If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Wimp)   Let's face it. This illusion is really, really weird   (wimp.com) divider line 73
    More: Weird, magic  
•       •       •

10063 clicks; posted to Video » on 20 May 2012 at 5:47 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



73 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-05-20 02:14:40 PM
Woah.
 
2012-05-20 02:58:10 PM
You mean my face is going to STAY this way?
 
2012-05-20 03:00:14 PM
I feel queasy.
 
2012-05-20 03:12:59 PM
Don't do that while tripping.......
 
2012-05-20 03:21:06 PM
Instant caricature....
 
2012-05-20 03:42:56 PM
I shouldn't have eaten that sheet of window pain this morning.
 
2012-05-20 03:55:28 PM
Wow. Just, wow.
 
2012-05-20 03:56:48 PM
what am i missing? I'm half-baked and drank a pretty good amount of beer. what.
 
2012-05-20 03:58:38 PM
Oh crap, never mind.
 
2012-05-20 04:40:40 PM
farm1.staticflickr.com
 
2012-05-20 04:44:10 PM
Wow. I'm almost never able to see optical illusions that require concentration.
 
2012-05-20 04:46:23 PM
Like a parade of The New Yorker cover pages.
 
2012-05-20 04:49:20 PM
Apos: Let's fact it?

Would you rather fiction it?
 
2012-05-20 04:55:57 PM
Nicole Kidman's forehead is HUGE!
 
2012-05-20 04:59:45 PM
Could somebody explain what I'm missing?


/ Prosopagnosia
 
2012-05-20 05:08:51 PM
Grimble Crumble: Could somebody explain what I'm missing?


/ Prosopagnosia


When focusing on the center +, the faces begin to look more like caricatures rather than actual photographs, the facial features look distorted.
 
2012-05-20 05:11:43 PM
Whoa. And I do mean whoa. That is very weird indeed.
 
2012-05-20 05:13:18 PM
You mean i need a plug-in?
...ah..i don't farking think so....


next.
 
2012-05-20 05:16:49 PM
"These faces have not been altered."

Well, no, not by the person who made the video...
 
2012-05-20 05:20:36 PM
AKA the kind of shiat we Psych majors dealt with on a daily basis.

/it was like 80% or more chicks, seriously
 
2012-05-20 05:22:40 PM
Bedstead Polisher: Grimble Crumble: Could somebody explain what I'm missing?


/ Prosopagnosia

When focusing on the center +, the faces begin to look more like caricatures rather than actual photographs, the facial features look distorted.



Thanks. I understand now but still can't see it.
 
2012-05-20 05:25:06 PM
Grimble Crumble: Prosopagnosia

I think you mean Flashed Face Distortion?
 
2012-05-20 05:37:17 PM
Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Grimble Crumble: Prosopagnosia

I think you mean Flashed Face Distortion?


No, faces don't have any meaning to me; I can't recognize most people. Never have been able to. I can only recognize those I spend an hour or more with every day for at least five days a week.

I can tell my coworkers, and family members (mostly), but don't recognize any of my neighbors. Coworkers that used to work with me six months ago are complete strangers, they have to introduce themselves.

At my father's funeral, I sat next to this one girl for an hour and twenty minutes. It was only later that I found out she was my sister. I hadn't seen her in three years.

As far as television goes, I can recognize maybe 30 celebrities, but only because I watch the shows daily. I can only enjoy reruns that run daily, because prime time shows are only once weekly, and I forget who everyone is.

I assume from the above comments that the pictures in the video are some sort of celebrities; I wouldn't know.


/threadjack over
 
2012-05-20 05:51:12 PM
Grimble Crumble: Could somebody explain what I'm missing?


/ Prosopagnosia


the illusion perhaps?
 
2012-05-20 05:59:42 PM
Try viewing it upside down for even more creepy goodness. I also tried it with color filter 3D glasses, which did not seem to have any effect (other than to make the colors a little muddy).
 
2012-05-20 06:07:20 PM
So you're telling me that when I focus on a certain point, things I see outside of that focal point will be distorted?
 
2012-05-20 06:22:53 PM
primetime.unrealitytv.co.ukt2.gstatic.com
 
2012-05-20 06:33:29 PM
Ah, I see that they have finally figured out how to transmit LSD over TCP/IP. That's good.
 
2012-05-20 07:00:14 PM
Grimble Crumble: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Grimble Crumble: Prosopagnosia

I think you mean Flashed Face Distortion?

No, faces don't have any meaning to me; I can't recognize most people. Never have been able to. I can only recognize those I spend an hour or more with every day for at least five days a week.

I can tell my coworkers, and family members (mostly), but don't recognize any of my neighbors. Coworkers that used to work with me six months ago are complete strangers, they have to introduce themselves.

At my father's funeral, I sat next to this one girl for an hour and twenty minutes. It was only later that I found out she was my sister. I hadn't seen her in three years.

As far as television goes, I can recognize maybe 30 celebrities, but only because I watch the shows daily. I can only enjoy reruns that run daily, because prime time shows are only once weekly, and I forget who everyone is.

I assume from the above comments that the pictures in the video are some sort of celebrities; I wouldn't know.


/threadjack over


The effect should work fine whether you recognize the faces or not.
 
2012-05-20 07:08:25 PM
Grimble Crumble: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Grimble Crumble: Prosopagnosia

I think you mean Flashed Face Distortion?

No, faces don't have any meaning to me; I can't recognize most people. Never have been able to. I can only recognize those I spend an hour or more with every day for at least five days a week.

I can tell my coworkers, and family members (mostly), but don't recognize any of my neighbors. Coworkers that used to work with me six months ago are complete strangers, they have to introduce themselves.

At my father's funeral, I sat next to this one girl for an hour and twenty minutes. It was only later that I found out she was my sister. I hadn't seen her in three years.

As far as television goes, I can recognize maybe 30 celebrities, but only because I watch the shows daily. I can only enjoy reruns that run daily, because prime time shows are only once weekly, and I forget who everyone is.

I assume from the above comments that the pictures in the video are some sort of celebrities; I wouldn't know.


/threadjack over


Here's a picture of my family and I:

i49.tinypic.com
 
2012-05-20 07:10:22 PM
What's funny is that I could still identify the person even with the distorted image.
 
2012-05-20 07:12:06 PM
www.jimpoz.com

Stares off into space in agreement
 
2012-05-20 07:57:43 PM
Ever read that Stephen King story Suffer the Little Children?

Didn't make it through the video, it was too freaky. It was like they were alien body snatchers whose faces began to revert when you weren't paying attention, only to snap back just as you looked at them.
 
2012-05-20 09:30:02 PM
All I saw was a plus sign and some flashing things on either side.
 
2012-05-20 09:37:14 PM
I think it safe to say that this proves they are all monsters. Something must be done.
 
2012-05-20 09:46:06 PM
Precision Boobery: Ever read that Stephen King story Suffer the Little Children?

Didn't make it through the video, it was too freaky. It was like they were alien body snatchers whose faces began to revert when you weren't paying attention, only to snap back just as you looked at them.


Well then you, I am truly sorry to say, have inferior turtle eyes.
 
2012-05-20 09:46:32 PM
MensRea: I think it safe to say that this proves they are all monsters. Something must be done.

from space
 
2012-05-20 10:15:38 PM
That's pretty much the most freaky illusion I've seen.. I thought for sure the pictures were shopped until I went back to see what they looked like.
 
2012-05-20 10:17:03 PM
I think it works better if your eyes are closer to the screen..
 
2012-05-20 10:32:42 PM
woah.
 
2012-05-20 11:53:04 PM
Still not an illusion. You really only see in detail what you're looking directly at, by focusing on the + you're ensuring you won't process all of the information of the pictures on the sides.

It's a neat demonstration of how vision gets processed, and how much brain function is spent on faces in particular. More of a science in motion, remarkably easy Mr. Wizard stuff, than any kind of trick or misdirection that is meant to actually fool and entertain people. It's a lesson, not an illusion, though one could base an illusion based on the phenomenon.

People say illusion as if it's a constructed deceit in common parlance but it ends up and it's just a display of biological phenomenon. Technically correct(fitting a different and uncommon definition of illusion), but misleading. I suppose more hits result from illusion than science behind perception. Whatever, it's neat, but is has was the last ten times it's been on fark too.....*yawn*

These "illusion" links show you nothing that's really been manipulated and let your mind do all the work. Meaning, the most boring and crappy illusionists would not dare to use these things as is. Nothing like actual entertainment, just interesting education. Bit of a pet peeve I suppose.

Then again, I should take it as granted, that people will find things like this amazing illusions worthy of the stage. I'm on fark after all. We mock ICP and their theory on magnets(magic all up in this biatch), then spin around and cast childlike wonderment at the very simplest of things.
 
2012-05-20 11:53:12 PM
i82.photobucket.com
 
2012-05-20 11:59:02 PM
...
 
2012-05-21 12:01:19 AM
Well that was weird.
 
2012-05-21 12:15:26 AM
omeganuepsilon: Still not an illusion. You really only see in detail what you're looking directly at, by focusing on the + you're ensuring you won't process all of the information of the pictures on the sides.

It's a neat demonstration of how vision gets processed, and how much brain function is spent on faces in particular. More of a science in motion, remarkably easy Mr. Wizard stuff, than any kind of trick or misdirection that is meant to actually fool and entertain people. It's a lesson, not an illusion, though one could base an illusion based on the phenomenon.

People say illusion as if it's a constructed deceit in common parlance but it ends up and it's just a display of biological phenomenon. Technically correct(fitting a different and uncommon definition of illusion), but misleading. I suppose more hits result from illusion than science behind perception. Whatever, it's neat, but is has was the last ten times it's been on fark too.....*yawn*

These "illusion" links show you nothing that's really been manipulated and let your mind do all the work. Meaning, the most boring and crappy illusionists would not dare to use these things as is. Nothing like actual entertainment, just interesting education. Bit of a pet peeve I suppose.

Then again, I should take it as granted, that people will find things like this amazing illusions worthy of the stage. I'm on fark after all. We mock ICP and their theory on magnets(magic all up in this biatch), then spin around and cast childlike wonderment at the very simplest of things.


What in the fark are you babbling about?
 
2012-05-21 12:34:19 AM
Mentat: What in the fark are you babbling about?

Sorry, I'll try to keep my posts down to mono-syllabic grunts just for you.
 
2012-05-21 12:35:37 AM
I think they paired the people in the pictures by similarity of nose structure.
 
2012-05-21 12:39:05 AM
omeganuepsilon: Mentat: What in the fark are you babbling about?

Sorry, I'll try to keep my posts down to mono-syllabic grunts just for you.


Oh, is this hipster satire? I love that!
 
2012-05-21 01:07:04 AM
Grimble Crumble: Thanks. I understand now but still can't see it.

Grimble Crumble: I assume from the above comments that the pictures in the video are some sort of celebrities; I wouldn't know.

And, ones usually considered relatively good looking, who look rather unappealingly (even freakishly) distorted in the flashed-face effect.

If so, you might kind enough to drop an e-mail to the authors of the piece Sylvia_Bandersnatch linked to to let them know prosopagnosia may negate this illusion. It might help them understand it, and perhaps eventually help lead to a treatment for others with your condition... in 20-odd years.
 
2012-05-21 02:05:34 AM
Monkeyfark Ridiculous: Grimble Crumble: Sylvia_Bandersnatch: Grimble Crumble: Prosopagnosia

No, faces don't have any meaning to me...

The effect should work fine whether you recognize the faces or not.


I wouldn't bet on it. It's probably the part of the brain that processes faces doing some hocus-pocus that's causing this illusion. If your brain doesn't process faces normally the illusion probably does not work. There are some other illusions which involve faces either right side up or upside-down that rely on such things as well and I'd imagine someone with Prosopagnosia would not be affected by those as much as well.
 
Displayed 50 of 73 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report