If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The New York Times)   Salt, bad for you? Nope, never was   (nytimes.com) divider line 6
    More: Interesting, dietary guidelines, best evidence rules, Health Administration, salts, Robert Wood, Department of Agriculture  
•       •       •

8067 clicks; posted to Geek » on 10 Jun 2012 at 10:20 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-06-10 11:40:22 AM
2 votes:
i105.photobucket.com
Some of the substances that our bodies need can actually be detrimental if we consume too much of them.
2012-06-10 03:17:25 PM
1 votes:
pretprieel.nl
2012-06-10 12:32:53 PM
1 votes:
Yotto: notmtwain: rudemix: Salt itself was not a worry for me. The obscene amounts found in most restaurant and packaged foods was.

Well, since you now know that there is no such thing as an obscene amount of salt in restaurant or packaged foods (that would be like complaining about an obscene amount of beef in a hamburger or wheat flour in a piece of bread), you can rid yourself of such obscene worries and stick to your own personal taste as a guideline.

// If you don't like the taste, that's fine, but it doesn't make it obscene.

This is at least kinda obscene.

[thechive.files.wordpress.com image 500x375]


images2.wikia.nocookie.net
2012-06-10 12:17:36 PM
1 votes:
mutantreviewers.files.wordpress.com

Can you believe people in the 20th century actually thought salt was bad for you?
2012-06-10 11:36:14 AM
1 votes:
I think TFA needs to be taken with a grain of... aw, forget it
2012-06-10 10:40:13 AM
1 votes:
uploads.neatorama.com
 
Displayed 6 of 6 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report