If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Kansas has just farked itself   (www2.ljworld.com) divider line 531
    More: Dumbass, just society, Sam Brownback, Professors in the United States, University of Kansas, tax laws, working-classes  
•       •       •

13529 clicks; posted to Politics » on 28 May 2012 at 11:40 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



531 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-05-28 02:23:26 AM
i.imgur.com
 
2012-05-28 03:37:21 AM
Again??
 
2012-05-28 03:42:18 AM
Jesus Christ. Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls. But they'll cut education spending to make up the $4.5 BILLION loss in revenue.

Brilliant!
 
2012-05-28 04:11:02 AM
That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

/Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay of the new West?
 
2012-05-28 04:15:47 AM
You know. Morons.
 
2012-05-28 04:46:14 AM
Let's see, where would one find the richest and most influential anti-tax, anti-regulation, and anti-government folks? Wichita, maybe?
 
2012-05-28 07:23:02 AM
Let's find the stupidest people in the world and wonder why they're so poor and live in a flat dirty shiathole filled with nothing but corn and idiots for miles and miles in every direction.
 
2012-05-28 07:41:18 AM
Confabulat: Let's find the stupidest people in the world and wonder why they're so poor and live in a flat dirty shiathole filled with nothing but corn and idiots for miles and miles in every direction.

My grandmother grew up there during the 40's and her parents were german immigrants,1934 actually. But anyways she was one of the most racist people I've known and I've had a bipolar guy do a full on nazi salute in my living room. The weirdest thing? She was a holocaust denier which caused quite a bit of issues with a great,great uncle of mine. He liberated one of the camps and when I was a kid I never understood why his wife would be in the kitchen sitting at the table just chatting up a storm with my grandma and he'd be sitting in the living room looking kinda pissed. All that went away when I learned the other bits of info as an adult.

/Boring,weird story sis
//Kansas sounds like shiathole even compared to southeast Ky.
 
2012-05-28 08:12:35 AM
Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls.

This is a farking joke, right? Please?
 
2012-05-28 08:17:38 AM
Gwendolyn: Jesus Christ. Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls. But they'll cut education spending to make up the $4.5 BILLION loss in revenue.

Brilliant!


The serfs should form their own corporations and be independent contractors for their former employers that way they get to pay no taxes as well.
 
2012-05-28 09:09:52 AM
"Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income."

Unfarkingbelievable.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present your GOP!
 
2012-05-28 09:29:50 AM
Yes, but the Job Creators will bring 10,000,000 new jobs to Kansas! Just wait!
 
2012-05-28 09:35:54 AM
I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.
 
2012-05-28 09:37:37 AM
I mean, seriously, think of one moral standing of the Republican Party.

Then think of anything good and decent you learned from Mr. Rogers.

See if you can find anything in common, at all.
 
2012-05-28 09:53:29 AM
GAT_00: Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls.

This is a farking joke, right? Please?


Is it April 1st again? Did we modify the rules to Memorial Day to include April 1st pranks? That doesn't seem like a smart thing to do.
 
2012-05-28 09:53:57 AM
So when every doctor, lawyer, etc. moves to Kansas to open a firm and finds that there are no clients that can afford their services nor educated workers to staff their offices -- what happens?

Sure, it will be a golden age for cable advertisers who will have a metric asston of "Have you been run over by a combine? Call 1-800-CORN-LAW!" commercials to sell...for a while.
 
2012-05-28 09:57:42 AM
Wow. Arizona and Florida may get all the press, but once in a while Kansas will come out of nowhere and completely blow you away with something so massively retarded it can actually change the frame of reference.
 
2012-05-28 09:59:41 AM
Slaxl: That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

The only motivation of a Kansan is to spite Missouri. With this, they'll be able to pull more KC metro businesses into Johnson County so that they can wag their dicks at us while their pockets are picked.

/Slight exaggeration
/Slight
 
2012-05-28 10:05:33 AM
Kansas in 20 years:



My apologies to the non-geeks that don't get it.
 
2012-05-28 10:07:00 AM
Let's try that again:

media.teamxbox.com
 
2012-05-28 10:11:25 AM
Lando Lincoln: Kansas in 20 years:



My apologies to the non-geeks that don't get it.


It took me a minute before I saw you had the next post down as well, so i was desperately trying to see the meaning in the blank area. I felt I came up with some good theories anyway.
 
2012-05-28 10:28:36 AM
The only advantage here is that this is about as close to a GOP wonderland as we'll see unless a state secededs. In 2 or 3 years we can point to a dystopian Kansas and show what GOP policies really lead to.
 
2012-05-28 10:33:09 AM
Under-educating the populace has finally paid off for the GOP... Mazel tov!

While the doctors pay no taxes, I hope the nurses and technicians flee the state in droves.
 
2012-05-28 10:36:29 AM
adamgreeney: In 2 or 3 years we can point to a dystopian Kansas and show what GOP policies really lead to.

They'll just say it's all liberals fault.
 
2012-05-28 10:39:25 AM
GAT_00: adamgreeney: In 2 or 3 years we can point to a dystopian Kansas and show what GOP policies really lead to.

They'll just say it's all liberals fault.


The stalwart and duped? Sure. Those that benefit? Sure. But the emperical evidence will probably be enough to sway those with even basic reasoning.

But the tried and true Republicans? They'll blame the fed.
 
2012-05-28 10:54:54 AM
Support Kansas Government! Order Fries with that!

Here's a helpful pic of what a Kansas Taxpayer might look like

www.macmeisters.com
 
2012-05-28 11:03:24 AM
HakunaMatata: Under-educating the populace has finally paid off for the GOP... Mazel tov!

While the doctors pay no taxes, I hope the nurses and technicians flee the state in droves.


Some doctors will be paying taxes until they figure it out. Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships But the hospilists, ER doctors, the specialists who can't form partnerships and the research doctors working for the University Hospitals will be taxed. That will impact care in my opinion.
 
2012-05-28 11:17:29 AM
Way to go, Kansas.

i595.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-28 11:21:50 AM
I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.
 
2012-05-28 11:24:39 AM
spongeboob: the specialists who can't form partnerships and the research doctors working for the University Hospitals will be taxed

Research doctors will leave for elsewhere. The specialists will figure out how to form appropriate partnerships to compensate-everybody's gonna need a proctologist in KS anyway when this comes to fruition.
 
2012-05-28 11:27:26 AM
Somacandra: I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.

You would be surprised what they'll accept. The interstates are already toll roads and they've been giving unsustainable tax breaks to businesses for years in order to get them to come to Kansas. They're pretty proud of their schools in Johnson County though, so who knows what will happen if the quality starts to drop off.
 
2012-05-28 11:27:51 AM
GAT_00: Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls.

This is a farking joke, right? Please?


Nope. It's what happens when you have Republicans in charge and a batsh*t insane Governor who used to live in a building designated as a church in DC when he was a Senator, and washed a staffer's feet, because Jesus did that for his disciples.
 
2012-05-28 11:31:00 AM
Walker: Nope. It's what happens when you have Republicans in charge and a batsh*t insane Governor who used to live in a building designated as a church in DC when he was a Senator, and washed a staffer's feet, because Jesus did that for his disciples.

And do you know what the best part is? They actually had to pull back on their original tax plan because of resistance from other Republicans in the legislature who were concerned about the potential revenue drop. That's right, this is the compromise plan.
 
2012-05-28 11:39:47 AM
Mentat: Walker: Nope. It's what happens when you have Republicans in charge and a batsh*t insane Governor who used to live in a building designated as a church in DC when he was a Senator, and washed a staffer's feet, because Jesus did that for his disciples.

And do you know what the best part is? They actually had to pull back on their original tax plan because of resistance from other Republicans in the legislature who were concerned about the potential revenue drop. That's right, this is the compromise plan.


This doesn't make sense, if they are concerned about any revenue drop it shows they're not complete imbeciles and it shows they're not deliberately trying to bankrupt the state, so why do this ludicrous measure which is still slightly imbecilic and will bankrupt the state?

Trying to understand the GOP is very difficult.
 
2012-05-28 11:43:32 AM
Let's not be so hasty, folks. Now the job creators will flock to Kansas!
 
2012-05-28 11:46:58 AM
Kansas is just the lab rat for what the GOP wants to implement for the entire country.
 
2012-05-28 11:47:06 AM
It's just a swirling mass of bloodied feathers now
 
2012-05-28 11:47:39 AM
NewportBarGuy: Yes, but the Job Creators will bring 10,000,000 new jobs to Kansas! Just wait!

This IS what Republicans actually believe, along with:

gimmegimme: Let's not be so hasty, folks. Now the job creators will flock to Kansas!
 
2012-05-28 11:48:46 AM
Brownback just signed a law banning Sharia too...you know, because the 3 Muslims living in Kansas might meet up at a Chi-Fil-A and get ideas.
 
2012-05-28 11:48:56 AM
And this is what the GOP wants for the nation.
 
2012-05-28 11:49:20 AM
What the actual fark?
 
2012-05-28 11:49:31 AM
Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

exportingblue.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-05-28 11:49:46 AM
Oh, this will be a wonderful experiment! Let's see how it turns out!

/note to self: underline, bold, and add a few more exclamation marks to your previous 'Stay away from Kansas!!!' note
 
2012-05-28 11:50:46 AM
fark Brownback and his Koch sucking ways.
 
2012-05-28 11:51:19 AM
not this again.

signed on Tuesday.

old news is SO exciting.
 
2012-05-28 11:51:23 AM
Well, let's think about this:

Poor people are too damn poor to pull up stakes and move elsewhere, so they'll take it in the ass just like the Kansas GOP wants them to.

Rich doctors will seriously consider moving to Kansas.

Nurses and other medical staff will say, "fark this shiat - I can get a job anywhere in the country" and move away.
 
2012-05-28 11:52:29 AM
Just now I was thinking how sad it would be if Obama lost to Mitt.

Then I see this article, showing the kind of people who would vote him out.

:-(
 
2012-05-28 11:52:37 AM
Zalan: Gwendolyn: Jesus Christ. Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls. But they'll cut education spending to make up the $4.5 BILLION loss in revenue.

Brilliant!

The serfs should form their own corporations and be independent contractors for their former employers that way they get to pay no taxes as well.


Unions (what you are describing, essentially) will soon be illegal. See Wisconsin.
 
2012-05-28 11:53:03 AM
Slaxl: This doesn't make sense, if they are concerned about any revenue drop it shows they're not complete imbeciles and it shows they're not deliberately trying to bankrupt the state, so why do this ludicrous measure which is still slightly imbecilic and will bankrupt the state?

Trying to understand the GOP is very difficult.


ideology is a helluva drug.
 
2012-05-28 11:54:05 AM
You know that a bill full of tax cuts is a bad idea when you can't convince every Republican in the legislature to support that bill.

/I hate my state so very much
 
2012-05-28 11:54:18 AM
And how much federal revenue will be poured into Kansas to compensate for the loss of services from this idiocy?
 
2012-05-28 11:54:22 AM
Taxes are the price you pay for a civilized society.
 
2012-05-28 11:55:15 AM
gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]


chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?
 
2012-05-28 11:55:48 AM
I've been listening to lectures on feudal europe, so I'm getting a....

no, it's still sad.
 
2012-05-28 11:56:04 AM
Good. Maybe they can be an object lesson to the rest of us.
 
2012-05-28 11:56:38 AM
Somacandra: spongeboob: the specialists who can't form partnerships and the research doctors working for the University Hospitals will be taxed

Research doctors will leave for elsewhere. The specialists will figure out how to form appropriate partnerships to compensate-everybody's gonna need a proctologist in KS anyway when this comes to fruition.



But when the people of Kansas go the Hospital they are going to have one of two things happen.

The ER doctors and the house doctors are going to be doctors who are willing to work for someone else and therefor pay taxes. So doctors who are not able to find other work(examples history of malpractice or substance abuse) older doctors who are part timers and not up on the latest medical knowledge or Foreign trained doctors(and then the patients will complain they can't understand those Foreign doctors).
Or number two they will receive separate bills from every Physician who treats them in the hospital, and then complain about that.

Kansas will probably be over run with Doctors who went into medicine in order to make money more than to help people or because they enjoy science. My problem with that is anyone who goes into medicine to be rich is deluded or idiotic. Seriously if you want to be rich go into business, eight years of school, 3-9 years of residency and a mountain of debt is not the path to riches, comfort maybe but not riches.
 
2012-05-28 11:56:39 AM
gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]


They already have a talking point chambered for this one too (Notice Alaska at #3 despike being "mavericky"). Something about the Federal Government imposing all sorts of horrible regulations that prevent the recovery of natural resources and economic independence.

Don't try and shame the true patriot with charts. It only increases their desire to have coal slag in their drinking water and Jesus on the $1 bill.
 
2012-05-28 11:56:50 AM
Everyone who is smart enough, will incorporate and become a consultant for your old job


They could have eliminated the state income tax for everyone, like Nevada, but out of spite they laid it on the backs of the working man


So untaxed income goes all the way terugh the corporation until it gets to the file clerk and then he pays all the taxes

Oh and your property taxes are going to rise, you know, if there is another tornado, since you live in Tornado alley and all.
 
2012-05-28 11:57:12 AM
I came to the thread to see how the local conservatives were justifying this, but apparently they're not even bothering. That says a lot.

/except tenpoundsofcheese, who isn't even addressing the issue.
 
2012-05-28 11:57:44 AM
This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.
 
2012-05-28 11:57:49 AM
I can't wait until the red states devolve into true third-world cesspools of poverty. That way I can go slumming on the weekends without having to go all the way to Mexico.
 
2012-05-28 11:58:23 AM
Confabulat: I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.

Funny that you say that. I was on http://www.petridish.org/ the other day (basically Kickstarter for science projects) and there's a study requesting funding to examine gopher tortoise burrows.
 
2012-05-28 11:58:27 AM
"Inevitably, there will be major reductions in the government services Kansans have come to expect - especially education."


I call BS. Since when did Kansas start spending money on education?
 
2012-05-28 11:58:46 AM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?


you are being del

iberately obtuse it

does not suit you well
 
2012-05-28 11:59:00 AM
Lando Lincoln: Well, let's think about this:

Poor people are too damn poor to pull up stakes and move elsewhere, so they'll take it in the ass just like the Kansas GOP wants them to.

Rich doctors will seriously consider moving to Kansas.

Nurses and other medical staff will say, "fark this shiat - I can get a job anywhere in the country" and move away.


And everybody else will go ahead and just put Kansas on the list where moving is simply not an option, drying up any attempts for 'job creators!' to bring in more people to provide a wider tax base. And those who will suffer the most from this will just get more angry and vote Republican because they'll be too stupid to actually know how they farked themselves.

At this point the GOP is just going state-by-state to create new third worlds. I imagine Kansas will be proud to have a job, even if it's $5 an hour.
 
2012-05-28 11:59:25 AM
www.nd.edu

"...Then dig their eyes out with a spoon."
 
2012-05-28 11:59:28 AM
Fly *over* state. Do NOT drive through. Check.
 
2012-05-28 12:00:27 PM
Krymson Tyde: "Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income."

If Kansas wants to volunteer itself as a petri dish for undiluted Republican genius, why don't the rest of us in the other 49 states put everything on hold for a few years until we can see how this works out for them?
 
2012-05-28 12:01:03 PM
Confabulat

I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.



You're kind of stuck on the ol' gopher tortoise thing, arentcha?

plus....if you want to pay extra I believe the IRS will accept a check from you at any time - think of it as a gift to help the country......oh, unless of course, you are just saying you want to pay more to make some kind of dim point.
 
2012-05-28 12:02:42 PM
Kansas. The heartland NOT the brainland. I have always wanted to visit a third world country, I never thought I would just have to hop across the Canadian border to the US.
 
2012-05-28 12:03:07 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?


Don't be so farking obtuse. You know goddamn well what it means, asshole.
 
Heb
2012-05-28 12:05:38 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: not this again.

signed on Tuesday.

old news is SO exciting.


I didnt see it on Tuesday, which is surprising as this is absolutely batshiat insane.

I mean lawyers paying no tax while their receptionists do? Utterly bonkers.
 
2012-05-28 12:05:45 PM
Of course the irony is that your average Kansas inbred will as things get worse and worse over time simply blame the liberals, socialists, Obama, etc.. etc..

I could give a rat's ass, except that I live in one of those states that pays to support these inbred losers. So yeah, when they vote this crap in why don't they also vote a measure in that would insure they take LESS Federal assistance.
 
2012-05-28 12:06:00 PM
I initially assumed subby was just being dramatic, but after reading the article...Holy shiat.
 
2012-05-28 12:08:17 PM
Republican Paradise.

An exploitable uneducated populace with a tax free ruling class that they are part of.
 
2012-05-28 12:08:19 PM
Confabulat: I mean, seriously, think of one moral standing of the Republican Party.

Then think of anything good and decent you learned from Mr. Rogers.

See if you can find anything in common, at all.


...and yet the "holiest" among them try to argue that atheists have no morals.

I'd rather have no morals than your morals, mate.
 
2012-05-28 12:09:48 PM
Dang.....with this added to the anti-Sharia law Brownback signed this week, Kansas may be nudging up close to Arizona here....
 
2012-05-28 12:09:49 PM
karnal: Confabulat

I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.


You're kind of stuck on the ol' gopher tortoise thing, arentcha?

plus....if you want to pay extra I believe the IRS will accept a check from you at any time - think of it as a gift to help the country......oh, unless of course, you are just saying you want to pay more to make some kind of dim point.


This is the second thread I've noticed you making a particularly idiotic comment towards Confabulat in...

And it vexed me so terribly I came out of lurking to point it out.

You should stop talking and go away, as you contribute nothing. Thanks.
 
2012-05-28 12:10:26 PM
Kansas: If you're not a wealthy Christian, then fark you.
 
2012-05-28 12:11:13 PM
Gwendolyn: Jesus Christ. Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls. But they'll cut education spending to make up the $4.5 BILLION loss in revenue.

Brilliant!




That's one of the fun things about having all these 57 states: its like a laboratory of fail.

Let the insane states practice their craziness and fall flat on their face while states like mine kick back and keep on churning out new inventions and college graduates and jobs galore.

"Kansas government relies on three taxes: property, sales and income. Property and sales taxes are regressive in the sense that a lower-income person pays more of these taxes as a percent of income than does a higher-income person. The new income tax will be dramatically regressive. Low- and moderate-income workers will remain on the tax rolls. Meanwhile, wealthy Kansans will readily escape the tax, and many prosperous (but not wealthy) Kansans will be able to evade the tax as well. Beginning in 2013, the Kansas tax system will be among the most regressive in the nation.


On second thought, it might be a good place to start a business so we can exploit all the poor people of Kansas. There are some business models that will work well under this arrangement. It will be like an extremist's version of Delaware.
 
2012-05-28 12:11:46 PM
Somacandra: I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.

It's not an entirely honest portrayal of the effect of this. Professionals sill have to pay some income tax even if they are in a partnership or S-Corp. The only tax that Kansas removed is on that portion of the income that is attributable to being a business profit. The portion that is attributable to the services that the owner personally performs (wages) is still taxed. While owners do set their own salaries (and thus could make them artificially low to avoid taxation), there are objective standards that the IRS uses to determine whether or not the salary is a reasonable one. If they feel it is not, they will adjust the owners figures accordingly.
 
2012-05-28 12:12:37 PM
On one hand I'm like

GOOD! Let their idiot constituents suffer for the government they voted in.

But what will really happen is that the people hurt by these taxes will protest the Federal government raising taxes which will get put out there by the Lamestream MSM media as "DEMOCRATS BAD"!!!

Is this the new red state things? Tax the crap out of people at the state level (so much so that it negatively affects a huge number of voters on both sides of the aisle) so that they'll come together and protest the Federal government? Sure seems like it.
 
2012-05-28 12:13:44 PM
fta Equally important, the act dramatically changes the Kansas tax system, shifting the income tax burden from the wealthy and prosperous to working people.

img.photobucket.com

I'll still be able to fly to New York and Chicago without having to land in Kansas, though, right? Fine. Carry on, morans.
 
2012-05-28 12:14:19 PM
And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.
 
2012-05-28 12:14:26 PM
In other words, property taxes in Kansas will make living in New York look cheap, drivers licenses $300, $2000 to register a new car, $100/year wheel taxes, $400 speeding tickets, giant student fee and tuition increases at KU and K State, and fees to use the library.

It's pretty f*cking ridiculous these asshats don't realize that cutting government services' budgets doesn't make the demand for those services go away.
 
2012-05-28 12:14:45 PM
Wow, my state Oklahoma isn't even this stupid, the proposed massive tax cut here didn't pass. Thank FSM.
 
2012-05-28 12:15:18 PM
Kanemano: but out of spite they laid it on the backs of the working man

are the tax rates going up for the working man or are they just paying what they paid before?
 
2012-05-28 12:15:20 PM
One of the issues the leading up to Civil War was whether Kansas should be a free state or a slave state.

The Union victory decided this as "free".

The Kansas legislature has now reversed this and thinks the lower economic classes should be enslaved to support the rich. Well at least this time slavery is not defined along purely racial lines.
 
2012-05-28 12:16:51 PM
Confabulat: Let's find the stupidest people in the world and wonder why they're so poor and live in a flat dirty shiathole filled with nothing but corn and idiots for miles and miles in every direction.

That would be Nebraska.

We've got nothing but wheat and idiots for miles and miles in every direction once you get past Lawrence.
 
2012-05-28 12:17:05 PM
They also just redistricted the state to move the only blue coutnty in northeast Kansas to western Kansas... Stay classy GOP!
 
2012-05-28 12:17:10 PM
FTFA: the act dramatically changes the Kansas tax system, shifting the income tax burden from the wealthy and prosperous to working people....
Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income.


I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.
 
2012-05-28 12:17:15 PM
All right, sis, time to move out of Kansas. Bring your husband and kids.
 
2012-05-28 12:18:21 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Kanemano: but out of spite they laid it on the backs of the working man

are the tax rates going up for the working man or are they just paying what they paid before?


gapyx.com

Fear not, citizens. Your taxes will remain the same! And there will be beautiful lyre music as your state burns!
 
2012-05-28 12:19:35 PM
Lando Lincoln: Let's try that again:

[media.teamxbox.com image 640x440]


That can. Pick it up
 
2012-05-28 12:19:44 PM
casual disregard: This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.

Kansas Dateline 2017:

i48.tinypic.com
 
2012-05-28 12:20:20 PM
Not farked, just evil. There are several states with no income taxes at all. They get revenue from other taxes. So even if this law eliminates income taxes for their professional workers the state will still get income and won't collapse. It just punishes people for not being one of those workers and those are just the kind of people who don't have the mobility to quit their job and leave for another state.

Punishing poor people for being poor is undeniably evil but the state won't die because of it.
 
2012-05-28 12:21:21 PM
This is going to create so many jobs. Just wait.
 
2012-05-28 12:21:56 PM
HairBolus: The Kansas legislature has now reversed this and thinks the lower economic classes should be enslaved to support the rich. Well at least this time slavery is not defined along purely racial lines.

poor, non-land owning ...
while it isnt pure racial, it certainly is class warfare
 
2012-05-28 12:22:00 PM
Lost Thought 00: And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.

Not to mention that the now unmaintained roads will be largely washed away, so the few employees they have won't be able to get to work consistently. Oh, and now that the police force has been downsized, they're going to have to hire private security to protect them from the very desperate, angry, and armed gangs of young men walking the streets.
 
2012-05-28 12:22:06 PM
The people of Kansas deserve the government they voted for. F*ck'em.
 
2012-05-28 12:22:07 PM
Lost Thought 00: And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.



Lets see what is likely to happen here in the long term as a result of this jackasserey:


Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes and while services across the state are slashed >> lower quality of life for middle class and poor >> middle class and poor leave the state in droves >> professional services need to increase wages to attract janitors, teachers, garbage men and auto repair dudes >> costs for professional services increase as a result >> middle class quality of life still sucks because there are still no tax dollars to pay for public services AND because they cannot afford professional services due to increased costs >> middle class and poor continue to leave the state, leaving it a Ayn Randian Going Gault paradise where the rich have no one to hire so they are out mowing their own lawns, performing surgery on themselves, fixing their own cars, and cleaning their own houses.
 
2012-05-28 12:22:28 PM
Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.
 
2012-05-28 12:23:08 PM
This plan is two-fold: KS has a balanced budget amendment, so the revenue shortfalls must be compensated for by slashing services. The stage is already being set by the local knee-jerks for assigning blame when (not if, but when) this plan explodes into a spectacular failure: the sunsetting of the Bush-era tax cuts. Brownback came out and publically announced that something like 20K jobs will be created by 2018 as a direct result of this tax policy, but blame is already being assigned to the Obama administration for when these jobs don't come to fruition. Counties are going to have to bump their ad valorem property and sales taxes to compensate for the shortfalls, but even these measures won't come close to addressing the tangled knot that this clusterfark is going to create.

I say, firebomb this state. Let the GOP have their way with it in every way they possibly want: abortion, regulation, tax policy, gutting state services. Let this state become the petri dish for the rest of the nation to examine and say "well, it was a good run conservatives, but now we'll let the adults handle things."
 
2012-05-28 12:23:15 PM
NewportBarGuy: casual disregard: This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.

Kansas Dateline 2017:

[i48.tinypic.com image 300x300]


Dude or dudette, you're absolutely right. I was trying to think of a society that exemplifies right-wing ideology and you hit the nail on the head. I will be using this from now on.

Who needs police when you have your own peacemaker?

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-05-28 12:23:48 PM
I'm all for this. It's not my state.
 
2012-05-28 12:24:33 PM
Slaxl: That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

/Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay of the new West?


There is no place in north america where farmers form a majority of the electorate. I'll thank you to stop slandering us.
 
2012-05-28 12:25:04 PM
Lost Thought 00: And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.

www.angryflower.com
 
2012-05-28 12:25:09 PM
Sometimes, folks get pissed. Sometimes, folks get real pissed. I am hoping this is the latter scenario, cause this is something to be real pissed about. Services will be decimated, in particular education which is essential to social mobility.
 
2012-05-28 12:25:50 PM
Cataholic: Somacandra: I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.

It's not an entirely honest portrayal of the effect of this. Professionals sill have to pay some income tax even if they are in a partnership or S-Corp. The only tax that Kansas removed is on that portion of the income that is attributable to being a business profit. The portion that is attributable to the services that the owner personally performs (wages) is still taxed. While owners do set their own salaries (and thus could make them artificially low to avoid taxation), there are objective standards that the IRS uses to determine whether or not the salary is a reasonable one. If they feel it is not, they will adjust the owners figures accordingly.


The audit rate is about 1%. 5% on the highest tax brackets.

Wanna know who taught me that?

The author of this bill.

I'll have to ask him why he wrote it.
 
2012-05-28 12:25:55 PM
Rapmaster2000: I'm all for this. It's not my state.

Reap what you vote for IMO.
 
2012-05-28 12:26:04 PM
Fart_Machine: Kansas is just the lab rat for what the GOP wants to implement for the entire country.

You are correct. And if Kansans want to do that to themselves, fine. The problem is that Kansas is already a welfare State, and as their new tax system drags them further into poverty, more of my tax dollars are going to be shifted to Kansas to prop them up and keep the State from collapsing. If Kansas wants to secede and fail w/o waisting my money first, fine. Otherwise, I reserve the right to mock and ridicule a State full of people intentionally taking my money without the ability or even the intent of repaying me. Fark you, Kansas.

img.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-28 12:26:24 PM
Finally, a Fair Tax which rewards initiative, and punishes sloth. Don't want to pay an income tax? Become a Job Creator.
 
2012-05-28 12:26:47 PM
Zalan: The serfs should form their own corporations and be independent contractors for their former employers that way they get to pay no taxes as well.

It costs about 200 bucks to form a corp. I think you're onto something here.
 
2012-05-28 12:26:47 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?


It says, right at the top of the chart that states were designated red or blue by results of the 2004 Presidential election. Of course, you knew that, but you wanted to pretend the chart didn't say anything. Also, 3 of the four red states that give more than they get turned blue in 2008.
 
2012-05-28 12:27:53 PM
Wow so Kansas has gone full derp. Dude you never go full derp. First the anti-abortion bill, then the Sharia law bill and now this one. Shiat Kansas is so bad now Dorthy is looking for a tornado back to Oz.
 
2012-05-28 12:27:55 PM
Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.
 
2012-05-28 12:27:58 PM
crab66: Republican Paradise.

An exploitable uneducated populace with a tax free ruling class that they are part of.




This

anybody who denies this is the long term plan of the GOP and it's 100-200 Billionaire funders is either a moron or diluted enough to think they'll be a billionaire someday too.
 
2012-05-28 12:27:58 PM
Mr. Coffee Nerves: So when every doctor, lawyer, etc. moves to Kansas to open a firm and finds that there are no clients that can afford their services nor educated workers to staff their offices -- what happens?

Sure, it will be a golden age for cable advertisers who will have a metric asston of "Have you been run over by a combine? Call 1-800-CORN-LAW!" commercials to sell...for a while.


I read that in the voice of Cave Johnson
 
2012-05-28 12:28:16 PM
A thank you gift for the poor and middle class in Kansas:
3.bp.blogspot.com

Eat up.
 
2012-05-28 12:28:43 PM
go to page 20

This report was from january 2012.
I can not wait to see the new revised budget.
 
2012-05-28 12:29:02 PM
Vangor: Sometimes, folks get pissed. Sometimes, folks get real pissed. I am hoping this is the latter scenario, cause this is something to be real pissed about. Services will be decimated, in particular education which is essential to social mobility.

Bingo.

Our lower education system has been pretty damned good for decades. Depresses the hell out of me to see people turn on it.

The GOP is just farking their own grandkids in the name of sticking it to the liberals.
 
2012-05-28 12:29:55 PM
Don't Troll Me Bro!: tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?

It says, right at the top of the chart that states were designated red or blue by results of the 2004 Presidential election. Of course, you knew that, but you wanted to pretend the chart didn't say anything. Also, 3 of the four red states that give more than they get turned blue in 2008.


It is a meaningless, political, label.

There is a difference between a state that voted 75% for one party vs. a state that voted 50.1% for one party. But in this chart they would be the same.
 
2012-05-28 12:30:33 PM
Income of professionals

define professionals. If a fast food clerk forms an LLC do they pay taxes?

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

That's easy!
A state can be considered democrat or republican based on the ruling party elected to their state government.
My turn
How can a corporation have religion? How can Obamacare violate freedom of religion when corporations can't, in and of themselves, believe anything?
 
2012-05-28 12:31:15 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.


While you're looking at the information, did the people who voted for this bill offer to take a pay cut?
 
2012-05-28 12:31:36 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?


Did you even read the words on the chart. It explains it right there.
 
2012-05-28 12:32:05 PM
gimmegimme: I was trying to think of a society that exemplifies right-wing ideology

No, you're confused. Right-wing economic ideology envisions happy white 4-member families of heterosexuals with a main home, a vacation home, 4 vehicles, a boat and everyone smiling as the new reports on the progress of the war against the brown people.

The alternate 1985 Hill Valley vision is simply the reality of the economic actions of Darwinian Capitalism. Some win, everyone else loses.

So, you're right that it exemplifies something, but it's the reality, not the vision of these f*cking bumpkins.
 
2012-05-28 12:32:27 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: Lost Thought 00: And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.

[www.angryflower.com image 640x337]


I LOVE angry flower. Time to get the books out and read them again.
 
2012-05-28 12:32:43 PM
AcneVulgaris: Zalan: The serfs should form their own corporations and be independent contractors for their former employers that way they get to pay no taxes as well.

It costs about 200 bucks to form a corp. I think you're onto something here.


First thing you need to do is to get your employer to agree to this.
Then you need to figure out where you are going to get health insurance from.
 
2012-05-28 12:32:52 PM
gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]


Is there any update for this? I see the data is from 2005.
 
2012-05-28 12:33:20 PM
Kansas just volunteered itself into serfdom. I'm sure the justification is "cuz unions and libs...".
 
2012-05-28 12:33:36 PM
Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?
 
2012-05-28 12:33:54 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: It is a meaningless, political, label.

There is a difference between a state that voted 75% for one party vs. a state that voted 50.1% for one party. But in this chart they would be the same.


Will someone PLEASE save this the next time tenpoundsofcheese goes off on one of his rants about Democrats?
 
2012-05-28 12:34:04 PM
O...kayyy.

i.imgur.com
 
2012-05-28 12:34:25 PM
Confabulat: I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.

To be fair, Republicans want YOU to pay higher taxes so they don't have to. Well, at least the Republicans who make over $250K per year shouldn't have to pay taxes. The poor Republicans should pay a higher rate. And people who work minimum wage jobs should definitely pay more taxes. And, the minimum wage should be lower, if not eliminated entirely.

Of course, the poor people are not going to be able to afford stuff like food, clothing, or education. But thngs will still work out. They can sign their lives over to some rich person or corporation. They can sign their children over, too. Instead of working for money, they will work for shelter, food, and what ever niceties their - well, lets call them "masters" - masters choose to give. Now, these lucky folks will not have to pay a dime in taxes because they will not have any money. The really nice thing is that they won't have to worry about finding someone to love because their masters will decide who belongs together based on who will create the best workers. (This is also why the ghey is so bad. No new workers.) And these happy couples will not have to worry about too many children, because the masters will be able to trade children for better workers.

So, see? Everything is going to work out.
 
2012-05-28 12:35:14 PM
Riothamus: The GOP is just farking their own grandkids in the name of sticking it to the liberals.

nah
their grandkids live in rich townships, which will always have good public schools. (or private schools)
those poor city kids will get screwed. again.
 
2012-05-28 12:35:35 PM
MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

tenpoundsofcheese didn't notice, either. I'm guessing he's now an idiotic liberal?
 
2012-05-28 12:35:44 PM
I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.
 
2012-05-28 12:36:06 PM
LeoffDaGrate: tenpoundsofcheese: It is a meaningless, political, label.

There is a difference between a state that voted 75% for one party vs. a state that voted 50.1% for one party. But in this chart they would be the same.

Will someone PLEASE save this the next time tenpoundsofcheese goes off on one of his rants about Democrats?


are you unable to save this? you can use cut and paste.

I have no idea what you are talking about but since you seem unable to save a simple post, I don't think what you say is relevant.
 
2012-05-28 12:36:21 PM
Quagdingo: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

Is there any update for this? I see the data is from 2005.


No problem. Here's what Kansas will look like in 2013:

images2.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2012-05-28 12:36:32 PM
They can absorb the education cuts. I mean they only need one textbook at this point don't they.
encrypted-tbn1.google.com

/If it ain't in the bible, then it ain't real to me.
 
2012-05-28 12:37:15 PM
gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.

While you're looking at the information, did the people who voted for this bill offer to take a pay cut?


I don't know.
Did 0bama offer to take a pay cut after passing his tax cuts last year?
 
2012-05-28 12:37:45 PM
Somebody* just got Trolled specials-images.forbes.com

*in this case, another state. I don't know how much of America is aware of how many states this (the trolling) has happened to since 2010. I know New Hampshire has, with the Legislature going almost completely goofball crazy. Maine has, Wisconsin has, Arizona certiainly has, Florida,now Kansas, which comes as little surprise.
Are there any other states that have had this level of Durp driven policy making or at least an attempt at it.
 
2012-05-28 12:38:07 PM
A Terrible Human: //Kansas sounds like shiathole even compared to southeast Ky.

Kansas is hovering around 3rd world nation status. Driving through Wichita is like driving through some sort of Fallout 3 theme park.
 
2012-05-28 12:38:39 PM
:: reads headline ::

Oh c'mon it can't be that bad..

:: clicks link, reads article ::

I.....I....there....there are no words....
 
2012-05-28 12:39:23 PM
LeoffDaGrate: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

tenpoundsofcheese didn't notice, either. I'm guessing he's now an idiotic liberal?


wut? you want me to state the obvious?
 
2012-05-28 12:39:52 PM
Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income.

In other news, ships seen leaving a sinking rat.
 
2012-05-28 12:40:23 PM
DrD'isInfotainment: Are there any other states that have had this level of Durp driven policy making or at least an attempt at it.

Ohio's bought-and-paid-for legislature tried to strip rights from workers, but the people managed to overturn it at the polls. This country is so far gone I don't think it's possible for it to find its way back. Corporate feudalism is inevitable at this point.
 
2012-05-28 12:40:59 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.

While you're looking at the information, did the people who voted for this bill offer to take a pay cut?

I don't know.
Did 0bama offer to take a pay cut after passing his tax cuts last year?


Well, President Obama is not trying to cripple the economy and decimate the middle and lower classes in favor of the Republican Party.
 
2012-05-28 12:41:48 PM
silly troll: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.




Historically, taxes are later increased after politicians wake up and realize that running a state/country costs money.

Case in point:

capitolcommentary.com

lrn2history

The tragic thing is that GHW Bush doing this was proof positive that he was more responsible and looking out for the long term good of America more than his idiot son ever would. The fact that he was (at least a slightly) responsible person destroyed him politically. And his base has only gotten more insane since then.

Its going to be fun watching Kansas break down and fall apart further over the next several years. It is horrifying knowing that a reactionary neanderthal like Sam Brownshirt Brownback was ever given authority over an entire state. Hearing stories just as funny as hearing how Georgia had millions of dollars in crops rotting away in its fields because there was no one left to pick the fruit, driven out of the state via its new Papers Please laws, but coming from Kansas now. Good entertainment value for the rest of us.
 
2012-05-28 12:43:51 PM
amishkarl: Slaxl: That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

/Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay of the new West?

There is no place in north america where farmers form a majority of the electorate. I'll thank you to stop slandering us.


Sorry, nothing will stop me making Blazing Saddles references.
 
2012-05-28 12:44:24 PM
gimmegimme: Fear not, citizens. Your taxes will remain the same! And there will be beautiful lyre music as your state burns!

We tried that once. It didn't take.
 
2012-05-28 12:44:25 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.


What schools do poor people go to?

How are those schools funded?
 
2012-05-28 12:47:11 PM
Goodfella: silly troll: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.



Historically, taxes are later increased after politicians wake up and realize that running a state/country costs money.

Case in point:

[capitolcommentary.com image 450x340]

lrn2history

The tragic thing is that GHW Bush doing this was proof positive that he was more responsible and looking out for the long term good of America more than his idiot son ever would. The fact that he was (at least a slightly) responsible person destroyed him politically. And his base has only gotten more insane since then.

Its going to be fun watching Kansas break down and fall apart further over the next several years. It is horrifying knowing that a reactionary neanderthal like Sam Brownshirt Brownback was ever given authority over an entire state. Hearing stories just as funny as hearing how Georgia had millions of dollars in crops rotting away in its fields because there was no one left to pick the fruit, driven out of the state via its new Papers Please laws, but coming from Kansas now. Good entertainment value for the rest of us.


I keep seeing this, "haw haw, look at them derpers," but look at your example. Georgia has crops rotting away in the fields due to their stupid immigration laws. That's food that isn't being sold and is going to waste. That means less food going to market and prices are going higher. That's an indirect effect of Georgia's stupidity affecting everybody else. That's why we shouldn't just be laughing at Kansas. We should be pissed. Their stupidity is going to appeal to other state legislatures and the economic effects of Kansas' idiocy will appear in other ways.
 
2012-05-28 12:49:31 PM
largedon: They can absorb the education cuts. I mean they only need one textbook at this point don't they.
[encrypted-tbn1.google.com image 179x147]

/If it ain't in the bible, then it ain't real to me.




i.imgur.com
 
2012-05-28 12:49:57 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: LeoffDaGrate: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

tenpoundsofcheese didn't notice, either. I'm guessing he's now an idiotic liberal?

wut? you want me to state the obvious?


Do we ever?
 
2012-05-28 12:51:12 PM
DrD'isInfotainment: *in this case, another state. I don't know how much of America is aware of how many states this (the trolling) has happened to since 2010. I know New Hampshire has, with the Legislature going almost completely goofball crazy. Maine has, Wisconsin has, Arizona certiainly has, Florida,now Kansas, which comes as little surprise.
Are there any other states that have had this level of Durp driven policy making or at least an attempt at it.


Missouri is trying, but the Republican Party has fractured to the point where their supermajorities in the legislature are meaningless.
 
2012-05-28 12:51:57 PM
LouDobbsAwaaaay: This country is so far gone I don't think it's possible for it to find its way back. Corporate feudalism is inevitable at this point.

That's exactly what I'm fearing, and I'm just hoping that I'm able to get out before it gets too bad. Seriously, between the GOP taking over state after state and pulling this kind of crap, and my now total lack of any patriotic feeling, I am halfway expecting to leave and perhaps renounce my citizenship sometime after I get my next degree. My girlfriend got hers from Cambridge -maybe once we get married we can leverage that into some sort of refugee status in the UK.
 
2012-05-28 12:53:04 PM
Kansas is already a welfare state, receiving $1.10 in federal spending for every $1.00 they put in. They will now put in less and take back more. Kansas is duping the other states.
 
2012-05-28 12:53:41 PM
Mentat: DrD'isInfotainment: *in this case, another state. I don't know how much of America is aware of how many states this (the trolling) has happened to since 2010. I know New Hampshire has, with the Legislature going almost completely goofball crazy. Maine has, Wisconsin has, Arizona certiainly has, Florida,now Kansas, which comes as little surprise.
Are there any other states that have had this level of Durp driven policy making or at least an attempt at it.

Missouri is trying, but the Republican Party has fractured to the point where their supermajorities in the legislature are meaningless.


That's actually a sign of hope for Missouri. If the GOP is too busy derping among itself it's too busy to run the state into the ground.
 
2012-05-28 12:56:28 PM
LarryDan43: Kansas is already a welfare state, receiving $1.10 in federal spending for every $1.00 they put in. They will now put in less and take back more. Kansas is duping the other states.

All this right wing crap in the states will go a lot farther to grow federal government, which is the very thing the right is always b*tching about. If the rest of the US has to constantly prop up low tax red states, then we are all going to have more of a say in how they run their business. Starting with their lousy education standards that "teach the controversy."
 
2012-05-28 12:56:49 PM
www.vahistorical.org
Would gladly knock some sense into Kansas again...
 
2012-05-28 12:58:53 PM
Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income.

Remember lower class folks, you asked for this. All the red states will point to this and follow suit shortly.

All we need now is a caste system.
 
2012-05-28 01:01:54 PM
Kansas is trending toward Online K-12 "education". The Theory is that "Home Schooled" kids can get their GED while their parents work 60-80 hours a week.

These are the same geniuses that gave Boeing 1 BILLION to keep their factories in the state and got nothing in writing. Then Boeing left three months later...

Kansas is a great place to live. If you're a prison guard.
 
2012-05-28 01:05:18 PM
Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls.

Kansas voters must really have drank the Kool-Aid if they think this is a good idea.
 
2012-05-28 01:07:09 PM
Yea, perfect. The people most in a position to help an economy (the spending middle class) will either flee or sit on their money. The poor and rich will once again continue their own odd status quo. Look how well farking the middle class is working for California's economy.
 
2012-05-28 01:07:53 PM
Reduce gov't revenues and cut taxes. Awesome. Plus I know a girl there. Just might move to Kansas.
 
2012-05-28 01:08:36 PM
Yes I am from Kansas

No I don't vote for these idiots

Yes this will keep the population stupid so that they keep voting for Republicans

Yes Brownback needs to rot in hell

It will be interesting watching the train wreck. Although my increased tax burden will be a bummer...
 
2012-05-28 01:09:11 PM
Slaxl: amishkarl: Slaxl: That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

/Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay of the new West?

There is no place in north america where farmers form a majority of the electorate. I'll thank you to stop slandering us.

Sorry, nothing will stop me making Blazing Saddles references.


It's twue... it's twue!
 
2012-05-28 01:09:15 PM
MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

Which state without income tax are you talking about?
 
2012-05-28 01:11:36 PM
Mods are being shiat stains. I see a particular troll (who apparently I am not allowed to name without a form of repercussion I also am not allowed to name) has a very elite, protected status.
 
2012-05-28 01:11:43 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: AcneVulgaris: Zalan: The serfs should form their own corporations and be independent contractors for their former employers that way they get to pay no taxes as well.

It costs about 200 bucks to form a corp. I think you're onto something here.

First thing you need to do is to get your employer to agree to this.
Then you need to figure out where you are going to get health insurance from.


An insurance company?

/is incorporated
//has health insurance
 
2012-05-28 01:14:24 PM
First thing to watch: Kansas City KS/MO arbitrage.
 
2012-05-28 01:14:52 PM
Glad this is getting some attention. This is literally the stupidest tax policy I have ever seen. Pants-on-head retarded. I don't even know what to say.

It is a bit reminiscent of feudal economics. The lower your status, the more taxes you pay. Of course, we all know how well that worked out.
 
2012-05-28 01:15:54 PM
The middle class will disappear from that state so fast your head will spin. Their priorities are education, education, education, and without adequate funding, they will just abandon you.

This is a mind-numbingly bad idea. Way to go, Kansas!
 
2012-05-28 01:16:32 PM
Coming soon to Kansas

www.kalonjibakery.com

photos.osmek.com
 
2012-05-28 01:16:52 PM
It's time to erect an electric fence around Kansas and then watch as political revolution unfolds when Kansan plutocrats are dragged kicking and screaming to the guillotines. Or the electric bleachers.
 
2012-05-28 01:16:59 PM
LouDobbsAwaaaay: Mods are being shiat stains. I see a particular troll (who apparently I am not allowed to name without a form of repercussion I also am not allowed to name) has a very elite, protected status.

You volunteered, didn't you? We're paying you, aren't we?
 
2012-05-28 01:17:23 PM
The wealthiest individuals in Kansas are now tax-exempt? I presume they're envious of Greece's success with that policy.
 
2012-05-28 01:18:15 PM
LouDobbsAwaaaay: Mods are being shiat stains. I see a particular troll (who apparently I am not allowed to name without a form of repercussion I also am not allowed to name) has a very elite, protected status.

Meh. Just like the GOP ruining Kansas, it wouldn't work if the people affected didn't invite it. I've seen trolls on Youtube get less attention than they get here.
 
2012-05-28 01:18:20 PM
A Terrible Human: she was one of the most racist people I've known

My grandma was born and raised in Hutchinson, daughter of French and German immigrants. Racist as hell. When her daughter - my aunt - had just given birth to her biracial baby girl, grandma was in the room trying to convince her to put it up for adoption.

She gave my brother a lecture when he was in high school about how he shouldn't be dating a black girl. Pissed me right off.

She's evolved a bit, but damn.

/css
 
2012-05-28 01:18:51 PM
germ78: The wealthiest individuals in Kansas are now tax-exempt? I presume they're envious of Greece's success with that policy.

I was thinking the same thing. Massive austerity and tax-exempt status hard-wired into the law for the rich. Looks like the GOP just loves the way Greece handles its economy.
 
2012-05-28 01:18:57 PM
lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.


We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.
 
2012-05-28 01:18:59 PM
LargeCanine: Reduce gov't revenues and cut taxes. Awesome. Plus I know a girl there. Just might move to Kansas.

Good. Morons like you need to be quarantined.
 
2012-05-28 01:20:28 PM
spongeboob: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

Which state without income tax are you talking about?


Several states do not have state income taxes, although I'd hardly call them shining success stories...

Florida
Nevada
South Dakota
Texas
Washington
Wyoming
 
2012-05-28 01:20:43 PM
Let's just observe the typical Republican pattern here:

- campaign on low taxes
- make their base pay more taxes (either as an overall proportion of revenues, or a raise generally)
- campaign on low taxes, cutting "government waste" (like education!) and lady uteruses
- get re-elected by the same people they're farking over

I have to say this is a very effective scam.
 
2012-05-28 01:21:00 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.


So you're the state equivalent of a cadillac-driving welfare queen. Congratulations.
 
2012-05-28 01:21:02 PM
The Name: LouDobbsAwaaaay: Mods are being shiat stains. I see a particular troll (who apparently I am not allowed to name without a form of repercussion I also am not allowed to name) has a very elite, protected status.

Meh. Just like the GOP ruining Kansas, it wouldn't work if the people affected didn't invite it. I've seen trolls on Youtube get less attention than they get here.


I just wasn't aware there were mods hanging around waiting to pounce on and delete any post leveled at one of their protected page-click-generators that compromises the operation.
 
2012-05-28 01:21:58 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.


If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?
 
2012-05-28 01:25:08 PM
CrackpipeCardozo: This plan is two-fold: KS has a balanced budget amendment, so the revenue shortfalls must be compensated for by slashing services. The stage is already being set by the local knee-jerks for assigning blame when (not if, but when) this plan explodes into a spectacular failure: the sunsetting of the Bush-era tax cuts. Brownback came out and publically announced that something like 20K jobs will be created by 2018 as a direct result of this tax policy, but blame is already being assigned to the Obama administration for when these jobs don't come to fruition. Counties are going to have to bump their ad valorem property and sales taxes to compensate for the shortfalls, but even these measures won't come close to addressing the tangled knot that this clusterfark is going to create.

I say, firebomb this state. Let the GOP have their way with it in every way they possibly want: abortion, regulation, tax policy, gutting state services. Let this state become the petri dish for the rest of the nation to examine and say "well, it was a good run conservatives, but now we'll let the adults handle things."


Actually, the GOP HAS had it's way in KS for all of our lifetimes + forever and we are doing very well thank you very much. All of those horrible reprecussions you talk about in your post have actually happened, not in Kansas, though, but in wonderful examples of unfettered LIBERAL government......you know.......like Detroit. I would tell you to save your firebombs for that workers paradise, but the few remaining residents already did most of the work for you.
 
2012-05-28 01:25:41 PM
A Terrible Human: Confabulat: Let's find the stupidest people in the world and wonder why they're so poor and live in a flat dirty shiathole filled with nothing but corn and idiots for miles and miles in every direction.

My grandmother grew up there during the 40's and her parents were german immigrants,1934 actually. But anyways she was one of the most racist people I've known and I've had a bipolar guy do a full on nazi salute in my living room. The weirdest thing? She was a holocaust denier which caused quite a bit of issues with a great,great uncle of mine. He liberated one of the camps and when I was a kid I never understood why his wife would be in the kitchen sitting at the table just chatting up a storm with my grandma and he'd be sitting in the living room looking kinda pissed. All that went away when I learned the other bits of info as an adult.

/Boring,weird story sis
//Kansas sounds like shiathole even compared to southeast Ky.


Southeastern Kentucky definitely isn't THAT bad.
 
2012-05-28 01:27:19 PM
spongeboob: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

Which state without income tax are you talking about?


Two that come to mind - Nevada and Florida. And I have to say, there are doing just fine. Why, housing is very inexpensive. Now.
 
2012-05-28 01:28:33 PM
X-boxershorts: LargeCanine: Reduce gov't revenues and cut taxes. Awesome. Plus I know a girl there. Just might move to Kansas.

Good. Morons like you need to be quarantined.


Welcome to my Favorite list!
 
2012-05-28 01:30:19 PM
verbaltoxin: I keep seeing this, "haw haw, look at them derpers," but look at your example. Georgia has crops rotting away in the fields due to their stupid immigration laws. That's food that isn't being sold and is going to waste. That means less food going to market and prices are going higher.

The US produces more food than it uses. We're the largest agricultural exporter in the world. This isn't really an issue for anyone making an income that hover around the median and up.
 
2012-05-28 01:31:04 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Actually, the GOP HAS had it's way in KS for all of our lifetimes + forever and we are doing very well thank you very much.

Hahahahahaha.
 
2012-05-28 01:31:45 PM
verbaltoxin: LarryDan43: Kansas is already a welfare state, receiving $1.10 in federal spending for every $1.00 they put in. They will now put in less and take back more. Kansas is duping the other states.

All this right wing crap in the states will go a lot farther to grow federal government, which is the very thing the right is always b*tching about. If the rest of the US has to constantly prop up low tax red states, then we are all going to have more of a say in how they run their business. Starting with their lousy education standards that "teach the controversy."


I am actually kind of curious about that. Since a lot of the funding comes from federal matching dollars, wont the decrease in spending also cause a decrease in federal payments. Not saying they don't go up on that chart of welfare, but they might be getting a lot less in return.

As a secondary note, once Obama wins this next term I would love to see him pull out a commercial about welfare reform....State Welfare Reform. Why should job creating states like CA and NY pay more taxes? Shouldn't the job creating states have their taxes reduced so that they can continue to grow jobs? Job creating states are the key to economic prosperity.
 
2012-05-28 01:31:45 PM
LargeCanine: X-boxershorts: LargeCanine: Reduce gov't revenues and cut taxes. Awesome. Plus I know a girl there. Just might move to Kansas.

Good. Morons like you need to be quarantined.

Welcome to my Favorite list!


Believe me, the honor is mine.
 
2012-05-28 01:31:49 PM
X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?


That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.
 
2012-05-28 01:35:40 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

If that's such a puny amount, feel free to give it back to the Federal government.

Don't worry, we can wait.
 
2012-05-28 01:35:51 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?

That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.


Riiiiiight. Link
 
2012-05-28 01:36:57 PM
So we're going to have a flood of doctors into the state, thereby depressing the salaries of doctors and lawyers?

I wouldn't think the research doctors would leave the state, as many before have suggested, unless some other state is offering no taxes for salaried doctors. People don't usually leave a state just out of spite.
 
2012-05-28 01:39:09 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?

That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.


Give back that 24.7 Billion then. How dare you cut taxes with so much debt owed to your fellow Americans.
That's 8,821 dollars per Kansas resident.

Pay up you stinking scofflaw...
 
2012-05-28 01:41:35 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?

That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.


So let me get this straight..the state of KS is essentially a "small business". I mean that in the sense that compared to other states they are not a huge money maker, but they do okay for themselves.
We have given them tax breaks for the last two decades and they still haven't been able to provide more jobs and increase their profits in order to hire more workers.
Now they are going to further reduce their contribution to the coffers and we should continue to provide them with the breaks? Not sure that makes sense.

If we have given them 24.7 billion dollars wheres the return? At least when we bailed out the banks we had a chance at getting our money back.
 
2012-05-28 01:41:38 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

That's not even enough to keep NPR running for a day, you libtards!
 
2012-05-28 01:41:56 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES! But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.

24 cents or 24.7 billion dollars, they still got more than they paid in, and roughly 2.5 billion dollars per year isn't a bad haul for a state of 2.8 million people. That works out to just under $9000 for every man, woman and child in Kansas every year.

Nice try* but the welfare queen label stands.


* not really
 
2012-05-28 01:43:38 PM
I mistaken multiplied my figures by 10. it should be 2.4 billion and year and about 900 dollars per resident. Sorry for error, but I stand by the point. I would love to receive 900 dollars every year from the Feds.
 
2012-05-28 01:44:44 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES! But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.

24 cents or 24.7 billion dollars, they still got more than they paid in, and roughly 2.5 billion dollars per year isn't a bad haul for a state of 2.8 million people. That works out to just under $9000 for every man, woman and child in Kansas every year.

Nice try* but the welfare queen label stands.


* not really


Uhh..not to white knight the retard, but that "supposedly" was stretched out over two decades...not each year. So its really $9000 over the course of two decades, which isn't staggering, but yeah, the welfare label still stands.
 
2012-05-28 01:44:44 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: verbaltoxin: I keep seeing this, "haw haw, look at them derpers," but look at your example. Georgia has crops rotting away in the fields due to their stupid immigration laws. That's food that isn't being sold and is going to waste. That means less food going to market and prices are going higher.

The US produces more food than it uses. We're the largest agricultural exporter in the world. This isn't really an issue for anyone making an income that hover around the median and up.


What about Georgia residents whose income is below that median? A spike in food prices hits them pretty hard. And they voted for those immigration laws to protect those jobs they didn't want to work in the first place.

The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: CrackpipeCardozo: This plan is two-fold: KS has a balanced budget amendment, so the revenue shortfalls must be compensated for by slashing services. The stage is already being set by the local knee-jerks for assigning blame when (not if, but when) this plan explodes into a spectacular failure: the sunsetting of the Bush-era tax cuts. Brownback came out and publically announced that something like 20K jobs will be created by 2018 as a direct result of this tax policy, but blame is already being assigned to the Obama administration for when these jobs don't come to fruition. Counties are going to have to bump their ad valorem property and sales taxes to compensate for the shortfalls, but even these measures won't come close to addressing the tangled knot that this clusterfark is going to create.

I say, firebomb this state. Let the GOP have their way with it in every way they possibly want: abortion, regulation, tax policy, gutting state services. Let this state become the petri dish for the rest of the nation to examine and say "well, it was a good run conservatives, but now we'll let the adults handle things."

Actually, the GOP HAS had it's way in KS for all of our lifetimes + forever and we are doing very well thank you very much. All of those horrible reprecussions you talk about in your post have actually happened, not in Kansas, though, but in wonderful examples of unfettered LIBERAL government......you know.......like Detroit. I would tell you to save your firebombs for that workers paradise, but the few remaining residents already did most of the work for you.


And you can thank the federal government for putting prisons, military bases and farm subsidies in your state so people do have jobs there, because your state government isn't doing f*ck all to help you and yours. You didn't even read the Governor's budget. Most of your state's money goes to education, and you all voted to cut it and shift the tax burden onto those who make the least money. But hey, at least you all get to be admin. assistants and janitors at Boeing - oh wait, they took a million bucks from you and moved out anyway. Well, at least there's still Raytheon. You can clean toilets and shuffle paperwork at Raytheon, while out of staters move in and get the good jobs there. Oh and prison guards. You can all still be prison guards.

So you're right, there are lots of opportunities in Kansas - if you work in defense, got your primary education in another state, hold an engineering or sciences degree, and have some military service to boot. I'm sure I could move down to Kansas and find myself a great job. You and other native Kansans? You can take out my trash for me. It's all you'll be educated enough to do anyway.
 
2012-05-28 01:46:18 PM
mygrandfathertaughtme.files.wordpress.com

Historian 1: "WTF happened here?"
Historian 2: "Republican policies: implemented and carried out to their inevitable conclusion."
 
2012-05-28 01:46:37 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES! But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.

24 cents or 24.7 billion dollars, they still got more than they paid in, and roughly 2.5 billion dollars per year isn't a bad haul for a state of 2.8 million people. That works out to just under $9000 for every man, woman and child in Kansas every year.

Nice try* but the welfare queen label stands.


* not really


Math fail.

24.7 / 20 = 1.235 billion annually over that period which is fairly close to the break even point considering the amounts of money involved here. Also, consider the heavy military presence in the state ( 3 major installations ) and I think we can call it a wash.
 
2012-05-28 01:46:37 PM
simkatu: So we're going to have a flood of doctors into the state, thereby depressing the salaries of doctors and lawyers?

I wouldn't think the research doctors would leave the state, as many before have suggested, unless some other state is offering no taxes for salaried doctors. People don't usually leave a state just out of spite.


Maybe not out of spite, but what happens when these cuts affect everything else? What happens when Kansas begins to see the same kinds of service cuts Wisconsin has? What happens if the schools begin declining in quality?

I wouldn't be so sure they're all going to stick around.
 
2012-05-28 01:47:04 PM
gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.

While you're looking at the information, did the people who voted for this bill offer to take a pay cut?

I don't know.
Did 0bama offer to take a pay cut after passing his tax cuts last year?

Well, President Obama is not trying to cripple the economy and decimate the middle and lower classes in favor of the Republican Party.


okay. no one is.

how is giving lowering the tax rates to the poor AND lowering sales tax decimating the middle and lower classes?
please show your work.
 
2012-05-28 01:48:04 PM
Krymson Tyde: "Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income."

Unfarkingbelievable.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present your GOP!


I got out in March. fark Kansas. And fark Sam Wayback. He is truly the worst governor imaginable.
 
2012-05-28 01:48:33 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?

That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.


Your link disproves your point. Kansas spent more than they took in. That means states who took in less than they paid are covering your asses. Like up here in Nebraska, where we had $44 bn left over. You're welcome for that.
 
2012-05-28 01:48:41 PM
LOL I give up. It should be divided by 20, not 10 bringing the annual Kansas citizen subsity down to $450. That's a far cry from the outrageous $9000 my poor math skills came up with a few minutes ago. But welfare is welfare and the residents of Kansas are still getting a free ride whether it's $10,000 or 10 cents.
 
2012-05-28 01:48:50 PM
This is some stupid ass persons opinion of what could happen with these new laws, not what the law actually says.
 
2012-05-28 01:49:06 PM
Trolljegeren: [mygrandfathertaughtme.files.wordpress.com image 300x240]

Historian 1: "WTF happened here?"
Historian 2: "Republican policies: implemented and carried out to their inevitable conclusion."


That picture looks far more like Detroit than Kansas but go right ahead with your absurd talking points.
 
2012-05-28 01:49:29 PM
Cut education and social services to the bone in order to allow the wealthy to go completely tax free, and shift the remaining tax burden onto the struggling middle class.

How come when Democrats suggest addressing the deficit through a balanced approach of spending cuts and revenue increases (largely by simply letting the bush tax cuts expire for the very wealthy), it's called "class warfare"? But when Republicans actually do stuff like this that enormously benefits the very rich at the expense of the poor and middle class, it's not called "class warfare"?
 
2012-05-28 01:49:39 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.


That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark. Keep it up, retard.
 
2012-05-28 01:50:28 PM
atomic-age: Krymson Tyde: "Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income."

Unfarkingbelievable.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present your GOP!

I got out in March. fark Kansas. And fark Sam Wayback. He is truly the worst governor imaginable.


I hope the door didn't hit you in the ass on the way out...............well yeah, I do.
 
2012-05-28 01:50:37 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Also, consider the heavy military presence in the state ( 3 major installations ) and I think we can call it a wash.

Donor states like California and New York have military bases as well, so how does this make Kansas less of a welfare state?
 
2012-05-28 01:51:45 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Trolljegeren: [mygrandfathertaughtme.files.wordpress.com image 300x240]

Historian 1: "WTF happened here?"
Historian 2: "Republican policies: implemented and carried out to their inevitable conclusion."

That picture looks far more like Detroit than Kansas but go right ahead with your absurd talking points.


You're right. Everything's just rosy in Kansas. No problems with sex trafficking or anything like that. Link

So add "hooker" to prison guard, janitor and secretary to the glorious opportunities available to Kansas' middle class.
 
2012-05-28 01:53:06 PM
The Why Not Guy: LOL I give up. It should be divided by 20, not 10 bringing the annual Kansas citizen subsity down to $450. That's a far cry from the outrageous $9000 my poor math skills came up with a few minutes ago. But welfare is welfare and the residents of Kansas are still getting a free ride whether it's $10,000 or 10 cents.

What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.
 
2012-05-28 01:54:34 PM
Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.
 
2012-05-28 01:56:52 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.

How is my tax refund a free ride?
 
2012-05-28 01:57:13 PM
FTA: All income of farmers will be exempt from tax.

That's one way to keep the younger generation working in agriculture, I suppose.

Here in Canada if we made that sort of decision, it would hardly change our tax revenues, but it would benefit our extremely precarious agricultural sectors.

The more awkward question is, how about farm labour? Do the workers still get taxed, despite making a pittance?
 
2012-05-28 01:58:01 PM
Good, let them try their little experiment on a state I don't live in.
 
2012-05-28 02:00:38 PM
They can always make money as the location for a new Spider-Man movie

///which will crash and burn as Kansas is so flat
 
2012-05-28 02:00:42 PM
Only non-wage income will be exempt from taxes. An obvious move to free up money so small businesses can hire more employees. This doesn't mean that a doctor, lawyer or any other person can avoid paying taxes on their income just by claiming that they're a partner in a business.

Stop believing the first piece of bullshiat you read and take the time to look up other sources for the story.
 
2012-05-28 02:01:21 PM
verbaltoxin: What about Georgia residents whose income is below that median? A spike in food prices hits them pretty hard. And they voted for those immigration laws to protect those jobs they didn't want to work in the first place.

The GOP is very adept at getting people to vote against their interests.

But I suspect that the majority of folks who would be affected by any price increase with fresh produce in these cases couldn't afford decent, fresh produce to begin with. That's a different economic problem.
 
2012-05-28 02:01:21 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: LeoffDaGrate: tenpoundsofcheese: It is a meaningless, political, label.

There is a difference between a state that voted 75% for one party vs. a state that voted 50.1% for one party. But in this chart they would be the same.

Will someone PLEASE save this the next time tenpoundsofcheese goes off on one of his rants about Democrats?

are you unable to save this? you can use cut and paste.


I'm noticing that you completely glossed over the not-so-subtle jabs at your hypocrisy. Possibly because you're not willing to own up to it, possibly because you're too stupid to see it.

I have no idea what you are talking about but since you seem unable to save a simple post, I don't think what you say is relevant.
 
2012-05-28 02:01:52 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.

How is my tax refund a free ride?


He's calling you poor. Implying that it means your argument is invalid, since your poor. You, are feeding him, steak, and he's asking for more, and you......are farking giving it to him. He's already laid out his "fark you, I got mine" argument, and yet you keep going back for more.

See, This is why we cant have nice things.
 
2012-05-28 02:02:48 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.

How is my tax refund a free ride?


Didn't you know? If you get a tax refund it's the equivalent of paying no taxes!

/what derpers actually think
 
2012-05-28 02:03:26 PM
verbaltoxin: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: lennavan: I dunno, it's really hard not to just giggle. The GOP isn't exactly secretive about what it wants to do. Is anyone who pays any damn attention shocked by this?

Keep on votin GOP Kansas. You're gettin what you deserve. For the rest who didn't vote for those doucebags in power, just farking move already.

We are getting what we deserve, actually. We have a vibrant economy, unemployment far below the national average and a much lower tax burden than other more "progressive" states. Yeah, how are those high taxes working for you California? Illinois?

As for the few remaining Democrats in our state? If they moved away tomorrow I highly doubt anybody would notice.

If the Kansas economy is so vibrant and uplifting of the poor, why does Kansas take in so much more in aid to the poor than they pay out in taxes?

That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.

Your link disproves your point. Kansas spent more than they took in. That means states who took in less than they paid are covering your asses. Like up here in Nebraska, where we had $44 bn left over. You're welcome for that.


I see you missed my point entirely, then. My point is that people here are saying that Kansas is some kind of huge welfare state which is bleeding the government dry. Facts show that the amount of money we received over a 20 year span in federal spending over what we paid in taxes is pretty small, especially compared with what the federal government spent in total over that same period. To call that number a rounding error would be a gross exaggeration.
 
2012-05-28 02:03:47 PM
The 'Kansas Eat The Rich Act of 2014' will rectify this.
 
2012-05-28 02:04:10 PM
casual disregard: This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.


Or as I prefer to call it, Junction City.
 
2012-05-28 02:04:32 PM
simkatu: So we're going to have a flood of doctors into the state, thereby depressing the salaries of doctors and lawyers?

I wouldn't think the research doctors would leave the state, as many before have suggested, unless some other state is offering no taxes for salaried doctors. People don't usually leave a state just out of spite.


I don't know if "flood" of doctors into the state would be accurate. I'm sure some people would be attracted to it, and it's a bonus for any doctor already considering it. However, doctors make pretty good money wherever they are and I just can't imagine many of them of them thinking "Hey, I should move to that shiathole so I can be tax exempt. This salary just isn't quite cutting it and I'd be so much better off without having to pay income taxes."
 
2012-05-28 02:04:40 PM
farking morons.

/thanks for making nebraska look good, though.
 
2012-05-28 02:05:10 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: I see you missed my point entirely, then. My point is that people here are saying that Kansas is some kind of huge welfare state which is bleeding the government dry. Facts show that the amount of money we received over a 20 year span in federal spending over what we paid in taxes is pretty small, especially compared with what the federal government spent in total over that same period. To call that number a rounding error would be a gross exaggeration.

If you didn't need it, give it back.
 
2012-05-28 02:05:34 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.

How is my tax refund a free ride?


Was the amount of your refund greater than the amount you paid in federal taxes throughout the year? That would be a free ride. A lot of people fall into this category.
 
2012-05-28 02:07:45 PM
atomic-age: casual disregard: This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.


Or as I prefer to call it, Junction City.


Way to make yourself look stupid. Google that really fast and tell me what's located there.
 
2012-05-28 02:07:52 PM
TsarTom: Wow. Arizona and Florida may get all the press, but once in a while Kansas will come out of nowhere and completely blow you away with something so massively retarded it can actually change the frame of reference.

Seriously. This. From now on, my standard of stupidity is the Kansas Tax Law standard.
 
2012-05-28 02:08:17 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Was the amount of your refund greater than the amount you paid in federal taxes throughout the year?

No, it was not. Now please back up your claim and explain how my tax refund is a free ride.
 
2012-05-28 02:08:30 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: My point is that people here are saying that Kansas is some kind of huge welfare state which is bleeding the government dry.

Nice strawman. Nobody has claimed Kansas is "bleeding the government dry." It is, however, a welfare state. And once these new tax provisions go into place, it's going to get worse.
 
2012-05-28 02:09:48 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.
 
2012-05-28 02:10:04 PM
Sleeping Monkey: spongeboob: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

Which state without income tax are you talking about?

Several states do not have state income taxes, although I'd hardly call them shining success stories...

Florida
Nevada
South Dakota
Texas
Washington
Wyoming


Yeah, but here's the rub: Kansas didn't eliminate them for everyone, just the rich folks and corporations. If you get a paycheck, you're still pay taxes in Kansas.

Eliminating income taxes for all residents, I'm OK with that because you can [sort of] make it up with sales taxes, property taxes, and other sources that hit everyone equally. That's exactly NOT what Kansas has done.

The law of unintended consequences, she is a harsh mistress and she isn't even going to spit on it before going into Kansas.
 
2012-05-28 02:10:32 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.


Reality: Kansas is massively cutting social spending in order to completely eliminate taxes on the rich and corporations, with the poor only seeing a miniscule reduction.

Tenpoundsofretard: I'm incapable of considering factors like social spending, so the only thing happening in this story is a reduction even if it's only half a percent!

If I didn't already know you were an idiot, I would suspect you had some kind of "tax tunnel vision."
 
2012-05-28 02:10:43 PM
It's not like it also applies to their federal income tax.
 
2012-05-28 02:12:34 PM
verbaltoxin: In other words, property taxes in Kansas will make living in New York look cheap, drivers licenses $300, $2000 to register a new car, $100/year wheel taxes, $400 speeding tickets, giant student fee and tuition increases at KU and K State, and fees to use the library.

It's pretty f*cking ridiculous these asshats don't realize that cutting government services' budgets doesn't make the demand for those services go away.


Property taxes are already ridiculous. I'm paying half the taxes on twice the house in Colorado. fark Kansas and the idiot Republicans who have done this to a once-decent state.
 
2012-05-28 02:12:42 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Was the amount of your refund greater than the amount you paid in federal taxes throughout the year?

No, it was not. Now please back up your claim and explain how my tax refund is a free ride.


Since a pretty healthy percentage of tax filers, especially in the lower brackets, get back more than they pay in it was a reasonable assumption. If that is not the case then it certainly is not a free ride. Congratulations.
 
2012-05-28 02:12:51 PM
Sleeping Monkey: Several states do not have state income taxes, although I'd hardly call them shining success stories.

But the poster I was responding to made it sound like it was one state only, and that it the shining success of all states.dali's perspective: spongeboob: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

Which state without income tax are you talking about?

Two that come to mind - Nevada and Florida. And I have to say, there are doing just fine. Why, housing is very inexpensive. Now.


Yes why can't the US as a whole be more like Florida and Nevada.
 
2012-05-28 02:13:51 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.


Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.
 
2012-05-28 02:17:01 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.


Oh, we know what's going on, we're just scratching our heads and trying to figure out why so many people are rejecting the concept of the "Public Commons" and selectively quoting "founding fathers" in doing so while ignoring the reality that "The Public Commons" was one of the founding principles behind the events that led up to the declaration of independence and the war against Britain.

If you think that what Kansas is doing here will benefit Kansans, just consider the 25 BILLION dollar budget shortfall that Texas is facing. The very low standards of health care in Texas. The extreme degredation of air quality in Texas, especially in and around Houston and Dallas.

Texas Air quality comparison: Link

Texas health care: Link

Texas Poverty: Link

Texas education: Link

Record numbers of Texans on Food Stamps: Link

Kansas will parallel Texas.

And you low tax fraudulent fake libertarians should just be forced to read ALL of the Federalist papers to find out how badly you're being lied to.

The Federalist Papers from the Library of Congress. ALL of them

God save us from these ignorant farking morons.
 
2012-05-28 02:17:56 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.


http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".
 
2012-05-28 02:19:05 PM
Kansas legislature and Governor:

i258.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-28 02:19:10 PM
odinsposse: Not farked, just evil. There are several states with no income taxes at all. They get revenue from other taxes. So even if this law eliminates income taxes for their professional workers the state will still get income and won't collapse. It just punishes people for not being one of those workers and those are just the kind of people who don't have the mobility to quit their job and leave for another state.

Punishing poor people for being poor is undeniably evil but the state won't die because of it.


Wait, that isn't true. Conservatives have been telling me over and over again that the wealthy pay SOOO much more in taxes and the lower-wage and poor people hardly pay any.

If you take away the tax money from the only people that actually contribute financially to the state government, how will the state continue to support said government? How will they keep roads, sewers, Brownback's salary, national guard, police, etc? Everything maybe having significant use fees, like Colorado Springs?
 
2012-05-28 02:20:04 PM
I love it when fundies/teabaggers cut off their noses to spite their faces.
 
2012-05-28 02:20:53 PM
If I had to live In Junction City I would be a pretty angry person too...
 
2012-05-28 02:21:22 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.


And when he touts how Kansas well is doing so well he ignores the poor. I see a pattern.
 
2012-05-28 02:21:45 PM
X-boxershorts: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.

Oh, we know what's going on, we're just scratching our heads and trying to figure out why so many people are rejecting the concept of the "Public Commons" and selectively quoting "founding fathers" in doing so while ignoring the reality that "The Public Commons" was one of the founding principles behind the events that led up to the declaration of independence and the war against Britain.

If you think that what Kansas is doing here will benefit Kansans, just consider the 25 BILLION dollar budget shortfall that Texas is facing. The very low standards of health care in Texas. The extreme degredation of air quality in Texas, especially in and around Houston and Dallas.

Texas Air quality comparison: Link

Texas health care: Link

Texas Poverty: Link

Texas education: Link

Record numbers of Texans on Food Stamps: Link

Kansas will parallel Texas.

And you low tax fraudulent fake libertarians should just be forced to read ALL of the Federalist papers to find out how badly you're being lied to.

The Federalist Papers from the Library of Congress. ALL of them

God save us from these ignorant farking morons.


Air quality issues around Houston and Dallas? Could that be because there are heavy concentrations of industry there ( WHERE PEOPLE HAVE JOBS )?

Health Care and Poverty problems? You mean that a state with huge, unskilled and impoverished illegal immigrant population there are problems with health care, poverty and education?! SAY IT AINT SO!!!
 
2012-05-28 02:21:50 PM
Wonderful job Kansas! You just helped re-create a key tenet of serfdom from the 1100s.
 
2012-05-28 02:22:31 PM
Kansas desperately needs stronger mandatory helmet laws.

/not talking about motorcycles
 
2012-05-28 02:22:57 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".


There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.
 
2012-05-28 02:24:00 PM
Be nice to see a good old-fashioned uprising from the common folk....factories burnt to the ground, houses looted and being squatted in, gated communities run like compounds and Benz' smashed in on the side of the road with the rotting corpses lying ten feet away.

I'd be up for seeing it firsthand if it was anywhere but mouth-breather central there.
 
2012-05-28 02:24:48 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".

There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.


Yet EITC is pretty much the only one that will get you to negative tax liability. You know this so just admit what you did and move on.
 
2012-05-28 02:25:50 PM
Skarekrough: Be nice to see a good old-fashioned uprising from the common folk....factories burnt to the ground, houses looted and being squatted in, gated communities run like compounds and Benz' smashed in on the side of the road with the rotting corpses lying ten feet away.

I'd be up for seeing it firsthand if it was anywhere but mouth-breather central there.


You mean like Detroit?
 
2012-05-28 02:25:54 PM
Cheesus: Oh, this will be a wonderful experiment! Let's see how it turns out!

/note to self: underline, bold, and add a few more exclamation marks to your previous 'Stay away from Kansas!!!' note


I'm not entirely convinced this will be an unmitigated disaster. Some very progressive states get by with no income tax at all.
 
2012-05-28 02:26:52 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.

Oh, we know what's going on, we're just scratching our heads and trying to figure out why so many people are rejecting the concept of the "Public Commons" and selectively quoting "founding fathers" in doing so while ignoring the reality that "The Public Commons" was one of the founding principles behind the events that led up to the declaration of independence and the war against Britain.

If you think that what Kansas is doing here will benefit Kansans, just consider the 25 BILLION dollar budget shortfall that Texas is facing. The very low standards of health care in Texas. The extreme degredation of air quality in Texas, especially in and around Houston and Dallas.

Texas Air quality comparison: Link

Texas health care: Link

Texas Poverty: Link

Texas education: Link

Record numbers of Texans on Food Stamps: Link

Kansas will parallel Texas.

And you low tax fraudulent fake libertarians should just be forced to read ALL of the Federalist papers to find out how badly you're being lied to.

The Federalist Papers from the Library of Congress. ALL of them

God save us from these ignorant farking morons.

Air quality issues around Houston and Dallas? Cou ...


Favorite me you ignorant fuq. Strawman du jour fake conservatard bullshiat echo chamber. Illegal immigration has been with us for the duration of this nation asswipe. It's only an issue now because the economy sucks and assholes like you stand between recovery and continuing to wallow in our own shiat.

Your ignorance makes me sick. Your willingness to echo Koch funded glibertarian think tank slogans and ignore very real, very public data shows me the shallowness of your thought process.

I thoroughly despise all that you stand for. YOU GOT NUTHIN
 
2012-05-28 02:30:06 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".

There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.


Which does not, at all, equate to your claim that they are getting a "free ride".

You really need to shut your mouth, as the only thing you're accomplishing at this point is digging further holes for yourself.
 
2012-05-28 02:30:36 PM
Favorite me you ignorant fuq. Strawman du jour fake conservatard bullshiat echo chamber. Illegal immigration has been with us for the duration of this nation asswipe. It's only an issue now because the economy sucks and assholes like you stand between recovery and continuing to wallow in our own shiat.

Your ignorance makes me sick. Your willingness to echo Koch funded glibertarian think tank slogans and ignore very real, very public data shows me the shallowness of your thought process.

I thoroughly despise all that you stand for. YOU GOT NUTHIN


A very well reasoned and thought out response. You must have been captain of your high school debate team.
 
2012-05-28 02:31:05 PM
Sabyen91: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".

There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.

Yet EITC is pretty much the only one that will get you to negative tax liability. You know this so just admit what you did and move on.


You said it better than I did.
 
2012-05-28 02:31:18 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You mean like Detroit?

Is but but but Detroit! the new talking point?
 
2012-05-28 02:32:21 PM
lh3.googleusercontent.com
 
2012-05-28 02:33:17 PM
img522.imageshack.us
 
2012-05-28 02:33:28 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".

There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.

Which does not, at all, equate to your claim that they are getting a "free ride".

You really need to shut your mouth, as the only thing you're accomplishing at this point is digging further holes for yourself.


You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?
 
2012-05-28 02:33:31 PM
Relevant

www-news.uchicago.edu
 
2012-05-28 02:35:49 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Skarekrough: Be nice to see a good old-fashioned uprising from the common folk....factories burnt to the ground, houses looted and being squatted in, gated communities run like compounds and Benz' smashed in on the side of the road with the rotting corpses lying ten feet away.

I'd be up for seeing it firsthand if it was anywhere but mouth-breather central there.

You mean like Detroit?


Except Detroit had Motown, and style.
 
2012-05-28 02:35:59 PM
violetvolume: [lh3.googleusercontent.com image 250x204]


The pot pie on a stick looks awesome...
 
2012-05-28 02:36:30 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You mean like Detroit?

Is but but but Detroit! the new talking point?


I think it's fair to point out that every last horrible consequense that liberals claim will befall Kansas due to their tax policy has already happened..........in Detroit. I have yet to hear anyone reasonably explain that.
 
2012-05-28 02:37:19 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Favorite me you ignorant fuq. Strawman du jour fake conservatard bullshiat echo chamber. Illegal immigration has been with us for the duration of this nation asswipe. It's only an issue now because the economy sucks and assholes like you stand between recovery and continuing to wallow in our own shiat.

Your ignorance makes me sick. Your willingness to echo Koch funded glibertarian think tank slogans and ignore very real, very public data shows me the shallowness of your thought process.

I thoroughly despise all that you stand for. YOU GOT NUTHIN

A very well reasoned and thought out response. You must have been captain of your high school debate team.


It's as valid as the boogieman you pulled out of your ass you unAmerican piece of shiat.
 
2012-05-28 02:38:35 PM
Emposter: Tenpoundsofretard: I'm incapable of considering factors like social spending, so the only thing happening in this story is a reduction even if it's only half a percent!

wow. you doubled down on your mistake

the reduction is 14 percent.

It is a half a percentage point, but the decrease people will see in their tax bill is about 14 percent.

no wonder you have the bad reputation you have here.
 
2012-05-28 02:41:01 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?

I understand that it takes some measure of concentration to actually respond to individual points and form individual responses to those points instead of generalizing every disagreement into one large, conglomerated straw man, but if you can't do that, you really shouldn't be posting on the Internet at all.

At least, if you want to be taken seriously.
 
2012-05-28 02:42:18 PM
X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Favorite me you ignorant fuq. Strawman du jour fake conservatard bullshiat echo chamber. Illegal immigration has been with us for the duration of this nation asswipe. It's only an issue now because the economy sucks and assholes like you stand between recovery and continuing to wallow in our own shiat.

Your ignorance makes me sick. Your willingness to echo Koch funded glibertarian think tank slogans and ignore very real, very public data shows me the shallowness of your thought process.

I thoroughly despise all that you stand for. YOU GOT NUTHIN

A very well reasoned and thought out response. You must have been captain of your high school debate team.

It's as valid as the boogieman you pulled out of your ass you unAmerican piece of shiat.


This is too funny.
 
2012-05-28 02:44:34 PM
The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Also, consider the heavy military presence in the state ( 3 major installations ) and I think we can call it a wash.

Donor states like California and New York have military bases as well, so how does this make Kansas less of a welfare state?


Why did the District of Columbia, clearly one of the most liberal places in the country, take in $5.55 in federal spending for every dollar of federal tax paid? (2005 - other years vary - 2004, the year of the famous chart above was $6.28)

What a bunch of welfare queens!!!

/statement may be true in several other contexts
 
2012-05-28 02:44:58 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You mean like Detroit?

Is but but but Detroit! the new talking point?

I think it's fair to point out that every last horrible consequense that liberals claim will befall Kansas due to their tax policy has already happened..........in Detroit. I have yet to hear anyone reasonably explain that.


Detroit's economy didn't tank because of tax policies; it was primarily due to the fact that it was a heavy manufacturing city (automotive in particular), and those jobs ended up being outsourced or lost due to oversees competition. What the hell did tax policies have to do with it?

Beyond that, you paint the city like it's a sh*thole through and through, which is simply not the case.
 
2012-05-28 02:45:18 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?


Try voting Democratic in Kansas - see where that gets ya.

\live here
\\not farking surprised
 
2012-05-28 02:48:13 PM
I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.
 
2012-05-28 02:48:22 PM
HairBolus: One of the issues the leading up to Civil War was whether Kansas should be a free state or a slave state.

The Union victory decided this as "free".



You may want to brush up on your history a bit.
 
2012-05-28 02:49:30 PM
CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?

Try voting Democratic in Kansas - see where that gets ya.

\live here
\\not farking surprised


well if you are Kathleen Sibelius and you vote for yourself in 2003, you get to be gov until 2009.
 
2012-05-28 02:53:10 PM
TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?

I understand that it takes some measure of concentration to actually respond to individual points and form individual responses to those points instead of generalizing every disagreement into one large, conglomerated straw man, but if you can't do that, you really shouldn't be posting on the Internet at all.

At least, if you want to be taken seriously.



Someone in this thread said that if the state of KS took in 10 cents more than they paid in they are still welfare queens. Am I supposed to take hyperbole like that seriously? But at the same time it's a "strawman" to point out, accurately, that many individual taxpayers get back more than they pay in.

If you say so.
 
2012-05-28 02:54:52 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: Tenpoundsofretard: I'm incapable of considering factors like social spending, so the only thing happening in this story is a reduction even if it's only half a percent!

wow. you doubled down on your mistake

the reduction is 14 percent.

It is a half a percentage point, but the decrease people will see in their tax bill is about 14 percent.

no wonder you have the bad reputation you have here.


There is no mistake. You're just desperately trying to distract from the huge inequity and horrible socio-economic consequences by looking at the miniscule change as a percentage OF the percentage they pay, which looks larger. Of course the decrease the rich and corporations will see is 100%, using that math, but that's not important, I'm sure.

As for having a rep, I'm pretty sure I don't have one. But if I get one as "that dude who calls retarded trolls names, I'll be OK with that.
 
2012-05-28 02:54:53 PM
TheNewJesus: If I had to live In Junction City I would be a pretty angry person too...

I lived in Manhattan, and I was pretty much furious all the time.

Now I live in Colorado, and when people say "so what brought you out here from Kansas?" I answer with one word:

"Kansas".
 
2012-05-28 02:55:26 PM
orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.


Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.
 
2012-05-28 02:55:53 PM
Niii is it true that the WalMart is the only place you can buy guns in Junction City? I imagine their selection is pretty lame...
 
2012-05-28 02:57:47 PM
tenpoundsofcheese

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.



This is one of the funniest statements I've seen all week.

\math fail
\\Kansas school edumacated?
 
2012-05-28 02:58:40 PM
farm folk kin be dum

blacktable.com
 
2012-05-28 02:59:57 PM
yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.


its days like this that make 4chan seem reasonable by comparison. Drew this is nothing to be proud of.
 
2012-05-28 03:00:01 PM
slykens1: Why did the District of Columbia, clearly one of the most liberal places in the country, take in $5.55 in federal spending for every dollar of federal tax paid? (2005 - other years vary - 2004, the year of the famous chart above was $6.28)

Seriously? I mean, really? DC residents pay the highest federal taxes per capita.

The reason DC receives so much federal money is because it's the freaking capital of the country. The federal government operates the courts, there are huge security costs, federal government is exempt from property taxes, and Congress has explicitly forbidden the imposition of certain taxes such as commuter tax.

Good god you're an idiot.
 
2012-05-28 03:00:17 PM
TheNewJesus: Niii is it true that the WalMart is the only place you can buy guns in Junction City? I imagine their selection is pretty lame...

Considering that JC is eat up with pawn shops, I deeply doubt it. Besides, you could always head over to Pat's Pawn & Gun in lovely Ogden, KS.

"Remember, Pat's Pawn & Gun for all your gun needs."
 
2012-05-28 03:00:33 PM
I'm going to get an extra ~$13.91 every two weeks. I'm sure that will go a long, long way towards stimulating the local economy...

/FMS
 
2012-05-28 03:00:56 PM
It's ironic that the conservatives hate socialism so much because their actions are going to bring about real socialism in the US once they've burned everything to the ground. It's going to be an incredibly painful journey to that end. Either that or it's back to feudalism.
 
2012-05-28 03:01:14 PM
yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.


I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.
 
2012-05-28 03:02:52 PM
TheNewJesus: violetvolume: [lh3.googleusercontent.com image 250x204]


The pot pie on a stick looks awesome...


They are awesome, and pardon my ignorance but HOW U DO DAT
 
2012-05-28 03:03:14 PM
Hey Nii what about helium tanks, rubber hoses, and plastic bags. Are those easy to come by in Junction City?
 
2012-05-28 03:03:57 PM
CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.



This is one of the funniest statements I've seen all week.

\math fail
\\Kansas school edumacated?


I don't get it. Seems accurate to me.

Going from 3.5% to 3% represents reduction of 14.29%.
 
2012-05-28 03:04:40 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: ut at the same time it's a "strawman" to point out, accurately, that many individual taxpayers get back more than they pay in.

It's a strawman because you're comparing apples to trees. You're argument amounts to this:

A report shows that kids in Kansas performed, overall, worse than kids in Connecticut on the same standardized test. Then you rejoin with, "But I live in Kansas and got a perfect score!" Doesn't. freaking. matter.

Kids in Kansas are still --wait for it -- worse in the aggregate.

You're really showing off that Kansas edumacation there, buddy.
 
2012-05-28 03:05:43 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.

I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.


Aint gonna do it, nope, I have a will of iron...find your food elsewhere.
/is the pay good? Do you get insurance?
 
2012-05-28 03:05:44 PM
Salt Lick Steady: You're argument amounts to this:

Make that "your argument"; changed the sentence and didn't proofread.
 
2012-05-28 03:06:12 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: ut at the same time it's a "strawman" to point out, accurately, that many individual taxpayers get back more than they pay in.

It's a strawman because you're comparing apples to trees. You're argument amounts to this:

A report shows that kids in Kansas performed, overall, worse than kids in Connecticut on the same standardized test. Then you rejoin with, "But I live in Kansas and got a perfect score!" Doesn't. freaking. matter.

Kids in Kansas are still --wait for it -- worse in the aggregate.

You're really showing off that Kansas edumacation there, buddy.


You can't use words like 'aggregate' in Kansas. They don't work there.
 
2012-05-28 03:06:46 PM
orclover: yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.

its days like this that make 4chan seem reasonable by comparison. Drew this is nothing to be proud of.


What do you care? It's not like you're paying for i--

Oh, I'm so, so sorry.
 
2012-05-28 03:08:27 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?

The difference is that you dismiss Kansas taking in just under 1.25 billion dollars more than they pay out every year as "a wash" while saying "those people" on EITC - or people like me who aren't - are getting a free ride.
 
2012-05-28 03:08:33 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: atomic-age: casual disregard: This is great news for drug smugglers, meth labs, and pimps. The dramatically reduced police force and social services safety net will result in a haven for scum and villainy.


Or as I prefer to call it, Junction City.

Way to make yourself look stupid. Google that really fast and tell me what's located there.


I don't have to; I lived 25 miles away from that festering shiathole for a few years.

What's in JC that you're so proud of? Are you one of the day shift strippers the Foxy is always trying to hire?
 
2012-05-28 03:08:40 PM
AcneVulgaris: Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: ut at the same time it's a "strawman" to point out, accurately, that many individual taxpayers get back more than they pay in.

It's a strawman because you're comparing apples to trees. You're argument amounts to this:

A report shows that kids in Kansas performed, overall, worse than kids in Connecticut on the same standardized test. Then you rejoin with, "But I live in Kansas and got a perfect score!" Doesn't. freaking. matter.

Kids in Kansas are still --wait for it -- worse in the aggregate.

You're really showing off that Kansas edumacation there, buddy.

You can't use words like 'aggregate' in Kansas. They don't work there.


Sure they can, they just shouldn't be surprised if the other person thinks they are talking about gravel...
 
2012-05-28 03:09:05 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.

I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.


What lefty echo chamber? Fark isn't very left-wing at all, it's more libertarian than anything else. There are avowed conservatives and Republicans that get along just fine with their liberal / democrat counterparts. But anyone who has been here long enough can spot the right-wing troll schtick a mile away. You're wearing it like a badge.

Get a new act, bozo. Nobody's buying this one.
 
2012-05-28 03:09:06 PM
Salt Lick Steady: Seriously? I mean, really? DC residents pay the highest federal taxes per capita.

The reason DC receives so much federal money is because it's the freaking capital of the country. The federal government operates the courts, there are huge security costs, federal government is exempt from property taxes, and Congress has explicitly forbidden the imposition of certain taxes such as commuter tax.

Good god you're an idiot.


Looks like the point of my post passed you by, idiot.

Looking at per-dollar return on federal taxes is a pretty moronic way to determine whether a state is a "welfare queen" for the very reasons you espoused. Federal spending is not even per capita across the states. Some states have lots of federal institutions (DC, for example), some have very few in comparison to their population.

A more interesting analysis would be assistance spending from the federal level to states for things like Medicaid and Education, as examples. I would exclude spending related to the operation of the government, military, Medicare, and Social Security.
 
2012-05-28 03:10:53 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.

All you've done is repeat conservative talking points. You've ignored the fact that the poor, who pay less in federal taxes, pay much more of a percentage of their income in other taxes. You've used ad hominem repeatedly. You're advocating a regressive system of taxation. You really don't have anything of value to contribute.

Unless you'd like to argue why a regressive system is superior to a progressive one. Care to?
 
2012-05-28 03:11:24 PM
Doc Daneeka: CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.



This is one of the funniest statements I've seen all week.

\math fail
\\Kansas school edumacated?

I don't get it. Seems accurate to me.

Going from 3.5% to 3% represents reduction of 14.29%.


I really was horrible at math when I was younger, but I got the same answer as well.
 
2012-05-28 03:12:16 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: ut at the same time it's a "strawman" to point out, accurately, that many individual taxpayers get back more than they pay in.

It's a strawman because you're comparing apples to trees. You're argument amounts to this:

A report shows that kids in Kansas performed, overall, worse than kids in Connecticut on the same standardized test. Then you rejoin with, "But I live in Kansas and got a perfect score!" Doesn't. freaking. matter.

Kids in Kansas are still --wait for it -- worse in the aggregate.

You're really showing off that Kansas edumacation there, buddy.


Your analogy is like trying to jam a square peg into a round hole, it just doesn't fit. Once again, explain to me how a state receiving more in government money than it paid in makes it any more of a welfare queen than an individual who receives more than they pay in.
 
2012-05-28 03:12:24 PM
Emposter: looking at the miniscule change as a percentage OF the percentage they pay, which looks larger.

No. You still don't get it.

If a person's tax rate goes down from 3.5% to 3% that is not a decrease in their taxes of a half a percent.

If they earned $10,000 and had a tax bill of $350 but now they have a tax bill of $300. Do you still think their taxes went down by a half a percent? (hint: it did not).
 
2012-05-28 03:14:50 PM
CheapEngineer: tenpoundsofcheese

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.



This is one of the funniest statements I've seen all week.

\math fail
\\Kansas school edumacated?


please explain why.
difficulty: you need to show your math.

I'll wait.
 
2012-05-28 03:15:30 PM
yelmrog: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: yelmrog: orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.

Since it's typically the Mods who do the conservatard trolling, then yeah. I guess you could say that they are paid to threadshiat. Every once in a while, people will start getting fed up and the politics tab will slow down quite a bit. Some alts will get banned, people will start filtering back into the tab, and the cycle restarts. My most recent memory of this was the Phil Herup / Black Animal days.

I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.

What lefty echo chamber? Fark isn't very left-wing at all, it's more libertarian than anything else. There are avowed conservatives and Republicans that get along just fine with their liberal / democrat counterparts. But anyone who has been here long enough can spot the right-wing troll schtick a mile away. You're wearing it like a badge.

Get a new act, bozo. Nobody's buying this one.


That seems like the M.O. of a lot of people around here. Simply label anyone who disagrees with them as a troll without making a single intelligent response and call it a day.

Whatever floats your boat pal.
 
2012-05-28 03:16:11 PM
You know how they did that whole nasty porn thing with the Santorum name? Can we do that with Brownback?

"I considered going all Santorum, but I decided to Brownback her instead"

Please?
 
2012-05-28 03:17:05 PM
slykens1: Looks like the point of my post passed you by, idiot.

Point taken, and apologies for jumping the gun and using ad hominem.

This data from 2005 puts Kansas at 30

Only includes childhood nutrition, TANF, food assistance, and WIC. No medicaid and general education included.
 
2012-05-28 03:17:45 PM
TheNewJesus: You know how they did that whole nasty porn thing with the Santorum name? Can we do that with Brownback?

"I considered going all Santorum, but I decided to Brownback her instead"

Please?


Mr. Atomic and I always called him Browncock or Bareback; pretty convinced he's closeted.
 
2012-05-28 03:19:41 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Once again, explain to me how a state receiving more in government money than it paid in makes it any more of a welfare queen than an individual who receives more than they pay in.

Because nobody is arguing that certain individuals receive more federal money than they pay in taxes. Nobody is arguing that point.

You really don't understand the concept of individual versus aggregate? Comparisons of populations as whole versus individuals?
 
2012-05-28 03:21:41 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Once again, explain to me how a state receiving more in government money than it paid in makes it any more of a welfare queen than an individual who receives more than they pay in.

Because nobody is arguing that certain individuals receive more federal money than they pay in taxes. Nobody is arguing that point.

You really don't understand the concept of individual versus aggregate? Comparisons of populations as whole versus individuals?


(The aggregate of Kansas is white. Those welfare queens are exclusively black.)

^GOP logic.
 
2012-05-28 03:21:55 PM
I know this is late in the thread, but there is a unremarked reason that this is going to fail very hard.

Kansas has been able to attract a lot of business because not only did they give tax incentives, but they had really awesome public schools and universities that the middle/upper middle class wanted. Cutting so much revenue is apparently going to be coming out of the schools. So while a young doctor looking for a place to build a practice might like the idea of no state taxes (saving maybe 4-10k a year), they are really NOT going to want to locate in a place that the school districts are in freefall. They really haven't thought their clever plan through. Kansas doesn't have a large number of students in private/parochial schools since the public schools have always done so well. I foresee a major shock from this.
 
2012-05-28 03:23:04 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: I'm terribly sorry I ruined your lefty echo chamber with my pesky facts.

All you've done is repeat conservative talking points. You've ignored the fact that the poor, who pay less in federal taxes, pay much more of a percentage of their income in other taxes. You've used ad hominem repeatedly. You're advocating a regressive system of taxation. You really don't have anything of value to contribute.

Unless you'd like to argue why a regressive system is superior to a progressive one. Care to?


Slapping labels on something is a poor substitute for intelligent debate.

As for taxation, lets see here. The poor most likely have negative taxation on both federal and state taxes. The poor do pay sales tax (also being cut under the new KS tax law by the way ). The poor, most likely, do not own property or if they do it's not very valuable and thusly does not incur a huge tax liability.

Tell me again how the evil tax system is hurting them again?
 
2012-05-28 03:24:23 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: looking at the miniscule change as a percentage OF the percentage they pay, which looks larger.

No. You still don't get it.

If a person's tax rate goes down from 3.5% to 3% that is not a decrease in their taxes of a half a percent.

If they earned $10,000 and had a tax bill of $350 but now they have a tax bill of $300. Do you still think their taxes went down by a half a percent? (hint: it did not).


I can't decide what makes this funnier. A) The fact that you think looking at it as a percent of a percent, which makes it look bigger , actually makes it bigger or even begins to make up for the huge inequities and cuts to social services, or B) the fact that you can't even figure out that you're restating exactly what I said in the post you quoted. (hint: 0.5% is 14% of 3.5%...a percent of a percent. Learn to read.)

Just think! In a generation or two, every child that comes out of the hugely underfunded Kansas educational system will be as dumb as you. Then they can go on to dead end jobs with no social safety net, happy and secure in the fact that the people whose floors they clean pay no income taxes.
 
2012-05-28 03:24:50 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: That seems like the M.O. of a lot of people around here. Simply label anyone who disagrees with them as a troll without making a single intelligent response and call it a day.

As I said before, there are plenty of conservatives who leave comments here that don't get accused of trollery.

But for most of the people on this tab who have been around a while, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc...

Seriously. Look up some of the old threads and you'll see what I'm talking about.
 
2012-05-28 03:26:02 PM
madgonad: I know this is late in the thread, but there is a unremarked reason that this is going to fail very hard.

Kansas has been able to attract a lot of business because not only did they give tax incentives, but they had really awesome public schools and universities that the middle/upper middle class wanted. Cutting so much revenue is apparently going to be coming out of the schools. So while a young doctor looking for a place to build a practice might like the idea of no state taxes (saving maybe 4-10k a year), they are really NOT going to want to locate in a place that the school districts are in freefall. They really haven't thought their clever plan through. Kansas doesn't have a large number of students in private/parochial schools since the public schools have always done so well. I foresee a major shock from this.


Dude are you high? ONE COUNTY (and I know the one you are thinking of) has "quality schools" and that is out of 105 counties. And that ONE COUNTY voted years ago to take on an additional tax burden to make up for cuts.

The other 104 counties, both urban and rural, have had a pretty big mess of lame education for some time. Why do you think Kansas is a red state?
 
2012-05-28 03:27:35 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Once again, explain to me how a state receiving more in government money than it paid in makes it any more of a welfare queen than an individual who receives more than they pay in.

Because nobody is arguing that certain individuals receive more federal money than they pay in taxes. Nobody is arguing that point.

You really don't understand the concept of individual versus aggregate? Comparisons of populations as whole versus individuals?


You really don't seem to understand that the idea is to point out just exactly how silly it is to label someone...........or some population........... a "welfare queen" or any other such thing when they are not.
 
2012-05-28 03:27:55 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: As for taxation, lets see here. The poor most likely have negative taxation on both federal and state taxes. The poor do pay sales tax (also being cut under the new KS tax law by the way ). The poor, most likely, do not own property or if they do it's not very valuable and thusly does not incur a huge tax liability.

You have no sources and nothing to back up your claims. Do you really not understand the concept of a regressive system? (That's not a "label," that's the way it operates.)

Here, get some basic education on the matter

Done with you.
 
2012-05-28 03:30:24 PM
madgonad: I know this is late in the thread, but there is a unremarked reason that this is going to fail very hard.

Kansas has been able to attract a lot of business because not only did they give tax incentives, but they had really awesome public schools and universities that the middle/upper middle class wanted. Cutting so much revenue is apparently going to be coming out of the schools. So while a young doctor looking for a place to build a practice might like the idea of no state taxes (saving maybe 4-10k a year), they are really NOT going to want to locate in a place that the school districts are in freefall. They really haven't thought their clever plan through. Kansas doesn't have a large number of students in private/parochial schools since the public schools have always done so well. I foresee a major shock from this.


The only place in Kansas that has the political and financial clout to fight this is Johnson County, IMO. Other places that are proud of public education--Lawrence, Manhattan--are too politically and financially isolated. Their votes don't count, they are really diluted. Western Kansas won't care; there are very few people, especially of reproductive age, there. I can really see Johnson County making a huge stink. Manhattan and Lawrence will try, but they'll be shouted down. I know people in both cities who are furious, but furious doesn't get you shiat when no matter how much you try to turn out the vote, it always goes Republican.

I blame the Kansas Democratic Party for a lot of this. Sam Bareback might as well have run unopposed for all the supper the KDP gave to Tom Holland. I voted for him, and there were Holland signs on my block, but he received no support from the party. They sat on their hands and let Bareback take it, I suppose hoping he would not be that bad. He's been worse than anyone expected, even me, and I farking hate the guy and wouldn't trust him as far as I could pick him up and throw him.

What he wanted to do to the KNI is un-farking-conscionable.
 
2012-05-28 03:31:49 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: You really don't seem to understand that the idea is to point out just exactly how silly it is to label someone...........or some population........... a "welfare queen" or any other such thing when they are not.

If your argument is that Kansas does not excessively use federal monies, it doesn't help to point out that certain individuals do excessively use federal monies. Get it now? Or are you still fixated on the "don't label me bro!" mantra?

I even provided a link above concerning federal welfare spending that you could use as bait.
 
2012-05-28 03:32:57 PM
Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: As for taxation, lets see here. The poor most likely have negative taxation on both federal and state taxes. The poor do pay sales tax (also being cut under the new KS tax law by the way ). The poor, most likely, do not own property or if they do it's not very valuable and thusly does not incur a huge tax liability.

You have no sources and nothing to back up your claims. Do you really not understand the concept of a regressive system? (That's not a "label," that's the way it operates.)

Here, get some basic education on the matter

Done with you.


The label comment was meant for your assertion that everything I've said was simply "conservative talking points".

I know perfectly well what a regressive tax system is and how it works. Your argument doesn't hold water, however, since those in question pay little or nothing into the system at all in the first place.
 
2012-05-28 03:34:20 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: As for taxation, lets see here. The poor most likely have negative taxation on both federal and state taxes. The poor do pay sales tax (also being cut under the new KS tax law by the way ). The poor, most likely, do not own property or if they do it's not very valuable and thusly does not incur a huge tax liability.

You have no sources and nothing to back up your claims. Do you really not understand the concept of a regressive system? (That's not a "label," that's the way it operates.)

Here, get some basic education on the matter

Done with you.

The label comment was meant for your assertion that everything I've said was simply "conservative talking points".

I know perfectly well what a regressive tax system is and how it works. Your argument doesn't hold water, however, since those in question pay little or nothing into the system at all in the first place.


So do you think that everyone who gets the EITC one year gets it forever?
 
2012-05-28 03:34:59 PM
Salt Lick Steady: Point taken, and apologies for jumping the gun and using ad hominem.

Apology accepted. :) We're all having fun here, right?

I'm probably on the "right" side of things being a fiscal conservative but the law as summarized is incredibly moronic. IMHO net income should be taxed progressively regardless of source.

It is important to note in this deabte, however, that in general most S-corporation owners will pay themselves some (perhaps a significant portion) of their income as wages because the federal government wants its sweet, sweet, FICA and Medicare money. If one were to pay themselves 100% of their income via S-corporation as a distribution they run the very real risk of the federal government reclassifying all of that income as wage and subjecting the taxpayer to back taxes and penalties.

The result of this is that not *all* income received through the S-corp will be exempt from taxes in Kansas, just the potential for a *lot* of it to be.

My tax guy advised me not to push 50/50 on wage/distributions and that 60/40 would be even safer. Considering I live in Pennsylvania this allocation only affects my local and federal FICA/Medicare taxes.

As to the link you provided, federal welfare spending per capita is interesting but isn't necessarily fair. The cost of care and living in New York is significantly higher than in Kansas or other midwestern states so it would follow that the per-capita expense would necessarily be higher even if the same percentage of residents were on assistance.

I'm not sure how to easily analyze the idea of which states are, in general, givers and takers, based on readily available data. It would be very easy to support any point of view just by picking slightly different variables.
 
2012-05-28 03:36:07 PM
atomic-age: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: As for taxation, lets see here. The poor most likely have negative taxation on both federal and state taxes. The poor do pay sales tax (also being cut under the new KS tax law by the way ). The poor, most likely, do not own property or if they do it's not very valuable and thusly does not incur a huge tax liability.

You have no sources and nothing to back up your claims. Do you really not understand the concept of a regressive system? (That's not a "label," that's the way it operates.)

Here, get some basic education on the matter

Done with you.

The label comment was meant for your assertion that everything I've said was simply "conservative talking points".

I know perfectly well what a regressive tax system is and how it works. Your argument doesn't hold water, however, since those in question pay little or nothing into the system at all in the first place.

So do you think that everyone who gets the EITC one year gets it forever?


If they no longer qualify for EITC then they're making more money and not so poor anymore are they? That makes your whole argument moot.
 
2012-05-28 03:38:23 PM
Niii do you have a walk in gunsafe?

Do you keep farm animals on the property as "pets" ???
 
2012-05-28 03:39:12 PM
TheNewJesus: Dude are you high? ONE COUNTY (and I know the one you are thinking of) has "quality schools" and that is out of 105 counties. And that ONE COUNTY voted years ago to take on an additional tax burden to make up for cuts.

That was tried and denied years ago. The state formula was fixed - effectively screwing Johnson county. The extra funding you are talking about was limited in what it could go toward. So athletics and extracurriculars could be continued, the class sizes have been growing and growing. The 'Local Budget Option' provides only so much flexibility. I think the local option is capped at 31% and it already costs a lot more per-student to educate in JoCo because salaries, maintenance, and transportation costs are higher due to the suburban standard of living. You can get a teacher in a rural community for $30k, you are unlikely to find the same in the wealthy suburb unless you pay $45k.
 
2012-05-28 03:39:54 PM
TheNewJesus: Niii do you have a walk in gunsafe?

Do you keep farm animals on the property as "pets" ???


More likely as brides.
 
2012-05-28 03:40:40 PM
yeah! Screw you Kansas! You should run your state like California or illinois. now THOSE are some states which have it going on financially...
 
2012-05-28 03:40:55 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: X-boxershorts: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Favorite me you ignorant fuq. Strawman du jour fake conservatard bullshiat echo chamber. Illegal immigration has been with us for the duration of this nation asswipe. It's only an issue now because the economy sucks and assholes like you stand between recovery and continuing to wallow in our own shiat.

Your ignorance makes me sick. Your willingness to echo Koch funded glibertarian think tank slogans and ignore very real, very public data shows me the shallowness of your thought process.

I thoroughly despise all that you stand for. YOU GOT NUTHIN

A very well reasoned and thought out response. You must have been captain of your high school debate team.

It's as valid as the boogieman you pulled out of your ass you unAmerican piece of shiat.

This is too funny.


Your stated position is so offensive to me that civility should, of necessity, be tossed out the window.

Great tax breaks for the already well off are being compensated for by taking food from poor children, health care from single mothers and education from kids.

To me, this is indefensible.

I assure you, there is nothing funny at all about what Kansas is doing. And you, invoking a racist boogie man to deflect from real data showing how this sort of tax policy negatively affects other states that have taken this route, is an obscenity.

So, yes..civility be damned, I consider you a very unAmerican piece of shiat.
 
2012-05-28 03:44:16 PM
madgonad: TheNewJesus: Dude are you high? ONE COUNTY (and I know the one you are thinking of) has "quality schools" and that is out of 105 counties. And that ONE COUNTY voted years ago to take on an additional tax burden to make up for cuts.

That was tried and denied years ago. The state formula was fixed - effectively screwing Johnson county. The extra funding you are talking about was limited in what it could go toward. So athletics and extracurriculars could be continued, the class sizes have been growing and growing. The 'Local Budget Option' provides only so much flexibility. I think the local option is capped at 31% and it already costs a lot more per-student to educate in JoCo because salaries, maintenance, and transportation costs are higher due to the suburban standard of living. You can get a teacher in a rural community for $30k, you are unlikely to find the same in the wealthy suburb unless you pay $45k.


Yea I haven't really been following, But I was educated in the state of Kansas and from first hand experience I can tell you it sucked. I slept in class and was on the honor roll. The class before mine called a meeting with school staff and basically told staff to their faces that they had failed and did not prepare the students for college. The reaction varied from nonexistent to slight head nods... Pathetic.
 
2012-05-28 03:44:48 PM
You know, they go away if you don't reply to them.
 
2012-05-28 03:47:01 PM
o5iiawah: yeah! Screw you Kansas! You should run your state like California or illinois. now THOSE are some states which have it going on financially...

3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-05-28 03:48:59 PM
TheNewJesus: madgonad: TheNewJesus: Dude are you high? ONE COUNTY (and I know the one you are thinking of) has "quality schools" and that is out of 105 counties. And that ONE COUNTY voted years ago to take on an additional tax burden to make up for cuts.

That was tried and denied years ago. The state formula was fixed - effectively screwing Johnson county. The extra funding you are talking about was limited in what it could go toward. So athletics and extracurriculars could be continued, the class sizes have been growing and growing. The 'Local Budget Option' provides only so much flexibility. I think the local option is capped at 31% and it already costs a lot more per-student to educate in JoCo because salaries, maintenance, and transportation costs are higher due to the suburban standard of living. You can get a teacher in a rural community for $30k, you are unlikely to find the same in the wealthy suburb unless you pay $45k.

Yea I haven't really been following, But I was educated in the state of Kansas and from first hand experience I can tell you it sucked. I slept in class and was on the honor roll. The class before mine called a meeting with school staff and basically told staff to their faces that they had failed and did not prepare the students for college. The reaction varied from nonexistent to slight head nods... Pathetic.


I can sympathize. I was educated at a ghetto school in the south, and I emerged better prepared for college than the Kansas freshmen I encountered as a GTA.

That said, I think the average Kansas parent cares more about the schools than my classmates' parents did. Most of my classmates seem to have made something of themselves, either through the military or through college, despite the thoroughly shiatty school and their apathetic parents.
 
2012-05-28 03:50:26 PM
Fart_Machine: Kansas is just the lab rat for what the GOP wants to implement for the entire country.

And the gop just took Kansas and divided by Zero.
 
2012-05-28 03:51:15 PM
atomic-age: I blame the Kansas Democratic Party for a lot of this.

You have got to be kidding.

JoCo is mostly GOP. Remember, the growth of JoCo was originally based upon "right next to Kansas City, but no black people here so your kids will still be in all-white classrooms". Brown v Board was the engine behind the rapid growth of the communities/cities in Johnson county. Now that has changed a bit since the mid-90s, but that was reality for 30 years starting in the mid-60s.
 
2012-05-28 03:52:48 PM
slykens1: As to the link you provided, federal welfare spending per capita is interesting but isn't necessarily fair. The cost of care and living in New York is significantly higher than in Kansas or other midwestern states so it would follow that the per-capita expense would necessarily be higher even if the same percentage of residents were on assistance.

I'm not sure how to easily analyze the idea of which states are, in general, givers and takers, based on readily available data. It would be very easy to support any point of view just by picking slightly different variables.


Good point. I've been searching for an analysis of per capita costs versus federal welfare monies received and turned up short. But I have both sets of data and could whip it up I suppose. Having a hard time finding data on federal education monies per state though.
 
2012-05-28 03:53:38 PM
TheNewJesus: Yea I haven't really been following, But I was educated in the state of Kansas and from first hand experience I can tell you it sucked. I slept in class and was on the honor roll. The class before mine called a meeting with school staff and basically told staff to their faces that they had failed and did not prepare the students for college. The reaction varied from nonexistent to slight head nods... Pathetic.

Whoa. What school, if you don't mind sharing? I did my student-teaching at SM East in the mid-90s and it was kind of odd. One of the reasons I left the profession.
 
2012-05-28 03:54:07 PM
atomic-age: .

I can sympathize. I was educated at a ghetto school in the south, and I emerged better prepared for college than the Kansas freshmen I encountered as a GTA.

That said, I think the average Kansas parent cares more about the schools than my classmates' parents did. Most of my classmates seem to have made something of themselves, either through the military or through college, despite the thoroughly shiatty school and their apathetic parents.


I had a few of my former high school peers in community college classes the year after graduation. They dropped out during the first semester. Community college dropouts. I repeat, community college dropouts. I am one of the "smart ones" and here I am working on memorial day... I guess I could have been a mechanic, or a Marine... the campus ROTC did a good business... sadly
 
2012-05-28 03:54:16 PM
Captain_Sunshine: And how much federal revenue will be poured into Kansas to compensate for the loss of services from this idiocy?

Winner, winner, chcken dinner!

(On you.)
 
2012-05-28 03:55:43 PM
madgonad: TheNewJesus: Yea I haven't really been following, But I was educated in the state of Kansas and from first hand experience I can tell you it sucked. I slept in class and was on the honor roll. The class before mine called a meeting with school staff and basically told staff to their faces that they had failed and did not prepare the students for college. The reaction varied from nonexistent to slight head nods... Pathetic.

Whoa. What school, if you don't mind sharing? I did my student-teaching at SM East in the mid-90s and it was kind of odd. One of the reasons I left the profession.



Washington, KCK.
 
2012-05-28 03:57:17 PM
madgonad: atomic-age: I blame the Kansas Democratic Party for a lot of this.

You have got to be kidding.

JoCo is mostly GOP. Remember, the growth of JoCo was originally based upon "right next to Kansas City, but no black people here so your kids will still be in all-white classrooms". Brown v Board was the engine behind the rapid growth of the communities/cities in Johnson county. Now that has changed a bit since the mid-90s, but that was reality for 30 years starting in the mid-60s.


I'm not kidding. The KDP did NOTHING to support Tom Holland, to get his name and positions on issues out there. They just rolled over and played dead, and Sam Brownback took the governorship because his was the only name known.

If they don't even try, there's no way they'll ever win.
 
2012-05-28 03:57:35 PM
orclover: I have always wondered if Drew pays these guys to shiat all over these threads or if they do it for free. I guess we will never know.

/remember kids, getting banned is like a badge of honor here.


They get to start a 'blog about it and the others work together to manufacture outrage.

See, FOX News isn't passive medium....it teaches!

/brainwashes really.....
 
2012-05-28 03:57:52 PM
why do you people continually respond to tenpoundsofskookum?
 
2012-05-28 04:00:25 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: You know, they go away if you don't reply to them.
 
2012-05-28 04:06:42 PM
TheNewJesus: Washington, KCK.

That's an interesting school. It used to be rural, but the growth in western Wyandotte county (aka "the speedway") and the government consolidation did all kinds of crazy things. If you graduated recently the government had absolutely no excuse and I feel your pain. It might have something to do with attracting quality teachers. I don't know how well Washington could compete with JoCo when local costs were outstripping new funding. It is fairly remote and there probably aren't a lot of nearby pools of talent. Certainly no help from nearby Platte County, MO.
 
2012-05-28 04:10:03 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: If they earned $10,000 and had a tax bill of $350 but now they have a tax bill of $300. Do you still think their taxes went down by a half a percent? (hint: it did not).

But 14% sounds SO much better than 50 bucks, right?

Someone this targets now get a 100 dollar break. Doesn't sound as good as saying "their taxes went down 14%", when you consider the doctor just got (conservatively) a $4000 cut in taxes.

How does the percentage work when it drops to zero? They got a 100% reduction!

Also, are teachers exempt? They are professionals. I didn't see them listed.
 
2012-05-28 04:11:47 PM
Slaxl: Mentat: Walker: Nope. It's what happens when you have Republicans in charge and a batsh*t insane Governor who used to live in a building designated as a church in DC when he was a Senator, and washed a staffer's feet, because Jesus did that for his disciples.

And do you know what the best part is? They actually had to pull back on their original tax plan because of resistance from other Republicans in the legislature who were concerned about the potential revenue drop. That's right, this is the compromise plan.

This doesn't make sense, if they are concerned about any revenue drop it shows they're not complete imbeciles and it shows they're not deliberately trying to bankrupt the state, so why do this ludicrous measure which is still slightly imbecilic and will bankrupt the state?

Trying to understand the GOP is very difficult.


Isn't the understanding essentially listed in the Shock Doctrine? I believe it is the word "shock" and is part of the title. I could be wrong.
 
2012-05-28 04:12:23 PM
ultraholland: why do you people continually respond to tenpoundsofskookum?

Actually I noticed Sheriff of Brownback has taken up to white-knighting Kansas' derp.
 
2012-05-28 04:12:26 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: What was your tax refund last year? I suspect you're getting a "free ride" yourself.

How is my tax refund a free ride?

Was the amount of your refund greater than the amount you paid in federal taxes throughout the year? That would be a free ride. A lot of people fall into this category.


I thought I'd chime in here, as I live in a state that taxes the crap out of us, and my total tax burden is in the five figures, and more than many families make in the USA. That's after my deductions. So, my money heads out to Kansas too.

And I agree with the 'libs' on this one. Kansas should be growing its education if nothing else, if it wants to attract money, not cutting it in a tax deal.

What I'm expecting, however, is that Kansas comes knocking in Washington for canned pork next year.
 
2012-05-28 04:17:46 PM
Lando Lincoln: Well, let's think about this:

Poor people are too damn poor to pull up stakes and move elsewhere, so they'll take it in the ass just like the Kansas GOP wants them to.

Rich doctors will seriously consider moving to Kansas.

Nurses and other medical staff will say, "fark this shiat - I can get a job anywhere in the country" and move away.


One out of three ain't bad, I guess. Poor people will certainly stay in Kansas, I'll give you that. Doctors will not move to Kansas over this, however. If people thought like that there would be no doctors in NY, San Francisco, or other places with a high cost of living, plus Kansas only needs so many doctors. Unless there's a shortage of doctors in Kansas, which I doubt, any influx of MDs would lead to lower pay for all doctors in the state, which would defeat the whole purpose. Nurses won't move away from the state because most have roots in Kansas; it's their home and most of them have family there. Ultimately this changes little beyond bankrupting the state and wrecking its education system, but when everything falls apart the people hurt by it the most will continue blaming liberals and voting Republican because that's their 'team' and they are rock-stupid. This is the sort of thing where, if there was any chance that it would change anyone's mind about the whole Republican philosophy, it wouldn't have passed in the first place. It's proof that Kansas has passed a threshold; they have crossed the event horizon of derp and there is no saving them now.
 
2012-05-28 04:18:52 PM
atomic-age: I'm not kidding. The KDP did NOTHING to support Tom Holland, to get his name and positions on issues out there. They just rolled over and played dead, and Sam Brownback took the governorship because his was the only name known.

If they don't even try, there's no way they'll ever win.


The Kansas Democrats have precious little money. Brownback had massive money & name recognition. Dumping money on the last Gubernatorial race would have been foolish.
 
2012-05-28 04:21:39 PM
Can this really be true? If it is, Kansas has surpassed Oklahoma. Congratulations Kansas! You've just made Mississippi look sane. A couple of generations from now, Kansas children will hear tall tales about the days when people got third grade educations before going to work for the garment factory that moved in from China. Don't worry UNICEF will drop a bag of grain for you on days that the air pollution clears.
 
2012-05-28 04:29:52 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: TheBeastOfYuccaFlats: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: A lot of people fall into this category. People who qualify for the EITC fall into this category.

Your tactic is to accuse him of being poor? That's pretty funny.

Pathetic, but funny.

Who is accusing who of being poor? A lot of those same people make pretty decent incomes.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/how-do-i/how-do-i-know-if-i-m-eligibl e -for-earned-income-tax-credit.aspx

Explain to me which people in that list of qualifying filers are "making pretty decent incomes".

There are a lot more credits for taxpayers, especially those with children, than just EITC.

Which does not, at all, equate to your claim that they are getting a "free ride".

You really need to shut your mouth, as the only thing you're accomplishing at this point is digging further holes for yourself.

You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?


So you're saying that Kansas is the EITC state.
 
2012-05-28 04:32:42 PM
X-boxershorts: And you low tax fraudulent fake libertarians should just be forced to read ALL of the Federalist papers to find out how badly you're being lied to.

There really isn't anything libertarian about this new tax code. Even the libertarian Reason magazine published an article deriding the Republican obsession with small business, granted their article dealt more with loans and tax credits. I consider myself pretty fiscally libertarian and am against the way the tax code has more favorable rates for income typically earned by the wealthy. Make capital gains rates and ordinary income rates identical - with no consideration of long-term vs. short-term on gains. Where I part ways with democrats is I believe the rate should be lower because of differences in beliefs in the role of government. But yeah, we shouldn't be sucking up to businesses. I am just as wary of businesses than government, and when the two get together like this, it's sickening.
 
2012-05-28 04:35:49 PM
Slaxl: That's just ridiculous. How can the average common voter support this insanity?

/Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay of the new West?


The farmers don't have to pay state taxes, according to the article. But their hired help will.
 
2012-05-28 04:36:02 PM
madgonad: atomic-age: I'm not kidding. The KDP did NOTHING to support Tom Holland, to get his name and positions on issues out there. They just rolled over and played dead, and Sam Brownback took the governorship because his was the only name known.

If they don't even try, there's no way they'll ever win.

The Kansas Democrats have precious little money. Brownback had massive money & name recognition. Dumping money on the last Gubernatorial race would have been foolish.


So they sat on their hands and let the state be driven straight to hell by Brownback. I guess Tom Holland was their John Kerry and Brownback is Kansas' Bush. Question is, who the hell is going to be the Kansas Obama and fix all the shiat the state GOP has broken, nay, smashed to bits, shiat on, then set ablaze?
 
2012-05-28 04:39:44 PM
slykens1: The Why Not Guy: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Also, consider the heavy military presence in the state ( 3 major installations ) and I think we can call it a wash.

Donor states like California and New York have military bases as well, so how does this make Kansas less of a welfare state?

Why did the District of Columbia, clearly one of the most liberal places in the country, take in $5.55 in federal spending for every dollar of federal tax paid? (2005 - other years vary - 2004, the year of the famous chart above was $6.28)

What a bunch of welfare queens!!!

/statement may be true in several other contexts


Perhaps because DC is the hub for Federal Government jobs? It's also not a state.
 
2012-05-28 04:40:17 PM
proteus_b: HairBolus: One of the issues the leading up to Civil War was whether Kansas should be a free state or a slave state.

The Union victory decided this as "free".


You may want to brush up on your history a bit.


Are you being purposefully stupid or nitpicky?
Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas or the Border War, was a series of violent political confrontations involving anti-slavery Free-Staters and pro-slavery "Border Ruffian" elements, that took place in the Kansas Territory and the neighboring towns of Missouri between 1854 and 1861. At the heart of the conflict was the question of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free state or slave state. As such, Bleeding Kansas was a proxy war between Northerners and Southerners over the issue of slavery in the United States.
 
2012-05-28 04:40:37 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii:
You and others claim Kansas got a free ride and are "welfare queens" because they received more than they paid in. I claim that certain taxpayers get a free ride because they receive more than they pay in. Aside from scale, how are the 2 different?




They aren't. Kansas is as much of a welfare queen as Octomom lubricating her 1040 with EITC and child tax credits.

You're bums looking for a handout, and then getting offended when people mention that you're sitting there with your palm up.

/I probably paid more in federal taxes than your mom made all last year at that truck stop in Topeka.
 
2012-05-28 04:41:51 PM
At least we can all agree that MU sucks...
 
2012-05-28 04:42:23 PM
o5iiawah: yeah! Screw you Kansas! You should run your state like California or illinois. now THOSE are some states which have it going on financially...

Yeah we still have to pay for your sorry ass
 
2012-05-28 04:46:26 PM
The problem is that the most effective cogent arguments that i find against the Republicans are found in the comments of Fark, Reddit or Huffington Post. The Democratic National Committee cannot state its own case effectively, let alone point out the insanity of the republicans.
 
2012-05-28 04:50:55 PM
Esquire: The problem is that the most effective cogent arguments that i find against the Republicans are found in the comments of Fark, Reddit or Huffington Post. The Democratic National Committee cannot state its own case effectively, let alone point out the insanity of the republicans.

That's because liberal journalists have corporate masters too, and the DNC has to tone it down to get corporate campaign dollars.
 
2012-05-28 04:53:13 PM
Having self-important rich dicks try to take over your country is one thing. We all know people like the Kochs are arseholes and expect no less from from them.

... but that forty-something percent of the US population will vote for the politicians that only work on behalf of these plutocrats is FARKING INSANE!

Seriously USA, you deserve the misery that your idiot voters elect. If the people of Kansas want to turn their state into Saudi Arabia west, and are stupid enough to vote for it to happen, then fark em.
 
2012-05-28 04:53:24 PM
GAT_00: Income of professionals - such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and accountants - practicing in partnerships will be tax-free. In a law firm, for example, the partners will pay no tax, while the clerical staff will continue on the tax rolls.

This is a farking joke, right? Please?


BRB moving to start an accounting partnership in Topeka.

/seems like the 1 state where "not actually being an accountant" won't disqualify me from doing this
 
2012-05-28 05:00:14 PM
I just like how it is the right wing's reactionary, "states' rights" populism that will bring down the very concept of states rights. I mean, it's obvious the voters who support this crap don't realize eventually, the federal government will tighten the purse strings and enforce more top-down control on the states who slash their budgets and cut taxes, but that it's not obvious to the folks pumping cash into all these SuperPACs and reactionary state governments is astounding.

Kansas' fark-ups will lead to stuff like national education standards, universal healthcare, massive green energy subsidies and gay marriage when other states follow suit and are unable to keep the lights on and the roads paved. Just you wait and see.
 
2012-05-28 05:10:27 PM
GAT_00: adamgreeney: In 2 or 3 years we can point to a dystopian Kansas and show what GOP policies really lead to.

They'll just say it's all liberals fault.


Nah, they'll just say taxes on the rich weren't cut enough.
 
2012-05-28 05:10:36 PM
MrLint: tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

chart is stupid.

how can a state be republican or democrat? Did they declare their party affiliation? How?

I thought people are either republican or democrat?

Did you even read the words on the chart. It explains it right there.


Guys, guys. Tenpoundsofcheese is a retarded inbred from Kansas. It takes him a while to read things, and like forever to comprehend them. Give him time.

/stop picking on Tenpoundsofcheese!!
//oh what do I care, flambe the dumb sonofabiatch
 
2012-05-28 05:13:16 PM
This About That: Let's see, where would one find the richest and most influential anti-tax, anti-regulation, and anti-government folks? Wichita, maybe?

I fear you were too subtle.
 
2012-05-28 05:15:13 PM
fusillade762: GAT_00: adamgreeney: In 2 or 3 years we can point to a dystopian Kansas and show what GOP policies really lead to.

They'll just say it's all liberals fault.

Nah, they'll just say taxes on the rich weren't cut enough.


Come now, surely there's room for BOTH pitiful excuses here.
 
2012-05-28 05:28:50 PM
I wonder if Kris Kobach is adviser on this one too. He's the Secretary of State of Kansas and Tea Party's champion of immigration laws like SB 1070, adviser to Mitt, and etc.
 
2012-05-28 05:31:32 PM
Captain_Sunshine: And how much federal revenue will be poured into Kansas to compensate for the loss of services from this idiocy?

And then they can use the budget shortfall at the federal level to lobby for tax and service cuts too!

It's a win-win!
 
2012-05-28 05:32:09 PM
The poor better get out of Dodge.
 
2012-05-28 05:34:21 PM
Buzzerguy: This About That: Let's see, where would one find the richest and most influential anti-tax, anti-regulation, and anti-government folks? Wichita, maybe?

I fear you were too subtle.


Fantastic. Hey Kansas, every time a school program is canceled and class sizes increase, every time a library is closed, every time there are only 3 cops on shift, every time a firehouse is browned-out, every time a public pool is closed, every time you drive over a pothole or it takes a month to replace a burned out streetlight, remember you chose to have a crappier life in order to give these two dill weeds a tax break.
 
2012-05-28 05:35:43 PM
Good. Fewer public teachers means fewer child rapists on the government pay roll.
 
2012-05-28 05:39:31 PM
MyRandomName: Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot.

How well would New Hampshire be doing without all the people who work in Massachusetts and commute home to New Hampshire? Without Massachusetts, New Hampshire would be some dairy farms, autumn leaf-peeping tourism, and not much else. The outlet, liquor, and fireworks stores sell pretty much entirely to Massholes. Yes, New Hampshire is very libertarian, but its entire economy depends on being directly north of one of the most left-leaning states in the country.
 
2012-05-28 05:44:09 PM
imageshack.us
 
2012-05-28 05:45:44 PM
i560.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-28 05:46:25 PM
Our Governor will be president some day....maybe even Vice president. The GOP base will love him.
 
2012-05-28 05:53:51 PM
Notabunny: Buzzerguy: This About That: Let's see, where would one find the richest and most influential anti-tax, anti-regulation, and anti-government folks? Wichita, maybe?

I fear you were too subtle.

Fantastic. Hey Kansas, every time a school program is canceled and class sizes increase, every time a library is closed, every time there are only 3 cops on shift, every time a firehouse is browned-out, every time a public pool is closed, every time you drive over a pothole or it takes a month to replace a burned out streetlight, remember you chose to have a crappier life in order to give these two dill weeds a tax break.


Why would you need all those things when the government-relient people of Kansas will be moving to more "progressive" states?
 
2012-05-28 05:59:19 PM
It is the logical extension of a situation where you have states competing for business in a federation without sufficient central authority over matters of taxation and regulation. Sooner or later a state will go insane and try to literally give money to businesses to come there. Its completely unsustainable of course. If the repubs get their way and can the EPA, Fed etc then states like this will also remove all environmental regulations, Financial regulation etc.

Well done.
 
2012-05-28 05:59:20 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Salt Lick Steady: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Once again, explain to me how a state receiving more in government money than it paid in makes it any more of a welfare queen than an individual who receives more than they pay in.

Because nobody is arguing that certain individuals receive more federal money than they pay in taxes. Nobody is arguing that point.

You really don't understand the concept of individual versus aggregate? Comparisons of populations as whole versus individuals?

You really don't seem to understand that the idea is to point out just exactly how silly it is to label someone...........or some population........... a "welfare queen" or any other such thing when they are not.


OK then Niii. I have read a whole bunch of this nonsense, and I have a question for you: where are your limits then? If receiving $1.12 for every $1.00 you pay in isn't welfare queen status, what is? Does it start at $1.35:$1:00 (basically South Carolina)? $1.50:$1.00 (Virginia and Kentucky)? How much more than you pay out do you have to receive before you can be called a welfare queen in your world?

/seriously want to know
//my state gets back less than $0.90:$1.00
///tired of paying for your shiat
 
2012-05-28 06:01:02 PM
i86.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-28 06:07:07 PM
MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

You made it through ALL those posts without realizing Kansas still has income tax, just on the lower class?

How did you miss that?
 
2012-05-28 06:08:57 PM
Bigdogdaddy: Our Governor will be president some day....maybe even Vice president. The GOP base will love him.

I agree; I'd be surprised if he didn't take a shot at the GOP nomination in 2016.
 
2012-05-28 06:11:35 PM
Equally important, the act dramatically changes the Kansas tax system, shifting the income tax burden from the wealthy and prosperous to working people


hell, that's status quo ever since ronnie raygun began licking wealthy ass back in the 80's and doing everything they demanded of him. what we're seeing now in the American ClusterF*ck has its roots in the 80's.

Kansas is just catching up.
 
2012-05-28 06:14:09 PM
Confabulat: I WANT to pay higher taxes just to piss off Republicans. Screw you, Wal-Mart, I'd rather give it to a silly gopher tortoise study in Indiantown than another pillow or clock or whatever you morans try to sell people.


Walmart: We exploit cheap communist chinese labor so you don't have to!!
 
2012-05-28 06:16:10 PM
Matt Jones Dashboard: Kansas: If you're not a wealthy Christian, then fark you.


yea, Jesus always did have a soft spot for the wealthy.
 
2012-05-28 06:18:38 PM
Bend over the other 99% of Kansas, you are about to get another red white and blue cock up your ass. cept this one is fatter and longer than the last. and little/no lube either.


ain't Freedom great!
 
2012-05-28 06:20:17 PM
LargeCanine: Reduce gov't revenues and cut taxes. Awesome. Plus I know a girl there. Just might move to Kansas.

if you move to Kansas YOU'LL be the girl. and when you bend over think about what i told you.
 
2012-05-28 06:21:54 PM
The real joke here is that this writer claims to be an "economist"

Actually, the best way to raise taxes is from sales taxes. It is the only way to get the old money super-rich (who live only off of interest income and not direct wealth) to pay any taxes. In an income tax system, the newly wealthy are always punished more than the old money...because their overall wealth is more likely to be taxed than old money (which is why the old money crowd pushes free trade and income taxes instead of tariffs and sales taxes
 
2012-05-28 06:26:32 PM
tenpoundsofcheese:
If a person's tax rate goes down from 3.5% to 3% that is not a decrease in their taxes of a half a percent.

If they earned $10,000 and had a tax bill of $350 but now they have a tax bill of $300. Do you still think their taxes went down by a half a percent? (hint: it did not).


Yeah, except:

State figures show that a married couple filing jointly with one child and federal adjusted gross income of about $65,000 a year would save $572 a year in taxes.

Meanwhile, a single person with a federal adjusted gross income of $17,600 a year would only see a tax savings of $27.

...the tax plan, which begins at the start of 2013, eliminates a number of tax credits that benefit low-income residents.

The plan, for example, eliminates tax credits for almost 72,000 taxpayers who have to work and must care for children, disabled dependents and spouses.

It also eliminates food sales tax rebates for more than 365,000 Kansans and credits for adoption expenses for 1,300 other taxpayers.


So you can save $27 on your state income taxes, except you won't because you'll actually be taxed on a higher income by losing major deductions.

And, of course, cities will be raising sales taxes, property taxes, and various fees to make up for the massive reduction in state funds they receive. An increase in the fees on the toll highways is probably a given. And if not, letting the roads fall into a worse state of repair I'm sure won't cost anyone more in maintenance or repair costs on their vehicles. And the police forces will move even more to a system of "write enough in tickets to cover your salary."

Pretending that the actual tax burden of less affluent citizens will go down ANY percent with this plan is a joke. Their costs will go up considerably, and they'll get a signification reduction in services in return. But, for the most part, they voted for these clowns, so they've earned the coming mess.

/ Watching Republican infighting in this state is a blast.
// Johnson County is going to lose their collective shiat over education funding. The districts have cut to the bone, and maxed out their allowable local option budgets.
 
2012-05-28 06:45:07 PM
downpaymentblues: You made it through ALL those posts without realizing Kansas still has income tax, just on the lower class? How did you miss that?

He didn't miss it, he just thinks that poor people don't count as people.

/Just being sarcastic, but I'm probably right.
 
2012-05-28 06:49:38 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: downpaymentblues: You made it through ALL those posts without realizing Kansas still has income tax, just on the lower class? How did you miss that?

He didn't miss it, he just thinks that poor people don't count as people.

/Just being sarcastic, but I'm probably right.


Leona Helmsley was right prescient.
 
2012-05-28 06:50:03 PM
gaspode: It is the logical extension of a situation where you have states competing for business in a federation without sufficient central authority over matters of taxation and regulation. Sooner or later a state will go insane and try to literally give money to businesses to come there. Its completely unsustainable of course. If the repubs get their way and can the EPA, Fed etc then states like this will also remove all environmental regulations, Financial regulation etc.

Well done.


You say that like it's a bad thing. Restoring this country to its foundational principles is nothing but good.
 
2012-05-28 07:03:22 PM
gimmegimme: Let's not be so hasty, folks. Now the job creators will flock to Kansas!

Just like they did to California after Prop 13 passed.

Oh wait, no they didn't.
 
2012-05-28 07:04:29 PM
There is no state easier to leave than Kansas, so I don't understand this concern for poor trapped government reliant folk. Massachusetts is begging for more government reliant types to join their progressive state. Surely they can scrape together the money for a bus ticket.

The federal government should take over their toll roads, though. If that ain't a bunch a shiat. I can drive from Laredo, Texas to Duluth, Minnesota on I35 but I gotta pay only the state of Kansas to drive their stretch of it? That couldn't possibly have been the intention of the interstate system.
 
2012-05-28 07:04:49 PM
you know, i'm actually all for this. let the rest of the country see how this works out, and maybe Reel Murkins' will wake up.

/hey, I said maybe...
 
2012-05-28 07:05:35 PM
If the U.S. insists on experimenting with this kind of asstardedness, it might as well be in Kansas.

/Canadian
//Enjoying my popcorn
 
2012-05-28 07:08:54 PM
Any chance a mega-tornado could go through Kansas and suck up all of the trash so we can start over again?
 
2012-05-28 07:10:05 PM
Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.
 
2012-05-28 07:11:29 PM
Is there a way the Kansas City suburbs and Lawrence can secede from Kansas and form it's own state?

All the idiocy seems to be coming from around Wichita.
 
2012-05-28 07:13:44 PM
Sounds a bit like hyper progressive California. Shelter the wealthy(who benefit the most from things like trusts and such for property tax purposes), tax the poor hard(highest tax bracket is in the mid 40ks, and the brackets start only ~20k lower), rape the schools(hundreds of millions to billions cut from education every year for the past 5+ at least), etc.
 
2012-05-28 07:13:48 PM
Baz744: gaspode: You say that like it's a bad thing. Restoring this country to its foundational principles is nothing but good.

www.phawker.com
i893.photobucket.com
Uhm, ok.....

Can we all just skip to the part where we start killing each other now? I think we have pretty good odds and I'm sick of the waiting.
 
2012-05-28 07:17:36 PM
neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.


And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP
 
2012-05-28 07:21:01 PM
Kansas, like Wisconsin, is getting exactly the government they voted for. Fark em. Let them enjoy the repercussions of their votes I say.
 
2012-05-28 07:31:30 PM
I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this because they passed a bill that they thought was too extreme for the conservatives in the House to sign on to, expecting to embarrass the House and governor, and the House went ahead and passed it. Now the libs are biatching and moaning about their own bill and the libs are refusing to close the loopholes.
 
2012-05-28 07:32:22 PM
bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP


It's a bipartisan thing. California's proposition system is what farked you guys over.

It had good intentions but you forget that people (on the left and right) are greedy, selfish assholes who always want stuff but don't want to pay for it.
 
2012-05-28 07:33:07 PM
Baz744: gaspode: It is the logical extension of a situation where you have states competing for business in a federation without sufficient central authority over matters of taxation and regulation. Sooner or later a state will go insane and try to literally give money to businesses to come there. Its completely unsustainable of course. If the repubs get their way and can the EPA, Fed etc then states like this will also remove all environmental regulations, Financial regulation etc.

Well done.

You say that like it's a bad thing. Restoring this country to its foundational principles is nothing but good.



Yes the glorious roots of the USA. Exploit slavery in order to compete on the world market and make a few richer off the backs of the masses. Exploit natural resources for the benefit of a few, fairly understandable at the time, as the preeminent scientist of the time was still flying a kite in a thunderstorm.

Yes glorious old USA. So much more enlightened than the current USA. So much better, actually no, no it wasn't. As a country we are so very much better than we were in the past. People forget where this country from, they like to think life was easier then. It simply was not. The roots of this country are ugly, nasty and difficult, there is very little to celebrate other than a document that took over 150 years to actually make an impact on society.

Your foundation and roots while providing a starting point are a joke compared the current USA, a much, much better country than the old USA.

/Current USA needs a lot of work too
//Old USA sucked, sucked a lot, embarrassingly sucked
///Just don't trip on your own decentralized government rhetoric on your way down to feudalism (no country lasts long with a weak centralized government, that is the lesson from history)
 
2012-05-28 07:33:18 PM
bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP


We make enough to subsidize Kansas derponomics?
 
2012-05-28 07:34:05 PM
Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this because they passed a bill that they thought was too extreme for the conservatives in the House to sign on to, expecting to embarrass the House and governor, and the House went ahead and passed it. Now the libs are biatching and moaning about their own bill and the libs are refusing to close the loopholes.

Funny'd
 
2012-05-28 07:35:15 PM
BigBurrito: Baz744: gaspode: It is the logical extension of a situation where you have states competing for business in a federation without sufficient central authority over matters of taxation and regulation. Sooner or later a state will go insane and try to literally give money to businesses to come there. Its completely unsustainable of course. If the repubs get their way and can the EPA, Fed etc then states like this will also remove all environmental regulations, Financial regulation etc.

Well done.

You say that like it's a bad thing. Restoring this country to its foundational principles is nothing but good.


Yes the glorious roots of the USA. Exploit slavery in order to compete on the world market and make a few richer off the backs of the masses. Exploit natural resources for the benefit of a few, fairly understandable at the time, as the preeminent scientist of the time was still flying a kite in a thunderstorm.

Yes glorious old USA. So much more enlightened than the current USA. So much better, actually no, no it wasn't. As a country we are so very much better than we were in the past. People forget where this country from, they like to think life was easier then. It simply was not. The roots of this country are ugly, nasty and difficult, there is very little to celebrate other than a document that took over 150 years to actually make an impact on society.

Your foundation and roots while providing a starting point are a joke compared the current USA, a much, much better country than the old USA.

/Current USA needs a lot of work too
//Old USA sucked, sucked a lot, embarrassingly sucked
///Just don't trip on your own decentralized government rhetoric on your way down to feudalism (no country lasts long with a weak centralized government, that is the lesson from history)


Clearly the same laws that existed in 1776 are applicable in 2012.
 
2012-05-28 07:37:57 PM
WhoIsNotInMyKitchen: Having self-important rich dicks try to take over your country is one thing. We all know people like the Kochs are arseholes and expect no less from from them.

... but that forty-something percent of the US population will vote for the politicians that only work on behalf of these plutocrats is FARKING INSANE!

Seriously USA, you deserve the misery that your idiot voters elect. If the people of Kansas want to turn their state into Saudi Arabia west, and are stupid enough to vote for it to happen, then fark em.


*Sigh* You're right. People ultimately get the government they deserve -- and in a democracy it happens faster.
 
2012-05-28 07:38:40 PM
Mrtraveler01: bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP

It's a bipartisan thing. California's proposition system is what farked you guys over.

It had good intentions but you forget that people (on the left and right) are greedy, selfish assholes who always want stuff but don't want to pay for it.


Which is to say that it's not what the GOP wants to do to America, it's what the common person wants to do to America.
 
2012-05-28 07:41:52 PM
bhcompy: Mrtraveler01: bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP

It's a bipartisan thing. California's proposition system is what farked you guys over.

It had good intentions but you forget that people (on the left and right) are greedy, selfish assholes who always want stuff but don't want to pay for it.

Which is to say that it's not what the GOP wants to do to America, it's what the common person wants to do to America.


I think the GOP should be included as well.

These are the same folks who whine about SS, Medicare, and Medicaid being riddled with waste and fraud but yet ignore the fact the Defense department does the same exact thing.

And to add to the absurdity of it, the GOP goes out of it's way to defend these programs riddled with waste and fraud and fight with all of their might to prevent a budget cut for defense by even $1.
 
2012-05-28 07:43:03 PM
And we still call these people conservatives? They're not conservative, they're clearly working towards the demise of the state via thoroughly impaired judgement. That's anything but conservative. At this point in time, that's just unbalanced, retarded (literal meaning) thinking.

Hence, we shouldn't call these people conservatives, we should call them retarded.
 
2012-05-28 07:46:18 PM
Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this because they passed a bill that they thought was too extreme for the conservatives in the House to sign on to, expecting to embarrass the House and governor, and the House went ahead and passed it. Now the libs are biatching and moaning about their own bill and the libs are refusing to close the loopholes.

you solved the case! It was those darn line all along. This is an intellectual Republican
 
2012-05-28 07:58:18 PM
slykens1: Why did the District of Columbia, clearly one of the most liberal places in the country, take in $5.55 in federal spending for every dollar of federal tax paid? (2005 - other years vary - 2004, the year of the famous chart above was $6.28)

What a bunch of welfare queens!!!


There are 535 people in D.C. getting well over $100,000 a year from the federal government, plus all sorts of other nice benefits. And get this--they actually get "recess" like they were still in school or something. I say we cut them loose and send them back where they came from!
 
2012-05-28 07:58:55 PM
John Paul Jones: And we still call these people conservatives? They're not conservative, they're clearly working towards the demise of the state via thoroughly impaired judgement. That's anything but conservative. At this point in time, that's just unbalanced, retarded (literal meaning) thinking.

Hence, we shouldn't call these people conservatives, we should call them retarded.


It's every liberal Democrat in the Kansas senate who refuses to eliminate the loopholes that you are all worked up about. The conservatives want to moderate the law.
 
2012-05-28 07:59:18 PM
Mrtraveler01: I think the GOP should be included as well.

These are the same folks who whine about SS, Medicare, and Medicaid being riddled with waste and fraud but yet ignore the fact the Defense department does the same exact thing.

And to add to the absurdity of it, the GOP goes out of it's way to defend these programs riddled with waste and fraud and fight with all of their might to prevent a budget cut for defense by even $1.


Sure, but the rank and file Democrats says the same thing about the exact opposite. Ouroboros
 
2012-05-28 08:02:41 PM
Noam Chimpsky: John Paul Jones: And we still call these people conservatives? They're not conservative, they're clearly working towards the demise of the state via thoroughly impaired judgement. That's anything but conservative. At this point in time, that's just unbalanced, retarded (literal meaning) thinking.

Hence, we shouldn't call these people conservatives, we should call them retarded.

It's every liberal Democrat in the Kansas senate who refuses to eliminate the loopholes that you are all worked up about. The conservatives want to moderate the law.


I'm going to need to you to name all these liberal Democrats in the Kansas Senate.

Shouldn't take long.
 
2012-05-28 08:12:26 PM
Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this because they passed a bill that they thought was too extreme for the conservatives in the House to sign on to, expecting to embarrass the House and governor, and the House went ahead and passed it. Now the libs are biatching and moaning about their own bill and the libs are refusing to close the loopholes.

There are eight Democrats in the Kansas Senate...and 32 Republicans.

But, yeah, don't let facts get in your way. They're "liberal." I'm sure that 20% has an awful lot of power.
 
2012-05-28 08:13:30 PM
atomic-age: Noam Chimpsky: John Paul Jones: And we still call these people conservatives? They're not conservative, they're clearly working towards the demise of the state via thoroughly impaired judgement. That's anything but conservative. At this point in time, that's just unbalanced, retarded (literal meaning) thinking.

Hence, we shouldn't call these people conservatives, we should call them retarded.

It's every liberal Democrat in the Kansas senate who refuses to eliminate the loopholes that you are all worked up about. The conservatives want to moderate the law.

I'm going to need to you to name all these liberal Democrats in the Kansas Senate.

Shouldn't take long.


How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.
 
2012-05-28 08:16:12 PM
Wow, just wow. What the farking hell is the matter with Kansas!?
 
2012-05-28 08:21:12 PM
Noam Chimpsky: How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.

Sigh.

imgs.xkcd.com

Please, do list all these Democrats that are all about furthering the established GOP agenda. For fark's sake, this is the GOP utopia.
 
2012-05-28 08:24:45 PM
bhcompy: Sure, but the rank and file Democrats says the same thing about the exact opposite. Ouroboros

That's why the fraud convictions have increased substantially under the AHA. Because, status quo?
 
2012-05-28 08:26:19 PM
Noam Chimpsky: How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.

Since this is FARK, I can't tell if you are a joke account or actually believe what you are saying. Either way, it is sad.

Such is the politics tab.
 
2012-05-28 08:26:54 PM
Pretty soon Kansans will be fleeing to Mexico for better opportunities.
 
2012-05-28 08:41:25 PM
bhcompy: Sure, but the rank and file Democrats says the same thing about the exact opposite.

Both sides are bad, you say? What should one do in this situation?
 
2012-05-28 08:42:01 PM
heavymetal: Pretty soon Kansans will be fleeing to Mexico for better opportunities.

Fark 'em. Put a fence around the state and let them live out their libertarian dream. After all, they asked for it.
 
2012-05-28 08:42:08 PM
Noam Chimpsky: atomic-age: Noam Chimpsky: John Paul Jones: And we still call these people conservatives? They're not conservative, they're clearly working towards the demise of the state via thoroughly impaired judgement. That's anything but conservative. At this point in time, that's just unbalanced, retarded (literal meaning) thinking.

Hence, we shouldn't call these people conservatives, we should call them retarded.

It's every liberal Democrat in the Kansas senate who refuses to eliminate the loopholes that you are all worked up about. The conservatives want to moderate the law.

I'm going to need to you to name all these liberal Democrats in the Kansas Senate.

Shouldn't take long.

How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.


So what you are saying is that you're full of shiat.
 
2012-05-28 08:42:26 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: bhcompy: Sure, but the rank and file Democrats says the same thing about the exact opposite.

Both sides are bad, you say? What should one do in this situation?


I'd say use the initiative system, but that was the base complaint already.
 
2012-05-28 08:42:55 PM
Fluorescent Testicle: bhcompy: Sure, but the rank and file Democrats says the same thing about the exact opposite.

Both sides are bad, you say? What should one do in this situation?


I know, I know! Call on my, teacher! I know the answer!
 
2012-05-28 08:48:14 PM
downpaymentblues: MyRandomName: Lol. Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot. Are you liberals truly this idiotic?

You made it through ALL those posts without realizing Kansas still has income tax, just on the lower class?

How did you miss that?


He's a notable moron.
 
2012-05-28 08:52:59 PM
pciszek: MyRandomName: Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot.

How well would New Hampshire be doing without all the people who work in Massachusetts and commute home to New Hampshire? Without Massachusetts, New Hampshire would be some dairy farms, autumn leaf-peeping tourism, and not much else. The outlet, liquor, and fireworks stores sell pretty much entirely to Massholes. Yes, New Hampshire is very libertarian, but its entire economy depends on being directly north of one of the most left-leaning states in the country.


I've never bit on a troll before, but holy fark - do you believe this yourself? Personally I work with a large number of massholes who drive to NH every day to work, and we certainly aren't in the masshole tourist business. Add in the fact that the majority of what massholes do provide financially to the state is in the northern 2/3s (poor, low populated mountainous area) when they go camping / skiiing / boating /etc - not exactly a crapload of money.

NH has no personal income tax (does have some capital gain income taxes), but has very high property taxes. This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it? Property tax is a very progressive tax; the poorest don't pay it at all (except indirectly, through marginally higher rents, but apartment complexes typically get property tax breaks).I don't mind paying a high property tax if we see direct benefits in the schools and public services - which we do. It's certainly not perfect - you can argue it keeps lower income families from home ownership at all, but I think the crazy home prices in the 'civilized' part of the state prevents that anyways.

NH has the highest per capita income in the country - things are going quite well. We have a large base of high paying, high skill jobs (some of which, to be fair, have moved out of lovely MA). Anyways, if NH is just leaning on MA for all it's success, whats the deal with Rhode Island? They should be living the high life as well, right? Are all the high paying jobs that NH residents have in MA? 90% of them? Try Google, you might learn something.

MA has some great things going for it - geographically Boston, Berkshires and the Cape, and a good base of high-tech companies - no doubt about it, and lots of cool people and places. But many / most people in New England avoid the rest of MA because of how bad the bad parts are (Let's go to Worcester!!!! The South Shore!!!! Dorchester!!!). Of course if you ask any given person from Mass, they are always 'from Boston', because they don't want to own up to their real shiathole of a hometown that's a long ways (in a lot of ways) from Boston.

\ You should probably pick on another state; we're doing way better than yours
\\ Assuming you are from MA - you really sound like someone who just went to college there.
\\\ Most MA residents I know would prefer to live on the other side of the border.
 
2012-05-28 09:01:51 PM
zimmerman: pciszek: MyRandomName: Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot.

How well would New Hampshire be doing without all the people who work in Massachusetts and commute home to New Hampshire? Without Massachusetts, New Hampshire would be some dairy farms, autumn leaf-peeping tourism, and not much else. The outlet, liquor, and fireworks stores sell pretty much entirely to Massholes. Yes, New Hampshire is very libertarian, but its entire economy depends on being directly north of one of the most left-leaning states in the country.

I've never bit on a troll before, but holy fark - do you believe this yourself? Personally I work with a large number of massholes who drive to NH every day to work, and we certainly aren't in the masshole tourist business. Add in the fact that the majority of what massholes do provide financially to the state is in the northern 2/3s (poor, low populated mountainous area) when they go camping / skiiing / boating /etc - not exactly a crapload of money.

NH has no personal income tax (does have some capital gain income taxes), but has very high property taxes. This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it? Property tax is a very progressive tax; the poorest don't pay it at all (except indirectly, through marginally higher rents, but apartment complexes typically get property tax breaks).I don't mind paying a high property tax if we see direct benefits in the schools and public services - which we do. It's certainly not perfect - you can argue it keeps lower income families from home ownership at all, but I think the crazy home prices in the 'civilized' part of the state prevents that anyways.

NH has the highest per capita income in the country - things are going quite well. We have a large base of high paying, high skill jobs (some of which, to b ...


Nevada has no personal income tax...but they make up for it with everything they get from gaming.
 
2012-05-28 09:09:21 PM
LouDobbsAwaaaay: Mods are being shiat stains. I see a particular troll (who apparently I am not allowed to name without a form of repercussion I also am not allowed to name) has a very elite, protected status.

This really explains a lot about the Politics tab. It's not really about discussion/debate at all anymore. Welcome to Fark, I know, but honestly it didn't used to be like this. Used to be the trolls were filtered out over time, banned or encouraged to bring real arguments to the table and it worked to encourage relatively civil and intelligent discourse. These days it really seems like it's the opposite, the most disingenious people are the ones who are welcomed and protected here. Bizarro Fark.
 
2012-05-28 09:09:35 PM
X-boxershorts: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: I actually can almost respect this. Unlike most, at least THESE Republicans don't even try and pretend they give a shiat about anyone except the rich and big businesses.

yeah, cutting the lowest tax rate for individuals from 3.5% to 3% is BAD for the poor.

Also lowering the state sales tax is bad for the poor.

bad, bad, bad.

That all you got? Massive cuts to social services to pay for completely eliminating taxes for the rich are OK because the poor had their taxes cut by one half of one percent?

what? a cut from 3.5% to 3% means their taxes were cut by about a 14 percent.

You're living up to your reputation as one of the dumbest trolls on Fark.

and you are living up to your reputation here as someone who has no clue of what is going on.

Oh, we know what's going on, we're just scratching our heads and trying to figure out why so many people are rejecting the concept of the "Public Commons" and selectively quoting "founding fathers" in doing so while ignoring the reality that "The Public Commons" was one of the founding principles behind the events that led up to the declaration of independence and the war against Britain.

If you think that what Kansas is doing here will benefit Kansans, just consider the 25 BILLION dollar budget shortfall that Texas is facing. The very low standards of health care in Texas. The extreme degredation of air quality in Texas, especially in and around Houston and Dallas.

Texas Air quality comparison: Link

Texas health care: Link

Texas Poverty: Link

Texas education: Link

Record numbers of Texans on Food Stamps: Link

Kansas will parallel Texas.

And you low tax fraudulent fake libertarians should just be forced to read ALL of the Federalist papers to find out how badly you're being lied to.

The Federalist Papers from the Library of Congress. ALL of them

God save us from these ignorant farking morons.


Don't forget Texas has the 4th highest teen pregnancy rate: Link
 
2012-05-28 09:09:37 PM
zimmerman: pciszek: MyRandomName: Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot.

How well would New Hampshire be doing without all the people who work in Massachusetts and commute home to New Hampshire? Without Massachusetts, New Hampshire would be some dairy farms, autumn leaf-peeping tourism, and not much else. The outlet, liquor, and fireworks stores sell pretty much entirely to Massholes. Yes, New Hampshire is very libertarian, but its entire economy depends on being directly north of one of the most left-leaning states in the country.

I've never bit on a troll before, but holy fark - do you believe this yourself? Personally I work with a large number of massholes who drive to NH every day to work, and we certainly aren't in the masshole tourist business. Add in the fact that the majority of what massholes do provide financially to the state is in the northern 2/3s (poor, low populated mountainous area) when they go camping / skiiing / boating /etc - not exactly a crapload of money.

NH has no personal income tax (does have some capital gain income taxes), but has very high property taxes. This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it? Property tax is a very progressive tax; the poorest don't pay it at all (except indirectly, through marginally higher rents, but apartment complexes typically get property tax breaks).I don't mind paying a high property tax if we see direct benefits in the schools and public services - which we do. It's certainly not perfect - you can argue it keeps lower income families from home ownership at all, but I think the crazy home prices in the 'civilized' part of the state prevents that anyways.

NH has the highest per capita income in the country - things are going quite well. We have a large base of high paying, high skill jobs (some of which, to b ...


THIS.
 
2012-05-28 09:14:10 PM
strapp3r: farm folk kin be dum

[blacktable.com image 350x200]


Why do you think we have to pay them not to grow on all their land?

/Hint: "dust bowl"
 
2012-05-28 09:25:21 PM
John Paul Jones: zimmerman: pciszek: MyRandomName: Made it through 50 posts of dumb liberal posts, none realizing that there is already a state without any income tax, and doing pretty well to boot.

How well would New Hampshire be doing without all the people who work in Massachusetts and commute home to New Hampshire? Without Massachusetts, New Hampshire would be some dairy farms, autumn leaf-peeping tourism, and not much else. The outlet, liquor, and fireworks stores sell pretty much entirely to Massholes. Yes, New Hampshire is very libertarian, but its entire economy depends on being directly north of one of the most left-leaning states in the country.

I've never bit on a troll before, but holy fark - do you believe this yourself? Personally I work with a large number of massholes who drive to NH every day to work, and we certainly aren't in the masshole tourist business. Add in the fact that the majority of what massholes do provide financially to the state is in the northern 2/3s (poor, low populated mountainous area) when they go camping / skiiing / boating /etc - not exactly a crapload of money.

NH has no personal income tax (does have some capital gain income taxes), but has very high property taxes. This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it? Property tax is a very progressive tax; the poorest don't pay it at all (except indirectly, through marginally higher rents, but apartment complexes typically get property tax breaks).I don't mind paying a high property tax if we see direct benefits in the schools and public services - which we do. It's certainly not perfect - you can argue it keeps lower income families from home ownership at all, but I think the crazy home prices in the 'civilized' part of the state prevents that anyways.

NH has the highest per capita income in the country - things are going quite well. We have a large base of high paying, high skill jobs (some of ...


Apples and oranges. Kansas didn't abolish their personal income tax. They just removed it for the rich. If Kansas had just abolished their income tax entirely, you wouldn't see this kind of kerfluffle. Instead, they just demonstrated that they really, really want businesses to move to Kansas, but they just can't cancel the income tax because they do need some form of income - so they just settled the burden on the shoulders of employees and retirees, even as they cut the benefits those same citizens require. Y'know, to pay for this huge tax cut for businesses and the wealthy.
 
2012-05-28 09:31:06 PM
A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?
 
2012-05-28 09:31:14 PM
No, no, no! You are supposed to introduce land value taxation before you dismantle income taxes.
 
2012-05-28 09:46:28 PM
tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: gimmegimme: tenpoundsofcheese: Goodfella: Rich pay no taxes while middle class and poor likely pay higher taxes

the tax rate for the poor went down from 3.5% to 3% and the sales tax went down.

Try again.

While you're looking at the information, did the people who voted for this bill offer to take a pay cut?

I don't know.
Did 0bama offer to take a pay cut after passing his tax cuts last year?

Well, President Obama is not trying to cripple the economy and decimate the middle and lower classes in favor of the Republican Party.

okay. no one is.

how is giving lowering the tax rates to the poor AND lowering sales tax decimating the middle and lower classes?
please show your work.


Because the state services they recieved will be gutted and to make up for it they will have to do without or pay more than what they saved in taxes to a private party for the same or inferior service. Education, roads, etc.
 
2012-05-28 09:52:16 PM
skullkrusher: A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?

FTFY
 
2012-05-28 09:57:23 PM
Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this.

According to Wikipedia, 32 of the 40 current Kansas State Senators are Republicans.
 
2012-05-28 10:01:02 PM
downpaymentblues: Noam Chimpsky: How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.

Since this is FARK, I can't tell if you are a joke account or actually believe what you are saying.


How do you know that you don't agree with the Democrats' reason for refusing to remove the loopholes? Their intention was liberal; they thought they could kill the whole bill. What they managed to do, despite their small numbers and lack of influence, is destroy their rino allies who will be sent packing soon enough.
 
2012-05-28 10:04:00 PM
Nuclear Monk: skullkrusher: A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?

FTFY


hehe also a valid question though I suppose people of lesser means don't always have the ability to GTFO
 
2012-05-28 10:08:09 PM
Sounds like we need to clean Kansas out again. Sorta like my ancestors did during the war of northern aggression.
 
2012-05-28 10:08:57 PM
Noam Chimpsky: downpaymentblues: Noam Chimpsky: How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.

Since this is FARK, I can't tell if you are a joke account or actually believe what you are saying.

How do you know that you don't agree with the Democrats' reason for refusing to remove the loopholes? Their intention was liberal; they thought they could kill the whole bill. What they managed to do, despite their small numbers and lack of influence, is destroy their rino allies who will be sent packing soon enough.


I love listening to conspiracy theories.
 
2012-05-28 10:13:46 PM
The Why Not Guy: Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this.

According to Wikipedia, 32 of the 40 current Kansas State Senators are Republicans.


Non sequitur.
 
2012-05-28 10:18:38 PM
Rann Xerox: It's time to erect an electric fence around Kansas and then watch as political revolution unfolds when Kansan plutocrats are dragged kicking and screaming to the guillotines. Or the electric bleachers.

Well, it'd be more like the wealthy would hire the strong men to kill everyone else then fly out in a helicopter, but your idea could be great too. Might as well build a fence so the people can't get out and watch the carnage unfold. They brought it on themselves for electing the asshats. Could even set up benches outside the gate for people in other states to watch for a fee, letting those states get good money.
 
2012-05-28 10:26:14 PM
skullkrusher: Nuclear Monk: skullkrusher: A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?

FTFY

hehe also a valid question though I suppose people of lesser means don't always have the ability to GTFO


Kansas: where people from Indiana go to escape a hectic lifestyle?
 
2012-05-28 10:26:19 PM
Noam Chimpsky: The Why Not Guy: Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this.

According to Wikipedia, 32 of the 40 current Kansas State Senators are Republicans.

Non sequitur.


So Republicans are liberals now, if they're in Kansas and vote for a bad law?

Good to know.
 
2012-05-28 10:30:30 PM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Noam Chimpsky: downpaymentblues: Noam Chimpsky: How many liberal Democrats there are in the Kansas senate is irrelevant to the fact that 100% of those liberal Democrats are opposed to moderating the bill and removing the loopholes you are all worked up about.

Since this is FARK, I can't tell if you are a joke account or actually believe what you are saying.

How do you know that you don't agree with the Democrats' reason for refusing to remove the loopholes? Their intention was liberal; they thought they could kill the whole bill. What they managed to do, despite their small numbers and lack of influence, is destroy their rino allies who will be sent packing soon enough.

I love listening to conspiracy theories.


You're supposed to call it "bipartisan cooperation". I actually prefer your word "conspiracy", though. It's perfectly literal.

con·spir·a·cy (kn-spîr-s)

A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design.

sin·is·ter (sn-str)
adj.
.
On the left side; left.
 
2012-05-28 10:32:12 PM
slykens1: Salt Lick Steady: Seriously? I mean, really? DC residents pay the highest federal taxes per capita.

The reason DC receives so much federal money is because it's the freaking capital of the country. The federal government operates the courts, there are huge security costs, federal government is exempt from property taxes, and Congress has explicitly forbidden the imposition of certain taxes such as commuter tax.

Good god you're an idiot.

Looks like the point of my post passed you by, idiot.

Looking at per-dollar return on federal taxes is a pretty moronic way to determine whether a state is a "welfare queen" for the very reasons you espoused. Federal spending is not even per capita across the states. Some states have lots of federal institutions (DC, for example), some have very few in comparison to their population.

A more interesting analysis would be assistance spending from the federal level to states for things like Medicaid and Education, as examples. I would exclude spending related to the operation of the government, military, Medicare, and Social Security.


I wouldn't exclude government or military if locals are employed by the military and government presence there. Why? Because they hold jobs which are created by the federal government which they would not have if the military or government was not there. That is a significant amount of federal money sent there fueling their economy they would not have normally since government work pays more and has better benefits than in the private sector on average.
 
2012-05-28 10:36:27 PM
skullkrusher: A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?

You don't think those all those poor people are going to victimize themselves, do you?

/Also, Kansas will now be known as the Corporate Theocracy of Kansuckistan.
 
2012-05-28 10:48:07 PM
Trolljegeren: skullkrusher: A) Does Kansas have rich people? B) If so, why?

You don't think those all those poor people are going to victimize themselves, do you?

/Also, Kansas will now be known as the Corporate Theocracy of Kansuckistan.


www.pitch.com
 
2012-05-28 10:49:27 PM
What kind of drugs has Noam Chimpsky been ingesting?

I'm thinking it's Drano.
 
2012-05-28 11:08:52 PM
Kittypie070: What kind of drugs has Noam Chimpsky been ingesting?

I'm thinking it's Drano.


If only.
 
2012-05-28 11:39:39 PM
Why would people in Kansas require education? They have a Bible. That's all the larnin' they require.

Remind me never to hire someone who has ever lived in Kansas.
 
2012-05-29 12:00:33 AM
tenpoundsofcheese: Emposter: Tenpoundsofretard: I'm incapable of considering factors like social spending, so the only thing happening in this story is a reduction even if it's only half a percent!

wow. you doubled down on your mistake

the reduction is 14 percent.

It is a half a percentage point, but the decrease people will see in their tax bill is about 14 percent.

no wonder you have the bad reputation you have here.


holy shiat, you're really going with a percentage of a percentage as a major benefit? what, is 14% of jack-shiat really going to change poor peoples lives? is it going to create a single farking job?

once again, you're a shining beacon of derp, favorited in retard red.

i'll give you a .5% bonus for being able to do the basic math in the first place.
 
2012-05-29 12:00:45 AM
static6.businessinsider.com

So with all their tax savings they'll make a bid for Wisconsin again in 2014?
 
2012-05-29 12:10:57 AM
Lost Thought 00: And before you know it, all the Randian idealists, the self-proclaimed John Galts, will find themselves in a strange situation as there no longer are any janitors to pick up the trash, no one stocking grocery stores, and no one left who wants to consume their "professional services" as everyone else has moved across the border.

If they can afford to move, then they're not poor enough yet, and they need to be made poorer. But don't worry, we'll get there.

Q: Why does gasoline cost more in the ghetto?
A: So you don't leave.
 
2012-05-29 12:14:45 AM
How in the 21st century is this possible?
 
2012-05-29 12:23:13 AM
Kansas lawmakers are just equalizing the tax structure for those who have no skin in the game.
 
2012-05-29 12:34:14 AM
Aren't the Koch brothers from Wichita, the biggest city in Kansas?
 
2012-05-29 12:48:29 AM
zimmerman: This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it?

Doesn't sound too terrible if you're from a wealthy town. If you're not you're shiat out of luck. I went to school in a fairly poor town in NH which also had the disadvantage of having a lot of retirees, none of whom wanted to contribute so much as a nickle of their tax money to education. This was reflected in everything, most especially graduation rate (about 65% compared to a state average of over 80 %), and SAT scores, which were about a hundred points below the state average.
 
2012-05-29 12:52:55 AM
herrDrFarkenstein: So with all their tax savings they'll make a bid for Wisconsin again in 2014?

Unfortunately, according to recent polls, it looks like they won't have to make another bid for Wisconsin.
 
2012-05-29 12:58:38 AM
So this madness is the compromise plan? What was the original, reintroduction of slavery for anyone making less than 250k a year? Death camps for the poor, leather goods made from their skin for the rich? I'm going to go watch The Day After so I can see Kansas get nuked by socialists. It's things like this that make me think I really ought not to be in a hurry to get a passport and go to the US. I'd rather stay in Canada right now. Try this stuff in Canada and your ears would burn at the gales of derisive laughter that would follow. We won't even let a Conservative mayor of Toronto feck about with the buses, let alone set in motion a plan to annihilate any vestige of civil society that would make a James Bond villain say "Here, this is going a bit too far!"
 
2012-05-29 01:17:51 AM
gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]


I have two gripes with that chart.

One: New Mexico is really a purple state that leans blue... We are by NO means a hotbed for Derp. (we have edge derp, but darn it, every state does!)

Two: Do you have any IDEA how much of that money that comes into our state goes to our various Science Institutions, Military bases and National Parks? We built the worlds first atomic bomb here... Sandia Labs? FLETC? Carlsbad Caverns? White Sands Testing grounds?

As an extremely low population state, with that much government employ going on... Im not so sure that our place at the top of the derp heap is warranted :/
 
2012-05-29 01:58:41 AM
Can we just go back to Feudalism? This inch-by-inch method is just taking too long.
 
2012-05-29 02:02:50 AM
The Tea Partiers didn't want government in their lives. Now that the state won't be able to afford government programs and public education, now they have their wish.

Still wondering if Kris Kobach is involved in this some way? He seems to be the GOP/Tea Party's "Go to" guy.
 
2012-05-29 02:14:16 AM
Next time there is a tornado in KS, I hope the Feds won't declare a disaster zone. They can help themselves and God will help them for helping themselves.
 
2012-05-29 02:34:30 AM
Does this get precedence of Kansas getting it's own tag before Arizona?
 
2012-05-29 02:55:17 AM
Need Help Soonish: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

I have two gripes with that chart.

One: New Mexico is really a purple state that leans blue... We are by NO means a hotbed for Derp. (we have edge derp, but darn it, every state does!)

Two: Do you have any IDEA how much of that money that comes into our state goes to our various Science Institutions, Military bases and National Parks? We built the worlds first atomic bomb here... Sandia Labs? FLETC? Carlsbad Caverns? White Sands Testing grounds?

As an extremely low population state, with that much government employ going on... Im not so sure that our place at the top of the derp heap is warranted :/


Greetings from Albuquerque. Yeah, I don't think it is, either. We're basically the playground for the Department of Defense; a lot of the money it spends on developing and testing its toys gets spent here. This brings in not only a lot of troops and materials but also a lot of well-paid scientists (Taos has the second highest number of Ph.D.s per capita, if I remember correctly). And believe me, if the federal money reflected in that graph were put towards welfare programs, we wouldn't be such a dirt-poor state.

And yes, New Mexico is fairly blue, but only because it has Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Taos balancing out the rednecks populating the rest of the state. Obama's currently leading Romney by about 16 points though, so that's good.
 
2012-05-29 03:31:05 AM
TheDebbieDee: Aren't the Koch brothers from Wichita, the biggest city in Kansas?

That's like saying you're from the shallowest sewer in New York, I guess.
 
2012-05-29 03:42:42 AM
I like how when Obvious Racist Reference Troll was replaced by Actual Funny, Clever Troll when we got tired of smacking around the first one.

Drew, this is not a good way to stir debate on a website.
 
2012-05-29 04:26:20 AM
To save money, Kansas will be in black & white, just like the old days.
 
2012-05-29 04:54:15 AM
Can we just declare "government over" and start over? Dissolve the union and let the states form union along ideological lines?

It will end the obstructionism and infighting.
 
2012-05-29 06:04:14 AM
I, for one, would love to thank the great people of Kansas. They are certainly doing their part to re-elect President Obama and hand back control of both houses of Congress to the Democrats this November.

You see, I thought we would only have small scale examples of Tea Party Derpfests to point to this year, to show just how destructive the far right can be to our communities. For example, Josephine County, OR, where the populous there chose to vote down a tax levy earlier this month, forcing massive layoff of the county employees. They will have only one full-time police officer for the entire county after regular business hours, being the Sheriff himself. For a county of 83,000 residents. There are a few contract police for Cave Junction during business hours, but otherwise the Sheriff will be policing the entire state alone. His nearest back-up will be Oregon State Police troopers, who could be up to one hour away.

Josephine county also had to release all but the 30 most violent prisoners from their jail, with 90 being released because they can't afford to keep them anymore. The DA's office let most of his staff go, and will only be able to prosecute violent felonies from now on. So if you want to drive drunk in Oregon, do it in Josephine county, since it'll only get you a ticket.

Anyway, I thought the Democrats would only have examples like Josephine County, OR to point to as examples of the damage the Tea Party can do to a society, but no... Now we have the entire state of Kansas to point to. So thank you, citizens of Kansas. I only hope that you all realize your massive mistake and repeal this tax law before your state completely implodes.
 
2012-05-29 06:33:27 AM

So... only little people will pay income taxes in Kansas now?

upload.wikimedia.org

Getting a posthumous kick, etc.


/Hot like an angry Leona.
 
2012-05-29 07:16:24 AM
Russ Feingold's Brass Balls: I like how when Obvious Racist Reference Troll was replaced by Actual Funny, Clever Troll when we got tired of smacking around the first one.

Drew, this is not a good way to stir debate on a website.


1. New headline gets greened
2. New troll shows up immediately

Or as I like to call it, "The mod shift change".
 
2012-05-29 07:18:54 AM
Baz744: gaspode: It is the logical extension of a situation where you have states competing for business in a federation without sufficient central authority over matters of taxation and regulation. Sooner or later a state will go insane and try to literally give money to businesses to come there. Its completely unsustainable of course. If the repubs get their way and can the EPA, Fed etc then states like this will also remove all environmental regulations, Financial regulation etc.

Well done.

You say that like it's a bad thing. Restoring this country to its foundational principles is nothing but good.


Can't tell if sarcastic.
 
2012-05-29 08:02:37 AM
Cataholic: Somacandra: I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.

It's not an entirely honest portrayal of the effect of this. Professionals sill have to pay some income tax even if they are in a partnership or S-Corp. The only tax that Kansas removed is on that portion of the income that is attributable to being a business profit. The portion that is attributable to the services that the owner personally performs (wages) is still taxed. While owners do set their own salaries (and thus could make them artificially low to avoid taxation), there are objective standards that the IRS uses to determine whether or not the salary is a reasonable one. If they feel it is not, they will adjust the owners figures accordingly.


The IRS??? What the f**k are you talking about?
 
2012-05-29 08:35:19 AM
If I had to live in Kansas I'd probably support policies that obviously hasten my own demise as well.

You think they're being stupid. I argue they just realize that they have to live in Kansas, so why not do whatever they can to ameliorate the suffering?

/ there's a word in this post that people from Kansas don't understand
// actually more than one
/// in case you haven't guessed the words are: "If I had to live in Kansas I'd probably support policies that obviously hasten my own demise as well. You think they're being stupid. I argue they just realize that they have to live in Kansas, so why not do whatever they can to ameliorate the suffering?"
//// go to hell, Kansas
 
2012-05-29 09:09:56 AM
ಠ_ಠ
 
2012-05-29 09:16:28 AM
The Name: Need Help Soonish: gimmegimme: Well, at least Kansas will shoot up one chart:

[exportingblue.files.wordpress.com image 640x470]

I have two gripes with that chart.

One: New Mexico is really a purple state that leans blue... We are by NO means a hotbed for Derp. (we have edge derp, but darn it, every state does!)

Two: Do you have any IDEA how much of that money that comes into our state goes to our various Science Institutions, Military bases and National Parks? We built the worlds first atomic bomb here... Sandia Labs? FLETC? Carlsbad Caverns? White Sands Testing grounds?

As an extremely low population state, with that much government employ going on... Im not so sure that our place at the top of the derp heap is warranted :/

Greetings from Albuquerque. Yeah, I don't think it is, either. We're basically the playground for the Department of Defense; a lot of the money it spends on developing and testing its toys gets spent here. This brings in not only a lot of troops and materials but also a lot of well-paid scientists (Taos has the second highest number of Ph.D.s per capita, if I remember correctly). And believe me, if the federal money reflected in that graph were put towards welfare programs, we wouldn't be such a dirt-poor state.

And yes, New Mexico is fairly blue, but only because it has Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Taos balancing out the rednecks populating the rest of the state. Obama's currently leading Romney by about 16 points though, so that's good.


Well, NM politics are a tad strange... We may have a republican in Santa Fe right now, but that's ONLY because the Dem party put up a stinker in that election :/

I see us turning a more solid blue as the years pass and the republicans keep up their anti-dark folks Derp... One can only hope.

/// \m/ from Roswell :P
 
2012-05-29 09:18:51 AM
Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming have no state income tax though Kansas should have abolished it for everyone
 
2012-05-29 09:34:13 AM
Like others have mentioned other states have no income tax and they are in nicer parts of the country, if you are working poor why bother living in Kansas.
 
2012-05-29 09:43:11 AM
ultraholland: why do you people continually respond to tenpoundsofskookum?

I don't know why they do either... but you can put him/her on your ignore list. All I see is gray stuff from him/her. Farkers can quote him/her left and right and I still do not get to read the nonsense from tenpoundsofderp.
 
2012-05-29 09:58:08 AM
L82DPRT: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming have no state income tax though Kansas should have abolished it for everyone

AK, mineral taxes
FL, not a role model
NV, prostitution and gambling and prostitution taxes
SD, shiathole w/o infrastructure
WY, mineral taxes
 
2012-05-29 10:15:21 AM
herrDrFarkenstein: L82DPRT: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming have no state income tax though Kansas should have abolished it for everyone

AK, mineral taxes
FL, not a role model
NV, prostitution and gambling and prostitution taxes
SD, shiathole w/o infrastructure
WY, mineral taxes


Mhmm.

Note: a positive AGI into all states is a NEGATIVE outflow from such high tax states as NY, CA and IL and negative Net AGI Into All States (thousands) means an inflow to states like TX, NV, WY, WA and FL.
 
2012-05-29 10:16:09 AM
Krymson Tyde: "Who will still be paying Kansas income tax? Only three groups: 1) employees, 2) some retirees and 3) individuals whose investments are so modest that they cannot afford to create a trust or partnership to shelter their investment income."

Unfarkingbelievable.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present your GOP!


No BS, no spin, no hyperbole necessary. A simple statement of the actual facts is enough to shock and dumbfound any reasonable person.

And still, people will defend this derp to the death. For some goddamn reason or other.
 
2012-05-29 10:34:49 AM
Good for Kansas.

.....Cause I don't live there.

images.topix.com
 
2012-05-29 10:35:51 AM
Insofar as several states have no income tax at all on anybody, I doubt this change will lead to major disaster for Kansas. I expect property and sales taxes to rise accordingly.
 
2012-05-29 10:37:54 AM
herrDrFarkenstein: L82DPRT: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming have no state income tax though Kansas should have abolished it for everyone

AK, mineral taxes
FL, not a role model
NV, prostitution and gambling and prostitution taxes
SD, shiathole w/o infrastructure
WY, mineral taxes


NH has no state income tax either and it's not a shiathole and is firmly in the "gives-more-than-it-takes" area of the chart.
 
2012-05-29 11:12:23 AM
jso2897: Cataholic: Somacandra: I understand that the author is a professor of tax law, specializing in estate and bankruptcy taxation. If this is an accurate summary of the new taxation regime, its hard to imagine Kansas sustaining itself in terms of basic services--police, fire, education, road maintenance, national guard as well as state regulatory and licensing services. Also, this means that abortion providers wouldn't pay any taxes either, except perhaps the receptionist. I'm not sure Kansans will accept all this.

It's not an entirely honest portrayal of the effect of this. Professionals sill have to pay some income tax even if they are in a partnership or S-Corp. The only tax that Kansas removed is on that portion of the income that is attributable to being a business profit. The portion that is attributable to the services that the owner personally performs (wages) is still taxed. While owners do set their own salaries (and thus could make them artificially low to avoid taxation), there are objective standards that the IRS uses to determine whether or not the salary is a reasonable one. If they feel it is not, they will adjust the owners figures accordingly.

The IRS??? What the f**k are you talking about?


It's a division within the Department of Treasury...you may have heard of it. They are the pesky guys who make you fill out a tax return and pay them money every year.
 
2012-05-29 11:19:31 AM
Sabyen91: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii:
That's a canard. Kansas, between 1990 and 2009, has taken in all of 24.7 billion in federal spending more than they paid in taxes. STAGGERING FIGURES!

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-uni o n

But please, keep right on with that "welfare queen" business.

Riiiiiight. Link


Hey! Everyone knows that "Legal Services" is a lib front organization designed to make lawyers available to poor people, in direct contravention of the way God wants it.

Only rich people get lawyers, in God's country.
 
2012-05-29 11:28:39 AM
arcas: Insofar as several states have no income tax at all on anybody, I doubt this change will lead to major disaster for Kansas. I expect property and sales taxes to rise accordingly.

You know, this is a dead thread, but I'm just amazed that anyone is dumb enough to say what you just said. In the states with no income tax EVERYONE is exempt from paying that tax. In Kansas, only the rich are exempt.

Are you really unable to see the difference?
 
2012-05-29 11:32:33 AM
malaktaus: zimmerman: This keeps the money local to the towns, so they can go a long way towards funding their own schools - doesn't sound too terrible does it?

Doesn't sound too terrible if you're from a wealthy town. If you're not you're shiat out of luck. I went to school in a fairly poor town in NH which also had the disadvantage of having a lot of retirees, none of whom wanted to contribute so much as a nickle of their tax money to education. This was reflected in everything, most especially graduation rate (about 65% compared to a state average of over 80 %), and SAT scores, which were about a hundred points below the state average.


Agreed (there's a lawsuit about that actually), but for very small towns, union schools are an option, and the bottom line is people need to realize that property taxes are 'it' for the main funding for the towns. So something definitely needs to be done for the poor / small towns - but state house avoids 'mandatory' funding levels. I don't know the soluttion, other than people being such pig headed republicans that they won't spend a dime to support their larger community.
 
2012-05-29 12:19:28 PM
504_King_streetcar: So this madness is the compromise plan? What was the original, reintroduction of slavery for anyone making less than 250k a year? Death camps for the poor, leather goods made from their skin for the rich? I'm going to go watch The Day After so I can see Kansas get nuked by socialists. It's things like this that make me think I really ought not to be in a hurry to get a passport and go to the US. I'd rather stay in Canada right now. Try this stuff in Canada and your ears would burn at the gales of derisive laughter that would follow. We won't even let a Conservative mayor of Toronto feck about with the buses, let alone set in motion a plan to annihilate any vestige of civil society that would make a James Bond villain say "Here, this is going a bit too far!"


So someone in Canada is upset about the tax policies of one US state? So upset, in fact, that he wants to watch some old war movie to see that state get nuked? Wow dude, you REALLY need to get a life.
 
2012-05-29 12:21:21 PM
Splinshints: If I had to live in Kansas I'd probably support policies that obviously hasten my own demise as well.

You think they're being stupid. I argue they just realize that they have to live in Kansas, so why not do whatever they can to ameliorate the suffering?

/ there's a word in this post that people from Kansas don't understand
// actually more than one
/// in case you haven't guessed the words are: "If I had to live in Kansas I'd probably support policies that obviously hasten my own demise as well. You think they're being stupid. I argue they just realize that they have to live in Kansas, so why not do whatever they can to ameliorate the suffering?"
//// go to hell, Kansas


You first cocksucker.
 
2012-05-29 12:38:58 PM
bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP


CA requires a supermajority to pass a budget. Guess what? The Democrats don't have a supermajority in the legislation, so the GOP constantly farks with them. I think CA has had a budget crisis every year for the last 5 or 6 years. Remember when Arnie furloughed all the contract workers a couple of years ago? Yeah, I picked the wrong day to go the DMV. Took me 4 hours to renew, and I didn't even have to take a test.

Couple that with the prop system, and CA is screwed financially.
 
2012-05-29 12:41:27 PM
Mike Chewbacca: bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP

CA requires a supermajority to pass a budget. Guess what? The Democrats don't have a supermajority in the legislation, so the GOP constantly farks with them. I think CA has had a budget crisis every year for the last 5 or 6 years. Remember when Arnie furloughed all the contract workers a couple of years ago? Yeah, I picked the wrong day to go the DMV. Took me 4 hours to renew, and I didn't even have to take a test.

Couple that with the prop system, and CA is screwed financially.


It's NEVER the retarded levels of spending though is it?
 
2012-05-29 01:15:45 PM
Sorry if this has already been addressed, but has the news of this been picked up by other media outlets? I looked at CNN/Fox News/NPR and I didn't see any articles there talking about it one way or the other
 
2012-05-29 02:33:43 PM
The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Mike Chewbacca: bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP

CA requires a supermajority to pass a budget. Guess what? The Democrats don't have a supermajority in the legislation, so the GOP constantly farks with them. I think CA has had a budget crisis every year for the last 5 or 6 years. Remember when Arnie furloughed all the contract workers a couple of years ago? Yeah, I picked the wrong day to go the DMV. Took me 4 hours to renew, and I didn't even have to take a test.

Couple that with the prop system, and CA is screwed financially.

It's NEVER the retarded levels of spending though is it?


Yes, it is. That's why I mentioned the prop system. The prop system forces CA to spend money OR ELSE and then the legislation can't pass a budget because the GOP refuses to raise taxes. Remember, CA needs a 2/3 majority to pass a budget. Even as Blue as CA is, it's not 67% Blue.

If you actually knew anything about the way CA works, you'd have understood that.
 
2012-05-29 02:42:21 PM
Mike Chewbacca: The_Sheriff_Is_A_Niiii: Mike Chewbacca: bhcompy: neongoats: Take note, citizens.

This is what the GOP would do to the entirety of America. ALL OF AMERICA.

There is nothing good, pure or intelligent left in the GOP.

And how do you explain California, exactly? That shiat ain't the GOP

CA requires a supermajority to pass a budget. Guess what? The Democrats don't have a supermajority in the legislation, so the GOP constantly farks with them. I think CA has had a budget crisis every year for the last 5 or 6 years. Remember when Arnie furloughed all the contract workers a couple of years ago? Yeah, I picked the wrong day to go the DMV. Took me 4 hours to renew, and I didn't even have to take a test.

Couple that with the prop system, and CA is screwed financially.

It's NEVER the retarded levels of spending though is it?

Yes, it is. That's why I mentioned the prop system. The prop system forces CA to spend money OR ELSE and then the legislation can't pass a budget because the GOP refuses to raise taxes. Remember, CA needs a 2/3 majority to pass a budget. Even as Blue as CA is, it's not 67% Blue.

If you actually knew anything about the way CA works, you'd have understood that.


Yup people vote in unfunded mandates but don't want the tax increases to pay for them. Yet on top of this we still pay out more in taxes than we get back so the GOP tards in states like Kansas can play out their unsustainable tax policies.
 
2012-05-29 02:48:59 PM
Mike Chewbacca: If you actually knew anything about the way CA works, you'd have understood that.

If you gaze for long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
 
2012-05-29 03:33:23 PM
What a Jayhawk may look like:

farm7.staticflickr.com
 
2012-05-29 04:52:54 PM
Noam Chimpsky: The Why Not Guy: Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this.

According to Wikipedia, 32 of the 40 current Kansas State Senators are Republicans.

Non sequitur.


Do you think that Kansas Republicans are likely to be liberals?
 
2012-05-29 07:06:11 PM
Mike Chewbacca: and then the legislation can't pass a budget because the GOP refuses to raise taxes.

Except for, you know, when CA had a Republican governor and raised taxes a whole bunch of times in an 8 year period.
 
2012-05-29 08:08:05 PM
HairBolus: One of the issues the leading up to Civil War was whether Kansas should be a free state or a slave state.

The Union victory decided this as "free".


Kansas was admitted as a free state just before the shooting started at Fort Sumter.
 
2012-05-29 08:15:42 PM
i25.photobucket.com

He steals from the poor and he gives to the rich --
Stupid bitsch!
 
2012-05-29 09:51:54 PM
The Why Not Guy: Noam Chimpsky: I just found a better source and it turns out the liberal Kansas senate is to blame for this.

According to Wikipedia, 32 of the 40 current Kansas State Senators are Republicans.




More proof that the lieberals have infiltrated the Republican party!
 
2012-05-29 09:59:40 PM
Lee Jackson Beauregard: HairBolus: One of the issues the leading up to Civil War was whether Kansas should be a free state or a slave state.

The Union victory decided this as "free".

Kansas was admitted as a free state just before the shooting started at Fort Sumter.


So what? If the Confederacy had decisively won the war and won Kansas as spoils they would have made Kansas a slave state.

Its current Republican legislature is just enacting the pre-war Southern slave ideology though less on a pure racial basis.
 
2012-05-29 11:39:27 PM
bobbette:
lady uteruses



Er, is there another kind?
 
Displayed 531 of 531 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report