If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support
style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
See, this sounds like someone confusing 'sinful' with 'distasteful.' Do you think he has that kind of visceral 'ewwww' reaction to all sin? Do you think someone who steals paperclips from the office or skims a bit off the travel account makes him want to vomit?
dameron:He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
You know what, though? If you put all the heterosexual males inside in electrified pen, they would reproduce!
If he's saying that only homosexuals produce homosexuals, then I assume all those alleged heterosexual couples producing homosexual children are really homosexuals themselves and should also be penned up.
He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
Chariset:See, this sounds like someone confusing 'sinful' with 'distasteful.' Do you think he has that kind of visceral 'ewwww' reaction to all sin? Do you think someone who steals paperclips from the office or skims a bit off the travel account makes him want to vomit?
And by vomit, he meant vomit sperm out of his penis.
Yeah yeah its a stereotype, but goddamn if this isn't an example of protesting too much I don't know what is.
Hoban Washburne:As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
Gwendolyn:Hoban Washburne: As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
Oooo. I hadn't thought of that.
It's effectively why I consider myself a citizen of New Orleans, but not Louisiana.
Aw, isn't that cute. I know we're not supposed to Godwin, but come on. This guy in nearly every shape wants to create Nazi concentration camps. The only thing he didn't say is that we should have pink triangles stitched to our clothes.
Disgusting.
If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
gilgigamesh:Weaver95: WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
...Yahweh....
*cough*
Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'. sort of like having a big brother who really does try to do the right thing, but goes about it all wrong.
Then there's Christ, who's actually a pretty decent god. his followers though...yeesh. some of those guys either didn't get the message or they're just working for some of the old gods and/or demons and using Christ as camoflage. Or maybe the old ones ganged up on Jesus and murdered him and keep his skinned corpse around as a shared disguse. At any rate, a lot of people pretend to follow the Christian god but don't actually do anything he said that his followers should be doing.
And last - but not least - there's the Holy Spirit. Who gets something of a bad rap. sort of like the silent, creepy younger brother. he hangs around and inspires people. sort of like a muse...he fires you up and then lets you loose to do your stuff. In theory, Christ is supposed to direct that passion to do good things...but given how many people aren't actually doing Christ's work, mostly that passion gets misdirected. so these days, the Spirit sort of gave up and works at skate parks in southern california.
Weaver95:Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'. sort of like having a big brother who really does try to do the right thing, but goes about it all wrong.
Then there's Christ, who's actually a pretty decent god. his followers though...yeesh. some of those guys either didn't get the message or they're just working for some of the old gods and/or demons and using Christ as camoflage. Or maybe the old ones ganged up on Jesus and murdered him and keep his skinned corpse around as a shared disguse. At any rate, a lot of people pretend to follow the Christian god but don't actually do anything he said that his followers should be doing.
And last - but not least - there's the Holy Spirit. Who gets something of a bad rap. sort of like the silent, creepy younger brother. he hangs around and inspires people. sort of like a muse...he fires you up and then lets you loose to do your stuff. In theory, Christ is supposed to direct that passion to do good things...but given how many people aren't actually doing Christ's work, mostly that passion gets misdirected. so these days, the Spirit sort of gave up and works at skate parks in southern california.
"Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I always hear blanket statements from Christians regarding the Muslim faith all being terrorists because they don't do enough to denounce the crazies among them. Well, Christians, here's an example of a crazy among you who is just as vile as those that committed the attacks of 9-11. He condones mass murder; he is calling for it. The only difference is that those guys actually had the balls to go through with their horrible plans, while this guy is most likely just a cowardly raging pussy that can't handle someone being a little different than him. I'm willing to bet that, with the exception of a few individuals here, this man's sickening and violent rhetoric will not be denounced to any major extent. This is why I despise Christianity. It isn't that one crazy says something like this; it's that the powers that be within your organization will turn a blind eye to it while condemning others for doing the same thing.
Oh, and before we get too much into 'OMG all christianz iz lik dis!!111!1!' consider that this pastor is a baptist. they're the guys who give fire and brimstone hellfire preachers indigestion.
Weaver95:Oh, and before we get too much into 'OMG all christianz iz lik dis!!111!1!' consider that this pastor is a baptist. they're the guys who give fire and brimstone hellfire preachers indigestion.
Sorry, Weaver -- Farkers don't listen to reason when there's blood in the water.
Jesus wore a robe and sandals for day to day business, had long hair, hung out almost exclusively with men except for prostitutes and loved wine enough to create it out of water.
A Taliban by any other name would still be a religious extremist
/I say watch list 'im
I honestly don't care what someone preaches about from their pulpit. hellfire, love and respect, be nice to kittens, murder gays in their sleep...it's all good. they can stand up there and talk 'till they're blue in the face. it's when the nutballs get quiet that I start to worry. up in public? have at it junior. nutball who suddenly gets really quiet and develops an interest in paying for rental trucks with fake IDs and money orders...that's a problem.
Weaver95:Oh, and before we get too much into 'OMG all christianz iz lik dis!!111!1!' consider that this pastor is a baptist. they're the guys who give fire and brimstone hellfire preachers indigestion.
I'm more partial to the Christians that claim that no Christians really believe this kind of stuff.
dameron:He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid:"Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
WorldCitizen:If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
No. If there is a God who agrees with this man, it should never be worshipped, and instead a means to destroy it should be found as soon as possible so that other Gods and Goddesses (and us humans) don't have to put up with this shiat.
I can't see Kings Peter and Edmund, as well as Queens Susan and Lucy---ever allowing the treatment of fellow Sons of Adam and Daughters of Eve this way.
Weaver95:couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
Oh please, we have blood sacrifices all the time--we just do it in the name of the State rather than some other God. That's what military service is all about.
If we put toddlers in a pen, they'll die off. They won't reproduce. Eventually all toddlers will die out.
If we put priests in a pen, they'll die off. They won't reproduce. Oh sure, they'll assign someone to be the designated altar boy, but that won't help.
Weaver95:nutball who suddenly gets really quiet and develops an interest in paying for rental trucks with fake IDs and money orders...that's a problem.
Well, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, nationalist groups and militias are fast approaching their 1990's apex. Combine all the derp with an economy that realized it was solely existing on credit and home equity loans? Yeah, there are plenty of those groups out there, and their Lone wolf offspring. I'm surprised they haven't made a few moves yet. It's just a matter of when. I won't be shocked. In fact, I bet you they get a PTSD soldier to do it. Someone's who's in severe mental and physical anguish, easily corruptible and agitated because of the medication they're on. It practically writes itself.
I can see why DHS issued the warning they did about the danger of Real Americans™... They don't need religion as much these days. Plenty of just hate for hate's sake is drivin' these boys.
Weaver95:Oh, and before we get too much into 'OMG all christianz iz lik dis!!111!1!' consider that this pastor is a baptist. they're the guys who give fire and brimstone hellfire preachers indigestion.
You'd be surprised. I'd be willing to be far more Christians agree with this guy on some level than completely disagree. They may not want all gays in a pen to die off, but only because they don't have the balls to take it to its logical conclusion.
it's a rare Christian indeed, in my experience, who is completely okay with my not following their lifestyle choices.
I passed a new law yesterday. It is now legal to beat this guy with an aluminum bat. In fact, if you are willing to fill out paper work, there is grant money available.
propasaurus:dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
You know what, though? If you put all the heterosexual males inside in electrified pen, they would reproduce!
Hoban Washburne:As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
No shiat. If you're planning a vacation to Disney World, be sure to do it during "gay days". All the fundies boycott during that time, and everyone else who goes is extraordinarily polite, and a hell of a lot of fun.
oh sure, it starts with penning them up in an electric fence... But then Trader Joes moves in, a series of botiques and designer shops are set up within, until you can't go more than a block without stumbling into a cupcake store or a starbucks. Finally property values rise so much that renting there takes most of your paycheck.
So freaking violent! I blame the MPAA. You can't show nekkid boobies or any sexual contact without an R rating, but you can scream hate and perpetrate violence till the cows come home and still get a PG. Methinks this is part of the reason some people are all squeamish about sex (gasp!) in all its iterations and permutations and yet have no problem whippin out a weapon to destroy something they perceive as a threat to their beliefs of how the world SHOULD be. Yay for prudish intolerance!
Hoban Washburne:As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
bwahahahahahahahah nice one seriously, we could just move all the nutbags to texas and build a fence
evil saltine:Benevolent Misanthrope: it's a rare Christian indeed, in my experience, who is completely okay with my not following their lifestyle choices.
"lifestyle choices"?
Well, that's what the more enlightened Christians call my being gay...
I've been saying this all along (I even said it in my letter to the editor of Raleigh, NC's newspaper the News & Observer: my letter got published right before the primary): the christian bible is an article of faith, NOT FACT! The same goes for all "holy scripts". They are so wrong about so many things in reality.
I'll keep saying this until I'm blue in the face and fall over!
Not a single religion can prove that their version of god is the one true one (I'm talking empirical data using the scientific method). The ONLY thing we can be sure of is ourselves and each other and our relationships with each other.
Homosexuality has been with us since the dawn of humankind. It may be unusual in relation to the number of the populace, but it's not unnatural. It's not a choice, there's no biological gene, it's simply a state of being.
This so called pastor and those who think like him are a disgrace to the human race.
And by the way - here's another vote for the "What's the over/under on number of days before this asshole gets caught in flagrante delicto with a male escort?" camp.
Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
He asks his congregation if they could imagine kissing a man, then he just stands there and stares into the abyss. I knew exactly what was going in his mind.
rynthetyn:Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
It is opposition research. We have to have some clue what the enemy is up to.
Worley added, "It makes me pukin' sick to think about -- I don't even whether or not to say this in the pulpit -- can you imagine kissing some man?"
They cut off the rest of his speech:
"And touching his penis. Can you imagine putting his penis in your mouth? It's disgusting. Oh, and then his large member would go inside of my the anus. Finally he would spread his homosexual seed on my face. It's wrong. Large gay penises."
These guys really do get excited about homosexuality.
What the "gay" debate would look like if Christians practiced what Jesus preached.
Christian: You know homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of the Lord. Homosexual: What's your point. Christian: To enter into heaven and feel Gods love you might want to change your ways. Homosexual: Na. I'm cool. Christian: Well, I'll pray for your soul and I'll be available should you change your mind and want to follow the path to eternal salvation. Homosexual: Ok, but don't hold your breath.
LeroyBourne:He asks his congregation if they could imagine kissing a man, then he just stands there and stares into the abyss. I knew exactly what was going in his mind.
I was wondering if he was speaking to an all-male audience (not too far-fetched).
buckler:Hoban Washburne: As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
No shiat. If you're planning a vacation to Disney World, be sure to do it during "gay days". All the fundies boycott during that time, and everyone else who goes is extraordinarily polite, and a hell of a lot of fun.
Reminds me of when I lived in Indianapolis and went to Mid-west Bear fest.
Its held at a hotel with a few thousand big, burly gay men in attendance and only one bar in the whole joint. Which of course is busy non-stop. I remember asking one of the ladies if this was the busiest they ever got and she said that the only time that was comparable was the Indy 500 or the Brickyard, but that drunk gay men were a helluva lot politer and retardedly extravagant tippers.
Felt sorry at first for one of the bartenders who was straight, and an absurdly hot looking lumberjack fellow who was CONSTANTLY being hit on, and said so to him. He just looked at me incredulously and was like "please, in another hour or so when these guys start really getting drunk, I take my shirt off and before the nights over will have enough money for 6 months mortgage payments!"
Submitter: "Christian" pastor calls for gays to be imprisoned in an electrified pen until they die. A Taliban spokesman commented: "Seriously? Don't you think that's a bit over-the-top?"
The Taliban would probably say it's over the top, sure... because why waste all that land when you can just line them up along a ditch and spray AK-47 rounds at them.
Even scarier: The Taliban actually control places with people, unlike this idiot preacher. Not only do they have the power to do this, but they DO do this.
See also: Wahabi Salafism in Saudi Arabia and other emirates.
Christianity is pretty much powerless to do anything like this idiot preacher's vision, and it's doubtful anybody would ever let someone like him get that power in this country... in other words, his brand of extremism is powerless, impotent in today's world. Giving them a voice outside of their narrow minded (and in most cases, unable to change) cult members is dumb and only serves to give them a greater audience - even legitimizing their opinions to those that might otherwise remain on the fence.
Worry more about the jackass extremists who kill people DAILY for their beliefs or biology (race, orientation, sex) RIGHT NOW.
dennysgod:What the "gay" debate would look like if Christians practiced what Jesus preached.
Christian: You know homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of the Lord. Homosexual: What's your point. Christian: To enter into heaven and feel Gods love you might want to change your ways. Homosexual: Na. I'm cool. Christian: Well, I'll pray for your soul and I'll be available should you change your mind and want to follow the path to eternal salvation. Homosexual: Ok, but don't hold your breath.
namatad:rynthetyn: Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
It is opposition research. We have to have some clue what the enemy is up to.
I think at this point, we're well aware of what they're up to. Beyond that, we're just legitimizing them. There comes a time where you need to just marginalize certain groups just like all of the racist hate groups have been marginalized and get ignored. As long as we keep reporting everything that each nutty preacher says, they're going to continue to be treated as if their opinion matters.
rynthetyn:Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
And then they feel the need to one up the last crazy thing that made the news as well. At least that what I want to believe but living in the land of the southern baptist I'm not so sure.
Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
LesserEvil:Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
The Republicans certainly think Jeremiah Wright has that power.
This pastor has missed the point entirely, and shaped Jesus' message to serve his own desires.
Like so many before him.
All I remember from Catholic services around Easter was the Priest constantly referring to how much Jesus LOVED Paul. I might have missed it, but there HAD to be a make out scene in there somewhere. NTTAWWT.
LesserEvil:Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Weaver95:And last - but not least - there's the Holy Spirit. Who gets something of a bad rap. sort of like the silent, creepy younger brother. he hangs around and inspires people. sort of like a muse...he fires you up and then lets you loose to do your stuff. In theory, Christ is supposed to direct that passion to do good things...but given how many people aren't actually doing Christ's work, mostly that passion gets misdirected. so these days, the Spirit sort of gave up and works at skate parks in southern california.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
rynthetyn:Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
I'd much rather people like this and the Westboro Baptists become the public face of religion in America personally.
Then maybe in a few generations mankind can finally throw off the shackles of religion once and for all and the abrahamic god can join the thousands of other omnipotent, omniscient gods in the graveyard of human history.
12349876:LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
The Republicans certainly think Jeremiah Wright has that power.
So I take it you believe this nutcase is completely powerless, and it would be better to ignore him, right?
fanatacism or extremism in ANY venue is unacceptable. religion, career, sports, sexuality, you name it. Balance is of vital importance.
Breaker Moran:Whenever I hear this kind of claptrap I tend to think "Gee, sorry Jimbo didn't let you suck his dick all those decades ago."
And then I think, man, mortality is a blessing.
Your observation is genius. it really is the cleansing gift none escape. not all funerals are mourned. people will party in the streets when that west baptist prick dies, for example.
Don't Troll Me Bro!:I always hear blanket statements from Christians regarding the Muslim faith all being terrorists because they don't do enough to denounce the crazies among them. Well, Christians, here's an example of a crazy among you who is just as vile as those that committed the attacks of 9-11. He condones mass murder; he is calling for it. The only difference is that those guys actually had the balls to go through with their horrible plans, while this guy is most likely just a cowardly raging pussy that can't handle someone being a little different than him. I'm willing to bet that, with the exception of a few individuals here, this man's sickening and violent rhetoric will not be denounced to any major extent. This is why I despise Christianity. It isn't that one crazy says something like this; it's that the powers that be within your organization will turn a blind eye to it while condemning others for doing the same thing.
you're painting with an economy sized paintbrush. there are what, ten of thousands of houses of worship just in america. there are multiple off-shoots of faiths. there are all sorts of walls and divisions between them. then there is location. a synagogue attending jew in brooklyn ny may not know what is taking place with pentecostals in jupiter FLA just as a devout roman catholic family in oregon may not hear about this news report at all.
i would expect some outrage from local people where the media coverage is highest. but to call out catholics as a whole for every one persons misdeeds, that's not very logical is it. that application doesn't carry over to politicians or military or police or any or group unless you in your ignorance want it to.
tinfoil-hat maggie:rynthetyn: Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
And then they feel the need to one up the last crazy thing that made the news as well. At least that what I want to believe but living in the land of the southern baptist I'm not so sure.
That sort of thing is definitely about trying to one-up the rivals to not only get press, but to prove to your congregation that you're as hard core as the neighboring preachers. Southern Baptists compete over everything, I was once at a Southern Baptist church where the interim pastor deliberately made sure to finish the service 10 minutes before the other Southern Baptist church that he used to be at.
Weaver95:Oh, and before we get too much into 'OMG all christianz iz lik dis!!111!1!' consider that this pastor is a baptist. they're the guys who give fire and brimstone hellfire preachers indigestion.
Yeah... I go to a baptist church and this guy makes me sick. I think it's mostly the southern baptists that have the hard core crazies. My church is pretty chill.
/plus, he's probably over- compensating for his own super-duper gayness.
I think it's funny how, every once in a while, an idiot comes along who says crap that's SO insane that not even randomjsa, tenpoundsofcheese or myrandomname will attempt to defend it.
LesserEvil:Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Honest question.
Having grown up in a similar church, I'll take a stab at this one:
I think it's more a case of him preaching what he knows will put money in the plate. He may have convinced himself that he's preaching the word of his god, but he also knows what his audience wants and what they expect from him. The congregants, in turn, believe him, because he's saying what they already "know" and "speaking truth". There is also the sense of being a persecuted minority, and the subsequent radicalization of thought that often happens when a group feels they must band together for security and survival - in this case, survival of their belief system in the face of a world and a Christianity that is rapidly changing. It's a vicious cycle.
If you've never seen the film "Marjoe", you should. And not just the parts about him - look at the other preachers and how they operate.
TheShavingofOccam123:LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Honest question.
[www.bittenandbound.com image 336x435]
I don't know. Why don't you ask Dr. Tiller.
So you fall into the category of those who believe the preacher holds great power over his followers, that all of their opinions are formed by that charismatic speaker on the pulpit? Everybody who seeks him out will be powerless to hold their own opinions, even if they are in opposition?
You think Dr. Tiller's death was the result of a preacher speaking, not of an individual asshole who was already of a vengeful, homicidal mind?
Christianity is pretty much powerless to do anything like this idiot preacher's vision, and it's doubtful anybody would ever let someone like him get that power in this country... in other words, his brand of extremism is powerless, impotent in today's world. Giving them a voice outside of their narrow minded (and in most cases, unable to change) cult members is dumb and only serves to give them a greater audience - even legitimizing their opinions to those that might otherwise remain on the fence.
1. We live in a country where a very large portion of the populace believe communism and Nazism are the same thing, where a sizable minority thinks the president was born in Kenya and where roughly half believe the world was created 6000 years ago? I personally do not have enough faith in the American population to recognize that it's bad to put an extremist who says crazy things into office (see: Rick Santorum got a lot of votes, and he wouldn't let his daughter abort her rape baby)
2. The NSDAP started with only 50 members in 1923. They fed off the fears of the masses (and abused crummy constitutional rules like emergency powers) and managed to get themselves in power to enact their heinous agenda in a little over a decade. Do you really think it's impossible for the combination of the Filibuster and Citizens United to instate some crazy nonsense like this in the US? In the country that had legal subjugation of minority races until the 1960s?
namatad:Hoban Washburne: As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
bwahahahahahahahah nice one seriously, we could just move all the nutbags to texas and build a fence
Whoa, Im from Texas and we have enough preaching nutbags. Keep your nutbags on your side of the fence.
LeoffDaGrate:I think it's funny how, every once in a while, an idiot comes along who says crap that's SO insane that not even randomjsa, tenpoundsofcheese or myrandomname will attempt to defend it.
That's the beauty of it, the apologists don't even have to make excuses for it, they can just hide behind the No true Scotsman fallacy. See the dozens of examples of it above.
Kali-Yuga:Then maybe in a few generations mankind can finally throw off the shackles of religion once and for all and the abrahamic god can join the thousands of other omnipotent, omniscient gods in the graveyard of human history.
Funny, but the abrahamic god has been around since at least 1500 BC. And there are now more followers than ever.
2.3 billion xians 1.6 billion muslims
so figure 4 billion abrahamic followers out of a population of 7 billion. gonna take a lot more than a few generations to kick that habit.
In reality, "Traditional" is code for "whatever things I believed about the world growing up," and now that whole generations have been told repeatedly that the nuclear Cleaver family was the perfect lifestyle aspiration free of any sin or corruption, of course it's impossible to get anyone who didn't live then to realize that it's just a TV fantasy, no more reflective of most peoples' lives than I Dream of Genie.
LesserEvil:12349876: LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
The Republicans certainly think Jeremiah Wright has that power.
So I take it you believe this nutcase is completely powerless, and it would be better to ignore him, right?
I hate to Godwin, but this post is making me think of that. That's the sort of thing that happens when you don't speak out against evil.
rynthetyn:tinfoil-hat maggie: rynthetyn: Can we just stop giving nutty Southern Baptists press? Giving them press treats their opinions as if they're a relevant addition to the public discourse.
And then they feel the need to one up the last crazy thing that made the news as well. At least that what I want to believe but living in the land of the southern baptist I'm not so sure.
That sort of thing is definitely about trying to one-up the rivals to not only get press, but to prove to your congregation that you're as hard core as the neighboring preachers. Southern Baptists compete over everything, I was once at a Southern Baptist church where the interim pastor deliberately made sure to finish the service 10 minutes before the other Southern Baptist church that he used to be at.
I once had to serve members of the southern baptist convention at a restaurant I worked at : ( Never would go to one of their churches..
Benevolent Misanthrope:LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Honest question.
Having grown up in a similar church, I'll take a stab at this one:
I think it's more a case of him preaching what he knows will put money in the plate. He may have convinced himself that he's preaching the word of his god, but he also knows what his audience wants and what they expect from him. The congregants, in turn, believe him, because he's saying what they already "know" and "speaking truth". There is also the sense of being a persecuted minority, and the subsequent radicalization of thought that often happens when a group feels they must band together for security and survival - in this case, survival of their belief system in the face of a world and a Christianity that is rapidly changing. It's a vicious cycle.
If you've never seen the film "Marjoe", you should. And not just the parts about him - look at the other preachers and how they operate.
Fair answer, the preacher knows his audience and speaks to them in a like-minded fashion. A religious pundit (who may or may not even believe the crap they spew, but you have to make bank, right?)
Again it comes back to the idea that we shouldn't care what this idiot says. It doesn't change anything as long as it is contained in his church. If he's shouting this in public, on the other hand, feel free to roast him - but otherwise, this just gives him additional publicity he otherwise wouldn't have.
Punditry is a scam. Limbaugh, Beck, Olbermann, Matthews... they get ratings, almost as much from their haters as their fans, and they all could really care less about what happens in politics, as long as it provides fuel for their shows. This preacher is no different. Publicity actually HELPS business, whether it's negative or positive.
The real reason men name shiat after or refer to things as women: So they can blame women when shiat goes wrong. I grant you permission to ignore that part of the verse.
jaylectricity:dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
But what if the gay men and the lesbians DO reproduce? They could selectively breed an army of super-homosexuals that would overrun the facility. No salon, gym, or softball field will be safe.
OK, y'all, I got a theory ... this pastor and his kind KNOW that their words are outrageous, but they've all signed a blood oath together to be literally martyred - baiting themselves to be murdered - and this is the best provocation they've come up with so far.
LesserEvil:Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Honest question.
Birds of a feather. Simple as that. They find the church that preaches what they already wanted to hear.
So a giant cage filled with lesbians ... There's some serious Werner Von Braun style of sick genius here. Now I'm not advocating his sick political philosophies, but cant' we let him build a few models for us? Just until we can study how they work and how much lube the working parts will need?
LesserEvil:Benevolent Misanthrope: LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
Does this guy have that much influence on his followers? Are the sort of "Christians" who attend his sermons all like that, because, after all, they go to his services and donate money to his church?
Honest question.
Having grown up in a similar church, I'll take a stab at this one:
I think it's more a case of him preaching what he knows will put money in the plate. He may have convinced himself that he's preaching the word of his god, but he also knows what his audience wants and what they expect from him. The congregants, in turn, believe him, because he's saying what they already "know" and "speaking truth". There is also the sense of being a persecuted minority, and the subsequent radicalization of thought that often happens when a group feels they must band together for security and survival - in this case, survival of their belief system in the face of a world and a Christianity that is rapidly changing. It's a vicious cycle.
If you've never seen the film "Marjoe", you should. And not just the parts about him - look at the other preachers and how they operate.
Fair answer, the preacher knows his audience and speaks to them in a like-minded fashion. A religious pundit (who may or may not even believe the crap they spew, but you have to make bank, right?)
Again it comes back to the idea that we shouldn't care what this idiot says. It doesn't change anything as long as it is contained in his church. If he's shouting this in public, on the other hand, feel free to roast him - but otherwise, this just gives him additional publicity he otherwise wouldn't have.
Punditry is a scam. Limbaugh, Beck, Olbermann, Matthews... they get ratings, almost as much from their haters as their fans, and they all could really care less about what happens in politics, as long as it provides fuel for their shows. This preacher is no different. Publicity actually HELPS business, whether it's negative or positive.
Actually, it means we should be more scared, because farkwits like this aee the figureheads for a large number of people who already believe the bigoted crap they are spouting. It's not just this guy, it's all the people cheering his hate filled rhetoric in the audience.
Wayne 985:jaylectricity: dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
But what if the gay men and the lesbians DO reproduce? They could selectively breed an army of super-homosexuals that would overrun the facility. No salon, gym, or softball field will be safe.
Mock26:Oh yeah, where did the first grandchild come from? If everything started with only Adam and Eve then who schlepped who to make the first grandchild?
According to my Creationist friend, since the original creation was 'perfect', there would not have been any issue with genetic degradation due to incest. So, despite 'the fall', even though things weren't perfect anymore, their genes were pretty close to perfect, so they could have incestuous relationships for a while and God was apparently monitoring the genetic situation and when it got to the point that he... err.. He knew that anymore genetic degradation due to incest would start causing big headed banjo players, He said "OK, time to hold up on that incest thingy"(*).
Gwendolyn:He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
He put the lesbians in one pen and male "queers and homosexuals" in another.
I like this guy's logic. If we build a pen and put all the homophobic preachers in there, they'll die off as well. They are so afraid of reproducing after all.
astro716:But do you know what the queers are doing to the soil?
growing flowers? resdesigning the garden?
seriously. I know a lesbian couple in my town that have a fantastic garden. taken them years of trial and error but I think this year they finally got it right.
I usually get a little depressed in the Christian/religious bashing threads. But this is officially 100x more depressing. Living a life that emulates Christ should be an honorable thing...nothing like this pastor's hate-driven derp. Never once in the recorded life of Christ did he condemn being homosexual as being any worse than other sins. In fact, the only righteous anger he ever showed was for the money changers, and I don't see any pastors crucifying them.
I would have made a big, showy protest about walking out in the middle of this nozzle's speech.
Christianity is pretty much powerless to do anything like this idiot preacher's vision, and it's doubtful anybody would ever let someone like him get that power in this country... in other words, his brand of extremism is powerless, impotent in today's world. Giving them a voice outside of their narrow minded (and in most cases, unable to change) cult members is dumb and only serves to give them a greater audience - even legitimizing their opinions to those that might otherwise remain on the fence.
1. We live in a country where a very large portion of the populace believe communism and Nazism are the same thing, where a sizable minority thinks the president was born in Kenya and where roughly half believe the world was created 6000 years ago? I personally do not have enough faith in the American population to recognize that it's bad to put an extremist who says crazy things into office (see: Rick Santorum got a lot of votes, and he wouldn't let his daughter abort her rape baby)
You honestly believe "large portion" is anything remotely like a majority? Why do we need a distinction between the two for the most part, anyway? Nazism was a response to the growing threat of communism in Europe. One extreme against another, born out of a time of economic crisis. Those conditions do not exist today... I'll expand in the second part on that.
As for Santorum, he was an idiot. The sad fact of the matter is that centrist candidates simply don't get the vote for primaries (in either party) like the extremists. AS for him getting into power, we do have a government of checks and balances. Lots of idiots become Presidents, Congressmen, Governors... but there is usually enough opposition to keep the whole thing from pitching into crazy-town.
2. The NSDAP started with only 50 members in 1923. They fed off the fears of the masses (and abused crummy constitutional rules like emergency powers) and managed to get themselves in power to enact their heinous agenda in a little over a decade. Do you really think it's impossible for the combination of the Filibuster and Citizens United to instate some crazy nonsense like this in the US? In the country that had legal subjugation of minority races until the 1960s?
We have social momentum and historical precedence (albeit, too many people are lacking the proper education, between a simple lack of knowledge and those who get a far-right or far-left "interpretation" of those events) to create some form of stability in our government. Some of the worst things our country did will never happen again; reverse civil rights? How would that EVER happen? Every generation grows more centrist, and that is why so many citizens are up in arms over the crap going on; most of us are looking around and seeing extremists on both sides of the political spectrum, frustrated that we have no voice (both parties always refer to the extreme wing of their parties as the "base" they need to appeal to - even though it's the vast majority in the middle of the road who waver between affiliations and sway elections).
Germany was ripe for National Socialism. Defeated by their ancient enemies (with centuries of wars behind them), drowning in hyper-inflated marks, backed into a corner by powers that were just revealing themselves as ultimately toothless, it was ripe for that sort of transformation. Education was limited to the practical. Social equality simply didn't exist then.
America would fall into anarchy before tyrannical rule could hold power here. Even that would take decades of punishment by idiotic policies, economic failure and more impossibly, a total collapse of the US Dollar (considering there is probably more cash held around the world, and it is still universally used in markets ranging from black to legit, I doubt that could ever happen.)
On that note, I'm signing off of this argument. Have a good night.
As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
LesserEvil:Fair answer, the preacher knows his audience and speaks to them in a like-minded fashion. A religious pundit (who may or may not even believe the crap they spew, but you have to make bank, right?)
Again it comes back to the idea that we shouldn't care what this idiot says. It doesn't change anything as long as it is contained in his church. If he's shouting this in public, on the other hand, feel free to roast him - but otherwise, this just gives him additional publicity he otherwise wouldn't have.
Punditry is a scam. Limbaugh, Beck, Olbermann, Matthews... they get ratings, almost as much from their haters as their fans, and they all could really care less about what happens in politics, as long as it provides fuel for their shows. This preacher is no different. Publicity actually HELPS business, whether it's negative or positive.
That sounds nice, but I don't completely buy it. Do you think that the reason for regional trends in beliefs is just by chance or breeding? No, there actually is some social transmission of ideas from generation to generation. Seeing a certain set of beliefs reinforced continually without anyone saying "you know, maybe the gays aren't really evil and destroying our country" is probably going to end up believing the same thing. Of course I don't advocate censoring or imprisoning this guy, so don't take it to extremes, but that doesn't mean that reasonable people shouldn't stand up to hateful talk when they see it.
Weaver95:astro716: But do you know what the queers are doing to the soil?
growing flowers? resdesigning the garden?
seriously. I know a lesbian couple in my town that have a fantastic garden. taken them years of trial and error but I think this year they finally got it right.
It's not a lesbian thing. All perennials will: First year, creep. Second year, sleep. Third year, leap.
dameron:He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
This nutbar clearly doesn't understand the concept of "homosexual". We don't (and can't) breed together and create more homosexuals - it's the heterosexuals that keep making teh gheys. Therefore, if he's committed to ending the "gay menace", he and his flock should be the ones locked up like stray dogs.
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
Actually, you're out of the mainstream because you're a decent person who doesn't use your religion as a tool for political power.
BarkingUnicorn:Gwendolyn: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
He put the lesbians in one pen and male "queers and homosexuals" in another.
But is it a chain link fence? That would present options.
However, with it being electrified, it would be like a high-stakes game of 'Operation'
"Can you imagine kissing a man?!... uh? Can you? Can you picture his strong arms embracing you, and his hard chest sweating against yours? Do you see in your mind his rough hands running through every inch of your body while his warm and wet tongue explores your mouth? Do you?"
Weaver95:Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though.
only with Abraham. before that he accepted blood sacrifices. and even after that he accepted animal blood sacrifices. Christ was "created" to end all that barbaric blood sacrifice stuff. The "church" was losing popularity and they had to make changes to keep up with societal changes. Much like the prosperity gospel where greed is good.
FTFA: The pastor's comments seem in line with statements made by Ron Baity, founding pastor of Berean Baptist Church in Winston-Salem and head of the anti-marriage equality organization Return America, who told his own congregation that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people should be prosecuted as they were historically, and Pastor Sean Harris of the Berean Baptist Church in Fayetteville who advocated parents "punch" their male child if he is effeminate and "crack that wrist" if he is limp-wristed.
I don't see how that would solve the "problem".
I went ahead and looked up this "Ron Baity" character and found his shiatty website, but the kicker was this: his contact info? A farking Hotmail account! Someone should hack that shiat and find his Male Escort dox.
But the main event is Captain Concentration Camp himself, the man, the legend; Charles L. Worley!....
Man that's a lame website. I can't even make fun of it, it's that lame.
Anyway, this guy broke the law since he just electioneered from the pulpit, but as well all know that doesn't actually matter if you are a Republican.
LeroyBourne He asks his congregation if they could imagine kissing a man, then he just stands there and stares into the abyss. I knew exactly what was going in his mind.
Hey Pastor, most of the women in the congregation can imagine kissing a man, and probably do on a regular basis.
God-is-a-Taco:Worley added, "It makes me pukin' sick to think about -- I don't even whether or not to say this in the pulpit -- can you imagine kissing some man?"
They cut off the rest of his speech:
"And touching his penis. Can you imagine putting his penis in your mouth? It's disgusting. Oh, and then his large member would go inside of my the anus. Finally he would spread his homosexual seed on my face. It's wrong. Large gay penises."
These guys really do get excited about homosexuality.
A winrar is you.
These mofos just need to come out of the closet and be happy with who they are.
PonceAlyosha:Actually, you're out of the mainstream because you're a decent person who doesn't use your religion as a tool for political power.
Actually, I would argue that he is in the mainstream. You just never hear about folks like him. You do hear about these bigots, however. Sadly, it is just about every day.
Thank you Christians for giving humanity another example of the hazards of living a worthless, god-clotted life. I think this cat might go to the top of my list when I am explaining to some family and friends why I will never join their silly cults, and why America is better off remaining a secular nation.
LeglessDog:Kudos to SUBBY for the quotation marks around Christian . . .
But, the guy IS a Christian. Just because you may not like what he has to say, he follows the same book and worships the same god as all other Christians.
In reality, "Traditional" is code for "whatever things I believed about the world growing up," and now that whole generations have been told repeatedly that the nuclear Cleaver family was the perfect lifestyle aspiration free of any sin or corruption, of course it's impossible to get anyone who didn't live then to realize that it's just a TV fantasy, no more reflective of most peoples' lives than I Dream of Genie.
If I had to pick a fantasy life, I'd choose I Dream of Jeannie over Leave It To Beaver any day of the week.
For a short time (about a month) several years ago my life was like Three's Company. That was a good month.
However, my childhood was more like All In The Family mixed with That 70s Show until I got married, at which point it became closer to Married With Children minus the children, but with a dash of Hoarders.
Then it became Divorce Court.
Now, however, it's a bit more like Bewitched, minus the teleportation, people being turned into animals, and Uncle Arthur.
/Happily, it has never been like Reno 911. //Even more happily, it has never been like Oz.
Weaver95:astro716: But do you know what the queers are doing to the soil?
growing flowers? resdesigning the garden?
seriously. I know a lesbian couple in my town that have a fantastic garden. taken them years of trial and error but I think this year they finally got it right.
that's probably because up until a few years ago you'd have your dog over there tearing it up ;)
teeny:I usually get a little depressed in the Christian/religious bashing threads. But this is officially 100x more depressing. Living a life that emulates Christ should be an honorable thing...nothing like this pastor's hate-driven derp. Never once in the recorded life of Christ did he condemn being homosexual as being any worse than other sins. In fact, the only righteous anger he ever showed was for the money changers, and I don't see any pastors crucifying them.
I would have made a big, showy protest about walking out in the middle of this nozzle's speech.
A billion times this. The only time Christ ever got furious and lost his shiat was when people were using the church to make themselves lots of money.
Yeah. I read somewhere that Cain and Able each had a twin sister that was their wife and bore children, who I guess eventually farked each other. Pretty gross. No wonder the churches play that shiat down.
North_Central_Positronics:Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on firewonder how deep in the closet he is?
CK2005:teeny: I usually get a little depressed in the Christian/religious bashing threads. But this is officially 100x more depressing. Living a life that emulates Christ should be an honorable thing...nothing like this pastor's hate-driven derp. Never once in the recorded life of Christ did he condemn being homosexual as being any worse than other sins. In fact, the only righteous anger he ever showed was for the money changers, and I don't see any pastors crucifying them.
I would have made a big, showy protest about walking out in the middle of this nozzle's speech.
A billion times this. The only time Christ ever got furious and lost his shiat was when people were using the church to make themselves lots of money.
Hobodeluxe:Weaver95: Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though.
only with Abraham. before that he accepted blood sacrifices. and even after that he accepted animal blood sacrifices. Christ was "created" to end all that barbaric blood sacrifice stuff. The "church" was losing popularity and they had to make changes to keep up with societal changes. Much like the prosperity gospel where greed is good.
You know, I have heard this before, but with subsequent generations white-washing the shiat out of their own history I've never seen evidence. Do you know of any texts or artifacts, apocryphal or otherwise, giving more weight to it?
I mean it's hard for me to believe a primitive sand religion dating back that far DIDN'T, but human sacrifice is one of those things people like to NOT talk about.
Vodka Zombie:Just because you may not like what he has to say, he follows the same book and worships the same god as all other Christians.
I think that you could make a pretty strong case that this guy really does not follow the same book that posits the positive connotation of the Golden Rule as one of its basic tenants.
StoneColdAtheist:North_Central_Positronics: Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on firewonder how deep in the closet he is?
FTFY
Honey he's so far in the closet he has become a hand basket. /Apologies to the original //Shouldn't be obscure.
Weaver95:gilgigamesh: Weaver95: WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
...Yahweh....
*cough*
Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'. sort of like having a big brother who really does try to do the right thing, but goes about it all wrong.
Then there's Christ, who's actually a pretty decent god. his followers though...yeesh. some of those guys either didn't get the message or they're just working for some of the old gods and/or demons and using Christ as camoflage. Or maybe the old ones ganged up on Jesus and murdered him and keep his skinned corpse around as a shared disguse. At any rate, a lot of people pretend to follow the Christian god but don't actually do anything he said that his followers should be doing.
And last - but not least - there's the Holy Spirit. Who gets something of a bad rap. sort of like the silent, creepy younger brother. he hangs around and inspires people. sort of like a muse...he fires you up and then lets you loose to do your stuff. In theory, Christ is supposed to direct that passion to do good things...but given how many people aren't actually doing Christ's work, mostly that passion gets misdirected. so these days, the Spirit sort of gave up and works at skate parks in southern california.
Welcome to my favorite list you cunning linguist you. The default color is green but if you have a preference you would prefer associated with you just let me know.
LesserEvil:Germany was ripe for National Socialism. Defeated by their ancient enemies (with centuries of wars behind them), drowning in hyper-inflated marks, backed into a corner by powers that were just revealing themselves as ultimately toothless, it was ripe for that sort of transformation. Education was limited to the practical. Social equality simply didn't exist then.
America would fall into anarchy before tyrannical rule could hold power here. Even that would take decades of punishment by idiotic policies, economic failure and more impossibly, a total collapse of the US Dollar (considering there is probably more cash held around the world, and it is still universally used in markets ranging from black to legit, I doubt that could ever happen.)
On that note, I'm signing off of this argument. Have a good night.
Too bad, because fascism isn't a style of government. Nazism was only a totalitarian government, a dictatorship of no particular distinction, after all. Fascism is first and foremost a popular movement. All fascism is, is ultranationalism. The mistake people have made for the last 70 years is to try to equate Nazis with fascism and assure themselves that no Nazi government could ever arise again. That's true; but only because it would never need to. Fascism can arise under ANY form of government; and right now, America is more fascist than it has been than at any time in our history. A democracy is probably MORE prone to fascism because the only thing that keeps a democracy together is a sense of nationalism. We have no monarch to hold us together in a crisis, we have no shared religion. What we have is a sense of exceptionalism, of our nation as special and unique, which is what Paxton called "stage one fascism."
The basic elements of fascism are: * A cult of tradition or an overwhelming nostalgia for an idealized past, combined with a rejection of modernity, EXCEPT for a fascination for high-tech military equipment.
* A belief in a nebulous yet all-powerful enemy. A simultaneous belief in the might and superiority of the enemy, yet a supreme confidence that that enemy can and will be defeated by OUR purity and power.
* A fear of compromise, which is seen as weakness; and a dislike of diversity in any form (culture, religion, language, education). This is combined with an overall fear of peace, unless it is OUR peace, dictated by OUR terms.
* The "right of the people" is paramount, and the "rights of the individual" must be subverted to the rights of the state; and especially where the rights of the "people" are seen as being threatened by any of the above enemies, diversities, weaknesses or traditions.
I mean, does this sound like a country you might be living in today? A country obsessed with fears of an overwhelming "Islamofascism" that manages to be strong yet weak; a country run by people who never want to compromise and hate anyone who isn't like them? And who long for a perfect past when nothing was wrong? We don't need to have Nazis in full regalia to have fascism. We've got it already, right now.
TheBigJerk:You know, I have heard this before, but with subsequent generations white-washing the shiat out of their own history I've never seen evidence. Do you know of any texts or artifacts, apocryphal or otherwise, giving more weight to it?
I mean it's hard for me to believe a primitive sand religion dating back that far DIDN'T, but human sacrifice is one of those things people like to NOT talk about.
In recorded history, there is no evidence of human sacrifice in Judaism. However, until the romans destroyed the Temple on the Mount, the carried out bovine blood sacrifice.
Yeah. I read somewhere that Cain and Able each had a twin sister that was their wife and bore children, who I guess eventually farked each other. Pretty gross. No wonder the churches play that shiat down.
Well, when you have to believe that the bible is a literal/factual history resulting in 6000 years of all of universal history, you have to do some serious mental gymnastics to make it all fit. Like the "leviathan" and "behemoth" are dinosaurs. Of course the leviathan is described in Job as a fire-breathing dragon... so yea.
My fav was when my friend acknowledged that we know the stars are many many more than 6000 light years from earth and how God created star-light in motion so that star light appeared on earth the moment the stars were created so far away. I think there's some 'creation science' theory about light-speed having been much much faster back then and it has slowed down since then.
Doesn't he know gay people are each just a piece of satan's soul reborn as man? Putting them all together will just lead to one giant orgy and the unity and resurrection of satan!
rynthetyn:I was once at a Southern Baptist church where the interim pastor deliberately made sure to finish the service 10 minutes before the other Southern Baptist church that he used to be at.
What is the point of that? If he was "hardcore", shouldn't he making his sermons 10 minutes longer?
(BTW - Did you get the Criterion Collection set of Rashomon I ordered off your Amazon wishlist? Have you watched it yet?)
Why don't we turn this guy's position on it's head: Put all the pastors and nuns behind that fence. They're not supposed to reproduce, they'll die out or expose themselves as hypocrites.
Don't Troll Me Bro!:I always hear blanket statements from Christians regarding the Muslim faith all being terrorists because they don't do enough to denounce the crazies among them. Well, Christians, here's an example of a crazy among you who is just as vile as those that committed the attacks of 9-11. He condones mass murder; he is calling for it. The only difference is that those guys actually had the balls to go through with their horrible plans, while this guy is most likely just a cowardly raging pussy that can't handle someone being a little different than him. I'm willing to bet that, with the exception of a few individuals here, this man's sickening and violent rhetoric will not be denounced to any major extent. This is why I despise Christianity. It isn't that one crazy says something like this; it's that the powers that be within your organization will turn a blind eye to it while condemning others for doing the same thing.
1) He's not calling for mass murder. He's expecting them to die out because they can't reproduce.
2) He's getting a lot of ridicule. To me that's a perfectly acceptable way to show you disagree with the guy.
HeadLever:PonceAlyosha: Actually, you're out of the mainstream because you're a decent person who doesn't use your religion as a tool for political power.
Actually, I would argue that he is in the mainstream. You just never hear about folks like him. You do hear about these bigots, however. Sadly, it is just about every day.
Yeah, but I do think a lot of this boils down to the media. Not to get all lamestream-ey, but do you think a minister or a priest would make the news with a statement saying they support same-sex marriage o something? Its just cheap sensation combined with some seriously crazy denominations/sects out there. /they should all make an effort to modernize to the civil rights era at least, IMO
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
You don't have to apologize. You've done nothing wrong, and in fact speaking out to condemn his remarks is a great thing. I thank you for it.
Here's the problem (and this isn't directed at you personally). All the good will and best wishes from the right side of the aisle doesn't mean a hill of beans until you start voting people who are ok with the gays into elected office. Among the steady stream of anti-gay legislation on both the state and national level, when is the last time you saw or heard a Republican take the floor and say "no, this is wrong?" I can't remember.
Start voting for people who don't hate homosexuals. Start telling candidates that their anti-gay stance is unacceptable. That's the only way true change will come about.
Vodka Zombie: LeglessDog: Kudos to SUBBY for the quotation marks around Christian . . .
But, the guy IS a Christian. Just because you may not like what he has to say, he follows the same book and worships the same god as all other Christians.
He is as much a "Christian" as al-Qaeda is "Muslim" . . . they follow some of the ritual and customs, but their extremist views isolate them from the rest of the masses who don't believe in hating God's children or murdering the innocent.
My point was simply that it was refreshing to see a subby who wasn't a trollmitter who felt the need to lump them in with the rest of us who aren't hateful people . . .
The Why Not Guy:Start voting for people who don't hate homosexuals. Start telling candidates that their anti-gay stance is unacceptable. That's the only way true change will come about.
well the old people are dying and the young people are pretty much done with this bullshiat. pretty much.
HeadLever:Vodka Zombie: Just because you may not like what he has to say, he follows the same book and worships the same god as all other Christians.
I think that you could make a pretty strong case that this guy really does not follow the same book that posits the positive connotation of the Golden Rule as one of its basic tenants.
Well, then it's a question of interpretation. But, he's still a Christian.
If you've never seen the film "Marjoe", you should. And not just the parts about him - look at the other preachers and how they operate.
It's been years since I last saw that movie. I think my favorite part is where they show Marjoe singing God's praises on his bed as he counting all the money he collected during the service.
Weaver95:seriously. I know a lesbian couple in my town that have a fantastic garden. taken them years of trial and error but I think this year they finally got it right.
I'm sure they had a hard time dealing with their bushes, but after facing the problem head on, those gals licked it real good.
Vodka Zombie:HeadLever: Vodka Zombie: Just because you may not like what he has to say, he follows the same book and worships the same god as all other Christians.
I think that you could make a pretty strong case that this guy really does not follow the same book that posits the positive connotation of the Golden Rule as one of its basic tenants.
Well, then it's a question of interpretation. But, he's still a Christian.
And he's really helping the brand out, let me tell you.
/Christianity isn't a religion, it's a logo. //Jesus isn't a person, he's the logos.
It will be a great day when Charles L. Worley, along with his entire family, is tortured to death. In fact, I would love it if we had a national holiday to commemorate the date; we could call it "Slow, painful death to Charles L. Worley day". I'm sure Hallmark would love it. OK, just kidding, about the Hallmark part.
TheBigJerk:Hobodeluxe: Weaver95: Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though.
only with Abraham. before that he accepted blood sacrifices. and even after that he accepted animal blood sacrifices. Christ was "created" to end all that barbaric blood sacrifice stuff. The "church" was losing popularity and they had to make changes to keep up with societal changes. Much like the prosperity gospel where greed is good.
You know, I have heard this before, but with subsequent generations white-washing the shiat out of their own history I've never seen evidence. Do you know of any texts or artifacts, apocryphal or otherwise, giving more weight to it?
I mean it's hard for me to believe a primitive sand religion dating back that far DIDN'T, but human sacrifice is one of those things people like to NOT talk about.
Yahweh has always been a blood for the blood god sort of guy, but it was always the blood of anyone but the righteous. A neighboring tribe was never "righteous," nor was a neighbor who murdered a righteous member of the clan, though at least the neighboring tribe could eventually be made righteous by slaughtering their men and enslaving their women and children for a few generations. There is absolutely no evidence that Yahweh ever asked for the blood of the righteous, and anytime someone took an action in that direction that could be claimed to have come from God, it was stated (retconned?) as coming from man's sin; some Jewish scholars believe that the binding of Isaac was actually Abraham's misunderstanding or a false vision.
On the flip side, when times are really tough, people kill their kids. It happened in 2000 BC and it happens today. Although no reliable records of the period survive, things couldn't have been that much different and maybe it was a sensationalized story of even a great prophet falling victim to famine, which would have been understood at the time but is kind of lost now that our culture never goes hungry.
Me? I think Abraham was just a madman, like Joseph Smith.
MeanJean:LeroyBourne He asks his congregation if they could imagine kissing a man, then he just stands there and stares into the abyss. I knew exactly what was going in his mind.
Hey Pastor, most of the women in the congregation can imagine kissing a man, and probably do on a regular basis.
I doubt that, sex for them is purely for procreation and not recreational. At the same time the men stay up late to watch hot caged lesbian porn on the net. It's all farked up. I just had another million dollar idea, a fleshlight shaped bible. Just think of it. The bible thumper just thumping away on the bible.
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
With all due respect, Pastor Steve, if you disagree with his message it is YOU who are out of the mainstream of Christian teaching these days. Not him. Pastors who believe and act and teach as he does represent and lead Christian teaching in America today, and it is a teaching of intolerance, hate and bigotry. You may teach a different message (and I hope you do), but you are swimming against a mighty tide of people like him. Good luck...we're counting on you.
WorldCitizen:Aw, isn't that cute. I know we're not supposed to Godwin, but come on. This guy in nearly every shape wants to create Nazi concentration camps. The only thing he didn't say is that we should have pink triangles stitched to our clothes.
Disgusting.
This. It's like... it's like mega-troll combined with a dare. Even the WBC would be all "Dude, not cool."
If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
Meh. Hell always seemed like a nice place, the way these people talk.
TheBigJerk:I went ahead and looked up this "Ron Baity" character
"Bait-y"? If someone posted this psychotic "let's just make some concentration camps" nonsense with an account named "Ron Baity", it would be the worst attempt at trolling in history.
Do any states have any restrictions on the First Amendment, like they do on the Second Amendment? I'm all for free speech, but many countries, including here in Canada, do draw a line at speech designed to incite violence. Preaching to a crowd of followers for the mass murder of people who have done nothing to harm you, and having your congregation cheer you on does cross that line imo.
I'm guessing the answer is no, and even if there was some law stopping people from using speech to incite violence, considering the relatively rural nature of the community (about 35 miles to Charlotte's inner suburbs) the sheriff wouldn't press charges against him. I just hope that none of his followers take his words to heart and choose to break The Golden Rule...
March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of 1992. Michael F. Griffin was found guilty of Gunn's murder and was sentenced to life in prison. July 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot to death outside another facility, the Ladies Center, in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings. Hill received a death sentence and was executed on September 3, 2003. The clinic in Pensacola had been bombed before and was also bombed subsequently, in 1984 and 2012. December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in two clinic attacks in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi was arrested and confessed to the killings. He died in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings. January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, was killed when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result. October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot to death with a high-powered rifle at his home in Amherst, New York.[10] His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Slepian's murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.
May 31, 2009: Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed by Scott Roeder as Tiller served as an usher at church in Wichita, Kansas.[11]
Attempted murder, assault, and kidnapping
According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers.[12] Attempted murders in the U.S. included:[8][13][14]
August 19, 1993: Dr. George Tiller was shot outside of an abortion facility in Wichita, Kansas. Shelley Shannon was charged with the crime and received an 11-year prison sentence (20 years were later added for arson and acid attacks on clinics). July 29, 1994: June Barret was shot in the same attack which claimed the lives of James Barrett, her husband, and Dr. John Britton. December 30, 1994: Five individuals were wounded in the shootings which killed Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols. October 28, 1997: Dr. David Gandell of Rochester, New York was injured by flying glass when a shot was fired through the window of his home.[15] January 29, 1998: Emily Lyons, a nurse, was severely injured, and lost an eye, in the bombing which also killed Robert Sanderson.
Arson, bombing, and property crime
According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid ("stink bombs").[12] The New York Times also cites over one hundred clinic bombings and incidents of arson, over three hundred invasions, and over four hundred incidents of vandalism between 1978 and 1993.[16] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[17] Incidents have included:
December 25, 1984: An abortion clinic and two physicians' offices in Pensacola, Florida were bombed in the early morning of Christmas Day by a quartet of young people (Matt Goldsby, Jimmy Simmons, Kathy Simmons, Kaye Wiggins) who later called the bombings "a gift to Jesus on his birthday."[18][19][20] The clinic, the Ladies Center, would later be the site of the murder of Dr. John Britton and James Barrett in 1994 and a firebombing in 2012. May 21, 1998: Three people were injured when acid was poured at the entrances of five abortion clinics in Miami, Florida.[21] October 1999: Martin Uphoff set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, causing US$100 worth of damage. He was later sentenced to 60 months in prison.[22] May 28, 2000: An arson at a clinic in Concord, New Hampshire resulted in several thousand dollars' worth of damage. The case remains unsolved.[23][24][25] This was the second arson at the clinic.[26] September 30, 2000: John Earl, a Catholic priest, drove his car into the Northern Illinois Health Clinic after learning that the FDA had approved the drug RU-486. He pulled out an ax before being forced to the ground by the owner of the building, who fired two warning shots from a shotgun.[27] June 11, 2001: An unsolved bombing at a clinic in Tacoma, Washington destroyed a wall, resulting in $6,000 in damages.[22][28] July 4, 2005: A clinic Palm Beach, Florida was the target of an arson. The case remains open.[22] December 12, 2005: Patricia Hughes and Jeremy Dunahoe threw a Molotov cocktail at a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. The device missed the building and no damage was caused. In August 2006, Hughes was sentenced to six years in prison, and Dunahoe to one year. Hughes claimed the bomb was a "memorial lamp" for an abortion she had had there.[29] September 13, 2006 David McMenemy of Rochester Hills, Michigan, crashed his car into the Edgerton Women's Care Center in Davenport, Iowa. He then doused the lobby in gasoline and started a fire. McMenemy committed these acts in the belief that the center was performing abortions; however, Edgerton is not an abortion clinic.[30] Time magazine listed the incident in a "Top 10 Inept Terrorist Plots" list.[31] April 25, 2007: A package left at a women's health clinic in Austin, Texas, contained an explosive device capable of inflicting serious injury or death. A bomb squad detonated the device after evacuating the building. Paul Ross Evans (who had a criminal record for armed robbery and theft) was found guilty of the crime.[32] May 9, 2007: An unidentified person deliberately set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Virginia Beach, Virginia.[33] December 6, 2007: Chad Altman and Sergio Baca were arrested for the arson of Dr. Curtis Boyd's clinic in Albuquerque. Altman's girlfriend had scheduled an appointment for an abortion at the clinic.[34][35] January 22, 2009 Matthew L. Derosia, 32, who was reported to have had a history of mental illness[36] rammed an SUV into the front entrance of a Planned Parenthood clinic in St. Paul, Minnesota.[37] January 1, 2012 Bobby Joe Rogers, 41, firebombed the American Family Planning Clinic in Pensacola, Florida with a Molotov cocktail; the fire gutted the building. Rogers told investigators that he was motivated to commit the crime by his opposition to abortion, and that what more directly prompted the act was seeing a patient enter the clinic during one of the frequent anti-abortion protests there. The clinic had previously been bombed at Christmas in 1984 and was the site of the murder of Dr. John Britton and James Barrett in 1994.[38]
April 1, 2012 A bomb exploded on the windowsill of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Grand Chute, Wisconsin, resulting in a fire that damaged one of the clinic's examination rooms. No injuries were reported. On April 3, the FBI arrested 50-year-old Francis Grady on charges of "arson of a building used in interstate commerce" and "intentionally damaging the property of a facility that provides reproductive health services".[39]
Anthrax threats
The first hoax letters claiming to contain anthrax were mailed to U.S. clinics in October 1998, a few days after the Slepian shooting; since then, there have been 655 such bioterror threats made against abortion providers. None of the "anthrax" in these cases was real.[13][40]
November 2001: After the genuine 2001 anthrax attacks, Clayton Waagner mailed hoax letters containing a white powder to 554 clinics. On December 3, 2003, Waagner was convicted of 51 charges relating to the anthrax scare. ----------------------------------------------------
Yep. Just a homicidal maniac. Nothing to do with anyone in pulpit and in the broadcast booth telling people to kill liberals and BABY KILLERS!!1!
Nothing else. No Christian minister is to blame. No inciting, nothing but good news.
You know, there are a lot of really bad things happening that don't get fundies tied in knots enough to suggest torture followed by slow death.
Child rape/incest The Glass Ceiling Date rape Fraud, Waste and Abuse of tax moneys Partially Hydrogenated Soybean and/or Canola Oil Live Organ Transplant Pigs in Space The simultaneous wearing of clothing of differing textiles Touching men's genitals in an attempt to bring a quick end to a fistfight Abuse of Hand Sanitizer or Hand Satanizer The fact that there is so much porn on the internet, that if it continues to expand at the rate it has shown from 1980 to present, by 2034 every man and every woman over the age of 18 will have been forced to appear in at least seven bukkake films and three amateur sex tapes "leaked" to the public and that every time you google your own name, you make Rule 34 more likely to happen to YOU Televangelism
I think they aren't upset about these things because they don't touch themselves at night thinking of Partially Hydrogenated Soybean and/or Canola Oil.
Well, you know what? Some of us do, and we're getting pretty sick and tired of you all not showing up to our protests.
cmunic8r99:Shiat like this makes me weep for my countryspecies.
Seriously. I don't believe in any of that Mayan 2012 crap, but shiat like this makes me think humanity has already peaked and we're now just circling the bowl waiting to be flushed. Time to let some other species have a go.
RatMotor:cmunic8r99: Shiat like this makes me weep for my countryspecies.
Seriously. I don't believe in any of that Mayan 2012 crap, but shiat like this makes me think humanity has already peaked and we're now just circling the bowl waiting to be flushed. Time to let some other species have a go.
Why? Because we can finally recognize when we (as a species) are doing wrong? fark that. That's a reason to continue existing, not a reason to stop.
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
Thank you sir. I'm a non-believer myself, mainly due to people like the guy in the article. I'd have much more respect for Christianity if more of you vocally stood up for what was right.
Old enough to know better:pastorsteve: As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
Thank you sir. I'm a non-believer myself, mainly due to people like the guy in the article. I'd have much more respect for Christianity if more of you vocally stood up for what was right.
We know that human leaders can rile up followers to commit horrendous acts. See for example; the Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide. On a smaller scale: mob violence.
History has a tendency to repeat itself. The human species isn't so disparate that tremendous evil, born of mass brain-washing and hatred, can only be committed by Germans and Hutus (and Tutsis).
Whats funny is subby had to pick the one religion that is worse than the christians at accepting gays, the taliban would just kill him in accordance to their muslim beliefs, hell there were protests in freedie mercury's birthplace because he was gay but the government dared to plan a day honoring him so a group of muslims threatened to act if they didnt abandon their plans and that was just a day honoring a gay man. And this wasnt back when he died, this was in 2006 in remembrance of what would have been his 60th birthday.
For all its faults, christians are, for the most part, more tolerant than musims so the comparison is moronic. I am sure everyone thinks its accurate but quit trying to rewrite actual events, but then it wouldnt fit the view of religion on fark.
namatad:Hoban Washburne: As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
bwahahahahahahahah nice one seriously, we could just move all the nutbags to texas and build a fence
There's a nice thought, but is Texas big enough?
/Also I have sane friends there. //And a great aunt, also sane. I... think.
TheShavingofOccam123:March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of 1992. Michael F. Griffin was found guilty of Gunn's murder and was sentenced to life in prison. July 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot to death outside another facility, the Ladies Center, in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings. Hill received a death sentence and was executed on September 3, 2003. The clinic in Pensacola had been bombed before and was also bombed subsequently, in 1984 and 2012. December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in two clinic attacks in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi was arrested and confessed to the killings. He died in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings. January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, was killed when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result. October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot to death with a high-powered rifle at his home in Amherst, New York.[10] His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Slepian's murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.
May 31, 2009: Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed by Scott Roeder as Tiller served as an usher at church in Wichita, Kansas.[11]
Attempted murder, assault, and kidnapping
According to statistics gathered by ...
You could easily attach all the white supremacist attacks in this country. Yea, I know those guys aren't religious O_o
Gyrfalcon:I mean, does this sound like a country you might be living in today? A country obsessed with fears of an overwhelming "Islamofascism" that manages to be strong yet weak; a country run by people who never want to compromise and hate anyone who isn't like them? And who long for a perfect past when nothing was wrong? We don't need to have Nazis in full regalia to have fascism. We've got it already, right now.
Yes, the phrase "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross" (actually a paraphrase of James Waterman Wise Jr's comment, "If fascism comes [...] it will probably be wrapped up in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty and preservation of the constitution.") is just as true now as it was then... when it was said in 1936. The fact that 85 years later we haven't succumbed, despite the overwhelming nationalism in the Depression and WW2 eras, and the of Obama instead of McCain despite the latter's overt nationalism, which people instinctively look toward in hard times, says something interesting: You can't sum up the US by the overheated rhetoric that gets thrown around. People will still vote for someone, a black man at that, who sings Kumbaya, can't we all get along? even when we're hurting. Factions can and will try to tug the country in a fascist direction, but others have always tugged back almost as hard because it's just not right to shoot people for disagreeing here. As long as it stays that way, fascism can never take over, since it's predicated on killing the opposition.
That said, the campaign Obama mounted and the presidency he's run haven't exactly meshed, so despite voting for change we got someone who's mildly in support of fascism as long as no civil wars break out over it. Looks like at this point the only choice is between fascism/corporatism and total theocracy, so I take what I can get while I'm still here.
foxyshadis:"If fascism comes [...] it will probably be wrapped up in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty and preservation of the constitution."
Leto Atriedies, is that you? We have a goddamn prescient over here.
I just love people's selective outrage. Substitute gay/lesbian/homosexual in his rant with whitey, blue eyed devil, cracker, and you have an average sermon in every Black Liberation Theology church in America.
No one seems to care about what is said in those churches and if they do mention it they're met with 'That's racist!!'
I don't judge people by their actions or words alone, but more by what I perceive as their motives for them. When I look at the veritable palace this man has erected about himself, I think his motives are pretty clear. When a man like this says something outrageous, he's thinking about the cost of ferns, red velvet, and hotel-quality custodial services. And when people react to that, they're doing their part to address his concerns about all that.
So don't. Don't react. The man is unworthy of our consideration.
namatad:Hoban Washburne: As long as we're building fences to separate people, can I be on the queer side? I'm straight, but anything that keeps religious nutbags away from me is fine in my book.
bwahahahahahahahah nice one seriously, we could just move all the nutbags to texas and build a fence
Dammit, I like living in Texas (although it is difficult keeping the redneck fundies away) so please don't send them here. Perry has enough supporters as it is. Some of us want to join the modern world, ya know.
Kali-Yuga:That's the beauty of it, the apologists don't even have to make excuses for it, they can just hide behind the No true Scotsman fallacy. See the dozens of examples of it above.
I think we need a pithy name for what I'll tentatively call the "No true Scotsman fallacy fallacy" which goes a little something like this:
A: Group X is just a horrible group of evil bigots! Every member of group X is a hateful bigot. All of them! B: Wait a minute, I'm a member of group X and I'm not a bigot. In fact, I vehemently oppose the hateful bigotry that some of my fellow Group X-ians espouse. So we're not all hateful bigots! A: Aaaah! No true Scotsman fallacy! B: Sigh.
ToxicMunkee:If he's saying that only homosexuals produce homosexuals, then I assume all those alleged heterosexual couples producing homosexual children are really homosexuals themselves and should also be penned up.
PonceAlyosha:foxyshadis: "If fascism comes [...] it will probably be wrapped up in the American flag and heralded as a plea for liberty and preservation of the constitution."
Leto Atriedies, is that you? We have a goddamn prescient over here.
Nah, if you go back through the years, you'll see that it's more a case of "the more things change, the more they stay the same." He was just preaching what'd be happening for decades already by then, by different names. Well over a hundred years ago Jingoism was all the rage.
steamingpile:FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
Whats funny is subby had to pick the one religion that is worse than the christians at accepting gays, the taliban would just kill him in accordance to their muslim beliefs, hell there were protests in freedie mercury's birthplace because he was gay but the government dared to plan a day honoring him so a group of muslims threatened to act if they didnt abandon their plans and that was just a day honoring a gay man. And this wasnt back when he died, this was in 2006 in remembrance of what would have been his 60th birthday.
For all its faults, christians are, for the most part, more tolerant than musims so the comparison is moronic. I am sure everyone thinks its accurate but quit trying to rewrite actual events, but then it wouldnt fit the view of religion on fark.
Well to be far I doubt there are any southern baptist in Tanzania. But keep trying , that was almost rational : )
Gay men and lesbians would simply hate fark our way out of the encampment. Not sure how many newborns would have to be raised to adulthood and how many would have to be tossed against the fence to short out the electricity, but the lesbians would figure it out and win that argument anyway so it doesn't really concern me.
Gwendolyn:He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
I think it's pretty clear that he means that women can't naturally reproduce with women, and men with men, that's all. He's dumb in other ways, but I think he's got basic reproduction down, and I think he understand that queers have normally functioning reproductive systems, too. He just understands that a coop fulla hens ain't makin' no more wit'out a rooster, if'n ya know what I mean.
Kill God's children in the name of God... surely that'll make him happy, right? Killed his son once and the farker gave us all eternal salvation... surely if we kill more, we'll be even more saved.
zepher:Substitute gay/lesbian/homosexual in his rant with whitey, blue eyed devil, cracker, and you have an average sermon in every Black Liberation Theology church in America.
... Which will be relevant when BLT becomes the most popular religion in the US, pervades every level of government and begins dictating both national opinion and federal law.
So, approximately never. Thanks for playing, though.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:Gwendolyn: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
I think it's pretty clear that he means that women can't naturally reproduce with women, and men with men, that's all. He's dumb in other ways, but I think he's got basic reproduction down, and I think he understand that queers have normally functioning reproductive systems, too. He just understands that a coop fulla hens ain't makin' no more wit'out a rooster, if'n ya know what I mean.
Ya, the thing of it is... I'm relatively certain that though I'm gay, my parents were straight. I have it on good authority that they had sex at least once.
Fluorescent Testicle:... Which will be relevant when BLT becomes the most popular religion in the US, pervades every level of government and begins dictating both national opinion and federal law.
I totally thought you were talking about the sandwich. I can dream.
tinfoil-hat maggie:Well to be far I doubt there are any southern baptist in Tanzania.
The funny thing is Islam's issues with homosexuality are fairly recent. The Koran itself says nothing on it unless you misread the story of Lot. There's a few hadith that speak to it, but a thousand years ago there was a school of thought that said they weren't exactly reliable since their authenticity was in question. So you had some Muslims, who wouldn't even call it a sin. And then those who did say it was a sin, but that was as far as you could go with it. Now there were some other who suggested various punishments, but they were hardly overwhelming voices. It's only been recently that Islam has come to have some sort of big issue with gays. And that really is due to how selectively certain old interpretations are presented and even remembered these days. You have people, who like the Baptists, insist a certain position is the only valid position and has been the only position that has ever existed.
StoneColdAtheist:pastorsteve: As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
With all due respect, Pastor Steve, if you disagree with his message it is YOU who are out of the mainstream of Christian teaching these days. Not him. Pastors who believe and act and teach as he does represent and lead Christian teaching in America today, and it is a teaching of intolerance, hate and bigotry. You may teach a different message (and I hope you do), but you are swimming against a mighty tide of people like him. Good luck...we're counting on you.
Not so. Of all the conversations of this type going on on an almost daily basis, why do you think hearing about the extremely psychotic diatribes of the truly deranged makes news? Because among Christians, blind idiot rage like this is still, thankfully, still rare.
/Almost, most aren't posted on the internet. Got me there.
Shadowtag:Not so. Of all the conversations of this type going on on an almost daily basis, why do you think hearing about the extremely psychotic diatribes of the truly deranged makes news? Because among Christians, blind idiot rage like this is still, thankfully, still rare.
WorldCitizen:Aw, isn't that cute. I know we're not supposed to Godwin, but come on. This guy in nearly every shape wants to create Nazi concentration camps. The only thing he didn't say is that we should have pink triangles stitched to our clothes.
Disgusting.
If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
I think he's just earning his soap, and I wouldn't take much he says seriously. The other possibility is that he's losing his mind, in which case I also wouldn't take much of it seriously. He's an old bigot with a big mouth and a lot of expenses to cover.
As for the triangles, he probably assumes that we've already got them, and in some cases he's right.
And if there's a God who agrees with him, then it's probably pointless to worry about it.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:Gwendolyn: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
I think it's pretty clear that he means that women can't naturally reproduce with women, and men with men, that's all. He's dumb in other ways, but I think he's got basic reproduction down, and I think he understand that queers have normally functioning reproductive systems, too. He just understands that a coop fulla hens ain't makin' no more wit'out a rooster, if'n ya know what I mean.
But he doesn't seem to understand that straight men and women make the gay babies? So that crop might die out, but more would just be born? Or would the infants instantly go to the concentration camp if they showed any signs of the gay? Perhaps some genetic tests right off to determine if they get sent away?
Electrify:Do any states have any restrictions on the First Amendment, like they do on the Second Amendment? I'm all for free speech, but many countries, including here in Canada, do draw a line at speech designed to incite violence. Preaching to a crowd of followers for the mass murder of people who have done nothing to harm you, and having your congregation cheer you on does cross that line imo.
I'm guessing the answer is no, and even if there was some law stopping people from using speech to incite violence, considering the relatively rural nature of the community (about 35 miles to Charlotte's inner suburbs) the sheriff wouldn't press charges against him. I just hope that none of his followers take his words to heart and choose to break The Golden Rule...
PonceAlyosha:RatMotor: cmunic8r99: Shiat like this makes me weep for my countryspecies.
Seriously. I don't believe in any of that Mayan 2012 crap, but shiat like this makes me think humanity has already peaked and we're now just circling the bowl waiting to be flushed. Time to let some other species have a go.
Why? Because we can finally recognize when we (as a species) are doing wrong? fark that. That's a reason to continue existing, not a reason to stop.
B/C I don't think as a species we do recognize the wrong-doing. Sure, some of us do, but people with views like this pastors' aren't isolated loonies spewing their crazy nonsense from street corners - they're the heads of church groups with whole congregations cheering them on, they're our congressmen and representatives, they're the voting public who have consistently vote down marriage equality laws. And not to limit it to the U.S., you can play mad-libs and replace "gays" with any of a hundred groups some other group would happily see tortured and extinguished just because of their chosen god/place of birth/skin tone.
WhyteRaven74:tinfoil-hat maggie: Well to be far I doubt there are any southern baptist in Tanzania.
The funny thing is Islam's issues with homosexuality are fairly recent. The Koran itself says nothing on it unless you misread the story of Lot. There's a few hadith that speak to it, but a thousand years ago there was a school of thought that said they weren't exactly reliable since their authenticity was in question. So you had some Muslims, who wouldn't even call it a sin. And then those who did say it was a sin, but that was as far as you could go with it. Now there were some other who suggested various punishments, but they were hardly overwhelming voices. It's only been recently that Islam has come to have some sort of big issue with gays. And that really is due to how selectively certain old interpretations are presented and even remembered these days. You have people, who like the Baptists, insist a certain position is the only valid position and has been the only position that has ever existed.
Interesting, BTW any good books you could suggest? It's been a while since I even bothered, I think the last thing I read was Jesus and the lost Goddess about the gnostic tradition and such. /Yea just finally said well I'm agnostic and that's enough for now.
//but it is a fascinating subject, the whole why do people believe what they do
clyph:FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
FTFY.
/ Hmmm, I'm not sure I can totally agree with this.
My parents get a lot out of going to there church, with the support and and all and well it's not a real judgmental one so. And it's not quite a country club or what not but it works for them so.
Murphyr:"Bait-y"? If someone posted this psychotic "let's just make some concentration camps" nonsense with an account named "Ron Baity", it would be the worst attempt at trolling in history.
That was my first thought. Particularly because "baiting" is frequently used in connection with trolling gay sex chat rooms for conservative married men and posting the resulting logs on 4Chan.
LesserEvil:You think Dr. Tiller's death was the result of a preacher speaking, not of an individual asshole who was already of a vengeful, homicidal mind?
If it's not possible to incite violence, then let's get rid of the laws against doing so.
RatMotor:B/C I don't think as a species we do recognize the wrong-doing.
Sure we do, it's just that we don't all agree on what's "wrong". But that's not the real problem. The real problem is that we're not evolved to live in communities so large as we do now. We deal beast with communities in the lower few thousands of members. Above that and our tribal instincts kick in and we start looking in fear at "outsiders". But there are no more real outsiders within a nation, so we make our own. And we tend to look for the most easily identifiable traits to define what outsiders are.
We haven't peaked. Not by a long shot. We're just battling survival instincts that have served us well for the bulk of our existence. It's not the fault of our genes that we changed the rules faster than our biology can adapt.
I don't know if there is an afterlife. Even though I'm not christian, that doesn't mean I've ruled out Jesus/God works it. But man, if they do, a lot of 'Christians' are going to be harshly disappointed when they are held accountable for stuff like this.
I really do think that some of these nutball Baptist and Pentecostal preachers do pose a threat. Could their follwers carry out a terrorist attack? Of course they could, people that blinded by hatred and ignorance are capable of anything.
Southern cities I think are the ones most in danger from these assholes: do you think they like the fact that Atlanta and New Orleans have large gay communities? Or that there's a bunch of pointy headed smarty pants people in Nashville and Chapel Hill?
cmunic8r99:Shiat like this makes me weep for my country.
I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Seriously. We've always had losers like this, and always will, but those on the losing side of history always scream the most in their last hours. So all this is (assuming it's not merely grandstanding for dollars, which I still think is likely) is one of countless symptoms of the kind of change he's railing against. He can't stand the fact that we won, and he's got to live to see it. But his views are not typical; they're in a rapidly shrinking minority. It'll never disappear completely, but it won't be much longer before we don't see much of this anymore.
Theaetetus:Murphyr: "Bait-y"? If someone posted this psychotic "let's just make some concentration camps" nonsense with an account named "Ron Baity", it would be the worst attempt at trolling in history.
That was my first thought. Particularly because "baiting" is frequently used in connection with trolling gay sex chat rooms for conservative married men and posting the resulting logs on 4Chan.
Wow, learn something new and disturbing every day.
Ed Grubermann:RatMotor: B/C I don't think as a species we do recognize the wrong-doing.
Sure we do, it's just that we don't all agree on what's "wrong". But that's not the real problem. The real problem is that we're not evolved to live in communities so large as we do now. We deal beast with communities in the lower few thousands of members. Above that and our tribal instincts kick in and we start looking in fear at "outsiders". But there are no more real outsiders within a nation, so we make our own. And we tend to look for the most easily identifiable traits to define what outsiders are.
We haven't peaked. Not by a long shot. We're just battling survival instincts that have served us well for the bulk of our existence. It's not the fault of our genes that we changed the rules faster than our biology can adapt.
100% agree. Question is - is it a battle we can win? Maybe all the optimism has been beaten out of me, but it sure does some like a lot of people are actively trying to back-pedal to the dark ages.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:cmunic8r99: Shiat like this makes me weep for my country.
I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Seriously. We've always had losers like this, and always will, but those on the losing side of history always scream the most in their last hours. So all this is (assuming it's not merely grandstanding for dollars, which I still think is likely) is one of countless symptoms of the kind of change he's railing against. He can't stand the fact that we won, and he's got to live to see it. But his views are not typical; they're in a rapidly shrinking minority. It'll never disappear completely, but it won't be much longer before we don't see much of this anymore.
I feel essentially the same way. Fifty years ago this sort of rant wouldn't have happened simply because gay rights wasn't even on the radar. People like this know where we're headed as a society (ie - further acceptance of LGBT lifestyles) and it scares them to death.
Theaetetus:Murphyr: "Bait-y"? If someone posted this psychotic "let's just make some concentration camps" nonsense with an account named "Ron Baity", it would be the worst attempt at trolling in history.
That was my first thought. Particularly because "baiting" is frequently used in connection with trolling gay sex chat rooms for conservative married men and posting the resulting logs on 4Chan.
Ron Baity, founding pastor of Winston-Salem's Berean Baptist Church and head of the anti-marriage equality organization Return America, referred to homosexuality as "a perverted lifestyle" in a Sunday sermon before telling his congregation that lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people should be prosecuted, Good as You is reporting. "For 300 years, we had laws that would prosecute that lifestyle," he is quoted as saying. "We've gone down the wrong path. We've become so dumb that we have accepted a lie for the truth, and we've...discarded the truth on the shoals of shipwreck!"
RatMotor:100% agree. Question is - is it a battle we can win? Maybe all the optimism has been beaten out of me, but it sure does some like a lot of people are actively trying to back-pedal to the dark ages.
True, but I think they're a very vocal minority. Just look at how far we've come in only a few human generations. My great grandmother wasn't even a citizen under the law for most of her life. For every person actively trying to reverse our progress there are at least three times as many moving it forward.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:cmunic8r99: Shiat like this makes me weep for my country.
I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Seriously. We've always had losers like this, and always will, but those on the losing side of history always scream the most in their last hours. So all this is (assuming it's not merely grandstanding for dollars, which I still think is likely) is one of countless symptoms of the kind of change he's railing against. He can't stand the fact that we won, and he's got to live to see it. But his views are not typical; they're in a rapidly shrinking minority. It'll never disappear completely, but it won't be much longer before we don't see much of this anymore.
Time to watchCaberet again, what it can happen here.
Maybe you people should have thought a little harder about the consequences of "majority rules" before transforming our representative Republic into a basic democracy.
jaylectricity:dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
Okay, everyone? Go back and watch it again, and this time pay attention: He makes it pretty clear that he's talking about TWO DIFFERENT places -- one for women, and one for men. He doesn't mumble it or slur his speech. How did so many of you miss that detail?
His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
zarberg:His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
I did something similar. Waiting for the response.
zarberg:His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
I could be wrong, because I'm certainly not religious, much less christian, but wouldn't that be covered under "If you would enter into Life, keep the Commandments"? I think there's one about adultery. Note that I am not claiming this invalidates your general argument, just that I believe it answers your specific objection.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:jaylectricity: dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
Okay, everyone? Go back and watch it again, and this time pay attention: He makes it pretty clear that he's talking about TWO DIFFERENT places -- one for women, and one for men. He doesn't mumble it or slur his speech. How did so many of you miss that detail?
Somaticasual:Has this guy considered the whole "bi" thing? Why is the gay thing always so black and white - It rarely is, in reality. It's a scale, not binary.
It's pretty obvious this guy hasn't even thought past gays are bad much.
Also bisexuals are fictional just like ... well yeah I can't even go there. I just fear these idiots are feeling under pressure and there going to blow, hopefully it's in some motel with a rent boy but...
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
I thank you Pastor Steve as it gives me and others hope that there are those who still know the word of God being a message of love and not of hatred. This "colleague" is a wolf in sheep's clothing, sowing hatred and evil. Thank you for still remembering and keeping the Word alive.
untaken_name:zarberg: His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
I could be wrong, because I'm certainly not religious, much less christian, but wouldn't that be covered under "If you would enter into Life, keep the Commandments"? I think there's one about adultery. Note that I am not claiming this invalidates your general argument, just that I believe it answers your specific objection.
Maybe that word doesn't mean what I think it means, but isn't adultery basically cheating on a marriage? I looked it up online and it said "adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than the lawful spouse."
Nowhere in the 10 commandments does it say "don't be gay."
Boatmech:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: jaylectricity: dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
Okay, everyone? Go back and watch it again, and this time pay attention: He makes it pretty clear that he's talking about TWO DIFFERENT places -- one for women, and one for men. He doesn't mumble it or slur his speech. How did so many of you miss that detail?
If they somehow had a device that let them sort people due to orientation, you'd see more of the first then the second, as long as you focused on the younger age groups. Here's a hint, the first picture you posted becomes the second in about twelve years.
zarberg:untaken_name: zarberg: His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
I could be wrong, because I'm certainly not religious, much less christian, but wouldn't that be covered under "If you would enter into Life, keep the Commandments"? I think there's one about adultery. Note that I am not claiming this invalidates your general argument, just that I believe it answers your specific objection.
Maybe that word doesn't mean what I think it means, but isn't adultery basically cheating on a marriage? I looked it up online and it said "adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than the lawful spouse."
Nowhere in the 10 commandments does it say "don't be gay."
Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
PonceAlyosha:untaken_name: What you're thinking of:
If they somehow had a device that let them sort people due to orientation, you'd see more of the first then the second, as long as you focused on the younger age groups. Here's a hint, the first picture you posted becomes the second in about twelve years.
I'm certainly not anti-gay, but keep in mind that the first picture I posted doesn't even represent the majority of straight women, so it's not likely to represent the majority of gay women, either.
untaken_name:Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
Except there are plenty of instances of God approving the Israelites raping women whom they have conquered without marriage AFTER that commandment.
Nightmaretony:pastorsteve: As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
I thank you Pastor Steve as it gives me and others hope that there are those who still know the word of God being a message of love and not of hatred. This "colleague" is a wolf in sheep's clothing, sowing hatred and evil. Thank you for still remembering and keeping the Word alive.
Nice to see you guys congratulating yourselves on be such fine, upstanding christians. Are you going to actually do anything besides 'pray' these people will change?
PonceAlyosha:untaken_name: Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
Except there are plenty of instances of God approving the Israelites raping women whom they have conquered without marriage AFTER that commandment.
Addendum to my previous post: Not to mention the farking giant swarms of concubines that the Kings of Zion had.
WorldCitizen:Aw, isn't that cute. I know we're not supposed to Godwin, but come on. This guy in nearly every shape wants to create Nazi concentration camps. The only thing he didn't say is that we should have pink triangles stitched to our clothes.
Disgusting.
If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
====================================
No, I think Godwining this one is absolutely justified. Uncle Adolph would be VERY proud of this jackass.
PonceAlyosha:untaken_name: Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
Except there are plenty of instances of God approving the Israelites raping women whom they have conquered without marriage AFTER that commandment.
Really? That is interesting. I've not been exposed to that before - would you mind linking one or two? It would make fascinating reading. I'm certainly no expert, although I do find the Hebrew tradition oddly intriguing.
PonceAlyosha:PonceAlyosha: untaken_name: Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
Except there are plenty of instances of God approving the Israelites raping women whom they have conquered without marriage AFTER that commandment.
Addendum to my previous post: Not to mention the farking giant swarms of concubines that the Kings of Zion had.
Clarification - concubines are considered wives in the bible. Polygamy isn't proscribed in the bible. It's like the old joke - do you know what the biblical punishment for polygamy was? Multiple wives.
Am I the only one who sees this as a victory for the green movement? Now we've got the conservatives using electrified fence on two problems - immigration and teh ghey. We just build two fences in parallel between Mexico and the US, and then put the gays in between them, blammo, both problems solved with the same project!
untaken_name:Really? That is interesting. I've not been exposed to that before - would you mind linking one or two? It would make fascinating reading. I'm certainly no expert, although I do find the Hebrew tradition oddly intriguing.
untaken_name:zarberg: untaken_name: zarberg: His e-mail address and mailing address are easily available online. I sent him an e-mail asking him where in the Bible does Jesus say anything explicitly about homosexuality, and to tell him that I'm praying for him to find peace.
I'm guessing that's just gonna piss him off even more.
I could be wrong, because I'm certainly not religious, much less christian, but wouldn't that be covered under "If you would enter into Life, keep the Commandments"? I think there's one about adultery. Note that I am not claiming this invalidates your general argument, just that I believe it answers your specific objection.
Maybe that word doesn't mean what I think it means, but isn't adultery basically cheating on a marriage? I looked it up online and it said "adultery is voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than the lawful spouse."
Nowhere in the 10 commandments does it say "don't be gay."
Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
So if man legalized same sex marriage, god wouldn't send gay people to hell? Sorry I'm going to fight on Odin's side during Ramnorock and win my place in Valhalla.
untaken_name:Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
My far-too-many years of Catholic school are 20 years ago, but I don't remember the Bible specifically saying anything outside marriage is adultery. I know English common law used to state that in the strictest definition. In Hebrew sources, specifically Exodus and Leviticus, adultery applied only to the woman.
The Mormons specifically extend (I.E. add their own swing) on that commandment to say it includes a lot of stuff, but they sure don't speak for every Christian denomination.
My humble apologies, not trying to be an argumentative or contrary a-hole, just curious where you got your information.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwise perfectly sensible humans can come up with something like that may go a long way to explain how religion works both individually and socially, and why it's so pervasive and durable.
On the whole, religion just seems like a powerful human imperative, like hunger or the sex drive, and no matter what anyone might do we're probably stuck with it as long as there are humans around.
I guess my point is that yes, humans are "born atheist," to the extent that a baby does not have any sophisticated sense of divinity, either real or imaginary, and certainly does not possess what we would call 'religion' in the sense of humans who can wipe themselves and tie their shoes. But it's not like if you put a baby on an island they wouldn't get religion. Modern science suggests that they more likely would than not, even if they have to invent it themselves. I wish it wasn't so, but that seems to be the reality.
untaken_name:PonceAlyosha: PonceAlyosha: untaken_name: Adultery is defined in biblical terms as sex outside the bounds of marriage. Since men are not allowed to marry men, and women are not allowed to marry women (according to the bible), then any gay sex is, by definition, adultery. So is straight sex between unmarried partners, so it's not SPECIFICALLY anti-gay, but it does entirely exclude any gay sex under any circumstances, so I'm pretty sure it answers your original objection. Now, please stop making me defend things I don't even believe in.
Except there are plenty of instances of God approving the Israelites raping women whom they have conquered without marriage AFTER that commandment.
Addendum to my previous post: Not to mention the farking giant swarms of concubines that the Kings of Zion had.
Clarification - concubines are considered wives in the bible. Polygamy isn't proscribed in the bible. It's like the old joke - do you know what the biblical punishment for polygamy was? Multiple wives.
Only under very specific circumstances. See the deuteronomy link I just posted.
Dr._Love:Am I the only one who sees this as a victory for the green movement? Now we've got the conservatives using electrified fence on two problems - immigration and teh ghey. We just build two fences in parallel between Mexico and the US, and then put the gays in between them, blammo, both problems solved with the same project!
Mock26:Oh yeah, where did the first grandchild come from? If everything started with only Adam and Eve then who schlepped who to make the first grandchild?
I believe you mean "schtupped," sir. "Schlep" means to drag or haul. Yiddish can be tricky. If you're not careful with it, you'll come off as a schmoe.
FuryOfFirestorm:rynthetyn: I was once at a Southern Baptist church where the interim pastor deliberately made sure to finish the service 10 minutes before the other Southern Baptist church that he used to be at.
What is the point of that? If he was "hardcore", shouldn't he making his sermons 10 minutes longer?
(BTW - Did you get the Criterion Collection set of Rashomon I ordered off your Amazon wishlist? Have you watched it yet?)
I don't know why he ended the service earlier, that kind of petty rivalry thing never makes sense.
Yep, I did get the DVD a few days ago, thanks again! I haven't had the chance to watch it because I've been busy getting crap together because I'm skipping the country for study abroad this week--I think it's the perfect thing to keep me entertained while I'm stuck on planes for nearly 20 hours.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwise perfectly sensible ...
Yea we all want to believe that something greater than ourselves is controlling things, but after awhile you realize a coin toss is just as helpful as prayer. Although your right if all religions disappeared tonight humans would have a new one by the weekend.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwise perfectly sensible humans can come up with something like that may go a long way to explain how religion works both individually and socially, and why it's so pervasive and durable.
On the whole, religion just seems like a powerful human imperative, like hunger or the sex drive, and no matter what anyone might do we're probably stuck with it as long as there are humans around.
I guess my point is that yes, humans are "born atheist," to the extent that a baby does not have any sophisticated sense of divinity, either real or imaginary, and certainly does not possess what we would call 'religion' in the sense of humans who can wipe themselves and tie their shoes. But it's not like if you put a baby on an island they wouldn't get religion. Modern science suggests that they more likely would than not, even if they have to invent it themselves. I wish it wasn't so, but that seems to be the reality.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwi ...
"Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
zarberg:"Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
True it's why I can only call myself agnostic yet still am fascinated by pagan pantheons. What, I love the outdoors and nature so.... /Although blowing stuff up is fun so let's do more of that than figuring things out cause that's hard : )
"Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
tinfoil-hat maggie:zarberg: "Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
True it's why I can only call myself agnostic yet still am fascinated by pagan pantheons. What, I love the outdoors and nature so.... /Although blowing stuff up is fun so let's do more of that than figuring things out cause that's hard : )
Papal Legate in his report to the Pope : Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[7] The invaders burned the cathedral of Saint Nazaire, which collapsed on those who had taken refuge inside. The town was pillaged and burnt. None were left alive. ` Christians, gotta lov'em (Or they'll kill you too!)
cmb53208:I really do think that some of these nutball Baptist and Pentecostal preachers do pose a threat. Could their follwers carry out a terrorist attack? Of course they could, people that blinded by hatred and ignorance are capable of anything.
Southern cities I think are the ones most in danger from these assholes: do you think they like the fact that Atlanta and New Orleans have large gay communities? Or that there's a bunch of pointy headed smarty pants people in Nashville and Chapel Hill?
The Southern Baptists aren't worth worrying about. They've been preaching fire and brimstone over one thing or another for time immemorial (when I was a kid in Southern Baptist churches, their pet issues were rock music and alcohol), but they'd never take up terrorism because what would the neighbors think?
Pentecostals, on the other hand, are big about getting individual "Word's from the Lord" and are big on doing things based on emotion and nebulous feelings. They're worth worrying about because of that because if they get a "word" that can trump everything else. Actually though, the ones to worry about are the pentecostal-influenced conservative Presbyterians. Paul Hill was a PCA pastor who got excommunicated by the denomination because of his advocacy of violence. Troy Newman in Wichita, who has ties to Scott Roeder used to be a PCA elder. As someone who is a PCA elder's kid and went to the PCA-affiliated college, I hate to say it because that kind of use of vigilante force is totally against a traditional Presbyterian view of the role of government (and even against a proper understanding of theonomy, even as batshiat as theonomists are, they don't believe in vigilantism), but there's something about a mixing of Presbyterian and pentecostalism that has produced violence in the past and I wouldn't put past producing violence in the future.
Keizer_Ghidorah:"Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Begone, demons masquerading as men.
I'm wondering what denomination you were raised? Granted there all pretty silly although some are way to deadly serious.
tinfoil-hat maggie:So if man legalized same sex marriage, god wouldn't send gay people to hell? Sorry I'm going to fight on Odin's side during Ramnorock and win my place in Valhalla.
Huh? No, there's no provision in the bible for "man" making laws - only god can do that, apparently. Again, though, don't blame me. I didn't write the bible, nor am I telling anyone they need to do what it says. I'm just responding to requests for information.
zarberg:My far-too-many years of Catholic school are 20 years ago, but I don't remember the Bible specifically saying anything outside marriage is adultery. I know English common law used to state that in the strictest definition. In Hebrew sources, specifically Exodus and Leviticus, adultery applied only to the woman.
The Mormons specifically extend (I.E. add their own swing) on that commandment to say it includes a lot of stuff, but they sure don't speak for every Christian denomination.
My humble apologies, not trying to be an argumentative or contrary a-hole, just curious where you got your information.
No worries, I'm not religious, so I don't take any religious arguments personally. Technically, there are two English words we translate immoral sexual conduct into - fornication, and adultery. However, I'm not entirely sure that those differences existed in the original. The original word, porneia, has been translated as both "adultery" and "fornication". That's where I get my idea that it was only one concept - it was only one word. I'm not claiming to be the absolute authority, either. :)
tinfoil-hat maggie:Keizer_Ghidorah: "Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Begone, demons masquerading as men.
I'm wondering what denomination you were raised? Granted there all pretty silly although some are way to deadly serious.
Episcopalian, then Lutheran, then Orthodox. Had no choice in the matter, didn't like any of it. From a young age I could see the contradictions and silliness of the Bible, and I wanted no part of it. Every day I see more and more of shiat like this, supposedly "Christian" people who preach hate and filth while other Christians do nothing to stop them. If they don't want to be lumped in with the supposed fringe lunatics, then maybe they should start being more active in shutting them up.
Keizer_Ghidorah:"Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Rapmaster2000:So I suppose that once the gays are gone there will be no more gays because everyone knows that straight people only make straight children.
He seems to be speaking from a somewhat worn but once popular trope that teh ghey is memetic, that you 'catch it' from gay people, that queers spread it by.. I guess by being gay around other people, I dunno. So, if you just get all the gays away from everyone else long enough, the meme of gayness dies off. Or something. It's actually not that asinine an idea -- or wouldn't be, if it had any basis in reality.
And yet..
I can kind of understand where that thinking comes from actually. Which is to say, to perfectly stupid people it probably does look like that, and a lot of people are stupid. Gays do sort of spread gay, in a number of ways. I mean, I was credited with 'turning' a couple of supposedly straight girls. (I was even given a toaster oven. Really.) Of course, those girls weren't really straight, though I don't think they were really gay, either.
That perspective surely confuses and even annoys some people. (And I've gotten in my fair share of dustups over it already, especially here, so don't bother, unless you're really looking for a conversation and not an argument.) But I maintain that human attraction is far more complex and nuanced than popular tropes suggest. People get curious. Or don't have that much vested, and aren't concerned. Or are just bored. Or maybe they like that one person a lot. I personally don't feel it matters very much. But the point is that someone like that who's isolated and sheltered is more likely to maintain a default straight lifestyle; wherever you introduce queers, some people are bound to come out, or at least think about it more. That's where the 'turning' trope comes from, as well as the more sinister 'conversion' trope: You can actually prove that gays 'make' more gays, at least through a preponderance of anecdotal evidence. (And before dismissing that out of hand, consider that anecdotal evidence is the sum total of all evidence proving that we're "born that way".)
Or consider the study or two of children of gay parents, that found that while statistically such children were not more likely to be gay, they were more likely to at least consider the possibility, and experiment.
And that's where the thinking comes from that we spread it like a disease: in a sense, we do. It's worth acknowledging that for the truth it is, instead of pretending it's not.
Anyway, that's what leads to the notion that if you could just get rid of gays, there'd be no more of us. And yeah, some people have some sick ideas of how to maybe accomplish that.
Boatmech:tinfoil-hat maggie: zarberg: "Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
True it's why I can only call myself agnostic yet still am fascinated by pagan pantheons. What, I love the outdoors and nature so.... /Although blowing stuff up is fun so let's do more of that than figuring things out cause that's hard : )
Papal Legate in his report to the Pope : Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[7] The invaders burned the cathedral of Saint Nazaire, which collapsed on those who had taken refuge inside. The town was pillaged and burnt. None were left alive. ` Christians, gotta lov'em (Or they'll kill you too!)
Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : )
PonceAlyosha:untaken_name: Really? That is interesting. I've not been exposed to that before - would you mind linking one or two? It would make fascinating reading. I'm certainly no expert, although I do find the Hebrew tradition oddly intriguing.
Lamentations 5:11
Numbers 31:1-18
Deuteronomy 21:11-14
Lamentations 5:11 "Our enemies rape the women in Jerusalem and the young girls in all the towns of Judah."
I don't understand how this is a biblical command to rape anyone.
Numbers 31:1-18 - They killed the men and took the women as wives - while we may define unwilling matrimony as rape (and we would be correct to do so), that doesn't meet the biblical definition, as women often had no say in the marriage process under normal circumstances, much less in war. Again, there's no specific command to rape in this passage, although we could certainly get into a semantic war on this one.
Deuteronomy 21:11-14 - same semantic issue as above. No command to rape, per se, just to arrange marriage without the consent of the female. By modern standards it's rape, but it makes no more sense to impose modern mores on ancient people than it does to impose ancient mores on modern people.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:Mock26: Oh yeah, where did the first grandchild come from? If everything started with only Adam and Eve then who schlepped who to make the first grandchild?
I believe you mean "schtupped," sir. "Schlep" means to drag or haul. Yiddish can be tricky. If you're not careful with it, you'll come off as a schmoe.
untaken_name:tinfoil-hat maggie: So if man legalized same sex marriage, god wouldn't send gay people to hell? Sorry I'm going to fight on Odin's side during Ramnorock and win my place in Valhalla.
Huh? No, there's no provision in the bible for "man" making laws - only god can do that, apparently. Again, though, don't blame me. I didn't write the bible, nor am I telling anyone they need to do what it says. I'm just responding to requests for information.
Don't worry I don't buy into that trip, besides there are much more fun books to base a society of of : )
Keizer_Ghidorah:tinfoil-hat maggie: Keizer_Ghidorah: "Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Begone, demons masquerading as men.
I'm wondering what denomination you were raised? Granted there all pretty silly although some are way to deadly serious.
Episcopalian, then Lutheran, then Orthodox. Had no choice in the matter, didn't like any of it. From a young age I could see the contradictions and silliness of the Bible, and I wanted no part of it. Every day I see more and more of shiat like this, supposedly "Christian" people who preach hate and filth while other Christians do nothing to stop them. If they don't want to be lumped in with the supposed fringe lunatics, then maybe they should start being more active in shutting them up.
Evil wins when good men do nothing.
Very true. /Oh and sorry about the crazies in your upbringing.
AverageAmericanGuy:Keizer_Ghidorah: "Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
AverageAmericanGuy:Keizer_Ghidorah: "Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Begone, demons masquerading as men.
'God' is capitalized.
Not in the post you quoted, it isn't.
It's just an old word for "deity", which shouldn't be capitalized. People just tend to use it as a proper noun when it actually is not.
PonceAlyosha:untaken_name: Really? That is interesting. I've not been exposed to that before - would you mind linking one or two? It would make fascinating reading. I'm certainly no expert, although I do find the Hebrew tradition oddly intriguing.
Fluorescent Testicle:Weaver95: couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
I read that as "Molag Bal" and it still made perfect sense.
Hey, fundies? That's not a good sign.
They're worshipping Molag Bal? Fark it, I'm building a shrine to Talos in my apartment just to be safe. Can never be too safe, you know. If Molag Bal invades, I want to be on good terms with Talos and Akatosh.
Electrify:Do any states have any restrictions on the First Amendment, like they do on the Second Amendment? I'm all for free speech, but many countries, including here in Canada, do draw a line at speech designed to incite violence. Preaching to a crowd of followers for the mass murder of people who have done nothing to harm you, and having your congregation cheer you on does cross that line imo.
I'm guessing the answer is no, and even if there was some law stopping people from using speech to incite violence, considering the relatively rural nature of the community (about 35 miles to Charlotte's inner suburbs) the sheriff wouldn't press charges against him. I just hope that none of his followers take his words to heart and choose to break The Golden Rule...
I've spoken about this before. The freedom of speech enshrined in the First Amendment of our Constitution has no direct analogue in Canada: Canadian citizens are not guaranteed the same liberty, and are therefore subject to restrictions of free expression that would not merely be intolerable in the U.S., but in fact constitutionally illegal. So-called 'hate speech' is not actionable here, in any state, and cannot be, under the First Amendment. At least, not in any manner to similar to how it is across Canada.
Americans may not be actioned even for every offensive speech, even for patently hateful speech, so long as it does not expressly advocate the deprivation of other citizens' civil liberties, or in itself create undo hardship or hazard, or immediate threat thereof. (The old yelling "Fire! in a crowded theatre thing.) Nor, of course, advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. (It's perfectly legal, however, to advocate for its *peaceful* overthrow.) This means -- to take an extreme example -- that we must endure the WBC while you do not. (WBC is, I believe, now pretty much banned from Canada.) While that's swell in itself for Canada, and maybe sucky for us, it troubles me personally.
As others have pointed out in this thread already, hate doesn't go away merely for being silenced: it lurks and festers, simmers and smoulders. Our broad freedom of speech does allow us to much more easily monitor our dangerous bigots and nutters, affording us much greater leeway in defending ourselves against them. But bigotry knows no borders, and there's plenty of bigotry in Canada. I've seen it myself, in some of the less travelled places I've been through there, where rednecks run as thick as they do here. And I've seen some of the same cultural tropes we identify with uptight communities looking for people to oppress. (It took me all day to find butter for sale in New Brunswick -- because it was Sunday. I'd never seen so many tiny Pentacostal churches, and the day before, four teenagers in St. Stephen chased me, mocking my gay bumpersticker. So much for polite, eh?) Most of the Canadians I've met are wonderful, but not all of them. Some of them have basically good manners, but they're not really 'nice' in the sense of showing any real respect. Most of my fellow Americans are more transparent about how they really feel, and I find that a little less stressful: we don't bottle it up, but let it off slowly. Our manners are enforced by social trends, not laws. Which is why some Americans of rather poor upbringing will say that our president is a near Nazi, instead of an attractive and successful Nubian. It's just poor form to say such things in America nowadays, at least in public. But very importantly, it is not and never has been illegal.
It's a tradeoff, like any other, but I happen to think our way is a bit better, or at least a bit more honest. We at least know who our bigots are, because they proudly proclaim themselves in public. I've found yours a bit harder to mark. And I don't confuse polity with good breeding.
tinfoil-hat maggie:Boatmech: tinfoil-hat maggie: zarberg: "Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
True it's why I can only call myself agnostic yet still am fascinated by pagan pantheons. What, I love the outdoors and nature so.... /Although blowing stuff up is fun so let's do more of that than figuring things out cause that's hard : )
Papal Legate in his report to the Pope : Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[7] The invaders burned the cathedral of Saint Nazaire, which collapsed on those who had taken refuge inside. The town was pillaged and burnt. None were left alive. ` Christians, gotta lov'em (Or they'll kill you too!)
Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : )
Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work.
zepher:I just love people's selective outrage. Substitute gay/lesbian/homosexual in his rant with whitey, blue eyed devil, cracker, and you have an average sermon in every Black Liberation Theology church in America.
No one seems to care about what is said in those churches and if they do mention it they're met with 'That's racist!!'
selective outrage? where are the videos of black liberation preachers calling for the internment camps of whiteys, blue eyed devils, and crackers?
somehow i suspect you'll have trouble finding the kinds of false equivalent examples you're deflecting with
Boatmech:tinfoil-hat maggie: Boatmech: tinfoil-hat maggie: zarberg: "Nature herself has imprinted in all minds the idea of God." -Marcus Tullius Cicero
I.E. now that we're past figuring out we can shape metal and blow shiat up, we're all driven to find out why.
True it's why I can only call myself agnostic yet still am fascinated by pagan pantheons. What, I love the outdoors and nature so.... /Although blowing stuff up is fun so let's do more of that than figuring things out cause that's hard : )
Papal Legate in his report to the Pope : Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[7] The invaders burned the cathedral of Saint Nazaire, which collapsed on those who had taken refuge inside. The town was pillaged and burnt. None were left alive. ` Christians, gotta lov'em (Or they'll kill you too!)
Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : )
Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work.
Cool, sounded familiar long day, long night, weird day etc. Oh and you're on my faves in a good way and not just for mentioning some people I like in your profile.
/And yea the tough part is that wasn't even a blip on the things that occurred as the"church" tried to solidify their position, and that took hundreds of years.
WorldCitizen:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Gwendolyn: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
I think it's pretty clear that he means that women can't naturally reproduce with women, and men with men, that's all. He's dumb in other ways, but I think he's got basic reproduction down, and I think he understand that queers have normally functioning reproductive systems, too. He just understands that a coop fulla hens ain't makin' no more wit'out a rooster, if'n ya know what I mean.
But he doesn't seem to understand that straight men and women make the gay babies? So that crop might die out, but more would just be born? Or would the infants instantly go to the concentration camp if they showed any signs of the gay? Perhaps some genetic tests right off to determine if they get sent away?
I think you and firefly212 both misunderstand both the pastor and Gwendolyn's post that I commented on. The pastor seems to believe that gayness is memetic, and yes, he really does seem to believe that if you can just quarantine gays for long enough, they'll die out, for being unable to transmit gays ideas to other people. And Gwendolyn seems, like a number of other early commenters, to think that he planned to pen them up together, when he in fact made it clear he intended to segregate them by gender; that confusion led Gwendolyn to conclude that he thought gays are sterile. That's all.
cmb53208:I really do think that some of these nutball Baptist and Pentecostal preachers do pose a threat. Could their follwers carry out a terrorist attack? Of course they could, people that blinded by hatred and ignorance are capable of anything.
Southern cities I think are the ones most in danger from these assholes: do you think they like the fact that Atlanta and New Orleans have large gay communities? Or that there's a bunch of pointy headed smarty pants people in Nashville and Chapel Hill?
Like a lot of people, you instinctively blame the one asshole up front, instead the horde of idiots bankrolling him. Look at that place in that video: Who paid for all that? Idiots who listen to this guy, that's who. You seem to think that if he was struck dead, or never showed up, they'd just mill around and mope. Nonsense. They'd just pick some other asshole to tell them what they want to hear. They're not "following" him: he's one of them. He dies, another takes over. They're part and parcel of the same societal illness, commonplace bigotry.
Our problem isn't that we have an abundance of assholes. It's that we have an abundance of people who pay them any mind.
In fact, I'm going to Godwin this right here: Schickelgruber was a homeless bum selling postcards when he started. The only thing that made the difference for him was a large number of other homeless bums who thought he was swell. (Really. Look it up.) The rest was just a gullible populace. All it would have taken to stop him was telling him to shut up and go back to painting his crappy postcards. No one ever had to do a damn thing he said, or listen to him at all. It's only because they did that the shiat came down. But if he'd never come along, someone else would have. We make a dangerous mistake in assuming that one man has more power than other men are willing to give him.
Beck, Rush, Coulter, and all the rest, they're not the problem. Who's buying all those books? If they couldn't buy Beck's, they'd just buy someone else's. If they couldn't tune into Rush, they'd tune into someone else equally odious. It's not the few idiots up front we need to worry about: it's all many other ones out there.
We're never going to run out of assholes. But there aren't enough of them to pose a real threat, on their own. It's the hordes of morans who listen that are the problem.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:WorldCitizen: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Gwendolyn: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Gay /=sterile, numbnuts.
I think it's pretty clear that he means that women can't naturally reproduce with women, and men with men, that's all. He's dumb in other ways, but I think he's got basic reproduction down, and I think he understand that queers have normally functioning reproductive systems, too. He just understands that a coop fulla hens ain't makin' no more wit'out a rooster, if'n ya know what I mean.
But he doesn't seem to understand that straight men and women make the gay babies? So that crop might die out, but more would just be born? Or would the infants instantly go to the concentration camp if they showed any signs of the gay? Perhaps some genetic tests right off to determine if they get sent away?
I think you and firefly212 both misunderstand both the pastor and Gwendolyn's post that I commented on. The pastor seems to believe that gayness is memetic, and yes, he really does seem to believe that if you can just quarantine gays for long enough, they'll die out, for being unable to transmit gays ideas to other people. And Gwendolyn seems, like a number of other early commenters, to think that he planned to pen them up together, when he in fact made it clear he intended to segregate them by gender; that confusion led Gwendolyn to conclude that he thought gays are sterile. That's all.
I guess that just goes to show how far we've come that it's difficult to understand that people really believe that homosexuals are all coerced through contact with other homosexuals. It is silly when you think about it. Although to wipe out completely a generation of gay people that's scary.
tinfoil-hat maggie:My parents get a lot out of going to there church, with the support and and all and well it's not a real judgmental one so. And it's not quite a country club or what not but it works for them so.
I actually am part of a Unitarian-Universalist congregation. I really don't consider it a religion.. there's no dogma, no creed, no doctrine, no gospel, no canon... just a set of basic philosophical principles (not commandments) that can be taken in a completely secular and humanistic light if you prefer to look at them that way.
It draws teachings from all faiths and religious and philosophical traditions, evaluating each of them on their individual merits. That makes it pretty much the opposite of "religion" as far as I'm concerned. YMMV.
untaken_name:Boatmech: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: jaylectricity: dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
Because People in power are Stupid: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
Okay so he basically admits that it's genetic and not a choice (at least for men). That's a gayby step forward.
I think he's assuming that the gay men won't want anything to do with the lesbians, so there will be no reproducing.
Okay, everyone? Go back and watch it again, and this time pay attention: He makes it pretty clear that he's talking about TWO DIFFERENT places -- one for women, and one for men. He doesn't mumble it or slur his speech. How did so many of you miss that detail?
Can I be a guard at the lesbian/bi camp?
[webhamster.com image 60x70] Pick Me!PickmEee!!
What you're thinking of:
[www.colourbox.com image 480x320]
What you're more likely to see:
[mulletjunky.com image 371x452]
Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
AverageAmericanGuy:LittleSmitty: If GOD hates gay people so much, how come "DON'T BE GAY" isn't one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS?
Seems to me it would be if God hates teh ghey so much.
Why would you artificially limit God to ten commandments? There are over 600 commandments, not including those in the Talmud.
The road to Hell is paved with "seems t me".
seems to me xians talk in weirdly casual ways about an eternal dimension of torture that a supposedly infinitely loving god sends "his" beloved but doubting children to.
like, "oh you're going to hell, whatever."
and are you honestly suggesting people are supposed to follow hundreds of commandments? including the stonings of non-virgins, shrimp eating and whatnot? I thought the new xian argument was that only the anti-ghey guy leviticus passage was relevant from the "old law" and nothing else. or do you follow all 600+ commandments. get your story straight.
aslo your handle is cute, under the circumstances.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
tinfoil-hat maggie ` Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : ) Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work. Cool, sounded familiar long day, long night, weird day etc. Oh and you're on my faves in a good way and not just for mentioning some people I like in your profile. /And yea the tough part is that wasn't even a blip on the things that occurred as the"church" tried to solidify their position, and that took hundreds of years. ` They're still trying. Thanks for the fav, I guess. /i need to redo that bio one of these days
Boatmech:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Mock26: Dear Pastor Prick,
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwi ...
I've been going back and forth now for some time trying to decide if you're a zero or just kind of lazy, immateur, and impulsive. You've been like the little brother who sometimes says annoying things, but is generally okay and sometimes says funny or smart things. But this kind of clinches it for me. Was this really the best you could come up with? Is this really your considered responce to what's pretty clearly not a tossoff comment on my part? Really? Is this what you have to offer? Because it's pretty pathetic, don't you think?
Jesus, kid, at least pretend to make an effort. Your laziness insults both of us.
Boatmech:tinfoil-hat maggie ` Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : ) Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work. Cool, sounded familiar long day, long night, weird day etc. Oh and you're on my faves in a good way and not just for mentioning some people I like in your profile. /And yea the tough part is that wasn't even a blip on the things that occurred as the"church" tried to solidify their position, and that took hundreds of years. ` They're still trying. Thanks for the fav, I guess. /i need to redo that bio one of these days
Eh, no worries I'm mostly harmless : ) Well it's mostly you like Ghastly so ... Oh yea you're knowledge of history , pretty impressive at this time in the morning.
AverageAmericanGuy:Boatmech: AverageAmericanGuy: LittleSmitty: If GOD hates gay people so much, how come "DON'T BE GAY" isn't one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS?
Seems to me it would be if God hates teh ghey so much.
Why would you artificially limit God to ten commandments? There are over 600 commandments, not including those in the Talmud.
The road to Hell is paved with "seems t me".
What's the difference between 10 or 600? ` These artificial limits do have consequences for real world people. This god thing is a myth
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
f anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.
May you find Jesus before you spend eternity in fiery torment.
` And may you receive proper medical care for your mental illness.
This guy just doesn't see the problem: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
You are not going to be able to get them all. Some of those sneaky gays and lesbians are going to be missed. They will be outside his electrified fence and be free to....Uh....Breed?
DreamSnipers:This guy just doesn't see the problem: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
You are not going to be able to get them all. Some of those sneaky gays and lesbians are going to be missed. They will be outside his electrified fence and be free to....Uh....Breed?
and 12% of the people locked up will actually be hetero. but laughed at the wrong joke or said the wrong thing to trigger the cameras.
untaken_name:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
Yeah, well, I wasn't accusing you of bigotry. I'm accusing you of being boorish. The HURR REAL DYKES R FUGLY thing has been done to death, don't you think? It's only kids who never get tired of the same one-dimensional jokes. Be better than that. At least, don't complain if you're called out for it.
untaken_name:cherrydog: and are you honestly suggesting people are supposed to follow hundreds of commandments?
Do you think the police honestly expect people to follow millions of laws?
lol we have bold face "millions" of laws now that people are expected to follow? rilly?
so, apparently yes we should all be like hasidic jews and follow hundreds of commandments..except for the stonings of gheys and disobedient children and the shrimp and the mixed fibers and all the rest xians find inconvenient and distasteful to follow
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:Boatmech: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Mock26: Dear Pastor Prick,
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwi ...
I've been going back and forth now for some time trying to decide if you're a zero or just kind of lazy, immateur, and impulsive. You've been like the little brother who sometimes says annoying things, but is generally okay and sometimes says funny or smart things. But this kind of clinches it for me. Was this really the best you could come up with? Is this really your considered responce to what's pretty clearly not a tossoff comment on my part? Really? Is this what you have to offer? Because it's pretty pathetic, don't you think?
Jesus, kid, at least pretend to make an effort. Your laziness insults both of us.
/Better luck next life.
` Sylvia, is there anything in that WOT addressed to my comment or are you just yelling at the clouds?
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:untaken_name: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
Yeah, well, I wasn't accusing you of bigotry. I'm accusing you of being boorish. The HURR REAL DYKES R FUGLY thing has been done to death, don't you think? It's only kids who never get tired of the same one-dimensional jokes. Be better than that. At least, don't complain if you're called out for it.
in all fairness the whole "ooh lesbians aren't real people, they're actually vivid pornstars here solely for my killing of kittens" has been done to death as well
tinfoil-hat maggie:Boatmech: tinfoil-hat maggie ` Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : ) Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work. Cool, sounded familiar long day, long night, weird day etc. Oh and you're on my faves in a good way and not just for mentioning some people I like in your profile. /And yea the tough part is that wasn't even a blip on the things that occurred as the"church" tried to solidify their position, and that took hundreds of years. ` They're still trying. Thanks for the fav, I guess. /i need to redo that bio one of these days
Eh, no worries I'm mostly harmless : ) Well it's mostly you like Ghastly so ... Oh yea you're knowledge of history , pretty impressive at this time in the morning.
` No worries ;=) As to Ghastly, 'like' is kinda incorrect. I agree with him on many things but sitting down and drinking a beer with him might not be such a good idea. ;) ` /it's allways 5 o'clock somewhere
cherrydog:in all fairness the whole "ooh lesbians aren't real people, they're actually vivid pornstars here solely for my killing of kittens" has been done to death as well
Just because you're a real person doesn't mean you can't be attractive as well.
cherrydog:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: untaken_name: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
Yeah, well, I wasn't accusing you of bigotry. I'm accusing you of being boorish. The HURR REAL DYKES R FUGLY thing has been done to death, don't you think? It's only kids who never get tired of the same one-dimensional jokes. Be better than that. At least, don't complain if you're called out for it.
in all fairness the whole "ooh lesbians aren't real people, they're actually vivid pornstars here solely for my killing of kittens" has been done to death as well
I agree. I'd like to see some new material. But barring that, at least less of the old tired stuff.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:untaken_name: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
Yeah, well, I wasn't accusing you of bigotry. I'm accusing you of being boorish. The HURR REAL DYKES R FUGLY thing has been done to death, don't you think? It's only kids who never get tired of the same one-dimensional jokes. Be better than that. At least, don't complain if you're called out for it.
Oh, well, I defend against accusations of bigotry. But I can't defend against charges of boorishness because there's no defense to the truth. And, really, it's a bit disingenuous to claim that only boors make use of tropes - literature is literally littered with the "boy meets girl" trope, for example. Also, I wasn't complaining - you were. I was mistakenly defending against a perceived but imaginary bigotry charge.
doglover:cherrydog: in all fairness the whole "ooh lesbians aren't real people, they're actually vivid pornstars here solely for my killing of kittens" has been done to death as well
Just because you're a real person doesn't mean you can't be attractive as well.
of course not. but that's not point of the "lesbians as faptertainment" jokery
untaken_name:Sylvia_Bandersnatch: untaken_name: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Pretty late, isn't it? Did your school already let out for the summer?
Oh, don't get butthurt. I could have easily posted a similar thing if he was talking about being a guard in an all-straight-female camp. I was really going more for a deconstruction of fantasy than an indictment of any particular demographic.
Yeah, well, I wasn't accusing you of bigotry. I'm accusing you of being boorish. The HURR REAL DYKES R FUGLY thing has been done to death, don't you think? It's only kids who never get tired of the same one-dimensional jokes. Be better than that. At least, don't complain if you're called out for it.
Oh, well, I defend against accusations of bigotry. But I can't defend against charges of boorishness because there's no defense to the truth. And, really, it's a bit disingenuous to claim that only boors make use of tropes - literature is literally littered with the "boy meets girl" trope, for example. Also, I wasn't complaining - you were. I was mistakenly defending against a perceived but imaginary bigotry charge.
cherrydog:lol we have bold face "millions" of laws now that people are expected to follow? rilly?
so, apparently yes we should all be like hasidic jews and follow hundreds of commandments..except for the stonings of gheys and disobedient children and the shrimp and the mixed fibers and all the rest xians find inconvenient and distasteful to follow
but go ahead, move the goalposts
What goalposts? I'm not saying you have to do anything. I'm merely pointing out that we have millions (yes, millions) of laws in this country that we are expected to abide by. The US Code alone is over 21 million pages, and that's just national. That doesn't touch state or local laws or ordinances. I was just pointing out that the charge of "who expects anyone to follow all those laws? omglol!!" is ludicrous in today's world, where everyone (not just one religion) is expected to follow many, many, many times the number of laws that exist in the bible. That's all. But go ahead, keep defending against attacks no one's made. I don't know where the goalposts are because I never set any.
2017: President Palin builds the GLBT reservation to keep the gays and lesbians in.
2019: The GLBT reservation builds walls, moats with genetically altered flying crocodiles and guard towers to keep refugees from Palin's Idiocratic Amurika out.
cherrydog:lol we have bold face "millions" of laws now that people are expected to follow? rilly?
Millions is hyperbole. Thousands, definitely. But even the lawyers can't say for sure exactly how many laws there are.
There are over 4500 explicity crimes on the books just at the Federal level, and there are an average of 55 new ones added every year. That doesn't count the hundreds of thousands of pages of Federal regulations, covering almost any activity imaginable, that carry criminal penalties if broken. And that's without going into the morass of state law and case law.
It's been estimated that everyone unwittingly commits 3 felonies a day just in their normal day-to-day life.
Put your prescriptions in one of those handy pill boxes? Felony. Have ammonia and sudafed in your house? Felony. Have fertilizer and motor oil in your garage? Felony. Own a kitchen scale and sandwich baggies? Felony. Bought a lobster that's undersized? Felony. Picked up 2 eagle feathers on the side of the trail? Felony.
ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
engine:ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
/pot - kettle /encourages critical thinking
Well, let's see - ` We have this Dude. We have his congregation. And we have pretty much everyone else that agrees with him ALL promoting this crap in the name of their favorite magical sky wizard. ` So, what do you think?
Boatmech:tinfoil-hat maggie: Boatmech: tinfoil-hat maggie ` Was he the one that said"let god sort them out" when told there were christians in the town or was that another fun guy? /too late not going to google //I've killed more than that in a city while playing total war Rome : ) Same guy - ` the abbot supposedly replied, "Kill them all, God will know His own" - "Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet". ` Got promoted to Archbishop for his good work. Cool, sounded familiar long day, long night, weird day etc. Oh and you're on my faves in a good way and not just for mentioning some people I like in your profile. /And yea the tough part is that wasn't even a blip on the things that occurred as the"church" tried to solidify their position, and that took hundreds of years. ` They're still trying. Thanks for the fav, I guess. /i need to redo that bio one of these days
Eh, no worries I'm mostly harmless : ) Well it's mostly you like Ghastly so ... Oh yea you're knowledge of history , pretty impressive at this time in the morning.
` No worries ;=) As to Ghastly, 'like' is kinda incorrect. I agree with him on many things but sitting down and drinking a beer with him might not be such a good idea. ;) ` /it's allways 5 o'clock somewhere
Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
And well it was 5 on the east coast of the US not to long ago
engine:ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
/pot - kettle /encourages critical thinking
what is this "pot meet kettle" deflection?
i don't even
and wanna bet how many xians and freepers agree with this psycho?
clyph:Millions is hyperbole. Thousands, definitely. But even the lawyers can't say for sure exactly how many laws there are.
If you include all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances (because that's what the biblical 600 number equates to), there are probably millions. Anyway, as you pointed out, even if my word choice was poor, the point stands. Any state's traffic code has more than 600 rules in it, and every licensed driver is supposed to follow that.
cherrydog:untaken_name: cherrydog: yes and everything to do with the point boatmech was making
What point? It wasn't AAG who brought up the ten commandments, now was it? I'm not pro-religion, I'm anti-bad-rhetoric.
i c. and yet comparing hundreds of supersitious laws in an ancient religious text to "millions" of modern secular laws is also bad rhetoric.
In what way? You claimed no one could be expected to follow SIX HUNDRED WHOLE RULES. I pointed out that everyone in the country is expected to follow more than that right now, including you. That proves that your argument was weak. How is that bad rhetoric?
doglover:cherrydog: "lesbians as faptertainment" jokery
I'm not sure how to respond to this phrase.
On one hand, lesbians are people too. On the other hand, it's really hot when cute girls kiss and that's not a joke.
i find it, um, intriguing as well but is this really the thread for hotness?
every single time lesbians are involved, whether it's some hitlerian genocidal idea or something else, some drooler in his basement is rubbing his hairy palms together
it's pathetic and disrespectful to lesbians as human beings.
not to mention tired internet material, which may be a worse crime for some
tinfoil-hat maggie:Keizer_Ghidorah: tinfoil-hat maggie: Keizer_Ghidorah: "Christian" is right. Vile, filthy, evil little worm. Him and everyone like him.
Your god tells you to love and tolerate and care for others, and you vermin twist it into a battle cry of hatred, fear, bigotry, and death. You snip out what you want to follow from his supposed book that tells you in no uncertain terms to love your neighbor as yourself and to judge not lest you be judged, and ignore everything that doesn't fit your little filth fantasy. You obsess with the idea of buttsex far more than even the most nympho bottom twink could ever do, and why? Because the idea of two people who love each other and happen to have the same gonads just drives you absolutely farking insane.
You're backwards savages, desperately clinging to fading customs and irrelevant traditions. You know your time is near, and you're going to cause as much damage as possible before you're gone. The world will be much better off with your kind gone. Maybe we'll finally be able to achieve what the Constitution of this country has told us for more than two centuries, that all are created equal.
Begone, demons masquerading as men.
I'm wondering what denomination you were raised? Granted there all pretty silly although some are way to deadly serious.
Episcopalian, then Lutheran, then Orthodox. Had no choice in the matter, didn't like any of it. From a young age I could see the contradictions and silliness of the Bible, and I wanted no part of it. Every day I see more and more of shiat like this, supposedly "Christian" people who preach hate and filth while other Christians do nothing to stop them. If they don't want to be lumped in with the supposed fringe lunatics, then maybe they should start being more active in shutting them up.
Evil wins when good men do nothing.
Very true. /Oh and sorry about the crazies in your upbringing.
Oh, there were no crazies in my churches. Kooky people, but no crazies. I just didn't feel any connection to Christianity, especially after learning about how this supposedly omnipotent being who created everything out of love would casually throw people into a place of endless indescribably torture for practically any reason.
AverageAmericanGuy:Boatmech: AverageAmericanGuy: LittleSmitty: If GOD hates gay people so much, how come "DON'T BE GAY" isn't one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS?
Seems to me it would be if God hates teh ghey so much.
Why would you artificially limit God to ten commandments? There are over 600 commandments, not including those in the Talmud.
The road to Hell is paved with "seems t me".
What's the difference between 10 or 600? ` These artificial limits do have consequences for real world people. This god thing is a myth
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
f anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.
May you find Jesus before you spend eternity in fiery torment.
Keep your fairy tale, it did nothing for me or many others except cause pain and torment.
Forgetting the vile antigay stuff, when he starts going on about who he will and won't vote for from the pulpit, how exactly does the church that employs him not get a letter that revokes their nonprofit status?
AverageAmericanGuy:Boatmech: AverageAmericanGuy: LittleSmitty: If GOD hates gay people so much, how come "DON'T BE GAY" isn't one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS?
Seems to me it would be if God hates teh ghey so much.
Why would you artificially limit God to ten commandments? There are over 600 commandments, not including those in the Talmud.
The road to Hell is paved with "seems t me".
What's the difference between 10 or 600? ` These artificial limits do have consequences for real world people. This god thing is a myth
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
f anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.
May you find Jesus before you spend eternity in fiery torment. Seems like a nice polite way of doing something you are not supposed to do. Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged!
AverageAmericanGuy:Man On Pink Corner: AverageAmericanGuy: May you find Jesus before you spend eternity in fiery torment.
I'll hold out for a God who doesn't sound like a mugger at an ATM.
Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.
I know exactly what I'm doing. Your god is a bipolar, schizophrenic, petty monster. "Worship me or forever burn" isn't a very compelling enticement, in every other fiction the villain is the one who says that and the good guys destroy him. If your god can't get people to follow him without threats of violence and torment, then he's not worth following.
Weaver95:Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'.
The Bible is a litany of Yaweh's atrocities against man.
1) He had two she-bears rip 42 children to shreds because they called a priest "baldy." Nope. Not exaggerating. Look up the story of Elisha.
2) He drowned every man, woman, and child on the planet, except 7.
3) He lied to Adam and Eve, telling them they would die "in that day" they ate the fruit. They didn't. In fact, their eyes were opened, and Adam went on to live another 900 years.
4) He stopped humankind from achieving its potential by arbitrarily smashing the Tower of Babel. Not because the tower was "sinful" mind you. But just because if he didn't, humans would really be able to accomplish some sh*t. The very of idea of it just pissed him off.
5) He f*cked up Job's whole life on a bet. What if Job had LOST his faith?
6) He psyched out Abraham and his son with the whole "blood for the Blood God" bit.
7) He slaughtered babies and young children in Egypt to punish Pharoah for a choice Yaweh compelled him to make.
8) In Numbers, Israel complains that Yaweh is killing too many of them. So Yahweh kills 14,000 more of them with a plague.
9) In Numbers 31:7-18, the Israelites kill all the Midianites except for the virgins, whom they are allowed to rape as spoils of war.
10) He sacrificed himself to himself to change a rule he created, and could have changed with a wave of his hand. Then he said that anyone who dares question that moral absurdity should roast on spits forever for the personal amusement of fundamentalist Christians, laughing at them and raining down piss on them from heaven.
Yahweh is into way more than just dicking with your mind, bud. As Mark Twain said, Yahweh Elohim is a "malign thug."
NYCNative:Forgetting the vile antigay stuff, when he starts going on about who he will and won't vote for from the pulpit, how exactly does the church that employs him not get a letter that revokes their nonprofit status?
Because - Religion. ` It would be a case of religious persecution and a clear violation of his God given right to influence politics from the pulpit.
untaken_name:cherrydog: untaken_name: cherrydog: yes and everything to do with the point boatmech was making
What point? It wasn't AAG who brought up the ten commandments, now was it? I'm not pro-religion, I'm anti-bad-rhetoric.
i c. and yet comparing hundreds of supersitious laws in an ancient religious text to "millions" of modern secular laws is also bad rhetoric.
In what way? You claimed no one could be expected to follow SIX HUNDRED WHOLE RULES. I pointed out that everyone in the country is expected to follow more than that right now, including you. That proves that your argument was weak. How is that bad rhetoric?
hi i noticed you edited out my "superstitious ancient religious text vs modern secular law" bit. that's bad argument
scads of different laws exist in many different domains of life of which not everybody partakes, so again, not really germane to the argument of every human being following all 666 commandments of the bible
what a strange, diversionary and seemingly xian-defensive approach you're taking here
and 600 traffic codes? either someone reeeeally loves hyperbole or citation needed
NYCNative:Forgetting the vile antigay stuff, when he starts going on about who he will and won't vote for from the pulpit, how exactly does the church that employs him not get a letter that revokes their nonprofit status?
bc that would be an assault on "religious liberty" from the antichrist-in-chief 0bumfarker
foxyshadis:TheBigJerk: Hobodeluxe: Weaver95: Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though.
only with Abraham. before that he accepted blood sacrifices. and even after that he accepted animal blood sacrifices. Christ was "created" to end all that barbaric blood sacrifice stuff. The "church" was losing popularity and they had to make changes to keep up with societal changes. Much like the prosperity gospel where greed is good.
You know, I have heard this before, but with subsequent generations white-washing the shiat out of their own history I've never seen evidence. Do you know of any texts or artifacts, apocryphal or otherwise, giving more weight to it?
I mean it's hard for me to believe a primitive sand religion dating back that far DIDN'T, but human sacrifice is one of those things people like to NOT talk about.
Yahweh has always been a blood for the blood god sort of guy, but it was always the blood of anyone but the righteous. A neighboring tribe was never "righteous," nor was a neighbor who murdered a righteous member of the clan, though at least the neighboring tribe could eventually be made righteous by slaughtering their men and enslaving their women and children for a few generations. There is absolutely no evidence that Yahweh ever asked for the blood of the righteous, and anytime someone took an action in that direction that could be claimed to have come from God, it was stated (retconned?) as coming from man's sin; some Jewish scholars believe that the binding of Isaac was actually Abraham's misunderstanding or a false vision.
On the flip side, when times are really tough, people kill their kids. It happened in 2000 BC and it happens today. Although no reliable records of the period survive, things couldn't have been that much different and maybe it was a sensationalized story of even a great prophet falling victim to famine, which would have been understood at the time but is kind of lost now that our culture never goes hungry.
Me? I think Abraham was just a madman, like Joseph Smith.
Uh, after the story of Abraham and Ballsac there's the story of Jephthah and his daughter, who he actually did kill. It's only a woman though, amirite?
AverageAmericanGuy:Boatmech: AverageAmericanGuy: LittleSmitty: If GOD hates gay people so much, how come "DON'T BE GAY" isn't one of the TEN COMMANDMENTS?
Seems to me it would be if God hates teh ghey so much.
Why would you artificially limit God to ten commandments? There are over 600 commandments, not including those in the Talmud.
The road to Hell is paved with "seems t me".
What's the difference between 10 or 600? ` These artificial limits do have consequences for real world people. This god thing is a myth
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."
f anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.
May you find Jesus before you spend eternity in fiery torment.
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Your bible seems to be different than mine. I mean that in the sense that mine has been read.
At this rate, there won't be a Christian under 30 soon. And good riddance to bad rubbish. Embarrasses me that grown adults still believe in fairy tales.
Do you think when they're eating grapes at the foot of Jesus for all eternity, the Christians ever feel a bit bad for their old friends who are getting flayed by demons for thousands of years?
Do they ever object to Jesus about this?
Or are they so amazingly selfish they just never care?
bugontherug:Weaver95: Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'.
The Bible is a litany of Yaweh's atrocities against man.
1) He had two she-bears rip 42 children to shreds because they called a priest "baldy." Nope. Not exaggerating. Look up the story of Elisha.
2) He drowned every man, woman, and child on the planet, except 7.
3) He lied to Adam and Eve, telling them they would die "in that day" they ate the fruit. They didn't. In fact, their eyes were opened, and Adam went on to live another 900 years.
4) He stopped humankind from achieving its potential by arbitrarily smashing the Tower of Babel. Not because the tower was "sinful" mind you. But just because if he didn't, humans would really be able to accomplish some sh*t. The very of idea of it just pissed him off.
5) He f*cked up Job's whole life on a bet. What if Job had LOST his faith?
6) He psyched out Abraham and his son with the whole "blood for the Blood God" bit.
7) He slaughtered babies and young children in Egypt to punish Pharoah for a choice Yaweh compelled him to make.
8) In Numbers, Israel complains that Yaweh is killing too many of them. So Yahweh kills 14,000 more of them with a plague.
9) In Numbers 31:7-18, the Israelites kill all the Midianites except for the virgins, whom they are allowed to rape as spoils of war.
10) He sacrificed himself to himself to change a rule he created, and could have changed with a wave of his hand. Then he said that anyone who dares question that moral absurdity should roast on spits forever for the personal amusement of fundamentalist Christians, laughing at them and raining down piss on them from heaven.
Yahweh is into way more than just dicking with your mind, bud. As Mark Twain said, Yahweh Elohim is a "malign thug."
` tinfoil-hat maggie Eh, no worries I'm mostly harmless : ) Well it's mostly you like Ghastly so ... Oh yea you're knowledge of history , pretty impressive at this time in the morning. ` No worries ;=) As to Ghastly, 'like' is kinda incorrect. I agree with him on many things but sitting down and drinking a beer with him might not be such a good idea. ;) ` /it's all ways 5 o'clock somewhere Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange. And well it was 5 on the east coast of the US not to long ago ` The World is a lot bigger than our east coast ;=) I've never met him but I have the feeling he can be a bit 'over the top' on certain issues. /no worries
tinfoil-hat maggie:Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
I keep telling myself this pathetic little man doesn't represent Christianity in general, but It'd feel a whole lot better to heard that he'd lost parishioners after his hateful tirade.
Confabulat:Do you think when they're eating grapes at the foot of Jesus for all eternity, the Christians ever feel a bit bad for their old friends who are getting flayed by demons for thousands of years?
Do they ever object to Jesus about this?
Or are they so amazingly selfish they just never care?
Feel bad? They probably jizz their pants (robes?) at the thought of it.
Bullies and sadists love to see others in torment.
clyph:tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Thanks. /check the simul-post ;) //on the moble page, can't see the seconds
Confabulat:Do you think when they're eating grapes at the foot of Jesus for all eternity, the Christians ever feel a bit bad for their old friends who are getting flayed by demons for thousands of years?
Do they ever object to Jesus about this?
Or are they so amazingly selfish they just never care?
i imagine their lord and savior shakes "perfect bliss xian dust" in their eyes to make them meh about their unwashed loved ones burning in agony in a lake of fire forever and ever. not unlike a well-made long island iced tea.
what a farked up sado-masochistic religion. the insanity is endless.
clyph:tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Well cheers,salute or whatever toast you want to make if you're buying : ) I wish I was up to your standards of photography, would love some professional pics.
Boatmech:clyph: tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Thanks. /check the simul-post ;) //on the moble page, can't see the seconds
Um, on the simmulpost (?) well it was 18 by 36 so that makes well. It makes me staying up way to long and drinking way too much : )
RCon:FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
FTFY
` No. ` religion (little r) can and often is a good thing. Religion(tm)/big R is repeatedly used as justification for control over others lives. /a little insanity is nice //extremes are not
tinfoil-hat maggie:Boatmech: clyph: tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Thanks. /check the simul-post ;) //on the moble page, can't see the seconds
Um, on the simmulpost (?) well it was 18 by 36 so that makes well. It makes me staying up way to long and drinking way too much : )
` Missed it by 18 seconds, hmm, 18....36...-(TIMECUBELOGIC)..= -18 so it was a simulpostythingie somewhere! /just popped the top on brew #3, it's not going to be pretty if I have to goto work this morning.
clyph:tinfoil-hat maggie: I wish I was up to your standards of photography, would love some professional pics.
My only standards for photographing someone is that they're not an asshole.
Well I have one although I try not to be one, we may have to talk about this for real although I'm feeling like a fat depressed cow right now. Oh, did I mention drunk, yea it happens. Although if you don't mind me em'ing you later that could would be cool.
Boatmech:` religion (little r) can and often is a good thing.
Depends on your definition of "religion". To me:
religion = irrational belief system that disregards fact in favor of dogma philosophy = rational belief system that is amenable to change and new facts
Boatmech:tinfoil-hat maggie: Boatmech: clyph: tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Thanks. /check the simul-post ;) //on the moble page, can't see the seconds
Um, on the simmulpost (?) well it was 18 by 36 so that makes well. It makes me staying up way to long and drinking way too much : )
` Missed it by 18 seconds, hmm, 18....36...-(TIMECUBELOGIC)..= -18 so it was a simulpostythingie somewhere! /just popped the top on brew #3, it's not going to be pretty if I have to goto work this morning.
Hmm, and here I am on 18 or 36 , wait that cant be right, well it's been a lot. I like beer : )
tinfoil-hat maggie:Boatmech: tinfoil-hat maggie: Boatmech: clyph: tinfoil-hat maggie: Wait what? You just tripped some circuits, I'd love to have a drink with Ghastly, granted I might want more than that but that's not implied by having a drink, um just sorta strange.
I'd buy you, Ghastly, and BoatMech a drink anytime. You've all found your way on to my favorites list long before tonight.
Thanks. /check the simul-post ;) //on the moble page, can't see the seconds
Um, on the simmulpost (?) well it was 18 by 36 so that makes well. It makes me staying up way to long and drinking way too much : )
` Missed it by 18 seconds, hmm, 18....36...-(TIMECUBELOGIC)..= -18 so it was a simulpostythingie somewhere! /just popped the top on brew #3, it's not going to be pretty if I have to goto work this morning.
Hmm, and here I am on 18 or 36 , wait that cant be right, well it's been a lot. I like beer : )
Boatmech:RCon: FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
FTFY
` No. ` religion (little r) can and often is a good thing. Religion(tm)/big R is repeatedly used as justification for control over others lives. /a little insanity is nice //extremes are not
No.
If you need to make up a non-existent distinction between capitalized and uncapitalized religion to make yourself feel better, that's on you. You're still telling yourself fairy stories just to get by. And you're confusing insanity with whimsy. There's a time and a place for whimsy, and if one is using whimsy as a foundation for personal philosophy, one is an idiot.
Apos:*Reads article* Not a Westboro Baptist Church story? Huh.
Westboro likes to congregate in areas where there's a healthy likelihood they'll clash with people who feel differently (and are easy to piss off).
This means "not in a Church filled with like-minded supporters".
And this is appropriate because Westboro isn't a Church, it's a clan of legal trolls who've found an excellent way to use one tried-and-true form of Stupid to harvest other forms of Stupid and in turn make money whilst doing so.
It far more closely resembles an insurance scam than it does a church.
cherrydog:it's pathetic and disrespectful to lesbians as human beings.
Not every time. Trust me.
As for the times it happens, most of the time someone's rubbing things, real lesbians aren't involved. Usually just two actresses who are in it for the money.
And if you're gonna get upset about the internet masturbating to things disrespectfully, you should just go be Amish, though. I mean, have you SEEN the shiat that gets posted in... well you probably haven't and that's for the best.
The beauty of the internet. It doesn't matter who you are or what you think, someone is fapping to everything you ever loved.
I agree. This preacher needs to listen to Andy Stanley sermon on "Christian".
I just wish Christianity would just get it right. Is homosexuality a sin? Most definitely! Know what though, there are quite a few other sins too. And God loves everyone and does not condemn. Everyone sins, so why do we insist to call one group of sinners out over others? Just doesn't make sense.
Also, I have a feeling that this preachers has some homesexual tendencies. He who yells the loudest, usually is guilty.
pastorsteve:As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
Why not reach out to this pastor and share your disappointment?
RCon:Boatmech: RCon: FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
FTFY
` No. ` religion (little r) can and often is a good thing. Religion(tm)/big R is repeatedly used as justification for control over others lives. /a little insanity is nice //extremes are not
No.
If you need to make up a non-existent distinction between capitalized and uncapitalized religion to make yourself feel better, that's on you.
` The distinctions are there for a reason. `
You're still telling yourself fairy stories just to get by. ` You don't know me very well, do you? ` And you're confusing insanity with whimsy. There's a time and a place for whimsy, and if one is using whimsy as a foundation for personal philosophy, one is an idiot. ` Yes, I do believe a certain 'one' is an idiot. ` /beer runs @~7am are always fun
itsfullofstars:pastorsteve: As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
Why not reach out to this pastor and share your disappointment?
LesserEvil:12349876: LesserEvil: Just curious, those Farkers here who believe this guy is worse than Osama Bin-Laden: Do you think his audience are sheep, and believe everything he says? Does this preacher have the power to sway his "mob" to think the same way he does, to hate gays enough to pen them up? To blame them for whatever of the country's ills, this idiot preacher claims?
The Republicans certainly think Jeremiah Wright has that power.
So I take it you believe this nutcase is completely powerless, and it would be better to ignore him, right?
So which group of people did Wright call to be condemned to genocide?
/not that killing gays is genocide, there will still be gays in the future, I just don't have a better word.
Allen. The end. These preachers are gay. Or at least, worthy of a brick in the ass. Time to start offing these fevered egos. I mean, metaphorically, rite??? /is it legal to call for genocide? `
Boatmech:fustanella Please don't feed the Christer troll. why? Allen. The end. These preachers are gay. Or at least, worthy of a brick in the ass. Time to start offing these fevered egos. I mean, metaphorically, rite??? /is it legal to call for genocide? ` no.
Just checking...I mean, there's free speech, but DAMN you gotta think about chronic assholism...wait...calling for genocide is illegal???
LesserEvil:Christianity is pretty much powerless to do anything like this idiot preacher's vision
And therefore is seeking to aggregate power so it can. Don't fool yourself: remember that these sermons were being given specifically to encourage political activism amongst the sheep. Thinking that it can't happen here is extremely shortsighted.
Allen. The end.:Boatmech: fustanella Please don't feed the Christer troll. why? Allen. The end. These preachers are gay. Or at least, worthy of a brick in the ass. Time to start offing these fevered egos. I mean, metaphorically, rite??? /is it legal to call for genocide? ` no.
Just checking...I mean, there's free speech, but DAMN you gotta think about chronic assholism...wait...calling for genocide is illegal???
` Kinda, yeah, sorta that whole Geneva Convention thing. ` Gonna thread jack and throw down some Ben Franklin quotes. ` Benjamin Franklin quotes: No man's life, liberty or fortune is safe while our legislature is in session. Benjamin Franklin quotes: Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. Benjamin Franklin quotes: Moderation in all things -- including moderation. Benjamin Franklin quotes: That is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay no one. Benjamin Franklin quotes: Our Constitution is in actual operation; everything appears to promise that it will last; but in this world nothing is certain but death and taxes. Benjamin Franklin quotes: All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it. Benjamin Franklin quotes: As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of Morals and his Religion, as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes; and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubts as to his divinity. Benjamin Franklin quotes: Plough deep while sluggards sleep. ` Davy Crockett : "Congress allows lemonade to the members and has it charged under the head of stationery - I move also that whiskey be allowed under the item of fuel. For bitters I can suck away at a noggin of aquafortis, sweetened with brimstone, stirred with a lightning rod, and skimmed with a hurricane. I've soaked my head and shoulders in Salt River, so much that I'm always corned. I can walk like an ox, run like a fox, swim like an eel, yell like an Indian, fight like a devil, spout like an earthquake, make love like a mad bull, and swallow a Mexican whole without choking if you butter his head and pin his ears back." One of Crockett's sayings . . \thread jack off
Joke time: Two lesbians and two gays have a race from New York to San Fransico. Who wins? The lesbians: They would be doing 69 while the gays were still home packing their shiat.
(alternate version: The lesbians would be off lickety-split...)
Unfortunately, some of my own family would agree with this preacher, and one of my sisters in particular would go even farther. She'd be happy to throw in all the "illegal immigrants, non-Christians, non-whites, and liberals" into those electric pens, as well.
Being a Wiccan who is politically on the Liberal side of the fence, you can imagine my sister and I don't really talk much. Fine by me, I'm not one for hanging out with 'Christian Identity' scum, anyway. A few other family members of mine that are far-Right aren't quite as bad, but we still don't get along. I wish them a Happy Birthday, they tell me they'll 'pray for me' in return.
Makes me wonder if I was adopted, or just somehow managed to avoid all the derp-genes? Regardless, people like this preacher make me sick.
Nadie_AZ:Countdown til he's caught in bed with a GOP 'family rights' politician ...
Yep. Set your stopwatch, folks.
It's proverbial, just as Hitch says:
"he will be discovered down on his weary and well-worn old knees in some dreary motel or latrine, with an expired Visa card, having tried to pay well over the odds to be peed upon by some Apache transvestite."
Weaver95:WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
I always assume that anyone who says "god" and is preaching fire and brimstone means Moloch, and anyone who says "god" and is preaching prosperity gospel means Mammon. For you can tell which god a man worships not by the name he uses but the symbols he invokes when he worships and speaks of it.
Boatmech:Davy Crockett : "Congress allows lemonade to the members and has it charged under the head of stationery - I move also that whiskey be allowed under the item of fuel. For bitters I can suck away at a noggin of aquafortis, sweetened with brimstone, stirred with a lightning rod, and skimmed with a hurricane. I've soaked my head and shoulders in Salt River, so much that I'm always corned. I can walk like an ox, run like a fox, swim like an eel, yell like an Indian, fight like a devil, spout like an earthquake, make love like a mad bull, and swallow a Mexican whole without choking if you butter his head and pin his ears back." One of Crockett's sayings
Coming on a Bicycle:I_C_Weener: Feed him to the lions. If he lives, then God wants us to do this to the gays. If he dies, then he was a false prophet. Let God decide.
How utterly refined and medieval of you, you magnificent bastard!
Can I be put on the lesbian side of the fence? And when its time to build my tombstone, can you please put "I never thought I'd die this way, but I had always really hoped.." And also instruct the coroner not to try to remove the smile from my face, or the permanent bulge in my pants... Kthx
propasaurus:dameron: He continues: "Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can't get out...and you know what, in a few years, they'll die out...do you know why? They can't reproduce!"
So, it's genetic then?
You know what, though? If you put all the heterosexual males inside in electrified pen, they would reproduce!
Maybe the ones engineered with amphibian DNA. /what, it was the -saurus in your handle that had me thinking Jurassic Park.
untaken_name:PonceAlyosha: untaken_name: Really? That is interesting. I've not been exposed to that before - would you mind linking one or two? It would make fascinating reading. I'm certainly no expert, although I do find the Hebrew tradition oddly intriguing.
Lamentations 5:11
Numbers 31:1-18
Deuteronomy 21:11-14
Lamentations 5:11 "Our enemies rape the women in Jerusalem and the young girls in all the towns of Judah."
I don't understand how this is a biblical command to rape anyone.
Numbers 31:1-18 - They killed the men and took the women as wives - while we may define unwilling matrimony as rape (and we would be correct to do so), that doesn't meet the biblical definition, as women often had no say in the marriage process under normal circumstances, much less in war. Again, there's no specific command to rape in this passage, although we could certainly get into a semantic war on this one.
Deuteronomy 21:11-14 - same semantic issue as above. No command to rape, per se, just to arrange marriage without the consent of the female. By modern standards it's rape, but it makes no more sense to impose modern mores on ancient people than it does to impose ancient mores on modern people.
If there were a God, there would be no difference between ancient mores and modern mores. They'd have been enlightened through contact with a benevolent and wise superior being. That they were not, well, you can draw your own conclusions, or choose to ignore it and worship a deity that is less enlightened, less compassionate, and less just than yourself.
chaotey:Weaver95: WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
I always assume that anyone who says "god" and is preaching fire and brimstone means Moloch, and anyone who says "god" and is preaching prosperity gospel means Mammon. For you can tell which god a man worships not by the name he uses but the symbols he invokes when he worships and speaks of it.
chaotey:Weaver95: WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
I always assume that anyone who says "god" and is preaching fire and brimstone means Moloch, and anyone who says "god" and is preaching prosperity gospel means Mammon. For you can tell which god a man worships not by the name he uses but the symbols he invokes when he worships and speaks of it.
Where is the god of tits and wine?
Pretty sure that's the FSM, what with the stripper factory and the beer volcano. I'm sure there's a subcult with a wine geyser or something...
Allen. The end.:Boatmech: Davy Crockett : "Congress allows lemonade to the members and has it charged under the head of stationery - I move also that whiskey be allowed under the item of fuel. For bitters I can suck away at a noggin of aquafortis, sweetened with brimstone, stirred with a lightning rod, and skimmed with a hurricane. I've soaked my head and shoulders in Salt River, so much that I'm always corned. I can walk like an ox, run like a fox, swim like an eel, yell like an Indian, fight like a devil, spout like an earthquake, make love like a mad bull, and swallow a Mexican whole without choking if you butter his head and pin his ears back." One of Crockett's sayings
Groovy! Anything with the word "noggin" in it...
` I'm kinda fond of hot buttered mexicans myself /come to think of it I would be really fond of hot buttered mexican lesbians with chocolate syrup and whipped cream //but that's not important right now
LesserEvil:Submitter: "Christian" pastor calls for gays to be imprisoned in an electrified pen until they die. A Taliban spokesman commented: "Seriously? Don't you think that's a bit over-the-top?"
The Taliban would probably say it's over the top, sure... because why waste all that land when you can just line them up along a ditch and spray AK-47 rounds at them.
Even scarier: The Taliban actually control places with people, unlike this idiot preacher. Not only do they have the power to do this, but they DO do this.
See also: Wahabi Salafism in Saudi Arabia and other emirates.
Christianity is pretty much powerless to do anything like this idiot preacher's vision, and it's doubtful anybody would ever let someone like him get that power in this country... in other words, his brand of extremism is powerless, impotent in today's world. Giving them a voice outside of their narrow minded (and in most cases, unable to change) cult members is dumb and only serves to give them a greater audience - even legitimizing their opinions to those that might otherwise remain on the fence.
Worry more about the jackass extremists who kill people DAILY for their beliefs or biology (race, orientation, sex) RIGHT NOW.
There is something to be said about making a big deal about this if only to shame and ostracize the preacher and any sympathetic followers. These sorts of people tend to organize and actually put some of their ideas into practice if they feel safe and unbothered in their sick echo chamber.
Weaver95:Yahweh wimped out at the last minute though. I think he was more into dicking with your mind then actually being 'evil'. sort of like having a big brother who really does try to do the right thing, but goes about it all wrong.
"Whatever/whoever emerges and comes out of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the people of Ammon, shall surely be God's, and I shall sacrifice him/her/it as a burnt offering."[1] (Judges 11:31 - Note the Greek term for burnt offering is actually "holocaust" though the Hebrew עלה, `olah is derived from "ascention").
"Jephtha's Rash Vow" (1807), by James Gundee & M. Jones, London. From an English edition of Flavius Josephus's works. The victorious Jephthah is met on his return by his daughter, his only child. Jephthah tears his clothes and cries, "Alas, my daughter! You have brought me very low!" but is bound by his vow: "I have given my word to God, and I cannot go back on it." (Judges 11:35). The girl asks for two months' grace, "... that I may go down on the mountains ... and bewail my virginity" (Judges 11:37). And so Jephthah "carried out his vow with her which he had vowed" (Judges 11:39). The story ends by recounting how "the daughters of Israel went four days each year to celebrate about[2] the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite" (Judges 11:40).
Boatmech:Nightmaretony: pastorsteve: As a Christian pastor, I want to express my deep regret for this inexpressibly hideous thing that was said by a colleague - however out of the mainstream of Christian teaching he is. I am sorry.
I thank you Pastor Steve as it gives me and others hope that there are those who still know the word of God being a message of love and not of hatred. This "colleague" is a wolf in sheep's clothing, sowing hatred and evil. Thank you for still remembering and keeping the Word alive.
Nice to see you guys congratulating yourselves on be such fine, upstanding christians. Are you going to actually do anything besides 'pray' these people will change?
Ah, Boatmech. You misjudged me something fierce on that one. For what it be worth, my favorite bible passage is Ezekiel 23:20. Look it up sometime. And I claim responsibility for this, something no church going hypocrite type would ever do: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiB9_FZ-6-s
//yes, arcade game designer with a twisted sense of humor
He made three very political statements in his sermon: He was disappointed in the president's decision to support gay marriage, that he would "not vote for a baby killer and a homosexual", and that he could not get his internment plan through the congress. Can we sic the IRS on him for political campaigning while representing a tax-exempt organization, please?
untaken_name:cherrydog: lol we have bold face "millions" of laws now that people are expected to follow? rilly?
so, apparently yes we should all be like hasidic jews and follow hundreds of commandments..except for the stonings of gheys and disobedient children and the shrimp and the mixed fibers and all the rest xians find inconvenient and distasteful to follow
but go ahead, move the goalposts
What goalposts? I'm not saying you have to do anything. I'm merely pointing out that we have millions (yes, millions) of laws in this country that we are expected to abide by. The US Code alone is over 21 million pages, and that's just national. That doesn't touch state or local laws or ordinances. I was just pointing out that the charge of "who expects anyone to follow all those laws? omglol!!" is ludicrous in today's world, where everyone (not just one religion) is expected to follow many, many, many times the number of laws that exist in the bible. That's all. But go ahead, keep defending against attacks no one's made. I don't know where the goalposts are because I never set any.
If you're going to press this, you need to explain what a given specific 'law' is, and how to tell them apart from each other. Yes, the U.S.C. is very long. But how many individual 'laws' does it really contain? Is a 'law' an Act of Congress? Some are only one paragraph, or even only one sentence. Others are hundreds of pages. If an Act only modifies an existing part of the Code (and most of them do), is that two laws, or one? I've spend the better part of the last fifteen years lobbying on media issues, mostly radio. Yet everything I deal with is under Title 47. That's a lengthy Title, but is it one law, or many?
Here's how I suggest looking at it: All laws, at some point, must point to some crime. Federal law currently describes around 4500 more or less discrete classified actionable infractions ('crimes'). That's hardly "millions," I'm afraid. And really, most people will never come close to committing most of them. (And can't: Some crimes are corporate crimes, for example, and a corporation, no matter how douchy, will never get pulled over for DUI.) The vast majority fall under 'common sense' principles such as not hitting or hurting people, stealing, and so on. We have them not because people need to be told, but because we need to know what to do when people do it anyway. It's not like there are 4500 things you could get in trouble for that you don't know about or might do accidentally.
You can make a fair argument that other levels of government add more laws, but it's not millions more, and they're all technically subsidiary to federal law. At most, a given citizen under an unusual burden of law might have a few thousand things they might ever need to be aware of or concerned with in their own right. And I'd bet it's much fewer than that, since most crimes are not within the sphere of most people's environment, activities, or proclivities.
spiral_fishcake:He made three very political statements in his sermon: He was disappointed in the president's decision to support gay marriage, that he would "not vote for a baby killer and a homosexual", and that he could not get his internment plan through the congress. Can we sic the IRS on him for political campaigning while representing a tax-exempt organization, please?
NYCNative: Forgetting the vile antigay stuff, when he starts going on about who he will and won't vote for from the pulpit, how exactly does the church that employs him not get a letter that revokes their nonprofit status? Because - Religion. ` It would be a case of religious persecution and a clear violation of his God given right to influence politics from the pulpit.
doglover:cherrydog: it's pathetic and disrespectful to lesbians as human beings.
Not every time. Trust me.
As for the times it happens, most of the time someone's rubbing things, real lesbians aren't involved. Usually just two actresses who are in it for the money.
And if you're gonna get upset about the internet masturbating to things disrespectfully, you should just go be Amish, though. I mean, have you SEEN the shiat that gets posted in... well you probably haven't and that's for the best.
The beauty of the internet. It doesn't matter who you are or what you think, someone is fapping to everything you ever loved.
it seems you're deliberately missing my points, but whatever
engine:ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
/pot - kettle /encourages critical thinking
To play out your rhetorical question, how could we know? Where is Christ's official spokesman, to clear things up for us? If you were to press this guy on it, do you think he'd say, "Aw shucks, I was just messin' witcha, son. Christ ain't like that at all. I was having a bad day, that's all." You could line up a whole lot of other clergy to say he's in the wrong, but how is their view more valid than his? Is it the sheer force of numbers? (My old Budweiser argument.) Or is it because they seem like nicer people? What if the old goat is right, and they're all wrong. How could we know for sure?
This is the problem with religions like Christianity. So much is up for grabs, and can't be nailed down (no pun intended), that it's pretty much impossible for any one person to definitely claim whole and correct knowledge. Hence the countless denominations and petty squabbles (like the old Two Baptists on a Bridge joke), the endless public debate over which precepts of the divine should be reflected in civil law, what's "moral" and "decent" and on and on and on. This is why atheists seem so intolerant and impatient about it: From their perspective, it's a roomful of teenagers fighting over which Batman is the best one, what's canon or not, and OMG who cares, SHUT UP all of you!
Yeah, the guy's a tool. But it's entirely fair to ask who he speaks for.
WorldCitizen:Aw, isn't that cute. I know we're not supposed to Godwin, but come on. This guy in nearly every shape wants to create Nazi concentration camps. The only thing he didn't say is that we should have pink triangles stitched to our clothes.
Disgusting.
If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
As a Christian, I wouldn't set foot in that man's church or any of the other churches pastored by the people in that list of hateful, asinine, disgusting remarks by so-called "Christians" below the actual article unless it was to point out the following:
'And behold, a certain lawyer stood up and tested Him, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?"
He said to him, "What is written in the law? What is your reading of it?"
So he answered and said, " 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind,' and 'your neighbor as yourself.'"
And He said to him, "You have answered rightly; do this and you will live."'
'"A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another."'
'If someone says, "I love God," and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?'
Nowhere does it say, "love only the people who agree with you." Not one single time. These people are NOT Christians and they do not serve God with their hate.
cherrydog:engine: ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
/pot - kettle /encourages critical thinking
what is this "pot meet kettle" deflection?
i don't even
and wanna bet how many xians and freepers agree with this psycho?
Enough to pay for that huge pretty church, apparently.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:engine: ok seriously? Does anyone believe this dude is actually representing Christ? Seriously... Or does every self proclaimed skeptic lose the ability to think critically when they find a "reality" that suits their agenda.
/pot - kettle /encourages critical thinking
To play out your rhetorical question, how could we know? Where is Christ's official spokesman, to clear things up for us? If you were to press this guy on it, do you think he'd say, "Aw shucks, I was just messin' witcha, son. Christ ain't like that at all. I was having a bad day, that's all." You could line up a whole lot of other clergy to say he's in the wrong, but how is their view more valid than his? Is it the sheer force of numbers? (My old Budweiser argument.) Or is it because they seem like nicer people? What if the old goat is right, and they're all wrong. How could we know for sure?
This is the problem with religions like Christianity. So much is up for grabs, and can't be nailed down (no pun intended), that it's pretty much impossible for any one person to definitely claim whole and correct knowledge. Hence the countless denominations and petty squabbles (like the old Two Baptists on a Bridge joke), the endless public debate over which precepts of the divine should be reflected in civil law, what's "moral" and "decent" and on and on and on. This is why atheists seem so intolerant and impatient about it: From their perspective, it's a roomful of teenagers fighting over which Batman is the best one, what's canon or not, and OMG who cares, SHUT UP all of you!
Yeah, the guy's a tool. But it's entirely fair to ask who he speaks for.
Calling him a tool implies he's useful for something. Within the church, he is not unless it is as an example of how not to behave if you call yourself a follower of Christ.
He speaks for himself - and the other blind, hateful fools who cloak themselves in the church because they think God will protect them. He won't. If they'd ever read Matthew 7 they'd know that.
NYCNative:Forgetting the vile antigay stuff, when he starts going on about who he will and won't vote for from the pulpit, how exactly does the church that employs him not get a letter that revokes their nonprofit status?
As best I can tell -- and mind you, IANAL, so this is strictly ex anus for legal considerations -- it's enough that he didn't speak the name of a candidate. (And yes, "Fartbongo" or "rhymes with 'Farack Yomama'" would probably count, if it was obvious who he was talking about.) And it's not that he can't do that, only that he can't do that along with "vote for" or "vote against". We all know who he's talking about, of course, especially when he says "the president". But "the president" is not a candidate in all references, even when he's running for re-election. If a pastor says he doesn't like what the president said or did, he's not electioneering. And if he says he won't vote for a "babykiller" or "gay-lover," he's only saying that he wouldn't vote for *any* such candidate. If only one such candidate is running at the time he says it, it still doesn't count, because he's stating a policy position, not expressly backing or opposing a named candidate -- in theory it could refer to anyone meeting the same definition, and it's not relevant that there might arguably be only one at the moment he says it.
This is also, by the way, why it's apparently legal for churches to directly lobby on specific policy issues, including proposed amendments (such as North Carolina's recent DOMA): policies are not candidates.
Old enough to know better:I keep telling myself this pathetic little man doesn't represent Christianity in general, but It'd feel a whole lot better to heard that he'd lost parishioners after his hateful tirade.
He'll probably gain from this, especially financially, but in a way I think that's okay. I look at it the same way I look at sports bars: I'm not a sports fan, and I often find sports fans annoying when they get to talking (by which I mean shouting). A sports bar is a place they can go to get away from my whiny ass, and it keeps them away from me: we're both happier for it. There's no reason bigots can't or shouldn't have their own church, and so long as they're not *actually* rounding up queers in electrified fences, then maybe we're all happier for there being bigot churches.
Guess what? If people stop conditioning children to believe in god and jesus and all that crap do you know what will happen? christianity will die out! And do you know why? Because religion is a learned behavior! Everyone on the planet is born an atheist!
I wish that were true, and I used to believe it myself. I used to believe that religion was memetic, a social equivalent of cumulative personality. (The latter is why long-term coma patients are 'different people' when they come out of it: Your personality is a cumulative effect of recent social memory, and if you go long enough without that you sort of lose it and start over again. I used to believe that religion is like that. And it kind of is, but there's more to it.) I used to believe that if you could just identify and server the transmission vectors, or sufficiently disrupt them, you could in effect kill off religion within a few generations, or at least manage to changer it into something a little less nutty and damaging. Alas, I no longer believe this.
It turns out, based on some fairly recent science of the last decade or so, that religion is apparently more or less inborn in most people, and very common, nearly ubiquitous. There's a part of the brain that has been identified with the profound experience of the divine: it does pretty much the same thing, no matter what one's faith or spiritual background. Why this is, no one really knows. Some philosophers, such as Daniel C. Dennett (see 'Breaking the Spell') speculate that it's the human equivalent of the 'intentional agent' reaction that many 'thinking animals' such as dogs have. (If your dog barks at a stick hitting the gutter -- an example from his book -- that's arguably similar to primitive humans assuming that thunder was some god expressing anger.) Dennett also points to how extremely self-deluding humans can be, using as example the rather unsettling case of cargo cults. The fact that otherwise perfectly sensible ...
Religion is not inborn, though. Maybe it is a need to believe in something or a need to be inquisitive or something like that, but no particular religion or religions are inherent.
Vangor:I just thought it was interesting how lesbians were, in his mind, a distinct group from homosexuals and queers.
That's a matter of semantic pedantry. You're right, but it's only because other than "male homosexual," the only gender-specific terms he could use are considered impolite even there. He can't exactly say "fags" while making this argument, or he'll just sound like a drunk college student. And he does need to make this gender distinction, because his whole point is to quarantine gays and segregate them by gender, so that they can't reproduce. He's talking more or less off the top of his head, so he picks "lesbians" first because that's easy. The part where he then talks about gay guys, I think he's fishing around for the right word, and it's just not there. So it does sound stupid, but it's not because he's actually that ignorant.
kemosabe:FlashHarry: extremism in ANY religion is bad.
I agree. This preacher needs to listen to Andy Stanley sermon on "Christian".
I just wish Christianity would just get it right. Is homosexuality a sin? Most definitely! Know what though, there are quite a few other sins too. And God loves everyone and does not condemn. Everyone sins, so why do we insist to call one group of sinners out over others? Just doesn't make sense.
Also, I have a feeling that this preachers has some homesexual tendencies. He who yells the loudest, usually is guilty.
"Cuz gayz r icky. Gay menz r like womenz, and lesobz r ugly and won't sleep with me, and.." -- we all know what this is really about, don't we? I'm sure this guy is enjoying his clams on the halfshell and blend shirts, and not losing any sleep over it. And I'm sure he never made his wife stay in an another building during her period back when she still got it. And he sure can't plead ignorance of Scripture for those oversights, can he? This is about bigotry, plain and simple. If I meet one Christian who actually follows all those rules, I'll congratulate them; anyone else is just a hypocrite making sorry excuses for their prejudices.
As for the closeted thing, it's surprising how often that turns out to be true, but some people really are just mean old bigots and just hate some other people for no good reason at all, not even their own. It's not like a lot of white supremacists are secretly black and trying to cover up for it, after all. Self-hatred is indeed a common enough motive for homophobia, but don't discount the ick factor, and plain old xenophobia: queers are weird to guys like this, and anything he can't understand is automatically suspect. If it's icky to him, too, that's all he needs to be sure that it's just got to be wrong.
Appropriate, But it does kinda leave out the whole "God nuked two cities from orbit for that behavior" thing, doesn't it? Keep in mind, if you actually bother to READ the bible and not take a spun version of it from a talking head, you find out that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for more than just Homosexuality. They practiced bestiality as well as worshiping pagan gods and practicing human sacrifice. So yeah, "they left off the proper use of men and women, and lusted after one another" and tried to Gay-rape two angels (REALLY bad idea) who were scouting the city to find Lot before it was destroyed due to a previous agreement with Abraham. "But that's just a story!" "that never REALLY happened" you say. These guys have a record of what actually happened. Pretty interesting find for historical reasons.
LavenderWolf:/not that killing gays is genocide, there will still be gays in the future, I just don't have a better word.
Depends on definition, and there are many. The term was created in 1944 by a Polish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, originally inspired by the massacre of Armenians. By this point, he was of course referring to the practices of the Third Reich, and his terminology informed the Nuremberg Trials. He refined his definition after the War, and the UN adopted versions of it. But all those definitions took the traditional perspective of historical groups defined by ethnicity, religion, and so on, that we normally associate with the term even today.
It wasn't until 1959, apparently, that Peter Drost proposed this expanded definition: "Genocide is the deliberate destruction of physical life of individual human beings by reason of their membership of any human collectivity as such." That's much more in line with my own thinking, that genocide is a conscious attempt to exterminate *any* discrete group of persons, by any definition that the perpetrator conceives as such. (Even imaginary ones, such as 'lizard people': If a majority of Americans attempted their destruction, I would call that genocide, even if the intent and definition is clearly insane, only because the act itself is real and affects real people.)
So yes, he's talking about genocide. He's talking about taking a defined group of people and trying to exterminating them.
Sylvia_Bandersnatch:LavenderWolf: /not that killing gays is genocide, there will still be gays in the future, I just don't have a better word.
Depends on definition, and there are many. The term was created in 1944 by a Polish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, originally inspired by the massacre of Armenians. By this point, he was of course referring to the practices of the Third Reich, and his terminology informed the Nuremberg Trials. He refined his definition after the War, and the UN adopted versions of it. But all those definitions took the traditional perspective of historical groups defined by ethnicity, religion, and so on, that we normally associate with the term even today.
It wasn't until 1959, apparently, that Peter Drost proposed this expanded definition: "Genocide is the deliberate destruction of physical life of individual human beings by reason of their membership of any human collectivity as such." That's much more in line with my own thinking, that genocide is a conscious attempt to exterminate *any* discrete group of persons, by any definition that the perpetrator conceives as such. (Even imaginary ones, such as 'lizard people': If a majority of Americans attempted their destruction, I would call that genocide, even if the intent and definition is clearly insane, only because the act itself is real and affects real people.)
So yes, he's talking about genocide. He's talking about taking a defined group of people and trying to exterminating them.
TRYING. Trying. He's trying, so it's not really genocide. Just attempted genocide ethnic cleansing purification preserving the family.
Allen. The end.:Boatmech: fustanella Please don't feed the Christer troll. why? Allen. The end. These preachers are gay. Or at least, worthy of a brick in the ass. Time to start offing these fevered egos. I mean, metaphorically, rite??? /is it legal to call for genocide? ` no.
Just checking...I mean, there's free speech, but DAMN you gotta think about chronic assholism...wait...calling for genocide is illegal???
[Requisite IANAL]
It depends on how you do it. If you do it like he did, you're only skirting. He's taking the "I had a notion" approach, which is a kind of moongazing: He's not *expressly advocating* his idea, only talking about it. If that sounds like hairsplitting, a fair analogy is the guy at the bar talking about how he'd like to nail the hot chick down there: He's not going to be charged with intent to commit rape, nor should he. This guy actually says that Congress would never go for it, and he's right. But just saying that absolves him of intent, in that he defers to the legal civil authority right at the top of his insane rant. If nothing else, he's at least a professional bigot who knows where the boundaries are knows not to cross them. He does play the "I'm not touching you!" thing a little too well, I agree. But as near as I can tell, he's not breaking any laws, just being a rotten little prick, which is totally legal. (And a good thing, too, or most of us here would have been up on charges multiple times already.)
MmmmBacon:Unfortunately, some of my own family would agree with this preacher, and one of my sisters in particular would go even farther. She'd be happy to throw in all the "illegal immigrants, non-Christians, non-whites, and liberals" into those electric pens, as well.
Being a Wiccan who is politically on the Liberal side of the fence, you can imagine my sister and I don't really talk much. Fine by me, I'm not one for hanging out with 'Christian Identity' scum, anyway. A few other family members of mine that are far-Right aren't quite as bad, but we still don't get along. I wish them a Happy Birthday, they tell me they'll 'pray for me' in return.
Makes me wonder if I was adopted, or just somehow managed to avoid all the derp-genes? Regardless, people like this preacher make me sick.
[checks profile] - Why are we not dating? Or at least hanging out?
chaotey:Weaver95: WorldCitizen: If there is a God who agrees with this man, all hope is lost.
oh there's a couple of gods out there that would agree with this ranting...they're just not christian ones.
couple/few of the old gods would be just fine with blood sacrifices. Moloch, Ba'al, some of the babylonian gods.
I always assume that anyone who says "god" and is preaching fire and brimstone means Moloch, and anyone who says "god" and is preaching prosperity gospel means Mammon. For you can tell which god a man worships not by the name he uses but the symbols he invokes when he worships and speaks of it.
spiral_fishcake:He made three very political statements in his sermon: He was disappointed in the president's decision to support gay marriage, that he would "not vote for a baby killer and a homosexual", and that he could not get his internment plan through the congress. Can we sic the IRS on him for political campaigning while representing a tax-exempt organization, please?
[IANAL]
It's not technically electioneering, so no. All citizens and all organisations have a right to express their views on all matters of public policy, including the actions of specific persons who may or may not be candidates. So long as they don't move to deprive others of their civil rights, or expressly advocate such, and otherwise do not directly endanger or harm others, then their speech is protected, even if it's ugly and hateful. ("I don't like it" is not harm. "What it they're serious?" is not a direct threat.) Non-profits may not expressly support or oppose candidates, but they're free to talk about what they like or don't like about them, even by name.
cherrydog:doglover: cherrydog: it's pathetic and disrespectful to lesbians as human beings.
Not every time. Trust me.
As for the times it happens, most of the time someone's rubbing things, real lesbians aren't involved. Usually just two actresses who are in it for the money.
And if you're gonna get upset about the internet masturbating to things disrespectfully, you should just go be Amish, though. I mean, have you SEEN the shiat that gets posted in... well you probably haven't and that's for the best.
The beauty of the internet. It doesn't matter who you are or what you think, someone is fapping to everything you ever loved.
it seems you're deliberately missing my points, but whatever
No, he just doesn't care. You think you're talking to a grown-up, but you're not.
Aigoo:Calling him a tool implies he's useful for something. Within the church, he is not unless it is as an example of how not to behave if you call yourself a follower of Christ.
He speaks for himself - and the other blind, hateful fools who cloak themselves in the church because they think God will protect them. He won't. If they'd ever read Matthew 7 they'd know that.
"Tool" is a slang term for penis. (Because, you know, you 'use' it.) I'm calling him a penis. A dick. A prick. A rotten little man who expresses his manhood in ugly and despicable ways. If you're over twelve years old, you don't need this explained to you.
Being pedantic and obtuse for the sake of kicking off of me to launch your own speech isn't clever, kid, and the fact that I agree with you makes it only slightly less annoying. If you have a point to make, make it on the strength of your own rhetorical skills, not on your deliberate misunderstandings of others'.
Mock26:Religion is not inborn, though. Maybe it is a need to believe in something or a need to be inquisitive or something like that, but no particular religion or religions are inherent.
The specific tenets of any given tradition of faith are obviously not genetic, yes. I didn't think anyone over four years old would be at risk of taking away that meaning from what I said, but would rather grasp the broader sense that the drive to have and experience religion appears to be inborn. Strictly parsing that one sentence on its own should indeed justify that criticism, but taken in context I believe my meaning is perfectly clear, and it's therefore unwarranted. But here's your cookie anyway, if it makes you happy, okay?