If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Christian Science Monitor)   Are Ron Paul supporters really planning to hijack the GOP national convention? Well, how else are they going to get their critical anti-chemtrails plank in the platform?   (csmonitor.com) divider line 32
    More: Amusing, Ron Paul, GOP, political convention, Paul campaign, internet freedom, indefinite detention, presumptive nominee, policy reform  
•       •       •

1322 clicks; posted to Politics » on 17 May 2012 at 3:54 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-05-17 04:18:15 PM
2 votes:
Chemtrails would explain Orly Taitz.
2012-05-17 04:13:28 PM
2 votes:
Close2TheEdge: I'm really baffled by the whole "Audit the Fed" movement. What exactly do they hope to discover?

Considering that:

1. RON PAUL actually got a bill to the floor to do just that, but
2. RON PAUL then voted against the bill since it had riders he didn't like,

they are getting taken for a ride.

Oh, they'll say it's because he's "principled." He's so principled that he will attach earmarks to a bill to fund pork projects in his district...but he'll vote against the bill they're in. Of course, he attached those earmarks to bills that were assured of passage.

Funny that he'll use the system to make him look good in his district, but won't use the system to get something that's supposedly vital to the survival of our republic.

And he's for Freedom of Speech, but wants states to be able to limit it as they see fit. He claims there's no "right to privacy," since those words don't appear in the Constitution, even as he references the Ninth Amendment ("The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people") and claims that the same document is "replete with references to God," when it actually doesn't have a single such reference.

Typical snake-oil salesman, and they're guzzling that shiat down.
2012-05-17 04:11:36 PM
2 votes:
kid_icarus: What the GOP National Convention might look like this year..
[i76.photobucket.com image 454x202]


wwwdelivery.superstock.com
What it will actually look like.
2012-05-17 04:10:19 PM
2 votes:
i47.photobucket.com
2012-05-17 03:59:53 PM
2 votes:
I'm just hoping for a gun fight between 2 people standing their ground.
2012-05-17 03:56:29 PM
2 votes:
Oh, let's hope we can get some chemtrail nutters in here. That's always a laugh riot.

Look for the oily, rainbow-colored contrails!
2012-05-17 09:05:27 PM
1 votes:
theorellior: cman: WE WILL SAVE THIS WORLD AGAINST FLUORIDE, HAARP, CHEMTRAILS, VACCINES, AND LIZARD PEOPLE!!!111!!

NOT TO MENTION FIAT CURRENCY, THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION AND BLACK HELICOPTERS.



Paultards are way more fun than regular republicans. I hope there are enough of them to wreak havoc.
2012-05-17 05:35:43 PM
1 votes:
Citrate1007: rufus-t-firefly: Close2TheEdge: I'm really baffled by the whole "Audit the Fed" movement. What exactly do they hope to discover?

Considering that:

1. RON PAUL actually got a bill to the floor to do just that, but
2. RON PAUL then voted against the bill since it had riders he didn't like,

they are getting taken for a ride.

Oh, they'll say it's because he's "principled." He's so principled that he will attach earmarks to a bill to fund pork projects in his district...but he'll vote against the bill they're in. Of course, he attached those earmarks to bills that were assured of passage.

Funny that he'll use the system to make him look good in his district, but won't use the system to get something that's supposedly vital to the survival of our republic.

And he's for Freedom of Speech, but wants states to be able to limit it as they see fit. He claims there's no "right to privacy," since those words don't appear in the Constitution, even as he references the Ninth Amendment ("The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people") and claims that the same document is "replete with references to God," when it actually doesn't have a single such reference.

Typical snake-oil salesman, and they're guzzling that shiat down.

But legal drugs man, that sounds so groovy.


Just wait until the feds legalize them...then states ban them.

That's how things would work under the RON PAUL Articles of Confederation II.
2012-05-17 05:11:48 PM
1 votes:
While I think RON PAUL is a crazy old man I wish him the best of luck in causing havoc at the RNC
2012-05-17 05:00:45 PM
1 votes:
Ned Stark: rufus-t-firefly: "There is nothing, natural or man-made, as elastic as the ethics of a zealot."

What exactly is unethical about it?

A primary is not an election. It's an internal matter of a political party. And the Republican party's primary clearly isn't democratic in either function or intent so why not game the system?


The proof that Republican party's primary clearly isn't democratic in either function or intent being that RON PAUL didn't manage to win a single primary?
2012-05-17 04:35:51 PM
1 votes:
Bill_Wick's_Friend: whidbey: It's been proven they cause Communism.

Funny, Cuz I was at a "stop the war in Iraq" rally in 2004 and overheard hard-core lefties all one-upping each other on their knowledge of (and the suffering to their lives caused by) chemtrails.


Crazy knows no political partisanship.
2012-05-17 04:33:58 PM
1 votes:
whidbey: It's been proven they cause Communism.

Funny, Cuz I was at a "stop the war in Iraq" rally in 2004 and overheard hard-core lefties all one-upping each other on their knowledge of (and the suffering to their lives caused by) chemtrails.
2012-05-17 04:31:40 PM
1 votes:
EyeballKid: kid_icarus: What the GOP National Convention might look like this year..
[i76.photobucket.com image 454x202]

[wwwdelivery.superstock.com image 350x233]
What it will actually look like.


More like this:
images.wikia.com
2012-05-17 04:27:01 PM
1 votes:
ArkPanda: Citrate1007: What the fark is a chemtrail. I'm just going to assume that it is something really stupid and that I don't want it in my search history.

They're just contrails (exhaust from high flying jets that look like lines of cloud). The chemtrail people think the government is using them to spray [INSERT_CHEMICAL_HERE] to cause [INSERT_EFFECT_HERE] in everybody.


It's been proven they cause Communism.
2012-05-17 04:26:33 PM
1 votes:
couragewolfmeme.com
2012-05-17 04:20:34 PM
1 votes:
Citrate1007: What the fark is a chemtrail. I'm just going to assume that it is something really stupid and that I don't want it in my search history.

Chemtrails are the white lines of clouds you see in the sky after a jet passes high above. It's water vapor condensing from jet exhaust. The Tinfoil Brigade has long believed that they're part of an evil gubmin' plot to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
2012-05-17 04:19:25 PM
1 votes:
Citrate1007: What the fark is a chemtrail. I'm just going to assume that it is something really stupid and that I don't want it in my search history.

Contrails

Contrails (play /ˈkɒntreɪlz/; short for "condensation trails") or vapour trails are long thin artificial clouds that sometimes form behind aircraft. Their formation is most often triggered by the water vapour in the exhaust of aircraft engines, but can also be triggered by the changes in air pressure in wingtip vortices or in the air over the entire wing surface. Like all clouds, contrails are made of water, in the form of a suspension of billions of liquid droplets or ice crystals.

Oh, wait, you didn't want the real-world answer. You want the whackjob version..

Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some trails left by aircraft are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in clandestine programs directed by government officials. This theory is not accepted by the scientific community, which states that they are just normal contrails, and that there is no scientific evidence supporting the chemtrail theory.

As a result of the popularity of the conspiracy theory, official agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have demanded an explanation. The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly denied by scientists around the world, who say the trails are normal contrails. The United States Air Force states that the theory is a hoax which "has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications". The United Kingdom's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that chemtrails are not scientifically recognized phenomena. The Canadian Leader of the Government in the House of Commons has rejected the idea of chemtrails as being a "popularised expression", adding that "there is no scientific evidence to support their existence."

The term chemtrail is derived from "chemical trail", in the similar fashion that contrail is a portmanteau of condensation trail. It does not refer to other forms of aerial spraying such as crop dusting, cloud seeding, skywriting, or aerial firefighting. The term specifically refers to aerial trails allegedly caused by the systematic high-altitude release of chemical substances not found in ordinary contrails, resulting in the appearance of characteristic sky tracks. Supporters of this conspiracy theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be for solar radiation management, population control, weather control, or biological warfare/chemical warfare and claim that these trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.

2012-05-17 04:17:18 PM
1 votes:
rufus-t-firefly: And he's for Freedom of Speech, but wants states to be able to limit it as they see fit.

He also has a history of suing youtube videos for trademark infringement because he thinks it's illegal for people to say the word "Ron Paul" without Ron Paul's permission.

Wait, am I getting sued now?

Link
2012-05-17 04:13:19 PM
1 votes:
What the fark is a chemtrail. I'm just going to assume that it is something really stupid and that I don't want it in my search history.
2012-05-17 04:07:01 PM
1 votes:
Close2TheEdge: I'm really baffled by the whole "Audit the Fed" movement. What exactly do they hope to discover?

I think they're expecting to find Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate.
2012-05-17 04:06:03 PM
1 votes:
"There is nothing, natural or man-made, as elastic as the ethics of a zealot."
2012-05-17 04:03:57 PM
1 votes:
hopefully it will end like True Romance
2012-05-17 04:01:41 PM
1 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-05-17 03:59:43 PM
1 votes:
And, as always, the answer to the question headline is: NO.
2012-05-17 03:58:07 PM
1 votes:
cman: WE WILL SAVE THIS WORLD AGAINST FLUORIDE, HAARP, CHEMTRAILS, VACCINES, AND LIZARD PEOPLE!!!111!!

NOT TO MENTION FIAT CURRENCY, THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION AND BLACK HELICOPTERS.
2012-05-17 03:55:45 PM
1 votes:
RON PAUL • 2012 • GOP
UPGRADING AMERICA TO ALL CAPS
2012-05-17 02:58:53 PM
1 votes:
What the GOP National Convention might look like this year..
i76.photobucket.com
2012-05-17 02:58:27 PM
1 votes:
I just wish he'd do something about that damned Dihydrogen Monoxide.

/DHMO KILLS
2012-05-17 02:55:19 PM
1 votes:
Could you not, please? You're going to lose anyway and I don't need the traffic.
2012-05-17 02:53:02 PM
1 votes:
I suggest they take hostages and burn the convention hall to the ground

/just for the LOLs
2012-05-17 02:48:46 PM
1 votes:
LOUD NOISES!!
2012-05-17 02:39:10 PM
1 votes:
WE TRUTHERS ARE NOT GOING AWAY!!!11!!

WE WILL SAVE THIS WORLD AGAINST FLUORIDE, HAARP, CHEMTRAILS, VACCINES, AND LIZARD PEOPLE!!!111!!
 
Displayed 32 of 32 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report