'm just nuts.

No, I'm definitely rooting for you.


Maple a photo to synthesis the information would help. There is no need to twig out, just stick to it and we can sprout a new idea that could flower into action.
 
2012-06-14 12:16:10 PM  

I alone am best: Provide a citation for him wanting english to be the official language because I cannot find one.


Then you have no right to be so smug, because you are lame.

I already provided it in a post that you complained mightily about. Which link you have ignored and say doesn't exist, so I'll be damned if I'll google it again for your whiny ass.

It's a freaking YouTube clip, it's in his own words, speaking to the camera.

Go ahead, refute that. I double dog dare you.
 
2012-06-14 12:21:14 PM  
"In over 150 years of human attempts at replicating this accidental process, we have not even come close to doing so."

Oh Really?

We proved in the farking 50's that the compounds present in early earth atmosphere could spontaneously generate what we now call Amino Acids. In fact, we managed to create 20 of them from scratch! Using the hypothesized processes that this dildo is denying were at work... More recently, about 2 years ago, scientists were able to take a bacterial cell, replicate its inorganic structure (eliminating the presence of DNA, RNA and all the requisite Chromosomes), create a replacement chromosome using the process described above, and insert that base instruction into the inorganic cell.

They referred to the process as Booting Up the cell.

It's one thing to be ignorant. That's fine. But to ignorantly spout your ignorance in front of an audience of fellow ignorants?

Fark yourself, WND. Hard. Your premise is bunk. As usual.
 
2012-06-14 12:24:45 PM  
I'm ashamed! Misfire! Wrong thread! Abort Abort! Duck and Cover
 
2012-06-14 12:27:53 PM  

cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?


\Ocelot is a funny word.
\\And I'm not even drinking tonight...


Cndn Bacon: cptjeff: Does it have to be a turtle, or can I go with the ocelot?

Archer agrees with you:

[2.bp.blogspot.com image 500x321]


hahaha! Oh my god! Look at his spots! And his tufted ears!

/probably my second favorite line in that show.
//First is:
"What is the lesson here?"
"If you want something done right, you hire a Nazi to do it."
"That's a TERRIBLE lesson!"
"Well maybe you should hire a Nazi to come up with a better one."
 
Displayed 159 of 159 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report